Next Article in Journal
The Role of Human Milk Immunomodulators in Protecting Against Viral Bronchiolitis and Development of Chronic Wheezing Illness
Next Article in Special Issue
The Undiagnosed Diseases Program Integrated Collaboration System (UDPICS): One Program’s Experience Developing Custom Software to Support Research for Complex-Disease Families
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Influence of Food on Paediatric Gastrointestinal Drug Absorption Following Oral Administration: A Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Children
Volume 2
Issue 2
10.3390/children2020272
children-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Challenges in Treating Low Blood Pressure in Preterm Infants

by
Eugene M. Dempsey
1,2,3
1
Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University College Cork, Cork City post code, Ireland
2
Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT), Cork, Ireland
3
Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Wilton Cork, Ireland
Children 2015, 2(2), 272-288; https://doi.org/10.3390/children2020272
Submission received: 10 April 2015 / Accepted: 5 June 2015 / Published: 15 June 2015
(This article belongs to the Collection Development of Medicines for Paediatric and Rare Diseases)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Whilst the prevalence of low blood pressure in preterm infants seems to have fallen over the last number of years, the problem is still frequently encountered in the neonatal intensive care unit and many babies continue to receive intervention. Great variability in practice persists, with a significant number of extremely low gestational age newborns in some institutions receiving some form of intervention, and in other units substantially less. A great degree of this variability relates to the actual criteria used to define hypotension, with some using blood pressure values alone to direct therapy and others using a combination of clinical, biochemical and echocardiography findings. The choice of intervention remains unresolved with the majority of centres continuing to administer volume followed by dopamine as a first line inotrope/vasopressor agent. Despite over 40 years of use there is little evidence that dopamine is of benefit both in the short term and long-term. Long-term follow up is available in only two randomised trials, which included a total of 99 babies. An under recognized problem relates to the administration of inotrope infusions in very preterm infants. There are no pediatric specific inotrope formulations available and so risks of errors in preparation and administration remain. This manuscript outlines these challenges and proposes some potential solutions.

1. Introduction

The decision to intervene in preterm infants with low blood pressure remains unresolved and as a result significant variability in practice remains [1,2]. The recent ELGAN study reported significant variation across 14 centres in the United States. In one centre almost all (98%) ELGANS admitted to the intensive care unit received volume, and in the same centre over 64% of all ELGANs received inotrope therapy. This compares to less than 30% receiving volume and 6% receiving an inotrope in another centre [3]. Undoubtedly case mix will account for some of this variability, but it is difficult to see how this can account for such wide variation (64% vs. 6%). Differing practices must account for a large proportion of this variability. A recent survey highlighted the lack of protocols in many institutions [4]. The most consistent finding of the ELGAN study is that in the majority of circumstances intervention commenced on the first day of life (90%, 89%, 91%, and 89% of infants born at 23 to 24 weeks, 25 weeks, 26 weeks, and 27 weeks of gestation). This is a time period where notable cardiorespiratory changes occur. Treating physiological adaptation may not be the best course of action.
A consistent finding from many surveys of practice is that in the majority of cases intervention is driven by blood pressure values [2,4,5,6,7]. A Canadian survey of over 120 neonatologists identified the BAPM guideline of a mean blood pressure less than gestational age as the commonest criterion used for intervention by over 87% of respondents [7]. Seghal and colleagues in a similar study conducted in Australia and New Zeeland found that a mean blood pressure was the single most important criteria used to determine intervention [5]. The most recent survey, conducted by the HIP consortium, identified that the BAPM rule was used by 75% of respondents to define a low blood pressure that may warrant intervention [4]. This is an important finding and shows that very little has changed in practice over the last 10 years. The HIP survey is important as it was a multinational survey with over 200 neonatologists responding. The fact that blood pressure values are used to guide intervention should not come as a surprise to many. Invasive blood pressure values are, generally speaking, easy to obtain at the bedside. They are objective, provide a continuous bedside value to the clinician, and the effects of intervention can be easily monitored. Low blood pressure values have been associated with adverse long-term neurodevelopmental outcome [8]. However, there are two key concerns that need to be highlighted: (1) The relationship between flow and blood pressure is poorly correlated; and (2) The relationship between low blood pressure and adverse long-term neurodevelopmental outcome remains to be determined.

2. Blood Pressure and Flow

“It is a source of regret that measurement of flow is much more difficult than measurement of pressure. This has led to an undue interest in blood pressure measurements.” This statement by Austrian physician Adolf Jarisch Jr, almost 100 years ago, still holds true today for the clinician at the bedside. Historically, for reasons mentioned above, clinicians have continued to be guided by blood pressure values. However, the relationship between flow and pressure is complex, especially when one factors in the dynamic changes that are taking place during the first 24 hours of life. A number of authors have highlighted the poor relationship between flow and blood pressure in preterm infants in the first few days of life [9,10,11,12,13]. There is consistently a poor relationship between measurements of superior vena cava flow and mean arterial blood pressure, and also a poor relationship between right and left ventricular output and mean arterial blood pressure. This should not be surprising as blood flow is dependent on two key factors, blood pressure and vascular resistance (Cardiac output = Blood pressure/systemic vascular resistance). If the mean arterial blood pressure is low but the vascular resistance is low, then flow can be normal or even high. Likewise the mean arterial blood pressure may be normal but if the vascular resistance is high then the blood flow may be suboptimal. Therefore, normal pressure should not assume normal flow. Echocardiography measurements of output can be challenging to obtain especially in small critically ill newborns. These measurements are not continuous, are prone to inter and intra-rater variability [14,15], and require a degree of handling if one is to perform repeated measurements [16]. Other methods of non-invasive assessment of flow are essential to guide therapy and these will be discussed later.

3. Low Blood Pressure and Adverse Outcome

Numerous studies have highlighted an adverse relationship between low blood pressure and adverse outcome. We explored this relationship previously and highlighted some of the concerns around this relationship [17]. We identified 18 studies including cohort studies and case controlled studies with small numbers of patients and none of which were powered for long-term neurodevelopmental follow up. The overall assessment of the data was that there is some association between having a lower blood pressure and having a worse outcome but that there were several potential confounding factors that precluded one from drawing any strong inference from this association. The definition of hypotension varied substantially across the studies. An often used definition is a single mean blood pressure value less than 30 mmHg. This is an unsound definition of hypotension and may result in an artifactual association between hypotension and adverse outcome. The more immature babies, at greatest risk for IVH, are much more likely to be hypotensive if one used a cut off of 30 mmHg.
Other authors have also questioned the relationship between low blood pressure and adverse long term outcome. Logan and colleagues evaluated three indicators of hypotension: (1) lowest mean arterial pressure (MAP) in the lowest quartile for gestational age; (2) treatment with a vasopressor; and (3) blood pressure lability, defined as the upper quartile of the difference between each infant’s lowest and highest MAP. They found no association between any of these definitions and adverse outcome defined as white matter abnormality on cranial ultrasound or a diagnosis of CP at 24 months [18]. In a similar study, they found little evidence that the early postnatal hypotension indicators, as defined above, were associated with developmental delay at 24 months corrected gestational age [19]. Van Bel and colleagues found that a MABP less than GA (in weeks) was not associated with lower cerebral oxygenation values (rScO2) or with lower neurodevelopmental outcome scores. Instead, they found that low rScO2 was associated with lower neurodevelopmental outcome scores. This study highlights end organ assessment, namely cerebral oxygenation, as a potential marker of long term neurodisability. The authors concluded by suggesting that preterm neonates could benefit from the inclusion of NIRS in (hypotension) treatment protocols [20].
Others have suggested that it is the treatment that may be a factor in adverse outcome [21,22,23,24]. Fanaroff found an association between treated hypotension and adverse outcome defined as delayed motor development, hearing loss, and death [21]. Limperopoulos found an association between volume expansion on the second day of life and abnormal cranial ultrasound finings [23]. Data from the Canadian Neonatal Network (CNN) showed that infants with hypotension defined as a lowest blood pressure less than their gestational age, or a blood pressure less than the tenth percentile using Watkins’ criteria, were statistically more likely to have severe IVH. However, this was no longer apparent when the use of blood pressure agents were included [24]. A relatively important and interesting finding was that patients who were normotensive yet treated had a worse outcome than infants who were hypotensive and not treated. Rather than assigning blame to inotrope administration, it is feasible that clinicians recognized other important variables that directed treatment and so a more global approach rather than just blood pressure values were included in the decision to treat. However, it is not feasible to answer this question retrospectively, but it does call into question the overall approach to treatment in this population of infants. Future clinical trials, adequately powered to address long-term outcome, are now required.

4. Assessment of Circulatory Well-Being

Circulatory well-being is generally assessed clinically at the bedside [13]. However, this assessment can be quite subjective and as a result can lead to significant variation in assessment. De Backer et al recently described three clinical windows at the bedside in the overall assessment of circulatory shock, namely the skin, kidney and brain [25]. Clinicians often describe the infant as being pink, well perfused, having adequate urine output and good overall level of activity. We previously described a cohort of infants who had low blood pressure, clinically appeared well and who had a good short term clinical outcome: referred to as permissive hypotension [26]. However, the lack of objective criteria to evaluate circulatory wellbeing persists. A recent European survey highlighted that these clinical parameters were included, but also biochemical parameters such as lactate, pH, base deficit, and haemoglobin values [4]. Each of the parameters in isolation have a low sensitivity for detecting low flow states, but when combined provide a better global assessment of circulatory well-being [13,26,27]. DeBoode provides an excellent overview of noninvasive assessment of circulatory well-being and highlights the importance of global assessment [28]. Other ancillary investigations are now growing in popularity, including the use of functional echocardiography [29,30,31], near infrared spectroscopy [32,33,34] and other methods of noninvasive continuous assessments such as perfusion index measurements [35] and noninvasive cardiac output measurements [36,37,38].

5. Prevention

Optimising transition: A great deal of interest and a number of clinical trials have reported the effects of placental transfusion on outcome in preterm infants.
A recent systematic review by Rabe et al. [39] found a lower mean blood pressure and a greater need for inotrope support in the group who received immediate cord clamping (ICC) compared with those who had delayed cord clamping (DCC). No measures of cardiac output were evaluated in this review. However Somers, in a nested cohort study of 51 preterm infants, found no differences between groups in heart rate and mean blood pressure, but did find a difference in svc flow measurements over the first four days of life [40]. Oh also found no difference in the hourly mean arterial blood pressure during the first 12 h of life [41]. A recent meta-analysis identified two studies that reported on blood pressure data following umbilical cord milking (UCM) [42]. Systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure were all significantly higher in the group who had umbilical cord milking performed. However, there was significant heterogeneity in the studies and as mentioned previously, no consensus on what constitutes UCM. Finer found similar mean blood pressure values between a group who received UCM versus ICC [43]. Whilst there was no difference in blood pressure values, there was a significant difference in SVC over the first 24 h. However, this did not translate into a difference in the need for volume, pressor, or hydrocortisone therapy. A recent meta-analysis of UCM found that whilst UCM was associated with some benefits and no adverse effects in the immediate postnatal period in preterm infants, further studies were warranted to assess the effect of UCM on short-term and long-term outcomes [44]. Some recent work involving animals has provided evidence of the importance of appropriate ventilation at the time of DCC. In preterm lambs with delaying cord clamping for 3–4 min until after ventilation is established improves cardiovascular function [45]. However, the results of the Australian Placental Transfusion Study Echo Sub-Study [46] found no difference in the incidence of low blood pressure (gestational age based rule for 15 min) between both groups and also no difference in the use of inotropes between both groups.
Optimising Respiratory Support: A recent review article by Polgaise and colleagues highlights the complex cardiorespiratory changes that occur over the first few minutes of life as newborns adapt to extrauterine existence, [47] and the potential influence of manual ventilation strategies on this adaptive process. This does raise concerns regarding the current sustained inflation strategies being studied. Kluckow previously highlighted the effects of an alteration of PEEP from 5–8 in ventilated preterms and showed a significant reduction in right ventricular output [48]. Ventilation strategies that aim to avoid mechanical ventilation seem to have a lower incidence of low blood pressure and low flow states [49]. De Waal and colleagues describe haemodynamic variables in infants who have had the INSURE procedure and describe an incidence of hypotension of 16% and rates of intervention at 10%. Similar data is presented for The Avoidance of Mechanical ventilation trial [50] where rates of 17%–18% of patients had low blood pressure. Therefore, although the evidence is primarily from cohort studies it would appear that mechanical ventilation can have an adverse effect on cardiovascular status and should be a recognized cause of low blood pressure/low flow in preterm infants. In the Neopain Trial in which almost 900 ventilated preterm infants were randomised to morphine or placebo, hypotension was associated with the use of morphine [51]. Therefore, strategies to minimize mechanical ventilation should form a critical part of the management of any preterm infant with low blood pressure.

6. Therapeutic Interventions

Algorithms outlining the treatment of low blood pressure and surveys of practice are characterized by a very similar approach, volume administration initially followed by dopamine. However, there is little evidence to support this approach.

6.1. Volume

Volume administration, typically 10 mls/kg of normal saline, is the initial intervention by most clinicians to hypotension in the preterm infant [7]. However, the majority of preterm infants with hypotension in the first few days of life are not hypovolaemic and have normal circulating blood volumes. This approach may be unwarranted and potentially detrimental. The relative lack of response to volume administration is further evidence that hypotensive preterm infants are not hypovolemic. There are a few circumstances where volume support is crucial, such as in sepsis, but the incidence of early onset sepsis is low and accounts for only a small percentage of hypotensive preterm infants in the first few days of life. Volume administration may seem relatively innocuous but increased fluid administration during the first few days of life is associated with adverse outcome including an increased prevalence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and an increase in the incidence of IVH in preterm infants receiving rapid volume expansion [52,53,54]. Adverse neurologic outcome has been documented in VLBW infants who had received colloid boluses. Therefore the routine use of volume in transitional low blood pressure remains a practice without any supporting evidence and judicious use of volume should be the norm [55,56,57].

6.2. Catecholamines

One way to assess the efficacy of catecholamines is to assess these agents based on the goals of one’s intervention or so called “goal directed therapy”. For example when a clinician decides to start an inotrope is the aim to increase the blood pressure, or is it to improve end organ blood flow, thus preventing brain injury and improving long-term outcome? These can be thought of as immediate, short term, and long term outcomes of the intervention. The primary aim at present is increasing blood pressure, for all the reasons stated previously. Dopamine is the commonest inotrope used in this population of infants and has been in use in the newborn infant for approximately 40 years. However, there are no studies comparing dopamine versus placebo in patients with low blood pressure or low flow states. There are a number of studies of dopamine versus placebo but these are in infants who are not hypotensive [58,59,60]. There are now 11 randomised trials of dopamine versus another inotrope in patients with hypotension or low flow states; dobutamine, eight trials [61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68], epinephrine two trials [69,70] and most recently vasopressin, in one trial [71]. All of these trials are characterized by variability; in patient populations, in patient numbers, definitions of hypotension, different inclusion criteria and different outcome measures (See Table 1 and Table 2). Dopamine reliably increases blood pressure but seems to do so largely by increasing vascular resistance, which may subsequently lead to a decrease in systemic perfusion [65,72]. The only certainty is that dopamine is more effective than dobutamine at increasing blood pressure and is characterized by less treatment failure, less cumulative dose, and a faster attainment of blood pressure [73]. Despite this it is unclear if it has any other short term benefits and certainly there is no evidence that dopamine has any long-term benefits. It is associated with a reduction in T4 and TSH levels, which although reversible on cessation of therapy, [66] may potentially have adverse long-term effects. Dobutamine does not reliably increase blood pressure but usually is associated with an increase in left ventricular output and SVC flow [65]. There is little long-term data on dobutamine use to make any meaningful comment [74]. Epinephrine is as effective as dopamine at increasing blood pressure and is associated with an improvement in left and right ventricular output [69], but again there is little evidence of any benefit in meaningful short-term outcomes and no evidence of any benefit in the long-term [75].
Table
Table 1. Dopamine versus Dobutamine in preterm infants with cardiovascular instability.
Table 1. Dopamine versus Dobutamine in preterm infants with cardiovascular instability.
AuthorNumber of PatientsGestation/WtDefinition
Roze20<32 weeks>30 mmHg
Klarr63<34 weeks>30 mmHg
Greenough40<33 weeksSystolic < 40 mmHg
Hentschel2025–36 weeksNot stated
Chatterjee20<32 weeksNot stated
Ruelas-orozco631.0–1.5 Kg<30 mmHg
Fillipi35<0.75, <1.0, <1.5 Kg<25, <30, <32 mmHg
Osborn40<30 weeksLow flow
Table
Table 2. Cardiac output meaurements in patients treated for cardiovascular instability.
Table 2. Cardiac output meaurements in patients treated for cardiovascular instability.
StudyNo.GestationAgentsRVOLVOSVCOutcome
Roze20<32 weeksDop DobnynDop: Reduction
Chatterjee20<32 weeksDop DobyynNo change
Phillipos20>1750 gDop EpiyynDop: Reduction
Osborn40<30 weeksDop DobynyDop: Reduction
Lundstrum36<33 weeksDop VolnynDop: Increase
Paradisis90<30 weeksMil PlaynyNo change
Dop: Dopamine; Dob: Dobutamine; Epi: Epinephrine; Mil: Milrinone; Vol: Volume; Pla: Placebo.

6.3. Milrinone

Milrinone, a phosphodiesterase inhibitor is commonly used in pediatric intensive care units, typically following cardiac surgery. It improves contractility and reduces pulmonary vascular resistance. However, due to changes in developmental regulation of PDE subtypes after delivery, milrinone might not be an effective inotrope in the immediate transitional period [76]. There are now a number of case reports and series of its use in term newborns with pulmonary hypertension [77,78,79,80]. Typically milrinone requires a loading dose followed by a maintenance infusion. The loading dose is often associated with a lowering of mean blood pressure and this may be one reason why it has not grown in popularity in preterm infants. There is one randomized trial of its use in preterm infants who are at risk of low flow states in the first few days of life [81]. This two centre study enrolled preterm infants less than 30 weeks gestation within the first six hours of life who were deemed to be at risk of developing a low flow state (all infants less than 28 weeks and additional criteria for those above 28 weeks). No significant difference was observed in SVC flow, right ventricular output, and blood pressure during the first 24 hours of life; or instances of Grades 3 to 4 periventricular/intraventricular hemorrhage or death. Constriction of the ductus was slower in the infants randomized to milrinone. No further randomized trials have been performed using milrinone in the first few days of life. There is a case series describing its use in preterm infants following patent ductus arteriosus ligation and it may be a useful therapy for post ligation cardiovascular instability [82]. There is also a case series addressing it’s potential use in preterm infants with pulmonary hypertension [83].

6.4. Corticosteroids

Corticosteroids do increase blood pressure in preterm infants. They are now more commonly prescribed for hypotension than for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in premature newborn infants [84]. There are a number of prospective randomised controlled trials addressing corticosteroid use for both the prevention (two trials) [85,86] and treatment (seven trials) of hypotension [87,88,89,90,91,92,93]. Prophylactic use of corticosteroids should be avoided. There are many uncertainties around corticosteroid use in preterm infants with hypotension. Clearly hydrocortisone has a limited role to play. However, the optimal dose and frequency of administration remains unclear. The current trials vary substantially in the dosing regimes with a fifteen fold difference in dose between some studies. Also, concerns around adverse short term and long term side effects are unresolved. If hydrocortisone is to be administered in the first few days of life then the lowest effective dose should be used, and a starting dose of hydrocortisone 1 mg/kg seems reasonable whilst further doses should be determined by the response. This is more a pragmatic approach as opposed to an evidence based approach. A recent randomized trial assessing the feasibility of conducting an RCT in hypotensive preterm infants had a very low overall recruitment rate, which may reflect clinicians concerns in relation to hydrocortisone use with indomethacin administration [94].

7. Administration Challenges

There are a number of important factors that need to be considered when delivering an inotrope infusion in very preterm infants, factors that are not as relevant in the paediatric/adult population. The first relates to the drug formulation; firstly there are no neonatal specific formulations, a finding that is consistent with the overall lack of newborn specific formulations [95], and secondly concerns related to drug formulations related to excipient use and their potential adverse effects [96,97].
Practical administration challenges relate to issues such as the total daily fluid volume administered in the preterm infant; it may be as low as 30–40 mls in total for a preterm infant weighing 500 grams. As a result every effort is made to ensure optimal administration of parenteral nutrition, and consequently additional infusions volumes need to be low, resulting in low infusion rates e.g., as low as 0.1 mL/h. This brings challenges in relation to optimal drug delivery time especially when taking into consideration dead space issues of the vascular catheter and the additional tubing that may be in place. There can be long lag times before the agent actually reaches the babies bloodstream, an infusion running at 0.1 mL/h may need 90 min to cover a dead space of 0.15 mls (start-up times). This phenomena is often under recognized and can result in both a delay in delivery and unpredictable effects.
There are a number of other important factors that need to be considered that can influence the delivery of an agent. It is best to think of these from the syringe driver through to the vascular access device. These include the vertical displacement of the syringe pump, the syringe itself, the tubing, the vascular access device being used and finally the concomitant infusions that may be running. Upward displacement results in a reduction in the internal pressure of the tubing and ultimately an increase in the flow rate, resulting in a bolus delivery. The lower the infusion rate, the greater the bolus delivery. Conversely, a downward displacement will result in an increase in the IP and a reduction in the flow rate. A number of studies on animals have highlighted these findings [98,99,100,101].
Studies on syringe size and design have shown that the time to reach steady-state flow, time to occlusion alarm, and the time without flow, increase with syringe size and lower preprogrammed flow rates. Increased syringe size will result in increased bolus volume caused by vertical displacement. The tubing compliance will also influence the time to occlusion alarm. A low compliance tubing will result in an earlier alarm than a high compliance tubing system. It is essential that clinicians are familiar with dead space volume issues of their own vascular device; either the umbilical venous catheter or PICC line. As is often the case in newborn care vascular access is limited and multiple infusions are often run in a single catheter. The carrier flow rate is important as low total flow results in a slower time to reach a steady state compared to high flow rates. Perhaps the most important aspect is that clinicians and healthcare professionals become educated in the concept of flow variability and the factors that may influence this variability. Efforts should be made to ensure low occlusion pressures are used, highest possible/practical flow rates are utilized, low compliant tubing and minimize vertical displacement of the syringe pump relative to the patient [101].

8. Prospective Trials

In the last few years a number of studies in the area of cardiovascular support in preterm infants have commenced. Two of these studies have ceased recruiting, namely the HIPHOP trial from Italy and the NICHD hypotension trial [94]. Both studies ended prematurely because of significant issues around patient recruitment. The NICHD trial enrolled in total 16 patients from an initial total of 120 eligible patients. A number of factors contributed to this low overall rate of enrolment, including consent issues and physician willingness to enroll. The factorial design meant that half of those enrolled would receive hydrocortisone, either alone or with dopamine. Many centres were using prophylactic indomethacin and hence the concern in relation to intestinal perforation meant physicians were less likely to approach and consent parents [94,102]. The HIPHOP trial (Eudract 2009 – 016653 – 17) has yet to report its results but again ceased early because of enrolment issues (personal correspondence from the lead clinician).
Whilst I have highlighted a number of the challenges in this area, it is encouraging to see a number of clinical trials ongoing. The European Commission has funded two of these studies in an attempt to determine the efficacy of dopamine and dobutamine in the management of cardiovascular compromise. The HIP trial (http://www.hip-trial.com) is now enrolling and is attempting to determine whether a standard approach to management of hypotension with volume and dopamine, versus a more observational approach with placebo (permissive approach), will result in improved short and long-term outcomes for preterm infants less than 28 weeks [103]. The Neocirculation group (http://neocirculation.eu/) will determine if dobutamine therapy results in an improvement in outcome in preterm infants with low flow as evidenced by low superior vena cava flow determined by echo. The TOHOP study is currently enrolling patients with low blood pressure and is attempting to evaluate the role of near infrared spectroscopy as an adjunct in the management of low blood pressure, focusing on an objective assessment of end organ blood flow. These studies will hopefully provide the clinician with evidence to direct therapy in preterm infants in the first few days of life.
A recent randomized trial utilising near infrared spectroscopy with an associated treatment algorithm in preterm infants less than 28 weeks is a novel approach to managing preterm infants in the first few days of life. Patients were randomized to either visible monitoring with the treatment algorithm, or standard care. If cerebral saturations were above 85% or less than 55% in the monitored group then a list of options were available to the clinician. This is a paradigm shift in newborn care, focusing on the end organ. The primary outcome was a reduction in the time spent “outside the normal range”. The monitored group spent a significantly shorter percentage of hours outside this range. Whilst there were no statistically significant differences in secondary endpoints, fewer patients died in the monitored group compared to the non-monitored (16% versus 25%), prompting the need for a much larger study.

9. Conclusions

Many preterm infants continue to receive treatment for low blood pressure. The main treatment criterion used is having a mean blood pressure less than gestational age, and the main treatment approach is volume administration followed by dopamine. The evidence is lacking for both the definition and this current management approach. This review article has highlighted that a number of key issues remain unresolved. What should direct intervention? Who should be treated? Does treatment improve long-term outcome? It is encouraging to see a number of clinical trials currently underway in an attempt to finally address these important issues. Whilst we will have to wait for a number of years until these trials are completed, the judicious use of inotropes in this population is warranted.

Funding Source

This research was funded by the European Commission within the 7th Framework Programme (EU FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 260777 (The HIP Trial) and a Science Foundation Research Centre Award (INFANT-12/RC/2272).

Conflicts of Interest

The author is the Chief Investigator for the HIP trial.

References

  1. Al-Aweel, I.; Pursley, D.M.; Rubin, L.P.; Shah, B.; Weisberger, S.; Richardson, D.K. Variations in prevalence of hypotension, hypertension, and vasopressor use in NICUs. J. Perinatol. 2001, 21, 272–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Batton, B.; Li, L.; Newman, N.S.; Das, A.; Watterberg, K.L.; Yoder, B.A.; Faix, R.G.; Laughon, M.M.; Stoll, B.J.; Van Meurs, K.P.; et al. Use of antihypotensive therapies in extremely preterm infants. Pediatrics 2013, 131, e1865–e1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Laughon, M.; Bose, C.; Allred, E.; O’Shea, T.M.; Van Marter, L.J.; Bednarek, F.; Leviton, A.; ELGAN Study Investigators. Factors associated with treatment for hypotension in extremely low gestational age newborns during the first postnatal week. Pediatrics 2007, 119, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Stranak, Z.; Semberova, J.; Barrington, K.; O’Donnell, C.; Marlow, N.; Naulaers, G.; Dempsey, E.; HIP consortium. International survey on diagnosis and management of hypotension in extremely preterm babies. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2014, 173, 793–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sehgal, A.; Osborn, D.; McNamara, P.J. Cardiovascular support in preterm infants: A survey of practices in Australia and New Zealand. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2012, 48, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bhojani, S.B.; Rahman, M. Management of neonatal hypotension—A national questionnaire survey. Infant 2010, 6, 152–154. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dempsey, E.M.; Barrington, K.J. Diagnostic criteria and therapeutic interventions for the hypotensive very low birth weight infant. J. Perinatol. 2006, 26, 677–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Batton, B.; Zhu, X.; Fanaroff, J.; Kirchner, H.L.; Berlin, S.; Wilson-Costello, D.; Walsh, M. Blood pressure, anti-hypotensive therapy, and neurodevelopment in extremely preterm infants. J. Pediatr. 2009, 154, 351–357.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Groves, A.M.; Kuschel, C.A.; Knight, D.B.; Skinner, J.R. Echocardiographic assessment of blood flow volume in the superior vena cava and descending aorta in the newborn infant. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008, 93, F24–F28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kluckow, M.; Evans, N. Relationship between blood pressure and cardiac output in preterm infants requiring mechanical ventilation. J. Pediatr. 1996, 129, 506–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pladys, P.; Wodey, E.; Beuchee, A.; Branger, B.; Betremieux, P. Left ventricle output and mean arterial blood pressure in preterm infants during the 1st day of life. Eur. J. Pediatr. 1999, 158, 817–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Shah, D.M.; Condo, M.; Bowen, J.; Kluckow, M. Blood pressure or blood flow: Which is important in the preterm infant? A case report of twins. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2012, 48, E144–E146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Miletin, J.; Pichova, K.; Dempsey, E.M. Bedside detection of low systemic flow in the very low birth weight infant on day 1 of life. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2009, 168, 809–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kluckow, M.; Evans, N. Superior vena cava flow in newborn infants: A novel marker of systemic blood flow. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000, 82, F182–F187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kluckow, M.; Seri, I.; Evans, N. Functional echocardiography: An emerging clinical tool for the neonatologist. J. Pediatr. 2007, 150, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Groves, A.M.; Kuschel, C.A.; Knight, D.B.; Skinner, J.R. Cardiorespiratory stability during echocardiography in preterm infants. Arch. Dis. Child. 2005, 90, 86–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dempsey, E.M.; Barrington, K.J. Treating hypotension in the preterm infant: When and with what: A critical and systematic review. J. Perinatol. 2007, 27, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Logan, J.W.; O’Shea, T.M.; Allred, E.N.; Laughon, M.M.; Bose, C.L.; Dammann, O.; Batton, D.G.; Kuban, K.C.; Paneth, N.; Leviton, A.; et al. Early postnatal hypotension is not associated with indicators of white matter damage or cerebral palsy in extremely low gestational age newborns. J. Perinatol. 2011, 31, 524–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Logan, J.W.; O’Shea, T.M.; Allred, E.N.; Laughon, M.M.; Bose, C.L.; Dammann, O.; Batton, D.G.; Engelke, S.C.; Leviton, A.; ELGAN Study Investigators. Early postnatal hypotension and developmental delay at 24 months of age among extremely low gestational age newborns. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011, 96, F321–F328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Alderliesten, T.; Lemmers, P.M.; van Haastert, I.C.; de Vries, L.S.; Bonestroo, H.J.; Baerts, W.; van Bel, F. Hypotension in preterm neonates: Low blood pressure alone does not affect neurodevelopmental outcome. J. Pediatr. 2014, 164, 986–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Fanaroff, J.M.; Wilson-Costello, D.E.; Newman, N.S.; Montpetite, M.M.; Fanaroff, A.A. Treated hypotension is associated with neonatal morbidity and hearing loss in extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2006, 117, 1131–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Fanaroff, A.A.; Fanaroff, J.M. Short- and long-term consequences of hypotension in ELBW infants. Semin. Perinatol. 2006, 30, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Limperopoulos, C.; Bassan, H.; Kalish, L.A.; Ringer, S.A.; Eichenwald, E.C.; Walter, G.; Moore, M.; Vanasse, M.; DiSalvo, D.N.; Soul, J.S.; et al. Current definitions of hypotension do not predict abnormal cranial ultrasound findings in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2007, 120, 966–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Barrington, K.J.; Stewart, S.; Lee, S.; the Canadian Neonatal Network. Differing blood pressure thresholds in preterm infants, effects on frequency of diagnosis of hypotension and intraventricular haemorrhage. Pediatr. Res. 2002, 51, 455A. [Google Scholar]
  25. Vincent, J.L.; De Backer, D. Circulatory shock. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 583. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Dempsey, E.M.; Al Hazzani, F.; Barrington, K.J. Permissive hypotension in the extremely low birthweight infant with signs of good perfusion. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009, 94, F241–F244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Osborn, D.A.; Evans, N.; Kluckow, M. Clinical detection of low upper body blood flow in very premature infants using blood pressure, capillary refill time, and central-peripheral temperature difference. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004, 89, F168–F173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. De Boode, W.P. Clinical monitoring of systemic hemodynamics in critically ill newborns. Early Hum. Dev. 2010, 86, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Jain, A.; Sahni, M.; El-Khuffash, A.; Khadawardi, E.; Sehgal, A.; McNamara, P.J. Use of Targeted Neonatal Echocardiography to Prevent Postoperative Cardiorespiratory Instability after Patent Ductus Arteriosus Ligation. J. Pediatr. 2012, 160, 584–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. De Waal, K.; Kluckow, M. Functional echocardiography; from physiology to treatment. Early Hum. Dev. 2010, 86, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Sehgal, A.; McNamara, P.J. Does point-of-care functional echocardiography enhance cardiovascular care in the NICU? J. Perinatol. 2008, 28, 729–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hyttel-Sorensen, S.; Austin, T.; van Bel, F.; Benders, M.; Claris, O.; Dempsey, E.; Fumagalli, M.; Greisen, G.; Grevstad, B.; Hagmann, C.; et al. A phase II randomized clinical trial on cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy plus a treatment guideline versus treatment as usual for extremely preterm infants during the first three days of life (SafeBoosC): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2013, 14, 120. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Bonestroo, H.J.; Lemmers, P.M.; Baerts, W.; van Bel, F. Effect of antihypotensive treatment on cerebral oxygenation of preterm infants without PDA. Pediatrics 2011, 128, e1502–e1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Van Bel, F.; Lemmers, P.; Naulaers, G. Monitoring neonatal regional cerebral oxygen saturation in clinical practice: Value and pitfalls. Neonatology 2008, 94, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Alderliesten, T.; Lemmers, P.M.; Baerts, W.; Groenendaal, F.; van Bel, F. Perfusion Index in Preterm Infants during the First 3 Days of Life: Reference Values and Relation with Clinical Variables. Neonatology 2015, 107, 258–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Weisz, D.E.; Jain, A.; Ting, J.; McNamara, P.J.; El-Khuffash, A. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in preterm infants undergoing patent ductus arteriosus ligation: A comparison with echocardiography. Neonatology 2014, 106, 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Song, R.; Rich, W.; Kim, J.H.; Finer, N.N.; Katheria, A.C. The use of electrical cardiometry for continuous cardiac output monitoring in preterm neonates: A validation study. Am. J. Perinatol. 2014, 31, 1105–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Blohm, M.; Obrecht, D.; Hartwich, J.; Mueller, G.; Kersten, J.; Weil, J.; Singer, D. Impedance cardiography (electrical velocimetry) and transthoracic echocardiography for non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in pediatric intensive care patients: A prospective single-center observational study. Crit. Care 2014, 18, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Rabe, H.; Diaz-Rossello, J.L.; Duley, L.; Dowswell, T. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental transfusion at preterm birth on maternal and infant outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012, 8, CD003248. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Sommers, R.; Stonestreet, B.S.; Oh, W.; Laptook, A.; Yanowitz, T.D.; Raker, C.; Mercer, J. Hemodynamic effects of delayed cord clamping in premature infants. Pediatrics 2012, 129, e667–e672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Oh, W.; Fanaroff, A.A.; Carlo, W.A.; Donovan, E.F.; McDonald, S.A.; Poole, W.K. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Effects of delayed cord clamping in very-low-birth-weight infants. J. Perinatol. 2011, 31 (Suppl. 1), S68–S71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ghavam, S.; Batra, D.; Mercer, J.; Kugelman, A.; Hosono, S.; Oh, W.; Rabe, H.; Kirpalani, H. Effects of placental transfusion in extremely low birthweight infants: Meta-analysis of long- and short-term outcomes. Transfusion 2014, 54, 1192–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Katheria, A.C.; Leone, T.A.; Woelkers, D.; Garey, D.M.; Rich, W.; Finer, N.N. The effects of umbilical cord milking on hemodynamics and neonatal outcomes in premature neonates. J. Pediatr. 2014, 164, 1045–1050.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Al-Wassia, H.; Shah, P.S. Efficacy and safety of umbilical cord milking at birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2015, 169, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bhatt, S.; Alison, B.; Wallace, E.M.; Crossley, K.J.; Gill, A.W.; Kluckow, M.; te Pas, A.B.; Morley, C.J.; Polglase, G.R.; Hooper, S.B. Delaying cord clamping until ventilation onset improves cardiovascular function at birth in preterm lambs. J. Physiol. 2013, 591, 2113–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Popat, H.M.K.; Buchan, J.; Brown, R.; Cornthwaite, K.; de Waal, K.; Evans, N.; Gill, A.; Hague, W.; Hecker, T.; Jeffery, M.; et al. Australian Placental Transfusion Study Echo Sub-Study: Effect on Systemic Blood Flow. EPAS 2015, 2765, 4. [Google Scholar]
  47. Polglase, G.R.; Miller, S.L.; Barton, S.K.; Kluckow, M.; Gill, A.W.; Hooper, S.B.; Tolcos, M. Respiratory support for premature neonates in the delivery room: Effects on cardiovascular function and the development of brain injury. Pediatr. Res. 2014, 75, 682–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. De Waal, K.A.; Evans, N.; Osborn, D.A.; Kluckow, M. Cardiorespiratory effects of changes in end expiratory pressure in ventilated newborns. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007, 92, 444–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Lakkundi, A.; Wright, I.; de Waal, K. Transitional hemodynamics in preterm infants with a respiratory management strategy directed at avoidance of mechanical ventilation. Early Hum. Dev. 2014, 90, 409–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Gopel, W.; Kribs, A.; Ziegler, A.; Laux, R.; Hoehn, T.; Wieg, C.; Siegel, J.; Avenarius, S.; von der Wense, A.; Vochem, M.; et al. Avoidance of mechanical ventilation by surfactant treatment of spontaneously breathing preterm infants (AMV): An open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 2011, 378, 1627–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hall, R.W.; Kronsberg, S.S.; Barton, B.A.; Kaiser, J.R.; Anand, K.J.; Group, N.T.I. Morphine, hypotension, and adverse outcomes among preterm neonates: Who’s to blame? Secondary results from the NEOPAIN trial. Pediatrics 2005, 115, 1351–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Goldberg, R.N.; Chung, D.; Goldman, S.L.; Bancalari, E. The association of rapid volume expansion and intraventricular hemorrhage in the preterm infant. J. Pediatr. 1980, 96, 1060–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Van Marter, L.J.; Leviton, A.; Allred, E.N.; Pagano, M.; Kuban, K.C. Hydration during the first days of life and the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in low birth weight infants. J. Pediatr. 1990, 116, 942–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tammela, O.K.; Lanning, F.P.; Koivisto, M.E. The relationship of fluid restriction during the 1st month of life to the occurrence and severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in low birth weight infants: A 1-year radiological follow up. Eur. J. Pediatr. 1992, 151, 367–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Evans, N. Volume expansion during neonatal intensive care: Do we know what we are doing? Semin. Neonatol. 2003, 8, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ewer, A.K.; Tyler, W.; Francis, A.; Drinkall, D.; Gardosi, J.O. Excessive volume expansion and neonatal death in preterm infants born at 27–28 weeks gestation. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2003, 17, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Hope, P. Pump up the volume? The routine early use of colloid in very preterm infants. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998, 78, F163–F165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Baenziger, O.; Waldvogel, K.; Ghelfi, D.; Arbenz, U.; Fanconi, S. Can dopamine prevent the renal side effects of indomethacin? A prospective randomized clinical study. Klin. Padiatr. 1999, 211, 438–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Liet, J.M.; Boscher, C.; Gras-Leguen, C.; Gournay, V.; Debillon, T.; Roze, J.C. Dopamine effects on pulmonary artery pressure in hypotensive preterm infants with patent ductus arteriosus. J. Pediatr. 2002, 140, 373–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Cuevas, L.; Yeh, T.F.; John, E.G.; Cuevas, D.; Plides, R.S. The effect of low-dose dopamine infusion on cardiopulmonary and renal status in premature newborns with respiratory distress syndrome. Am. J. Dis. Child. 1991, 145, 799–803. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  61. Greenough, A.; Emery, E.F. Randomized trial comparing dopamine and dobutamine in preterm infants. Eur. J. Pediatr. 1993, 152, 925–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Roze, J.C.; Tohier, C.; Maingueneau, C.; Lefevre, M.; Mouzard, A. Response to dobutamine and dopamine in the hypotensive very preterm infant. Arch. Dis. Child. 1993, 69, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Klarr, J.M.; Faix, R.G.; Pryce, C.J.; Bhatt-Mehta, V. Randomized, blind trial of dopamine versus dobutamine for treatment of hypotension in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. J. Pediatr. 1994, 125, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ruelas-Orozco, G.; Vargas-Origel, A. Assessment of therapy for arterial hypotension in critically ill preterm infants. Am. J. Perinatol. 2000, 17, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Osborn, D.; Evans, N.; Kluckow, M. Randomized trial of dobutamine versus dopamine in preterm infants with low systemic blood flow. J. Pediatr. 2002, 140, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Filippi, L.; Pezzati, M.; Poggi, C.; Rossi, S.; Cecchi, A.; Santoro, C. Dopamine versus dobutamine in very low birthweight infants: Endocrine effects. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007, 92, F367–F371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Hentschel, R.; Hensel, D.; Brune, T.; Rabe, H.; Jorch, G. Impact on blood pressure and intestinal perfusion of dobutamine or dopamine in hypotensive preterm infants. Biol. Neonate 1995, 68, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Chatterjee, A.B.M.; Leuschen, M.P.; et al. The pharmacodynamics of inotropic drugs in premature neonates. Pediatr. Res. 1993, 33, 206A. [Google Scholar]
  69. Pellicer, A.; Valverde, E.; Elorza, M.D.; Madero, R.; Gaya, F.; Quero, J.; Cabañas, F. Cardiovascular support for low birth weight infants and cerebral hemodynamics: A randomized, blinded, clinical trial. Pediatrics 2005, 115, 1501–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Phillipos, E.Z.; Barrington, K.J.; Robertson, M.A. Dopamine versus epinephrine for inotropic support in the neonate: A randomised blinded trial. Peditric Res. 1996, 39, A238. [Google Scholar]
  71. Rios, D.R.; Kaiser, J.R. Vasopressin versus Dopamine for Treatment of Hypotension in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants: A Randomized, Blinded Pilot Study. J. Pediatr. 2015, 166, 850–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Lundstrom, K.; Pryds, O.; Greisen, G. The haemodynamic effects of dopamine and volume expansion in sick preterm infants. Early Hum. Dev. 2000, 57, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Subhedar, N.V.; Shaw, N.J. Dopamine versus dobutamine for hypotensive preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2000, CD001242. [Google Scholar]
  74. Osborn, D.A.; Evans, N.; Kluckow, M.; Bowen, J.R.; Rieger, I. Low superior vena cava flow and effect of inotropes on neurodevelopment to 3 years in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2007, 120, 372–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Pellicer, A.; Bravo, M.C.; Madero, R.; Salas, S.; Quero, J.; Cabanas, F. Early systemic hypotension and vasopressor support in low birth weight infants: Impact on neurodevelopment. Pediatrics 2009, 123, 1369–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Artman, M.; Kithas, P.A.; Wike, J.S.; Strada, S.J. Inotropic responses change during postnatal maturation in rabbit. Am. J. Physiol. 1988, 255, H335–H342. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  77. Bassler, D.; Choong, K.; McNamara, P.; Kirpalani, H. Neonatal persistent pulmonary hypertension treated with milrinone: Four case reports. Biol. Neonate 2006, 89, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Bassler, D.; Kreutzer, K.; McNamara, P.; Kirpalani, H. Milrinone for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2010, CD007802. [Google Scholar]
  79. McNamara, P.J.; Laique, F.; Muang-In, S.; Whyte, H.E. Milrinone improves oxygenation in neonates with severe persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. J. Crit. Care 2006, 21, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. McNamara, P.J.; Shivananda, S.P.; Sahni, M.; Freeman, D.; Taddio, A. Pharmacology of milrinone in neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn and suboptimal response to inhaled nitric oxide. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 2013, 14, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Paradisis, M.; Evans, N.; Kluckow, M.; Osborn, D. Randomized trial of milrinone versus placebo for prevention of low systemic blood flow in very preterm infants. J. Pediatr. 2009, 154, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. El-Khuffash, A.F.; Jain, A.; Weisz, D.; Mertens, L.; McNamara, P.J. Assessment and treatment of post patent ductus arteriosus ligation syndrome. J. Pediatr. 2014, 165, 46–52.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. James, A.T.; Bee, C.; Corcoran, J.D.; McNamara, P.J.; Franklin, O.; El-Khuffash, A.F. Treatment of premature infants with pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular dysfunction with milrinone: A case series. J. Perinatol. 2015, 35, 268–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Finer, N.N.; Powers, R.J.; Ou, C.H.; Durand, D.; Wirtschafter, D.; Gould, J.B.; California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative Executive Committee. Prospective evaluation of postnatal steroid administration: A 1-year experience from the California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative. Pediatrics 2006, 117, 704–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Kopelman, A.E.; Moise, A.A.; Holbert, D.; Hegemier, S.E. A single very early dexamethasone dose improves respiratory and cardiovascular adaptation in preterm infants. J. Pediatr. 1999, 135, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Efird, M.M.; Heerens, A.T.; Gordon, P.V.; Bose, C.L.; Young, D.A. A randomized-controlled trial of prophylactic hydrocortisone supplementation for the prevention of hypotension in extremely low birth weight infants. J. Perinatol. 2005, 25, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Bourchier, D.; PJ, W. Randomised trial of dopamine compared with hydrocortisone for the treatment of hypotensive very low birthweight infants. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997, 76, F174–F178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Osiovich, H.P.E.; Lemke, P. A short course of hydrocortisone in Hypotensive neonates: A randomised double blind control trial. Pediatr. Res. 2000, 43, A422. [Google Scholar]
  89. Ng, P.C.; Lee, C.H.; Bnur, F.L.; Chan, I.H.; Lee, A.W.; Wong, E.; Chan, H.B.; Lam, C.W.; Lee, B.S.; Fok, T.F. A double-blind, randomized, controlled study of a “stress dose” of hydrocortisone for rescue treatment of refractory hypotension in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2006, 117, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Bonsante, F.; Latorre, G.; Iacobelli, S.; Forziati, V.; Laforgia, N.; Esposito, L.; Mautone, A. Early low-dose hydrocortisone in very preterm infants: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Neonatology 2007, 91, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Gaissmaier, R.E.; Pohlandt, F. Single-dose dexamethasone treatment of hypotension in preterm infants. J. Pediatr. 1999, 134, 701–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Hochwald, O.; Pelligra, G.; Osiovich, H. Adding hydrocortisone as 1st line of inotropic treatment for hypotension in very low birth weight infants: Authors’ reply. Indian J. Pediatr. 2014, 81, 988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Krediet, T.; van den ENT, K.; Rademaker, K. Rapid increase of blood pressure after low dose hydorcrtisone in low birth weight neonates with hypotension refractory to high doses of cardiac inotropes. Pediatr. Res. 1998, 38(210A). [Google Scholar]
  94. Batton, B.J.; Li, L.; Newman, N.S.; Das, A.; Watterberg, K.L.; Yoder, B.A.; Faix, R.G.; Laughon, M.M.; Van Meurs, K.P.; Carlo, W.A.; et al. Feasibility study of early blood pressure management in extremely preterm infants. J. Pediatr. 2012, 161, 65–69.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. O’Donnell, C.P.; Stone, R.J.; Morley, C.J. Unlicensed and off-label drug use in an Australian neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics 2002, 110, e52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Turner, M.A.; Duncan, J.C.; Shah, U.; Metsvaht, T.; Varendi, H.; Nellis, G.; Lutsar, I.; Yakkundi, S.; McElnay, J.C.; Pandya, H.; et al. Risk assessment of neonatal excipient exposure: Lessons from food safety and other areas. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2014, 73, 89–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Turner, M.A.; Duncan, J.; Shah, U.; Metsvaht, T.; Varendi, H.; Nellis, G.; Lutsar, I.; Vaconsin, P.; Storme, T.; Rieutord, A.; Nunn, A.J. European Study of Neonatal Exposure to Excipients: An update. Int. J. Pharm. 2013, 457, 357–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Schmidt, N.; Saez, C.; Seri, I.; Maturana, A. Impact of syringe size on the performance of infusion pumps at low flow rates. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 2010, 11, 282–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Seyberth, H.W.; Kauffman, R.E. Basics and dynamics of neonatal and pediatric pharmacology. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2011, 205, 3–49. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  100. Sherwin, C.M.; Medlicott, N.J.; Reith, D.M.; Broadbent, R.S. Intravenous drug delivery in neonates: Lessons learnt. Arch. Dis. Child. 2014, 99, 590–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Van der Eijk, A.C.; van Rens, R.M.; Dankelman, J.; Smit, B.J. A literature review on flow-rate variability in neonatal IV therapy. Paediatr. Anaesth. 2013, 23, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Vain, N.E.; Barrington, K.J. Feasibility of evaluating treatment of early hypotension in extremely low birth weight infants. J. Pediatr. 2012, 161, 4–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Dempsey, E.M.; Barrington, K.J.; Marlow, N.; O’Donnell, C.P.; Miletin, J.; Naulaers, G.; Cheung, P.Y.; Corcoran, D.; Pons, G.; Stranak, Z.; et al. Management of hypotension in preterm infants (The HIP Trial): A randomised controlled trial of hypotension management in extremely low gestational age newborns. Neonatology 2014, 105, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dempsey, E.M. Challenges in Treating Low Blood Pressure in Preterm Infants. Children 2015, 2, 272-288. https://doi.org/10.3390/children2020272

AMA Style

Dempsey EM. Challenges in Treating Low Blood Pressure in Preterm Infants. Children. 2015; 2(2):272-288. https://doi.org/10.3390/children2020272

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dempsey, Eugene M. 2015. "Challenges in Treating Low Blood Pressure in Preterm Infants" Children 2, no. 2: 272-288. https://doi.org/10.3390/children2020272

APA Style

Dempsey, E. M. (2015). Challenges in Treating Low Blood Pressure in Preterm Infants. Children, 2(2), 272-288. https://doi.org/10.3390/children2020272

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop