Study on the Mechanism of Influencing Adolescents’ Willingness to Participate in Ice Sports
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Theoretical Foundation
1.2. Research Hypothesis
- Stimulus (S)—Motivation (M)
- Stimulus (S)—Ability (A)
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Design and Participants
2.2. Measurement
2.2.1. Physical Activity Motivation Measure (MPAM-R)
2.2.2. Exercise Condition Measure
2.2.3. Scientific Exercise Knowledge Scale
2.2.4. Perceptual Measurement Questionnaire
2.2.5. Willingness to Participate in the Movement Scale Questionnaire
2.3. Statistics and Processing of Data
3. Results
3.1. Preliminary Analysis
3.2. Hypothesis Testing
3.3. Agency Analysis
4. Discussion
4.1. The Influence of Participation Ability on Participation Willingness
4.2. The Effect of Perceived Usefulness on Willingness to Participate
4.3. The Influence of Participation Motivation on Participation Willingness
4.4. The Effect of Perceived Risk on Participation Willingness
4.5. Strength and Limitations
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhang, Y.T.; Ma, S.X.; Chen, C.; Liu, S.J.; Zhang, C.F.; Cao, Z.B.; Jiang, F. Physical activity guide for Chinese children and adolescents. Chin. J. Evid. Based Pediatr. 2017, 12, 401–409. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, L.; Li, H. A Meta-analysis of physical activity among Chinese children and adolescents with accelerometer data. Chin. J. Sch. Health 2020, 41, 173–178. [Google Scholar]
- Shan, M.; Zhou, N. Research progress on physical activity of Chinese children. Chin. J. Sch. Health 2021, 42, 1275–1280. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, G.S. Report on Childhood Obesity in China; People’s Medical Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Zahrt, O.H.; Crum, A.J. Effects of physical activity recommendations on mindset, behavior and perceived health. Prev. Med. Rep. 2019, 17, 101027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haynes, A.; McVeigh, J.; Hissen, S.L.; Howie, E.K.; Eastwood, P.R.; Straker, L.; Mori, T.A.; Beilin, L.; Ainslie, P.N.; Green, D.J. Participation in sport in childhood and adolescence: Implications for adult fitness. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2021, 24, 908–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Horak, R.; Spitaler, G. Sport Space and National Identity: Soccer and Skiing as Formative Forces: On the Austrian Example. Am. Behav. Sci. 2003, 46, 1506–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weinberg, R.; Tenenbaum, G.; McKenzie, A.; Jackson, S.; Anshel, M.; Grove, R.; Fogarty, G. Motivation for youth participation in sport and physical activity: Relationships to culture, self-reported activity levels, and gender. Int. J. Sport Psychol. 2000, 31, 321–346. [Google Scholar]
- Gomes, A.R.; Gonçalves, A.M.; Maddux, J.E.; Carneiro, L. The intention-behaviour gap: An empirical examination of an integrative perspective to explain exercise behaviour. Int. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2018, 16, 607–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohiyeddini, C.; Pauli, R.; Bauer, S. The role of emotion in bridging the intention–behaviour gap: The case of sports participation. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2009, 10, 226–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pang, B.; Liu, J. The value and implementation path of ice sports into the campus. Sport. Cult. Guide 2019, 1, 88–93. [Google Scholar]
- Rui, Q. Research on the Development Status and Countermeasures of Ice Sports in Primary and Secondary Schools in Haidian District; Capital Physical Education Institute: Beijing, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, W.; Feng, Z. Adolescents’ ice and snow sports in China on campus: Influencing factors, promoting mechanism and practical path. Sport. Sci. 2020, 7, 40–48. [Google Scholar]
- van Ingen Schenau, G.J.; De Boer, R.W.; De Groot, G. On the Technique of Speed Skating. Int. J. Sport Biomech. 1987, 3, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wagstaff, M.; Attarian, A. Technical Skills for Adventure Programming: A Curriculum Guide; Human Kinetics Publishers: Champaign, IL, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Schuler, T.V.; Crochet, P.; Hock, R.; Jackson, M.; Barstad, I.; Jóhannesson, T. Distribution of snow accumulation on the Svartisen ice cap, Norway, assessed by a model of orographic precipitation. Hydrol. Process. 2008, 22, 3998–4008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, P. Enlightenment of the development of Russian ice and snow sports industry to China. In Proceedings of the 11th National Sports Science Conference, Nanjing, China, 1 November 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, T.; Liu, T.; Ge, N. Research on the talent training system of ice and snow competitive sports in South Korea. Ice Snow Sport. 2018, 40, 42–45+58. [Google Scholar]
- The Canadian Olympic School Program. Available online: https://olympics.com/ioc/education/olympic-values-and-education-program/past-initiatives/canadian-olympic-school-programme (accessed on 3 March 2023).
- Baker, J.; Cobley, S.; Fraser-Thomas, J. What do we know about early sport specialization? Not much! High Abil. Stud. 2009, 20, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gould, D. Early Sport Specialization. J. Phys. Educ. Recreat. Danc. 2010, 81, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheeran, P. Intention—Behavior Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 2002, 12, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cipriani, K.; Richardson, C.; Roberts, G. Family and Community Involvement in the Comprehensive School Physical Activity Program. J. Phys. Educ. Recreat. Dance 2012, 83, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, X.; Chen, P.; Cao, Z. Physical Activity among Chinese School-Aged Children: National Prevalence Estimates from the 2016 Physical Activity and Fitness in China: The Adolescents’ Study; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; Volume 6, pp. 388–394. [Google Scholar]
- Koring, M.; Richert, J.; Parschau, L.; Ernsting, A.; Lippke, S.; Schwarzer, R. A combined planning and self-efficacy intervention to promote physical activity: A multiple mediation analysis. Psychol. Health Med. 2012, 17, 488–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehrabian, A.; Russell, J.A. An Approach to Environmental Psychology; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Z. The Formation, Development and Core Constructs of MOA. Res. Libr. Sci. 2013, 13, 53–57. [Google Scholar]
- Ölander, F.; ThØgersen, J. Understanding of consumer behaviour as a prerequisite for environmental protection. J. Consum. Policy 1995, 18, 345–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Legris, P.; Ingham, J.; Collerette, P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 2003, 40, 191–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hung, K.; Sirakaya-Turk, E.; Ingram, L.J. Testing the Efficacy of an Integrative Model for Community Participation. J. Travel Res. 2010, 50, 276–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, J. The role of natural soundscape in nature-based tourism experience: An extension of the stimulus–organism–response model. Curr. Issues Tour. 2022, 25, 707–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Li, J. Factors Influencing the Consumers’ Willingness to Buy in E-Commerce. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on E-Business and Information System Security, Wuhan, China, 23–24 May 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Souza, L.L.F.d.; Freitas, A.A.F.d. Consumer behavior of electronic games’ players: A study on the intentions to play and to pay. Rev. Adm. 2017, 52, 419–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rothschild, M.L. Carrots, Sticks, and Promises: A Conceptual Framework for the Management of Public Health and Social Issue Behaviors. J. Mark. 1999, 63, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hallahan, K. Enhancing motivation, ability, and opportunity to process public relations messages. Public Relat. Rev. 2001, 26, 463–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Štrach, P.; Everett, A.M. Knowledge transfer within Japanese multinationals: Building a theory. J. Knowl. Manag. 2006, 10, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyde, P.; Harris, C.; Boaden, R.; Cortvriend, P. Human relations management, expectations and healthcare: A qualitative study. Hum. Relat. 2009, 62, 701–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siemsen, E.; Roth, A.V.; Balasubramanian, S. How motivation, opportunity, and ability drive knowledge sharing: The constraining-factor model. J. Oper. Manag. 2013, 26, 426–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, L.; Yang, J.; Zhou, B. Research on the online purchase intention of consumer sporting goods: An empirical test based on four competitive models. J. Hebei Inst. Phys. Educ. 2022, 36, 59–69. [Google Scholar]
- Meng, C.; Zhang, S. Study on the influence of online store characteristics of sporting goods based on technical acceptance model on users’ purchase intention—Take Oawa Ping-pong as an example. J. Shandong Univ. Phys. Educ. 2018, 34, 16–24. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, L. Study on the Influencing Factors of Online Sports Consumption Behavior in College Students Based on TPB and TAM Models; South-Central South University for Nationalities: Changsha, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Slovic, P. Perception of Risk. Science 1987, 236, 280–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slovic, P.; Finucane, M.L.; Peters, E.; MacGregor, D.G. Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality. Risk Anal. 2004, 24, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiu, C.-M.; Hsu, M.-H.; Wang, E.T. Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decis. Support Syst. 2006, 42, 1872–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- King, W.R.; He, J. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 2006, 43, 740–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schepers, J.; Wetzels, M. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Inf. Manag. 2007, 44, 90–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shu, Y. The relationship between the three major forces of psychology and the study of motivation. Northwest Norm. Univ. Newsp. (Soc. Sci. Ed.) 2011, 48, 87–91. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, L. Current situation, risk prevention and guarantee mechanism for teenagers’ participation in ice and snow sports. Ice Snow Sport. 2018, 40, 37–40+79. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, S.; Tian, S.; Ma, Z. Intention to study ice and snow sports participation among college students based on the integration model of TPB and SDM. Phys. Educ. Res. Educ. 2021, 36, 80–84. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J. A psychological analysis of the participation and persistence of the public sports. Ind. Technol. Forum 2011, 10, 136–138. [Google Scholar]
- Raynor, D.A.; Coleman, K.J.; Epstein, L.H. Effects of Proximity on the Choice to Be Physically Active or Sedentary. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 1998, 69, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, H. Promotion Mechanism and Optimization Strategy of Ice and Snow Sports on Campus; Sports Culture Guide: Beijing, China, 2022; pp. 22–28. [Google Scholar]
- Ci, X. The Policy of Entering Ice Sports on Campus Only Is Not Enough; China Adolescents’ Daily: Beijing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, H.; Wu, X. The role, value, and path of physical health knowledge in promoting physical activity in adolescents. China Sport. Sci. Technol. 2021, 57, 72–78. [Google Scholar]
- Davis, F.D. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. Mis Q. 1989, 13, 319–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Donghe, L.; Luxu, Z. Model of influential factors for downloading and using tourism Apps based on a technology acceptance model. Tour. Trib. 2015, 30, 26–34. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.; Goh, D.H.-L. Video Game Acceptance: A Meta-Analysis of the Extended Technology Acceptance Model. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2017, 20, 662–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richard, M.; Christina, M.F.; Deborah, L.S.; Rubio, N.; Kennon, M.S. Intrinsic motivation and exercise adherence. Int. J. Sport Psychol. 1997, 28, 335–354. [Google Scholar]
- Qiu, F.; Cui, D.; Yang, J. Impact factors of physical exercise behavior based on exercise commitment. J. Tianjin Inst. Phys. Educ. 2011, 26, 384–389. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, Y. Study on Element Structure and Simulation of Scientific Fitness Gene System for College Students; Shandong University: Jinan, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, G.; Li, J. Study on the cultivation structure of adolescents’ sports Behavior in China. J. Xi’an Univ. Phys. Educ. 2018, 35, 693–699. [Google Scholar]
- Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 2000, 55, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Meuter, M.L.; Bitner, M.J.; Ostrom, A.L.; Brown, S.W.; Chung, N.; Tyan, I.; Han, H.; Ramadan, Z.B.; Farah, M.F.; Mrad, M.; et al. Choosing among Alternative Service Delivery Modes: An Investigation of Customer Trial of Self-Service Technologies. J. Mark. 2005, 69, 61–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Macinnis, D.J.; Moorman, C.; Jaworski, B.J. Enhancing and Measuring Consumers Motivation, Opportunity, and Ability to Process Brand Information from Ads. J. Mark. 1991, 55, 32–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chen, H.; Wu, X. Route of Promotion of Health-Related Fitness Knowledge’s Role and Value on Physical Activity. China Sport Sci. Technol. 2021, 8, 72–78. [Google Scholar]
- Davis, F.; Bagozzi, R.; Warshaw, P. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Manag. Sci. 1989, 35, 982–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhao, H.; Li, R. Theoretical Model and Practice of the Impact of Participation Motivation on Behavior Intention in National Fitness Tennis Events. J. Shenyang Sport Univ. 2021, 6, 56–64. [Google Scholar]
- Kunasekaran, P.; Rasoolimanesh, S.M.; Wang, M.; Ragavan, N.A.; Hamid, Z.A. Enhancing local community participation towards heritage tourism in Taiping, Malaysia: Application of the Motivation-Opportunity-Ability (MOA) model. J. Heritage Tour. 2022, 17, 465–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deci, E.; Ryan, R.M. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. In Perspectives in Social Psychology; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- Vallerand, R.J.; Losier, G.F. An integrative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 1999, 11, 142–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weinberg, R.S.; Gould, D. Foundations of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 5th ed.; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, J.; Ha, I.; Choi, M.; Rho, J.J. Extending the TAM for a t-commerce. Inf. Manag. 2005, 42, 965–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bandura, A.; Freeman, W.H.; Lightsey, R. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1999. [Google Scholar]
Variables | Cronbach’s α | AVE | CR | KMO | Bartlett’s Spherical Test | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Motivation to Participate | Health Motivation | 0.958 | 0.712 | 0.832 | 0.962 | <0.0001 |
Ability Motivation | 0.846 | 0.916 | ||||
Interest Motivation | 0.774 | 0.872 | ||||
Appearance Motivation | 0.665 | 0.799 | ||||
Social Motivation | 0.618 | 0.763 | ||||
Opportunity to Participate | 0.771 | 0.683 | 0.895 | 0.841 | <0.0001 | |
Ability to Participate | Knowledge Base | 0.913 | 0.622 | 0.832 | 0.915 | <0.0001 |
Physical Skills | 0.665 | 0.856 | ||||
Perceived Ease of Use | 0.865 | 0.586 | 0.703 | 0.87 | <0.0001 | |
Perceived Usefulness | 0.957 | 0.85 | 0.958 | 0.868 | <0.0001 | |
Perceived Riskiness | 0.850 | 0.62 | 0.862 | 0.746 | <0.0001 | |
Willingness to participate | 0.727 | 0.571 | 0.701 | 0.732 | <0.0001 |
1. Health Motivation | 2. Ability Motivation | 3. Interest Motivation | 4. Appearance Motivation | 5. Social Motivation | 6. Opportunity to Participate | 7. Knowledge Base | 8. Physical Skills | 9. Perceived Ease of Use | 10. Perceived Usefulness | 11. Perceived Riskiness | 12. Willingness to Participate | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.844 | |||||||||||
2 | 0.792 ** | 0.92 | ||||||||||
3 | 0.803 ** | 0.867 ** | 0.88 | |||||||||
4 | 0.792 ** | 0.844 ** | 0.848 ** | 0.815 | ||||||||
5 | 0.757 ** | 0.754 ** | 0.828 ** | 0.796 ** | 0.786 | |||||||
6 | 0.321 | 0.292 | 0.317 | 0.327 | 0.345 | 0.826 | ||||||
7 | 0.296 | 0.256 | 0.288 | 0.308 | 0.326 | 0.704 ** | 0.789 | |||||
8 | 0.286 | 0.229 | 0.269 | 0.283 | 0.306 | 0.735 ** | 0.84 ** | 0.815 | ||||
9 | 0.348 | 0.321 | 0.334 | 0.362 | 0.355 | 0.74 ** | 0.697 ** | 0.688 ** | 0.609 | |||
10 | 0.717 ** | 0.69 ** | 0.766 ** | 0.746 ** | 0.862 ** | 0.363 | 0.359 | 0.349 | 0.377 | 0.922 | ||
11 | 0.342 | 0.316 | 0.334 | 0.344 | 0.365 | 0.897 ** | 0.731 ** | 0.735 ** | 0.532 * | 0.369 | 0.787 | |
12 | 0.655 * | 0.634 * | 0.704 ** | 0.694 ** | 0.735 ** | 0.578 * | 0.636 * | 0.629 * | 0.595 * | 0.723 ** | 0.605 * | 0.735 |
Statistical Variables | Attributes | Number of People (N) | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 1322 | 38.67% |
Female | 2097 | 61.33% | |
Grade | First year of junior school | 611 | 17.87% |
Second year of junior school | 235 | 6.87% | |
Third year of junior school | 1090 | 31.88% | |
First year of high school | 1114 | 32.58% | |
Second year of high school | 369 | 10.79% | |
Family financial situation | Very well-off | 10 | 0.29% |
More well-off | 27 | 0.79% | |
Average | 2256 | 65.98% | |
Difficult | 945 | 27.64% | |
Very difficult | 181 | 5.30% |
Path Relationship | Path Coefficient | Standard Error | p-Value | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Motivation to Participate | → | Perceived Usefulness | −0.114 | 0.212 | 0.071 | Failure to pass |
Motivation to Participate | → | Perceived Ease of Use | 0.764 | 0.016 | *** | Pass |
Motivation to Participate | → | Perceived Riskiness | −0.05 | 0.01 | *** | Pass |
Motivation to Participate | → | Willingness to participate | 0.08 | 0.012 | *** | Pass |
Opportunity to Participate | → | Perceived Usefulness | 2.165 | 0.101 | *** | Pass |
Opportunity to Participate | → | Perceived Ease of Use | 0.221 | 0.101 | ** | Pass |
Opportunity to Participate | → | Perceived Riskiness | −2.016 | 0.086 | *** | Pass |
Opportunity to Participate | → | Willingness to participate | 0.075 | 0.208 | 0.109 | Failure to pass |
Ability to Participate | → | Perceived Usefulness | 0.992 | 0.084 | *** | Pass |
Ability to Participate | → | Perceived Ease of Use | 0.347 | 0.065 | *** | Pass |
Ability to Participate | → | Perceived Riskiness | −0.774 | 0.07 | *** | Pass |
Ability to Participate | → | Willingness to participate | 0.997 | 0.105 | *** | Pass |
Perceived Ease of Use | → | Perceived Usefulness | 0.044 | 0.008 | *** | Pass |
Perceived Ease of Use | → | Willingness to participate | 0.039 | 0.128 | 0.217 | Failure to pass |
Perceived Usefulness | → | Willingness to participate | 0.225 | 0.012 | *** | Pass |
Perceived Riskiness | → | Willingness to participate | −0.033 | 0.073 | *** | Pass |
Type of Effect | Path Relationship | Efficacy Value | LLCI | ULCI | p-Value | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total effect 1 | Motivation to Participate → Willingness to Participate | 0.830 | 0.232 | 0.934 | 0.000 | |
Direct effect 1 | Motivation to Participate → Willingness to Participate | 0.680 | 0.063 | 0.840 | 0.000 | 0.819 |
Indirect effect 1 | Motivation to Participate → Perceived Riskiness → Willingness to Participate | 0.150 | 0.085 | 0.215 | 0.000 | 0.181 |
Total effect 2 | Ability to Participate → Willingness to Participate | 0.921 | 0.893 | 1.179 | 0.000 | |
Direct effect 2 | Ability to Participate → Willingness to Participate | 0.840 | 0.909 | 1.184 | 0.000 | 0.912 |
Indirect effect 2 | Ability to Participate → Perceived Riskiness → Willingness to Participate | 0.081 | 0.004 | 0.178 | 0.000 | 0.088 |
Total effect 3 | Ability to Participate → Perceived Usefulness | 0.916 | 0.806 | 1.071 | 0.000 | |
Direct effect 3 | Ability to Participate → Perceived Usefulness | 0.880 | 0.778 | 1.010 | 0.000 | 0.961 |
Indirect effect 3 | Ability to Participate → Perceived Ease of Use → Perceived Usefulness | 0.036 | 0.024 | 0.054 | 0.000 | 0.039 |
Total effect 4 | Opportunity to Participate → Perceived Usefulness | 0.903 | 0.942 | 1.318 | 0.000 | |
Direct effect 4 | Opportunity to Participate → Perceived Usefulness | 0.901 | 0.813 | 1.086 | 0.000 | 0.997 |
Indirect effect 4 | Opportunity to Participate → Perceived Ease of Use → Perceived Usefulness | 0.002 | −0.024 | 0.009 | 0.258 | 0.003 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Liu, Z.; Wang, S.; Gu, Q. Study on the Mechanism of Influencing Adolescents’ Willingness to Participate in Ice Sports. Children 2023, 10, 1080. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10061080
Liu Z, Wang S, Gu Q. Study on the Mechanism of Influencing Adolescents’ Willingness to Participate in Ice Sports. Children. 2023; 10(6):1080. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10061080
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Zhuoling, Sai Wang, and Qian Gu. 2023. "Study on the Mechanism of Influencing Adolescents’ Willingness to Participate in Ice Sports" Children 10, no. 6: 1080. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10061080
APA StyleLiu, Z., Wang, S., & Gu, Q. (2023). Study on the Mechanism of Influencing Adolescents’ Willingness to Participate in Ice Sports. Children, 10(6), 1080. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10061080