Next Article in Journal
I Should Only Use One Language”: A Case Study of Spanish-Speaking Emergent Bilingual Students’ Translanguaging Experiences in a Middle School Science Classroom
Previous Article in Journal
Is Intrinsic Motivation Related to Lower Stress among University Students? Relationships between Motivation for Enrolling in a Study Program, Stress, and Coping Strategies
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Credibility Judgments in Higher Education: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Detecting Misinformation from University Instructors

Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(8), 852; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080852
by Katie Corbitt, Karen Hiltbrand, Madison Coursen, Soren Rodning, W. Brandon Smith and Don Mulvaney *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(8), 852; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080852
Submission received: 14 June 2024 / Revised: 30 July 2024 / Accepted: 30 July 2024 / Published: 7 August 2024

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I suggested that the authors of the article address the ambiguity by expanding the methodology section to provide more details about how the questionnaire was constructed within the context of the conceptual framework and to elucidate the data analysis process. The authors responded that they have addressed the ambiguity regarding the development of the questionnaire in the modified methodology section. However, it is still not sufficiently expanded to provide a deep understanding of the instrument. The dimensions tested in the questionnaire should be clearly included and justified in the text. Therefore, additional tables should be included in the Materials and Methods section to better describe the research instruments used. Furthermore, the data analysis process, including codification and other relevant steps, is not described in this section.

Do not use bold and capital letters for codes "CONNECTIONS, USEFUL, PERSPECTIVE, EXPOSURE, AWARENESS" but instead use inverted commas.

Author Response

please see the attached

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

please refer to the comments/suggestions in the article

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

please see attached

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop