Next Article in Journal
Surface and Mineral Changes of Primary Enamel after Laser Diode Irradiation and Application of Remineralization Agents: A Comparative In Vitro Study
Previous Article in Journal
A Simple MRI Score Predicts Pathological General Movements in Very Preterm Infants with Brain Injury—Retrospective Cohort Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Online Age Verification: Government Legislation, Supplier Responsibilization, and Public Perceptions

by
Chelsea Jarvie
and
Karen Renaud
*,†
Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Children 2024, 11(9), 1068; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11091068
Submission received: 4 July 2024 / Revised: 23 July 2024 / Accepted: 22 August 2024 / Published: 30 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Global Pediatric Health)

Abstract

There are widespread concerns about the online harms to children operating online. As such, governments have enacted laws to require online service providers to deploy age verification to prevent such harms. We investigate the following three research questions regarding this topic: (1) To what extent have different governments legislated age verification controls? (2) Do governments embrace a responsibilization strategy when it comes to online age verification? and (3) How does the UK public feel about online age verification legislation? We find that governments are applying a responsibilization strategy, which has led to widespread deployment of privacy-invasive or ineffective age verification. The former violates the privacy of underage users, with the latter undermining the overarching aims of the legislation. We have also found general disengagement and a lack of trust in the government amongst the public with regards to new online age verification laws within the UK. To conclude, despite governments globally looking to put more robust online age verification mechanisms in place, there remains a general lack of privacy preservation and affordable technological solutions. Moreover, the overarching aims of the online safety and age verification legislative changes may not be satisfied due to the general public stakeholder group’s disengagement and lack of trust in their government.
Keywords: children; online harms; age verification; online service provider responsibilization children; online harms; age verification; online service provider responsibilization

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jarvie, C.; Renaud, K. Online Age Verification: Government Legislation, Supplier Responsibilization, and Public Perceptions. Children 2024, 11, 1068. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11091068

AMA Style

Jarvie C, Renaud K. Online Age Verification: Government Legislation, Supplier Responsibilization, and Public Perceptions. Children. 2024; 11(9):1068. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11091068

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jarvie, Chelsea, and Karen Renaud. 2024. "Online Age Verification: Government Legislation, Supplier Responsibilization, and Public Perceptions" Children 11, no. 9: 1068. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11091068

APA Style

Jarvie, C., & Renaud, K. (2024). Online Age Verification: Government Legislation, Supplier Responsibilization, and Public Perceptions. Children, 11(9), 1068. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11091068

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop