Next Article in Journal
Assessing Parental Competence and Self-Ratings in Management of Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes and Emergency Glucagon Administration—An Exploratory Observational Study
Next Article in Special Issue
The Use of Eye-Tracking Technology in Pediatric Orofacial Clefts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Oral Glucose Tolerance Testing Using Candy: A Sweet Solution to Improve Screening in Children with Cystic Fibrosis?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Light-Curable Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Varnish on Non-Cavitated Proximal Caries Lesions in Primary Molars: A Randomized Controlled Trial
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Non-Destructive In Vitro Evaluation of an Internal Adaptation of Recent Pulp-Capping Materials in Permanent Teeth Using OCT and Micro-CT

by
Ahmed Y. Alzahrani
1,
Amani A. Al Tuwirqi
1,*,
Nada O. Bamashmous
1,
Turki A. Bakhsh
2 and
Eman A. El Ashiry
1
1
Pediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
2
Restorative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2023, 10(8), 1318; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10081318
Submission received: 5 June 2023 / Revised: 27 July 2023 / Accepted: 27 July 2023 / Published: 31 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Contemporary Issues in Pediatric Dentistry)

Abstract

:
The objective of this study was to assess and compare the internal adaptation of various pulp-capping materials, namely TheraCal, Biodentine, and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), on the dentin of permanent teeth through the utilization of micro-computed tomography (MCT) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Thirty permanent molars were divided into three groups using a random process: group A (TheraCal), group B (Biodentine), and group C (MTA, which served as the control group). On the buccal surface of each tooth, a class V cavity of a standardized cylindrical shape was prepared. Subsequently, the respective pulp-capping material was applied to the cavity based on the assigned group, followed by restoration with composite resin. Based on the MCT results, it was observed that group A had a considerably larger gap volume in comparison to groups B and C (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in gap volume between groups B and C. Regarding the OCT findings, group A displayed a substantially higher level of light reflection than groups B and C (p < 0.001). Group C exhibited a significantly lower level of light reflection in comparison to group B (p < 0.001). Biodentine and MTA revealed similar outcomes in terms of how well they adhered to the dentinal surface in permanent teeth. Both materials exhibited superior performance in comparison to TheraCal. The utilization of OCT in clinical practice could be advantageous as it enables dentists to monitor and evaluate restorations during post-treatment follow-up. It is imperative to intensify efforts aimed at making OCT equipment more accessible and applicable, overcoming its current limitations, and allowing for its widespread utilization in clinical practice.

1. Introduction

In the early 1990s, an innovative material called mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) was introduced for the first time as a root-filling material [1]. Nowadays, MTA belongs to a family of pulp-capping agents known as calcium silicate materials (CSMs) [2,3]. The term biocompatibility is often used to describe the capacity of a material to effectively function in a particular application while evoking an appropriate response from the host. This attribute is what makes CSMs highly promising [2,4,5,6]. CSMs have been found to possess high biocompatibility and the ability to induce the formation of dentin bridges. Moreover, they exhibit an outstanding regenerative response [2]. MTA is also able to promote mineralization and repair in the exposed pulp, preserving pulp vitality. Furthermore, MTA is a material that has been extensively researched and used for two decades and has established its biocompatibility and success [1,3,7]. When comparing calcium hydroxide with MTA, it was observed that MTA exhibits a superior response in terms of pulp healing [1]. Furthermore, the clinical trials conducted with MTA as pulp-capping medications demonstrated a high success rate during the follow-up period of up to 4 years [2,3].
Nevertheless, to address issues with extended setting time and high cost, newer modifications and types of MTA have been developed [2,8]. Products like Biodentine, TheraCal, and others have been widely utilized in clinical practice. Biodentine is a cement based on tricalcium silicate and has a setting time ranging from 9 to 12 min [9,10]. Biodentine can seal the margins of the cavity by creating tag-like structures with dentin bond strength similar to that of ProRoot MTA, due to its ability to penetrate the dentinal tubules. It was also found that Biodentine is suitable as a replacement for dentine in the sandwich technique and can be overlaid with a composite [11]. On the other hand, TheraCal is a calcium silicate-based material that is set by light curing and used for indirect and direct pulp-capping procedures. It can also facilitate the immediate application of the final restoration [12]. Yet, few studies have been conducted on Biodentine and TheraCal LC’s internal adaptation to the dentine of permanent teeth when utilized as an indirect pulp-capping material. Moreover, the findings have been inconsistent [9,13,14]. Additionally, a recent review concludes that these new materials require further investigation to better understand their cytotoxicity, bond strength, and dentin-bridge formation quality [15]. Table 1 illustrates some controversy in previous in vitro investigations that examined the efficacy of CSMs in sealing ability.
Conventional radiographs cannot detect the gaps in the internal margins [20]. However, recent innovations, such as micro-computed tomography (MCT) have been used to assess restorations’ internal margin adaptation [19,21]. The difference between it and conventional CT scanners is the voxel size. In CT the volume of the voxel is approximately 1 mm3, while in MCT the voxel size is about 5 to 50 µm, which means it is about one million times smaller [22]. This recent advancement in imaging technology offers the ability to achieve a three-dimensional qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the entire restorative interface in a short time and in more detail [5,6,23,24]. However, radiation hazards and the high cost of the X-ray machine are fundamental limitations [25].
Another recent imaging method is optical coherence tomography (OCT), which has multiple characteristics that make it very promising for various clinical applications [20]. This technique has many merits, including non-invasiveness, visibility of hard and soft tissues, and lack of radiation with excellent spatial resolution [26,27]. OCT allows for real-time imaging of tissue sections without the need for biopsy, histological procedures, or X-rays, in a non-contact and non-invasive manner [28,29,30,31]. The benefits mentioned have been verified in a prior investigation that established the capability of MCT and OCT to identify, without causing damage, the sealing ability of the pulp-capping agents in primary teeth. The examination demonstrated a notable and significant positive association between MCT and OCT [19,20]. However, no studies have compared MCT and OCT’s performance to detect the gap at the cavity floor in permanent teeth. Consequently, this research aims to tackle both concerns through the examination of two aspects: First, the study aims to evaluate the adaptation of recent pulp-capping materials to the dentin surface in permanent teeth; second, it aims to assess these materials using OCT and MCT for a comprehensive and precise evaluation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Approval and Sample Size

The protocol for this research obtained ethical approval from the Ethical Committee at the University Dental Hospital of King Abdulaziz University (KAU). The statistical power of the MCT and OCT findings was analyzed to determine the research power. The power of the study to correctly reject the null hypothesis was on the ideal level in both MCT and OCT findings.

2.2. Study Sample and Grouping

In total, 30 sound permanent molars were collected, which were freshly extracted for either periodontal or orthodontic reasons. These molars underwent thorough cleaning using ultrasonic scalers and were subsequently kept in distilled water. The molars were then randomly allocated into 3 groups (n = 10): group A: TheraCal (Bisco, Anaheim, CA, USA), group B: Biodentine (Septodont, Saint-Maur des-Fossés, France), and group C (the control group): MTA (Dentsply, Charlotte, NC, USA). The randomization process was conducted using SPSS v. 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) for Windows.

2.3. Preparation of Specimens

A skilled operator prepared a standardized cavity in the cervical region of each tooth, utilizing a milling machine equipped with a constant stream of water to cool the cavity during the process. To ensure optimal performance, the operator replaced each bur after completing 5 cavities. The prepared cavities had a depth of 2 mm and a width of 3 mm, with the cavity floor resting on dentine.

2.4. Preparation and Application of the Different Pulp-Capping Materials

In Group A, the material was administered into the cavity using a syringe tip and cured for 20 s using light in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines. In Groups B and C, the materials were mixed as per the manufacturer’s instructions, and the pulp-capping material was applied using an amalgam carrier with a small tip. Subsequently, condensation was conducted using an amalgam condenser. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, TheraCal sets shortly after light curing, specifically after 20 s.

2.5. Application of Restorative Materials

To perform the cavity restoration, the fifth-generation bonding material (Single Bond, Adper-3M-ESPE, USA). The composite restoration (Filtek-Z350-XT, 3M-ESPE, USA) was then applied in incremental layers using light-curing device (Elipar-Curing Light-2500, 3M-EPSE, USA). Following that, all restorations in the sample were cured utilizing the same light-curing device. To simulate natural oral conditions, the samples underwent 1000 cycles of thermocycling (5–55 °C) with a dwell time of 20 s using a thermocycling device (SD Mechatronic Machine, GmbH comp., Germany).

2.6. Evaluation by MCT (Scanning and Analysis)

The Skyscan Model 1172 device, produced in Kontich, Belgium, was utilized for MCT scanning in this study. To reconstruct the generated images, NRecon v. 1.6 software was used, which is specifically designed for this purpose. To ensure accurate and stable scanning, each specimen was carefully affixed to a specimen holder and secured with wax. This step was crucial to maintain stability throughout the MCT scanning process, minimizing any potential movement or distortion.
In this study, the measurements were conducted in mm3 for precise quantification of gap volume and total restorative volume. To delineate the specific region of interest, CT Analyzer software v. 1.11 was used. The region of interest was delineated between the dentine surface and the pulp-capping material. Subsequently, the specimens were further segmented into CT slices based on their grayscale values. This segmentation process enabled us to accurately determine the volumes of both the gap and the restoration. The volume of the gap was calculated by inverting the segmented image in the area of interest according to shade density. A one-click process was used to analyze the images obtained in the region of interest in the evaluation software.

2.7. Evaluation by OCT (Scanning and Analysis)

A portable cross-polarization OCT scanner (CP OCT, IVS 300, Japan) was utilized in this investigation. The system was connected to a handheld diode laser probe with a scanning rate of 30 kHz. The laser had a continuous wavelength of 1310 nm and a wavelength range of 100 nm. The device’s sensitivity is 95 dB, and the lateral and axial resolution were 30 and 12 μm, respectively. The energy output of the probe adhered to the safety guidelines established by the American National Standards Institute. The sample was secured in place on a micrometer stage, and then serial tomographic B-scans were taken to evaluate the gaps in each 250 μm [32]. The scans obtained from OCT were moved to an external drive and then re-evaluated by an additional personal computer with image analysis software (ImageJ v. 1.5m9, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The images obtained were then reconstructed in grayscale using a previously described protocol [32]. The floor of the cavity was determined, and then measured, and binary pictures of black and white pixels were obtained. The regions with increased backscattered reflections on a background of white were transformed into black pixels, which indicated the gaps. The percentage of gaps on the restoration’s floor was evaluated using the following equation:
G a p   p e r c e n t a g e = G a p   w i d t h W i d t h   o f   t h e   c a v i t y   f l o o r × 100

2.8. Statistical Methods

The data collected in this study were analyzed using SPSS version 20.0 for Windows. A significance level of p < 0.05 and a 95% confidence level were selected. To assess the normality of the data, the Shapiro–Wilk test was conducted. The test yielded a p-value of 0.48, indicating that the data followed a normal distribution. Based on this finding, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was chosen to compare the results of MCT and OCT.
In order to conduct a more thorough examination of the relation between the findings from MCT and OCT, a Pearson correlation test was employed. This test enabled the assessment of both the degree and direction of the correlation. To determine the extent and intensity of the correlation, the method proposed by Akoglu and Haldu in 2018 was implemented [33]. This method established a threshold of r = pm 0.7 to categorize correlations as strong to moderate, and r = pm 0.4 to classify correlations as moderate to weak.

3. Results

3.1. MCT Findings

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was utilized to evaluate the MCT findings. The examination of the total cavity volume revealed means of 10.875 ± 1.29, 10.888 ± 1.28, and 10.892 ± 1.27 for groups A, B, and C, respectively. However, none of these differences were deemed significant (p = 1). For the total gap volume, group A displayed a mean of 0.253 ± 0.03, group B had 0.035 ± 0.03, and group C had 0.027 ± 0.027. The differences observed between these groups, however, were found to be significant (p < 0.001). Similarly, concerning the mean ratio of the gap to total cavity volume, group A exhibited a mean ratio of 2.352 ± 0.388, group B had 0.317 ± 0.270, and group C displayed 0.253 ± 0.275. Again, the differences between these groups were noted as significant (p < 0.001).
To further investigate the differences between the groups, the LSD test was employed, and the results are presented in Table 1. Group A demonstrated significantly greater gap volume than both groups B and C (p < 0.001). On the other hand, no significant difference in total gap volume was observed between groups B and C (p = 0.59).
In terms of the mean ratio of gap to total restorative volume, group A exhibited a significantly higher gap volume compared to groups B and C (p < 0.001), while the total gap volume in groups B and C did not vary significantly (p = 0.66). Table 2 and Figure 1 provide a summary of the mean differences between groups.

3.2. OCT Findings

The scans of OCT were analyzed to assess the intensity of high reflection at the interface between pulp capping material and dentinal surface for each specimen. The one-way ANOVA test was used to test the findings form OCT in permanent teeth.
A summary of the results and mean differences between the groups is shown in Table 3, and the scans of OCT for the groups are shown in Figure 2. All groups showed some degree of loss of the interfacial seal in the form of bright pixels that presented as high-intensity reflection (HIR), while areas that did not show a loss of the interfacial seal presented as dark pixels.
The mean percentage of HIR on the floor in the groups differed significantly. That of group A was 86.54 ± SD = 1.97, that of group B was 82.06 ± SD = 2.19, and that of group C was 77.29 ± SD = 3.82 (p < 0.001). The LSD test was used to assess the differences between the three groups. Significantly higher HIR was observed in group A compared to all groups (p < 0.001), while group B had significantly higher HIR than group C (p < 0.001).

3.3. Comparative Analysis of Findings from MCT and OCT

There A strong positive correlation was observed between the abilities of MCT and OCT to assess the quality of adaptation in permanent teeth. This was confirmed by the significant Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.71, which also indicated that higher MCT values were associated with higher OCT values. A Pearson’s correlation test was conducted to establish the relationship between the findings from MCT and OCT, as shown in Figure 3. The test yielded a result of r = 0.706, n = 30, p < 0.001.

4. Discussion

Several techniques are used in dentistry to assess different types of restorative materials’ sealing ability and leakage resistance. These techniques include radioisotope tracers, bacterial leakage models, electrochemical methods, fluids infiltration, and penetration of the dye [34]. Unfortunately, these techniques require slicing to evaluate leakage and thus destroy the samples. Also, this method can be subjective since the dye can stain the adjacent sound dentine, leading to false positive findings [21,35,36]. Among the contemporary assessment methods are MCT and OCT, the advantages of these methods include the no destruction of the sample when evaluating the restorations’ internal adaptation [34]. Further, MCT and OCT can conveniently detect the microgaps and areas with defects in the restoration’s internal construction in two and three dimensions [36,37]. These are the primary reasons to implement the two imaging methods to assess pulp-capping agents’ internal adaptation.
The study maintained consistent methods for teeth, cavities, storage, and restoration. The operator used a milling machine to standardize the restorative procedure and prepare all the samples. This was reflected in the dimensions of the prepared cavities in the MCT assessment, which showed no dimensional discrepancies upon evaluating the restoration volume for all groups tested. Moreover, each pulp-capping material’s setting time was estimated after reviewing previous reports and the manufacturer’s recommendations (6). Then, the pulp-capping agents were covered with a cotton pellet to ensure that the materials were appropriately set by supplying optimal hydration for the setting reaction before the final restoration was applied. According to previous studies [9,38], the hydration reaction times required for MTA and Biodentine to set completely are 12 min and 4 h, respectively, while according to the manufacturer’s instructions, TheraCal sets immediately after light curing (20 s). Regarding the composite, the dental nanocomposite that was used in the current study has shown in previous research similar levels of translucency, polish, and polish retention as microfills, while also maintaining the same physical properties and wear resistance as several hybrid composites [39].
Based on the MCT and OCT findings in this work, comparable outcomes were observed between Biodentine and MTA in the sealing ability, although to some extent, MTA demonstrated better performance than Biodentine. This was consistent with other studies [13,14,40,41,42], which found that MTA and Biodentine showed similar adaptation. MTA is expected to exhibit excellent adaptation is likely attributable to its expansion over time while it sets, which may reduce the gap within the cavity [43]. Moreover, this material’s success may be attributable to its inherent ability to release calcium hydroxide and its ability to seal the dentine [44].
The findings pertaining to MTA and Biodentine yielded inconsistent results in comparison to other studies [16,45,46]. However, this discrepancy may be attributed to variations in the procedural testing of adaptation and sealing. Studies may have utilized a variety of techniques, such as utilizing these materials for the simulation of pulp exposure, for repairing perforations, or as an apical seal. Moreover, distinct setting environments may play a role in producing different results in terms of their effectiveness in establishing a seal.
The current study found that TheraCal had a higher internal gap at the dentinal surface compared to MTA and Biodentine. Nevertheless, a laboratory investigation utilizing laser confocal microscopy revealed that TheraCal demonstrated superior sealing performance compared to MTA and Biodentine, which contradicts the results of this study [18]. It has been documented that TheraCal should be applied directly on the dentine surface without any bonding adhesive and then cured according to the manufacturer’s instructions [47]. Adding 43% resin to the TheraCal without using any bonding adhesive may affect the material’s appropriate adaptation to the dentine surface. Earlier research has verified these findings, examining the bonding strength of this material to dentin surfaces both with and without the use of adhesive bonding. TheraCal’s shear bond strength increased significantly to 11.1 MPa with bonding adhesive and decreased to 0.8 MPa when the dental adhesive step was omitted [19,48]. Moreover, Camilleri et al. found that TheraCal LC did not hydrate completely because of improper diffusion of water derived from the pulp–dentine complex within this material [49]. Thus, it can be concluded that the resin composition and inadequate setting of this material may contribute to its poor adaptation [19,48,49].
Both OCT and MCT have distinct features for assessment. MCT can evaluate restorations without being limited by specific cavity depth. However, its use to assess dental restorations in humans is considered unethical and unjustified. On the contrary, OCT is not based on radiation, and in the future, OCT could be a potential substitute for dental X-ray images for clinical evaluation of the dental restorative materials’ performance hence avoiding the biological effects of the radiation. However, it has imaging depth limitations and cannot be used for deep cavities or bulky restorations [50].
The significant correlation between the results obtained from MCT and OCT is consistent with prior research investigations. It was proven through the Pearson correlation coefficients that high values in MCT correspond to high values in OCT [21,51,52]. However, it is important to note that both MCT and OCT have their characteristic features that make them valuable methods for evaluation. Both imaging systems can generate micron-resolution images. However, unlike OCT, MCT has no limitation in the cavity depth that can be evaluated, whereas OCT can reveal a clear image of the target area at the micron scale, unlike MCT. OCT cannot be used in deep cavities or bulky dental restorations as it has imaging depth limitations. Fortunately, this was not problematic in this study because of the utilization of a relatively shallow cavity (only 2 mm deep), while the acceptable depth for using OCT was reported to be 0.5–3 mm and varied according to the material’s index of refraction [50].
This study is acknowledged for being one of the limited investigations that concurrently analyze the sealing ability of three advanced calcium silicate-based pulp- capping materials as agents for indirect pulp- capping. Furthermore, this study establishes a correlation between OCT and MCT in evaluating the sealing ability of pulp-capping materials. Traditional evaluation methods, such as tooth sectioning, have unfortunately resulted in the destruction of specimens [25,53]. To overcome this limitation, non-destructive state-of-the-art assessment techniques, specifically MCT and OCT were used.
Dental research often requires extensive empirical studies involving numerous participants, which can be time-consuming, expensive, and ethically challenging. In silico simulation offers a promising alternative, allowing researchers to virtually conduct experiments and investigate the performance of new dental materials, devices, and procedures without physically subjecting patients to invasive interventions [54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63]. The current study has the potential to be conducted using an in silico approach. By allowing for virtual modeling and testing, in silico simulation enables dentists, researchers, and manufacturers to explore and optimize various dental interventions, techniques, and materials. Simulated computer models can assist in detecting subtle anomalies or irregularities that may otherwise be overlooked [54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63]. Furthermore, complex biological processes can be simulated and analyzed in a virtual environment, thus eliminating the necessity for time-consuming and costly laboratory-based experiments [54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61]. This method allows us to conduct large-scale simulations and data analysis, resulting in faster and more accurate results. Given the advancements in technology and the fast-paced nature of the scientific field, it is highly recommended to explore the use of in silico methods for similar research.
This study has some limitations. When interpreting these results, other factors not examined in the current study that could affect the success of any pulp-capping agent should be considered (e.g., bioactivity. Furthermore, the sample size of the study was small, which was attributed to the difficulty in obtaining intact molar teeth. Another limitation of this study is using a cavity on the buccal surface rather than the occlusal surface. Even with the reliability of the assessment methods used in this study to evaluate the pulp-capping agents’ adaptation, the results still need to be confirmed using conventional methods of assessment and clinical trials.

5. Conclusions and Recommendations

It can be concluded that Biodentine and MTA exhibited more promising outcomes in adaptation than TheraCal. OCT is a promising technology. However, it is imperative to intensify efforts aimed at making OCT equipment more accessible and applicable, overcoming its current limitations, and allowing for its widespread utilization in clinical practice. By ensuring affordability, addressing technological constraints, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, and providing comprehensive training, the integration of OCT technology in routine clinical settings can be significantly enhanced. This will subsequently lead to improved patient care, diagnostic accuracy, and treatment outcomes across a multitude of healthcare specializations.

Author Contributions

A.Y.A. was involved in sample preparation, data acquisition, analysis, interpretation, and manuscript writing. A.A.A.T., N.O.B., T.A.B. and E.A.E.A. participated in the conception, study design, data analysis, and interpretation of the study, and also contributed to drafting and critically revising the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah under grant no. (G–42–165–38).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the ethical committee under approval number 031–01–19, approval date 4 February 2019.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge with thanks the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah for the technical and financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Torabinejad, M.; Parirokh, M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: A comprehensive literature review—Part II: Leakage and biocompatibility investigations. J. Endod. 2010, 36, 190–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Aminozarbian, M.G.; Barati, M.; Salehi, I.; Mousavi, S.B. Biocompatibility of mineral trioxide aggregate and three new endodontic cements: An animal study. Dent. Res. J. 2012, 9, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cervino, G.; Laino, L.; D’Amico, C.; Russo, D.; Nucci, L.; Amoroso, G.; Gorassini, F.; Tepedino, M.; Terranova, A.; Gambino, D.; et al. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Applications in Endodontics: A Review. Eur. J. Dent. 2020, 14, 683–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ammarullah, M.I.; Afif, I.Y.; Maula, M.I.; Winarni, T.I.; Tauviqirrahman, M.; Akbar, I.; Basri, H.; van der Heide, E.; Jamari, J. Tresca Stress Simulation of Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty during Normal Walking Activity. Materials 2021, 14, 7554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ammarullah, M.I.; Santoso, G.; Sugiharto, S.; Supriyono, T.; Wibowo, D.B.; Kurdi, O.; Tauviqirrahman, M.; Jamari, J. Minimizing Risk of Failure from Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Prosthesis by Selecting Ceramic Materials Based on Tresca Stress. Sustainability 2022, 14, 13413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tauviqirrahman, M.; Ammarullah, M.I.; Jamari, J.; Saputra, E.; Winarni, T.I.; Kurniawan, F.D.; Shiddiq, S.A.; van der Heide, E. Analysis of contact pressure in a 3D model of dual-mobility hip joint prosthesis under a gait cycle. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 3564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kunert, M.; Lukomska-Szymanska, M. Bio-Inductive Materials in Direct and Indirect Pulp Capping—A Review Article. J. Mater. 2020, 13, 1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Cervino, G.; Fiorillo, L.; Spagnuolo, G.; Bramanti, E.; Laino, L.; Lauritano, F.; Cicciù, M. Interface Between MTA and Dental Bonding Agents: Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2017, 7, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kaur, M.; Singh, H.; Dhillon, J.S.; Batra, M.; Saini, M. MTA versus biodentine: Review of literature with a comparative analysis. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2017, 11, ZG01–ZG05. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kim, J.R.; Nosrat, A.; Fouad, A.F. Interfacial characteristics of Biodentine and MTA with dentine in simulated body fluid. J. Dent. 2015, 43, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Camilleri, J. Investigation of Biodentine as dentine replacement material. J. Dent. 2013, 41, 600–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gong, V.; França, R. Nanoscale chemical surface characterization of four different types of dental pulp-capping materials. J. Dent. 2017, 58, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mohan, T.M.; Sudha, K.; Shoba, C.; Sravanthi, T.; Yadav, B.S.; Rani, E.S. Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability of ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, and Bone Cement in the Repair of Furcation Perforation--An In Vitro Study. Indian J. Dent. Adv. 2018, 10, 176–181. [Google Scholar]
  14. Brenes-Valverde, K.; Conejo-Rodríguez, E.; Vega-Baudrit, J.R.; Montero-Aguilar, M.; Chavarría-Bolaños, D. Evaluation of Microleakage by Gas Permeability and Marginal Adaptation of MTA and Biodentine™ Apical Plugs: In Vitro Study. Odovtos Int. J. Dent. Sci. 2018, 20, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tucker, R.L.; Ha, W.N. A Systematic Review Comparing Mineral Trioxide Aggregate to Other Commercially Available Direct Pulp Capping Agents in Dogs. J. Vet. Dent. 2021, 38, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ravichandra, P.; Vemisetty, H.; Deepthi, K.; Jayaprada Reddy, S.; Ramkiran, D. Comparative evaluation of marginal adaptation of BiodentineTM and other commonly used root end filling materials-an invitro study. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2014, 8, 243. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sulaiman, J.; Yahya, M.M.; Al-Ashou, W.M. An in-vitro scan electron microscope comparative study of dentine-Biodentine interface. J. Baghdad Coll. Dent. 2014, 325, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Makkar, S.; Kaur, H.; Aggarwal, A.; Vashisht, R. A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopic Study Evaluating the Sealing Ability of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Biodentine and Anew Pulp Capping Agent-Theracal. Dent. J. Adv. Stud. 2015, 3, 020–025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Al Tuwirqi, A.; El Ashiry, E.; Alzahrani, A.; Bamashmous, N.; Bakhsh, T. Tomographic Evaluation of the Internal Adaptation for Recent Calcium Silicate-Based Pulp Capping Materials in Primary Teeth. Biomed Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 5523145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shimada, Y.; Sadr, A.; Sumi, Y.; Tagami, J. Application of optical coherence tomography (OCT) for diagnosis of caries, cracks, and defects of restorations. Curr. Oral Health Rep. 2015, 2, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Han, S.-H.; Sadr, A.; Tagami, J.; Park, S.-H. Non-destructive evaluation of an internal adaptation of resin composite restoration with swept-source optical coherence tomography and micro-CT. Dent. Mater. 2016, 32, e1–e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Feldkamp, L.A.; Goldstein, S.A.; Parfitt, M.A.; Jesion, G.; Kleerekoper, M. The direct examination of three-dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1989, 4, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Putra, R.U.; Basri, H.; Prakoso, A.T.; Chandra, H.; Ammarullah, M.I.; Akbar, I.; Syahrom, A.; Kamarul, T. Level of Activity Changes Increases the Fatigue Life of the Porous Magnesium Scaffold, as Observed in Dynamic Immersion Tests, over Time. Sustainability 2023, 15, 823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Prakoso, A.T.; Basri, H.; Adanta, D.; Yani, I.; Ammarullah, M.I.; Akbar, I.; Ghazali, F.A.; Syahrom, A.; Kamarul, T. The Effect of Tortuosity on Permeability of Porous Scaffold. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Rizzante, F.A.; Sedky, R.A.; Furuse, A.Y.; Teich, S.; Ishikiriama, S.K.; Mendonça, G. Validation of a method of quantifying 3D leakage in dental restorations. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2020, 123, 839–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Schneider, H.; Park, K.-J.; Häfer, M.; Rüger, C.; Schmalz, G.; Krause, F.; Schmidt, J.; Ziebolz, D.; Haak, R. Dental applications of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in cariology. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Schneider, H.; Park, K.-J.; Rueger, C.; Ziebolz, D.; Krause, F.; Haak, R. Imaging resin infiltration into non-cavitated carious lesions by optical coherence tomography. J. Dent. 2017, 60, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bakhsh, T.; Abuljadayel, J.; Alshouibi, E.; Abuljadayel, R. Advanced imaging of dentin microstructure. Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express. 2021, 7, 055018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bakhsh, T.A. Optical comparison between micro-CT and OCT in imaging of marginal composite adaptation: Observational study. J. Microsc. 2021, 282, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bakhsh, T.A.; Altouki, N.H.; Baeesa, L.S.; Baamer, R.A.; Alshebany, R.M.; Natto, Z.; Nasir, A.; Turkistani, A.; Hasanain, F.; Naguib, G.H. Effect of self-etch adhesives on the internal adaptation of composite restoration: A CP-OCT Study. Odontology 2019, 107, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bakhsh, T.; Turkistani, A. The Effect of Thermocycling on Interfacial Bonding Stability of Self-Etch Adhesives: OCT Study. Biomed Res. Int. 2021, 5578539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bakhsh, T.A.; Khan, S.; Gharamah, H.; Alshoaibi, E.; Turkistani, A. Nondestructive Evaluation of Microleakage in Restored Primary Teeth Using CP-OCT. Niger. J. Clin. Pract. 2021, 24, 919–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Akoglu, H. User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turk. J. Emerg. Med. 2018, 18, 91–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. AlHabdan, A.A. Review of microleakage evaluation tools. J. Int. Oral Health 2017, 9, 141. [Google Scholar]
  35. Jones, J.G.; Grieve, A.; Youngson, C. Marginal leakage associated with three posterior restorative materials. J. Dent. 1988, 16, 130–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. El Ashiry, E.A.; Alamoudi, N.M.; Farsi, N.M.; Al Tuwirqi, A.A.; Attar, M.H.; Alag, H.K.; Basalim, A.A.; Al Ashiry, M.K. The Use of Micro-Computed Tomography for Evaluation of Internal Adaptation of Dental Restorative Materials in Primary Molars: An In-Vitro Study. Int. J. Pharm. Res. Allied Sci. 2019, 8, 129–137. [Google Scholar]
  37. Han, S.-H.; Park, S.-H. Micro-CT evaluation of internal adaptation in resin fillings with different dentin adhesives. Restor. Dent. Endod. 2014, 39, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kaup, M.; Schäfer, E.; Dammaschke, T. An in vitro study of different material properties of Biodentine compared to ProRoot MTA. Head Face Med. 2015, 11, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Mitra, S.B.; Wu, D.; Holmes, B.N. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2003, 134, 1382–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ramazani, N.; Sadeghi, P. Bacterial leakage of mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium-enriched mixture and biodentine as furcation perforation repair materials in primary molars. Iran. Endod. J. 2016, 11, 214. [Google Scholar]
  41. Mousavi, S.A.; Khademi, A.; Soltani, P.; Shahnaseri, S.; Poorghorban, M. Comparison of sealing ability of ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate, biodentine, and ortho mineral trioxide aggregate for canal obturation by the fluid infiltration technique. J. Dent. Res. 2018, 15, 307. [Google Scholar]
  42. Juez, M.; Ballester, M.; Berástegui, E. In vitro comparison of apical microleakage by spectrophotometry in simulated apexification using White Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, TotalFill Bioceramic Root Repair material, and BioDentine. J. Conserv. Dent. 2019, 22, 237. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Kang, J.-Y.; Kim, J.-S.; Yoo, S.-H. Comparison of setting expansion and time of orthomta, proroot mta and Portland cement. J. Korean Acad. Pediatr. Dent. 2011, 38, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hilton, T.J. Keys to clinical success with pulp capping: A review of the literature. Oper. Dent. 2009, 34, 615–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Malhotra, S.; Hegde, M.N. Analysis of marginal seal of ProRoot MTA, MTA angelus biodentine, and glass ionomer cement as root-end filling materials: An in vitro study. J. Oral Res. Rev. 2015, 7, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Samuel, A.; Asokan, S.; Priya, P.G.; Thomas, S. Evaluation of sealing ability of Biodentine™ and mineral trioxide aggregate in primary molars using scanning electron microscope: A randomized controlled in vitro trial. Contemp. Clin. Dent. 2016, 7, 322. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Arandi, N.Z.; Rabi, T. TheraCal LC: From Biochemical and Bioactive Properties to Clinical Applications. Int. J. Dent. 2018, 2018, 3484653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kim, Y.K.; Hong, M.-H.; Kwon, T.-Y. Dentin Bonding of TheraCal LC Calcium Silicate Containing an Acidic Monomer: An In Vitro Study. J. Mater. 2020, 13, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Camilleri, J. Hydration characteristics of Biodentine and Theracal used as pulp capping materials. Dent. Mater. J. 2014, 30, 709–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shimada, Y.; Sadr, A.; Burrow, M.F.; Tagami, J.; Ozawa, N.; Sumi, Y. Validation of swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) for the diagnosis of occlusal caries. J. Dent. 2010, 38, 655–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Majkut, P.; Sadr, A.; Shimada, Y.; Sumi, Y.; Tagami, J. Validation of optical coherence tomography against micro–computed tomography for evaluation of remaining coronal dentin thickness. J. Endod. 2015, 41, 1349–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Nazari, A.; Sadr, A.; Saghiri, M.A.; Campillo-Funollet, M.; Hamba, H.; Shimada, Y.; Tagami, J.; Sumi, Y. Non-destructive characterization of voids in six flowable composites using swept-source optical coherence tomography. Dent. Mater. J. 2013, 29, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Carrera, C.A.; Lan, C.; Escobar-Sanabria, D.; Li, Y.; Rudney, J.; Aparicio, C.; Fok, A. The use of micro-CT with image segmentation to quantify leakage in dental restorations. Dent. Mater. 2015, 31, 382–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Ammarullah, M.I.; Hartono, R.; Supriyono, T.; Santoso, G.; Sugiharto, S.; Permana, M.S. Polycrystalline Diamond as a Potential Material for the Hard-on-Hard Bearing of Total Hip Prosthesis: Von Mises Stress Analysis. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ammarullah, M.I.; Santoso, G.; Sugiharto, S.; Supriyono, T.; Kurdi, O.; Tauviqirrahman, M.; Winarni, T.I.; Jamari, J. Tresca stress study of CoCrMo-on-CoCrMo bearings based on body mass index using 2D computational model. J. Tribol. 2022, 33, 31–38. [Google Scholar]
  56. Danny Pratama Lamura, M.; Imam Ammarullah, M.; Hidayat, T.; Izzur Maula, M.; Jamari, J.; Bayuseno, A.P. Diameter ratio and friction coefficient effect on equivalent plastic strain (PEEQ) during contact between two brass solids. Cogent Eng. 2023, 10, 2218691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Farooq, M.U.; Anwar, S.; Bhatti, H.A.; Kumar, M.S.; Ali, M.A.; Ammarullah, M.I. Electric Discharge Machining of Ti6Al4V ELI in Biomedical Industry: Parametric Analysis of Surface Functionalization and Tribological Characterization. Materials 2023, 16, 4458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jamari, J.; Ammarullah, M.I.; Saad, A.P.M.; Syahrom, A.; Uddin, M.; van der Heide, E.; Basri, H. The Effect of Bottom Profile Dimples on the Femoral Head on Wear in Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty. J. Funct. Biomater. 2021, 12, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jamari, J.; Ammarullah, M.I.; Santoso, G.; Sugiharto, S.; Supriyono, T.; Prakoso, A.T.; Basri, H.; van der Heide, E. Computational Contact Pressure Prediction of CoCrMo, SS 316L and Ti6Al4V Femoral Head against UHMWPE Acetabular Cup under Gait Cycle. J. Funct. Biomater. 2022, 13, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jamari, J.; Ammarullah, M.I.; Santoso, G.; Sugiharto, S.; Supriyono, T.; van der Heide, E. In Silico Contact Pressure of Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Implant with Different Materials Subjected to Gait Loading. Metals 2022, 12, 1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lamura, M.D.P.; Hidayat, T.; Ammarullah, M.I.; Bayuseno, A.P.; Jamari, J. Study of contact mechanics between two brass solids in various diameter ratios and friction coefficient. J. Tribol. 2023, 237, 1613–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. De Matos, J.D.M.; Queiroz, D.A.; Nakano, L.J.N.; Andrade, V.C.; de Carvalho Ramos Ribeiro, N.; Borges, A.L.S.; Bottino, M.A.; da Rocha Scalzer Lopes, G. Bioengineering Tools Applied to Dentistry: Validation Methods for In Vitro and In Silico Analysis. Dent. J. 2022, 10, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Salaha, Z.F.M.; Ammarullah, M.I.; Abdullah, N.N.A.A.; Aziz, A.U.A.; Gan, H.-S.; Abdullah, A.H.; Abdul Kadir, M.R.; Ramlee, M.H. Biomechanical Effects of the Porous Structure of Gyroid and Voronoi Hip Implants: A Finite Element Analysis Using an Experimentally Validated Model. Materials 2023, 16, 3298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The MCT images for all groups are as follows: (A) TheraCal, (B) Biodentine, and (C) MTA. The first column (A1-B1-C1) contains 2D cross-sectional views of the samples, while the second column (A2-B2-C2) displays the gap’s thickness within the region of interest, color-coded from blue (thinnest) to red (thickest). The third column (A3-B3-C3) shows the 3D renderings of the samples, including the filing and pulp-capping materials for each group.
Figure 1. The MCT images for all groups are as follows: (A) TheraCal, (B) Biodentine, and (C) MTA. The first column (A1-B1-C1) contains 2D cross-sectional views of the samples, while the second column (A2-B2-C2) displays the gap’s thickness within the region of interest, color-coded from blue (thinnest) to red (thickest). The third column (A3-B3-C3) shows the 3D renderings of the samples, including the filing and pulp-capping materials for each group.
Children 10 01318 g001
Figure 2. Representative images were taken for the tested groups, with TheraCal shown in (A), Biodentine shown in (B) and MTA shown in (C). Composite restorations and the interface between the pulp- capping material and the dentinal surface can be seen in each scan. The floor of the cavity with high light reflection is indicated by red arrows.
Figure 2. Representative images were taken for the tested groups, with TheraCal shown in (A), Biodentine shown in (B) and MTA shown in (C). Composite restorations and the interface between the pulp- capping material and the dentinal surface can be seen in each scan. The floor of the cavity with high light reflection is indicated by red arrows.
Children 10 01318 g002
Figure 3. As the scatter plots indicate, a significant positive correlation of r = 0.70 was observed between the MCT and OCT findings.
Figure 3. As the scatter plots indicate, a significant positive correlation of r = 0.70 was observed between the MCT and OCT findings.
Children 10 01318 g003
Table 1. Instances of previous in vitro investigations examining the efficacy of CSMs in sealing ability.
Table 1. Instances of previous in vitro investigations examining the efficacy of CSMs in sealing ability.
StudyMain FindingsRemarks
Ravichandra et al., (2014) [16]Biodentine showed superior adaptation when compared with MTA.Utilized as root filling materials.
Sulaiman et al., (2014) [17]Biodentine and MTA demonstrated comparable outcomes in terms of adaptation when used as restoration materials.The assessment was based on sectioning of the specimens and dye staining.
Makkar et al., (2015) [18]TheraCal exhibited superior sealing and reduced leakage compared to MTA and Biodentine. The assessment was based on one method (confocal laser microscopy).
Al Tuwirqi et al. (2021) [19]Biodentine and MTA exhibited comparable outcomes to the dentinal surface of primary teeth, outperforming TheraCal.Conducted in primary teeth.
Table 2. One-way ANOVA and LSD test for the MCT findings.
Table 2. One-way ANOVA and LSD test for the MCT findings.
Dependent VariablesGroupnMean (mm3)SDSEp ValueLSD
Groupp-Value
Total restorative volumeA1010.8751.2971.2971.00A–B1.00
B1010.8881.2831.283A–C1.00
C1010.8921.2791.279C–B1.00
Total gap volumeA100.2530.0390.039<0.001 *A–B<0.001 *
B100.0350.0310.031A–C<0.001 *
C100.0270.0270.027C–B0.592
Ratio of gap to total restorative volumeA102.3520.3880.388<0.001 *A–B<0.001 *
B100.3170.2700.270A–C<0.001 *
C100.2530.2750.275C–B0.655
*: Statistically Significant p < 0.05. A: TheraCal, B: Biodentine, and C: MTA. LSD: Least significant difference test.
Table 3. One-way ANOVA and LSD test for the OCT findings.
Table 3. One-way ANOVA and LSD test for the OCT findings.
GroupNMean PercentageSDSEp ValueLSD
Groupp Value
A1086.541.970.62<0.001 *A–B<0.001 *
B1082.062.190.69A–C<0.001 *
C1077.293.821.21B–C<0.001 *
*: Statistically significant p < 0.05. A: TheraCal, B: Biodentine, and C: MTA. LSD: Least significant difference test.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alzahrani, A.Y.; Al Tuwirqi, A.A.; Bamashmous, N.O.; Bakhsh, T.A.; El Ashiry, E.A. Non-Destructive In Vitro Evaluation of an Internal Adaptation of Recent Pulp-Capping Materials in Permanent Teeth Using OCT and Micro-CT. Children 2023, 10, 1318. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10081318

AMA Style

Alzahrani AY, Al Tuwirqi AA, Bamashmous NO, Bakhsh TA, El Ashiry EA. Non-Destructive In Vitro Evaluation of an Internal Adaptation of Recent Pulp-Capping Materials in Permanent Teeth Using OCT and Micro-CT. Children. 2023; 10(8):1318. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10081318

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alzahrani, Ahmed Y., Amani A. Al Tuwirqi, Nada O. Bamashmous, Turki A. Bakhsh, and Eman A. El Ashiry. 2023. "Non-Destructive In Vitro Evaluation of an Internal Adaptation of Recent Pulp-Capping Materials in Permanent Teeth Using OCT and Micro-CT" Children 10, no. 8: 1318. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10081318

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop