Next Article in Journal
Designing Activities to Develop Statistical Literacy in Primary Pupils While Conducting Physics Laboratory Work in Informal Settings
Next Article in Special Issue
A Problem-Centered Approach to Designing Blended Courses: Unifying Online and Face-to-Face Modalities
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers’ Pedagogical Scientific Language Knowledge
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effects of First-Time Experiences and Self-Regulation on College Students’ Online Learning Motivation: Based on a National Survey during COVID-19

Educ. Sci. 2022, 12(4), 245; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040245
by Gege Li 1, Heng Luo 1,*, Jing Lei 2,*, Shuxian Xu 1 and Tianjiao Chen 1
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Educ. Sci. 2022, 12(4), 245; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040245
Submission received: 21 February 2022 / Revised: 24 March 2022 / Accepted: 25 March 2022 / Published: 29 March 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

A very interesting and well-executed manucript, with a highly topical subject.

In terms of format, the numbering of the sections should be revised, especially on page 7, where there is confusion in the numbering. There are also some typographical errors. 

The theoretical framework includes a broad theoretical approach with well-selected references. 

However, I recommend the authors to remove the hypotheses from the theoretical framework and move them to the Method section, where they should be located.

The method section is well written but lacks information on the validation of the instruments used. This information should be added. It is appreciated that they have included the instrument in the annexes.

Although it is a very complete section, I recommend separating discussion and conclusion as two sections.

I congratulate the authors for the manuscript and hope to contribute to its improvement with these recommendations. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear author(s),

congratulation on you impressive collection of data. I was not sure you comply with the academic rigours of analyzing the data like validity and representativity, but the last chapter "saved" from rejection.

What is the added value of this study compared to similar studies? Originality of the study?

Line 32-33- the author(s) state that:

"the success of online learning is largely determined by three pertinent constructs: learner motivation, educational experience, and self-regulation [6-8]. what about barriers? lack of internet access? No money for laptops or computers?

Further good luck and all the best

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Back to TopTop