The Role of Family Function and Triadic Interaction on Preterm Child Development—A Systematic Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Material and Methods
2.1. Search Strategy
- Concerned (a) premature infants (gestational age < 37 weeks) and/or infants with low birth weight (<2500 g) and (b) a comparison group with full-term children.
- Quantitatively analyzed family interactions (>2 individuals), with measurements made during childhood (up to 11 years), based on: (a) validated direct observation or video recording; and/or (b) self-assessment measures with good psychometric properties; and/or (c) structured interviews that after coding provided quantitative outcome measures.
- Reported a developmental outcome measure for the child based on parent and teacher assessments, self-assessments, observation, or psychometric testing.
2.2. Approaches to Studying the Family System
2.3. Instruments in Selected Studies
2.3.1. Family Environment Scale (FES)
2.3.2. Family Relation Scale (FARS)
2.3.3. Nordic Health and Family Questionnaire (NHFQ)
2.3.4. Family Assessment Device (FAD)
2.3.5. Coding Interactive Behavior Manual (CIB)
2.3.6. Family Alliance Assessment Scale (FAAS)
2.3.7. Home Atmosphere
2.4. Quality Assessment
2.5. Data Collection
2.6. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Selection of Studies
3.2. Description of Included Studies
3.3. Quality of Family Interaction
3.3.1. Children 0–2 Years
3.3.2. Children 3–8 Years
3.3.3. Children 9–11 Years
3.4. Quality of Family Interaction and Child Development
3.4.1. Children 0–2 Years
3.4.2. Children 3–8 Years
3.4.3. Children 9–11 Years
4. Discussion
4.1. Quality of Family Interaction in the Context of a Child Born Prematurely
4.2. Quality of Family Interaction and Child Development
4.3. Represented and Practicing Family
4.4. Direction of Causality
4.5. Limitations
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Robinson, R.; Lahti-Pulkkinen, M.; Schnitzlein, D.; Voit, F.; Girchenko, P.; Wolke, D.; Lemola, S.; Kajantie, E.; Heinonen, K.; Räikkönen, K. Mental health outcomes of adults born very preterm or with very low birth weight: A systematic review. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020, 25, 101113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shai, D. The Inconsolable Doll Task: Prenatal coparenting behavioral dynamics under stress predicting child cognitive development at 18 months. Infant Behav. Dev. 2019, 56, 101254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Castel, S.; Creveuil, C.; Beunard, A.; Blaizot, X.; Proia, N.; Guillois, B. Effects of an intervention program on maternal and paternal parenting stress after preterm birth: A randomized trial. Early Hum. Dev. 2016, 103, 7–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Landry, S.H.; Smith, K.E.; Swank, P.R.; Assel, M.A.; Vellet, S. Does early responsive parenting have a special importance for children’s development or is consistency across early childhood necessary? Dev. Psychol. 2001, 37, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, P.E.; Robbins, N.; Coelho, R.B.; Poehlmann, J. The paradox of prematurity: The behavioral vulnerability of late preterm infants and the cognitive susceptibility of very preterm infants at 36 months post-term. Infant Behav. Dev. 2013, 36, 50–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hadfield, K.; O’Brien, F.; Gerow, A. Is level of prematurity a risk/plasticity factor at three years of age? Infant Behav. Dev. 2017, 47, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Belsky, J.; Bakermans-Kranenburg, M.J.; Van IJzendoorn, M.H. For better and for worse: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2007, 16, 300–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Singer, L.T.; Fulton, S.; Kirchner, H.L.; Eisengart, S.; Lewis, B.; Short, E.; Min, M.O.; Kercsmar, C.; Baley, J.E. Parenting Very Low Birth Weight Children at School Age: Maternal Stress and Coping. J. Pediatr. 2007, 151, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, H.; Yang, Q.; Docherty, S.L.; White, T.R.; Holditch, D.D. Relationship of maternal psychological distress classes to later mother–infant interaction, home environment, and infant development in preterm in-fants. Res. Nurs. Health 2016, 39, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jaekel, J.; Pluess, M.; Belsky, J.; Wolke, D. Effects of maternal sensitivity on low birth weight children’s academic achievement: A test of differential susceptibility versus diathesis stress. J. Child Psychol. 2015, 56, 693–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korja, R.; Latva, R.; Lehtonen, L. The effects of preterm birth on mother-infant interaction and attachment during the infant’s first two years. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2012, 91, 164–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Merklinger-Gruchala, A.; Jasienska, G.; Kapiszewska, M. Paternal investment and low birth weight—The mediating role of parity. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0210715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- McMahon, G.E.; Spencer-Smith, M.M.; Pace, C.C.; Spittle, A.J.; Stedall, P.; Richardson, K.; Cheong, J.L.Y.; Doyle, L.W.; Anderson, P.J.; Treyvaud, K. Influence of Fathers’ Early Parenting on the Development of Children Born Very Preterm and Full Term. J. Pediatr. 2019, 205, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garnica-Torres, Z.; Gouveia, J.A.; Pedroso, J.d.S. Attachment between father and premature baby in kangaroo care in a neonatal unit of a public hospital. J. Neonatal Nurs. 2021, 27, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Minuchin, P. Families and individual development: Provocations from the field of family therapy. Child Dev. 1985, 56, 289–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Favez, N.; Frascarolo, F.; Grimard, N. The Picnic Game: Presentation of a Situation of Observation to Assess Family Interactions. Infant Ment. Health J. 2016, 37, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feldman, R. Mother-infant skin-to-skin contact (Kangaroo Care): Theoretical, clinical, and empirical aspects. Infants Young Child. 2004, 17, 145–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gueron-Sela, N.; Camerota, M.; Willoughby, M.T.; Vernon-Feagans, L.; Cox, M.J. Maternal depressive symptoms, mother-child interactions, and children’s executive function. Dev. Psychol. 2018, 54, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fivaz-Depeursinge, E.L.; Favez, N. Exploring triangulation in infancy: Two contrasted cases. Fam. Process 2006, 45, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Udry-Jørgensen, L.; Tissot, H.; Frascarolo, F.; Despland, J.N.; Favez, N. Are parents doing better when they are together? A study on the association between parental sensitivity and family-level processes. Early Child Dev. Care 2016, 186, 915–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Favez, N.; Scaiola, C.L.; Tissot, H.; Darwiche, J.; Frascarolo, F. The Family Alliance Assessment Scales: Steps toward validity and reliability of an observational assessment tool for early family interactions. J. Child Fam. Stud. 2011, 20, 23–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Feldman, R.; Masalha, S. Parent-child and triadic antecedents of children’s social competence: Cultural specificity, shared process. Dev. Psychol. 2010, 46, 455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McHale, J.P.; Rasmussen, J.L. Coparental and family group-level dynamics during infancy: Early family precursors of child and family functioning during preschool. Dev. Psychopathol. 1998, 10, 39–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Higgins, J.P.; Thomas, J.; Chandler, J.; Cumpston, M.; Li, T.; Page, M.J.; Welch, V.A. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reiss, D. The represented and practicing family: Contrasting visions of family continuity. In Relationship Disturbances in Early Childhood; Sameroff, A., Emde, R., Eds.; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 1989; pp. 191–220. [Google Scholar]
- Crnic, K.A.; Greenberg, M.T. Transactional relationships between perceived family style, risk status, and mother-child interactions in two-year-olds. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 1987, 12, 343–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, H.G.; Klein, N.; Minich, N.M.; Hack, M. Long-term family outcomes for children with very low birth weights. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2001, 155, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Eriksson, B.S.; Pehrsson, G. Relationships between the family’s way of functioning and children’s temperament as rated by parents of pre-term children. J. Child Health Care 2003, 7, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leijon, I.; Finnström, O.; Sydsjö, G.; Wadsby, M. Use of healthcare resources, family function, and socioeconomic support during the first four years after preterm birth. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003, 88, 415–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Farooqi, A.; Gothefors, L.; Serenius, F.; Hägglöf, B.; Sedin, G. Mental health and social competencies of 10- to 12-year-old children born at 23 to 25 weeks of gestation in the 1990s: A Swedish national prospective follow-up study. Pediatrics 2007, 120, 118–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Treyvaud, K.; Doyle, L.W.; Lee, K.J.; Roberts, G.; Cheong, J.L.; Inder, T.E.; Anderson, P.J. Family functioning, burden and parenting stress 2 years after very preterm birth. Early Hum. Dev. 2011, 87, 427–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lean, R.E.; Paul, R.A.; Smyser, T.A.; Smyser, C.D.; Rogers, C.E. Social adversity and cognitive, language, and motor development of very preterm children from 2 to 5 years of age. J. Pediatr. 2018, 203, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kalmár, M. The course of intellectual development in preterm and full-term children: An 8-year longitudinal study. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 1996, 19, 491–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feldman, R. Maternal versus child risk and the development of parent-child and family relationships in five high-risk populations. Dev. Psychopathol. 2007, 19, 293–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Gueron-Sela, N.; Atzaba-Poria, N.; Meiri, G.; Marks, K. The Caregiving Environment and Developmental Outcomes of Preterm Infants: Diathesis Stress or Differential Susceptibility Effects? Child Dev. 2015, 86, 1014–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gatta, M.; Miscioscia, M.; Svanellini, L.; Peraro, C.; Simonelli, A. A psychological perspective on preterm children: The influence of contextual factors on quality of family interactions. BioMed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 9152627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Moos, R.H.; Moos, B.S. Family Environment Scale Manual: Development, Applications, Research, 4th ed.; Mindgarden: Menlo Park, CA, USA; Palo Alto: Santa Clara, CA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Höök, B.; Cederblad, M. Familjerelationsskalan (FARS): Ett Självsvarsformulär för Mätning av Familjefunktion; Institutionen för Barn-och Ungdomspsykiatri, Lunds Universitet: Lund, Sweden, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Olson, D.H. Circumplex model VII: Validation studies and FACES III. Fam. Process 1986, 25, 337–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Epstein, N.B.; Baldwin, L.M.; Bishop, D.S. The McMaster family assessment device. J. Marital Fam. Ther. 1983, 9, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byles, J.; Byrne, C.; Boyle, M.H.; Offord, D.R. Ontario Child Health Study: Reliability and validity of the general functioning subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device. Fam. Process 1988, 27, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alderfer, M.A.; Fiese, B.H.; Gold, J.I.; Cutuli, J.J.; Holmbeck, G.N.; Goldbeck, L.; Chambers, C.T.; Abad, M.; Spetter, D.; Patterson, J. Evidence-based assessment in pediatric psychology: Family measures. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 2008, 33, 1046–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Feldman, R. Coding Interactive Behavior Manual; Unpublished manuscript; Bar-Ilan University: Ramat Gan, Israel, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Feldman, R.; Greenbaum, C.W.; Mayes, L.C.; Erlich, S.H. Change in mother-infant interactive behavior: Relations to change in the mother, the infant, and the social context. Infant Behav. Dev. 1997, 20, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feldman, R.; Masalha, S.; Nadam, R. Cultural perspective on work and family: Dual-earner Israeli Jewish and Arab families at the transition to parenthood. J. Fam. Psychol. 2001, 15, 492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Feldman, R.; Weller, A.; Sirota, L.; Eidelman, A.I. Testing a family intervention hypothesis: The contribution of mother-infant skin-to-skin contact (kangaroo care) to family interaction, proximity, and touch. J. Fam. Psychol. 2003, 17, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wells, G.A.; Shea, B.; O’Connell, D.; Peterson, J.; Welch, V.; Losos, M.; Tugwell, P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Non-Randomised Studies in Meta-Analyses; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute: Ottawa, ON, USA, 2011; Available online: https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp (accessed on 15 November 2021).
- Sameroff, A. Transactional models in early social relations. Hum. Dev. 1975, 18, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Treyvaud, K. Parent and family outcomes following very preterm or very low birth weight birth: A review. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014, 19, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Phillips, S.J.; Tooley, G.A. Improving child and family outcomes following complicated births requiring admission to neonatal intensive care units. Sex. Relatsh. Ther. 2005, 20, 431–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilgin, A.; Wolke, D. Maternal sensitivity in parenting preterm children: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2015, 136, 177–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Landry, S.H.; Chapieski, M.L.; Schmidt, M. Effects of maternal attention-directing strategies on preterms’ response to toys. Infant Behav. Dev. 1986, 9, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toscano, C.; Soares, I.; Mesman, J. Controlling parenting behaviors in parents of children born preterm: A meta-analysis. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 2020, 41, 230–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faure, N.; Habersaat, S.; Harari, M.M.; Müller-Nix, C.; Borghini, A.; Ansermet, F.; Tolsa, J.-F.; Urben, S. Maternal sensitivity: A resilience factor against internalizing symptoms in early adolescents born very preterm? J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 2017, 45, 671–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wijnroks, L. Early maternal stimulation and the development of cognitive competence and attention of preterm infants. Early Dev. Parent 1998, 7, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feldman, R.; Eidelman, A.I. Maternal postpartum behavior and the emergence of infant-mother and infant-father synchrony in preterm and full-term infants: The role of neonatal vagal tone. Dev. Psychobiol. 2007, 49, 290–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Schuymer, L.; De Groote, I.; Desoete, A.; Roeyers, H. Gaze aversion during social interaction in preterm infants: A function of attention skills? Infant Behav. Dev. 2012, 35, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Klein, V.C.; Gaspardo, C.M.; Martinez, F.E.; Grunau, R.E.; Linhares, M.B. Pain and distress reactivity and recovery as early predictors of temperament in toddlers born preterm. Early Hum. Dev. 2009, 85, 569–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hughes, M.B.; Shults, J.; McGrath, J.; Medoff-Cooper, B. Temperament characteristics of premature infants in the first year of life. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 2002, 23, 430–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malatesta, C.Z.; Grigoryev, P.; Lamb, C.; Albin, M.; Culver, C. Emotion socialization and expressive development in preterm and full-term infants. Child Dev. 1986, 1, 316–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feldman, R.; Greenbaum, C.W.; Yirmiya, N. Mother-infant affect synchrony as an antecedent of the emergence of self-control. Dev. Psychol. 1999, 35, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fivaz-Depeursinge, E.; Corboz-Warnery, A. The Primary Triangle; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Doering, L.V.; Dracup, K.; Moser, D. Comparison of psychosocial adjustment of mothers and fathers of high-risk infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. J. Perinatol. 1999, 19, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cooke, D.; Marais, I.; Cavanagh, R.; Kendall, G.; Priddis, L. Differences between mothers’ and fathers’ ratings of family functioning with the family assessment device: The validity of combined parent scores. Meas. Eval. Couns. Dev. 2015, 48, 226–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stevenson, H.J.; Akister, J. The McMaster model of family functioning: Observer and parental ratings in a nonclinical sample. Fam. Process 1995, 34, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akister, J.; Stevenson, H.J. Identifying families at risk: Exploring the potential of the McMaster Family Assessment Device. J. Fam. Ther. 1991, 13, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, X.X.; Wu, Y.L.; Xu, S.J.; Zhu, R.P.; Jia, X.M.; Zhang, S.F.; Huang, K.; Zhu, P.; Hao, J.H.; Tao, F.B. Maternal anxiety during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J. Affect. Disord. 2014, 159, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ding, X.; Liang, M.; Wu, Y.; Zhao, T.; Qu, G.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.; Han, T.; Ma, S.; Sun, Y. The impact of prenatal stressful life events on adverse birth outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 2021, 287, 406–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mulder, E.J.; De Medina, P.R.; Huizink, A.C.; Van den Bergh, B.R.; Buitelaar, J.K.; Visser, G.H. Prenatal maternal stress: Effects on pregnancy and the (unborn) child. Early Hum. Dev. 2002, 70, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramsey, C.N.; Abell, T.D.; Baker, L.C. The relationship between family functioning, life events, family structure, and the outcome of pregnancy. J. Fam. Pract. 1986, 22, 521–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Olhaberry, M.; León, M.J.; Sieverson, C.; Escobar, M.; Iribarren, D.; Morales-Reyes, I.; Mena, C.; Leyton, F. Is it possible to improve early childhood development with a video-feedback intervention directed at the mother-father-child triad? Res. Psychother. 2019, 22, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Database | Population | Situation | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
psycINFO | Search terms: prematurity OR “premature infant *” OR “born premature *” OR preterm OR “low birth weight” OR LBW OR VLBW OR ELBW OR “small for gestational age” Index terms: “premature birth” OR “birth weight” | Search terms: “family cohesion” OR “family cohesiv *” OR “family function” OR “family alliance” OR ”family enmeshment” OR ”coplaying” OR “family environment” OR “family interaction *” OR “Lausanne Trilogue Play” OR “triadic interaction *” | Search terms: “infant development *” OR “development * outcome *” OR “child development *” OR development * |
socINDEX | Search terms: prematurity OR “premature infant *” OR preterm OR “very low birth weight” OR VLBW OR “extremely low birth weight” OR ELBW Index terms: “PREMATURE infants” | Search terms: “family function *” OR “family environment” OR “family interaction *” | Search terms: “infant development *” OR “development * outcome *” OR “child development *” OR development * |
PubMed | Search terms: prematurity OR preterm OR “low birth weight” OR LBW OR VLBW OR ELBW OR “small for gestational age” Index terms: “Premature Birth” OR “Infant, Premature” OR “Infant, Extremely Premature” OR “Infant, Low Birth Weight” | Search terms: “family cohesion” OR “family cohesiv *” OR “family function *” OR “family alliance” OR “family enmeshment” OR “coplaying” OR “family environment” OR “family interaction *” OR “Lausanne Trilogue Play” OR “triadic interaction *” OR “mother–father–child” OR “triadic *” OR “family system” | Search terms: “infant development *” OR “child development *” OR development * Index terms: “child development” |
Article | Country | Families (n) | Age | Degree of Prematurity | Birth Weight | Method | Measure | Construct | Development Measure |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[27] | USA | 70 | 1–24 months | p:26–36 w c:39–42 w | p < 1801 g k > 2500 g | Self-assessment | FES | Family environment | Bayley-III |
[29] | Sweden | 46 | 2–8 years | p: 23–27 w c: no information | No information | Self-assessment | FARS | Family function | |
[31] | Sweden | 172 | 11 years | p: M = 24.6 w, SD = 0.7 c: M = 39.2 w, SD = 2.7 | p: M = 765 g, SD = 111 c: M = 3520 g, SD = 601 | Self-assessment | NHFQ | Family function | CBCL TRF |
[35] | Israel | 145 | 4 months | p <33 w k >36 w | p < 1650 g k > 2500 g | Observation, unstructured play | Coding: CIB | Family cohesion Family rigidity | |
[37] | Italy | 78 | 19 months | p: M = 29.7 w, SD = 3.3 c:>37 w | p: M = 1294 g SD = 602 k > 2500 g | Observation, semi-structured play | LTP Coding: FAAS | Family alliance | |
[36] | Israel | 150 | 6–12 months | p: M = 32 w SD = 1.7 c: M = 39 w SD = 1.2 | p: M= 1818 g SD = 475.8 c: M = 3322 g SD = 426.8 | Observation, semi- structured play | LTP Coding: FAAS | Family alliance | ESCS WABS Bayley-III |
[34] | Hungary | 155 | 0–8 years | p: M = 33.6 w, SD = 2.2 k > 37 w | p: M= 1746 g, SD = 361 k > 2500 g | Semi- structured interview | Coding: Home atmosphere | Home atmosphere | Budapest-Bine test |
[33] | USA | 120 | 2–5 years | p: M = 26.6 w, SD = 1.8 c: M = 39.5 w, SD = 1.0 | p: M = 943 g, SD = 258 c: M = 3372 g, SD = 484 | Self-assessment | FAD | Family dysfunction | Bayley-III WPPSI-III CELF-P2 MABC-2 |
[30] | Sweden | 78 | 4 years | p: M = 31 w, SD = 1 k > 37 w | p: M = 1740 g, SD = 190 k > 2500 g | Self-assessment | FARS | Family function | BSQ |
[28] | USA | 164 | 11 years | p: no information c: >37 w | <750 g (n = 60) 750 g–1499 g (n = 55) >2500 g (n = 49) | Self-assessment | FAD | Family function | |
[32] | Australia | 252 | 2–7 years | p: M = 27.5 w SD = 1.9 c: M = 39.1 w SD = 1.3 | p: M = 969 g SD= 221 c: M = 3318 g SD = 510 | Self-assessment | FAD | Family function |
Article | Selection (Max 3) | Comparability (Max 2) | Outcome (Max 3) | Total Quality |
---|---|---|---|---|
[27] | *** | ** | * | Poor |
[29] | *** | ** | Poor | |
[31] | *** | ** | ** | Good |
[35] | *** | ** | *** | Good |
[37] | *** | * | ** | Good |
[36] | *** | ** | *** | Good |
[34] | *** | * | ** | Good |
[33] | *** | * | ** | Good |
[30] | *** | ** | ** | Good |
[28] | *** | ** | ** | Good |
[32] | *** | * | ** | Good |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Larsson, J.; Nyborg, L.; Psouni, E. The Role of Family Function and Triadic Interaction on Preterm Child Development—A Systematic Review. Children 2022, 9, 1695. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9111695
Larsson J, Nyborg L, Psouni E. The Role of Family Function and Triadic Interaction on Preterm Child Development—A Systematic Review. Children. 2022; 9(11):1695. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9111695
Chicago/Turabian StyleLarsson, Johanna, Lisa Nyborg, and Elia Psouni. 2022. "The Role of Family Function and Triadic Interaction on Preterm Child Development—A Systematic Review" Children 9, no. 11: 1695. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9111695