Effective Music Teachers and Effective Music Teaching Today: A Systematic Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- (1)
- What are the main features related to effective music teachers and effective music teaching that have been examined recently in educational research?
- (2)
- How has the research viewed the analysis and promotion of effectiveness in both preservice and in-service music teachers?
- (3)
- What is the role of teacher training (preservice and in-service) in enhancing the characteristics of effective teaching in music education according to the research?
2.1. Inclusion Criteria
- (1)
- The articles must present a research study (qualitative or quantitative) pertaining to the theme of effective music teachers and teaching.
- (2)
- The articles must have been published between 2002 and 20221 in a peer-reviewed journal in the field of educational and psychological research.
- (3)
- The articles must be written in English.
- (4)
- The terms “effective/effectiveness” and “music teacher/teaching” must be included in the keywords or the main topics of the articles.
- (5)
- Participants must be pre- or in-service specialist music teachers (not generalist teachers who also teach music in their classes).
2.2. Search Strategies
- -
- Some articles were essays explicating and discussing a specific theoretical claim (n = 4).
- -
- Other articles were reviews of the literature (rather than empirical studies; n = 2).
- -
- Others were articles offering practical suggestions for music teachers (n = 2).
- -
- One article was a research study that addressed effective teaching from a general perspective (thus lacking a specific focus on music education).
- -
- One article was the report of a validation process for an assessing instrument.
- -
- One article was mainly focused on the effectiveness of a training course for preservice music teachers.
2.3. Analysis of the Articles
3. Results
3.1. Year of Publication (Frequencies)
3.2. Nationality of the Study and Participants (Frequencies)
3.3. Research Methodology (Frequencies)
3.4. Dimensions of Effective Teaching and Teachers (Categories)
- Pedagogical approach to teaching and teaching strategies (n = 9);
- Role of training experiences (preservice and in-service, n = 7);
- Interpersonal relations and teacher’s social competence (n = 5);
- Personality traits (n = 5);
- Professional self-efficacy (n = 4);
- Communication and communicative style (n = 4);
- Professional expertise and motivation (n = 3);
- Instructional cycle (n = 2);
- Performing skills (n = 2);
- Other aspects related to teachers’ personal, cognitive and emotional aspects (n = 7);
- Other aspects related to teachers’ professional competences (n = 4).
3.4.1. Pedagogical Approach to Teaching and Teaching Strategies
3.4.2. Role of Training Experiences (Preservice and In-Service)
3.4.3. Interpersonal Relations and Teachers’ Social Competences
3.4.4. Personality Traits
3.4.5. Professional Self-Efficacy
3.4.6. Communication and Communicative Style
3.4.7. Instructional Cycle
3.4.8. Professional Expertise and Motivation
3.4.9. Performing Skills
3.4.10. Other Aspects Related to Teachers’ Personal, Cognitive and Emotional Aspects
3.4.11. Other Aspects Related to Teachers’ Professional Competences
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Brand, M. Music Teacher Effectiveness: Selected Historical and Contemporary Research Approaches. Aust. J. Music Educ. 2009, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allsup, R.E. Music teacher quality and the problem of routine expertise. Philos. Music Educ. Rev. 2015, 23, 5–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ballantyne, J. What music teachers want: The emergence of a unified understanding of an ideal teacher education course. Aust. J. Teach. Educ. 2006, 31, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Witty, P. An analysis of the personality traits of effective teachers. J. Educ. Res. 1947, 40, 662–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finefter-Rosenbluh, I.; Ryan, T.; Barnes, M. The impact of student perception surveys on teachers’ practice: Teacher resistance and struggle in student voice-based assessment initiatives of effective teaching. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2021, 106, 103436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, D.A. A Different Paradigm in Music Education: Re-Examining the Profession; Routledge: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Townsend, A.S. Introduction to Effective Music Teaching: Artistry and Attitude; Rowman & Littlefield: Lanham, MD, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Firrincieli, A. Maieutic: A teaching and learning approach. As applied to western music. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2017, 237, 1520–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst. Rev. 2021, 10, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayçiçek, B. Integration of critical thinking into curriculum: Perspectives of prospective teachers. Think. Ski. Creat. 2021, 41, 100895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baker, V.D. Profile of an effective urban music educator. Update Appl. Res. Music Educ. 2012, 31, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ballantyne, J. Integration, contextualization and continuity: Three themes for the development of effective music teacher education programmes. Int. J. Music Educ. 2007, 25, 119–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ballantyne, J.; Zhukov, K. A good news story: Early-career music teachers’ accounts of their “flourishing” professional identities. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2017, 68, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biasutti, M.; Concina, E. The effective music teacher: The influence of personal, social, and cognitive dimensions on music teacher self-efficacy. Musicae Sci. 2018, 22, 264–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biasutti, M.; Concina, E.; Deloughry, C.; Frate, S.; Konkol, G.; Mangiacotti, A.; Rotar Pance, B.; Vidulin, S. The effective music teacher: A model for predicting music teacher’s self-efficacy. Psychol. Music 2021, 49, 1498–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biasutti, M.; Frate, S.; Concina, E. Music teachers’ professional development: Assessing a three-year collaborative online course. Music Educ. Res. 2019, 21, 116–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blackwell, J. Expertise in applied studio teaching: Teachers working with multiple levels of learners. Int. J. Music Educ. 2020, 38, 283–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burton, S.L. Perspective consciousness and cultural relevancy: Partnership considerations for the re-conceptualization of music teacher preparation. Arts Educ. Policy Rev. 2011, 112, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Button, S. Music teachers’ perceptions of effective teaching. Bull. Counc. Res. Music Educ. 2010, 25–38. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27861470 (accessed on 15 December 2022). [CrossRef]
- Daniel, R.; Parkes, K. The Apprentice to Master Journey: Exploring Tertiary Music Instrument Teachers’ Reflections on Their Experiences as Learner. J. Arts Humanit. 2015, 4, 52–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Howard, S.A.; Seaver, K.J. Music educators’ self-perceptions of interpersonal skills: An exploratory study. Update Appl. Res. Music Educ. 2013, 32, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Johnson, C.; Williams, L.; Parisi, J.; Brunkan, M. Behavioral characteristics and instructional patterns of expert teaching, and the transfer of those behaviors into a musical setting: Two case studies. Int. J. Music Educ. 2016, 34, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juchniewicz, J. The influence of social intelligence on effective music teaching. J. Res. Music Educ. 2010, 58, 276–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krause, A.E.; Davidson, J.W. Effective educational strategies to promote life-long musical investment: Perceptions of educators. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kupers, E.; van Dijk, M.; van Geert, P. Within-teacher differences in one-to-one teacher–student interactions in instrumental music lessons. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2015, 37, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurkul, W.W. Nonverbal communication in one-to-one music performance instruction. Psychol. Music 2007, 35, 327–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Legette, R.M.; Royo, J. Pre-service music teacher perceptions of peer feedback. Res. Stud. Music Educ. 2021, 43, 22–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leijen, Ä.; Linde, R.; Kivestu, T. Perception of professional identity among the violin teachers of Estonian music schools. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 191, 1728–1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- López-Íñiguez, G.; Pozo, J.I. Analysis of constructive practice in instrumental music education: Case study with an expert cello teacher. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2016, 60, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Madsen, K.; Cassidy, J.W. The effect of focus of attention and teaching experience on perceptions of teaching effectiveness and student learning. J. Res. Music Educ. 2005, 53, 222–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MacLeod, R.B. The perceived effectiveness of nonverbal, co-verbal, and verbal string ensemble instruction: Student, teacher, and observer views. J. Music Teach. Educ. 2018, 27, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Millican, J.S.; Forrester, S.H. Music teacher rankings of selected core teaching practices. J. Music Teach. Educ. 2019, 29, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mills, J. Conservatoire students’ perceptions of the characteristics of effective instrumental and vocal tuition. Bull. Counc. Res. Music Educ. 2002, 153–154, 78–82. [Google Scholar]
- Napoles, J.; MacLeod, R.B. The influences of teacher delivery and student progress on preservice teachers’ perceptions of teaching effectiveness. J. Res. Music Educ. 2013, 61, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Powell, S.R.; Parker, E.C. Preservice music teachers’ descriptions of successful and unsuccessful teachers. J. Music Teach. Educ. 2017, 26, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Powell, S.R.; Weaver, M.A.; Henson, R.K. Relationship of preservice music teachers’ primary instrument background and teaching effectiveness in brass and woodwind techniques classes. J. Music Teach. Educ. 2018, 27, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regier, B.J. Examining relationships among concert band directors’ efficacious sources, self-efficacy for teaching strategies, and effective teaching skills. J. Res. Music Educ. 2021, 68, 436–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robinson, J.A. So many expectations: A study of Australian early-career secondary school music teachers. Res. Stud. Music Educ. 2022, 44, 86–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saygi, C.; Kirmizi, F.S. An evaluation of elementary and music teacher candidates’ perceptions of professional self-efficacy: The cases of Pamukkale and Adnan Menderes Universities. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 46, 3655–3659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schmidt, M. Mentoring and being mentored: The story of a novice music teacher’s success. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2008, 24, 635–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spieker, M.H. The Comparison of Novice and Master Instrumental Music Educators’ Use of Figurative Language and Their Attitudes Concerning It as a Tool for Effective Teaching. Res. Issues Music Educ. 2017, 13, 5. [Google Scholar]
- Stavrou, N.E. Looking at the ideal secondary school music teacher in Cyprus: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives. Music Educ. Res. 2020, 22, 346–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swanwick, K. The ‘good-enough’ music teacher. Br. J. Music Educ. 2008, 25, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Taylor, D.M.; Raadt, J.S. Gay-and straight-sounding auditory cues elicit stereotyping about teaching effectiveness. J. Res. Music Educ. 2021, 69, 62–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woody, R.H.; Gilbert, D.; Laird, L.A. Music teacher dispositions: Self-appraisals and values of university music students. J. Res. Music Educ. 2018, 66, 111–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klassen, R.M.; Tze, V.M.C. Teacher’s self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educ. Res. Rev. 2014, 12, 59–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 1997, 84, 191–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Steele, N.A. Three characteristics of effective teachers. Update Appl. Res. Music Educ. 2010, 28, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Author(S) | Year | Participants | Research Methodology | Factors/Variables Considered | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ayçiçek, B. [10] | 2021 | Turkish music preservice teachers (university students, n = 28) | Qualitative methodology (case study) | Preservice teachers’ beliefs about the role of critical thinking and training about this topic. | The possibility to attend a course on critical thinking helps students to develop critical thinking skills, to consider different point of views, and to reflect upon their academic and professional experiences. |
Baker, V. D. [11] | 2012 | American music educators (Texas) who worked in all the school grades of urban discricts (elementary, middle, and high school), n = 158 | Mixed-method (questionnaire as instrument, descriptive statistics for participants’ responses, analysis of open-ended questions) | Perceptions of urban music teachers’ characteristics (effective vs ineffective); future career plans; urban/suburban students’ characteristics, effective teachers’ factors of personality; challenges in teaching and methods for assessing success in music teaching | One of the main challenges (especially for novice teachers): classroom management. The possibility to encourage and support changes in students’ life as one of the main positive outcomes referred. Personal traits that sustained a long-term effective professional experience were passion for teaching music, beliefs of positive influence on students’ life, realistic educational goals, and psychological resilience. |
Ballantyne, J. [12] | 2007 | Australian novice music teachers (from 1 to 4 years of professional expertise), n = 76 respondents for the quantitative questionnaire, among them n = 15 were administered a more specific survey | Mixed-method (stage 1: questionnaire survey with quantitative descriptive analyses and means comparisons; stage 2: interviews with selected participants, qualitative analysis) | Teachers’ evaluation of effectiveness of preservice training courses; impact of educational and early-years professional experiences on the perceptions of music teaching effectiveness; educational needs emerged during preservice stage. | Three main themes have emerged for the impact of training course on effective teaching: contextualization of contents and skills (considering the reality of the music class); integration (of theory and practice and of general education and music education principles); continuity (from the training to the first professional experiences in the class). |
Ballantyne, J., Zhukov, K. [13] | 2017 | Australian novice music teachers (n = 14) | Qualitative survey (as a part of a wider mixed method research project): interviews and typological analysis of data | Professional identity of music teachers, motivation to become a music teacher, mentoring experiences, possible gaps between expectations and reality, self-efficacy in teaching music. | Music teachers’ professional identity includes aspects related to positive emotions (passion for music and professional satisfaction), engagement (effort for developing professionally and for encouraging students’ love for music), relationships (positive interactions with colleagues, students, and families), meaning (encouraging love for music as a main aim of music education), and achievements |
Biasutti, M., Concina, E. [14] | 2018 | Italian vocal and instrumental music teachers (n = 160) | Quantitative survey (questionnaire for data collection, correlation and regression analyses). | Music teachers’ professional self-efficacy, beliefs about learning and music ability, social skills. | Professional self-efficacy of music teachers seems to be influenced by the expression of some social behaviors (negative influence of assertiveness and expression of negative feelings), by the presence of beliefs of musical ability as incremental (positive influence) and of some personal and demographics characteristics, as gender and professional expertise (with women and more expert teachers expressing a higher level of self-efficacy). |
Biasutti, M., Concina, E., Deloughry C., Frate, S., Konkol, G., Mangiacotti, A., Rotar Pance, B., & Vidulin, S. [15] | 2021 | Music teachers from several European countries (Croatia, Ireland, Italy, Poland, Slovenia, UK, and others, n = 335) | Quantitative survey with a set of close-ended questionnaires (correlation and regression analysis as main statistical analysis | Professional self-efficacy of music teachers, motivation to professional activity, job satisfaction, resilience, coping strategies, and self-esteem. | A high level of teachers’ professional self-efficacy can be predicted by intrinsic motivation toward professional activity, resilience, coping strategies based on planning, and high level of self-esteem. Conversely, using coping strategies which are based on passive acceptance of stressful events may negatively affect the development of self-efficacy in teaching. |
Biasutti, M., Frate, S., Concina, E. [16] | 2019 | Italian vocal and instrumental in-service music teachers (n = 24) | Mixed research method (a quantitative close-ended questionnaire, and focus group and interview). | Impact of a blended training course for in-service music teachers on their professional development, professional expertise and teaching effectiveness. | The course seemed to be effective in promoting student-centered approach in music education, effective practices and teaching strategies |
Blackwell, J. [17] | 2020 | US expert instrumental music teachers (n = 2) | Qualitative methodology | Features of one-to-one relationship in music lessons which are typical of effective teaching. | One of the most frequent teacher’s behavior is side coaching; minor errors did not result in a stop of student’s performance, in order to give them the most relevant information maintaining high their motivation to learn. |
Burton, S L. [18] | 2011 | American and Swedish preservice music teachers | Qualitative study, based on a case study considering an international collaborative training course for preservice music teachers | Impact of the course on students’ academic experience, interpersonal and intercultural exchange and development of attitudes towards new strategies for music education. | The course proposed managed in promoting cultural awareness and a pedagogical attitude towards learner-centered approach among music students. |
Button, S. [19] | 2010 | English music teachers (n = 26) | Quantitative method (a close-end questionnaire made specifically for the study, with Likert-scale responses; statistical analysis with factorial analysis) | Teachers’ perceptions of the main aspects of the effective music teachers | The factorial analysis of the questionnaire revealed four kinds of teaching strategies, with references to the main approach music teachers showed in their music classes: pupil-orientated; evaluative orientated; management orientated; subject-orientated. |
Daniel, R., Parkes, K. [20] | 2015 | Instrumental music teachers (n = 171) from nine different countries (Finland, South Africa, US, Denmark, New Zealand, Sweden, Norway, England, and Australia) | Qualitative research method (interviews and content analysis of the responses) | Participants’ experience as music students: teacher–students relationships, learning cycle during first lessons, music learning in tertiary education, most influential teachers | The main teaching strategy is based on one-to-one tuition, with the support of other learning tasks (listening to expert performance, music ensemble lessons, and self-regulation in learning). Students considered as indicators of teaching expertise teacher’s pedagogical and performance skills: other relevant factors in an effective teachers are some personality traits, motivation and enthusiasm toward teaching music, and social skills. |
Howard, S. A., Seaver, K. J. [21] | 2013 | US novice music educators (n = 9) | Quantitative research method (a close-ended questionnaire) | Role of teacher’s interpersonal skills in music teaching: skills that can enhance music lessons and skills that could impair them. | After a training course on professional development, participants showed an enhancement of the social skills they considered crucial for teaching music classes. One of the main strategies used to encourage changes in this dimension is self-reflection upon the social and interpersonal component of their professional activity. |
Johnson, C., Williams, L., Parisi, J., Brunkan, M. [22] | 2016 | For the first stage of the study: an American expert teacher of swimming. For the second stage: an American instrumental music teacher | Case study with a qualitative methodology (analysis of videorecorded lessons and application of the most effective features to a musical setting) | Main features of an effective teaching cycle (instruction, behavior and feedback/reinforcement) | Applying the elements emerged in effective swimming lessons to music lessons, they were very effective in promoting a significative and quick learning process. Clear goals, focus on the procedures, immediate feedback and reinforcement and ignoring negative behaviors seem to be key point for an effective music lesson. |
Juchniewicz, J. [23] | 2010 | American music teachers (n = 40), 20 “exemplary teachers” and 20 “challenged teachers”, and expert music educators and preservice music teachers as external evaluators (n = 84) | Mixed method: participants filled in an open-ended questionnaire examining social intelligence in terms of correctness of understanding of social situations, and their teaching practices were rate by a panel of experts. | Social intelligence and its role in enhancing effective music teaching. | No significant differences emerged between “exemplary” and “challenged” teachers, meaning a similar level of social intelligence in the two groups. Expert raters considered social skills as one of the main aspects that can influenced their evaluation of teacher’s effectiveness. |
Krause, A. E., Davidson, J. W. [24] | 2018 | American, European, and Australian expert music educators (with more than 20 years of experience, n = 12) | Qualitative methodology (open ended interviews) | Practices for music learning which could emphasize the effort for a life-long learning music learning process. | Five main categories related to the role of music education and music educators in supporting a long-lasting effort in music learning have emerged. They are Understanding and using a range of music; Finding authentic voices; Strong, sensitive and attuned to provisional knowledge; Activating opportunity in learning; Engendering commitment. Effective music educators may promote all these aspects by encouraging in students the development of competence, relatedness, and autonomy in learning. |
Kupers, E., van Dijk, M., van Geert, P. [25] | 2015 | A Dutch expert music teacher and four students | quantitative methodology | Variations of teaching strategies in relation to the student in one-to-one tuition | When the teacher interacted with high-performing students, contingent scaffolding is more frequently used, and there was more variability in interpersonal interactions. |
Kurkul, W. W. [26] | 2007 | American music college teachers (n = 60) and their non-music major students | Quantitative method (an audio-visual test for measuring non-verbal sensitivity, a close-ended questionnaire for assessing effectiveness of the music lesson) | Relationships between music teacher’s non-verbal behaviors in music classes and the effectiveness of the lesson. | Non-verbal sensitivity of teachers, more than non-verbal behaviors, may positively influence the evaluation of music teaching effectiveness from students and external observers. |
Legette, R. M., Royo, J. [27] | 2021 | US music educators majors (n = 4) | Multiple case study with qualitative methodology | Influence of peer-feedback about music teaching on preservice music teachers effectiveness | Feedback received from the peers was considered more empathetic than those received from the professor. Receiving comments and hints from the colleagues was very useful for improving teaching competences and feeling socially supported. |
Leijen, A., Linde, R., Kivestu, T. [28] | 2015 | Estonian violin teachers (n = 58) | Quantitative research method (a close-ended questionnaire) | Teachers’ perceptions of their professional identity and reported teaching activity. | At the beginning of their professional career teachers seem to be more focused on the subject taught (subject-centered approach), then, while acquiring expertise, they shift to a more student-centered educational approach. |
López-Íñiguez, G., Pozo, J. I. [29] | 2016 | An expert Finnish cello teacher and a 7-year old student. | Case study with qualitative analysis of observative data (using the system for analyzing the practice of instrumental lessons) | Teacher’s conceptions about teaching and learning and the instructional practices she uses during the music lessons. | The teacher, in general, adopted a constructive approach, centered on the student. In some cases, she shifted to a more teacher-centered approach, with younger students who needed to be supported in the management of some learning and cognitive processes. In general, the conceptions of the teacher are coherent with her actions during the lessons. |
Madsen, K., & Cassidy, J. W. [30] | 2005 | US undergraduates and graduates music students (n = 78: 26 of junior level without teaching experience, 26 junior and senior level with some teaching experience, 26 graduates with full time experience in music teaching). | Mixed method: participants viewed the video-recordings of some music lessons and they have to rate the effectiveness of the teachers and the learning performance of students (quantitatively) and to comment both teacher’s and students’ behavior in class (qualitatively). | Perception of student teachers of other music teachers’ effectiveness in terms of instruction, delivery and classroom management, and students’ learning in terms of social and academic skills. | Role of expertise in assessing music teachers effectiveness: teachers with more expertise are more critical while evaluating their colleagues. Student teachers tended to focus more on teachers’ behavior than on students’ behavior while assessing teaching effectiveness. |
McLeod, R. B. [31] | 2018 | US undergraduate students (music and non-music), music teachers and external observers (respectively, n = 23, n = 2, n = 4) | Qualitative methodology: open end questions to the participants for assessing the perceived effectiveness of the instructional modes presented. | Effectiveness of three instructional modes in music instruction: non-verbal, co-verbal, and verbal | Five dimensions of effective music lessons emerged; they are related to specific instructions and feedback, delivery skills and eye contact, audible and focused co-verbal instruction prompts, conducting effectiveness, and ensemble progress. The verbal mode was considered the most effective, since it included feedback from the teacher. |
Millican, J. S., Forrester S. H. [32] | 2019 | US in-service K-12 music teachers (n = 898) | Mixed-method: a questionnaire with responses on Likert scale and open questions for assessing he relevance of teaching practices. | Definition of effective teaching practices in music according to the perception of music teachers. | One of the most relevant dimension in effective teaching is represented by the teacher–student relationship and the teacher’s sensitivity to students’ needs and problems. The teachers’ training is also important, specifically in the preservice phase. |
Mills, J. [33] | 2002 | English college music students (n = 182) | Qualitative method (questionnaire with open-end questions) | Students’ perception of the characteristics of effective music instruction(instrumental and vocal) | For both instrumental and vocal instruction, three effective teaching styles emerged: transmission, collaboration, and induction. |
Napoles, J., McLeod, R. B. [34] | 2013 | US preservice music teachers (n = 75) | Quantitative methodology: questions asking to rate on a Likert scale teacher’s effectiveness and students’ behavior in video recorded lessons. | Preservice teachers’ perception of teaching effectiveness considering four conditions (high delivery-high student’s progress, high delivery-low student’s progress, low delivery-low student’s progress, low delivery-high student’s progress) | Music students reported that they considered the high delivery conditions more effective, irrespective of students’ high or low progress in music learning. |
Powell, S. R., Weaver, M. A., Henson, R. K. [35] | 2018 | US preservice music teachers involving brass and woodwinds teaching courses (n = 135) | Quantitative methodology: participants’ teaching performance was recorded and assessed by some external judges on a quantitative rating scale. | Level of effectiveness of preservice music teachers considering skills related to instrument setup and tone production. | All the participants scored higher in teaching brass than teaching woodwinds (woodwind is probably a more varied category). Brass and woodwind players are judged more effective in teaching their main instrument than other instrumentalists teaching brasses or woodwinds. |
Powell, S. R., Parker, E. C. [36] | 2017 | US music educators majors (n = 134) | Qualitative methodology: participants are asked to write an essay with their beliefs about effective and ineffective music teachers | Preservice teachers’ ideas about effective and ineffective music teachers. | The main characteristics of effective teachers are related to interpersonal skills and knowledge-based competences. Abilities to personalized learning experiences considering the specific needs for each students are mentioned. Unsuccessful teachers have negative attitudes toward teaching, are not motivated and show no respect for students. |
Regier, B. J. [37] | 2021 | US band directors in high schools (n = 610) | Quantitative methodology: close ended questionnaires (with responses on Likert scale) | Teaching self-efficacy and possible relations with mastery experiences, verbal persuasions, vicarious experiences, and physiological state. Possible correlations between self-efficacy and self-perceptions of effective teaching. | Self-efficacy for teaching strategies seems influenced mainly by mastery experiences; then, on a minor level, by verbal persuasion, physiological state and vicarious experience. |
Robinson, J. A. [38] | 2022 | Australian novice music teachers (n = 59) | Qualitative methodology | Features related to motivation, stress, value of music teachers. | Motivational aspects are mainly related to students’ personal and artistical growth, success in lesson planning and opportunities for performance. Considering stressors, novice teachers referred a wide set of effective coping strategies for facing them. |
Saygi, C., Kirmizi, F. S. [39] | 2012 | Turkish university students who were studying for becoming primary or music teachers (primary teachers n = 227, music teachers n= 63) | Quantitative methodology | Preservice teachers’ self-efficacy in teaching | Preservice music teachers showed a higher level of perceived efficacy than primary music teachers. |
Schmidt, M. [40] | 2008 | A US novice music teacher | Qualitative case study | Role of mentorship relations with supervisors in enhancing teaching effectiveness in the musical field. | Three main dimensions could be identified in empowering teaching competences: the pedagogical style of the mentors, the integration of different strategies and educational model, the achievement of coherence between teaching knowledge and teaching practices. |
Spieker, M. H. [41] | 2017 | US novice and expert music teachers (n = 16) | Mixed methodology: analysis of language and analysis of frequencies. | Use of figurative language during verbal instruction in music lessons and its efficacy. | Expert music teachers used significantly more figurative language in music lessons than novice and student teachers. |
Stavrou, N. [42] | 2020 | Cypriot music students and teachers (respectively, n = 518, N = 71) | Mixed methodology (questionnaire with open- and close-ended questions) | Characteristics of effective music teachers | Students teachers considered dimensions related to personal traits and interpersonal aspects crucial in the teacher–student relationship; instead, in-service music teachers rated aspects related to pedagogical knowledge and teaching strategies as more important. |
Swanwick, K. [43] | 2008 | US music classes involved in the project Youth Music (n = 10) | Case study methodology | Musical and teaching abilities that are characteristics of music leaders. | Three main dimensions of teachers defined as good or effective: interest in music as human language, interest in students’ musical and personal development, attention to musical expressivity and fluency. |
Taylor, D. M., Raadt, J. S. [44] | 2021 | US music teachers (n = 575) | Quantitative study | Evaluations of teaching effectiveness based on some stereotypical features (namely the masculinity of the voice of male teachers) | The more masculine voices are rated as being more characterized by leadership, effective management of the class and wisdom. |
Woody, R. H., Gilbert, D., Laird, L. A. [45] | 2018 | US music preservice students (music majors, n = 110) | Quantitative study (with a close-end questionnaire for data collection) | Values attributed to four dimensions of effective music teacher related to reflectivity, empathy, musical comprehensiveness, and beliefs about musical learning and skills. | Older college students showed a great self-appraisal and valued the dimension of reflectivity, musical comprehensiveness and beliefs about musical learning more than their younger colleagues. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Concina, E. Effective Music Teachers and Effective Music Teaching Today: A Systematic Review. Educ. Sci. 2023, 13, 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020107
Concina E. Effective Music Teachers and Effective Music Teaching Today: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences. 2023; 13(2):107. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020107
Chicago/Turabian StyleConcina, Eleonora. 2023. "Effective Music Teachers and Effective Music Teaching Today: A Systematic Review" Education Sciences 13, no. 2: 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020107
APA StyleConcina, E. (2023). Effective Music Teachers and Effective Music Teaching Today: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 13(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020107