Strategies for Integrating Generative AI into Higher Education: Navigating Challenges and Leveraging Opportunities
Abstract
:1. Introduction and Aim of the Paper
2. What Is GenAI?
3. GenAI in HE
4. Responsible Integration of GenAI in HE: Experts’ Recommendations
- Awareness of the coming disruptive change—This is not hype or a minor Information Communication Technology (ICT) change. Moreover, some have posited that humanity stands on the precipice of what could be considered the most significant technological upheaval in recorded history. Considering this perspective, it becomes imperative for the management and faculty of academic institutions to cultivate a profound understanding of the transformative potential that GenAI applications present to pedagogical methodologies, learning paradigms, and scholarly research. This burgeoning awareness will necessitate a careful formulation of a comprehensive institutional strategy, which specifically entails the development of a policy framework for integrating GenAI applications into the academic milieu along with a recalibrated design of academic programs. Such strategic planning should also allocate necessary resources to support the seamless adoption and integration of GenAI technologies into educational and research activities.
- Training faculty—As with any ICT change, the onus of incorporating GenAI into the academic curriculum rests squarely upon the shoulders of teaching staff, underscoring the critical need to enhance a faculty‘s proficiency in these emergent technologies. However, the changes GenAI tools provide are never seen before, so it is essential to cultivate a comprehensive understanding among educators of the capabilities and limitations of GenAI tools. Therefore, faculty members should be encouraged to actively immerse themselves in AI technology, thereby expanding and enriching their domain-specific knowledge and pedagogical strategies. Efforts to augment a faculty’s expertise in GenAI can be directed through various professional development initiatives. These initiatives may include the organization of workshops designed to foster practical skills and theoretical knowledge, the formation of discussion groups that facilitate peer-to-peer learning and exchange of insights, personalized training sessions tailored to individual learning needs, and the distribution of instructional materials that guide the effective integration of GenAI in teaching. Additionally, sharing successful case studies and experiences can serve as a valuable resource, illustrating the transformative potential of GenAI in enhancing educational outcomes. Such multifaceted approaches to faculty development not only equip educators with the necessary tools to navigate the complexities of GenAI but also ensure that they are well-positioned to lead their students through the evolving landscape of digital and AI literacy.
- Changing teaching and assessment practices—Within the realm of HE, the lecture-based model of instruction continues to predominate. This model is characterized by the dissemination of knowledge to large cohorts of students who typically assume the role of passive recipients tasked with the absorption of presented information. Despite its longstanding presence as a foundational element of academic instruction, the effectiveness of this pedagogical approach is increasingly being called into question, particularly when contrasted with methodologies that promote active engagement and facilitate the development of higher-order cognitive skills. With the advent of the GenAI tools, a continuous pedagogical strategy shift is needed. A strategy that places students at the center of the educational experience, engaging them in authentic problem-solving activities, data analysis, decision-making processes, collaborative endeavors with peers, and producing concrete outputs that encapsulate their learning journey is required. In the domain of student assessment, many educational institutions continue to favor conventional testing mechanisms, which predominantly assess memorization and recall abilities, often at the expense of evaluating the practical application of knowledge and skills. Educational stakeholders have an imperative to ensure that assessment methodologies are congruent with the articulated learning objectives. They should advocate for a diversification of evaluation practices. Such an approach does not merely encourage the acquisition of knowledge through memorization but also fosters deep understanding, critical analysis, and the ability to apply learning in varied contexts. It is necessary to acknowledge that the call for these transformative approaches in teaching and assessment practices is not a direct consequence of the emergence of GenAI. Nonetheless, the advent of the GenAI era undeniably amplifies the urgency for adopting these educational reforms, highlighting the necessity for HEIs to evolve in response to the changing landscape of knowledge acquisition and application in the 21st century.
- Students as co-partners with faculty—An understanding of the technological transformation of GenAI and its implications for academia should be shared with the younger generation, namely, students. The active involvement of students is not just about familiarizing them with new technologies; it is also about empowering them to be proactive participants in their education and future. Integrating GenAI into academic learning and teaching is not just a matter of keeping pace with technological advancements; instead, it is a strategic imperative for preparing students for the future, enhancing their learning experiences, fostering critical and ethical reasoning, and encouraging innovation and creativity.
- Imparting learning literacies adapted to the GenAI era—In the contemporary education landscape, a robust foundation in AI literacy must be laid for students. This foundation includes the provision of a comprehensive set of knowledge, skills, and competencies essential for navigating the complexities of the AI ecosystem with acumen and discernment. Consequently, there is a necessity for educators not only to elucidate the operational mechanisms of AI applications but also to emphasize the importance of students engaging with these technologies while equipped with a preliminary framework of critical thinking specific to the explored content area. Such a pedagogical strategy will ensure that learners become adept at evaluating the veracity and quality of information obtained through AI tools, thereby cultivating indispensable skills requisite for thriving in a society increasingly interwoven with AI technologies. These skills include but are not limited to critical thinking, enhanced cognitive capabilities, creativity, and the capacity for original thought. Furthermore, it is fallacious to believe that students have the innate power to navigate the ethical quandaries associated with GenAI applications. Consequently, there is a pressing need to integrate ethical reasoning and principles of academic integrity within the educational curriculum. This integration would not only enrich the students’ academic journey but also prepare them to confront and address the moral and ethical challenges that are intrinsic to the deployment and utilization of GenAI technologies in various aspects of life.
- Applied research is needed—Research constitutes the cornerstone of scholarly pursuits, embodying the essence of academic inquiry and advancement. The emergence of GenAI does not detract from the imperative for sustained research within this domain. Nonetheless, given the constrained temporal framework for research currently available, there is a pressing need to prioritize applied research endeavors. Specifically, these endeavors entail a rigorous investigation into the practical application and tangible implementation of GenAI-enhanced pedagogical methodologies juxtaposed against conventional educational practices. Such empirical studies are instrumental in elucidating the substantive contributions of GenAI technologies to the educational field. The insights from this research will play a pivotal role in informing the strategic planning and responsible execution of transformative changes in the design and delivery of learning and teaching processes. Through this analytical lens, the academic community can navigate the integration of GenAI based on a foundation of evidence-based understanding, ensuring that technological advancements are leveraged to thoughtfully and effectively enhance educational outcomes in teaching and assessment practices.
- GenAI Novice Stage: This initial adoption phase is characterized by minimal utilization of GenAI tools. During this stage, it is imperative to foster a sense of curiosity among faculty members regarding the potential benefits that can be derived from engaging with GenAI technologies. Examples of activities that can be undertaken to this end include leveraging these technologies for tasks such as composing emails or facilitating brainstorming sessions. Furthermore, there is a pressing need to cultivate an awareness of the urgency of adopting GenAI technologies. This sense of immediacy stems from a recognition that a failure to integrate such advancements may swiftly result in a loss of relevance within the rapidly evolving technological landscape.
- GenAI as a Utility: In the secondary phase of adoption, GenAI assumes the role of a supplementary instrument employed for distinct tasks. During this stage, faculty members will appreciate the advantages offered by tools such as ChatGPT, incorporating them into their daily routines. For instance, GenAI may be harnessed to generate high-quality content or to provide support in project management endeavors, thus facilitating the acquisition of new competencies, such as the power to produce quality academic writing.
- GenAI as a Co-Pilot: At this level, GenAI functions as a strategic tool, guiding decision-making in the teaching process and serving as a support assistant that analyzes data to guide decision-making strategies. This is a significant change from the previous level because users are handing over tasks to AI. At this stage, faculty members should be encouraged to develop a concept of “delegating powers” to GenAI to “free up” their time for tasks where human users have an advantage over AI. Ideally, each faculty member should be required to select a task that can be “delegated” to AI.
- Transformative GenAI: This is the highest level of the GenAI adoption process. At this level of adoption, GenAI is deeply rooted in teaching strategies and methodologies, changing them significantly. For example, research processes can be redefined using chatbots powered by AI, providing immediate and personalized responses. This level of integration challenges users to reimagine their role as instructors. This level opens the way to a future where GenAI changes the world and existing roles and even creates new roles. At this stage, developing a “growth mindset” is necessary, which means looking for opportunities to create values that could not be created without AI and adopting the new values. Faculty members must be encouraged to exploit opportunities to experience the challenges of uncertainty and urgent changes.
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
- Expand empirical bases: Research needs to be conducted across a broader array of HE institutions worldwide to understand the challenges and opportunities GenAI presents.
- Technical deep dives: A more detailed technical analysis of GenAI tools is needed better to understand their capabilities and limitations in educational contexts.
- Longitudinal studies: Long-term studies are needed to assess GenAI’s impact on learning outcomes, student engagement, and career readiness over time.
- Model development: Further develop and empirically test the proposed GenAI adoption model in various HE settings to refine it into a responsible institutional guiding process.
- Policy and ethical considerations: The policy implications and ethical concerns surrounding the use of GenAI in HE need to be further examined.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Crawford, J.; Cowling, M.; Allen, K.A. Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence (AI). J. Univ. Teach. Learn. Pract. 2023, 20, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beerbaum, D.O. Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) ethics taxonomy-applying Chat GPT for robotic process automation (GAI-RPA) as business case. SSRN Electron. J. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larsen, B.; Narayan, J. Generative AI, a game-changer that society and industry need to be ready for. In Proceedings of the World Economic Forum, Davos, Switzerland, 6–8 January 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Carlopio, J. A history of social psychological reactions to new technology. J. Occup. Psychol. 1988, 61, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baidoo-Anu, D.; Owusu, A.L. Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (ai): Understanding the potential benefits of chatgpt in promoting teaching and learning. SSRN Electron. J. 2023, 7, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filgueiras, F. Artificial intelligence and education governance. Educ. Citizsh. Soc. Justice 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mladan, J.; Campbell, M. Generative. Generative artificial intelligence: Trends and prospects. Computer 2022, 55, 107–112. [Google Scholar]
- AI-Principles Overview. OECD.AI. Available online: https://oecd.ai/en/principles (accessed on 12 December 2023).
- Torricelli, M.; Martino, M.; Baronchelli, A.; Aiello, L. The role of interface design on prompt-mediated creativity in Generative AI. arXiv 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durate, F. Number of ChatGPT Users (February 2024). Available online: https://explodingtopics.com/blog/chatgpt-users (accessed on 1 March 2024).
- Broz, M. Midjourney statistics (February 2024). 2023. Available online: https://photutorial.com/midjourney-statistics/ (accessed on 12 December 2023).
- Cao, Y.; Li, S.; Liu, Y.; Yan, Z.; Dai, Y.; Yu, P.S.; Sun, L. A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT. arXiv 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López-Chila, R.; Llerena-Izquierdo, J.; Sumba-Nacipucha, N.; Cueva-Estrada, J. Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: An Analysis of Existing Bibliometrics. Educ. Sci. 2023, 14, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lacey, M.M.; Smith, D.P. Teaching and assessment of the future today: Higher education and AI. Microbiol. Aust. 2023, 44, 124–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dickey, E.; Bejarano, A.; Garg, C. Innovating Computer Programming Pedagogy: The AI-Lab Framework for Generative AI Adoption. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2308.12258. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, W.; Lin, X.; Feng, F.; He, X.; Chua, T.S. Generative recommendation: Towards next-generation recommender paradigm. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2304.03516. [Google Scholar]
- Chernenko, O. Modern pedagogical technologies in higher education. Pedagog. Educ. Manag. Rev. 2020, 2, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lizzio, A.; Wilson, K. Action learning in higher education: An investigation of its potential to develop professional capability. Stud. High. Educ. 2004, 29, 469–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veiga, S.A.; Flores, M.A. Student-centred methods in higher education: Implications for student learning and professional development. Int. J. Learn. 2010, 2, 207–218.–218. [Google Scholar]
- Sweller, J. In Academe, What is Learned, and How is it Learned? Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2015, 24, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tahiru, F. AI in education: A systematic literature review. J. Cases Inf. Technol. 2021, 23, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zawacki-Richter, O.; Marín, V.I.; Bond, M.; Gouverneur, F. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators? Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 2019, 16, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, M.; Abdel-Haq, M.K. Bibliographical analysis of artificial intelligence learning in Higher Education: Is the role of the human educator and educated a thing of the past? In Fostering Communication and Learning with Underutilized Technologies in Higher Education; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2021; pp. 36–52. [Google Scholar]
- Okonkwo, C.W.; Ade-Ibijola, A. Chatbots applications in education: A systematic review. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell. 2021, 2, 100033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dwivedi, Y.K.; Kshetri, N.; Hughes, L.; Slade, E.L.; Jeyaraj, A.; Kar, A.K.; Baabdullah, A.M.; Koohang, A.; Raghavan, V.; Ahuja, M.; et al. So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2023, 71, 102642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barrett, A.; Pack, A. Not quite eye to AI: Student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 2023, 20, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, C.K.Y.; Hu, W. Students' Voices on Generative AI: Perceptions, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Education. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2305.00290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, C.K.Y.; Lee, K.K. The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and Millennial Generation teachers? arXiv 2023, arXiv:2305.02878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Markauskaite, L.; Marrone, R.; Poquet, O.; Knight, S.; Martinez-Maldonado, R.; Howard, S.; Tondeur, J.; De Laat, M.; Buckingham Shum, S.; Gasevic, D.; et al. Rethinking the entwinement between artificial intelligence and human learning: What capabilities do learners need for a world with AI? Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell. 2022, 3, 100056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pellas, N. The influence of sociodemographic factors on students' attitudes toward AI-generated video content creation. Smart Learn. Environ. 2023, 10, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, C.S.; Mascarenhas, J.M.; Bhatt, S.; Rodrigues, S.S.; Almeida, R.S.S. College Students' Perceptions on Articifical Intelligence (AI) in Mangaluru Educational Settings. SJCC Manag. Res. Rev. 2023, 13, 68–79. [Google Scholar]
- Tajik, E.; Tajik, F. A comprehensive examination of the potential application of Chat GPT in higher education institutions (Version 1). TechRxiv 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malmström, H.; Stöhr, C.; Ou, A.W. Chatbots and other AI for learning: A survey of use and views among university students in Sweden. Chalmers Stud. Commun. Learn. High. Educ. 2023, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amzalag, M.; Kurtz, G. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in Higher Education: Uses, Perceptions, and Ethical Dilemmas of Students. unpublished.
- Johri, A.; Katz, A.S.; Qadir, J.; Hingle, A. Generative Artificial Intelligence and engineering education. J. Eng. Educ. 2023, 112, 572–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Obaydi, L.H.; Pikhart, M.; Klimova, B. ChatGPT and the General Concepts of Education: Can Artificial Intelligence-Driven Chatbots Support the Process of Language Learning? Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 2023, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puri, A.; Baskara, F.R. Enhancing pragmatic knowledge with ChatGPT: Benefits and considerations. Pros. Konf. Linguist. Tah. Atma Jaya (KOLITA) 2023, 21, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walczak, K.; Cellary, W. Challenges for higher education in the era of widespread access to Generative AI. Econ. Bus. Rev. 2023, 9, 71–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beck, S.W.; Levine, S.R. Backtalk: ChatGPT: A powerful technology tool for writing instruction. Phi Delta Kappan 2023, 105, 66–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mondal, H.; Mondal, S. ChatGPT in academic writing: Maximizing its benefits and minimizing the risks. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2023, 71, 3600–3606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiao, Y.; Zhi, Y. An exploratory study of EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT for language learning tasks: Experience and perceptions. Languages 2023, 8, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, W.; Lin, J.; Jin, H.; Li, T.; Tsai, Y.S.; Gašević, D.; Chen, G. Can large language models provide feedback to students? A case study on ChatGPT. In In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Orem, UT, USA, 10–13 July 2023; pp. 323–325. [Google Scholar]
- Cotton, D.R.; Cotton, P.A.; Shipway, J.R. Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 2023, 61, 228–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zohny, H.; McMillan, J.; King, M. Ethics of generative AI. J. Med. Ethics 2023, 49, 79–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Akgun, S.; Greenhow, C. Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI Ethics 2022, 2, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Muscanell, N.; Robert, J. EDUCAUSE QuickPoll Results: Did ChatGPT Write this Report? (14 February 2023). EDUCASE. Available online: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2023/2/educause-quickpoll-results-did-chatgpt-write-this-report? (accessed on 1 March 2024).
- Sullivan, M.; Kelly, A.; McLaughlan, P. ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning. J. Appl. Learn. Teach. 2023, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amani, S.; White, L.; Balart, T.; Arora, L.; Shryock, K.J.; Brumbelow, K.; Watson, K.L. Generative AI perceptions: A survey to measure the perceptions of faculty, staff, and students on generative AI tools in academia. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2304.14415. [Google Scholar]
- Sok, S.; Heng, K. ChatGPT for education and research: A review of benefits and risks. SSRN Electron. J. 2023, 3, 110–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tlili, A.; Shehata, B.; Adarkwah, M.A.; Bozkurt, A.; Hickey, D.T.; Huang, R.; Agyemang, B. What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learn. Environ. 2023, 10, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, M.; Akiri, C.; Aryal, K.; Parker, E.; Praharaj, L. From chatgpt to threatgpt: Impact of generative ai in cybersecurity and privacy. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 80218–80245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bali, M.M.E.I.; Kumalasani, M.P.; Yunilasari, D. Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Perspicacity Relation between Educators and Students. J. Innov. Educ. Cult. Res. 2022, 3, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrara, E. GenAI against humanity: Nefarious applications of generative artificial intelligence and large language models. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2310.00737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kitchen, K. AI Is a National Security Lifeline, House Armed Services Committee Subcommittee on Cyber, Innovative Technologies, and Information Systems. United States of America. 2023. Available online: https://policycommons.net/artifacts/4511673/ai-is-a-national-security-lifeline/5321373/ (accessed on 10 February 2024).
- George, A.S. The Potential of Generative AI to Reform Graduate Education. Partn. Univers. Int. Res. J. 2023, 2, 36–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bogert, E.; Schecter, A.; Watson, R.T. Humans rely more on algorithms than social influence as a task becomes more difficult. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 8028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cao, S.; Huang, C.M. Understanding User Reliance on AI in Assisted Decision-Making. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2022, 6, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lund, B.D.; Wang, T. Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library HiTech News 2023, 40, 26–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- LaGrandeur, K. How safe is our reliance on AI, and should we regulate it? AI Ethics 2021, 1, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jakesch, M.; Buçinca, Z.; Amershi, S.; Olteanu, A. How different groups prioritize ethical values for responsible AI. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability, and Transparency, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 21–24 June 2022; pp. 310–323. [Google Scholar]
- Maathuis, C. On the Road to Designing Responsible AI Systems in Military Cyber Operations. Eur. Conf. Cyber Warf. Secur. 2022, 21, 170–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Díaz-Rodríguez, N.; Del Ser, J.; Coeckelbergh, M.; de Prado, M.L.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F. Connecting the dots in trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI principles, ethics, and key requirements to responsible AI systems and regulation. Inf. Fusion 2023, 99, 101896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kurtz, G.; Amzalag, M.; Shaked, N.; Zaguri, Y.; Kohen-Vacs, D.; Gal, E.; Zailer, G.; Barak-Medina, E. Strategies for Integrating Generative AI into Higher Education: Navigating Challenges and Leveraging Opportunities. Educ. Sci. 2024, 14, 503. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050503
Kurtz G, Amzalag M, Shaked N, Zaguri Y, Kohen-Vacs D, Gal E, Zailer G, Barak-Medina E. Strategies for Integrating Generative AI into Higher Education: Navigating Challenges and Leveraging Opportunities. Education Sciences. 2024; 14(5):503. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050503
Chicago/Turabian StyleKurtz, Gila, Meital Amzalag, Nava Shaked, Yanay Zaguri, Dan Kohen-Vacs, Eran Gal, Gideon Zailer, and Eran Barak-Medina. 2024. "Strategies for Integrating Generative AI into Higher Education: Navigating Challenges and Leveraging Opportunities" Education Sciences 14, no. 5: 503. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050503
APA StyleKurtz, G., Amzalag, M., Shaked, N., Zaguri, Y., Kohen-Vacs, D., Gal, E., Zailer, G., & Barak-Medina, E. (2024). Strategies for Integrating Generative AI into Higher Education: Navigating Challenges and Leveraging Opportunities. Education Sciences, 14(5), 503. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050503