Assessment of the Impact of Distance Education on Students’ IQ

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report (Previous Reviewer 3)

The researchers did not comply with some of the required modifications:
* The abstract is reorganized by starting with the aim of the study, then the methodological procedures, then the results and some recommendations.
*The methodological procedures of the field study were not clearly explained, such as:
 1 - The methodology and method of the research were not explained accurately.
2- He did not clarify  the method and type of sample selection.
3 - The measurement tool  was not sufficiently described.
* It is better to include recommendations for the study.

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

we impoved the article arfter your suggestions.

 

 

Reviewer 2 Report (Previous Reviewer 2)

I appreciate author's efforts along with significant improvement. However, there are still some key points to improve. Authors need to check the writing carefully for the publish later. 

Regards,

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer.

Thank you for your suggestions. We imporved the article.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The introduction needs to be rewritten: firstly, it is very long in volume and overloaded with theoretical material; secondly, it is necessary to add the objectives of the study, research objectives and possible hypotheses;

Add a section "Methodology", where to describe in detail the methods of conducting the experiment, its main stages, and so on.

Add section "Limitations of the study"

I also consider it necessary to add a section with the approximate title of ethical standards, because we are talking about the study of mental abilities.

Reviewer 2 Report

This research in very interesting along with a lot of analysis. However, I hope author(s) need to continue to improve,

-- Structure of this articles

-- Academic writing to clarify your statements.

-- Articles in Reference need to be revised。 Many articles used different formats such as title, year vol....

-- Need to check what and how to report your results, such as significances 

-- Clarify your research method, for example, populations, sampling/participants, you need to introduce more about them, e.g. when and where

I hope you could continue to revise it. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The research needs to be scrutinized and deepened in content, especially in clarifying the methodological procedures of the study and discussing the results.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf