Next Article in Journal
Hepatitis A Immunity and Paediatric Liver Transplantation—A Single-Centre Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Time in Range in Children with Type 1 Diabetes before and during a Diabetes Camp—A Ceiling Effect?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Children
Volume 9
Issue 12
10.3390/children9121952
children-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sex and Rural/Urban Centre Location as Determinants of Body Image Self-Perception in Preschoolers

by
Jorge Rojo-Ramos
1,
Santiago Gomez-Paniagua
2,*,
José Carmelo Adsuar
3,*,
Ángel Denche-Zamorano
3,
María Mendoza-Muñoz
4,5 and
Sabina Barrios-Fernandez
6
1
Physical Activity for Education, Performance and Health, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain
2
BioẼrgon Research Group, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain
3
Promoting a Healthy Society Research Group (PHeSO), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain
4
Research Group on Physical and Health Literacy and Health-Related Quality of Life (PHYQOL), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain
5
Departamento de Desporto e Saúde, Escola de Saúde e Desenvolvimento Humano, Universidade de Évora, 7004-516 Évora, Portugal
6
Occupation, Participation, Sustainability and Quality of Life (Ability Research Group), Nursing and Occupational Therapy College, University of Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2022, 9(12), 1952; https://doi.org/10.3390/children9121952
Submission received: 11 November 2022 / Revised: 5 December 2022 / Accepted: 10 December 2022 / Published: 12 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychological Counseling for Children and Adolescents)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Body image and self-perception are highly related to psychological health and social well-being throughout the lifespan. Body image problems can lead to pathologies affecting the quality of life. Thus, it is essential to analyse perceived self-image from an early stage. This study aimed to assess body image and dissatisfaction in preschoolers, analyzing possible differences depending on sex (boy/girl) and school location (rural/urban). The sample consisted of 304 preschoolers from Extremadura (Spain) between three and six years of age. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to evaluate the differences in scores according to sex and centre location. The results showed significant differences in the body shape perception depending on the student’s sex, with females showing higher scores in their Body Mass Index (BMI). However, females showed greater body dissatisfaction than their male counterparts, with greater disagreement between their perceived and desired figures. Actions and programmes to promote children’s healthy body image need to be implemented with consideration for differences between the sexes.

1. Introduction

Positive embodiment and body appreciation are significant aspects of health and quality of life [1]. Body image describes how a person feels, thinks, and perceives their body [2], although this term is considered to be multidimensional [3]. The most commonly used body image measures are those that evaluate the person’s appreciation of his or her physical appearance [4]. Although research on body image frequently adopts a pathologizing perspective, concentrating on body dissatisfaction, the importance of considering body appreciation and positive aspects of body image has been raised in recent years [5]. Scientific literature indicates that positive body esteem is associated with self-esteem, healthy eating habits, and higher physical activity levels regardless of sex [6,7]. Likewise, body image has been found to predict health and quality of life in both boys and girls [8]. Numerous studies have revealed several aspects of positive body image, such as positive opinions, respecting and feeling grateful for one’s body, rejecting societal ideals of attractiveness, inner positivity influencing one’s outward appearance, and having a broad conception of beauty [9]. In this line, surveys with girls and women have influenced the developmental theory of embodiment [10] which considers healthy body image as a condition of body-self unification, characterized by feeling “at one” with the body. In this sense, the ages at which these ideas start to develop may be learned through studies looking at potentially detrimental attitudes about weight and body size among youth. Some research suggests that children start to become conscious of their body image and how they feel about it at the age of three [11]. Moreover, findings suggest girls aged just three are already emotionally committed to the ideal of thinness [12]. Then, youngsters between three and six already see fat negatively and favour a lean body [13]. Spiel and colleagues discovered that children between three to five years of age preferred larger figures to symbolize negative traits as opposed to good traits [14]. Thus, preschoolers must be taught healthy attitudes toward their bodies, diet, and activity to prevent body image disorders and related pathologies [15].
On the one hand, a variety of sociocultural influences are linked to body image development [16]. Thompson et al. [17] indicate that media, friends, and parents are three elements that impact the emergence of body dissatisfaction. Parents have a significant impact on how their children see their bodies by modelling attitudes and behaviours linked to beauty [18]. Hence, research has also shown a connection between children’s body dissatisfaction and peer influence, such as teasing, dialogues, or modelling [18]. Children’s body dissatisfaction has also been linked to promotion of idealized bodies in media [19]. On the other hand, biological components are also significant for children’s body image. Body mass index (BMI) has been linked to children’s body image and usage of body modification strategies [16]. Another essential factor to consider is sex, as research has shown that males and girls may have different body worries [20].
In terms of body image assessment, methods used in research with preschoolers frequently call for neither reading proficiency nor much vocal participation from participants [21]. A commonly used technique, which has been tried with kids as young as two-and-a-half years old, is to display two to three line drawings of various sizes while reading a list of words [22]. The use of a figure rating scale in an interview setting where children are presented with age- and sex-appropriate pictorial representations of a range of body sizes, from extremely thin to extremely huge, is another [23]. Children are then asked to choose the images of themselves that they believe best represent their existing appearance (current) and their ideal appearance (ideal). Also, other tools that have been regularly used are questionnaires [24].
Consequently, the objective of the present research was to evaluate body satisfaction in preschoolers in public schools from Extremadura (Spain), assessing whether there were possible differences depending on sex or the educational centre location. This will make it possible to identify the current state of body image at the most critical ages of development, and subsequently make it possible to implement educational programs and/or lines of action depending on the studied variables.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

Participants were selected using a non-probabilistic sampling method based on convenience sampling [25]. The sample consisted of 304 preschool children (from 3 to 6 years old) from public schools in Extremadura (Spain).

2.2. Instruments

A questionnaire with five sociodemographic questions (sex, grade, school environment and age) was prepared. The Preschoolers’ Body Scale was used [26] (Appendix A). This instrument has a male and a female version, and is composed of two scales with four real body figures each: the first showing four figures in frontal position, and the four in lateral position. Figures are presented in order from thinnest to most obese and all have the same height. The first figure represents a child with low weight (BMI-child = 13.13; BMI-girl = 13.03), the second one, a normal weight (BMI-child = 16; BMI-girl = 15.06), the third, an overweight child (BMI-child = 17.1; BMI-girl = 17.06), and the last one, an obese child (BMI-child = 21.03; BMI-girl = 21.25). Children were asked about what figure most suited them (perceived figure), and then, which figure they would like to have (desired figure). Thus, to determine body dissatisfaction, the value of the desired figure scale is subtracted from the value of the perceived figure scale. Authors reported a Fleiss’ Kappa (0.61) from the judgment of ten expert paediatricians and a test–retest correlation performed with children (ρfrontal = 0.40; ρlateral = 0.55).

2.3. Procedure

Hence, the database of public schools in the Autonomous Community of Extremadura (Spain) belonging to the Department of Education and Employment of the Regional Government of Extremadura was used to access the sample (available at: http://estadisticaeducativa.educarex.es/?centros/ensenanzas/&curso=17&ensenanza_centro=101200001 accessed on February 2022). Contact data were selected for those centres with the second stage of Early Childhood Education (3 to 6 years). An e-mail was then sent to the early childhood education teachers with information about the study and requesting their collaboration. The schools with an interest to participate were sent the informed consent form to be signed by the legal guardians. Then, a member of the research team went to every educational centre to collect data from the children. In the regular classroom, with both the researcher and the teacher present, the participants first filled in the socio-demographic questionnaire with the help of the teacher. The teacher indicated to the students whether they should mark rural or urban based on the characteristics of their school (previously agreed with the researcher based on whether the localities had more or less than 20,000 inhabitants. Those with less than 20,000 inhabitants were considered rural, as stated on the website of the Diputación de Cáceres (https://www.dip-caceres.es/, accessed on February 2022). Secondly, they were given The Body Scale for Preschoolers questionnaire. They were first given the first part of the questionnaire and they were tasked for approximately 5 min to think about and select the image that most resembled them. Then they were given the second part of the questionnaire and they were asked for 5 min to think about and select the image they would like to resemble (Appendix A).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Thus, to analyse if the collected data’s distribution met the assumption of normality, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used, confirming the need to use nonparametric tests. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to analyze whether there were statistically significant differences between the figures perceived and the figures desired according to sex and centre location. Moreover, to analyze body dissatisfaction, perceived image and desired image data were treated independently for both the frontal and lateral scales and then the mean value obtained from the frontal scale and lateral scale was taken as a factor. Finally, Cronbach’s Alpha was used to calculate the reliability of each of the scales of the instrument.

3. Results

Table 1 shows the sample distribution according to sex, grade, and centre setting. The mean age of the participants was 4.42 years (SD = 0.82).
Table 2 shows the differences between the perceived (frontal and lateral) and desired (frontal and lateral) figures according to sex and centre location. Significant differences were found concerning the perceived figure according to sex, with girls obtaining higher values than boys.
Table 3 shows descriptive data and differences in body dissatisfaction according to sex and centre location. Statistically significant differences were found according to sex, with girls obtaining higher body dissatisfaction than boys. No statistically significant differences were found in the scores obtained in the perceived figure, desired figure, and dissatisfaction as a function of the centre location.
Finally, the reliability of the results for each scale was 0.87 and 0.74 for the perceived and desired figure, respectively, all being satisfactory values above 0.70 according to Nunnally and Bernstein [27].

4. Discussion

This study arises from the need to understand body image perception in preschoolers to know its current state in Extremadura (Spain) schools in order to develop intervention programs. Differences in body image perception concerning sex have been widely studied in the literature, yielding different results over time. In this study, perceived image scores were higher than those according to the ideal image, contrasting with another study in the same population [28]; although in the literature, as in this research, there is a preference for more linear figures [29]. Children at this age usually have a negative perception of larger figures mainly due to sociocultural factors [14], more pronounced in females [12], as boys prefer muscular bodies, selecting those figures that represent an intermediate score even at a young age [30]. In this line, Canadian girls of these ages’ desire to be thinner are much higher than their male peers [13]. In contrast, children may select a slimmer or larger ideal figure than their own for reasons related to their body fat and musculature, or their desire for an adult form, which should not necessarily cause them to be worried about their current perceived size [31]. Other studies have reported no differences between sexes, such as Lowes and Tiggermann [32] with no differences in schoolchildren aged 3 to 5 years nor in the perceived or desired figure; or the one carried out by Pallan [33] finding no sex differences in self-rated body image and body dissatisfaction among South Asian preschoolers.
Little literature analyzes the environment as a possible factor affecting body image at an early age. In this study, no significant differences in body image were found between educational settings despite the rural children usually showing higher physical activity levels [34]. In this regard, Williams and his group [35] analyzed the children in rural Appalachia’s perceptions of their weight in comparison to their urban peers, finding no differences between groups. Gitau and associates [36] evaluated body image in African adolescent girls, reporting a greater preference for linear figures in girls living in urban areas. These results are in line with those obtained by Jackson [37], who discovered that, compared to rural females of the same age, a higher proportion of urban Egyptian girls between the ages of nine and eleven desired to be extremely skinny. Packard and Krogstrand [38] found that most of the study’s rural participants had at least one weight concern and had engaged in dieting and desired to be thinner.
The participants in our study showed higher values on body dissatisfaction, compared with another one conducted in a similar sample [39], although this could be explained by the non-inclusion of six-year-old schoolchildren, in whom sociocultural factors affect stronger body image [40]. Then, while some studies report body dissatisfaction in the majority of their participants [29], others report satisfaction levels above 50% [23]. This desire for a different body image is usually more linear [41], increases with age [42], and is more noticeable in girls [43]. Despite this, researchers such as Damiano [23] or Musher–Eizenman [44] have found that a high percentage of students, over 40%, indicated larger figures as ideal for them. In addition, this body dissatisfaction has been highly correlated with BMI, as students who are overweight or have obesity show higher levels of body dissatisfaction than those who are not [45]. Regarding the relationship between preschoolers’ body dissatisfaction and centre location, there is little analysis in the scientific literature. Leite [46] stated that school location, whether urban or rural, was unrelated to body dissatisfaction among Brazilian students. However, Ferguson and Cramer [47] found that children from rural backgrounds showed higher self-esteem levels than those residing in urban areas in the Jamaican population. By contrast, Welch [48] found that urban students between the ages of 9 and 11 had a higher ideal body image and were more content with their bodies.
This study has several limitations. Firstly, because of the convenience sampling used, findings must be interpreted with caution. Additionally, a limited number of sociodemographic factors is insufficient to deeply characterise the students considering the numerous environmental elements that impact children’s development. Information about social network use or relationships with parents or teachers is related to body image formation at an early age [49,50,51]. Another limitation was not objectively assessing participants’ body composition, so it would be interesting to consider objective methods for the body composition assessment.

5. Conclusions

The current study focuses on analyzing the self-perceived body image of preschool children from the region of Extremadura, allowing them to evaluate body dissatisfaction levels in the early stages of development. Girls generally see themselves with a higher body mass index than boys and show greater body dissatisfaction. Centre location does not seem to be a variable to be considered in generating differences in body image, at least, in the current research.
Therefore, these results allow for the need to design and develop programs for body image in the early stages, considering sex differences.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.R.-R., S.G.-P. and J.C.A.; methodology, S.G.-P. and Á.D.-Z.; formal analysis, J.R.-R., J.C.A. and M.M.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.G.-P. and M.M.-M.; writing—review and editing, J.R.-R., S.B.-F. and Á.D.-Z.; funding acquisition, J.C.A. and S.B.-F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The use of these data did not require approval from an accredited ethics committee, as they are not covered by data protection principles, i.e., they are non-identifiable, anonymous data collected through an anonymous survey for teachers. In addition, based on Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council on 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals concerning the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (which entered into force on 25 May 2016 and has been compulsory since 25 May 2018), data protection principles do not need to be applied to anonymous information (i.e., information related to an identifiable natural person, nor to data of a subject that is not, or is no longer, identifiable). Consequently, the Regulation does not affect the processing of our information. Even for statistical or research purposes, its use does not require the approval of an accredited ethics committee.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets are available through the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Appendix A.1. Escala Corporal para Preescolares -Versión niño

Datos Sociodemográficos
  • Edad:
  • Curso:
  • Colegio:
    □
    Rural
    □
    Urbano
¿Qué niño se parece más a ti?
Children 09 01952 i001
¿A qué niño te gustaría parecerte?
Children 09 01952 i002

Appendix A.2. Escala Corporal para Preescolares -Versión niña

Datos Sociodemográficos
  • Edad:
  • Curso:
  • Colegio:
    □
    Rural
    □
    Urbano
¿Qué niña se parece más a ti?
Children 09 01952 i003
¿A qué niña te gustaría parecerte?
Children 09 01952 i004

References

  1. Tylka, T.L.; Piran, N.; Piran, N. (Eds.) The Experience of Embodiment Construct: Reflecting the Quality of Embodied Lives. In Handbook of Positive Body Image and Embodiment; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2019; ISBN 978-0-19-084187-4. [Google Scholar]
  2. National Eating Disorders Collaboration What Is Body Image? Available online: https://nedc.com.au/eating-disorders/eating-disorders-explained/body-image/ (accessed on 10 October 2022).
  3. Thompson, J.K.; Burke, N.L.; Krawczyk, R. Measurement of Body Image in Adolescence and Adulthood. In Encyclopedia of Body Image and Human Appearance; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 512–520. ISBN 978-0-12-384925-0. [Google Scholar]
  4. Krawczyk, R.; Menzel, J.; Thompson, J.K. Methodological Issues in the Study of Body Image and Appearance. In Oxford Handbook of the Psychology of Appearance; Rumsey, N., Harcourt, D., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2012; pp. 605–619. ISBN 978-0-19-958052-1. [Google Scholar]
  5. Tylka, T.L.; Wood-Barcalow, N.L. What Is and What Is Not Positive Body Image? Conceptual Foundations and Construct Definition. Body Image 2015, 14, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tylka, T.L.; Homan, K.J. Exercise Motives and Positive Body Image in Physically Active College Women and Men: Exploring an Expanded Acceptance Model of Intuitive Eating. Body Image 2015, 15, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Santos, E.M.C.; Tassitano, R.M.; do Nascimento, W.M.F.; Petribú, M.d.M.V.; Cabral, P.C. Satisfação Com o Peso Corporal e Fatores Associados Em Estudantes Do Ensino Médio. Rev. Paul. Pediatr. 2011, 29, 214–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Haraldstad, K.; Christophersen, K.-A.; Eide, H.; Nativg, G.K.; Helseth, S. Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life in a Sample of Children and Adolescents: A School Survey: Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life. J. Clin. Nurs. 2011, 20, 3048–3056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tylka, T.L.; Wood-Barcalow, N.L. The Body Appreciation Scale-2: Item Refinement and Psychometric Evaluation. Body Image 2015, 12, 53–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Piran, N.; Teall, T. The Developmental Theory of Embodiment. Preventing Eating-Related and Weight-Related Disorders: Collaborative Research, Advocacy, and Policy Change; Wilfrid Laurier University Press: Waterloo, ON, Canada, 2012; pp. 169–198. [Google Scholar]
  11. Harriger, J.; Trammell, J.; Wick, M.; Luedke, M. Gender and Age Differences in Pre-schoolers’ Weight Bias Beliefs and Behavioural Intentions. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 2019, 37, 461–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Harriger, J.A.; Calogero, R.M.; Witherington, D.C.; Smith, J.E. Body Size Stereotyping and Internalization of the Thin Ideal in Preschool Girls. Sex Roles 2010, 63, 609–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tremblay, L.; Lovsin, T.; Zecevic, C.; Larivière, M. Perceptions of Self in 3–5-Year-Old Children: A Preliminary Investigation into the Early Emergence of Body Dissatisfaction. Body Image 2011, 8, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Spiel, E.C.; Paxton, S.J.; Yager, Z. Weight Attitudes in 3- to 5-Year-Old Children: Age Differences and Cross-Sectional Predictors. Body Image 2012, 9, 524–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bun, C.J.E.; Schwiebbe, L.; Schutz, F.N.; Bijlsma-Schlosser, J.F.M.; Hirasing, R.A. Negative Body Image and Weight Loss Behaviour in Dutch School Children. Eur. J. Public Health 2012, 22, 130–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mccabe, M.; Ricciardelli, L. A Longitudinal Study of Body Image and Strategies to Lose Weight and Increase Muscles among Children. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 2005, 26, 559–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Thompson, J.K.; Heinberg, L.J.; Altabe, M.; Tantleff-Dunn, S. Exacting Beauty: Theory, Assessment, and Treatment of Body Image Disturbance; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1999; ISBN 978-1-55798-541-5. [Google Scholar]
  18. Phares, V.; Steinberg, A.R.; Thompson, J.K. Gender Differences in Peer and Parental Influences: Body Image Disturbance, Self-Worth, and Psychological Functioning in Preadolescent Children. J. Youth Adolesc. 2004, 33, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Groesz, L.M.; Levine, M.P.; Murnen, S.K. The Effect of Experimental Presentation of Thin Media Images on Body Satisfaction: A Meta-Analytic Review. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 2002, 31, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tatangelo, G.L.; Ricciardelli, L.A. A Qualitative Study of Preadolescent Boys’ and Girls’ Body Image: Gendered Ideals and Sociocultural Influences. Body Image 2013, 10, 591–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Dunkeld Turnbull, J.; Heaslip, S.; McLeod, H. Pre-School Children’s Attitudes to Fat and Normal Male and Female Stimulus Figures. Int. J. Obes. 2000, 24, 1705–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Harriger, J.A. Age Differences in Body Size Stereotyping in a Sample of Preschool Girls. Eat. Disord. 2015, 23, 177–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Damiano, S.R.; Paxton, S.J.; Wertheim, E.H.; McLean, S.A.; Gregg, K.J. Dietary Restraint of 5-Year-Old Girls: Associations with Internalization of the Thin Ideal and Maternal, Media, and Peer Influences: 5-YEAR-OLD GIRLS’ DIETARY RESTRAINT. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 2015, 48, 1166–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. McVey, G.; Tweed, S.; Blackmore, E. Healthy Schools-Healthy Kids: A Controlled Evaluation of a Comprehensive Universal Eating Disorder Prevention Program. Body Image 2007, 4, 115–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Salkind, N.J.; Escalona, R.L.; Valdés Salmerón, V. Métodos de Investigación; Prentice-Hall: México, DC, USA, 1999; ISBN 978-970-17-0234-5. [Google Scholar]
  26. León, M.P.; González-Martí, I.; Contreras, O.R. Desarrollo y Validación de La Escala Corporal Para Preescolares. RIMCAFD 2021, 21, 623–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nunnally, J.C.; Bernstein, I.H. Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed.; McGraw-Hill Series in Psychology; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1994; ISBN 978-0-07-047849-7. [Google Scholar]
  28. León, M.P.; González-Martí, I.; Contreras-Jordán, O.R. What Do Children Think of Their Perceived and Ideal Bodies? Understandings of Body Image at Early Ages: A Mixed Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ra, J.S.; Yun, H.J.; Cho, Y.H. Teachers’ Influence on Weight Perceptions in Preschool Children. Appl. Nurs. Res. 2016, 31, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. McLean, S.A.; Wertheim, E.H.; Paxton, S.J. Preferences for Being Muscular and Thin in 6-Year-Old Boys. Body Image 2018, 26, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Medina, A.M.; Arévalo, R.V.; Díaz, J.M.M.; Hernández, A.A.; Rayón, G.A. Body dissatisfaction in children and preadolescents: A systematic review / Insatisfacción corporal en niños y preadolescentes: Una revisión sistemática. Rev. Mex. Trastor. Aliment./Mex. J. Eat. Disord. 2012, 3, 62–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lowes, J.; Tiggemann, M. Body Dissatisfaction, Dieting Awareness and the Impact of Parental Influence in Young Children. Br. J. Health Psychol. 2003, 8, 135–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Pallan, M.J.; Hiam, L.C.; Duda, J.L.; Adab, P. Body Image, Body Dissatisfaction and Weight Status in South Asian Children: A Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Public Health 2011, 11, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Robatsch, J.; Voitl, P.; Diesner-Treiber, S.C. A Cross-Sectional, Exploratory Survey on Health-Relevant Free-Time Activities and Body Mass Index in Preschool Children in Urban and Rural Settings of Austria. BMC Pediatr. 2021, 21, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Williams, K.J.; Taylor, C.A.; Wolf, K.N.; Lawson, R.F.; Crespo, R. Cultural Perceptions of Healthy Weight in Rural Appalachian Youth. Rural. Remote. Health 2008, 8, 932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gitau, T.M.; Micklesfield, L.K.; Pettifor, J.M.; Norris, S.A. Changes in Eating Attitudes, Body Esteem and Weight Control Behaviours during Adolescence in a South African Cohort. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e109709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jackson, R.T.; Rashed, M.; Saad-eldin, R. Rural Urban Differences in Weight, Body Image, and Dieting Behavior among Adolescent Egyptian Schoolgirls. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2003, 54, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Packard, P.; Krogstrand, K.S. Half of Rural Girls Aged 8 to 17 Years Report Weight Concerns and Dietary Changes, with Both More Prevalent with Increased Age. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2002, 102, 672–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. León González, M.P.; González-Martí, I.; López Sánchez, G.F.; Contreras Jordán, O.R. Percepción Del Tamaño Corporal Actual y Deseado En La Niñez Temprana. PSYE 2021, 13, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hayes, S.; Tantleff-Dunn, S. Am I Too Fat to Be a Princess? Examining the Effects of Popular Children’s Media on Young Girls’ Body Image. Br. J. Devel. Psychol. 2010, 28, 413–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Birbeck, D.; Drummond, M. Very Young Children’s Body Image: Bodies and Minds under Construction. Int. Educ. J. 2006, 7, 423–434. [Google Scholar]
  42. Dohnt, H.; Tiggemann, M. The Contribution of Peer and Media Influences to the Development of Body Satisfaction and Self-Esteem in Young Girls: A Prospective Study. Dev. Psychol. 2006, 42, 929–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Dohnt, H.K.; Tiggemann, M. Peer Influences on Body Dissatisfaction and Dieting Awareness in Young Girls. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 2005, 23, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Musher-Eizenman, D.R. Body Size Stigmatization in Preschool Children: The Role of Control Attributions. J. Pediatric Psychol. 2004, 29, 613–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Lombardo, C. Studies on Body Image in Children and Adolescents with Overweight/Obesity. In Body Image, Eating, and Weight: A Guide to Assessment, Treatment, and Prevention; Cuzzolaro, M., Fassino, S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 193–205. ISBN 978-3-319-90817-5. [Google Scholar]
  46. Leite, A.C.B.; Ferrazzi, N.B.; Mezadri, T.; Höfelmann, D.A. Body Dissatisfaction among Students in Brazilian Southern City. J. Hum. Growth Dev. 2014, 24, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Ferguson, G.M.; Cramer, P. Self-Esteem among Jamaican Children: Exploring the Impact of Skin Color and Rural/Urban Residence. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 2007, 28, 345–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Welch, C.; Gross, S.M.; Bronner, Y.; Dewberry-Moore, N.; Paige, D.M. Discrepancies in Body Image Perception among Fourth-Grade Public School Children from Urban, Suburban, and Rural Maryland. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2004, 104, 1080–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wong, Y.-C.; Chang, Y.-J.; Lin, C.-J. The Influence of Primary Caregivers on Body Size and Self-Body Image of Preschool Children in Taiwan. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 22, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. McCabe, M.P.; Mellor, D.; Mealey, A. An Educational Programme for Parents on the Body Image of Preschool-Aged Boys. J. Health Psychol. 2016, 21, 1241–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Harrison, K. Media, Body Image, and Eating Disorders. In The Routledge International Handbook of Children, Adolescents and Media; Routledge: Routledge, UK, 2013; ISBN 978-0-203-36698-1. [Google Scholar]
Table
Table 1. Sample distribution (N = 304).
Table 1. Sample distribution (N = 304).
VariablesCategoriesN%
SexBoys14246.7
Girls16253.3
Centre LocationUrban16855.3
Rural13644.7
GradeFirst5417.8
Second7825.7
Third17256.6
N: number; %: percentage.
Table
Table 2. Descriptive values and differences in the scale according to sex and location of the centre.
Table 2. Descriptive values and differences in the scale according to sex and location of the centre.
SexCentre Location
ItemTotalBoysGirls RuralUrban
M (SD)M (SD)M (SD)pM (SD)M (SD)p
1. Which child do you think looks most like you? (Frontal view)2.43
(0.924)		2.23
(0.965)		2.60
(0.851)		<0.001 **2.32
(0.892)		2.52
(0.941)		0.062
2. Which child do you think looks most like you? (Lateral view)2.54
(0.866)		2.27
(0.939)		2.78
(0.722)		<0.001 **2.49
(0.843)		2.59
(0.885)		0.244
3. Which child would you like to look like (Frontal view)?1.68
(0.527)		1.65
(0.546)		1.70
(0.509)		0.3681.62
(0.545)		1.73
(0.507)		0.049
4. Which child would you like to look like (Lateral view)?1.71
(0.529)		1.67
(0.580)		1.74
(0.480)		0.1521.65
(0.551)		1.76
(0.507)		0.061
M: mean; SD: Standard deviation; Note: The p-value is significant at ** p <0.01. Each score obtained in the dimensions is based on a scale (1–4).
Table
Table 3. Descriptive data and differences in body dissatisfaction according to sex and centre locati.
Table 3. Descriptive data and differences in body dissatisfaction according to sex and centre locati.
SexCentre Location
ItemTotalBoysGirls RuralUrban
M (SD)M (SD)M (SD)pM (SD)M (SD)p
Body dissatisfaction (Frontal view)−0.75 (0.876)−0.57 (0.885)−0.90 (0.843)<0.001 **−0.69 (0.871)−0.79 (0.881)0.491
Body dissatisfaction (Lateral view)−0.83 (0.874)−0.60 (0.906)−1.03 (0.795)<0.003 **−0.83 (0.896)−0.83 (0.859)0.993
Body dissatisfaction (Mean value)−0.79 (0.791)−0.59 (0.782)−0.96 (0.759)<0.001 **−0.76 (0.783)−0.81 (0.799)0.641
M: mean; SD: Standard deviation; Note: The p-value is significant at ** p <0.01. Each score obtained in the dimensions is based on a scale (1–4).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rojo-Ramos, J.; Gomez-Paniagua, S.; Adsuar, J.C.; Denche-Zamorano, Á.; Mendoza-Muñoz, M.; Barrios-Fernandez, S. Sex and Rural/Urban Centre Location as Determinants of Body Image Self-Perception in Preschoolers. Children 2022, 9, 1952. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9121952

AMA Style

Rojo-Ramos J, Gomez-Paniagua S, Adsuar JC, Denche-Zamorano Á, Mendoza-Muñoz M, Barrios-Fernandez S. Sex and Rural/Urban Centre Location as Determinants of Body Image Self-Perception in Preschoolers. Children. 2022; 9(12):1952. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9121952

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rojo-Ramos, Jorge, Santiago Gomez-Paniagua, José Carmelo Adsuar, Ángel Denche-Zamorano, María Mendoza-Muñoz, and Sabina Barrios-Fernandez. 2022. "Sex and Rural/Urban Centre Location as Determinants of Body Image Self-Perception in Preschoolers" Children 9, no. 12: 1952. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9121952

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop