Next Article in Journal
Malignant Hyperthermia in PICU—From Diagnosis to Treatment in the Light of Up-to-Date Knowledge
Previous Article in Journal
Adults’ Perception of Children’s Vowel Production
 
 
Case Report
Peer-Review Record

POCUS Diagnosis of Sternal Fractures in Children without Direct Trauma—A Case Series

Children 2022, 9(11), 1691; https://doi.org/10.3390/children9111691
by David Troxler 1,* and Johannes Mayr 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Children 2022, 9(11), 1691; https://doi.org/10.3390/children9111691
Submission received: 12 October 2022 / Revised: 29 October 2022 / Accepted: 2 November 2022 / Published: 3 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Surgery)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is an interesting case series, I just have a few questions for the authors:

Was the skin over the sternum normal? Did the present a hematoma?

How long was their follow -up? 

Did the authors consider repeating the US? If so, when?

Author Response

Dear Reviewer

We thank you for your careful review of our article and for your insightful comments.

  • The skin over the sternum did not show any hematoma or other changes in any of the patients.

 

  • There was no follow-up planned at the beginning. For the purpose of the article, all patients were followed up by phone. None of them had experienced any complications or needed a return visit to the clinic or their pediatrician. All were back to full activity after the recommended rest time (4-6 weeks)

 

  • We did not repeat any US examinations as we did not have any records of follow-up visits for those patients.

 

We added this information in the article.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

Thank you for this simple yet important manuscript. This work of yours is adequate to create awareness but inadequate with regards to what factors and findings you look for on follow up of the patients. What were the clinical findings and the appearance of the ultrasound on follow up of patients? I believe you are in A&E setting and you are highlighting POCUS as a tool. May I suggest you revise the title so that this is clearer to the readers that you are focusing on diagnostic tool. Case series are usually more detail and the loop is completed to include evidence of full recovery clinically and objectively

 

All the best!

kind regards,

Reviewer 2

Author Response

Dear Reviewer

We thank you for your careful review of our article and for your insightful comments.

 

We adapted the article title to better reflect the scope as you recommended.

As we did not see those patients for follow-up examinations we can only report their uncomplicated full recovery that we confirmed by telephone follow-ups.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop