Next Article in Journal
Impact of Neonatal Body (Dis)Proportionality Determined by the Cephalization Index (CI) on Gross Motor Development in Children with Down Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study
Previous Article in Journal
Dual Biologic Therapy in Moderate to Severe Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Children
Volume 10
Issue 1
10.3390/children10010012
children-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effects of Financial Stress and Household Socio-Economic Deprivation on the Malnutrition Statuses of Children under Five during the COVID-19 Lockdown in a Marginalized Region of South Punjab, Pakistan

by
Muhammad Babar Alam
1,2,†,
Muhammad Shahid
2,3,4,†,
Bashar Isam Alzghoul
5,
Juan Yang
6,*,
Rubeena Zakar
1,
Najma Iqbal Malik
7,
Asma Bibi
8 and
Kun Tang
4,*
1
Department of Public Health, Institute of Social and Cultural Studies, University of Punjab, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
2
World Health Organization, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan
3
School of Insurance and Economics, University of International Business and Economics (UIBE), Beijing 100029, China
4
Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
5
Respiratory Care Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences in Jubail, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University-Dammam, Jubail 35816, Saudi Arabia
6
Chinese Academy of Sciences and Technology for Development, Beijing 100038, China
7
Department of Psychology, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan
8
Independent Researcher, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work and share the first authorship.
Children 2023, 10(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10010012
Submission received: 7 November 2022 / Revised: 28 November 2022 / Accepted: 13 December 2022 / Published: 21 December 2022
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The lockdown after the COVID-19 pandemic not only caused public health crises and income stress but also put millions at risk of food insecurity and malnutrition across the globe, especially in low and middle-income countries [LMICs]. This study evaluated the effects of financial stress and household socio-economic deprivation on the nutritional status of 1551 children under the age of five during COVID-19 in Pakistan. A self-administered questionnaire was used between November 2020 and April 2021 to collect information on age, height, children’s weight, and socio-economic status from 1152 rural households from underdeveloped regions in Punjab, Pakistan. With the help of the proportionate simple random sampling method, this study employed a model (binary logistic regression) to calculate the likelihood of malnourishment. The findings showed that the stunting, underweight, and wasting prevalence rates during COVID-19 were 58.86%, 41.89%, and 8.11%, respectively, in the Bahawalpur region. According to the binary logistic regression analysis, among the household deprivation status (HDS) categories, the risks of childhood malnutrition were lesser in HDS-2 (OR = 0.05, 95% CI: 0. 005–0.879) and HDS-3 (OR = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.008–0.193). Similar to this, within the financial stress index (FSI) categories, the children in homes with medium financial stress had reduced odds of malnutrition (OR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.018–0.567), and the children in households with low financial stress had reduced risks of malnutrition (OR = 0.006, 95% CI: 0.005–0.061). The proposed research found that stunting and underweight increased by 17.26% and 12.29% during the COVID-19 lockdown in the Bahawalpur region. Additionally, financial stress and socio-economic deprivation strongly affected children’s nutritional statuses during the COVID-19 lockdown in the Bahawalpur region of Southern Punjab.

1. Introduction

Pakistan has experienced unprecedented levels of financial stress and unemployment due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The poor families in deprived regions of Pakistan were severely affected by COVID-19 [1]. In poor families, the growth and nutrition of children under five were impacted by their pregnant or childbearing women due to severe financial stress during the lockdown. Financial stress significantly affects not only birth outcomes but also has a long-term impact on children’s nutrition status and overall family well-being. The COVID-19 lockdown affected people’s social and economic lives, restricted movement, and slowed global economic and financial activities, which had an immediate socio-economic effect on families [2,3]. Correspondingly, the health crisis evolved into a severe economic and social catastrophe with an impact on family income, unemployment, and well-being levels [4,5,6].
A lot of states were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly those in southern Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, where child undernourishment is a persistent problem [7]. Global experts believe that problems related to food and the economy during the time of the lockdown raised the probability of all forms of malnutrition [8]. During COVID-19, economic decline, food instability, and the suspension of regular nutrition programs may have increased the prevalence of wasting by 10–50% while also raising child mortality [9,10]. Undernutrition was high in the areas where COVID-19 was fatal [11]. It was estimated that in Canada, COVID-19 caused one in four children to experience food insecurity [12]. In the US, 93.5% of respondents reported having food insecurity in April 2020, and 41.4% of respondents claimed that COVID-19 caused them to consume fewer fruits and vegetables [13]. By 2022, the disruptions brought on by COVID-19 may have resulted in 9.3 million more wasted children, 2.6 million more stunted children, 168,000 child fatalities, and 2.1 million cases of maternal anemia and low-weight babies [14]. Additionally, USD 29.7 billion in productivity losses are expected due to increased stunting and child mortality. By stepping up dietary initiatives, an additional USD 1.2B per year would be required to minimize these consequences [14].
Evidence showed that the pandemic caused millions of families in LMICs to fall into poverty, which immediately worsened malnutrition. The number of children living in financially deprived homes has increased from 585 million before the outbreak to 702 million today [15]. Surveys from various countries have already revealed a sharp rise in the number of households with children experiencing food shortages that could be directly attributed to the pandemic [16,17]. Since the pandemic, multidimensional poverty has increased by 150 million more children [15]. In LMICs, COVID-19 not only causes infection but also compromises healthcare, food systems, humanitarian operations, and nutritional and educational initiatives [18,19]. According to UNICEF reports, mother and child nutritional services experienced a substantial reduction (75–100%) during lockdown periods and a 30% overall decline when the pandemic was not in lockdown [18,19]. Approximately 600 million children and families did not receive any government financial assistance as a result of COVID-19, according to a “Save the Children” report [15]. Obesity rates may increase as a result of a deteriorating diet and the social and physical constraints put in place by the government to stop the virus’s spread. The USA has expressed alarm about a potential rise in obesity rates [20]. Nearly 70% of disruptions in routine immunization [21] and 30% of the decrease in essential nutritional services (vitamin supplementation and nutrition promotion programs) were reported in LMICs [22]. Furthermore, efforts to treat children with severe wasting in 2020 were hampered [22]. In Pakistan, a 10% (PKR 1.1 trillion) economic loss in the 2021 financial year was estimated, along with a 33.7% increase in poverty [23]. According to the Pakistan Bauru of Statistics, the GDP growth rate was 6.03%, the unemployment rate was 4.35%, and inflation was 9.5% for the year 2021 (according to world bank data).
Financial stress is a psychological reaction to the feeling of instability, ambiguity, and danger in the management of financial assets and the decision-making process [24]. Financial stress impacted pregnant women more during COVID-19 in terms of the cost associated with prenatal and newborn care. In previous studies, financial stress was associated with mental health and depressive symptoms among women, as financial stress significantly affects the long-term offspring’s health and birth outcomes [25,26]. To date, it is not yet clear in Pakistan whether COVID-19 played any role in increasing malnutrition or not. Some studies conducted in other countries during COVID-19 concluded that COVID-19 hampered important public maternal-child health programs during lockdowns. So, it is hypothesized that the COVID-19 lockdown increased financial stress in families, and further financial stress and socio-economic deprivation have increased the malnutrition statuses in children under five. Therefore, considering this vast research gap, this study investigates the effect of financial stress and household deprivation status on the malnutrition statuses of children under five during COVID-19 in one of the most deprived regions of Punjab in Pakistan.

2. Theoretical and Conceptual Framework

The majority of studies on child malnutrition followed the framework of Becker (1965) and Strauss and Thomas (1995) [27,28]. The experts chose to pursue the household production function in doing so, assuming that every child resides in a structure known as a home and that the utility of each household maximizes as follows:
U = (L, X, Ni)
In the given equation, home utility consists of the consumption of various items [X], leisure [L], and ensuring the nutritional quality [Ni] of children. Ni stands for anthropometric measurements such as stunting (HAZ), underweight (WAZ), and wasting (WHZ). Furthermore, the nutritional statuses of children [Ni] depend on many socio-economic factors such as:
Ni = n [H, Z, W, C, ε]
Here, Ni is a child’s typical anthropometric measurement, C stands for consumption, the W-vector stands for certain children, and the H-vector stands for the specific social and economic characteristics of a home. The health factor vector is represented by Z, while the children-specific error term is represented by the equation. Equation 2 captures the overall effect of child health in terms of the determinants of child health.
The reduced defined production function for the proposed malnutrition study is:
CIAFi = f(household socio-economic factor, factor specific to child-mother, individual and disease factors, εCIAF)
The conceptual framework by Victora et al. (1997) was followed in this investigation. This concept divides variables into three categories: proximal or individual considerations, socio-economic reasons, and intermediate factors containing maternal and environmental concerns. Briefly, these factors may have an impact on the nutritional health of preschool children [29]. The study’s visual representation is presented in Figure 1.

3. Methods

3.1. Participants in the Study and the Eligibility Criteria

The anthropometric data (the height in relation to age measurement, the weight in relation to height measurement, and the weight in relation to age measurement) of 1551 children under five were examined in this study. Based on biologically implausible Z-score levels (less than -5 standard deviation and greater than +5 standard deviation), the World Health Organization defined the anthropometric outliers.

3.2. Research Area, Sample Design, and Data Collection

The primary data for this study were acquired through a simple proportionate purposive simple random sampling method from the rural parts of the Bahawalpur division through a self-administered questionnaire. The sample was distributed proportionally among 3 districts, 14 sub-districts (tehsils), and 42 union councils. In the Bahawalpur division, there were three districts (Rahymyar Khan, Bahawalpur, and Bahawalnagar), and in these districts, there were 14 tehsils. We selected all rural households in three districts as the sample frame, and among these three districts, the rural households in all 14 sub-districts or tehsils were used as the sample frame in our study. The names of the districts and tehsils are provided in Table 1. Furthermore, a total of 129 UCs were included in all four tehsils of the Rahimyar Khan district. There was a total of 88 UCs in all five tehsils of the Bahawalpur district, and a total of 135 UCs were in all five tehsils of the Bahawalnagar district. According to the 2017 census, approximately 75.36% of the population in the Bahawalpur division lived in rural areas, and the number of rural UCs was more than the number of urban Ucs. Therefore this study was conducted in the rural areas of the Bahawalpur division. Due to the cost and time constraints, we possessively selected only three rural union councils from each tehsil, and in this way, a total of 42 union councils were considered for this study. The fixed 384 samples of each district were proportionately distributed from the district to the tehsils and from the tehsils to the UCs at the first stage. The households were selected randomly from the UCs following the lady health worker’s register record in the second stage. All three sample designs for the districts of the Bahawalpur division were based on the probability proportionate to size (PPS). All rural households in the division were included in the sampling frame. The rural households participating in the survey were picked at random from the records of the lady health workers (LHWs). If more than one family lived on the same property or if joint families were living in the same home, the survey treated them as nuclear families if they produced their own meals. Female healthcare workers who had obtained the necessary training before being tasked with conducting anthropometric measurements took the measurements.
The data were collected in the research area for five months, from November 2020 and April 2021. Two days before the data collection, the lady health professionals informed the women and their immediate relatives about the study’s purpose in their regional languages (Saraiki and Punjabi) to obtain their verbal agreement and expression of interest in taking part in the research. A total of 1152 mothers accepted to become part of the study willingly, and the mothers verbally consented at the time of the pre-interview meeting. Due to cultural restrictions and the fact that the majority of the mothers lacked formal education, written consent was not acquired. The sample size for each district was determined to be n = 384 households, with the confidence interval and confidence level set at 5%. This 384 sample size was kept fixed for each district in the Bahawalpur division. Thus, for the three districts, the total sample size came to 1152 respondents. The following information is provided, which determined the sample size:
Sample size = Z 2 ∗ (p) ∗ (1 − p)/c 2 Here:
Z = value of Z (i.e., 1.96 for a 95% confidence level), p = decimalized percentage of a choice’s selection (for the required sample size, we used 0.5), c = confidence interval in decimal form (e.g., 0.04 = ±4)
Size of Sample = (1.96) 2 ∗(0.5) ∗ (1 − 0.5)/(0.05) 2 = 384.16 = 384
Total sample of the Bahawalpur division = (Rahim Yar Khan district 384 + Bahawalpur district 384 + (Bahawalnagar district 384) = 1152
Table 1 shows the proportional distribution of each district to the council unions (N = 384 in tehsils):
NI = n ∗ Ni/N
The calculation for the formula for each UC sample = UCs 1–3 population/3 council unions total population*tehsil sample size, NI = in each union council, the number of sampled respondents, I = number of UCs in the research area, i.e., 1, 2, 3…, 42; n = sample’s total size.

3.3. Outcome Variable

In the study, the DV (CIAF) was dichotomized into two groups: “1”: an undernourished child, and “0”: not an undernourished child. A implies no failure, B means only stunted, C means only wasting, D means only underweight, E means both stunted and underweight, F means both wasting and underweight, and G means underweight, stunting, and wasting. These seven groups are used by the CIAF to categorize children. The CIAF assesses the prevalence of childhood malnutrition. Except for group A, all groups are added together to provide the overall estimate of child malnutrition prevalence. Following WHO’s standard guidelines for child growth (2009), the CIAF (outcome variable) was grounded on three indices, WAZ, WHZ, and HAZ, and was then followed by anthropometric measurements [30].

3.4. Measures

The Development of Household Deprivation Status: The household deprivation status index was employed in the proposed study used in India [31]. Recently, this index was also used in South Punjab, Pakistan [32]. The HDS index employs six variables: 1: the type of household (cemented or mud), 2: whether the household owns any land, 3: the presence or absence of an electricity facility in the house, 4: the presence or absence of a drinking fountain inside the home or household, 5: whether or not any one member of the family is literate, and 6: whether a newspaper, TV, or radio is kept in the house. These are binary in nature. The sum of all six variables yields overall scores, which vary from zero to six. Those without any of the six variables or only one or two items are encompassed in HDS-1 and are referred to as “MD”, which means moderate deprivation, indicating disadvantaged parts of the community. “JAD” means just above the deprivation and refers to persons who have three HDS-2s. Those with four or six items on the HDS-3 indicate “WAD”, which means well above the deprivation. The HDS does not directly evaluate a household’s financial circumstances, such as the total spending, per capita income, or the index of living standards; nevertheless, it broadens the measure to show households above the three dimensions as disadvantaged [31].
The Development of the Financial Stress Index During COVID-19: We constructed the FS index using existing research from PubMed and Google Scholar and also focused on the current COVID-19 situation, local study area, and study theme. We only reviewed papers examining the association between financial stress and malnutrition/health/COVID-19. The primary focus remained on research that used financial stress indicators or indexes and was further linked to health/malnutrition/COVID-19 issues.
We discovered 18 publications that directly addressed the association between financial stress and malnutrition/health/COVID-19. For a literature search, the following keywords were used: financial stress and malnutrition, (2) financial stress and COVID-19, (3) financial stress and health, and (4) the financial stress index and health.
Most of the studies concluded that financial stress arose due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and due to financial stress, people suffered in terms of fulfilling their nutritional needs, and the impact of household financial deprivation and stress significantly shifted from the family to the children. In the literature, the authors discovered that the information in the majority of studies on the financial stress indexes and variables were related to job losses in COVID-19, reductions in salaries, business losses or reduced business activities, sold assets to afford basic amenities of life, and borrowed money to meet expenses during COVID-19. We discussed this with a few experts on the subject after searching the relevant literature. All of the experts held doctoral degrees in psychology and public health. According to them, the financial stress tool should be simple, short, and easy to grasp for local respondents, with more focus on the current COVID-19 situation. As a result, the study integrated basic questions to create the financial stress index, which covered the essential variables that a typical respondent faced throughout COVID-19.
One of the important variables in this study was the financial stress index, which was produced as part of the study. Ten questions on respondents’ financial stress during COVID-19 that comprised this index were as follows: was there a: Reduced salary from the employer? Complete job loss? Business loss? Reduced business or work activities? Delay in receiving income? Reduction in saving or a dependency on saving? Reduction in remittances sent by family members from abroad or within the country? Situation of sold assets to afford basic amenities of life? Situation of sold livestock to afford the necessities of life? Situation of borrowing money from others to afford your family expenses?
The index is binary in nature; if the respondent answers “yes” to the question, it assigns a value equal to one; otherwise, it assigns a value equal to zero. This signal is further classified into three levels of stress: low, medium, and high. For the low financial stress group, the value range is 0–3, for the medium financial stress group, it is 4–7, and for the high financial stress group, it is 8–10. A high value indicates that the respondent, who represents a household, is under significant financial strain as a result of COVID-19.

3.5. Statistical Analysis

The study observed the impact of financial stress and household deprivation on the malnutritional status (CIAF) of children under five in the Bahawalpur region. The data were cleansed of any outliers prior to examining the connection between malnutrition and the explanatory factors. The Z-scores from the data that fell outside of the WHO flags were also disregarded. A total of 930 children were included in the study for analysis, while 621 children out of a total of 1551 children under the age of five were skipped from the analysis because the data were outside of the accepted range (less than −5 and more than +5). For each explanatory variable, descriptive statistics were used to determine the prevalence of CIAF (malnutrition). The logistic regression technique was used to evaluate the impact of various socio-economic characteristics, especially household deprivation status and financial stress, on the malnutritional statuses of children. The logistic regression model employed three levels of significance to demonstrate the significant link between the IV and the outcome variable, i.e., p 1%, p 5%, and p 10%. The STATA 15 statistical software was used for the data analysis.
The method of logistic regression divides the likelihood of malnourishment into two categories: “1” for malnourished children and “0” for healthy children. The premise was that a wide range of socio-economic determinants influences the status of childhood malnutrition. According to the socio-economic indicators, the logistic regression model calculates the likelihood of the outcome variable (child malnutrition). The DV or outcome variable was configured in binary nature (0 or 1). The specification form for the binary logistic regression is shown underneath:
P (Yi = 1|X1i, X2i…, Xkn) = F (β0+ β1× 1i + β2X2i + … + βnXkn)
In this equation, the dependent variable (CIAF) is denoted with the symbol Yi, which stands for the indicators of child malnutrition. X signifies the explanatory variables, β’s means the coefficients of interest, which describe how strongly the dependent variables are associated. Here, the dependent variable is Y, and if Yi = 1, this means a malnourished child, whereas if Yi = 0, the child is not malnourished. X= (X1i, X2i …, Xkn) are the IVs, and the independent variable’s observed value for observation i is xi.

3.6. Ethical Consideration

The departmental doctoral program coordination committee (DDPCC) of the University of Punjab Lahore authorized the research on 25 June 2020. The study’s instruments and methods were also examined and approved by the Institute of Social and Cultural Studies (ISCS). Before obtaining the data, the health officials, mothers, and LHWs were informed of all the study’s specifics, and oral and informed consent was obtained from all of them.

4. Results

4.1. Distribution of Data

A total of 1551 children had their anthropometric measures collected. Following the anthropometric evaluation, it was necessary to examine the data distribution. In the distribution, Z-scores between −1 SD and >−2 SD indicated the normal category, Z-scores between −2 SD and >−3 SD showed moderate malnourishment, and Z-scores between −3 SD and >−5 SD showed severe malnourishment. The WHO does not take Z-scores over 6 SD into consideration. Figure 2A–C shows that while there is very little evidence of wasting (WHZ), there are deficits in HAZ (stunting) and WAZ (underweight).
Figure 3 displays the graphical relationships between the various anthropometric indicators. Figure 3A–C shows that while no association is present between HAZ and WAZ, there is a weakly positive relationship between WAZ and WHZ, as well as HAZ and WHZ.

4.2. Descriptive Statistics

We calculated the prevalence rates for wasting, underweight, and stunting, which were 8.11%, 41.89%, and 58.86%, respectively, in the Bahawalpur region. In comparison, the overall malnutrition (CIAF) prevalence was 63.23%. Table 2 displays the malnutrition prevalence rates according to the child’s gender. In male children, the wasting and underweight rates were higher, while the stunting rates were higher in female children. Table 3 illuminates the frequency of malnourishment in children according to age (in months). The table depicts that the HAZ, WHZ, and WAZ rates are high in children aged 13–48 months.
Table 4 shows that during COVID-19, the stunting and underweight rates significantly increased from the provided rates before COVID-19 in the Bahawalpur division. Moreover, the Bahawalpur region had a high malnutrition prevalence in the region of Punjab. Table 5 shows the percentage of children that experienced CIAF (malnutrition) in relation to several explanatory variables.
Figure 4 shows the connection between household deprivation status (HDS) and child nutritional status. The HDS (1 and 2) is the most impoverished in society. The stunting, underweight, and wasting prevalence rates fall as the household moves from HDS 1 to 2 to 3. It shows that the increase in the basic necessities of life in households reduces the malnutrition prevalence in children.
Figure 5 shows the association between financial stress (FSI) and child malnutritional status. The figure depicts that the prevalence rates of wasting (WHZ), stunting (HAZ), and underweight (WAZ), decreased when the household shifted from high-stress to medium-stress and then low-stress continuously.

4.3. Estimates of Logistic Regression

Table 6 displays the CIAF logistic regression estimates. According to the findings, male children had a lower risk of malnutrition than their female counterparts (OR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.52–0.98). Low birth weight was linked to an increased danger of malnourishment in children between the ages of 13 and 36 months. Lower likelihoods of malnourishment were associated with birth order/interval of children aged four to five years (OR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.31–0.71). The risks of malnutrition in children were higher in mothers with BMIs higher than 18.5 kg/m2 (OR = 1.45, 95% CI: 0.95–2.21). Malnutrition among children under the age of five was more likely to occur in mothers without any employment or jobs (OR = 3.14, 95% CI: 0.81–12.18). Fathers with private employment or their firm had a lower likelihood of malnutrition in their children under five.
The risks of children being malnourished were lower across all household deprivation status (HDS) categories in the HDS-2 (OR = 0.05, 95% CI: 0. 005–0.879) and HDS-3 (OR = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.008–0.193) categories. According to the financial stress index (FSI) categories, the children belonging to households with medium financial stress had less danger of malnutrition (OR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.018–0.567), and the children from households with low financial stress had less danger of malnutrition (OR = 0.006, 95% CI: 0.005–0.061).

5. Discussion

This study constructed an index of financial stress created by the COVID-19 lockdown in Pakistan. Furthermore, it observed the impact of financial stress and household socio-economic deprivation during the COVID-19 lockdown on the nutritional statuses of children under five in one of the marginalized regions of South Punjab, Pakistan. The results of the study depicted that the prevalence of underweight children was 41.89%, and the prevalence of stunted children was 58.86% in the Bahawalpur division during the COVID-19 lockdown. Furthermore, the descriptive results illustrated that 2.55% and 88.7% of malnourished children belonged to the HDS-1 and HDS-2 households category, which shows the deprived segment of society. Moreover, 91.84% of malnourished children belonged to households that faced high financial stress during the COVID-19 lockdown in the Bahawalpur region.
The logistic results showed that male children had a lowered likelihood of becoming undernourished than their female counterparts. The results also depicted that the age of the children was linked with a higher malnutrition probability. Several studies argued that, in general, male children are preferred by their parents, and girls are more deprived than men, especially in terms of food and nutrition, so due to gender discrimination at home, girls are more likely to be malnourished than male children. [33,34]. However, some studies argued that male children are at higher levels of malnourishment compared to their female counterparts due to the poor socio-economic status of the household [35,36]. The preference for sons in poor societies is usually because sons are usually the source of income for the family, but females are a burden [37]. The injustice in food distribution is also present in disadvantaged houses in which mothers first feed their husbands and sons and then offer it to their daughters, and sometimes poor quality and deficient foods are left for the daughters [38]. Poverty in rural as well as deprived urban areas is higher in Pakistan, and girls and women are victimized in their nutritional intake and health outcomes [39].
Healthy mothers deliver healthy offspring. In the worst situation, a mother with a low BMI who is malnourished delivers a low-weight infant, and there is a high likelihood that those children may experience starvation during infancy [40]. Low BMIs in mothers (18.5 kg/m2) raise the risk of low-birth-weight infants [40]. The findings of our study demonstrate a substantial relationship between mothers’ BMI and the prevalence of malnutrition in children under the age of five. Our results do not agree with a previous investigation [41].
There may be a trade-off between a woman’s ability to work and her ability to provide for her children. If women work properly, child growth and care, particularly child nourishment, might be impacted because of the reduced time spent with the child owing to work [42]. However, women’s employment status also makes a separate contribution to children’s nutrition. The household’s ability to purchase food, maintain a healthy diet, and pay for the necessities of life is increased by the income of women. The results of the study explain that the mother's employment status was significantly associated with the child's malnutrition status. The findings of a study showed that working women in Pakistan’s households in the first two quintiles of the wealth index, the poorer and poorest, did not contribute to the nutritional status of the child. However, in the third and middle quintiles, working women did [43]. While child care should not be sacrificed, women’s employment should be sufficient to maintain the household’s socio-economic standing. During the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdowns, low work or employment conditions reduced incomes vital to nutrition and food security.
The findings show that the higher the birth order of children, the lower the likelihood of malnourishment. A study from Bangladesh also had similar results revealing that decreased chances of malnutrition were associated with children’s birth order when they were 4–5 years old [40]. However, it is likely that it does not rise linearly with birth order. Because natural foods, such as fruits, milk, and vegetables, are affordable and accessible in rural areas, it may be a reflection of the reality that the majority of parents were meeting their children’s basic nutritional needs. According to a study conducted in Nepal, severe acute malnutrition was significantly correlated with birth intervals of less than 24 months [44]. The same research showed that greater birth order dramatically enhanced the risk of stunting in Pakistan [45].
The results show that the fathers’ income status and household deprivation status were correlated with malnutrition status. In India, prior research has shown that household deprivation affects child nourishment in the destitute parts of society in comparison to households with access to more necessities [46]. According to a different study conducted in India, more than half of truly impoverished households have at least one child who is stunted or underweight when compared to their non-poor counterparts. This study used a relatively comparable assessment of household asset deprivation [47]. The likelihood of malnutrition was found to be higher in the most deprived index than in the least deprived in a similar study conducted in the UK. This study used a household deprivation index that includes six items: employment, income, health deficiencies, disabilities, skills and training, education, housing, and access to services. Additionally, those with medium-high malnourishment risks reside in neighborhoods with more deprived households [48].
Socio-economic inequality causes social injustices that ultimately result in hunger. According to research from India, one of the main causes of socio-economic inequality is the wealth status in children’s undernutrition [48]. In the Ecuadorian highlands, newborn malnutrition was highly correlated with socio-economic class [49]. According to a study including an HDS index based on housing, location, employment rates for men, car ownership, and access to low-quality social amenities, the malnourishment rates were greater in less privileged homes, where they were 6.9 % vs. 9.5 % in the most fortunate ones [50]. Additionally, in Kenya, a study found that children’s nutritional quality was significantly impacted by their household assets [51]. Research conducted in Pakistan also revealed that household social and economic disadvantage was a significant cause of child malnutrition. Recent literature in Pakistan highlighted that richer households have a lower probability of stunting and wasting prevalence [52]. A case study from the deprived region of Punjab Pakistan revealed that malnutrition chances decrease with an increase in wealth status from rich to the richest. The study revealed that as the household shifts from a lower socio-economic status (HDS-1) to a middle socio-economic status (HDS-2) and further to a rich socio-economic status (HDS-3), the rates of underweight and stunted children decrease [53].
The logistic results depicted that the malnutrition prevalence was higher among those children whose families have a high financial stress index. These studies concluded that parents are a crucial group of interest since parental financial distress could harm family life and children’s psychosocial development [54]. According to a study from Switzerland, even though they are less directly affected by the virus, children are paying a heavy price for the crisis’ indirect impacts, such as poor eating, effects on mental health, social isolation, addiction to screens, and a lack of access to education and healthcare, especially among marginalized communities [55].
A study depicted that perceived stress scale scores increased during the outbreak from low to moderate levels of stress, and some financial stresses, including job losses, were also linked to more severe depressive symptoms and COVID-19-related anxiety [56]. Another study illustrated that financial and psychological stressors related to COVID-19 were significantly linked with greater alcohol-related problems and different kinds of drinking behaviors [57]. Previous studies indicated that the economy and health are more at risk from the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the outbreak, 11% of Canadian respondents lost their jobs, while an additional 8% saw income reductions [58]. Another Canadian study found that juggling employment with childcare and homeschooling and financial instability are the main factors affecting family stress during COVID-19. Studies from central and southeastern Europe and China indicated that financial stress and related constructs (for example, money worries, financial anxiety, and worry) demonstrated a major impact on an individual’s quality of life [59,60]. Not having enough money to participate in the same activities and anticipating having more student loan debt were two of the top financial concerns for college students, according to research from Ohio, USA [61]. Another study from the USA indicated that financial stress and anxiety among workers could occasionally emerge as physical problems such as backaches, headaches, high blood pressure, and ulcers. Money problems have in the past been indirectly linked to employee performance, attrition, productivity, and healthcare expenditures [62]. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in financial hardship for 43% of participants in the USA, and this financial stress was significantly linked to an elevated risk of a clinically significant depression score, including income [63]. Respondents in another study reported that household finances were the main source of financial stress along with an immense amount of pressure to support their families during COVID-19 in Latino Americans [64]. A multivariate analysis from western Sydney, Australia, indicated that financial hardship factors, particularly job and housing security issues and the inability to pay mortgages or rents, established the highest connections with psychological suffering [65]. Studies from the UK have discovered a link between poorer mental health and having financial troubles, as well as worrying about money and having debt [66,67], as the COVID-19 pandemic contributed significantly to families’ financial stress [68]. Findings from Wales revealed that the COVID-19 pandemic aggravated mental health issues in children who were already at risk, and the negative effects of financial stress (e.g. the inability to pay expenses, loss of income, or job loss) were connected to the mental health of parents [69].

Strengths and Limitations of the Study

The study assessed the impact of household socio-economic deprivation and financial stress on child malnutrition which was specifically shaped by COVID-19 during the lockdown in rural areas of Southern Punjab, Pakistan. The data were collected from the rural areas of three districts with 1152 households. So, for policy purposes, the results and scope of this study could be generalized to the whole of rural Punjab, Pakistan. The limitation of this study is that the questions developed to design the financial stress index were related to stress and job loss issues that arose during COVID-19. Moreover, this study used a prearranged set of variables because of the importance of time to meet the objectives. The future directions could be how COVID-19 disrupted essential maternal and child health and child nutrition programs during the lockdown. Moreover, researchers could also conduct a post-COVID-19 analysis for the malnutrition prevalence and determine the factors which played a role in overcoming malnutrition in post-COVID-19.

6. Conclusions

The study assessed the effect of financial stress and household socio-economic deprivation on the nutritional statuses of children under five during the COVID-19 lockdown. The results of the study depicted that the prevalence of underweight children was 41.89%, and the prevalence of stunting was 58.86% in the Bahawalpur division during the COVID-19 lockdown. The logistic regression results depicted that gender, birth order, and age of the child, BMI and working status of the mother, and father or parental working status were the other significant determinants of child malnutrition status. Moreover, the results of the policy variables of our study (financial stress and household deprivation status) showed that the probability of the child being malnourished decreased with the rise in the social and economic status of the household. Similarly, the probability of child malnutrition decreased when a household shifted from high financial stress to medium financial stress and then low financial stress. In sum, our findings concluded that household socio-economic deprivation and financial stress created by the COVID-19 lockdown impacted the nutritional status (an increase of 17.26% stunted children and 12.29% underweight children). The socio-economic deprivation in downgraded areas contributed to malnourishment, which might be eliminated with equal possibilities for human growth and increased funding for disadvantaged groups in less developed areas in the form of social safety nets. Moreover, providing job security, especially during unexpected situations, such as COVID-19, would not only help people to feed their families but also overcome mental health issues.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B.A. and M.S.; Data curation, M.B.A. and M.S.; Formal analysis, M.B.A. and M.S.; Investigation, M.B.A. and M.S.; Methodology, M.B.A. and M.S.; Project administration, M.B.A., M.S. and R.Z.; Writing—original draft, M.B.A. and M.S.; Writing—review and editing, M.B.A. and M.S., B.I.A., J.Y., R.Z., N.I.M., A.B. and K.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We declare that the funding for publication of this study was supported by Tsinghua University Scientific Research Program (Number: 20213080011).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Departmental Doctoral Program Coordination Committee (DDPCC) of the University of Punjab, Lahore, authorized the research on 26 June 2020 [Number: ISCS-1068/2020 (Punjab University); Approved date: 26 June 2020]. The study’s instruments and methods were also examined and approved by the Institute of Social and Cultural Studies (ISCS).

Informed Consent Statement

All respondents were informed about the nature and purpose of the study before taking their formal oral consent. In addition, the privacy, anonymity, and confidentiality of all study participants were strictly ensured.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank all those who voluntarily participated in the study and helped in the data collection. The informed concent were obtained from all respondents of this study. This study is the part of PhD. dissertation of MBA submitted to school of Public Health, University of Punjab.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors disclose no potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Qureshi, M.G.; Shahid, M.; Ahmed, F.; Rafiq, S.; Malik, N.I. Congregational Religious Prayers amid Covid-19 and Pandemic Spread—Evidence from Southern Punjab, Pakistan. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Rev. 2021, 9, 1266–1277. [Google Scholar]
  2. Phan, D.H.B.; Narayan, P.K. Country responses and the reaction of the stock market to COVID-19—A preliminary exposition. Emerg. Mark. Finance Trade 2020, 56, 2138–2150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Qiu, Y.; Chen, X.; Shi, W. Impacts of social and economic factors on the transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China. J. Popul. Econ. 2020, 33, 1127–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rodrigues, M.; Silva, R.; Franco, M. COVID-19: Financial Stress and Well-Being in Families. J. Fam. Issues. 2021, 0. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Brodeur, A.; Gray, D.; Islam, A.; Bhuiyan, S. A literature review of the economics of COVID-19. J. Econ. Surv. 2021, 35, 1007–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Brewer, M.; Gardiner, L. The initial impact of COVID-19 and policy responses on household incomes. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 2020, 36, S187–S199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ntambara, J.; Chu, M. The risk to child nutrition during and after COVID-19 pandemic: What to expect and how to respond. Public Health Nutr. 2021, 24, 3530–3536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fore, H.H.; Dongyu, Q.; Beasley, D.M.; Ghebreyesus, T.A. Child malnutrition and COVID-19: The time to act is now. Lancet 2020, 396, 517–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Akseer, N.; Kandru, G.; Keats, E.C.; Bhutta, Z.A. COVID-19 pandemic and mitigation strategies: Implications for maternal and child health and nutrition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 112, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jayatissa, R.; Herath, H.P.; Perera, A.G.; Dayaratne, T.T.; De Alwis, N.D.; Nanayakkara, H.P.L.K. Impact of COVID-19 on child malnutrition, obesity in women and household food insecurity in underserved urban settlements in Sri Lanka: A prospective follow-up study. Public Health Nutr. 2021, 24, 3233–3241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mertens, E.; Peñalvo, J.L. The burden of malnutrition and fatal COVID-19: A global burden of disease analysis. Front. Nutr. 2021, 7, 619850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Littlejohn, P.; Finlay, B.B. When a pandemic and an epidemic collide: COVID-19, gut microbiota, and the double burden of malnutrition. BMC Med. 2021, 19, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sharma, S.V.; Chuang, R.J.; Rushing, M.; Naylor, B.; Ranjit, N.; Pomeroy, M.; Markham, C. Peer reviewed: Social determinants of health–related needs during COVID-19 among low-income households with children. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2020, 17, E119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Osendarp, S.; Akuoku, J.K.; Black, R.E.; Headey, D.; Ruel, M.; Scott, N.; Shekar, M.; Walker, N.; Flory, A.; Haddad, L.; et al. The COVID-19 crisis will exacerbate maternal and child undernutrition and child mortality in low-and middle-income countries. Nat. Food 2021, 2, 476–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Loperfido, L.; Burgess, M.; Arlini, S.M. The Hidden Impact of COVID-19 on Child Poverty; Save the Children International: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  16. United Nations. Impact of COVID-19 on Food Security and Nutrition (FSN); United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  17. Niles, M.T.; Bertmann, F.; Belarmino, E.H.; Wentworth, T.; Biehl, E.; Neff, R. The Early Food Insecurity Impacts of COVID-19. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Headey, D.; Heidkamp, R.; Osendarp, S.; Ruel, M.; Scott, N.; Black, R.; Shekar, M.; Bouis, H.; Flory, A.; Haddad, L.; et al. Impacts of COVID-19 on childhood malnutrition and nutrition-related mortality. Lancet 2020, 396, 519–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Headey, D.D.; Ruel, M.T. The COVID-19 nutrition crisis: What to expect and how to protect. In COVID-19 and Global Food Security; International Food Policy Research Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2020; pp. 38–41. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tester, J.M.; Rosas, L.G.; Leung, C.W. Food insecurity and pediatric obesity: A double whammy in the era of COVID-19. Curr. Obes. Rep. 2020, 9, 442–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. World Health Organization. Pulse Survey on Continuity of Essential Health Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Interim Report. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-%20nCoV-EHS_continuity-survey-2020.1 (accessed on 15 October 2022).
  22. UNICEF & WFP. Nutrition Crisis Looms as More than 39 Billion In-School Meals Missed Since Start of Pandemic. Available online: https://www.unicef.org/eap/press-releases/nutrition-crisis-looms-more-39-billion-school-meals-missed-start-pandemic-unicef-and#:~:text=NEW%20YORK%2FROME%2C%2028%20January,World%20Food%20Programme%20(WFP) (accessed on 15 October 2022).
  23. Rasheed, R.; Rizwan, A.; Javed, H.; Sharif, F.; Zaidi, A. Socio-economic and environmental impacts of COVID-19 pandemic in Pakistan—An integrated analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 19926–19943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Heo, W.; Cho, S.H.; Lee, P. APR Financial Stress Scale: Development and validation of a multidimensional measurement. J. Financ. Ther. 2020, 11, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gluckman, P.D.; Buklijas, T.; Hanson, M.A. The developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD) concept: Past, present, and future. In The Epigenome and Developmental Origins of Health and Disease; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pooler, J.; Perry, D.F.; Ghandour, R.M. Prevalence and risk factors for postpartum depressive symptoms among women enrolled in WIC. Matern. Child Health J. 2013, 17, 1969–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Becker, G.S. A Theory of the Allocation of Time. Econ. J. 1965, 75, 493–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Strauss, J.; Thomas, D. Human Resources: Empirical Modeling of Household and Family Decisions. In Handbook of Development Economics; Behrman, J.B., Srinivasan, T.N., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1995; Volume 3, pp. 1883–2023. [Google Scholar]
  29. Victora, C.G.; Huttly, S.R.; Fuchs, S.C.; Olinto, M.T. The role of conceptual frameworks in epidemiological analysis: A hierarchical approach. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1997, 26, 224–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. World Health Organization. Child Growth Standards and the Identification of Severe Acute Malnutrition in Infants and Children: A Joint Statement by the World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund, Geneva; WHO Press: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  31. Srinivasan, K.; Mohanty, S.K. Household deprivation and its linkages with reproductive health utilisation. Econ. Political Wkly. 2008, 43, 67–76. [Google Scholar]
  32. Shahid, M.; Cao, Y.; Ahmed, F.; Raza, S.; Guo, J.; Malik, N.I.; Rauf, U.; Qureshi, M.G.; Saheed, R.; Maryam, R. Does Mothers’ Awareness of Health and Nutrition Matter? A Case Study of Child Malnutrition in Marginalized Rural Community of Punjab, Pakistan. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 792164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Jawaregowda, S.K.; Angadi, M.M. Gender differences in nutritional status among under-five children in rural areas of Bijapur district, Karnataka, India. Int. J. Community Med. Public Health 2015, 2, 506–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Dhungana, G.P. Nutritional Status and the Associated Factors in Under Five Years Children of Lamjung, Gorkha and Tanahun Districts of Nepal. Nep. J. Stat. 2017, 1, 15–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Haq, I.; Hossain, M.I.; Parvin, M.M.; Saleheen, A.A.S.; Habib, M.J. Gender differences in child nutrition status of Bangladesh: A multinomial modeling approach. Int. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2021, 4, 379–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shahid, M.; Saheed, R.; Wang, J.; Qureshi, M.G.; Sun, X.; Bibi, A.; Zia, S.; Tang, K. Impact of Drinking Water Source and Sanitation Facility on Malnutrition Prevalence in Children under Three: A Gender-Disaggregated Analysis Using PDHS 2017–18. Children 2022, 9, 1674. [Google Scholar]
  37. Jayachandran, S.; Kuziemko, I. Why do mothers breastfeed girls less than boys? Evidence and implications for child health in India. Q. J. Econ. 2011, 126, 1485–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Arif, G.M.; Nazir, S.; Satti, M.N.; Farooq, S. Child malnutrition in Pakistan: Trends and determinants. Pak. Inst. Dev. Econ. 2012, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  39. Heise, L.; Greene, M.E.; Opper, N.; Stavropoulou, M.; Harper, C.; Nascimento, M.; Zewdie, D.; Darmstadt, G.L.; Greene, M.E.; Hawkes, S. Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: Framing the challenges to health. Lancet 2019, 393, 2440–2454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Khan, E.A.; Raza, M.A. Nutritional status of children in Bangladesh: Measuring composite index of anthropometric failure (CIAF) and its determinants. Pak. J. Commer. Soc. Sci. 2014, 8, 11–23. [Google Scholar]
  41. Menon, P.; Headey, D.; Avula, R.; Nguyen, P.H. Understanding the geographical burden of stunting in India: A regression-decomposition analysis of district-level data from 2015–16. Matern. Child Nutr. 2018, 14, e12620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nair, M.; Ohuma, E.; Ariana, P.; Webster, P.; Gray, R. Effect of the Mahatma Gandhi national rural employment guarantee act on malnutrition of children aged between 1 and 12 months in Rajasthan, India: A mixed methods study. Lancet 2012, 380, S9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shahid, M. Interaction of Household Wealth and Women’s Working Status on Child Malnutrition: Evidence from PDHS-2013. Pak. Perspect. 2020, 25, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pravana, N.K.; Piryani, S.; Chaurasiya, S.P.; Kawan, R.; Thapa, R.K.; Shrestha, S. Determinants of severe acute malnutrition among children under 5 years of age in Nepal: A community-based case–control study. BMJ Open 2017, 7, e017084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Tariq, J.; Sajjad, A.; Zakar, R.; Zakar, M.Z.; Fischer, F. Factors associated with undernutrition in children under the age of two years: Secondary data analysis based on the Pakistan demographic and health survey 2012–2013. Nutrients 2018, 10, 676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Srinivasan, K.; Mohanty, S.K. of Basic Amenities Deprivation and by Caste Religion Empirical. Econ. Polit. Wkly. 2004, 39, 728–735. [Google Scholar]
  47. Stratton, R.J.; Elia, M. Deprivation linked to malnutrition risk and mortality in hospital. Br. J. Nutr. 2006, 96, 870–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Rabbani, A.; Khan, A.; Yusuf, S.; Adams, A. Trends and determinants of inequities in childhood stunting in Bangladesh from 1996/7 to 2014. Int. J. Equity Health 2016, 15, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Ortiz, J.; Van Camp, J.; Wijaya, S.; Donoso, S.; Huybregts, L. Determinants of child malnutrition in rural and urban Ecuadorian highlands. Public Health Nutr. 2014, 17, 2122–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Armstrong, J.; Dorosty, A.R.; Reilly, J.J.; Emmett, P.M. Coexistence of social inequalities in undernutrition and obesity in preschool children: Population based cross sectional study. Arch. Dis. Childh. 2003, 88, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Fotso, J.C.; Madise, N.; Baschieri, A.; Cleland, J.; Zulu, E.; Mutua, M.K.; Essendi, H. Child growth in urban deprived settings: Does household poverty status matter? At which stage of child development? Health Place 2012, 18, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Lubna, N.; Kamalesh, K.P.; Ifeoma, E.U. The prevalence of undernutrition and associated factors among preschool children: Evidence from Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2017-18. Child Youth Serv. Rev. 2020, 119, 105579. [Google Scholar]
  53. Shahid, M.; Ahmed, F.; Ameer, W.; Guo, J.; Raza, S.; Fatima, S.; Qureshi, G.M. Prevalence of child malnutrition and household socioeconomic deprivation: A case study of marginalized district in Punjab, Pakistan. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0263470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Raviv, T.; Wadsworth, M.E. The efficacy of a pilot prevention program for children and caregivers coping with economic strain. Cognitive Ther. Res. 2010, 34, 216–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zemrani, B.; Gehri, M.; Masserey, E.; Knob, C.; Pellaton, R. A hidden side of the COVID-19 pandemic in children: The double burden of undernutrition and overnutrition. Int. J. Equity Health 2021, 20, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Reilly, T.J.; MacGillivray, S.A.; Reid, I.C.; Cameron, I.M. Psychometric properties of the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2015, 60, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rodriguez, L.M.; Litt, D.M.; Stewart, S.H. COVID-19 psychological and financial stress and their links to drinking: A dyadic analysis in romantic couples. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 2021, 35, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Robillard, R.; Saad, M.; Edwards, J.; Solomonova, E.; Pennestri, M.H.; Daros, A.; Kendzerska, T. Social, financial and psychological stress during an emerging pandemic: Observations from a population survey in the acute phase of COVID-19. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e043805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Carroll, N.; Sadowski, A.; Laila, A.; Hruska, V.; Nixon, M.; Ma, D.W.L.; Haines, J.; on behalf of the Guelph Family Health Study. The Impact of COVID-19 on Health Behavior, Stress, Financial and Food Security among Middle to High Income Canadian Families with Young Children. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kamberi, E.; Martinovic, B.; Verkuyten, M. Life satisfaction and happiness among the Roma in Central and Southeastern Europe. Soc. Indic. Res. 2015, 124, 199–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yeung, W.J.; Xu, Z. Economic stress, quality of life, and mortality for the oldest old in China. Soc. Indic. Res. 2012, 108, 131–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Heckman, S.; Lim, H.; Montalto, C. Factors Related to Financial Stress among College Students. J. Financ. Ther. 2014, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Thayer, Z.M.; Gildner, T.E. COVID-19-related financial stress associated with higher likelihood of depression among pregnant women living in the United States. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2021, 33, e23508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Blanco, L.; Cruz, V.; Frederick, D.; Herrera, S. Financial stress among Latino Adults in California during COVID-19. J. Econ. Race Policy 2022, 5, 134–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Taylor, M.; Stevens, G.; Agho, K.; Raphael, B. The impacts of household financial stress, resilience, social support, and other adversities on the psychological distress of Western Sydney parents. Int. J. Popul. Res. 2017, 2017, 6310683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. McCloud, T.; Bann, D. Financial stress and mental health among higher education students in the UK up to 2018: Rapid review of evidence. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2019, 73, 977–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Fox, J.; Bartholomae, S. Household finances, financial planning, and COVID-19. Financ. Plan. Rev. 2020, 3, e1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Friedline, T.; Chen, Z.; Morrow, S.P. Families’ financial stress & well-being: The importance of the economy and economic environments. J. Fam. Econ. Issues 2021, 42, 34–51. [Google Scholar]
  69. Adegboye, D.; Williams, F.; Collishaw, S.; Shelton, K.; Langley, K.; Hobson, C.; van Goozen, S. Understanding why the COVID-19 pandemic-related lockdown increases mental health difficulties in vulnerable young children. JCPP Adv. 2021, 1, e12005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Children 10 00012 g001 550
Figure 1. Study’s conceptual framework for the child malnutrition determinants.
Figure 1. Study’s conceptual framework for the child malnutrition determinants.
Children 10 00012 g001
Children 10 00012 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) Distribution of the Z-Scores for HAZ, (B) distribution of the Z-Scores for WAZ, and (C) distribution of the Z-Scores for WAZ.
Figure 2. (A) Distribution of the Z-Scores for HAZ, (B) distribution of the Z-Scores for WAZ, and (C) distribution of the Z-Scores for WAZ.
Children 10 00012 g002
Children 10 00012 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) Correlation between the stunting and underweight variables, (B) correlation between the wasting and underweight variables, and (C) correlation between the stunting and wasting variables.
Figure 3. (A) Correlation between the stunting and underweight variables, (B) correlation between the wasting and underweight variables, and (C) correlation between the stunting and wasting variables.
Children 10 00012 g003
Children 10 00012 g004 550
Figure 4. Malnutrition Prevalence by Household Deprivation Status. Source: author.
Figure 4. Malnutrition Prevalence by Household Deprivation Status. Source: author.
Children 10 00012 g004
Children 10 00012 g005 550
Figure 5. Malnutrition Prevalence by Financial Stress. Source: author.
Figure 5. Malnutrition Prevalence by Financial Stress. Source: author.
Children 10 00012 g005
Table
Table 1. Sample size proportional distribution from the sub-districts to the council unions.
Table 1. Sample size proportional distribution from the sub-districts to the council unions.
Division
/Region		DistrictsTehsilsCouncil Union NumberProportionate Sample/HH
Bahawalpur1. Rahimyar Khan District
Sample = 384
(100%)		Khanpur
Sample = 96		UC126
UC234
UC336
Liaquatpur
Sample = 81		UC425
UC526
UC630
Rahimyar Khan
Sample = 115		UC734
UC846
UC935
Sadiqabad
Sample = 92		UC1033
UC1132
UC1227
2. Bahawalpur District
Sample = 384
(100%)		Bahawalpur
Sample = 111		UC1329
UC1439
UC1543
Hasilpur
Sample = 65		UC1627
UC1711
UC1827
Khairpur Tamewali
Sample = 54		UC1918
UC2023
UC2113
Yazman
Sample = 77		UC2210
UC2341
UC2426
Ahmad Pur East
Sample = 77		UC2536
UC2620
UC2721
3. Bahawalnagar District
Sample = 384
(100%)		Bahawalnagar
Sample = 100		UC2837
UC2948
UC3015
Chishtian
Sample = 92		UC3120
UC3254
UC3314
Fort Abbas
Sample = 54		UC347
UC3523
UC3626
Haroonabad
Sample = 73		UC3755
UC3812
UC397
Minchinabad
Sample = 65		UC4010
UC4127
UC4229
Districts = 3Tehsils = 14Total UCs = 42HH = 1152
Source: the authors.
Table
Table 2. Malnutrition prevalence according to the sex of the child.
Table 2. Malnutrition prevalence according to the sex of the child.
IndicatorsStunting
(n = 948)		Underweight
(n = 1368)		Wasting
(n = 1221)		CIAF
(n = 930)
N%N%N%N%
Male26447.3130052.365757.5827947.45
Female29452.6927347.644242.4230952.55
Total55858.8657341.89998.1158863.23
Source: the authors.
Table
Table 3. Prevalence Of Malnutrition in Children according to Age (In Months).
Table 3. Prevalence Of Malnutrition in Children according to Age (In Months).
IndicatorsStunting
(n = 948)		Underweight
(n = 1368)		Wasting
(n = 1221)		CIAF
(n = 930)
N%N%N%N%
0–12 months519.1410518.321818.18579.69
13–24 months7813.9814425.132424.247813.27
25–36 months17130.6516528.801818.1818030.61
37–48 months14125.2710518.322727.2715326.02
49–60 months11720.97549.421212.1212020.41
Total55858.8657341.89998.1158863.23
Source: the authors.
Table
Table 4. Comparison of the Stunting, Wasting, and Underweight prevalence before and during COVID-19 in the Bahawalpur division.
Table 4. Comparison of the Stunting, Wasting, and Underweight prevalence before and during COVID-19 in the Bahawalpur division.
StuntingUnderweightWasting
Pakistan38%23%8%
Punjab31.5%21.2%7.5%
Bahawalpur Division Before COVID-1941.6%29.6%8.3%
Bahawalpur Division During COVID-1958.86%41.89%8.11%
Source: the national rates (PDHS-2017-18), provincial and Bahawalpur division rates before COVID-19 (MICS- 2017-18), and during COVID-19 rates are calculated through the study surveyed data (collected from July 2020 and November 2020).
Table
Table 5. Descriptive analysis concerning the relationship between several socio-economic factors and CIAF/malnutrition (N = 930).
Table 5. Descriptive analysis concerning the relationship between several socio-economic factors and CIAF/malnutrition (N = 930).
VariablesCategoriesF%p-Values
Child Gender Male27947.450.011 ***
Female30952.55
Child Age (Months)0 to 12 579.690.000 ***
13–247813.27
25–3618030.61
37–4815326.02
49–60 12020.41
Number of Order of BirthBirth order 116526.530.000 ***
2 or 323740.31
4 or 512320.92
6 or above7212.24
Mother BMILess than 18.5 kg/m27813.270.014 ***
Equal to or more than 18.5 kg/m251086.73
Education of MotherNo education45076.530.000 ***
Primary6611.22
Middle427.14
Matric183.06
FA and higher122.04
Education of FatherNo education40568.880.489
Primary10517.86
Middle213.57
Matric488.16
FA and higher91.53
Working Status of MotherWorking91.530.000 ***
Not working57998.47
Working Status of FatherGovt. job244.080.001 ***
Private job254.09
Own business7512.76
Labor or daily wages and agriculture46579.08
Household Deprivation Status (HDS)HDS-1152.550.017 **
HDS-255288.78
HDS-3518.67
Financial Stress High-stress54091.840.000 ***
Medium-stress335.61
Low-stress152.55
Source: the authors’ estimation [level of significance: ** if p < 0.05, *** if p < 0.01].
Table
Table 6. Results for child malnutrition and its correlations from the binary logistic regression analysis.
Table 6. Results for child malnutrition and its correlations from the binary logistic regression analysis.
VariablesCategoriesOdd. Ratiosp-ValesCI: 95%
Child Gender (Female-reference)Male0.720.04 **(0.52–0.98)
Age of Child (0 to 12 months-reference)13–24 months2.520.006 ***(1.31–4.87)
25–36 months8.430.000 ***(4.45–16.03)
37–48 months1.160.57(0.69–1.91)
49–60 months0.940.82(0.56–1.58)
Birth Order Number
(Birth order 1-reference)		2 or 3 0.800.29(0.54–1.21)
4 or 50.470.000 ***(0.31–0.71)
6 or above1.180.56(0.67–2.07)
Mother’s BMI (less than 18.5 kg/m2-reference)Equal to or more than18.5 kg/m21.450.08 **(0.95–2.21)
Education of mother (illiterate-reference)Primary0.860.81(0.24–3.04)
Middle0.850.84(0.22–3.31)
Matric and higher0.320.14(0.07–1.46)
Education of father (illiterate-reference)Primary0.670.54(0.19–2.35)
Middle2.030.32(0.51–8.11)
Matric and higher5.990.31(0.61, 59.29)
Mother’s Working Status (Working-reference)Not working3.140.09 **(0.81–12.18)
Working Status of Father
(Govt. Job-reference)		Daily wage or labor and agriculture0.520.46(0.09–2.95)
Private job0.180.05 **(0.04–0.96)
Own business 0.050.002 ***(0.007–0.35)
Household Deprivation Status
(HDS-1-reference)		HDS-20.050.027 **(0. 005–0.879)
HDS-30.040.000 ***(0.008–0.193)
Financial Stress (High-reference)Medium0.100.009 ***(0.018–0.567)
Low0.0060.000 ***(0.005–0.061)
The model’s overall significance
Number of Observations = 930Prob > Chi2 = 0.0000
LR Chi2 (26) = 231.56Pseudo R2 = 0.1910
Source: Authors’ estimation References: odds ratios; confidence intervals. R: reference category in the model. Significance level: *** if p < 1%; ** if p < 5%.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alam, M.B.; Shahid, M.; Alzghoul, B.I.; Yang, J.; Zakar, R.; Malik, N.I.; Bibi, A.; Tang, K. The Effects of Financial Stress and Household Socio-Economic Deprivation on the Malnutrition Statuses of Children under Five during the COVID-19 Lockdown in a Marginalized Region of South Punjab, Pakistan. Children 2023, 10, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10010012

AMA Style

Alam MB, Shahid M, Alzghoul BI, Yang J, Zakar R, Malik NI, Bibi A, Tang K. The Effects of Financial Stress and Household Socio-Economic Deprivation on the Malnutrition Statuses of Children under Five during the COVID-19 Lockdown in a Marginalized Region of South Punjab, Pakistan. Children. 2023; 10(1):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10010012

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alam, Muhammad Babar, Muhammad Shahid, Bashar Isam Alzghoul, Juan Yang, Rubeena Zakar, Najma Iqbal Malik, Asma Bibi, and Kun Tang. 2023. "The Effects of Financial Stress and Household Socio-Economic Deprivation on the Malnutrition Statuses of Children under Five during the COVID-19 Lockdown in a Marginalized Region of South Punjab, Pakistan" Children 10, no. 1: 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10010012

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop