Next Article in Journal
Efficacy of a Robot-Assisted Intervention in Improving Learning Performance of Elementary School Children with Specific Learning Disorders
Previous Article in Journal
The Management of Asymptomatic Congenital Pulmonary Airway Malformation: Results of a European Delphi Survey
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Children
Volume 9
Issue 8
10.3390/children9081154
children-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

External Male Genitalia in Henoch–Schönlein Syndrome: A Systematic Review

by
Valentina M. L. Montorfani-Janett
1,†,
Gabriele E. Montorfani
1,†,
Camilla Lavagno
2,
Gianluca Gualco
3,4,
Mario G. Bianchetti
1,4,
Gregorio P. Milani
5,6,
Sebastiano A. G. Lava
7,8,* and
Marirosa Cristallo Lacalamita
9
1
Family Medicine, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
2
Pediatric Emergency Department, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
3
Pediatric Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
4
Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
5
Pediatric Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
6
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
7
Pediatric Cardiology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
8
Heart Failure and Transplantation, Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London WC1N 3JH, UK
9
Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors equally contributed to this work.
Children 2022, 9(8), 1154; https://doi.org/10.3390/children9081154
Submission received: 27 June 2022 / Revised: 16 July 2022 / Accepted: 26 July 2022 / Published: 30 July 2022
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The external genitalia are notoriously implicated in every fifth male with Henoch–Schönlein syndrome. Nonetheless, the underlying conditions are poorly categorized. To characterize the involvement of the external male genitalia in this vasculitis, we performed a systematic review of the literature. For the final analysis, we selected 85 reports published between 1972 and 2022, which reported on 114 Henoch–Schönlein cases (≤ 18 years, N = 104) with a penile (N = 18), a scrotal (N = 77), or both a penile and a scrotal (N = 19) involvement. The genital involvement mostly appeared concurrently with or after the cutaneous features of Henoch–Schönlein syndrome, while it preceded the presentation of Henoch–Schönlein syndrome in 10 cases. Patients with penile involvement (N = 37) presented with swelling (N = 26), erythema (N = 23), and purpuric rash (N = 15). Most patients were otherwise asymptomatic except for transient micturition disorders (N = 2) or priapism (N = 2). Patients with scrotal involvement (N = 96) presented with pain (N = 85), swelling (N = 79), erythema (N = 42), or scrotal purpura (N = 22). The following scrotal structures were often involved: scrotal skin (N = 83), epididymis (N = 49), and testes (N = 39). An ischemic testicular damage was noted in nine patients (four with torsion and five without). The scrotal skin involvement was mostly bilateral, while that of the epididymis and testis were mostly (p < 0.0001) unilateral (with a significant predilection for the left side). In conclusion, this analysis allows for better categorization of the involvement of external male genitalia in Henoch–Schönlein vasculitis. Scrotal involvement can result from skin inflammation, epididymitis, orchitis, or testicular ischemia.

1. Introduction

Henoch–Schönlein syndrome, nowadays known also as immunoglobulin A purpura, is the most common form of small-vessel leukocytoclastic vasculitis in childhood. The hallmarks of the disease include palpable purpura concentrated in dependent areas, abdominal pain, joint pain or swelling, and glomerular kidney disease [1,2].
Allen is generally credited as the first to recognize, in 1960, the involvement of male external genitalia in Henoch–Schönlein syndrome [3]. However, two cases were reported before First World War [4,5]. A scrotal or penile swelling with erythema or pain occurs in approximately 20% of males with Henoch–Schönlein syndrome and is usually self-limited [1,2]. Yet, the underlying conditions are only poorly defined. To characterize the involvement of the external male genitalia in this form of vasculitis, we performed a systematic review of the literature.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Source

To increase the rigor of the work, we undertook this review in agreement with the 2020 version of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology, a set of items for reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses [6]. Three databases, namely Excerpta Medica, the United States National Library of Medicine, and the Web of Science were searched without limitations for original articles or letters published after 1960 using the following terms entered in separate pairs: (“anaphylactoid purpura” OR “Henoch–Schönlein” OR “Henoch” OR “IgA purpura” OR “IgA vasculitis” OR “immunoglobulin A purpura” OR “immunoglobulin A vasculitis” OR “rheumatoid purpura” OR “Schönlein–Henoch”) AND (“epididymis” OR “external genitalia” OR “penile” OR “penis” OR “penoscrotal” OR “scrotal” OR “scrotum” OR “testicles”). References listed within bibliographies of the retrieved records and relevant articles on authors’ personal files were also considered for inclusion. Furthermore, to detect as many cases as possible relating to this form of vasculitis, articles that were published in journals but not indexed in databases were also evaluated [7].

2.2. Eligibility Criteria and Data Extraction

Eligible sources were defined as original articles or letters reporting previously healthy males with the distinctive features of Henoch–Schönlein syndrome associated with a properly documented involvement of the external genitalia, i.e., scrotal skin, scrotal content, or penis.
The diagnosis of Henoch–Schönlein syndrome [1,2] made in the original reports was reviewed using recognized criteria (palpable purpura along with at least one of the following symptoms: abdominal pain, acute arthritis or arthralgia in any joint, or kidney involvement as evidenced by pathological hematuria with or without pathological proteinuria). A biopsy study was not a prerequisite for the diagnosis.
From each reported case of Henoch–Schönlein syndrome with involvement of the external genitalia, a prospectively defined schedule was used to excerpt data on age; pre-existing chronic conditions; infections (usually an upper respiratory infection, vaccinations or hymenoptera stings preceding the disease by ≤14 days); cutaneous, abdominal, articular, kidney, penile or scrotal involvement; imaging studies; intraoperative findings; histopathology and immunofluorescence findings; management; and course. The Cutaneous, Abdominal, Articular and Renal involvements [1] were scored on the CAAR grading scale (Table 1). The time interval between appearance of skin lesions and genital involvement was recorded. The clinical data, i.e., medical history, symptoms and signs (such as swelling, erythema, pain, difficult micturition or priapism), the intraoperative findings, and the results of imaging studies were used to categorize the involvement of penis, scrotal skin, and scrotal content, i.e., epididymis, spermatic cord, and testes [8,9]. The existence of an associated hydrocele was also addressed.
Two authors separately performed the literature search, the selection of articles retained for the analysis, and the data extraction. Any discrepancies were resolved through discussion until consensus was reached. If needed, a senior author was consulted. One author entered the data into a spreadsheet and the second author verified the accuracy of data entry.

2.3. Completeness of Reporting—Analysis

According to our standard procedure, the comprehensiveness in reporting each case was graded as satisfactory, good, or high [10].
Categorical variables are reported as proportions and continuous variables as medians with interquartile ranges. Dichotomous categorical variables were compared using the Fisher exact test; ordered categorical variables were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test and the post hoc Bonferroni–Dunn correction [11]. A two-sided significance level of 0.05 was used.

3. Results

3.1. Search Results

The literature search returned 319 potentially relevant records (Figure 1). For the final analysis, we selected 85 reports published between 1972 and 2022 [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96]: 44 from Europe (Turkey, N = 13; Spain, N = 9; Italy, N = 7; United Kingdom, N = 5; Switzerland, N = 3; Austria, N = 2; Ireland, N = 1; The Netherlands, N = 1; Norway, N = 1; Portugal, N = 1; Wales, N = 1), 21 from America (United States of America, N = 18; Canada, N = 3), 18 from Asia (Japan, N = 8; Israel, N = 3; South Korea, N = 2; India, N = 1; Islamic Republic of Iran, N = 1; People’s Republic of China, N = 1; Republic of China, N = 1; Saudi Arabia, N = 1), and 2 from Oceania (Australia, N = 2). They were published in English (N = 66), Spanish (N = 9), Turkish (N = 4), Italian (N = 3), French (N = 1), German (N = 1), and Norwegian (N = 1). A total of 114 male Henoch–Schönlein patients with involvement of the external genitalia were reported in the 85 articles. Reporting completeness was graded as satisfactory in 20 (17%), good in 58 (51%), and high in the remaining 36 (32%) cases.

3.2. General Data

3.2.1. General Data

The characteristics of the 114 patients, composed of 104 (91%) children and 10 (9%) adults, appear in Table 2. An isolated penile involvement was observed in 18 [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25], an isolated scrotal involvement in 77 [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83], and a penoscrotal involvement in the remaining 19 [84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96] cases. An infection or, more rarely, a vaccine or a hymenoptera sting, preceded the clinical onset of the vasculitis in approximately 40% of cases. Genital involvement preceded the characteristic presentation of Henoch–Schönlein syndrome in no more than 10% of cases. Cutaneous, articular, abdominal, and kidney involvement were mostly mild to moderate.
Subjects with scrotal, penile, or penoscrotal involvement did not significantly differ with respect to age, precursors, and severity of cutaneous, articular, or renal involvement. The abdominal involvement was significantly (p < 0.03) more severe in patients with scrotal or penoscrotal involvement than in subjects with isolated penile involvement.
The clinical diagnosis of Henoch–Schönlein syndrome was supported by 24 extragenital (skin, N = 22; kidney, N = 2) and eight genital (testicle, N = 6; appendix testis, N = 1; appendix epididymis, N = 1) histopathology studies. Immunofluorescence testing for immunoglobulin A deposits was performed in 13 cases (skin, N = 10; kidney, N = 2; testicle, N = 1) and all had positive results.

3.2.2. Penile Involvement

Swelling, erythema, purpuric rash, and pain were the most-reported manifestations in the 37 cases with penile involvement (Table 3). Transient micturition disorders induced by penile swelling were observed in a 2- and an 11-year-old patient [18,94]. Placement of a suprapubic catheter for one week was necessary in the latter case [94].
A priapism was observed in two cases. In a 9-year-old boy with erection of the penis for 9 h, detumescence occurred after caudal anesthesia [15]. In a 37-year-old man with an inherited thrombophilia secondary to a prothrombin gene mutation, a bilateral deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities and a thrombosis of the dorsal penile vein, causing priapism, were noted. Despite systemic anticoagulation and intracavernous irrigation of epinephrine and streptokinase, an inability to obtain an erection firm enough for sexual intercourse was observed. Consequently, a penile prosthesis was implanted [16].
The duration of penile involvement was documented in 24 of the 37 cases. Seventeen patients were treated with corticosteroids and seven without. The duration of penile involvement after diagnosis was 4 [2,3,4,5,6] days in cases with steroids and 9 [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17] days in cases without (p < 0.05).

3.2.3. Scrotal Involvement

A scrotal involvement occurred in 96 cases. The main presenting features were pain (N = 85; 89%), swelling (N = 79; 82%), erythema (N = 42; 44%), and scrotal purpura (N = 22; 23%). Pain was reported by all patients with scrotal content (i.e., epidydimal, testicular or spermatic cord) involvement. A surgical scrotal exploration was performed in 26 (27%) cases. A total of 213 anatomical scrotal structures were involved in the aforementioned patients (Table 4). The scrotal skin (86%), the epididymis (51%), the testes (41%), and the spermatic cord (15%) were, in descending order of frequency, the most affected structures. Twenty-three cases presented both with epididymitis and orchitis (for this association both the term epididymo-orchitis and “testiculitis” are used). The involvement of the scrotal skin was mostly bilateral; that of the epididymis, testes, and spermatic cord were mostly (p < 0.0001) unilateral (with a predilection for the left side). The Venn diagram depicting the cases with scrotal skin, testicular, spermatic cord, and epididymal involvement appears in Figure 2.
An ischemic testicular lesion was noted in nine cases who presented with pain (N = 9), scrotal swelling (N = 7), and erythema (N = 4). The diagnosis of ischemic testicular damage without torsion [32,54,78,79,81] was made in five cases (5, 8, 11, 12 and 24 years of age), and an orchidectomy was performed in four of the five cases [32,54,78,79]. The diagnosis of testicular torsion [27,40,76,83] was made in four cases (2, 4, 5, and 6 years of age); a testicular detorsion was performed in all of them, and was immediately followed by a normal testicular perfusion [27,40,76,83].
The duration of the scrotal involvement after diagnosis was documented in 53 of the 96 cases. Twenty-nine patients were treated with corticosteroids and twenty-four were treated without. The duration of scrotal involvement was 4 [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10] days in cases with steroids and 3 [2,3,4,5,6] days in cases without (p = 0.445).

4. Discussion

The external genitalia are implicated in every fifth male with Henoch–Schönlein syndrome [1,2]. Integrating and complementing the results of a recent review analyzing Henoch–Schönlein syndrome with scrotal involvement in 21 children [82], the discussion of this review will address the temporal relationship between the distinctive features of this vasculitis and the genital participation, the histopathology features, and the characteristics of penile and scrotal involvement, with emphasis on the ischemic testicular damage, and management.
The scrotal and penile involvement mostly appear concurrently with or after the cutaneous features of Henoch–Schönlein syndrome. However, contrary to a widely held view, genital involvement may occasionally be the presenting clinical sign. Histopathology data demonstrate that the genital disease directly results from the vasculitis process. Local swelling, erythema, and purpuric rash characterize the penile involvement in Henoch–Schönlein syndrome. Micturition disorders and priapism are uncommon complications of penile involvement. Scrotal swelling, erythema (with or without associated purpuric rash), or pain may be induced by a scrotal skin inflammation or, less frequently, by an epididymal or testicular involvement. The right spermatic vein drains directly into the low-pressure inferior caval vein, while on the left side, the spermatic vein joins with the relatively high-pressure renal vein [97]. This anatomic difference likely explains why most cases with testicular, epidydimal, or spermatic chord participation are on the left side or are bilateral. Since vasculitides may result in vessel occlusion, the sporadic occurrence of ischemic testicular damage is not surprising. In contrast, we did not find data in the literature to support the association of Henoch–Schönlein syndrome with testicular torsion.
Every male Henoch–Schönlein patient with scrotal swelling, erythema, or pain requires careful evaluation [1,2,98,99]. The physical examination includes the inspection of the genital area and the palpation of the scrotal skin along with its content. While the underlying cause in most cases of painless scrotal sac swelling and erythema can be determined by history and physical examination alone, scrotal ultrasound and high-resolution color (and pulsed) Doppler imaging are sometimes crucial [8,9,98,99] to assess and categorize these patients, and particularly to exclude conditions that compromise testicular blood flow (Table 5, Figure 3).
The present data demonstrates that Henoch–Schönlein syndrome is a self-limited condition that usually lasts ≤ 8 weeks in cases both with and without the involvement of external genitalia. Although systemic corticosteroids are often prescribed (and might perhaps reduce the duration of penile involvement), the literature suggests that these agents effectively reduce bothersome symptoms such as abdominal or joint pain, but do not prevent the development of kidney disease [1,2]. Therefore, supportive management is usually advised. Corticosteroids are justified exclusively in cases with a disturbing genital (or, as known, abdominal) involvement.
This review has some limitations. First, it integrates cases published between 1972 and 2022, which were not always well-documented. Second, since clinical practice recommendations can be difficult to infer from the accumulation of case reports, suggested management arises from low-quality evidence. The strength of this review is that it first details the spectrum of conditions that account for an acute involvement of the male external genitalia in Henoch–Schönlein syndrome, including scrotal skin inflammation, epididymitis, orchitis, and ischemic testicular damage (both without and with torsion). Furthermore, we were able to include more than 110 Henoch–Schönlein cases with involvement of the male external genitalia.
In conclusion, Henoch–Schönlein purpura can present with a penile, penoscrotal or scrotal involvement. Scrotal involvement can result from skin inflammation, epididymitis, funiculitis, orchitis, or testicular ischemia, often combined.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: C.L., M.G.B. and S.A.G.L. Study design and Methodology: M.G.B., S.A.G.L., G.P.M. and M.C.L. Literature search and selection: V.M.L.M.-J. and G.E.M. Data analysis: V.M.L.M.-J., G.E.M., G.P.M., S.A.G.L. and M.C.L. Writing-original draft preparation: V.M.L.M.-J., G.E.M., M.G.B. and S.A.G.L. Critical revision of the manuscript: C.L., G.G. and M.C.L. Supervision: M.G.B., S.A.G.L. and G.P.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable (systematic review of the literature).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

S.A.G.L. is the current recipient of research grants from Fonds de perfectionnement, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland; Fondation SICPA, Prilly, Switzerland; Fondazione Ettore Balli, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Fondazione per il bambino malato della Svizzera italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland; and Frieda Locher-Hofmann Stiftung, Zurich, Switzerland.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lava, S.A.G.; Milani, G.P.; Fossali, E.F.; Simonetti, G.D.; Agostoni, C.; Bianchetti, M.G. Cutaneous manifestations of small-vessel leukocytoclastic vasculitides in childhood. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2017, 53, 439–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nicoara, O.; Twombley, K. Immunoglobulin A nephropathy and immunoglobulin A vasculitis. Pediatr. Clin. N. Am. 2019, 66, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Allen, D.M.; Diamond, L.K.; Howell, D.A. Anaphylactoid purpura in children (Schönlein-Henoch syndrome): Review with a follow-up of the renal complications. Am. J. Dis. Child. 1960, 99, 833–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Don, A. A case of Henoch’s purpura associated with angioneurotic oedema. Lancet 1909, 174, 526–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Lederer, R. Zur Frage der Purpura abdominalis (Henoch). Eur. J. Pediatr. 1913, 6, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2021, 134, 178–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Boell, S.K.; Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. On being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews in IS. J. Inf. Technol. 2015, 30, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Aso, C.; Enríquez, G.; Fité, M.; Torán, N.; Piró, C.; Piqueras, J.; Lucaya, J. Gray-scale and color Doppler sonography of scrotal disorders in children: An update. Radiographics 2005, 25, 1197–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sweet, D.E.; Feldman, M.K.; Remer, E.M. Imaging of the acute scrotum: Keys to a rapid diagnosis of acute scrotal disorders. Abdom. Radiol. 2020, 45, 2063–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vismara, S.A.; Lava, S.A.G.; Kottanattu, L.; Simonetti, G.D.; Zgraggen, L.; Clericetti, C.M.; Bianchetti, M.G.; Milani, G.P. Lipschütz’s acute vulvar ulcer: A systematic review. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2020, 179, 1559–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Brown, G.W.; Hayden, G.F. Nonparametric methods. Clinical applications. Clin. Pediatr. 1985, 24, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Burrows, N.P.; Sonnex, C.; Roberts, S.O.; Carne, C.A. Cutaneous vasculitis presenting on the penis. Genitourin. Med. 1993, 69, 301–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sandell, J.; Ramanan, R.; Shah, D. Penile involvement in Henoch-Schönlein purpura. Indian J. Pediatr. 2002, 69, 529–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ferrara, P.; Marrone, G.; Nicoletti, A.; Mastrangelo, A.; Tiberi, E.; Rigante, D.; Stabile, A. Penile involvement in Henoch-Schönlein purpura with good prognosis. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 2007, 41, 567–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lind, J.; Mackay, A.; Withers, S.J. Henoch-Schönlein purpura and priapism. J. Paediatr. Child. Health 2002, 38, 526–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sari, I.; Akar, S.; Secil, M.; Birlik, M.; Kefi, A.; Onen, F.; Celebi, I.; Akkoc, N. Thrombosis and priapism in a patient with Henoch-Schönlein purpura. Rheumatol. Int. 2005, 25, 472–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pennesi, M.; Biasotto, E.; Saccari, A. Schönlein-Henoch purpura involving the penis. Arch. Dis. Child. 2006, 91, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Caliskan, B.; Guven, A.; Atabek, C.; Gok, F.; Demirbag, S.; Surer, I. Henoch-Schönlein purpura presenting with symptoms mimicking balanoposthitis. Pediatr. Rep. 2009, 1, e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Güven, A.; Çalişkan, B.; Gök, F.; Öztürk, H. Balanopostit Benzeri Şikayetler İle Başvuran Henoch-Schönlein Purpurası [Henoch-Schöenlein purpura presenting with symptoms mimicking balanopostitis]. Turk. J. Pediatr. Dis. 2010, 4, 53–55. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yavaşcan, Ö.; Çelik, T.; Anil, M.; Kasap Demir, B.; Aksu, N. Penile involvement and Henoch-Schönlein purpura: A case report. Turk. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2012, 21, 98–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Paydary, K.; Emamzadeh Fard, S.; Mahboubi, A.H.; Ziaee, V.; Moradinejad, M.H.; Kajbafzadeh, A.M. Penile Skin Involvement as the First Presentation of Henoch-Schönlein Purpura Report of Nine Cases and Review of Literature. Iran J. Pediatr. 2015, 25, e2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Croche Santander, B.; Campos, E.; Sánchez, A.; Marcos, L.; Díaz, I.; Toro, C. Púrpura de Schönlein-Henoch con afectación peniana: Caso clínico [Henoch-Schönlein purpura involving the penis: A case report]. Arch. Argent. Pediatr. 2016, 114, e249–e251. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Kumar, K.J.; Ramaswamy, S. Henoch Schönlein Purpura with penile involvement. Indian Pediatr. 2016, 53, 757. [Google Scholar]
  24. Moussaoui, D.; Barasche, J.; Lacroix, L. Images in paediatrics: Rare and striking complication of Henoch-Schönlein purpura. Arch. Dis. Child. 2020, 105, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Kaya Akca, U.; Batu, E.D.; Serin, O.; Ipek, O.F.; Aydin, O.; Teksam, O.; Bilginer, Y.; Ozen, S. Penile involvement of immunoglobulin A vasculitis/Henoch-Schönlein purpura. J. Pediatr. Urol. 2021, 17, 409.e1–409.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sahn, D.J.; Schwartz, A.D. Schönlein-Henoch syndrome: Observations on some atypical clinical presentations. Pediatrics 1972, 49, 614–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Loh, H.S.; Jalan, O.M. Testicular torsion in Henoch-Schönlein syndrome. Br. Med. J. 1974, 268, 96–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Crosse, J.E.; Soderdahl, D.W.; Schamber, D.T. “Acute scrotum” in Henoch-Schönlein syndrome. Urology 1976, 7, 66–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Khan, A.U.; Williams, T.H.; Malek, R.S. Acute scrotal swelling in Henoch-Schönlein syndrome. Urology 1977, 10, 139–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Naiman, J.L.; Harcke, T.; Sebastianelli, J.; Stein, B.S. Scrotal imaging in the Henoch-Schönlein syndrome. J. Pediatr. 1978, 92, 1021–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mikuz, G.; Hofstädter, F.; Hager, J. Testis involvement in Schönlein-Henoch purpura. Pathol. Res. Pract. 1979, 165, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Menardi, G.; Hager, J.; Mikuz, G. Hodenbeteiligung bei der Purpura Schönlein-Henoch [Involvement of the testes in Schönlein-Henoch purpura]. ZFA 1980, 56, 1540–1542. [Google Scholar]
  33. Stein, B.S.; Kendall, A.R.; Harke, H.T.; Naiman, J.L.; Karafin, L. Scrotal imaging in the Henoch-Schönlein syndrome. J. Urol. 1980, 124, 568–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. O’Regan, S.; Robitaille, P. Orchitis mimicking testicular torsion in Henoch-Schönlein’s purpura. J. Urol. 1981, 126, 834–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. López García, J.A.; Sanz Jaka, J.P.; Vivanco Martínez, J.; Arocena Lanz, F. Afectación testicular en el síndrome de Schönlein-Henoch [Testicular involvement in the Schoenlein-Henoch syndrome]. Arch. Esp. Urol. 1983, 36, 49–51. [Google Scholar]
  36. Colloi, D.; Raimondi, A. Interessamento gonadico nella sindrome di Schönlein-Henoch [Gonadal involvement in the Schönlein-Henoch syndrome]. Pediatr. Med. Chir. 1984, 6, 121–123. [Google Scholar]
  37. Clark, W.R.; Kramer, S.A. Henoch-Schönlein purpura and the acute scrotum. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1986, 21, 991–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hardoff, D.; Jaffe, M.; Front, H. Recurrent episodes of testicular swelling preceding Henoch-Schönlein purpura by 11 months. Eur. J. Pediatr. 1987, 146, 613–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ross, W.B.; Davis-Reynolds, L.M. Epididymal involvement in Henoch-Schönlein purpura mimicking testicular torsion. J. R. Coll. Surg. Edinb. 1987, 32, 247. [Google Scholar]
  40. López Avila, F.J.; Cagigas Daza, P.; Lamas Meilan, C.; Mosteiro Ponce, J.A. Torsión testicular asociada a púrpura de Schönlein-Henoch. A propósito de un caso. Bol. Pediatr. 1990, 31, 365–367. [Google Scholar]
  41. Chamberlain, R.S.; Greenberg, L.W. Scrotal involvement in Henoch-Schönlein purpura: A case report and review of the literature. Pediatr. Emerg. Care 1992, 8, 213–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Laor, T.; Atala, A.; Teele, R.L. Scrotal ultrasonography in Henoch-Schönlein purpura. Pediatr. Radiol. 1992, 22, 505–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Singer, J.I.; Kissoon, N.; Gloor, J. Acute testicular pain: Henoch-Schönlein purpura versus testicular torsion. Pediatr. Emerg. Care 1992, 8, 51–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Sudakoff, G.S.; Burke, M.; Rifkin, M.D. Ultrasonographic and color Doppler imaging of hemorrhagic epididymitis in Henoch-Schönlein purpura. J. Ultrasound Med. 1992, 11, 619–621, Erratum in J. Ultrasound Med. 1993, 12, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bosio, M.; Ravelli, A.; Ruperto, N.; Migliori, C.; Perotti, F.; Scotta, M.S.; Martini, A. Sindrome di Schönlein-Henoch con severo interessamento multisistemico [The Schönlein-Henoch syndrome with severe multisystemic involvement]. Minerva Pediatr. 1993, 45, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Melloul, M.M.; Garty, B.Z. Radionuclide scrotal imaging in anaphylactoid purpura. Clin. Nucl. Med. 1993, 18, 298–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ben-Chaim, J.; Korat, E.; Shenfeld, O.; Shelhav, A.; Jonas, P.; Goldwasser, B. Acute scrotum caused by Henoch-Schönlein purpura, with immediate response to short-term steroid therapy. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1995, 30, 1509–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Romero Pérez, P.; Amat Cecilia, M.; Rafie Mazkletti, W.; Merenciano Cortina, F.J. Hematoma escrotal agudo en la púrpura de Schönlein-Henoch. Manifestación urológica infrecuente [Acute scrotal hematoma in Schoenlein-Henoch purpura. Infrequent urologic manifestation]. Actas Urol. Esp. 1997, 21, 489–493. [Google Scholar]
  49. Suarez González, J.A.; Pello Fonseca, J.M.; Rivas del Fresno, M.; Cuervo Calvo, F.J.; Castaño González-Coto, D.; Alonso Ordoñez, M.A.; Herrero Alvarez, M.C.; Muruamendiaraz Fernández, V. Escroto agudo: Un modo de presentación insólito de la púrpura de Schönlein-Henoch [Acute scrotum: Unusual presentation of Schönlein-Henoch purpura]. Actas Urol. Esp. 1997, 21, 78–81. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Lee, J.S.; Choi, S.K. Acute scrotum in 7 cases of Schönlein-Henoch syndrome. Yonsei Med. J. 1998, 39, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Gunasekaran, T.S.; Hassall, E. The swollen, scarlet scrotum: An uncommon manifestation of a common disorder. J. Pediatr. 1999, 134, 97–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Diana, A.; Gaze, H.; Laubscher, B.; De Meuron, G.; Tschantz, P. A case of pediatric Henoch-Schönlein purpura and thrombosis of spermatic veins. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2000, 35, 1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. López, D.; Piñeiro, M.C.; Velasco, R.; López, J.C.; Fidalgo, I. Escroto agudo y púrpura de Schönlein-Henoch; presentación de un caso. Rev. Pediatr. Aten. Primaria 2000, 2, 247–251. [Google Scholar]
  54. Sakai, N.; Kawamoto, K.; Fukuoka, H.; Nakajima, S.; Kurozumi, H. Acute scrotal swelling in Henoch-Schönlein purpura: A case report. Hinyokika Kiyo 2000, 46, 739–741. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Gómez Parada, J.; Puyol Pallás, M.; Vila Cots, J.; Comesías González, M.J.; Gallastegui Dañobeitia, J.C. Escroto agudo y púrpura de Schönlein-Henoch: Presentación de dos nuevos casos [Acute scrotum and Schönlein-Henoch purpura: Report of 2 new cases]. Arch. Esp. Urol. 2001, 54, 168–170. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Dayanir, Y.O.; Akdilli, A.; Karaman, C.Z.; Sönmez, F.; Karaman, G. Epididymoorchitis mimicking testicular torsion in Henoch-Schönlein purpura. Eur. Radiol. 2001, 11, 2267–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Trapasso, E.; Brenna, S.; Marinetti, A.; Salvini, V. Acute scrotum as a rare initial finding of Henoch-Schönlein purpura: Importance of ultrasound and Doppler. Ital. J. Pediatr. 2003, 29, 337–338. [Google Scholar]
  58. Hara, Y.; Tajiri, T.; Matsuura, K.; Hasegawa, A. Acute scrotum caused by Henoch-Schönlein purpura. Int. J. Urol. 2004, 11, 578–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Huang, L.H.; Yeung, C.Y.; Shyur, S.D.; Lee, H.C.; Huang, F.Y.; Wang, N.L. Diagnosis of Henoch-Schönlein purpura by sonography and radionuclear scanning in a child presenting with bilateral acute scrotum. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2004, 37, 192–195. [Google Scholar]
  60. Søreide, K.; Ansorge, C.; Øgreid, P. Skrotal smerte og Henoch-Schönleins purpura [Scrotal pain and Henoch-Schönlein purpura]. Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen. 2004, 124, 335–336. [Google Scholar]
  61. Jequier, M.; Thurler-Thiele, F.; Lepori, D.; Gehri, M. Cas radiologique du mois. A propos d’un cas de testicule tuméfié et douloureux [Radiological quiz of the month. A case of a swollen and painful testis in a child]. Arch. Pédiatr. 2005, 12, 1513–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Santiago Lozano, M.J.; Sánchez Miranda, M.P.; Solaguren Alberdi, R.; Sánchez-Redondo, M.D.; Martín-Sacristán, B.; Herrera López, M. Púrpura de Schönlein-Henoch: Un caso complejo [Schönlein-Henoch purpura: A complex case]. An. Pediatr. 2005, 63, 461–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Davol, P.; Mowad, J.; Mowad, C.M. Henoch-Schönlein purpura presenting with orchitis: A case report and review of the literature. Cutis 2006, 77, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Fukuda, S.; Takahashi, T.; Kumori, K.; Takahashi, Y.; Yasuda, K.; Kasai, T.; Yamaguchi, S. Idiopathic testicular infarction in a boy initially suspected to have acute epididymo-orchitis associated with mycoplasma infection and Henoch-Schönlein purpura. J. Pediatr. Urol. 2009, 5, 68–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Mizuashi, M.; Okuyama, R.; Matsumura, N.; Sugisaki, K.; Aiba, S. Facial purpura and scrotal swelling: A quiz. Henoch-Schönlein purpura. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2009, 89, 549–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Palumbo, E. Diagnosis of Henoch-Schönlein purpura in a child presenting with bilateral acute scrotum. Acta Biomed. 2009, 80, 289–291. [Google Scholar]
  67. Akgun, C. A case of scrotal swelling mimicking testicular torsion preceding Henoch-Schönlein vasculitis. Bratisl. Lek. Listy 2012, 113, 382–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Sakanoue, M.; Higashi, Y.; Kawai, K.; Sugita, S.; Kanekura, T. Henoch-Schönlein purpura with epididymitis in an adult. J. Dermatol. 2011, 38, 620–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. de Santiago García-Caro, E.; Berzosa López, R.; Ledesma Albarrán, J.M.; Núñez Cuadros, E.; García-Caro García, E.; Gutiérrez Schiaffino, G. Presentación atípica de la púrpura de Schönlein-Henoch. Form. Act. Pediatr. Aten. Prim. 2012, 5, 258–261. [Google Scholar]
  70. Güneş, M.; Kaya, C.; Koca, O.; Keles, M.O.; Karaman, M.I. Acute scrotum in Henoch-Schönlein purpura: Fact or fiction? Turk. J. Pediatr. 2012, 54, 194–197. [Google Scholar]
  71. Kanık, A.; Köse, E.; Eliaçık, K.; Şirin Köse, S.; Cefa Arslan, N.; Helvacı, M. Steroid tedavisine hızlı yanıt veren akut skrotum: Bir Henoch Schönlein Purpura olgusu [A rapid response to steroid therapy in acute scrotum: A case of Henoch-Schönlein purpura]. Çocuk Cerrahisi Dergisi 2012, 26, 71–73. [Google Scholar]
  72. Aaron, S.; Al-Watban, L.; Manca, D. Scrotal involvement in an adult with Henoch-Schönlein purpura. Clin. Rheumatol. 2013, 32 (Suppl. 1), S93–S95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Shaher, H.M.; Alzahrani, A.S.; Alshaalan, H.M. Unusual testicular ultrasound findings in a child with Henoch-Schönlein purpura. J. Med. Ultrasound 2013, 21, 217–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Modi, S.; Mohan, M.; Jennings, A. Acute scrotal swelling in Henoch-Schönlein purpura: Case report and review of the literature. Urol. Case Rep. 2016, 6, 9–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Nanbu, A.; Sugiura, K.; Sassa, N.; Akiyama, M. Epididymitis with Epididymal Cyst Indicating Immunoglobulin A Vasculitis in an AdultAi Nanbu, Kazumitsu Sugiura, Naoto Sassa, Masashi Akiyama. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2016, 96, 985–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Oomens, P.; Derix, M.; Fossion, L. Rare urological manifestation of Henoch-Schönlein purpura: Testicular torsion. BMJ Case Rep. 2016, 2016, bcr2016217531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kaminsky, L.W.; Fletcher, J.P.; Aprile, J.M. Case 3: Abdominal pain and epididymitis in an 8-year-old boy. Pediatr. Rev. 2017, 38, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Oral, A.; Ahiskalioglu, E.O.; Yigiter, M.; Sipal, S.; Kantarci, M.; Salman, B.A. An Unusual Complication of Henoch-Schönlein vasculitis in an 11-year-old boy: Global testicular necrosis mimicking testicular torsion. West Indian Med. J. 2017, 66, 372–375. [Google Scholar]
  79. Zhao, L.; Zheng, S.; Ma, X.; Yan, W. Henoch-Schönlein purpura with testicular necrosis: Sonographic findings at the onset, during treatment, and at follow-up. Urology 2017, 107, 223–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Malek, A.; Gomez-Villegas, S.I.; de la Hoz, A.; Nowbakht, C.; Arias, C.A. A 19-year-old man with IgA vasculitis after vaccination. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 22, 442–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lobl, M.B.; LaGrange, C.A.; Trowbridge, R.M. Henoch-Schönlein purpura presenting with bilateral solid testicular masses in an adult. Urology 2020, 136, e26–e29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Ma, Y.; Zhang, S.; Chen, J.; Kong, H.; Diao, J. Henoch-Schönlein purpura with scrotal involvement: A case report and literature review. J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 2021, 43, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Kajitani, S.; Miyamoto, M.; Tokura, Y.; Mizuno, T.; Kambara, T.; Ichikawa, G.; Yoshihara, S. Testicular torsion associated with Henoch-Schönlein purpura. J. Pediatr. 2022, 243, 231–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Turkish, V.J.; Traisman, H.S.; Belman, A.B.; Given, G.Z.; Marr, T.J. Scrotal swelling in the Schönlein-Henoch syndrome. J. Urol. 1976, 115, 317–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Cataldo, F.; Maltese, I.; Gueci, G.; Paternostro, D.; Traverso, G. Sindrome di Schönlein-Henoch con interessamento testicolare: Presentazione di 4 casi [The Schönlein-Henoch syndrome with testicular involvement: A report of 4 cases]. Pediatr. Med. Chir. 1992, 14, 211–213. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. David, S.; Schiff, J.D.; Poppas, D.P. Henoch-Schönlein purpura involving the glans penis. Urology 2003, 61, 1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Demir, T.; Köken, R.; Dogru, Ö.; Karaca, S.; Sen, T.A. Penile involvement in Henoch-Schönlein purpura. Duzce Med. J. 2006, 8, 8–9. [Google Scholar]
  88. Januário, G.; Santiago, F. Case for diagnosis. An. Bras. Dermatol. 2012, 87, 153–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Torun Bayram, M.; Türkmen, M.; Alaygut, D.; Soylu, A.; Kavukçu, S. A case of Henoch-Schönlein purpura with penile skin involvement. Turk. J. Pediatr. Dis. 2012, 6, 40–42. [Google Scholar]
  90. Balevic, S.; Taylor, M.; Amaya, M. Penile and scrotal swelling mimicking child abuse. Clin. Pediatr. 2013, 52, 988–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Verim, L.; Cebeci, F.; Erdem, M.R.; Somay, A. Henoch-Schönlein purpura without systemic involvement beginning with acute scrotum and mimicking torsion of testis. Arch. Ital. Urol. Androl. 2013, 85, 50–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Lim, Y.; Yi, B.H.; Lee, H.K.; Hong, H.S.; Lee, M.H.; Choi, S.Y.; Park, J.O. Henoch-Schönlein purpura: Ultrasonography of scrotal and penile involvement. Ultrasonography 2015, 34, 144–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Tewary, K.K.; Khodaghalian, B.; Narchi, H. Acute penile pain and swelling in a 4-year-old child with Henoch-Schönlein purpura. BMJ Case Rep. 2015, 2015, bcr2013202341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Farkas, N.; Black, J.; Gupta, A. Urinary retention secondary to acute vasculitic penile swelling in a pediatric patient. Clin. Case Rep. 2016, 4, 258–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Hewett, K.M.; Titus, M.O. Acute genitourinary swelling and erythema as presenting symptoms of Henoch-Schönlein purpura. Pediatr. Emerg. Care 2016, 32, 384–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Brodie, A.G.N.; Nitiahpapand, R.; Chowoo, L. Unusual presentation of Henoch-Schönlein purpura. BMJ Case Rep. 2018, 2018, bcr2017220129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Mazzoni, M.B.; Kottanattu, L.; Simonetti, G.D.; Ragazzi, M.; Bianchetti, M.G.; Fossali, E.F.; Milani, G.P. Renal vein obstruction and orthostatic proteinuria: A review. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2011, 26, 562–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Ioannides, A.S.; Turnock, R. An audit of the management of the acute scrotum in children with Henoch-Schönlein purpura. J. R. Coll. Surg. Edinb. 2001, 46, 98–99. [Google Scholar]
  99. Gatti, J.M.; Patrick Murphy, J. Current management of the acute scrotum. Semin. Pediatr. Surg. 2007, 16, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Children 09 01154 g001 550
Figure 1. Involvement of external genitalia in males with Henoch–Schönlein syndrome. Flowchart of the literature search process.
Figure 1. Involvement of external genitalia in males with Henoch–Schönlein syndrome. Flowchart of the literature search process.
Children 09 01154 g001
Children 09 01154 g002 550
Figure 2. Scrotal skin inflammation, epididymitis, orchitis, and funiculitis in males with Henoch–Schönlein syndrome.
Figure 2. Scrotal skin inflammation, epididymitis, orchitis, and funiculitis in males with Henoch–Schönlein syndrome.
Children 09 01154 g002
Children 09 01154 g003 550
Figure 3. Scrotal involvement in Henoch–Schönlein syndrome. (a) Schematic representation of the normal scrotal anatomy: scrotal wall (1), tunica vaginalis (2), testicle (3), epididymis (4), pampiniform plexus (5), spermatic artery (6). (b) Scrotal skin inflammation: bilateral thickening and swelling of the scrotal wall, small bilateral hydroceles, normal testes. (c) Orchitis: increased testicular volume and blood flow, often thickening of the scrotal wall, hydrocele, and funiculitis. (d) Epididymitis: increased epididymal volume and blood flow, often thickening of the scrotal wall, hydrocele, and funiculitis. (e) Primary vascular testicular damage: increased testicular volume, focal or diffuse decrease/absence of testicular blood flow, absent twisting of the spermatic cord. (f) Testicular torsion: twisting of the spermatic cord, redundant spermatic cord in the scrotal sac, rotated testis, increased volume, decrease in/absence of testicular blood flow, sometimes hydrocele and thickening of the scrotal wall.
Figure 3. Scrotal involvement in Henoch–Schönlein syndrome. (a) Schematic representation of the normal scrotal anatomy: scrotal wall (1), tunica vaginalis (2), testicle (3), epididymis (4), pampiniform plexus (5), spermatic artery (6). (b) Scrotal skin inflammation: bilateral thickening and swelling of the scrotal wall, small bilateral hydroceles, normal testes. (c) Orchitis: increased testicular volume and blood flow, often thickening of the scrotal wall, hydrocele, and funiculitis. (d) Epididymitis: increased epididymal volume and blood flow, often thickening of the scrotal wall, hydrocele, and funiculitis. (e) Primary vascular testicular damage: increased testicular volume, focal or diffuse decrease/absence of testicular blood flow, absent twisting of the spermatic cord. (f) Testicular torsion: twisting of the spermatic cord, redundant spermatic cord in the scrotal sac, rotated testis, increased volume, decrease in/absence of testicular blood flow, sometimes hydrocele and thickening of the scrotal wall.
Children 09 01154 g003
Table
Table 1. CAAR grading for Cutaneous, Abdominal, Articular and Renal involvement in Henoch–Schönlein syndrome. The involvement is graded as absent, mild, moderate, or severe [1].
Table 1. CAAR grading for Cutaneous, Abdominal, Articular and Renal involvement in Henoch–Schönlein syndrome. The involvement is graded as absent, mild, moderate, or severe [1].
  • Cutaneous involvementabsent:
    -
    absent: No skin lesions
    -
    mild: Skin lesions located on buttocks and lower extremities alone
    -
    moderate: Skin lesions located on (a) buttocks and lower extremities and (b) either trunk or upper extremities
    -
    severe: Skin lesions located on (a) buttocks and lower extremities, (b) trunk and (c) upper extremities
  • Abdominal involvement
    -
    absent: No symptoms, no findings
    -
    mild: Mild abdominal pain (medically elicited)
    -
    moderate: Moderate abdominal pain (transient complaints brought to medical attention)
    -
    severe: Severe abdominal pain and/or melena, and/or hematemesis, and/or intussusception
  • Articular involvement
    -
    absent: No symptoms, no findings
    -
    mild: Symptoms or findings of articular involvement but no functional abnormalities
    -
    moderate: Symptoms and findings of articular involvement causing mild functional reduction (e.g., limping)
    -
    severe: Symptoms and findings causing moderate functional loss (e.g., inability to walk)
  • Renal involvement
    -
    absent: Normal urinalysis
    -
    mild: Pathological hematuria, normal proteinuria (stick negative or [+])
    -
    moderate: Pathological hematuria, mild-moderate proteinuria (stick + to ++)
    -
    severe: Pathological hematuria, severe proteinuria (stick ≥ +++)
Table
Table 2. Involvement of male external genitalia in Henoch–Schönlein syndrome. Characteristics of the 114 cases (1.5 to 75 years of age).
Table 2. Involvement of male external genitalia in Henoch–Schönlein syndrome. Characteristics of the 114 cases (1.5 to 75 years of age).
All
Cases		Isolated
Penile
Involvement		Isolated Scrotal
Involvement		Penoscrotal Involvementp Value
N114187719
Age
 years5.8 [4.0–8.0]4.9 [3.5–7.5]6.0 [4.0–8.0]5.0 [4.0–5.8]0.0586
 ≤18 years, N1041670190.3600
Precursors 0.5214
 Infection4192111
  Upper respiratory infection, N3361710
  Further infections, N8341
 Vaccine, N1010
 Hymenoptera sting, N1010
Time relationship 0.2144
 Skin before genitalia by ≥3 days *, N5510369
 Skin and genitalia concomitant, N414298
 Genitalia before skin by ≥3 days **, N10091
 Information not available, N8431
CAAR-grading of organ involvement
 Cutaneous involvement 0.8483
  Mild, N73114913
  Moderate, N265183
  Severe, N11263
  Information not available, N4040
 Abdominal involvement <0.03 ◆
  None, N49132610
  Mild, N245145
  Moderate, N200173
  Severe, N190181
  Information not available, N2020
 Articular involvement 0.1647
  None, N455337
  Mild, N5210366
  Moderate, N10235
  Severe, N5131
  Information not available, N2020
 Kidney involvement 0.4818
  None, N73144811
  Mild, N232165
  Moderate, N14293
  Severe, N2020
  Information not available, N2020
* 3–5 days, N = 16; 6–10 days, N = 16; 11–30 days, N = 17; >30 days, N = 6; ** 3–10 days, N = 9; 11–30 days, N = 0; >30 days, N = 1; ◆ penile versus scrotal or penoscrotal involvement.
Table
Table 3. Symptoms and clinical findings of penile involvement in 37 Henoch–Schönlein patients.
Table 3. Symptoms and clinical findings of penile involvement in 37 Henoch–Schönlein patients.
Penile ManifestationsN (%)
Swelling, N26 (70%)
Erythema, N23 (62%)
Purpuric rash, N20 (54%)
Pain, N15 (40%)
Transient micturition disorders, N2 (5%)
Priapism, N2 (5%)
Table
Table 4. Scrotal structures involved in 96 males with Henoch–Schönlein syndrome.
Table 4. Scrotal structures involved in 96 males with Henoch–Schönlein syndrome.
Laterality
Total N = 213Left N = 82Right N = 38Bilateral N = 83Not Specified N = 10
Scrotal skin inflammation, N832210510
Epididymitis, N49266125
Testicular involvement, N391510140
 Orchitis, N30107130
 Ischemic damage, N95310
  Without torsion, N53110
  With torsion, N42200
Spermatic cord involvement, N147502
 Funiculitis, N136502
 Spermatic vein thrombosis, N11000
Hydatid torsion, N33000
Poorly defined intrascrotal inflammation, N134333
Hydrocele, N125430
Table
Table 5. Henoch–Schönlein syndrome with scrotal involvement. History, physical examination, imaging studies, and differential diagnosis.
Table 5. Henoch–Schönlein syndrome with scrotal involvement. History, physical examination, imaging studies, and differential diagnosis.
Imaging Studies
History—ExaminationUltrasoundColor DopplerDifferential Diagnosis
Scrotal skin inflammationErythema (sometimes with purpuric lesions), warmth and swelling (painless or only mildly painful) of the scrotal sac (usually bilateral)Thickening and swelling of the scrotal sac, small bilateral hydroceles, normal testesHypervascularity of the scrotal sac (fountain sign)Acute idiopathic scrotal edema
Orchitis (sometimes associated with epididymitis)Testicular pain, swelling and warmth, often associated with swelling and erythema of the scrotal sac (usually unilateral)Increased testicular volume with focal or diffuse hypoechogenicity, often mild-moderate thickening of the scrotal wall, hydrocele (anechoic or with debris), funiculitisIncreased testicular (and, often, epidydimal) blood flowReperfusion after intermittent torsion
Epididymitis (mostly associated with orchitis)Pain posterior to the testicle, often associated with swelling and erythema of the scrotal sac (usually bilateral)Increased epididymal volume with heterogeneous echogenicity, often mild-moderate thickening of the scrotal wall, hydrocele (anechoic or with debris), funiculitisIncreased epidydimal (and, often, testicular) blood flowReperfusion after intermittent torsion
Primary vascular testicular damageAcute or subacute unilateral testicular pain, testicle usually tender and swollenIncreased testicular volume, focal or diffuse hypoechogenicity, absent twisting of the spermatic cordFocal or diffuse decrease or absence of testicular blood flowFocal post-traumatic infarction (due to increased pressure resulting in venous obstruction)
Testicular torsionAbrupt onset of severe unilateral testicular or scrotal pain—testicle usually tender, swollen, and slightly elevated because of shortening of the cord from twisting—often nausea and vomiting Twisting of the spermatic cord (whirlpool sign), redundant spermatic cord in the scrotal sac, testis rotated with increased volume, heterogeneous hyperechogenicity, sometimes hydrocele (anechoic or with debris) and mild-moderate thickening of the scrotal wall.Diffuse decrease or absence of testicular blood flow (pulsed Doppler: absence or reduced first venous and then arterial blood flow)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Montorfani-Janett, V.M.L.; Montorfani, G.E.; Lavagno, C.; Gualco, G.; Bianchetti, M.G.; Milani, G.P.; Lava, S.A.G.; Cristallo Lacalamita, M. External Male Genitalia in Henoch–Schönlein Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Children 2022, 9, 1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9081154

AMA Style

Montorfani-Janett VML, Montorfani GE, Lavagno C, Gualco G, Bianchetti MG, Milani GP, Lava SAG, Cristallo Lacalamita M. External Male Genitalia in Henoch–Schönlein Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Children. 2022; 9(8):1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9081154

Chicago/Turabian Style

Montorfani-Janett, Valentina M. L., Gabriele E. Montorfani, Camilla Lavagno, Gianluca Gualco, Mario G. Bianchetti, Gregorio P. Milani, Sebastiano A. G. Lava, and Marirosa Cristallo Lacalamita. 2022. "External Male Genitalia in Henoch–Schönlein Syndrome: A Systematic Review" Children 9, no. 8: 1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9081154

APA Style

Montorfani-Janett, V. M. L., Montorfani, G. E., Lavagno, C., Gualco, G., Bianchetti, M. G., Milani, G. P., Lava, S. A. G., & Cristallo Lacalamita, M. (2022). External Male Genitalia in Henoch–Schönlein Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Children, 9(8), 1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9081154

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop