Next Article in Journal
Carbon Electrode Modified with Molecularly Imprinted Polymers for the Development of Electrochemical Sensor: Application to Pharmacy, Food Safety, Environmental Monitoring, and Biomedical Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigating the Metallic Nanoparticles Decoration on Reduced Graphene Oxide-Based Sensors Used to Detect Sulfur Dioxide
Previous Article in Journal
Electrochemical vs. Optical Biosensors for Point-of-Care Applications: A Critical Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gas-Sensing Properties of Graphene Functionalized with Ternary Cu-Mn Oxides for E-Nose Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Contamination- and Perturbation-Free Fluorescent Monitoring of Zn2+ in Suspensions Using Crown Ether-Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticles

1
Department of Organic Chemistry and Technology, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Szent Gellért tér 4, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary
2
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Semmelweis University, Hőgyes Endre utca 9, H-1092 Budapest, Hungary
3
Centre for Energy Research, Konkoly-Thege Miklós út 29-33, H-1121 Budapest, Hungary
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Chemosensors 2023, 11(10), 547; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11100547
Submission received: 27 August 2023 / Revised: 12 October 2023 / Accepted: 20 October 2023 / Published: 22 October 2023

Abstract

:
This study aims to introduce a fluorescence-based chemosensing method for Zn2+ in aqueous suspensions and untreated surface waters, conditions which generally hinder the application of conventional optochemical sensing platforms. A macrocyclic fluoroionophore was covalently bonded to a silica-coated magnetic nanoparticle and applied according to a predetermined protocol for analyzing trace amounts of Zn2+ under rarely investigated conditions. Utilizing the reversible complexation of the immobilized fluoroionophore, rapid regeneration was carried out via simple acidification after the magnetic-assisted solid-phase extraction of the particles. Forming inclusion complexes with Zn2+ with the receptor units of the particles leads to a significant enhancement in fluorescence intensity at 370 nm, above the detection limit of 5 ppb, with a dynamic linear range of quantification of 15–3000 ppb in a pH range of 5.5–7.5. Practical applicability was confirmed by analyzing untreated river water and an aqueous suspension of pumpkin seed flour as real and relevant heterogeneous multicomponent samples of predetermined sample composition and natural Zn2+ content. Our practical approach aims to broaden the applicability range of optochemical sensing platforms for Zn2+.

1. Introduction

The contamination of samples with sensor molecules or the presence of perturbation-causing physical contaminants (precipitates, insoluble particles in suspensions, colloids, etc.) can hold back the potential of optochemical sensing among analytical techniques. Sensor molecules are usually immobilized to solid carriers to overcome these limitations [1,2,3]. One favorable option is anchoring them to magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs), which also provides a simple magnetic facilitated recovery [4]. Following these considerations, we decided to covalently attach a Zn2+-selective fluorescent macrocycle to the surface of a silica-coated MNP to gain a multiple-use chemosensing platform for Zn2+. We intended to focus especially on suspensions and untreated surface water samples, as their investigation is considered as the bottleneck of ion-selective optochemical analysis by using conventional optode devices (i.e., membrane, optical fiber, flow-through, film and waveguide optodes). In the cases of the mentioned types of optodes, the presence of physical contaminants—i.e., large particles, sand, slurry, macromolecular contaminants, etc.—can hinder applicability, as these contaminants tend to cover the active signaling sites, thus partially blocking the way of light on the source or detector side.
Zn2+ plays a crucial role in biology [5]; thus, many selective applications have been developed for its determination in various samples [6,7]. However, most of them lack appropriate selectivity, especially in distinguishing Cd2+ and Zn2+, owing to their quite similar properties and usual copresence in nature [8]. Compared to the most commonly investigated slightly contaminated aqueous samples, optical chemosensing in heterogeneous solid–liquid systems, like real soil samples or suspensions, is more challenging, and would present great potential [8]. Although the typical concentration of Zn2+ in groundwater is around 0.04 ppm, the concentration in drinking water is usually higher due to plumbing networks [9]. From the aspect of sensor development, the limit of detection (LOD) of the new applications should meet the permissible Zn2+ concentration in drinking water, which is currently 5 ppm [9]. The rising industrial activities inevitably cause an increased Zn2+ content in rivers and soils, which can reach 20 and 500 ppm, respectively [10,11].
The benefits of combining the advantageous selectivity of supramolecular interactions and the specific surface properties of nanomaterials are well-known and lead to the development of numerous useful tools, both for academia and industry [12,13,14,15,16,17]. Combining nanostructural carriers and molecular cages simultaneously provides the regenerability, separability, high surface area, adsorption capacity, etc. [12,13,14,15,16,17]. Crown ethers are among the oldest synthetic receptors. Despite their less advanced selectivity compared to that of 21st-century sensor molecule alternatives, they are still widely used due to their structural simplicity and better availability. They have also been used for several decades in ion-selective optochemical sensing. In the case of the first generation of optodes, crown ethers had the role of selectoionophores, while optical signals were induced via the indirect protonation process of a chromoionophore at the same time [18]. As the proposed sensor molecule contains the fluorophore as a subunit of its coordination sphere, it can perform both molecular recognition and direct-type optical signaling. The advantage of using the ion-selective macrocycles instead of the most commonly applied introduction of simple functional groups in the particle surface is their improved selectivity. It is attributed not only to the lack of size-, shape- and polarity-specific molecular cages, but also to the occurrence of only charge-driven intermolecular interactions with simple functionalized surfaces. Polar functional groups on the particle surface, especially negatively charged ones (i.e., –COO, –S), can coordinate not only competing cations with the same chemical character and charge, but unfortunately, they also provide unspecific binding sites for various contaminants in the samples (organic content, physical contaminants containing biomolecules, natural surfactants, etc.) in contrast to neutral crown ethers as stereoelectronic host molecules with a multipoint binding ability. However, it is also true that macrocycle-functionalized nanoparticles are naturally more expensive due to the need for preparing receptor units and their difficult subsequent immobilization on the surface, while the introducible number of binding sites would be far behind that provided by simple surface functional groups.
Surface functionalization plays a critical role in this type of application, as the chemical properties as well as the number of ligands and functional groups on the surface of the NPs largely influence their charge, dispersibility, and colloidal stability, as well as the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity, processability, and interactions with the medium [19]. Furthermore, suitable functional groups or coatings on NPs enable the controlled functionalization via covalent binding of functional molecules, such as crown ethers, as synthetic receptors capable of providing molecular recognition. We used a commercially available silica-coated MNP as a prefunctionalized core of the sensing unit. For further modification, we applied an upgraded specific version of a reported method, which was successfully used previously in our research group for functionalizing silica gel surfaces with crown ethers [20]. In the context of the present work, we also proved that this method is suitable for the surface modification of silica-coated MNPs—not only for spherical silica gels—by providing a molecular linker of a proper length (3 C-C-bond-length) for preserving optimal complexing properties. It was also important to consider that the applied functionalized NPs needed to show proper colloidal stability in water, even after post-coating modifications, besides providing the unchanged complexation of the receptor. To preserve the relatively sensitive sensor molecule in its original form, mild reaction conditions should be applied for the chemical modification of the MNP surface. Furthermore, allowing for bioanalytical applicability and the minimization of unspecific adsorption sites without any further surface passivation strategies—which might cause the inactivity of the receptor—were also required [19,21]. This means avoiding the introduction of a large number of highly polar, especially negatively charged, functional groups, which can coordinate several cations without a predetermined selectivity. The proposed silica-coated core was previously applied many times while satisfying the former essential requirements [22,23,24,25,26,27].
Due to the enhanced importance of rapid chemosensing and the inherent advantages of fluorescent detection, recent research shows tremendous growth in the number of published papers focusing on the fluorescent detection of Zn2+ [28,29]. Among them, the following can be highlighted in the context of the present paper:
Kim et al. reported a naphthylamide- and Fe3O4-containing NP for the selective detection of Zn2+ [8]. The NP had a naphthalimide and a dipicrylamine moiety as the Zn2+-coordinating subunit and catechol-linked Fe3O4 as the magnetic core. A weak fluorescence was obtained at 527 nm upon excitation at 370 nm in DMSO-HEPES buffer, while the presence of Zn2+ induced the fluorescence enhancement. The NP was exploited for the detection and removal of Zn2+ from soil samples [8].
Li et al. reported a new fluorescent and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopic dual-mode Zn2+ probe based on a modified gold NP [30]. Since Zn2+ caused the self-aggregation of the particles and a parallel fluorescence enhancement at 425 nm, it enabled a selective chemosensing application, even the detection of the distribution of Zn2+ in single cells, with an excellent biocompatibility and low cytotoxicity [30].
A BODIPY-based Zn2+-selective fluorescence sensor was developed by Jia et al. [31]. The N,N-di(pyridin-2-ylmethyl)-ethane-1,2-diamine group provided a binding site for Zn2+. In the absence of Zn2+, fluorescent monomers self-assembled to form NPs, which resulted in a quenched fluorescence via aggregation. In the presence of Zn2+, it coordinated to the aggregates, resulting in a returned fluorescence at 600 nm (while excited at 573 nm) [31].
Wu et al. reported a fluorescent Ag2S quantum dot, which emitted at 1100 nm (excitation at 480 nm) [32]. In this case, the Ag2S nanocrystals with n-dodecylmercaptan-linked thioglycolic acid functions could act as monodisperse spherical NPs in water, turning on a fluorescent response for Zn2+. Upon the addition of Zn2+, it binds to the thioglycolic acids on the particle surface, thereby forming a Zn-mercapto-derivative as a complex passivation shell on the surface of the Ag2S quantum dots. This process restores surface defects, inhibits the non-radiation recombination pathway, and enhances the intensity of fluorescence emission at 1100 nm, thus making the probe able to be used in the NIR-II fluorescence detection of Zn2+ [32].
Pourfallah et al. reported the first 4-aminoquinoline-based reusable nanochemosensor for Zn2+ [33] with PEG-linked Fe3O4@SiO2-PEG-4AQ and Fe3O4@SiO2-4AQ magnetic cores. Red shift and a 13.5-fold fluorescent enhancement were observed upon complexation with Zn2+, with a detection limit of 0.0065 μmol/L, showing a reversible operation upon treatment with EDTA [33].
A fluorometric assay for Zn2+ was reported by Shen et al., which relies on the use of an isothermal cycle to amplify the fluorescence signal, and of magnetic beads to completely remove unreacted DNA detection probes [34]. The sensor had a detection limit as low as 33 fmol/L, and was successfully applied for the determination of Zn2+ in spiked tap water and seawater samples, as well as in infant milk powder and breast milk [34].
Continuing these recent efforts, we aimed to create the first crown ether-functionalized MNP for the fluorescent determination of Zn2+. Herein, we present a method which allows for a uniquely simple regeneration, using only extraction with slightly acidic water, and also a very high selectivity due to the inclusion-type complexation of the applied fluoroionophore. Furthermore, the introduced measurement protocol enables the component selective analysis of suspensions, which can rarely be performed using other optochemical sensors. Moreover, an analysis of real samples was performed without any preliminary sample preparation (filtration, preconcentration/dilution, pH adjustment, etc.).

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials and Instruments

The chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corporation (St. Louis, MO, USA, owned by Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and were used without further purification unless otherwise noted. A commercially available silica-coated MNP, TurboBeads™ Silica, was used as a magnetic nanocore for further functionalization. It has a carbon content of ≤14 wt%, a cobalt magnetic core, a magnetism of ≥100 emu/g mass saturation, a 20–40 nm average diameter, a specific surface area of ≥15 m2/g, and high stability in the air (weight gain in the air at 100 °C < 3 wt%).
An acridino-diaza-20-crown-6 ether containing reactive allyl groups (1, see Figure 1) was used as a direct-type fluorescent sensor molecule [35]. Covalent attachment to the silica-coated surface of the MNP was performed through the reaction of the allyl units via a 3-C-atom-containing molecular spacer.
This fluoroionophore can fulfill receptor and signaling functions simultaneously. Its selectivity was previously proved in a solution phase [35]. The ionophore preferred Zn2+ (logK = 5.6, ΔlogK > 4.0 in each case) over 20 other potential competing cations (Rb2+, Li+, Cs+, Mn2+, Fe2+, Ba2+, Sr2+, Hg2+, Cd2+, K+, Ni2+, Co2+, Na+, Cu2+, Ag+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cr3+, Pd2+, Pb2+) and showed a reversible complex formation with a 1:1 stoichiometry. Only Al3+ and Bi3+ interfered, but these ions are rarely present as contaminants in practice. The coordination of anions (H2PO4, NO3, HSO4, CH3COO, F, Cl, Br, I) is also not expected, even when the ionophore is protonated [35].
UV/Vis spectra were recorded on a UNICAM UV4-100 spectrophotometer, controlled using the VIZION 3.4 software (ATI UNICAM, UK). Fluorescence emission spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer LS 50B luminescent spectrometer (PerkinElmer Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and were corrected using the FL Winlab 3.0 spectrometer software (PerkinElmer Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Quartz cuvettes with a path length of 1 cm were used in all cases. Zn2+-acetate was used for preparing all artificial samples. Spectroscopic measurements were carried out at room temperature (25 ± 1 °C). During the spectrophotometric titrations, the solutions were added with a Hamilton-syringe to the aqueous solutions in the spectrophotometric cuvette. The results were corrected with the background signal and the dilution effect of the added solutions. OriginPro 8.6 (OriginLab Corp., Northampton, MA, USA) software was used for the evaluation and visualization of the spectroscopic results. Every reported point comes from at least three independent measurements.
For the pH measurements, a Mettler Toledo SevenEasy pH meter (Mettler Toledo, Columbus, OH, USA), fitted with a Mettler Toledo Inlab microelectrode, was used. The various pH values were adjusted with nitric acid and an aqueous sodium hydroxide solution. The accuracy of the pH determinations was within ±0.1 unit.
In the cases of multielement sample compositions, like real samples, the element masses were determined via inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES). Sample solutions of 5 mL were acidified with 50 µL of nitric acid (63 wt%). The sample solutions were measured in simultaneous, multielement mode using a Labtest Plasmalab ICP-spectrometer (Labtest Equipment Company, Valparaiso, IN, USA) with a 40-channel Paschen–Runge vacuum polychromator with photomultiplier detectors. Additional information on the instrumentation and measurement settings can be found in the Supplementary Materials.
In the case of selectivity studies, 23 different metal salts were used: carbonate counterion: Rb2+, Li+, Cs+; sulfate counterion: Mn2+, Fe2+; hydroxide counterion: Ba2+; chloride counterion: Sr2+, Al3+, Hg2+, Bi3+; iodide counterion: Cd2+; acetate counterion: K+, Ni2+, Co2+, Na+, Cu2+, Ag+, Ca2+, Zn2+, Mg2+; nitrate counterion: Cr3+, Pd2+, Pb2+. These were added separately to the aqueous colloid dispersion of the fluorescent MNP in the form of 50 mM aqueous solutions.
Validation was carried out by measuring untreated (containing floating physical contaminants, e.g., sand, etc.) river water from the Danube and aqueous suspensions of pumpkin seed flour. Detailed information regarding the composition of both the river water and the flour can be found in the Supplementary Materials.

2.2. Determination of Limit of Detection and Quantitation and Response Time

The detection limits (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) were calculated by using the data of the fluorescence titrations. To determine the signal-to-noise ratio, the fluorescence intensity of the MNP was measured nine times, and the standard deviation of these blank measurements was determined. Three separate measurements of the emission intensity were performed in the presence of Zn2+, and the average of the intensities was plotted as a function of the Zn2+ concentration to determine the slope of the linear regression (see Supplementary Materials). The LOD and LOQ were calculated based on a standard method [36], as follows:
L O D = 3 d S
L O Q = 10 d S
where d is the standard deviation of the optical signal of the sensor membrane and S is the slope of linear regression for the emission intensities as a function of the concentration of Zn2+.
The response time was defined as the time required to reach 95% of a constant optical response.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Surface Modification of Silica-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles

The modification of the silica-coated surface-layer of the MNP (2) was carried out based on a previously reported two-step procedure for modifying spherical silica gels [20]. Some changes were introduced to modify this reported method for MNPs.
A slurry of the silica-coated MNP (2, 150 mg) in dry toluene (1.5 mL) was heated with magnetic stirring (using an external magnetic stirrer by exploiting only the magnetic properties of the NP) to reflux under argon for 12 h. The formed water was removed by adding a 3 Å molecular sieve (300 mg). After adding (γ-mercaptopropyl)-trimethoxysilane (3, 300 µL, 1.53 mmol), the mixture was stirred in the above conditions for 48 h. The mixture was cooled down to 25 °C the modified MNP (4) was collected by using an external magnet and then washed sequentially with toluene (5.0 mL), CHCl3 (5.0 mL), MeOH (5.0 mL), and CHCl3 (5.0 mL).
As a second step, the modified MNPs containing the reactive linkers (4) were directly transferred to the reaction with crown ether (1) in the form of a slurry in CHCl3 (evaporation to dryness should not be applied to avoid the aggregation of the MNPs). The slurry of the linker-functionalized MNP (4, 1.0 mL), macrocyclic fluoroionophore (1, 30 mg, 0.06 mmol) and 2,2′-azobis(2-methyl)propionitrile (AIBN, 3.0 mg, 0.02 mmol) in freshly distilled pure and dry CHCl3 (2.0 mL), was heated with magnetic stirring at 50 °C under argon for 48 h; two additional portions of AIBN (3.0 mg, 0.02 mmol each) were added after 12 and 24 h. After cooling to 25 °C, the fluorescent MNPs were collected with a permanent external magnet and washed sequentially with CHCl3 (5.0 mL), MeOH (5.0 mL), and H2O (3 × 5.0 mL). The synthetic steps of the functionalization are shown in Scheme 1.
The modification procedure caused a partial aggregation of the MNPs (probably due to mechanical stirring and/or the bifunctional nature of the sensor molecule); thus, larger ones formed in the suspension. These aggregates were separated via sedimentation to gain a stable colloidal dispersion in water. The particles were added in the form of these aqueous colloidal dispersions to the samples for fluorescence studies. All of the measurements were performed within 24 h, while the colloidal dispersion of the functionalized MNPs remained stable.
Neither combustion analysis nor FTIR measurements could be used for determining the loading density of macrocycle 1, since the portion of them on the surface did not prove to be enough for achieving a proper determination. That is why UV/Vis titration was carried out to obtain a calibration curve for the fluoroionophore (1), and the portion of the attached amount of the sensor molecule (1) was calculated according to the Lambert–Beer equation (detailed information can be found in the Supplementary Materials). The results show that the functionalized MNPs contain ~3.3 wt% covalently immobilized sensor molecules on their surfaces. The presence of some non-fluorescent particles cannot be excluded; they, just like inactive ionophores, reduce sensitivity by causing background signals. However, the probability for particles to remain non-fluorescent is very small. A rough estimation for the average number of immobilized crown ethers resulted in a number of about 1014 pieces of molecules per nanoparticles. Five parallel measurements were carried out after proving the effectiveness of removing the remaining unbonded sensor molecules. Centrifugation and a subsequent spectrophotometrical investigation of the filtrate were used for checking the presence of the physically (not covalently) adsorbed fluoroionophores.

3.2. Measurement Procedure

The Zn2+ content of samples in solution, or even in suspension, can be measured by directly adding a water-based colloid dispersion of the functionalized MNPs (Step 1 in Figure 2). The optimal ratio is as follows: 1.0 mg of MNPs in 1.0 mL of distilled water to 4.0 mL of sample (optimized for the linear working range of the probe, see Section 3.3). Then, the samples need to be mechanically stirred to reach a homogeneous distribution of dissolved Zn2+ in the medium (Step 2 in Figure 2). After stirring, some incubation time is required to let the suspension sediment fall to the bottom of the vial. Following sedimentation, the MNPs can be easily separated by using a permanent magnet externally (Step 3 in Figure 2); thus, the sediment and suspension phase of the sample can be removed via pipetting. (In the case of homogeneous samples, analysis can be directly performed without sedimentation.) During this process, a part of the sensor molecules form inclusion complexes with the dissolved Zn2+ on the surface of the physically segregated MNPs. This is followed by diluting the segregated MNP slurry to the volume corresponding to the initial state (Step 4 in Figure 2). Finally, the content of the vial is shaken well to gain a homogeneously distributed colloid again, and the latter, containing the macrocycle 1-Zn2+ complexes, is analyzed using a conventional fluorescent spectrophotometer to determine the Zn2+ content based on the spectral changes (Steps 5–6 in Figure 2).
It is clear from the applied protocol that it only enables the determination of the dissolved Zn2+ inside the heterogeneous samples. If there is a need to study the content of the solid part of the samples, additional treatments of the samples (e.g., using strong acid) have to be initially performed.
After the determination of Zn2+, the applied MNPs can be used several more times. The regeneration, i.e., the removal of the complexed Zn2+ from the macrocycle cavity, can be performed by using a slightly acidic (pH = 4.0 aqueous solution of nitric acid) extraction. The dispersion should be diluted and shaken two times with an equivalent volume of the acidic solution while separating the MNPs. The third extraction should be carried out with an aqueous pH = 9.0 sodium hydroxide solution to convert fluoroionophore 1 back to its neutral form. The mechanism of the facilitated decomplexation can be seen in Figure 3.
It is advantageous that no chelating additives (i.e., EDTA) are needed compared to many other methods. The slightly acidic medium first causes the protonation of the basic tertiary-N-atoms and then also the weakly basic acridine-N of the macrocycle (1), which results in the loss of their electron donor ability, leading to the dissociation of the complexed Zn2+ from the molecular cage.

3.3. Fluorescence Response to Zn2+

Since the prerequisite for detection is a solid-phase extraction process, during which the sensor molecules bind the dissolved Zn2+ from the sample, the extraction ability was investigated prior to the fluorescence response. This study was carried out by using single-component, homogeneous samples in the concentration range of 15–3000 ppb Zn2+. The extracted amount of Zn2+ was determined after applying the general measurement protocol and the subsequent regeneration process (Section 3.2). Studies revealed that almost the total amount of dissolved Zn2+ (>95% in each case) was reversibly complexed by the immobilized sensor molecules during the solid-phase extraction process. The observed high extraction ability was supported by the optimization: sensor molecules were present in excess to the Zn2+ content in the entire concentration range of the quantitation. According to the results, the extraction ability of the MNPs does not hinder optochemical analysis in the linear working range of concentration. In the cases of analyzing highly heterogeneous samples, the extraction ability is expected to decrease.
Initially, titration was carried out by using single-component, aqueous solutions of Zn2+ of a wide concentration range. The obtained series of spectra can be seen in Figure 4.
The emission peak wavelength was 370 nm and an 8.7-fold fluorescence enhancement was observed in the 1.0 × 10−8–2.0 × 10−1 mol/L Zn2+ concentration range while applying excitation at 250 nm. It is important to mention that not all of the immobilized sensor molecules serve as active binding sites for Zn2+ due to the presence of numerous adverse effects on ion-trap conformation.
Figure 5 shows the titration curve reported at the emission peak maximum of 370 nm.
The relative standard deviation was within 3.2%. A linear dynamic range of optical response was obtained below 3000 ppb ( F = 52.3 · l o g c Z n 2 + + 682.8   ; R 2 = 0.97 ). The LOD was calculated as 5 ppb, while the LOQ was determined to be 15 ppb. The linearity is also reliable ( R 2 = 0.99 ) at higher concentration levels, with an altered slope of the calibration curve. However, quantitation was optimized for concentrations below 3000 ppb. For determining higher Zn2+ concentrations, the relative quantity of the MNPs needs to be increased, attributed to the limited binding capacity of the immobilized fluoroionophores.
It is noteworthy to mention that an incubation time is required to reach the equilibrium of complex formation to obtain a constant response. It usually takes more time in the case of immobilized ionophores compared to dissolved ones. Studies were carried out to determine the smallest sufficient time of magnetic stirring before fluorescent determination (Figure 6).
In the case of the studied samples, a 10 min incubation proved to be enough to achieve a constant signal with a lower deviation. However, depending on the heterogeneity of the samples, more time might be needed.

3.4. Study on Reversibility and Reusability

To obtain insight into the regenerability of the proposed sensing nanoparticles, single-component aqueous samples of the same Zn2+ concentration (5.0 × 10−7 mol/L) were measured five times while reporting the observed optical response (Figure 7). Between every repeated measurement, the earlier-mentioned slightly acidic treatment (see Section 3.2) was applied for regeneration.
The results show that only marginal changes of less than 3.0% were observed between the induced changes in fluorescence, which can be attributed to the effective covalent immobilization and highly reversible complexation of the sensor molecules.

3.5. Study on Selectivity

Studies were also carried out on selectivity to prove that immobilization had no effect on the complexation behavior of the fluoroionophore (1). The fluorescence change was investigated in the equimolar presence of the previously mentioned metal salts (see Section 2.1) upon excitation at 250 nm (Figure 8A), and after that, also under competitive conditions in the simultaneous presence of all indifferent ions (Figure 8B).
It can clearly be seen that no significant change (within 5.0%) was caused in the fluorescence by the majority of the metal ions, except Al3+ and Bi3+. This interference was expected from the preliminary studies on the free ionophore [35]. However, these competing ions are rarely co-present with Zn2+ in real samples; thus, this competition does not hinder practical applicability. We found that the equimolar copresence of the 20 metal ions, which proved to be indifferent, also did not influence the response toward Zn2+ significantly. The deviance compared to the single-component Zn2+ sample was only within 6%. This observation also indicates that the sensor molecules strongly coordinate Zn2+, even in the presence of Cd2+, Pb2+, Hg2+, Co2+, Ni2+, and Cu2+, which are considered typical competitors in similar chemosensing applications [8].
The obtained selectivity was compared with that of the dissolved ionophore [35] to reveal the effects of nanocores and immobilization on both molecular recognition and signaling. Based on the comparison, both the complexing and signaling properties of the sensor molecule could quite effectively be preserved despite the covalent immobilization. The presence of Zn2+ still caused the largest fluorescence enhancement without significant shifts in the emission peak wavelength, while the addition of Al3+ and Bi3+ additionally caused a slight bathochromic shift. None of the other studied ions showed significant interference with the preferred ones. All of these observations are the same for the dissolved and immobilized sensor molecules. The enhancement of the fluorescence upon the complexation of the preferred ions was smaller compared to the case of the dissolved ionophores. It can be attributed to the fact that not all of the immobilized ionophores can be considered active for complexation, and the optical effects of the non-fluorogenic nanocores can also reduce the sensitivity of detection.
An exact explanation of selectivity cannot be given based on the similarities of the ionic radii or the electronic configuration of the complexed cations. There are several reported optochemical ionophores containing the same 4,5-dimethyleneacridine fluorophore unit, such as our proposed sensor molecule. These structurally analogue sensor molecules typically show selectivity for soft electrophilic cations like Hg2+ [37], Cd2+ [37,38,39,40], Zn2+ [39], Ni2+ [41], and Fe3+ [41,42]. This is attributed to their soft nucleophilic acridine-N and two—usually tertiary—aliphatic N-atoms, which have lone electron pairs for coordination. Thus, the observed selectivity is not surprising. After making an overview on recently published Al3+- and Bi3+-selective sensor molecules, it can be seen that almost every coordination sphere consists of a tertiary aliphatic N with a lone electron pair and additionally coordinating O-centers within a 2–4-atom distance [43,44,45,46,47,48]. Among the studied competing ions, the trivalent cations, i.e., Cr3+, interfere in general [47,48]. It is also important to mention that only one example could be found when selectivity toward Bi3+ and Al3+ were investigated together, and this study also reported the competition of these two cations [43].

3.6. Study on pH Dependence

The pH values of the samples were varied by adding corresponding amounts of aqueous solutions of nitric acid or sodium hydroxide to the aqueous colloid samples of the MNPs containing 5.0 × 10−7 mol/L of Zn2+. The results can be seen in Figure 9.
In the pH interval of 5.5 to 7.5, a constant signal was obtained, indicating a pH-independent working range, which covers the most relevant pH range of the environmental and biological samples. Below pH = 5.5, the basic nitrogens of the sensor molecule can accept protons, which causes a reduced stability of the Zn2+ complex, which can be exploited effectively for regeneration (see Figure 3). The protonation of the ionophore (1) can also take place in the absence of Zn2+. The pH range above 7.5 is not considered relevant due to the expected precipitation of the dissolved Zn2+.

3.7. Validation by Analyzing Real Samples

Untreated river water and an aqueous suspension of pumpkin seed flour were measured as heterogenous multicomponent samples with a natural Zn2+ content. Detailed information regarding these samples can be found in the Supplementary Materials. The results were compared with those measured via ICP-OES (Table 1).
Real   c Z n 2 + F t h e o r e t i c a l F ¯ o b s e r v e d Determined   c Z n 2 + Meeting our expectations, both the accuracy and precision are inferior to those of the ICP-OES method. The results show that lower concentrations were determined using the proposed probe than the real concentration of Zn2+ in all cases. This can be attributed to the fact that not all the Zn2+ contents can be complexed with the fluoroionophore, and partial decomplexation can also take place during the magnetic-assisted solid-phase extraction of the MNPs. Moreover, in the cases of highly contaminated heterogeneous samples, the extraction ability of the particles is expected to decrease due to the nonspecific adsorption of the physical contaminants and the hindered complexation of the sensor molecules. The measurements also revealed that only about 10% of the total Zn2+ content of the pumpkin seed flour is dissolved in the sample (the remaining amount is inside the solid part of the sample). Naturally, the proposed probe is only suitable for giving a rough estimation for the dissolved form of Zn2+ without any prior treatment of the sample.

4. Evaluation of the Results through Comparisons with Other Methods

The most recent and relevant reported works on the NP-based selective fluorescent optosensing of Zn2+ were collected to put the obtained results into context and support the evaluation of the properties of the proposed probe (Table 2).
A comparison with data from the literature supports the competitiveness of the developed method. Although the obtained LOD is three orders of magnitude lower than the WHO acceptance limit for drinking water, it cannot be considered outstanding among the other alternatives. It can be concluded that each reported method has its own advantages; thus, users are responsible for choosing the most suitable one for the target tasks, for example, based on the linear dynamic ranges. It is also important to note that those methods, which reported the functionalization of typically single-use, non-magnetic nanocores (indicated with ‘✗’ in Table 2) are not able to analyze strongly contaminated samples, especially heterogeneous ones, such as suspensions. Furthermore, they themselves can cause sample contamination, while in the absence of magnetic solid-phase extraction, the presence of the various background materials can strongly influence the optical response. In general, the introduction of supramolecular host molecules, instead of exploiting simpler functional group-driven coordination, contributes to reducing non-specific adsorption. This was shown in the present case as well, since the applied probe showed less influence (i.e., a weaker fluorescence response) from possible competing agents like Cd2+ or other metal ions compared to the majority of the reported alternatives [8,31,32,33,34,50,51]. Also, many other methods use chelating additives, like EDTA, for regeneration [8,33]. Comparisons with less advanced Zn2+-selective fluorescent probes (e.g., the application of dissolved ionophores, single-use materials and tests, optode membranes regardless of the type of ionophore immobilization, etc.) are not discussed here. They need a more extended preliminary preparation of samples, despite the fact that their applicability covers a narrower range of analytical challenges.

5. Conclusions

The basic concept of our work involves overcoming the limitations of Zn2+-selective ionophore-based fluorescent analyses in suspensions, which is considered one of the most unfavorable conditions for optical chemosensing. We present here a simple alternative for the covalent modification of a commercially available MNP core, which can also serve as a starting point for future development by applying other ionophores. Qualitative analyses were successfully performed, but the probe was only suitable for giving a rough quantitative estimation for Zn2+ content. Applicability was clearly demonstrated, even in real heterogeneous multicomponent samples, while comparison studies revealed a competitive performance to previous results in the literature. The main advantages of the present method are the lack of interference from Cd2+ and any relevant anions, the fast and simple regeneration, no sample preparation in general, and the direct applicability for heterogeneous samples. In addition, there is no obstacle to expanding the application in the future of the proposed probe for the rarely investigated Bi3+ or for bioimaging in living cells.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/chemosensors11100547/s1: Table S1: Metal ion composition of the investigated river water samples determined by ICP-OES; Table S2: Composition of the investigated pumpkin seed flour calculated for 100 g; Figure S1: Concentration-dependent absorption of fluoroionophore 1 in chloroform; Figure S2: UV-absorbance-based calibration curve of fluoroionophore 1 at 250 nm used for calculating its concentration (R2 = 0.99); Figure S3: Linear regression for the optochemical responses in the presence of low concentrations of Zn2+.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Á.G.; methodology, Á.G.; formal analysis, P.V.; investigation, P.V. and Á.G.; resources, P.H.; writing—original draft preparation, P.V. and Á.G.; writing—review and editing, T.T. and P.H.; visualization, P.V.; project administration, Á.G.; funding acquisition, P.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Research, Development, and Innovation Office (grant number K128473), supported by the ÚNKP-23-4-II-BME-127 New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Culture and Innovation from the source of the National Research, Development, and Innovation Fund.Chemosensors 11 00547 i001

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their thanks to Dániel Ster for his valuable technical assistance during this work. Special thanks to the Photonics Department of the Centre for Energy Research for their help and assistance, especially to Dániel Zámbó for his helpful suggestions on this work. Thanks to László Bezúr for the multielement sample analyses. Thanks to Dennis Mitchell for revising the English language and style.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funding institution had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Sarkar, K.; Dhara, K.; Nandi, M.; Roy, P.; Bhaumik, A.; Banerjee, P. Selective zinc(II)-ion fluorescence sensing by a functionalized mesoporous material covalently grafted with a fluorescent chromophore and consequent biological applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dong, Z.; Dong, Z.; Wang, P.; Tian, X.; Geng, H.; Li, R.; Ma, J. A fluorescent probe for zinc detection based on organically functionalized SBA-15. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 257, 802–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Golcs, Á.; Kovács, K.; Vezse, P.; Bezúr, L.; Huszthy, P.; Tóth, T. A cuvette-compatible Zn2+ sensing tool for conventional spectrofluorometers prepared by copolymerization of macrocyclic fluoroionophores on quartz glass surface. Methods Appl. Fluoresc. 2022, 10, 035005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pratiwi, F.W.; Kuo, C.W.; Chen, B.C.; Chen, P. Recent advances in the use of fluorescent nanoparticles for bioimaging. Nanomedicine 2019, 14, 1759–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chasapis, C.T.; Ntoupa, P.S.A.; Spiliopoulou, C.A.; Stefanidou, M.E. Recent aspects of the effects of zinc on human health. Arch. Toxicol. 2020, 94, 1443–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Paderni, D.; Giorgi, L.; Voccia, M.; Formica, M.; Caporaso, L.; Macedi, E.; Fusi, V. A new benzoxazole-based fluorescent macrocyclic chemosensor for optical detection of Zn2+ and Cd2+. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Suh, B.; Gil, D.; Yoon, S.; Kim, K.T.; Kim, C. A practical hydrazine-carbothioamide-based fluorescent probe for the detection of Zn2+: Applications to paper strip, zebrafish and water samples. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kim, K.T.; Yoon, S.A.; Ahn, J.; Choi, Y.; Lee, M.H.; Jung, J.H.; Park, J. Synthesis of fluorescent naphthalimide-functionalized Fe3O4 nanoparticles and their application for the selective detection of Zn2+ present in contaminated soil. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 243, 1034–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. World Health Organization. Zinc in Drinking-Water. Background Document for Preparation of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003; Document No.: WHO/SDE/WSH/03.04/17. Available online: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/wash-documents/wash-chemicals/zinc.pdf?sfvrsn=9529d066_4 (accessed on 18 September 2022).
  10. Shiller, A.M.; Boyle, E. Dissolved zinc in rivers. Nature 1985, 317, 49–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, S.; Han, G.; Gao, X. The urbanization impacts on potentially toxic metals: The distribution, sources and contamination risks in river situated in typical megacity, China. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2023, 97, 104784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sun, X.; Rosa-Gastaldo, D.; De Biasi, F.; Rastrelli, F.; Mancin, F. 1H NMR chemosensing of potassium ions enabled by guest-induced selectivity switch of a gold nanoparticle/crown ether nanoreceptor. ChemPlusChem 2019, 84, 1498–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Deymehkar, E.; Taher, M.A.; Karami, C.; Arman, A. Synthesis of SPR nanosensor using gold nanoparticles and its application to copper(II) determination. Silicon 2018, 10, 1329–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kakhki, R.M.; Rakhshanipour, M. Application of nanoparticle modified with crown ether in colorimetric determinations. Arab. J. Chem. 2019, 12, 3096–3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, C.; Sun, F.; He, G.; Zhao, H.; Tian, L.; Cheng, Y.; Li, G. Noble metal nanoparticles meet molecular cages: A tale of integration and synergy. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 63, 101660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Salvia, M.V.; Salassa, G.; Rastrelli, F.; Mancin, F. Turning supramolecular receptors into chemosensors by nanoparticle-assisted “NMR chemosensing”. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 11399–11406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Müller, B.J.; Zhdanov, A.V.; Borisov, S.M.; Foley, T.; Okkelman, I.A.; Tsytsarev, V.; Tang, Q.; Erzurumlu, R.S.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, H.; et al. Nanoparticle-based fluoroionophore for analysis of potassium ion dynamics in 3D tissue models and in vivo. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1704598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Bakker, E.; Bühlmann, P.; Pretsch, E. Carrier-based ion-selective electrodes and bulk optodes. 1. General characteristics. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 3083–3132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Geißler, D.; Nirmalananthan-Budau, N.; Scholtz, L.; Tavernaro, I.; Resch-Genger, U. Analyzing the surface of functional nanomaterials—How to quantify the total and derivatizable number of functional groups and ligands. Mikrochim. Acta 2021, 188, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lakatos, S.; Fetter, J.; Bertha, F.; Huszthy, P.; Tóth, T.; Farkas, V.; Orosz, G.; Hollósi, M. Preparation of a new chiral acridino-18-crown-6 ether-based stationary phase for enantioseparation of racemic protonated primary aralkyl amines. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 1012–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kobayashi, Y.; Gu, S.; Nagao, D.; Konno, M. Direct coating of particles by a liquid phase process. Curr. Nanosci. 2007, 3, 222–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kumar, S.; Ten Siethoff, L.; Persson, M.; Albet-Torres, N.; Månsson, A. Magnetic capture from blood rescues molecular motor function in diagnostic nanodevices. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2013, 11, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zlateski, V.; Fuhrer, R.; Koehler, F.M.; Wharry, S.; Zeltner, M.; Stark, W.J.; Moody, T.S.; Grass, R.N. Efficient magnetic recycling of covalently attached enzymes on carbon-coated metallic nanomagnets. Bioconjug. Chem. 2014, 25, 677–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Herrmann, I.K.; Schlegel, A.; Graf, R.; Schumacher, C.M.; Senn, N.; Hasler, M.; Gschwind, S.; Hirt, A.-M.; Günther, D.; Clavien, P.-A.; et al. Nanomagnet-based removal of lead and digoxin from living rats. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 8718–8723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sá, J.; Szlachetko, J.; Sikora, M.; Kavčič, M.; Safonova, O.V.; Nachtegaal, M. Magnetic manipulation of molecules on a non-magnetic catalytic surface. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 8462–8465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kainz, Q.M.; Zeltner, M.; Rossier, M.; Stark, W.J.; Reiser, O. Synthesis of trisubstituted ureas by a multistep sequence utilizing recyclable magnetic reagents and scavengers. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 10038–10045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kawasaki, H.; Nakai, K.; Arakawa, R.; Athanassiou, E.K.; Grass, R.N.; Stark, W.J. Functionalized graphene-coated cobalt nanoparticles for highly efficient surface-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry analysis. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 9268–9275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wang, F.; Wang, K.; Kong, Q.; Wang, J.; Xi, D.; Gu, B.; Lu, S.; Wei, T.; Chen, X. Recent studies focusing on the development of fluorescence probes for zinc ion. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 429, 213636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sadananda, D.; Mallikarjunaswamy, A.M.M.; Prashantha, C.N.; Mala, R.; Gouthami, K.; Lakshminarayana, L.; Ferreira, L.F.R.; Bilal, M.; Rahdar, A.; Mulla, S.I. Recent development in chemosensor probes for the detection and imaging of zinc ions: A systematic review. Chem. Pap. 2022, 76, 5997–6015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, D.; Ma, Y.; Duan, H.; Jiang, F.; Deng, W.; Ren, X. Fluorescent/SERS dual-sensing and imaging of intracellular Zn2+. Anal. Chim. Acta 2018, 1038, 148–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jia, M.Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Niu, L.Y.; Feng, L. BODIPY-based self-assembled nanoparticles as fluorescence turn-on sensor for the selective detection of zinc in human hair. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 85, 515–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wu, Q.; Zhou, M.; Shi, J.; Li, Q.; Yang, M.; Zhang, Z. Synthesis of water-soluble Ag2S quantum dots with fluorescence in the second near-infrared window for turn-on detection of Zn(II) and Cd(II). Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 6616–6623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pourfallah, G.; Lou, X. Novel 4-amino-2-methyl-8-(trifluoromethyl)quinoline-based magnetic nanostructures for highly sensitive detection of zinc ions in aqueous solutions. Dyes Pigm. 2018, 158, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shen, W.; Li, Y.; Qi, T.; Wang, S.; Sun, J.; Deng, H.; Lu, H.; Chen, C.; Chen, L.; Tang, S. Fluorometric determination of zinc(II) by using DNAzyme-modified magnetic microbeads. Microchim. Acta 2018, 185, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Golcs, Á.; Kovács, K.; Vezse, P.; Tóth, T.; Huszthy, P. Acridino-diaza-20-crown-6 ethers: New macrocyclic hosts for optochemical metal ion sensing. Molecules 2021, 26, 4043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Long, G.L.; Winefordner, J.D. Limit of detection. A closer look at the IUPAC definition. Anal. Chem. 1983, 55, 712A–724A. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lee, H.N.; Kim, H.N.; Swamy, K.M.K.; Park, M.S.; Kim, J.; Lee, H.; Park, S.; Yoon, J. New acridine derivatives bearing immobilized azacrown or azathiacrown ligand as fluorescent chemosensors for Hg2+ and Cd2+. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 1261–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. dos Santos Carlos, F.; da Silva, L.A.; Zanlorenzi, C.; Nunes, F.S. A novel macrocycle acridine-based fluorescent chemosensor for selective detection of Cd2+ in Brazilian sugarcane spirit and tobacco cigarette smoke extract. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2020, 508, 119634–119641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Visscher, A.; Bachmann, S.; Schnegelsberg, C.; Teuteberg, T.; Mata, R.A.; Stalke, D. Highly selective and sensitive fluorescence detection of Zn2+ and Cd2+ ions by using an acridine sensor. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 5689–5699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wang, Y.; Hu, X.; Wang, L.; Shang, Z.; Chao, J.; Jin, W. A new acridine derivative as a highly selective ‘off–on’ fluorescence chemosensor for Cd2+ in aqueous media. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 156, 126–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, C.; Fu, J.; Yao, K.; Xue, K.; Xu, K.; Pang, X. Acridine-based fluorescence chemosensors for selective sensing of Fe3+ and Ni2+ ions. Spectrochim. Acta A 2018, 199, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhou, J.; Yuan, Y.F.; Zhuo, J.B.; Lin, C.X. Synthesis and characterization of cyclophane: The highly selective recognition of Fe3+ in aqueous solution and H2PO4 in acetonitrile solution. Tetrahedron Lett. 2018, 59, 1059–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Saravanan, A.; Shyamsivappan, S.; Suresh, T.; Subashini, G.; Kadirvelu, K.; Bhuvanesh, N.; Nandhakumar, R.; Mohan, P.S. An efficient new dual fluorescent pyrene based chemosensor for the detection of bismuth(III) and aluminium(III) ions and its applications in bio-imaging. Talanta 2019, 198, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. El-Sewify, I.M.; Shenashen, M.A.; Shahat, A.; Yamaguchi, H.; Selim, M.M.; Khalil, M.M.; El-Safty, S.A. Dual colorimetric and fluorometric monitoring of Bi3+ ions in water using supermicroporous Zr-MOFs chemosensors. J. Lumin. 2018, 198, 438–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ramasamy, K.; Thambusamy, S. Dual emission and pH based naphthalimide derivative fluorescent sensor for the detection of Bi3+. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 247, 632–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, E.; Ju, P.; Li, Q.; Hou, X.; Yang, H.; Yang, X.; Zou, Y.; Zhang, Y. A novel rhodamine 6G-based fluorescent and colorimetric probe for Bi3+: Synthesis, selectivity, sensitivity and potential applications. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 260, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yue, X.L.; Wang, Z.Q.; Li, C.R.; Yang, Z.Y. Naphthalene-derived Al3+-selective fluorescent chemosensor based on PET and ESIPT in aqueous solution. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017, 58, 4532–4537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yu, C.; Jian, L.; Ji, Y.; Zhang, J. Al(III)-responsive “off-on” chemosensor based on rhodamine derivative and its application in cell imaging. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 31106–31112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Qiu, L.; Zhou, S.; Li, Y.; Rui, W.; Cui, P.; Zhang, C.; Yu, Y.; Wang, C.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; et al. Silica-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles as a bifunctional agent for magnetic resonance imaging and ZnII fluorescent sensing. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2021, 20, 3667–3673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yang, M.; Kong, W.; Li, H.; Liu, J.; Huang, H.; Liu, Y.; Kang, Z. Fluorescent carbon dots for sensitive determination and intracellular imaging of zinc(II) ion. Microchim. Acta 2015, 182, 2443–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xu, S.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Luo, Y.; Yu, B.; Zhang, W. A magnetic functionalized lanthanide fluorescent sensor for detection of trace zinc ion. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2021, 47, 3487–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The applied Zn2+-selective fluorescent sensor molecule (1).
Figure 1. The applied Zn2+-selective fluorescent sensor molecule (1).
Chemosensors 11 00547 g001
Scheme 1. Procedure for the functionalization of silica-coated MNPs (2).
Scheme 1. Procedure for the functionalization of silica-coated MNPs (2).
Chemosensors 11 00547 sch001
Figure 2. The applied measurement protocol for sample analysis.
Figure 2. The applied measurement protocol for sample analysis.
Chemosensors 11 00547 g002
Figure 3. Acid-induced decomplexation of the immobilized sensor molecule (1) on the surface of the MNP during the regeneration cycle.
Figure 3. Acid-induced decomplexation of the immobilized sensor molecule (1) on the surface of the MNP during the regeneration cycle.
Chemosensors 11 00547 g003
Figure 4. Series of spectra for fluorescence titration of the functionalized MNPs, using single-component aqueous solutions of Zn2+ (λexcitation = 250 nm).
Figure 4. Series of spectra for fluorescence titration of the functionalized MNPs, using single-component aqueous solutions of Zn2+ (λexcitation = 250 nm).
Chemosensors 11 00547 g004
Figure 5. Changes in the fluorescence intensities of the titration spectra at 370 nm as a function of the logarithm of the Zn2+ concentration.
Figure 5. Changes in the fluorescence intensities of the titration spectra at 370 nm as a function of the logarithm of the Zn2+ concentration.
Chemosensors 11 00547 g005
Figure 6. Time dependence of fluorescence response in the presence and absence of Zn2+ (λexcitation = 250 nm, λdetection = 370 nm).
Figure 6. Time dependence of fluorescence response in the presence and absence of Zn2+ (λexcitation = 250 nm, λdetection = 370 nm).
Chemosensors 11 00547 g006
Figure 7. Studies on reusability through the repeated determination of 5.0 × 10−7 mol/L Zn2+ samples (Fmeasured refers to the measured fluorescence intensity at 370 nm, while Fexpected corresponds to the calibration curve at the same wavelength).
Figure 7. Studies on reusability through the repeated determination of 5.0 × 10−7 mol/L Zn2+ samples (Fmeasured refers to the measured fluorescence intensity at 370 nm, while Fexpected corresponds to the calibration curve at the same wavelength).
Chemosensors 11 00547 g007
Figure 8. Studies on selectivity through separate measurements of 5.0 × 10−5 mol/L aqueous samples of potentially competing metal ions (A) and those under competitive conditions in the presence of 1.0 × 10−3 mol/L background electrolytes as a mixture of the 20 indifferent ions with 5.0 × 10−5 mol/L individual concentrations, while adding 5.0 × 10−5 mol/L of Zn2+ (B) (λexcitation = 250 nm).
Figure 8. Studies on selectivity through separate measurements of 5.0 × 10−5 mol/L aqueous samples of potentially competing metal ions (A) and those under competitive conditions in the presence of 1.0 × 10−3 mol/L background electrolytes as a mixture of the 20 indifferent ions with 5.0 × 10−5 mol/L individual concentrations, while adding 5.0 × 10−5 mol/L of Zn2+ (B) (λexcitation = 250 nm).
Chemosensors 11 00547 g008
Figure 9. The pH dependence of the fluorescent response toward 5.0 × 10−7 mol/L of Zn2+ at 370 nm (λexcitation = 250 nm).
Figure 9. The pH dependence of the fluorescent response toward 5.0 × 10−7 mol/L of Zn2+ at 370 nm (λexcitation = 250 nm).
Chemosensors 11 00547 g009
Table 1. Application of the fluorescence probe for determining the Zn2+ content of untreated river water and an aqueous suspension of pumpkin seed flour.
Table 1. Application of the fluorescence probe for determining the Zn2+ content of untreated river water and an aqueous suspension of pumpkin seed flour.
River WaterAqueous Suspension of
Pumpkin Seed Flour
Real   c Z n 2 +  150 ppb105 ppb
F t h e o r e t i c a l  2358375
F ¯ o b s e r v e d 344352
Determined   c Z n 2 +  327 ± 8 ppb39 ± 11 ppb
1 The real concentration of Zn2+ measured via ICP-OES. 2 The theoretically expected fluorescence intensity for Zn2+ based on its concentration measured via ICP-OES. 3 The concentration of Zn2+ calculated according to the reported equation of the linear regression on the calibration curve (Section 3.3).
Table 2. Main operating characteristics of the recently reported, most relevant NP-based fluorescent probes for Zn2+.
Table 2. Main operating characteristics of the recently reported, most relevant NP-based fluorescent probes for Zn2+.
NP TypeMagnetic Property
(✓ or ✗) 1
LOD
(ppb)
Linear Range of Optical Response
(ppb)
Reference
Fe3O4 nanomagnet functionalized with dopamine-naphthalimide-dipicolylamine3.5 × 10−20–1308[8]
N-(2-(bis(pyridine-2-ylmethyl)amino)ethyl)-2-mercaptoacetamide modified gold NP1.8 × 10−565–7848[30]
BODIPY-based self-assembled NPs465–654[31]
Water-soluble Ag2S quantum dots5050–2616[32]
4-Amino-2-methyl-8-(trifluoromethyl)quinoline functionalized silica-coated Fe3O4 nanomagnet0.4not reported[33]
DNAzyme-modified magnetic microbeads2.2 × 10−66.5 × 10−6–0.72[34]
8-Amimoquinoline(N-(quinolin-8-yl)-2-(3-(triethoxysilyl) propylamino)acetamide) functionalized silica-coated Fe3O4 nanomagnetnot reportednot reported[49]
Carbon dots from glucose combined with non-bounded fluorogenic quercetin131131–6540[50]
Magnetic functionalized terbium coordination polymer-adsorbent1414–10,464[51]
Commercially available silica-coated TurboBeadsTM functionalized with fluorogenic crown ether515–3000present work
1 Refers to the nature of the core of the NP, whether it is magnetic (✓) or not (✗).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vezse, P.; Golcs, Á.; Tóth, T.; Huszthy, P. Contamination- and Perturbation-Free Fluorescent Monitoring of Zn2+ in Suspensions Using Crown Ether-Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticles. Chemosensors 2023, 11, 547. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11100547

AMA Style

Vezse P, Golcs Á, Tóth T, Huszthy P. Contamination- and Perturbation-Free Fluorescent Monitoring of Zn2+ in Suspensions Using Crown Ether-Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticles. Chemosensors. 2023; 11(10):547. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11100547

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vezse, Panna, Ádám Golcs, Tünde Tóth, and Péter Huszthy. 2023. "Contamination- and Perturbation-Free Fluorescent Monitoring of Zn2+ in Suspensions Using Crown Ether-Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticles" Chemosensors 11, no. 10: 547. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11100547

APA Style

Vezse, P., Golcs, Á., Tóth, T., & Huszthy, P. (2023). Contamination- and Perturbation-Free Fluorescent Monitoring of Zn2+ in Suspensions Using Crown Ether-Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticles. Chemosensors, 11(10), 547. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11100547

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop