Next Article in Journal
A New Proximal Femur Reconstruction Technique after Bone Tumor Resection in a Very Small Patient: An Exemplificative Case
Next Article in Special Issue
Feasibility and Safety of Percutaneous Cardiac Interventions for Congenital and Acquired Heart Defects in Infants ≤1000 g
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of a 10-Week Physical Activity Programme on Fundamental Movement Skills in 3–4-Year-Old Children within Early Childhood Education Centres
Previous Article in Special Issue
Respiratory Trajectory after Invasive Interventions for Patent Ductus Arteriosus of Preterm Infants
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Single Ventricle—A Comprehensive Review

Children 2021, 8(6), 441; https://doi.org/10.3390/children8060441
by P. Syamasundar Rao
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Children 2021, 8(6), 441; https://doi.org/10.3390/children8060441
Submission received: 28 April 2021 / Revised: 20 May 2021 / Accepted: 21 May 2021 / Published: 24 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Pediatric Heart Disease Research—Neonatal Interventions)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for allowing me to review "Single Ventricle - A Comprehensive Review" by Dr Rao.  This was a very well written review on single ventricle cardiac lesions.  It is well organized, easy to read, and very comprehensive.  The only modifications I would potentially have would be minor wording adjustments that would not drastically change the content of the manuscript and thus were not worth mentioning. 

Author Response

I than the reviewer for the complimentary remarks. The manuscript was re-read and minor changes suggested were incorporated into the final script. Thanks again.

Reviewer 2 Report

The author presents an overview of single ventricle disease from physiology to management. The paper reads well and is well-supported by references and figures. I applaud the author for his comprehensive overview, and have only some comments:

  1. Can the author discuss the role and growing understanding of disparities (e.g., socioeconomic status, racial, geographical, etc.) in the management and outcomes of single ventricle patients?
  2. Given the complexity of single ventricle repair, outcomes and associated costs have widely varied across the United States. Centralization of such repairs in select, specialized centers may thus be needed. Can the author comment on the role of an institution’s/surgeon’s volume relative to their outcome (i.e., volume-outcome relationship)?

Author Response

I thank the reviewer for the complimentary remarks. The items the reviewer is asking to add are addressed n the revised manuscript. Thanks again.

Back to TopTop