Next Article in Journal
Integrating Augmented Reality, Gamification, and Serious Games in Computer Science Education
Previous Article in Journal
Feminist Academic Activism in English Language Teaching: The Need to Study Discourses on Femininities Critically
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effective Modeling on Learning Ballet Online

Educ. Sci. 2023, 13(6), 617; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060617
by Jeongwon Kim 1,2, Iseul Jo 1,2, Younha Ma 1,2, Hyewon Yoon 1,2 and Dongwon Yook 2,3,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Educ. Sci. 2023, 13(6), 617; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060617
Submission received: 25 April 2023 / Revised: 2 June 2023 / Accepted: 10 June 2023 / Published: 16 June 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This a very interesting way to study learnings techniques, even if it is a very specific discipline, dance and motor learning. The article should contain a remark in methodology about the need to read the results carefully because the number of cases is low.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This manuscript is very well written, very interesting, and the experimental design is also very reasonable. Here are a few arguments for the author's reference:

1. The study method did not specify the definition of hip, knee and ankle measurements.

2. The results of this study do not state whether the data are normally distributed.

3. It is not stated what actions the hip, knee and ankle positive and negative values in Table 3.

4. There are two tables 3 in the manuscript.

5. In the research method, it is stated that 26 female college students participated in this research. Why is there male data in Table 3?

6. No limitations of this study are listed.

7. Only 3 references are from the past three years, and the other references are too old. It is recommended that the author consult newer and more recent literature.

Author Response

첨부 파일을 참조하십시오

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

I congratulate the authors for investing in a work of these characteristics because it is difficult to avoid some noise, since it is difficult to isolate some variables in an interactive pedagogical process. In general terms, I consider that the effort they made was successful.

Taking into account the difficulties inherent in this type of investigation, I make the following suggestions for improvement:

In the Methods

1. Participants

Specify sample mean age and standard deviation

2 Task and Apparatus

2.1. task

Explain further how they created the scorecard and how the experts validated it

I also consider that it is necessary to include, in an explicit and developed way, a point about the limitations of the study. This point is very important because it helps to contextualize the difficulties of this type of research and gives specific indications of how the conclusions can be used.´

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop