Next Article in Journal
Comment on Alfageme-Garcia et al. Respectful Children’s Shoes: A Systematic Review. Children 2024, 11, 761
Previous Article in Journal
Bacteriological Profile and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Neonatal Sepsis Cases in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Hospital in Türkiye
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Effectiveness of Respiratory Muscle Training in Pompe Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

1
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City 112201, Taiwan
2
School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City 11221, Taiwan
3
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, West Garden Hospital, Taipei City 108035, Taiwan
4
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Bei-Hu Branch, Taipei City 10845, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2024, 11(10), 1209; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11101209
Submission received: 29 August 2024 / Revised: 23 September 2024 / Accepted: 27 September 2024 / Published: 30 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine)

Abstract

Background: Pompe disease is a rare metabolic myopathy caused by the lack or deficiency of the lysosomal acid alpha-glucosidase, resulting in skeletal muscle weakness and cardiomyopathy. The disease varies by onset age and genetic mutations and is categorized into infantile-onset and late-onset Pompe disease. Respiratory muscle weakness may persist regardless enzyme replacement therapy. This systemic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the effect of respiratory muscle training (RMT) on respiratory muscle strength, functional endurance, and pulmonary function in patient with Pompe disease. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched up until Aug 2024. Studies examining the therapeutic effects of RMT in patients with Pompe disease were included. Outcome measures included the change in maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), six-minute walking test (6MWT), pulmonary function before after RMT, quality of life and adverse events. Results: The meta-analysis consisted of 5 single-arm studies, including 31 patients in total. Regarding inspiratory muscle strength, RMT has significantly improving MIP (8.71 cmH2O; 95% CI, 6.23–11.19, p < 0.001) and MEP (12.15 cmH2O; 95% CI, 10.55–13.74, p < 0.001) in both types of Pompe disease. However, no significant change regarding 6MWT. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis revealed that RMT may increase inspiratory muscle and expiratory muscle strength, but may not have an effect on 6MWT in patients with Pompe disease. RMT has potential to be integrated into the cardioplulmonary rehabilitation for patients with Pompe disease. Further large randomized controlled trials are needed to verify the efficacy and safety of RMT in patients with Pompe disease.
Keywords: Pompe disease; respiratory muscle training; systemic review; meta-analysis Pompe disease; respiratory muscle training; systemic review; meta-analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, M.-Y.; Chen, S.-H.; Lee, J.-T.; Hsu, P.-C. Effectiveness of Respiratory Muscle Training in Pompe Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Children 2024, 11, 1209. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11101209

AMA Style

Lin M-Y, Chen S-H, Lee J-T, Hsu P-C. Effectiveness of Respiratory Muscle Training in Pompe Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Children. 2024; 11(10):1209. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11101209

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Mu-Yun, Szu-Han Chen, Jen-Ting Lee, and Po-Cheng Hsu. 2024. "Effectiveness of Respiratory Muscle Training in Pompe Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" Children 11, no. 10: 1209. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11101209

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop