Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Caffeic Acid and Biopesticides Interactions for the Control of Storage Beetles
Previous Article in Journal
Tissue Microarray Lipidomic Imaging Mass Spectrometry Method: Application to the Study of Alcohol-Related White Matter Neurodegeneration
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Biosciences
Volume 2
Issue 2
10.3390/applbiosci2020014
applbiosci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Crossiella, a Rare Actinomycetota Genus, Abundant in the Environment

by
Tamara Martin-Pozas
1,†,
Jose Luis Gonzalez-Pimentel
2,†,
Valme Jurado
3,
Leonila Laiz
3,
Juan Carlos Cañaveras
4,
Angel Fernandez-Cortes
5,
Soledad Cuezva
6,
Sergio Sanchez-Moral
1 and
Cesareo Saiz-Jimenez
3,*
1
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, MNCN-CSIC, 28006 Madrid, Spain
2
Centro Andaluz de Biologia del Desarrollo (CABD, UPO-CSIC-JA), Facultad de Ciencias Experimentales, Departamento de Genetica, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
3
Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiologia, IRNAS-CSIC, 41012 Sevilla, Spain
4
Departamento de Ciencias de la Tierra y del Medio Ambiente, Universidad de Alicante, 03080 Alicante, Spain
5
Departamento de Biologia y Geologia, Universidad de Almeria, 04120 Almeria, Spain
6
Departamento de Geologia, Geografia y Medio Ambiente, Universidad de Alcala, 28802 Alcala de Henares, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Appl. Biosci. 2023, 2(2), 194-210; https://doi.org/10.3390/applbiosci2020014
Submission received: 4 March 2023 / Revised: 24 April 2023 / Accepted: 27 April 2023 / Published: 6 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Applied Biosciences 2023)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The genus Crossiella contains two species, C. equi, causing nocardioform placentitis in horses, and C. cryophila, an environmental bacterium. Apart from C. equi, which is not discussed here, environmental Crossiella is rarely reported in the literature; thus, it has not been included among “rare actinobacteria”, whose isolation frequency is very low. After C. cryophila, only five reports cover the isolation of Crossiella strains. However, the frequency of published papers on environmental Crossiella has increased significantly in recent years due to the extensive use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and a huge cascade of data that has improved our understanding of how bacteria occur in the environment. In the last five years, Crossiella has been found in different environments (caves, soils, plant rhizospheres, building stones, etc.). The high abundance of Crossiella in cave moonmilk indicates that this genus may have an active role in moonmilk formation, as evidenced by the precipitation of calcite, witherite, and struvite in different culture media. This review provides an overview of environmental Crossiella, particularly in caves, and discusses its role in biomineralization processes and bioactive compound production.

1. Introduction

The first strain included in the genus Crossiella has a long history of transfers and amendments. Takahashi et al. [1] studied the soil isolate Nocardiopsis mutabilis, capable of producing novel antibiotics, and classified it as a new subspecies: Nocardiopsis mutabilis subsp. Cryophilis based on its growth at low temperatures (8–33 °C). This strain was subsequently transferred by Labeda and Lechevalier [2] to the genus Saccharothrix as Saccharothrix cryophilis because its morphological and chemotaxonomical properties were more typical of the genus Saccharothrix than Nocardiopsis. In another study, Labeda [3] erected the genus Crossiella to accommodate the species Saccharothrix cryophilis, which was misplaced within the genus Saccharothrix. The genus only contained the species Crossiella cryophila, which was soon accompanied by Crossiella equi, responsible for causing abortion cases in horses with equine nocardioform placentitis in Kentucky [4].
In the last 20 years, no other species of Crossiella have been described, with scarce reports on the isolation of Crossiella strains in the literature. Sánchez-Moral [5] isolated a few strains of Crossiella from Altamira Cave, Spain. Adeyemo and Onilude [6] described a strain of Crossiella isolated from Nigerian soil with a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity. Cimermanova et al. [7] isolated nine actinobacteria collected from different heavy metal-contaminated soils and found that one strain could represent a new species within the genus Crossiella; however, they did not provide any characterization or description other than its position in the phylogenetic tree and that the strain differed from Crossiella cryophila in several biochemical properties. González-Riancho [8] isolated three Crossiella strains from white and grey biofilms from Altamira Cave. Finally, Gonzalez-Pimentel et al. [9] studied the genomes of two Crossiella strains selected from 13 strains previously isolated from Altamira Cave (unpublished report).
The isolation of Crossiella strains on only five occasions in the last 10 years included this genus within the so-called “rare actinobacteria”. Oren and Garrity [10] considered Actinobacteria a synonym of Actinomycetota. They presented the names and formal descriptions of 42 phyla to effect valid publication in their names based on genera as nomenclatural types. However, in this paper, we maintained the original names, as previously published by each author, to avoid mistakes.
“Rare actinobacteria” are non-Streptomyces actinobacteria whose isolation frequency is much lower than Streptomyces strains, commonly isolated by conventional methods [11,12]. Tiwari and Gupta [13,14] reported 120 new genera of “rare actinobacteria” in the first decade of the 21st century. A total of 40 out of 120 genera were isolated from soils with comparatively lower percentages from other environments: marine and freshwater sediments, marine animals, plants, buildings, etc. A few reports included the rare genera Actinomadura, Nonomuraea, Micromonospora, Streptosporangium, Nocardiopsis, and Pseudonocardia as most frequent in diverse environments [15,16,17,18,19,20]. It is noteworthy that an abundance of “rare actinobacteria” is in extreme environments, as exemplified in Atacama [18] and other deserts [21,22,23,24]. However, Crossiella has not been included among “rare actinobacteria” thus far. We have found that Crossiella is an abundant genus in most studied Spanish caves, whether they are gypsum, karstic, or volcanic [9,25,26,27], and in other terrestrial and aquatic environments.
In this paper, we review the occurrence of environmental Crossiella, its relative abundance in Spanish caves and other subterranean environments, as well as its involvement in caves’ mineral precipitation. The interest in Crossiella lies in its role in biomineralization and potential use in biotechnological processes (stone bioconsolidation, enzyme sources, bioactive compounds, etc.).

2. The Genus Crossiella in Caves

Table 1 shows the occurrence of Crossiella in different Spanish caves. The high relative abundance of this genus is in moonmilk (Figure 1), either from karstic (Pindal) or volcanic (Fuente de la Canaria and Bucara II) caves, as well as in coloured biofilms (Pindal, Altamira, Castañar, Covadura) is remarkable [27,28,29,30,31]. The relative humidity is near 100% in these caves. In addition, other mineral/biological formations, such as a pink formation in Bucara II, exhibit high relative abundance (38.9%). Similarly, formations such as mucous formations or brown deposits also reach relatively high abundances (6.7–12.8%) [29]. Interestingly, low percentages of Crossiella found in the sediments under the moonmilk indicate an aerobic behaviour for this genus [3]. Crossiella was also found in phototrophic biofilms from Nerja Cave [30].
Crossiella, at a relative abundance of 15.0%, was found in grey biofilms from Castañar Cave [31]. Similar grey biofilms were observed in Altamira Cave [8] and the Thyssen Museum, reaching a relative abundance of 64.2% [32]. Data from a geomicrobiological study of a Roman nymphaeum located in the archaeological basement of the Thyssen Museum in Malaga, Spain, were also included in Table 1 due to its interest.
The environmental conditions of this archaeological basement are special because they mix the characteristics of an environment heavily influenced by the natural underlying karst system with those of an enclosure located in an urban building. Apart from caves, it was remarkable that a subterranean environment, the Roman mortar pavement in the archaeological basement, was colonized by grey biofilms with a high relative abundance of Crossiella. This environment is characterized by permanent darkness, the absence of visits, and high relative humidity.
Table 1 shows the occurrence of Crossiella in moonmilk, grey, yellow, pink and white biofilms, and sediments from different caves and subterranean environments. Crossiella is abundant in different types of rocks, either in volcanic (Fuente de la Canaria, Bucara II), karstic (Pindal, Nerja, Castañar, Altamira) or gypsum (Covadura, Yeso) caves.
In addition to the studies in Table 1, authors have reported the occurrence of Crossiella using methodological approaches other than NGS. Stomeo et al. [33] found metabolically active Crossiella in white biofilms from Ardales Cave, Malaga, Spain. Portillo and Gonzalez [34] identified Crossiella as a major metabolically active bacterium in the black crust of a shelter located in Aragon, Spain, and Sanchez-Moral [5] reported Crossiella in Altamira Cave.
Table 2 shows the widespread occurrence of Crossiella in caves in the USA, France and China. Less frequent records were found in caves in Italy, Pakistan, Portugal, Serbia, and Thailand, among other countries [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57].
Apart from the high abundance in Spanish caves, the high relative abundance of Crossiella in Italian caves is also remarkable. In this regard, Nicolosi et al. [55] recorded high relative abundances in four Etna volcano caves. One of them ranged from 62.5 to 77.6%. Other notable abundances were found in the salt efflorescences of a French shelter [37] and in caves in the USA [42], France [47], Pakistan [45], and the Azores, Portugal [51].
Crossiella has been identified as one of the dominant bacterial phylotypes, with an increasing prevalence when global humidity conditions rise, in a research covering 1050 cave microbiomes worldwide (manuscript in preparation).

3. Crossiella in the Environment

Supplementary Table S1 lists papers in the literature that use the keyword “Crossiella”, including Crossiella misspelling [58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146]. The occurrence of the genus Crossiella in different environments is significant. Papers reporting Crossiella equi and its involvement in animal diseases [4] were excluded.
The papers listed in Supplementary Table S1 rely on molecular methods, except for five articles describing the properties of isolated strains [5,6,7,8,9]. The genus Crossiella shows a ubiquitous and extensive geographical distribution on all continents, including Antarctica, but not in Australia/Oceania, likely due to a lack of relevant studies.
Fewer reports locate Crossiella in mines and reclaimed mine soils [7,120,121,122,123,124]. However, the number of studies on its presence in soils and the rhizospheres of diverse plants is considerable. Several Crossiella findings in stones and building stones were also confirmed [125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138]. Finally, a few records in sea sediments and freshwaters were significant [139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146] because they included aquatic environments among Crossiella habitats.
From Supplementary Table S1, we can conclude that Crossiella, in addition to caves, is relatively abundant in diverse environments, namely soils, plant rhizospheres, mines, building stones, and other occasional habitats, but is rarely isolated.
Considering the abundance of reports on Crossiella in soils [58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96] and plant rhizospheres [97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119], the presence of this genus in caves and other subterranean environments could be attributed to its transport to the subsurface via percolation waters. In this regard, Crossiella in percentages <1% have been found in drip waters from Pindal Cave [28]. It may be possible that once transported to the caves, the environmental conditions favour and increase the colonization and growth of Crossiella on different mineral substrata.

4. Crossiella Isolates

Only five reports shed light on Crossiella isolates. A screening of Nigerian soils resulted in the isolation of Crossiella sp. strain EK18. The 16S rRNA nucleotide sequence showed 98% similarity to C. equi. This strain grew well in different culture media and exhibited broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity [6]. The authors studied the effects of pH, temperature, carbon and nitrogen sources, sodium chloride concentration, and incubation time on antimicrobial activity. In addition, they reported a list of 12 so-called antimicrobial metabolites, including alkanes, alkenes, commonly synthesized by bacteria, and phthalates, which are contaminants from materials and impurities from products used in culture media. Therefore, no conclusive data on the real bioactive compounds produced by the Crossiella strain can be derived from this study.
Cimermanova et al. [7] isolated Crossiella sp., strain S2, from mining wastes, with a 16rRNA gene sequence similarity of 99.1% to C. cryophila. The authors suggested that it may represent a novel, never described species, based on its location in the phylogenetic tree. The strain also exhibited high heavy metal resistance.
González-Riancho [8] found relative abundances of Crossiella >20% in white, yellow, and grey biofilms from Altamira Cave. She isolated two strains from white and one strain from grey biofilms with similarities of 99.0–100.0 to C. cryophila using the medium Actinomycete Isolation Agar (AIA).
Gonzalez-Pimentel et al. [9] studied two of the thirteen Crossiella strains previously isolated from grey biofilms colonizing Altamira Cave, Spain (unpublished report). In vitro and in silico analyses showed the inhibition of pathogenic bacteria and fungi. The exclusive combination of gene clusters involved in the synthesis of lanthipeptides, lasso peptides, nonribosomal peptides and polyketides indicates that these two strains represent a source of new bioactive compounds. The taxonomical distance of both strains from their closest relative, C. cryophila, suggests that they represent a new species of Crossiella, which will be described in future works.
So far, the low number of isolated Crossiella strains indicates that most of the culture media used are inadequate to reproduce their growth in the laboratory. The environmental conditions of their ecological niche should also be considered when designing specific culture media, which are superior to conventional ones.

5. Biomineralization in Caves Induced by Crossiella

Biomineralization or crystal formation is a general phenomenon caused by soil bacteria, as reported by Boquet et al. [147]. These authors isolated 210 bacteria that could form calcite crystals in a medium with calcium acetate and stated that their occurrence depended on the composition of the medium used.
The role of bacteria in speleogenesis has been discussed for decades. Barton and Northup [148] stated that in the 1960s, a few authors proposed that microbes played a role in forming cave deposits. Banks et al. [149] confirmed the link between calcium metabolism in bacteria and calcification using cave isolates. They suggested that the toxicity of Ca2+ ions to bacteria promoted the need to remove Ca2+ ions from the cell via calcification as a detoxification mechanism.
Further evidence of biomineralization has been reported in recent decades that sheds light on microbially induced mineral precipitation [150,151,152,153]. This precipitation has been attributed to several causes: the modulation of environmental pH, nucleation sites on cell surfaces, or enzymatically driven processes involving carbonic anhydrase, urease, etc. [154].
Grey biofilms from Altamira Cave were studied, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed an abundance of bioinduced calcite crystals in addition to moonmilk [152]. The biofilms mainly comprised Actinomycetota filaments promoting carbon dioxide uptake and formation of calcite deposits. A model for bioinduced calcite formation, supported by scanning and transmission electron microscopy data, was proposed by Cuezva et al. [152].
Apart from the precipitation of calcite by Crossiella, another experiment (Figure 2) with two strains of Crossiella isolated from Altamira Cave [9] revealed that both strains induced the formation of different crystals when incubated in a culture medium with barium acetate, yeast extract, and agar (Ba1). Two crystal types were identified on the plates: witherite (barium carbonate) and struvite (magnesium ammonium phosphate), with distinct abundances that were higher for witherite and scarcer for struvite. Witherite precipitation is due to an abundance of barium in the medium. Occasional struvite crystals can be derived from the amino acids and minor amounts of phosphorus and magnesium in the yeast extract [155].
Baryte (barium sulphate) precipitation by bacteria was previously reported by Joubert et al. [156]. Sanchez-Moral et al. [157] found that baryte was associated with filamentous bacteria in altered volcanic rocks. Agromyces spp., Bacillus spp., Lysobacter spp., Ralstonia sp., Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Streptomyces sp. were isolated from the volcanic rocks and precipitated witherite or calcite/vaterite in media with barium or calcium acetate, respectively. The occurrence of baryte, but not witherite, in volcanic rocks was due to the presence of sulphate ions that easily transform witherite into barite. This transformation was not produced on the Crossiella plates without sulphate ions.
Struvite precipitation is not as widespread as calcite or witherite in bacteria. Sanchez-Moral et al. [158] tested eight bacteria isolated from the Roman catacombs of St. Callixtus and Domitilla and reported that Agromyces ramosus precipitated calcite, magnesium calcite, witherite, and struvite, depending on the media composition. Other bacteria precipitating struvite were Bacillus sp. and Ralstonia metallidurans.
Rivadeneyra et al. [159] found that only 20.8% of the tested bacterial isolates precipitated struvite and that calcium acetate appeared to inhibit struvite precipitation in culture media, whereas ammonium ions triggered it [160]. Manzoor et al. [161] stated that urease-producing bacteria play a key role in struvite precipitation, controlling nucleation, and modulating crystalline phases and crystal shapes. Urease is present in the strain type of Crossiella, C. cryophila [3], and urease genes have been identified in the genomes of the two Crossiella strains from Altamira Cave [9].
Sánchez-Román et al. [162] reported that carbon and phosphorus cycles are interrelated during biomineralization. They also demonstrated the co-precipitation of carbonate and struvite, which we also found in Crossiella strains.
The data reported show that biomineralization by Crossiella is an active process in the presence of different ions, confirming its role in moonmilk formation. Crossiella strains’ ability to induce carbonate precipitation, which is used to consolidate cultural heritage stones and buildings, should be explored.

6. Moonmilk Formation

Moonmilk formation has been discussed in the literature for a long time [150,163,164,165,166,167,168]. The question: Is moonmilk an abiotic process driven physicochemically, or is it biotic, mediated by microorganisms? A biological origin currently prevails; even a combination of physicochemical and biogenic processes is being considered [166]. Cañaveras et al. [150,165] indicated that bacteria influenced the physicochemistry of calcite precipitation. They observed that cave moonmilk comprises a network of calcite crystals and active filamentous bacteria. They also found that hydromagnesite and needle-fibre aragonite deposits were associated with bacteria in Altamira Cave, predominantly Streptomyces, for which they demonstrated their ability to precipitate calcite/vaterite in the laboratory. The association between bacteria and mineral crystals was reported in other papers and described using SEM [152,153,165,168,169,170]. In addition, different bacterial genera such as Agromyces, Amycolatopsis, Brachybacterium, Nocardioides, Nocardiopsis, Paenibacillus, and Rothia precipitated vaterite/calcite and Mg-calcite [171].
Maciejewska et al. [153] found that all the Streptomyces strains tested could promote calcification and biomineralization. The metabolic activities involved in the precipitation were amino acids ammonification and ureolysis, which increased environmental pH. Sanchez-Moral et al. [169] stated that microbial activity induces carbonate precipitation in the early stages of deposition. However, as carbonate accumulates, a progressive decline in microbial activity occurs, as deduced from the RNA/DNA ratio, which is used as a marker of metabolic activity. The decreased metabolic activity is due to the progressive accumulation of carbonate and bacterial entrapment in mineral deposits.
The high relative abundance of Crossiella in moonmilk from different caves indicates that this genus is active in moonmilk formation (Table 1). Enzymatic processes induce this mineralization, and several enzymes have been linked to Crossiella activity in moonmilk. Martin-Pozas et al. [26] suggested that moonmilk formation is related to syntrophic relationships between Crossiella and nitrifying bacteria, and Cuezva et al. [27] associated Crossiella with the ability to capture CO2 from the atmosphere and precipitate calcium carbonate as a by-product of carbonic anhydrase action, as observed in cave moonmilk.

7. Is Moonmilk a Source of Bioactive Compounds?

Caves and moonmilk are colonized by complex bacterial communities. Maciejewska et al. [153] reported that Proteobacteria was the dominant phylum of moonmilk from a Belgian cave, followed by Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, Nitrospirae, Gemmatimonadetes, and Planctomycetes. These seven phyla accounted for 85.8–90.2% of the total community. Martin-Pozas et al. [26] investigated the moonmilk composition from Pindal Cave in Spain. They found that Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria dominated the community with over 30% of relative abundance for each phyla, followed by Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, Planctomycetes, Gemmatimonadetes, and Nitrospirae. These phyla accounted for 93.1–93.9% of the total community. The similarities between the phyla compositions of moonmilk from two different caves are remarkable. Moonmilk from a geographically distant cave [172] and another subterranean environment [173] also showed relatively similar phyla compositions.
Moonmilk has been a promising reservoir for novel bacteria producing bioactive compounds, and a few novel species have been isolated, namely Streptomyces lunaelactis [174], Pseudomonas karstica, and Pseudomonas spelaei [175]. Several studies have stressed the great diversity of unknown bacteria inhabiting moonmilk and the isolates’ production of bioactive compounds [176,177,178].
The high abundance of Actinomycetota (=Actinobacteria) and Pseudomonadota (=Proteobacteria) in moonmilk has prompted researchers to test a series of strategies to isolate hard-to-culture “rare actinobacteria” and discover novel bioactive compounds [13,14]. Adam et al. [176] obtained 40 isolates represented by Agromyces, Amycolatopsis, Kocuria, Micrococcus, Micromonospora, Nocardia, Streptomyces, and Rhodococcus species. Streptomyces isolates displayed strong inhibitory activities against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and fungi [177,178,179]. Genome mining of Streptomyces lunaelactis revealed 42 biosynthetic gene clusters [180] and the production of the antibiotics bagremycins and lunaemycins [180,181]. The genome of Crossiella, abundant in moonmilk [26], showed the presence of a combination of gene clusters involved in synthesising different bioactive compounds [9]. The data suggest the possibility of finding other moonmilk bacteria involved in synthesising bioactive compounds.

8. Conclusions

The genus Crossiella is widely distributed in all environments, reaching a relative abundance of up to 78% in a Sicilian cave. Its occurrence in soils, plant rhizospheres and caves is especially important. The last case is probably due to its transport to the subsurface by percolating waters. Despite this abundance, the strains isolated were scarce.
The data suggest that more environmental Crossiella species are waiting to be described, apart from Crossiella cryophila and Crossiella equi. The increasing number of metagenomic sequence data from all environments offers clear opportunities to guide the isolation and cultivation of Crossiella. Therefore, further efforts are required to design suitable isolation culture media. They should consider the environmental conditions of the niches where Crossiella thrives, namely alkaline pH and high mineral concentrations.
Crossiella has an important role in carbon sequestration in subterranean environments. Metagenomic studies and isolating more Crossiella strains and/or species are the only way to advance knowledge of Crossiella functions in different ecosystems. Furthermore, its role in biomineralization and moonmilk formation is also apparent.
Finally, Crossiella appears to be a promising source of active compounds, and the isolated strains deserve more attention regarding their potential use in biotechnological processes.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/applbiosci2020014/s1, Table S1: Occurrence of the genus Crossiella in different environments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.S.-J. and S.S.-M.; investigation, T.M.-P., J.L.G.-P., V.J., L.L., J.C.C., A.F.-C. and S.C.; writing—original draft preparation, C.S.-J., S.S.-M. and T.M.-P.; writing—review and editing, C.S.-J. and S.S.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the projects PID2020-114978GB-I00 and PID2019-110603RB-I00. The Malaga City Council financed data from the archaeological basement of the Thyssen Museum of Malaga through a conservation contract for this Roman site.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data reported in this review can be found in the relevant papers cited. Scanning electron micrographs, EDX spectra, and unpublished data are available on request from Sergio Sanchez-Moral.

Acknowledgments

This is a contribution from CSIC Interdisciplinary Thematic Platform Open Heritage: Research and Society (PTI-PAIS).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Takahashi, A.; Hotta, K.; Saito, N.; Morioka, M.; Okami, Y.; Umezawa, H. Production of novel antibiotic, dopsisamine, by a new subspecies of Nocardiopsis mutabilis with multiple antibiotic resistance. J. Antibiot. 1986, 39, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Labeda, D.P.; Lechevalier, M.P. Amendment of the genus Saccharothrix Labeda et al. 1984 and descriptions of Saccharothrix espanaensis sp. nov., Saccharothrix cryophilis sp. nov., and Saccharothrix mutabilis comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1989, 39, 420–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Labeda, D.P. Crossiella gen. nov., a new genus related to Streptoalloteichus. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2001, 51, 575–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Donahue, J.M.; Williams, N.M.; Sells, S.F.; Labeda, D.P. Crossiella equi sp. nov., isolated from equine placentas. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2002, 52, 2169–2173. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sánchez-Moral, S. Estudio Integral del Estado de Conservación de la Cueva de Altamira y su Arte Paleolítico (2007–2009). Perspectivas Futuras de Conservación; Monografías N° 24; Museo Nacional y Centro de Investigación de Altamira: Santillana del Mar, Spain, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  6. Adeyemo, O.M.; Onilude, A.A. Antimicrobial potential of a rare actinomycete isolated from soil: Crossiella sp.-EK18. J. Adv. Microbiol. 2018, 11, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cimermanova, M.; Pristas, P.; Piknova, M. Biodiversity of actinomycetes from heavy metal contaminated technosols. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. González-Riancho Fernández, C. Análisis Descriptivo y Funcional de Las Colonias Microbianas Visibles Que Crecen en la Cueva de Altamira, Enfocado al Diseño de Medidas de Control. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gonzalez-Pimentel, J.L.; Dominguez-Moñino, I.; Jurado, V.; Laiz, L.; Caldeira, A.T.; Saiz-Jimenez, C. The rare actinobacterium Crossiella sp. is a potential source of new bioactive compounds with activity against bacteria and fungi. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Oren, A.; Garrity, G.M. Valid publication of the names of forty-two phyla of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2021, 71, 005056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Berdy, J. Bioactive microbial metabolites. J. Antibiot. 2005, 58, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Subramani, R.; Aalbersberg, W. Culturable rare Actinomycetes: Diversity, isolation and marine natural product discovery. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 9291–9321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tiwari, K.; Gupta, R.K. Rare actinomycetes: A potential storehouse for novel antibiotics. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2012, 32, 108–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tiwari, K.; Gupta, R.K. Diversity and isolation of rare actinomycetes: An overview. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 39, 256–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Seong, C.N.; Choi, J.H.; Baik, K.-S. An improved selective isolation of rare actinomycetes from forest soil. J. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 17–23. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bredholdt, H.; Galatenko, O.A.; Engelhardt, K.; Fjærvik, E.; Terekhova, L.P.; Zotchev, S.B. Rare actinomycete bacteria from the shallow water sediments of the Trondheim Fjord, Norway: Isolation, diversity and biological activity. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 9, 2756–2764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fang, B.-Z.; Salam, N.; Han, M.-X.; Jiao, J.-Y.; Cheng, J.; Wei, D.-Q.; Xiao, M.; Li, W.-J. Insights on the effects of heat pretreatment, pH, and calcium salts on isolation of rare actinobacteria from karstic caves. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Goodfellow, M.; Nouioui, I.; Sanderson, R.; Xie, F.; Bull, A.T. Rare taxa and dark microbial matter: Novel bioactive actinobacteria abound in Atacama Desert soils. Anton. Leeuw. 2018, 111, 1315–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Benhadj, M.; Gacemi-Kirane, D.; Menasria, T.; Guebla, K.; Ahmane, Z. Screening of rare actinomycetes isolated from natural wetland ecosystem (Fetzara Lake, northeastern Algeria) for hydrolytic enzymes and antimicrobial activities. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2019, 31, 706–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zamora-Quintero, A.Y.; Torres-Beltrán, M.; Guillén Matus, D.G.; Oroz-Parra, I.; Millán-Aguiñaga, N. Rare actinobacteria isolated from the hypersaline Ojo de Liebre Lagoon as a source of novel bioactive compounds with biotechnological potential. Microbiology 2022, 168, 001144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tiwari, K.; Upadhyay, D.J.; Mösker, E.; Süssmuth, R.; Gupta, R.K. Culturable bioactive actinomycetes from the Great Indian Thar Desert. Ann. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 1901–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mohammadipanah, F.; Wink, J. Actinobacteria from arid and desert habitats: Diversity and biological activity. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 6, 1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gacem, M.A.; Ould-El-Hadj-Kheli, A.; Abd-Elsalam, K.A.; Wink, J. Actinobacteria in the Algerian Sahara: Diversity, adaptation mechanism and special unexploited biotopes for the isolation of novel rare taxa. Biologia 2001, 76, 3787–3799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hui, M.L.-Y.; Tan, L.T.-H.; Letchumanan, V.; He, Y.-W.; Fang, C.-M.; Chan, K.-G.; Law, J.W.-F.; Lee, L.-H. The extremophilic Actinobacteria: From microbes to medicine. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gonzalez-Pimentel, J.L.; Martin-Pozas, T.; Jurado, V.; Miller, A.Z.; Caldeira, A.T.; Fernandez-Lorenzo, O.; Sanchez-Moral, S.; Saiz-Jimenez, C. Prokaryotic communities from a lava tube cave in La Palma Island (Spain) are involved in the biogeochemical cycle of major elements. PeerJ 2021, 9, e11386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Martin-Pozas, T.; Cuezva, S.; Fernandez-Cortes, A.; Cañaveras, J.C.; Benavente, D.; Jurado, V.; Saiz-Jimenez, C.; Janssens, I.; Seijas, N.; Sanchez-Moral, S. Role of subterranean microbiota in the carbon cycle and greenhouse gas dynamics. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 831, 154921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cuezva, S.; Martin-Pozas, T.; Fernandez-Cortes, A.; Cañaveras, J.C.; Janssens, I.; Sanchez-Moral, S. On the role of cave-soil in the carbon cycle. A first approach. EGU Gen. Assem. 2020. Available online: https://presentations.copernicus.org/EGU2020/EGU2020-21793_presentation.pdf. (accessed on 22 April 2022).
  28. Martin-Pozas, T.; Fernandez-Cortes, A.; Cuezva, S.; Cañaveras, J.C.; Benavente, D.; Duarte, E.; Saiz-Jimenez, C.; Sanchez-Moral, S. New insights into the structure, microbial diversity and ecology of yellow biofilms in a Paleolithic rock art cave (Pindal Cave, Asturias, Spain). Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 882. in press. [Google Scholar]
  29. González-Pimentel, J.L. Microorganismos de las Cuevas Volcánicas de La Palma (Islas Canarias). Diversidad y Potencial Uso Biotecnológico. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Pablo Olavide, Sevilla, Spain, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  30. Jurado, V.; del Rosal, Y.; Gonzalez-Pimentel, J.L.; Hermosin, B.; Saiz-Jimenez, C. Biological control of phototrophic biofilms in a show cave: The case of Nerja Cave. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Martin-Pozas, T. Papel de los Microorganismos en Procesos de Captación y Emisión de Gases de Efecto Invernadero en Ambientes Subterráneos. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sánchez-Moral, S.; Martín-Pozas, T.; Seijas Morales, N.; Fernández-Cortés, A.; Benavente García, D.; Cañaveras Jiménez, J.C.; Cuezva, S. Instalación de Sensores en Sótano Arqueológico del Museo Carmen Thyssen de Málaga Para la Toma de Datos, el Análisis y Adopción de Medidas Correctoras del Deterioro Del Recinto; Unpublished Report; MNCN: Madrid, Spain, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  33. Stomeo, F.; Portillo, M.C.; Gonzalez, J.M.; Laiz, L.; Saiz-Jimenez, C. Pseudonocardia in white colonizations in two caves with Paleolithic paintings. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2008, 62, 483–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Portillo, M.C.; Gonzalez, J.M. Microbial community diversity and the complexity of preserving cultural heritage. In Biocolonization of Stone: Control and Preventive Methods; Charola, A.E., McNamara, C., Koestler, R.J., Eds.; Smithsonian Institution, Scholarly Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011; pp. 19–28. [Google Scholar]
  35. Yun, Y.; Wang, H.; Man, B.; Xiang, X.; Zhou, J.; Qiu, X.; Duan, Y.; Engel, A.S. The relationship between ph and bacterial communities in a single karst ecosystem and its implication for soil acidification. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lepinay, C.; Mihajlovski, A.; Seyer, D.; Touron, S.; Bousta, F.; Di Martino, P. Biofilm communities survey at the areas of salt crystallization on the walls of a decorated shelter listed at UNESCO World cultural Heritage. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2017, 122, 116–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lepinay, C.; Mihajlovski, A.; Touron, S.; Seyer, D.; Bousta, F.; Di Martino, P. Bacterial diversity associated with saline efflorescences damaging the walls of a French decorated prehistoric cave registered as a World Cultural Heritage Site. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2018, 130, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Alonso, L.; Pommier, T.; Kaufmann, B.; Dubost, A.; Chapulliot, D.; Doré, J.; Douady, C.J.; Moënne-Loccoz, Y. Anthropization level of Lascaux Cave microbiome shown by regional-scale comparisons of pristine and anthropized caves. Mol. Ecol. 2019, 28, 3383–3394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Li, M.; Fang, C.; Kawasaki, S.; Huang, M.; Achal, V. Bio-consolidation of cracks in masonry cement mortars by Acinetobacter sp. SC4 isolated from a karst cave. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2019, 141, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Long, Y.; Jiang, J.; Hu, X.; Zhou, J.; Hu, J.; Zhou, S. Actinobacterial community in Shuanghe Cave using culture-dependent and -independent approaches. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 35, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wiseschart, A.; Mhuantong, W.; Tangphatsornruang, S.; Chantasingh, D.; Pootanakit, K. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing from Manao-Pee cave, Thailand, reveals insight into the microbial community structure and its metabolic potential. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Frazier, V.E. Carbon Metabolism in Cave Subaerial Biofilms. Master’s Thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  43. He, D.; Wu, F.; Ma, W.; Zhang, Y.; Gu, J.-D.; Duan, Y.; Xu, R.; Feng, H.; Wang, W.; Li, S.-W. Insights into the bacterial and fungal communities and microbiome that causes a microbe outbreak on ancient wall paintings in the Maijishan Grottoes. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2021, 163, 105250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ma, L.; Huang, X.; Wang, H.; Yun, Y.; Cheng, X.; Liu, D.; Lu, X.; Qiu, X. Microbial interactions drive distinct taxonomic and potential metabolic responses to habitats in karst cave ecosystem. Microbiol. Spect. 2021, 9, e01152-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zada, S.; Xie, J.; Yang, M.; Yang, X.; Sajjad, W.; Rafiq, M.; Hasan, F.; Hu, Z.; Wang, H. Composition and functional profiles of microbial communities in two geochemically and mineralogically different caves. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 8921–8936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ai, J.; Guo, J.; Li, Y.; Zhong, X.; Lv, Y.; Li, J.; Yang, A. The diversity of microbes and prediction of their functions in karst caves under the influence of human tourism activities—A case study of Zhijin Cave in Southwest China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 25858–25868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Buresova-Faitova, A.; Kopecky, J.; Sagova-Mareckova, M.; Alonso, L.; Vautrin, F.; Moënne-Loccoz, Y.; Rodriguez-Nava, V. Comparison of Actinobacteria communities from human-impacted and pristine karst caves. MicrobiologyOpen 2022, 11, e1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Djebaili, R.; Mignini, A.; Vaccarelli, I.; Pellegrini, M.; Spera, D.M.; Del Gallo, M.; D’Alessandro, A.M. Polyhydroxybutyrate-producing cyanobacteria from lampenflora: The case study of the “Stiffe” caves in Italy. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 933398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cheng, X.; Xiang, X.; Yun, Y.; Wang, W.; Wang, H.; Bodelier, P.L.E. Archaea and their interactions with bacteria in a karst ecosystem. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1068595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Dimkic, I.; Copic, M.; Petrovic, M.; Stupar, M.; Savkovic, Ž.; Kneževic, A.; Simic, G.S.; Grbic, M.L.; Unkovic, N. Bacteriobiota of the cave church of Sts. Peter and Paul in Serbia—Culturable and non-culturable communities’ assessment in the bioconservation potential of a peculiar fresco painting. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Riquelme, C.; Rigal, F.; Hathaway, J.J.M.; Northup, D.E.; Spilde, M.N.; Borges, P.A.V.; Gabriel, R.; Amorin, I.R.; Dapkevicius, M.L.N.E. Cave microbial community composition in oceanic islands: Disentangling the effect of different colored mats in diversity patterns of Azorean lava caves. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2015, 91, fiv141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Spilde, M.N.; Northup, D.E.; Caimi, N.A.; Boston, P.J.; Stone, F.D.; Smith, S. Microbial mat communities in Hawaiian lava caves. Int. Symp. Vulcanospeleol. 2016. Available online: https://www.cavepics.com/IVS17/SPILDE.pdf. (accessed on 29 October 2022).
  53. Lavoie, K.H.; Winter, A.S.; Read, K.J.H.; Hughes, E.M.; Spilde, M.N.; Northup, D.E. Comparison of bacterial communities from lava cave microbial mats to overlying surface soils from Lava Beds National Monument, USA. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0169339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Weng, M.M.; Zaikova, E.; Millan, M.; Williams, A.J.; McAdam, A.C.; Knudson, C.A.; Fuqua, S.R.; Wagner, N.Y.; Craft, K.; Nawotniak, S.K.; et al. Life underground: Investigating microbial communities and their biomarkers in Mars-analog lava tubes at Craters of the Moon National Monument and Preserve. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 2022, 127, e2022JE007268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nicolosi, G.; Gonzalez-Pimentel, J.L.; Piano, E.; Isaia, M.; Miller, A.Z. First insights into the bacterial diversity of Mount Etna volcanic caves. Microb. Ecol. 2023, 85. in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Barton, H.A.; Taylor, N.M.; Kreate, M.P.; Springer, A.C.; Oehrle, S.A.; Bertog, J.L. The impact of host rock geochemistry on bacterial community structure in oligotrophic cave environments. Int. J. Speleol. 2007, 36, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ghezzi, D.; Sauro, F.; Columbu, A.; Carbone, C.; Hong, P.-Y.; Vergara, F.; De Waele, J.; Cappelletti, M. Transition from unclassified Ktedonobacterales to Actinobacteria during amorphous silica precipitation in a quartzite cave environment. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Weber, C.F. Reduced vertical stratification of soil bacterial community structure and composition is associated with Bromus tectorum invasion of sagebrush steppe. J. Arid Environ. 2015, 115, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Osman, J.R.; Fernandes, G.; Regeard, C.; Jaubert, C.; DuBow, M.S. Examination of the bacterial biodiversity of coastal eroded surface soils from the Padza de Dapani (Mayotte Island). Geomicrobiol. J. 2018, 35, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lambrechts, S.; Willems, A.; Tahon, G. Uncovering the uncultivated majority in Antarctic soils: Toward a synergistic approach. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, J.; Wu, Z.; Yuan, J. Impact of agro-farming activities on microbial diversity of acidic red soils in a Camellia Oleifera Forest. Rev. Bras. Cien. Solo 2019, 43, e0190044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhenqing, Z.; Binglin, Z.; Wei, Z.; Guangxiu, L.; Tuo, C.; Yang, L.; Jingwei, C.; Mao, T. Distribution characteristics and anti-radiation activity of culturable bacteria in black gobi ecosystem of the Hexi Corridor. J. Desert Res. 2020, 40, 52–62. [Google Scholar]
  63. Bossolani, J.; Crusciol, C.A.C.; Leite, M.F.A.; Merloti, L.F.; Moretti, L.G.; Pascoaloto, I.M.; Kuramae, E.E. Modulation of the soil microbiome by long-term Ca-based soil amendments boosts soil organic carbon and physicochemical quality in a tropical no-till crop rotation system. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2021, 156, 108188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chen, B.; Jiao, S.; Luo, S.; Ma, B.; Qi, W.; Cao, C.; Zhao, Z.; Du, G.; Ma, X. High soil pH enhances the network interactions among bacterial and archaeal microbiota in alpine grasslands of the Tibetan Plateau. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 23, 464–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liu, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yin, R.; Wu, G.-L. Bacterial contributions of bio-crusts and litter crusts to nutrient cycling in the Mu Us Sandy Land. Catena 2021, 199, 105090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Liu, Z.; Yang, Y.; Ji, S.; Dong, D.; Li, Y.; Wang, M.; Han, L.; Chen, X. Effects of elevation and distance from highway on the abundance and community structure of bacteria in soil along Qinghai-Tibet highway. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 13137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Schulze-Makuch, D.; Lipus, D.; Arens, F.L.; Baqué, M.; Bornemann, T.L.V.; de Vera, J.-P.; Flury, M.; Frösler, J.; Heinz, J.; Hwang, Y.; et al. Microbial hotspots in lithic microhabitats inferred from DNA fractionation and metagenomics in the Atacama Desert. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Xie, J.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Peng, T.; Yang, C.; Zhang, J.; Liang, J. Diversity and structural characteristics of soil microbial communities in different habitats of wild Lilium regale Wilson in Wenchuan area. Bioengineered 2021, 12, 10457–10469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Benaud, N.; Chelliah, D.S.; Wong, S.Y.; Ferrari, B.C. Soil substrate culturing approaches recover diverse members of Actinomycetota from desert soils of Herring Island, East Antarctica. Extremophiles 2022, 26, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Guerra, V.A.; Beule, L.; Mackowiak, C.L.; Dubeux, J.C.B., Jr.; Blount, A.R.S.; Wang, X.-B.; Rowland, D.L.; Liao, H.-L. Soil bacterial community response to rhizoma peanut incorporation into Florida pastures. J. Environ. Qual. 2022, 51, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Ke, M.; Xu, N.; Zhang, Z.; Qiu, D.; Kang, J.; Lu, T.; Wang, T.; Peijnenburg, W.J.G.M.; Sun, L.; Hu, B.; et al. Development of a machine-learning model to identify the impacts of pesticides characteristics on soil microbial communities from high-throughput sequencing data. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 24, 5561–5573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sun, H.; Zhang, H. Alien species invasion of deep-sea bacteria into terrestrial soil. J. Clean. Product. 2022, 371, 133662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sun, H.; Peng, Q.; Guo, J.; Zhang, H.; Bai, J.; Mao, H. Effects of short-term soil exposure of different doses of ZnO nanoparticles on the soil environment and the growth and nitrogen fixation of alfalfa. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 309, 119817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Topalovic, O.; Santos, S.S.; Heuer, H.; Nesme, J.; Kanfra, X.; Hallmann, J.; Sørensen, S.J.; Vestergård, M. Deciphering bacteria associated with a pre-parasitic stage of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne hapla in nemato-suppressive and nemato-conducive soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2022, 172, 104344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, L.; Peng, C.; Gong, B.; Yang, Z.; Song, J.; Li, L.; Xu, L.; Yue, T.; Wang, X.; Yang, M.; et al. Actinobacteria community and their antibacterial and cytotoxic activity on the Weizhou and Xieyang volcanic islands in the Beibu Gulf of China. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 911408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Feng, Z.; Sun, H.; Qin, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, H.; Yao, Q. A synthetic community of siderophore-producing bacteria increases soil selenium bioavailability and plant uptake through regulation of the soil microbiome. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 871, 162076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Conte, A. Phylogenetic Diversity and Metabolic Potential of Prokaryotic Communities in Permafrost and Brine Pockets of Perennially Frozen Antarctic Lakes (Northern Victoria Land). Ph.D. Thesis, Università Degli Studi di Messina, Messina, Italy, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  78. Perez-Mon, C.; Stierli, B.; Plötze, M.; Frey, B. Fast and persistent responses of alpine permafrost microbial communities to in situ warming. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 807, 150720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Narendrula, R. Biochemical and Molecular Characterization of Microbial Communities from a Metal Contaminated and Reclaimed Region. Ph.D. Thesis, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  80. Lin, J.; He, F.; Su, B.; Sun, M.; Owens, G.; Chen, Z. The stabilizing mechanism of cadmium in contaminated soil using green synthesized iron oxide nanoparticles under long-term incubation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 379, 120832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Dong, S.; Liu, S.; Cui, S.; Zhou, X.; Gao, Q. Responses of soil properties and bacterial community to the application of sulfur fertilizers in black and sandy soils. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2022, 31, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Pu, C.; Liu, H.; Ding, G.; Sun, Y.; Yu, X.; Chen, J.; Ren, J.; Gong, X. Impact of direct application of biogas slurry and residue in fields: In situ analysis of antibiotic resistance genes from pig manure to fields. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 344, 441–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Deng, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yin, Y.; Zhu, X.; Zhu, W.; Zhou, Y. Comparison of soil bacterial community and functional characteristics following afforestation in the semi-arid areas. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Deng, J.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, W.; Yin, Y. Effects of afforestation with Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantations combined with enclosure management on soil microbial community. PeerJ 2020, 8, e8857. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  85. Liu, K.; Ding, X.; Wang, J. Soil metabolome correlates with bacterial diversity and co-occurrence patterns in root-associated soils on the Tibetan Plateau. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 735, 139572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Jiang, H.; Chen, Y.; Hu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Lu, X. Soil bacterial communities and diversity in alpine grasslands on the Tibetan Plateau based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 9, 630722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Solon, A.J.; Mastrangelo, C.; Vimercati, L.; Sommers, P.; Darcy, J.L.; Gendron, E.M.S.; Porazinska, D.L.; Schmidt, S.K. Gullies and moraines are islands of biodiversity in an arid, mountain landscape, Asgard Range, Antarctica. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 654135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Rodríguez-Berbel, N.; Ortega, R.; Lucas-Borja, M.E.; Solé-Benet, A.; Miralles, I. Long-term effects of two organic amendments on bacterial communities of calcareous mediterranean soils degraded by mining. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 271, 110920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Chuvochina, M.S.; Alekhina, I.A.; Normand, P.; Petit, J.-R.; Bulat, S.A. Three events of Saharan dust deposition on the Mont Blanc glacier associated with different snow-colonizing bacterial phylotypes. Microbiology 2011, 80, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hui, N.; Sun, N.; Du, H.; Umair, M.; Kang, H.; Liu, X.; Romantschuk, M.; Liu, C. Karst rocky desertification does not erode ectomycorrhizal fungal species richness but alters microbial community structure. Plant Soil 2019, 445, 383–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Reverdy, A.; Hathaway, D.; Jha, J.; Michaels, G.; Sullivan, J.; Diaz Mac-Adoo, D.; Riquelme, C.; Chai, Y.; Godoy, V.G. Insights into the diversity and survival strategies of soil bacterial isolates from the Atacama Desert. bioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Biderre-Petit, C.; Hochart, C.; Gardon, H.; Dugat-Bony, E.; Terrat, S.; Jouan-Dufournel, I.; Paris, R. Analysis of bacterial and archaeal communities associated with Fogo volcanic soils of different ages. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2020, 96, fiaa104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Zhang, X.; Du, W.; Xu, Y.; Wang, Y.L. Soil bacterial diversity and function in semi-arid forest parks in Baotou City. Biodivers. Sci. 2022, 30, 22245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Li, Y.; Gao, W.; Wang, C.; Gao, M. Distinct distribution patterns and functional potentials of rare and abundant microorganisms between plastisphere and soils. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 873, 162413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhang, S.; Pei, L.; Zhao, Y.; Shan, J.; Zheng, X.; Xu, G.; Sun, Y.; Wang, F. Effects of microplastics and nitrogen deposition on soil multifunctionality, particularly C and N cycling. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 451, 131152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Lin, Y.; Yang, L.; Chen, Z.; Gao, Y.; Kong, J.; He, Q.; Su, Y.; Li, J.; Qiu, Q. Seasonal variations of soil bacterial and fungal communities in a subtropical Eucalyptus plantation and their responses to throughfall reduction. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1113616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. De Tender, C.; Haegeman, A.; Vandecasteele, B.; Clement, L.; Cremelie, P.; Dawyndt, P.; Maes, M.; Debode, J. Dynamics in the strawberry rhizosphere microbiome in response to biochar and Botrytis cinerea leaf infection. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Echeverría Molinar, A. Efecto de Factores Abióticos y Bióticos Sobre la Estructura de la Comunidad Microbiana del Suelo en un Ambiente Oligotrófico. Master’s Thesis, Instituto Potosino de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica, San Luis Potosí, México, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  99. Visioli, G.; Sanangelantoni, A.M.; Vamerali, T.; Dal Cortivo, C.; Blandino, M. 16S rDNA profiling to reveal the influence of seed-applied biostimulants on the rhizosphere of young maize plants. Molecules 2018, 23, 1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Gao, X.; Wu, Z.; Liu, R.; Wu, J.; Zeng, Q.; Qi, Y. Rhizosphere bacterial community characteristics over different years of sugarcane ratooning in consecutive monoculture. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 4943150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Chen, Y.; Tian, W.; Shao, Y.; Li, Y.-J.; Lin, L.-A.; Zhang, Y.-J.; Han, H.; Chen, Z.-J. Miscanthus cultivation shapes rhizosphere microbial community structure and function as assessed by Illumina MiSeq sequencing combined with PICRUSt and FUNGUIld analyses. Arch. Microbiol. 2020, 202, 1157–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. López-Lozano, N.E.; Echeverría Molinar, A.; Ortiz Durán, E.A.; Hernández Rosales, M.; Souza, V. Bacterial diversity and interaction networks of Agave lechuguilla rhizosphere differ significantly from bulk soil in the oligotrophic basin of Cuatro Cienegas. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Monteiro, L.C.P. Comunidades Microbianas Rizosféricas de Plantas em Coexistência Sob Diferentes Condições Edáficas. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brasil, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  104. Bettermann, A.; Zethof, J.H.T.; Babin, D.; Cammeraat, L.H.; Solé-Benet, A.; Lázaro, R.; Luna, L.; Nesme, J.; Sorensen, S.J.; Kalbitz, K.; et al. Importance of microbial communities at the root-soil interface for extracellular polymeric substances and soil aggregation in semiarid grasslands. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2021, 159, 108301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Deng, Q.; Zhang, T.; Xie, D.; Yang, Y. Rhizosphere microbial communities are significantly affected by optimized phosphorus management in a slope farming system. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 739844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Engelbrecht, G.; Claassens, S.; Mienie, C.M.S.; Fourie, H. Screening of rhizosphere bacteria and nematode populations associated with soybean roots in the Mpumalanga Highveld of South Africa. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Li, C.; Chen, G.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, P.; Bai, X.; Hou, Y.; Zhang, X. The comprehensive changes in soil properties are continuous cropping obstacles associated with American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) cultivation. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 5068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ye, F.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Wu, S.; Wu, J.; Hong, Y. Different pioneer plant species have similar rhizosphere microbial communities. Plant Soil 2021, 464, 165–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Zuo, J.; Zu, M.; Liu, L.; Song, X.; Yuan, Y. Composition and diversity of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere of the Chinese medicinal herb Dendrobium. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Gu, Y.-Y.; Zhang, H.-Y.; Liang, X.-Y.; Fu, R.; Li, M.; Chen, C.-J. Impact of biochar and bioorganic fertilizer on rhizosphere bacteria in saline–alkali soil. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. He, C.; Wang, R.; Ding, W.; Li, Y. Effects of cultivation soils and ages on microbiome in the rhizosphere soil of Panax ginseng. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2022, 174, 104397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Jara-Servin, A.; Silva, A.; Barajas, H.; Cruz-Ortega, R.; Tinoco-Ojanguren, C.; Alcaraz, L.D. The Allelopathic Buffelgrass and Its Rhizosphere Microbiome. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4263505 (accessed on 28 February 2023).
  113. Kushwaha, P.; Neilson, J.W.; Maier, R.M.; Babst-Kostecka, A. Soil microbial community and abiotic soil properties influence Zn and Cd hyperaccumulation differently in Arabidopsis halleri. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 803, 150006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Lin, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liang, X.; Duan, R.; Yang, L.; Du, Y.; Wu, L.; Huang, J.; Xiang, G.; Bai, J.; et al. Assessment of rhizosphere bacterial diversity and composition in a metal hyperaccumulator (Boehmeria nivea) and a nonaccumulator (Artemisia annua) in an antimony mine. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 132, 3432–3443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Lizano-Bastardín, A.L.; Villadas, P.J.; Pulido-Suárez, L.; Fernández-López, M.; León-Barrios, M. The Rhizosphere Microbiome Associated with the Legume Spartocytisus supranubius in the High Mountain Ecosystem of Teide N.P. First Spanish-Portuguese Congress on Beneficial Plant-Microbe Interactions, Poster S1-P-03. Available online: https://events.iniav.pt/bemiplant/images/book-abstracts_15-10-2022.pdf (accessed on 9 February 2023).
  116. Ren, H.; Islam, M.S.; Wang, H.; Guo, H.; Wang, Z.; Qi, X.; Zhang, S.; Guo, J.; Wang, Q.; Li, B. Effect of humic acid on soil physical and chemical properties, microbial community structure, and metabolites of decline diseased bayberry. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Taniguchi, T.; Isobe, K.; Imada, S.; Eltayeb, M.; Akaji, Y.; Nakayama, M.; Allen, M.F.; Aronson, E. Root endophytic bacterial and fungal communities in a natural hot desert are differentially regulated in dry and wet seasons by stochastic processes and functional traits. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4363629 (accessed on 25 February 2023).
  118. Zhou, Y.; Pang, Z.; Jia, H.; Yuan, Z.; Ming, R. Responses of roots and rhizosphere of female papaya to the exogenous application of GA3. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Obieze, C.C.; George, P.B.L.; Boyle, B.; Khasa, D.P. Black pepper rhizomicrobiome: Spectrum of plant health indicators, critical environmental factors and community compartmentation in Vietnam. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2023, 187, 104857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Deng, J.; Yin, Y.; Zhu, W.; Zhou, Y. Response of soil environment factors and microbial communities to phytoremediation with Robinia pseudoacacia in an open-cut magnesite mine. Land Degrad. Dev. 2020, 31, 2340–2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ezeokoli, O.T.; Bezuidenhout, C.C.; Maboeta, M.S.; Khasa, D.P.; Adeleke, R.A. Structural and functional differentiation of bacterial communities in post-coal mining reclamation soils of South Africa: Bioindicators of soil ecosystem restoration. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Thompson, E.; Erickson, M.; Malik, N.; Mettler, R.; Reman, B.; Ren, Y.; Bergmann, D. Culture-independent characterization of “cave silver” biofilms from the 1470 m level of the Sanford Underground Research Facility, Lead, SD. Proc. South Dak. Acad. Sci. 2020, 99, 29–55. [Google Scholar]
  123. Arif, S.; Nacke, H.; Schliekmann, E.; Reimer, A.; Arp, G.; Hoppert, M. Composition and niche-specific characteristics of microbial consortia colonizing Marsberg copper mine in the Rhenish Massif. Biogeosciences 2021, 19, 4883–4902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Shi, A.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, D.; Xu, J.; Rensing, C.; Zhang, L.; Xing, S.; Ni, W.; Yang, W. Biochar loaded with bacteria enhanced Cd/Zn phytoextraction by facilitating plant growth and shaping rhizospheric microbial community. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 327, 121559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Diaz-Herraiz, M.; Jurado, V.; Cuezva, S.; Laiz, L.; Pallecchi, P.; Tiano, P.; Sanchez-Moral, S.; Saiz-Jimenez, C. Deterioration of an Etruscan tomb by bacteria from the order Rhizobiales. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 3610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Zacharenka, F. Study of the Bacterial Diversity on Ancient Mural Paintings from Kalliroi’s Fountain and Pana’s Sanctuary. Master’s Thesis, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  127. Duan, Y.; Wu, F.; Wang, W.; He, D.; Gu, J.-D.; Feng, H.; Chen, T.; Liu, G.; An, L. The microbial community characteristics of ancient painted sculptures in Maijishan Grottoes, China. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179718. [Google Scholar]
  128. Li, Q.; Zhang, B.; Wang, L.; Ge, Q. Distribution and diversity of bacteria and fungi colonizing ancient Buddhist statues analyzed by high-throughput sequencing. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2017, 117, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Li, Q.; Zhang, B.; Yang, X.; Ge, Q. Deterioration-associated microbiome of stone monuments: Structure, variation, and assembly. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e02680-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Zhang, X.; Ge, Q.; Zhu, Z.; Deng, Y.; Gu, J.-D. Microbiological community of the Royal Palace in Angkor Thom and Beng Mealea of Cambodia by Illumina sequencing based on 16S rRNA gene. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2018, 134, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Dyda, M.; Pyzik, A.; Wilkojc, E.; Kwiatkowska-Kopka, B.; Sklodowska, A. Bacterial and fungal diversity inside the medieval building constructed with sandstone plates and lime mortar as an example of the microbial colonization of a nutrient-limited extreme environment (Wawel Royal Castle, Krakow, Poland). Microorganisms 2019, 7, 416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Jroundi, F.; Elert, K.; Ruiz-Agudo, E.; Gonzalez-Muñoz, M.T.; Rodriguez-Navarro, C. Bacterial diversity evolution in Maya plaster and stone following a bio-conservation treatment. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 599144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Louati, M.; Ennis, N.J.; Ghodhbane-Gtari, F.; Hezbri, K.; Sevigny, J.L.; Fahnestock, M.F.; Cherif-Silini, H.; Bryce, J.G.; Tisa, L.S.; Gtari, M. Elucidating the ecological networks in stone-dwelling microbiomes. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 22, 1467–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Schröer, L.; De Kock, T.; Cnudde, V.; Boon, N. Differential colonization of microbial communities inhabiting Lede stone in the urban and rural environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 733, 139339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Yang, S.; Wu, L.; Wu, B.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Tan, X. Diversity and structure of soil microbiota of the Jinsha earthen relic. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0236165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Coelho, C.; Mesquita, N.; Costa, I.; Soares, F.; Trovão, J.; Freitas, H.; Portugal, A.; Tiago, I. Bacterial and archaeal structural diversity in several biodeterioration patterns on the limestone walls of the Old Cathedral of Coimbra. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Ipekci, E. Evaluation of Stone Deterioration Problems of Anavarza Archaeological Site for the Purpose of Conservation. Ph.D. Thesis, İzmir Institute of Technology, Urla, Turkey, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  138. Sansupa, C.; Suphaphimol, N.; Nonthijun, P.; Ronsuek, T.; Yimklan, S.; Semakul, N.; Khrueraya, T.; Suwannarach, N.; Purahong, W.; Disayathanoowat, T. The microbiome of a 13th century Lan Na mural painting: Diversity, taxonomic distribution and their biodeterioration potentials. Microorganisms 2023, 11. in press. [Google Scholar]
  139. Chen, P.; Zhang, L.; Guo, X.; Dai, X.; Liu, L.; Xi, L.; Wang, J.; Song, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; et al. Diversity, biogeography, and biodegradation potential of actinobacteria in the deep-sea sediments along the Southwest Indian Ridge. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Pietrzak, K.; Otlewska, A.; Dybka, K.; Danielewicz, D.; Pangallo, D.; Demnerová, K.; Ďurovič, M.; Kraková, L.; Scholtz, V.; Bučková, M.; et al. A modern approach to biodeterioration assessment and disinfection of historical book. In A Modern Approach to Biodeterioration Assessment and the Disinfection of Historical Book Collections; Gutarowska, B., Ed.; Institute of Fermentation Technology and Microbiology, Łódź University of Technology: Łódź, Poland, 2016; pp. 81–125. [Google Scholar]
  141. Gozari, M.; Bahador, N.; Jassbi, A.R.; Mortazavi, M.S.; Hamzehei, S.; Eftekhar, E. Isolation, distribution and evaluation of cytotoxic and antioxidant activity of cultivable actinobacteria from the Oman Sea sediments. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 2019, 38, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Van Assche, A. Characterization of the Bacterial Community Composition in Drinking Water Production and Distribution Systems, Emphasizing Acinetobacter species. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  143. Argudo Fernández, M. Microbial Communities Responses in Fluvial Biofilms under Metal Stressed Scenarios. Ph.D. Thesis, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  144. Cao, W.; Xiong, Y.; Zhao, D.; Tan, H.; Qu, J. Bryophytes and the symbiotic microorganisms, the pioneers of vegetation restoration in karst rocky desertification areas in southwestern China. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 873–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Caffrey, P.; Hogan, M.; Song, Y. New glycosylated polyene macrolides: Refining the ore from genome mining. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Yang, Y.; Qiu, J.; Wang, X. Exploring the dynamic of bacterial communities in Manila clam (Ruditapes philippinarum) during refrigerated storage. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 882629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Boquet, E.; Boronat, A.; Ramos-Cormenzana, A. Production of calcite (calcium carbonate) crystals by soil bacteria is a general phenomenon. Nature 1973, 246, 527–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Barton, H.A.; Northup, D.E. Geomicrobiology in cave environments: Past, current and future perspectives. J. Cave Karst Stud. 2007, 69, 163–178. [Google Scholar]
  149. Banks, E.D.; Taylor, N.M.; Gulley, J.; Lubbers, B.R.; Giarrizzo, J.G.; Bullen, H.A.; Hoehler, T.M.; Barton, H.A. Bacterial calcium carbonate precipitation in cave environments: A function of calcium homeostasis. Geomicrobiol. J. 2010, 27, 444–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Cañaveras, J.C.; Hoyos, M.; Sanchez-Moral, S.; Sanz-Rubio, E.; Bedoya, J.; Soler, V.; Groth, I.; Schumann, P.; Laiz, L.; Gonzalez, I.; et al. Microbial communities associated to hydromagnesite and needle fiber aragonite deposits in a karstic cave (Altamira, Northern Spain). Geomicrobiol. J. 1999, 16, 9–25. [Google Scholar]
  151. Sanchez-Moral, S.; Cañaveras, J.C.; Laiz, L.; Saiz-Jimenez, C.; Bedoya, J.; Luque, L. Biomediated precipitation of calcium carbonate metastable phases in hypogean environments: A short review. Geomicrobiol. J. 2003, 20, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Cuezva, S.; Fernandez-Cortes, A.; Porca, E.; Pasic, L.; Jurado, V.; Hernandez-Marine, M.; Serrano-Ortiz, P.; Cañaveras, J.C.; Sanchez-Moral, S.; Saiz-Jimenez, C. The biogeochemical role of Actinobacteria in Altamira Cave, Spain. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2012, 81, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Maciejewska, M.; Adam, D.; Naômé, A.; Martinet, L.; Tenconi, E.; Calusinska, M.; Delfosse, P.; Hanikenne, M.; Baurain, D.; Compère, P.; et al. Assessment of the potential role of Streptomyces in cave moonmilk formation. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Hoffmann, T.D.; Reeksting, B.J.; Gebhard, S. Bacteria-induced mineral precipitation: A mechanistic review. Microbiology 2021, 167, 001049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Tomé, D. Yeast extracts: Nutritional and flavoring food ingredients. ACS Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 1, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Joubert, J.J.; van Rensburg, E.J.; Pitout, M.J. A plate method for demonstrating the breakdown of heparin and chrondoitin sulphate by bacteria. J. Microbiol. Methods 1984, 2, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Sanchez-Moral, S.; Luque, L.; Cañaveras, J.C.; Laiz, L.; Jurado, V.; Saiz-Jimenez, C. Bioinduced barium precipitation in St. Callixtus and Domitilla catacombs. Ann. Microbiol. 2004, 54, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  158. Sanchez-Moral, S.; Bedoya, J.; Luque, L.; Cañaveras, J.C.; Jurado, V.; Laiz, L.; Saiz-Jimenez, C. Biomineralization of different crystalline phases by bacteria isolated from catacombs. In Molecular Biology and Cultural Heritage; Saiz-Jimenez, C., Ed.; Balkema: Lisse, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 179–185. [Google Scholar]
  159. Rivadeneyra, M.A.; Ramos-Cormenzana, A.; García-Cervigón, A. Bacterial formation of struvite. Geomicrobiol. J. 1983, 3, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Rivadeneyra, M.A.; Pérez-García, I.; Ramos-Cormenzana, A. Influence of ammonium ion on bacterial struvite production. Geomicrobiol. J. 1992, 10, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Manzoor, M.A.P.; Singh, B.; Agrawal, A.K.; Arun, A.B.; Mujeeburahiman, M.; Rekha, P.-D. Morphological and micro-tomographic study on evolution of struvite in synthetic urine infected with bacteria and investigation of its pathological biomineralization. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0202306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Sánchez-Román, M.; Rivadeneyra, M.A.; Vasconcelos, C.; McKenzie, J.A. Biomineralization of carbonate and phosphate by moderately halophilic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2007, 61, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Cañaveras, J.C.; Cuezva, S.; Sanchez-Moral, S.; Lario, J.; Laiz, L.; Gonzalez, J.M.; Saiz-Jimenez, C. On the origin of fiber calcite crystals in moonmilk deposits. Naturwissenschaften 2006, 93, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Onac, B.P.; Ghergari, L. Moonmilk mineralogy in some Romanian and Norwegian Caves. Cave Sci. 1993, 20, 106–120. [Google Scholar]
  165. Cañaveras, J.C.; Sanchez–Moral, S.; Soler, V.; Saiz-Jimenez, C. Microorganisms and microbially induced fabrics in cave walls. Geomicrobiol. J. 2001, 18, 223–240. [Google Scholar]
  166. Baskar, S.; Baskar, R.; Routh, J. Biogenic evidences of moonmilk deposition in the Mawmluh Cave, Meghalaya, India. Geomicrobiol. J. 2011, 28, 252–265. [Google Scholar]
  167. Jones, B.; Peng, X. Abiogenic growth of needle-fiber calcite in spring towers at Shiqiang, Yunnan province, China. J. Sediment. Res. 2014, 84, 1021–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Cuezva, S.; Sanchez-Moral, S.; Saiz-Jimenez, C.; Cañaveras, J.C. Microbial communities and associated mineral fabrics in Altamira Cave, Spain. Int. J. Speleol. 2009, 38, 83–92. [Google Scholar]
  169. Sanchez-Moral, S.; Portillo, M.C.; Janices, I.; Cuezva, S.; Fernández-Cortés, A.; Cañaveras, J.C.; Gonzalez, J.M. The role of microorganisms in the formation of calcitic moonmilk deposits and speleothems in Altamira Cave. Geomorphology 2012, 139–140, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Maciejewska, M.; Calusinska, M.; Cornet, L.; Adam, D.; Pessi, I.S.; Malchair, S.; Delfosse, P.; Baurain, D.; Barton, H.; Carnol, M.; et al. High-throughput sequencing analysis of the actinobacterial spatial diversity in moonmilk deposits. Antibiotics 2018, 7, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Groth, I.; Schumann, P.; Laiz, L.; Sanchez–Moral, S.; Cañaveras, J.C.; Saiz-Jimenez, C. Geomicrobiological study of the Grotta dei Cervi, Porto Badisco, Italy. Geomicrobiol. J. 2001, 18, 241–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Park, S.; Cho, Y.-J.; Jung, D.; Jo, K.; Lee, E.-J.; Lee, J.-S. Microbial diversity in moonmilk of Baeg-nyong Cave, Korean CZO. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Cirigliano, A.; Tomassetti, M.C.; Di Pietro, M.; Mura, F.; Maneschi, M.L.; Gentili, M.D.; Cardazzo, B.; Arrighi, C.; Mazzoni, C.; Negri, R.; et al. Calcite moonmilk of microbial origin in the Etruscan Tomba degli Scudi in Tarquinia, Italy. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 15839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Maciejewska, M.; Pessi, I.S.; Arguelles-Arias, A.; Noirfalise, P.; Luis, G.; Ongena, M.; Barton, H.; Carnol, M.; Rigali, S. Streptomyces lunaelactis sp. nov., a novel ferroverdin A-producing Streptomyces species isolated from a moonmilk speleothem. Anton. Leeuw. 2015, 107, 519–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Svec, P.; Kosina, M.; Zeman, M.; Holochová, P.; Králová, S.; Nemcová, E.; Micenková, L.; Urvashi, M.; Gupta, V.; Sood, U.; et al. Pseudomonas karstica sp. nov. and Pseudomonas spelaei sp. nov., isolated from calcite moonmilk deposits from caves. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 5131–5140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Adam, D.; Maciejewska, M.; Naômé, A.; Martinet, L.; Coppieters, W.; Karim, L.; Baurain, D.; Rigali, S. Isolation, Characterization, and antibacterial activity of hard-to-culture Actinobacteria from cave moonmilk deposits. Antibiotics 2018, 7, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Jaroszewicz, W.; Bielanska, P.; Lubomska, D.; Kosznik-Kwasnicka, K.; Golec, P.; Grabowski, Ł.; Wieczerzak, E.; Drózdz, W.; Gaffke, L.; Pierzynowska, K.; et al. Antibacterial, antifungal and anticancer activities of compounds produced by newly isolated Streptomyces strains from the Szczelina Chochołowska Cave (Tatra Mountains, Poland). Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Jaroszewicz, W.; Bielanska, P.; Lubomska, D.; Kosznik-Kwasnicka, K.; Golec, P.; Grabowski, Ł.; Wieczerzak, E.; Drózdz, W.; Gaffke, L.; Pierzynowska, K.; et al. Antimicrobial activities of compounds produced by newly isolated Streptomyces strains from Mountain Caves. Med. Sci. Forum 2022, 12, 7. [Google Scholar]
  179. Maciejewska, M.; Adam, D.; Martinet, L.; Naômé, A.; Całusińska, M.; Delfosse, P.; Carnol, M.; Barton, H.A.; Hayette, M.-P.; Smargiasso, N.; et al. A Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of the antimicrobial potential of cultivable Streptomyces isolated from cave moonmilk deposits. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Martinet, L.; Naômé, A.; Rezende, L.C.D.; Tellatin, D.; Pignon, B.; Docquier, J.-D.; Sannio, F.; Baiwir, D.; Mazzucchelli, G.; Frédérich, M.; et al. Lunaemycins, new cyclic hexapeptide antibiotics from the cave moonmilk-dweller Streptomyces lunaelactis MM109T. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Martinet, L.; Naômé, A.; Baiwir, D.; De Pauw, E.; Mazzucchelli, G.; Rigali, S. On the risks of phylogeny-based strain prioritization for drug discovery: Streptomyces lunaelactis as a case study. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Applbiosci 02 00014 g001 550
Figure 1. Scanning electron micrographs of moonmilk deposits in Pindal Cave, Spain. (a) Longitudinal view of sediment covered by moonmilk. (b,c) Crystalline calcite fibres (red arrow) and Actinomycetota filaments (blue arrow). (d) Scanning electron micrographs and EDX spectra of crystalline calcite fibres. Note the swelling of filaments in (c), similar to those reported for Crossiella cryophila [3].
Figure 1. Scanning electron micrographs of moonmilk deposits in Pindal Cave, Spain. (a) Longitudinal view of sediment covered by moonmilk. (b,c) Crystalline calcite fibres (red arrow) and Actinomycetota filaments (blue arrow). (d) Scanning electron micrographs and EDX spectra of crystalline calcite fibres. Note the swelling of filaments in (c), similar to those reported for Crossiella cryophila [3].
Applbiosci 02 00014 g001
Applbiosci 02 00014 g002 550
Figure 2. Scanning electron micrographs and EDX spectra of barium carbonate and phosphate crystals from two strains of Crossiella sp. (Cross-1 and Cross-2) [7]. (a) Witherite (barium carbonate) crystals and Crossiella filaments in culture medium Ba1 (Cross-1). (b) Witherite crystals in culture medium Ba1 (Cross-2). (c) Struvite (magnesium ammonium phosphate) crystals in culture medium Ba1 (Cross-1). (d) Crossiella filaments without crystal formation in tryptic soy agar medium (Cross-2).
Figure 2. Scanning electron micrographs and EDX spectra of barium carbonate and phosphate crystals from two strains of Crossiella sp. (Cross-1 and Cross-2) [7]. (a) Witherite (barium carbonate) crystals and Crossiella filaments in culture medium Ba1 (Cross-1). (b) Witherite crystals in culture medium Ba1 (Cross-2). (c) Struvite (magnesium ammonium phosphate) crystals in culture medium Ba1 (Cross-1). (d) Crossiella filaments without crystal formation in tryptic soy agar medium (Cross-2).
Applbiosci 02 00014 g002
Table
Table 1. Occurrence and relative abundance (>1%) of Crossiella in Spanish karstic environments, as reported in NGS studies.
Table 1. Occurrence and relative abundance (>1%) of Crossiella in Spanish karstic environments, as reported in NGS studies.
CaveRelative AbundanceGenusType of Sample References
Pindal 16.0–27.1CrossiellaMoonmilk[26,28,31]
1.4–1.7CrossiellaSediment under moonmilk
11.3–11.7CrossiellaTop-layer sediments
6.0–9.0CrossiellaSediments
5.3–7.9CrossiellaYellow biofilm
2.0–8.0
7.0–8.0		Crossiella
Crossiella		Grey biofilms
Pink biofilms
Fuente de la Canaria12.6–12.8CrossiellaMucous formations [29]
12.3CrossiellaMoonmilk
6.7CrossiellaBrown and yellow deposits
Bucara II38.9
24.9		Crossiella
Crossiella		Pink deposit
Moonmilk		[29]
Nerja0.1–1.5CrossiellaPhototrophic biofilms[30]
Castañar15.0CrossiellaGrey biofilm[31]
Altamira>20.0
27.0
38.0		Crossiella
Crossiella
Crossiella		Grey biofilms
White biofilms
Yellow biofilms 		[8]
Covadura26.4–54.1
21.8–51.9
4.5–19.7		Crossiella
Crossiella
Crossiella		White biofilm
Yellow biofilm
Sediments		Unpublished data
Yeso1.3–13.3CrossiellaSedimentsUnpublished data
Thyssen Museum
basement		16.6
64.2
2.8–7.4		Crossiella
Crossiella
Crossiella		White biofilm
Grey biofilm
Sediment		[32]
Table
Table 2. Occurrence and relative abundance (>1%) of Crossiella in caves all over the world.
Table 2. Occurrence and relative abundance (>1%) of Crossiella in caves all over the world.
Karstic CavesRelative Abundance%GenusType of Sample (Method)References
Heshangn.d.CrossiellaWeathered rocks (NGS)[35]
Laugerie-Haute 4.0CrossiellaSalt efflorescences (clones)[36]
Sorcerers30.0CrossiellaSalt efflorescences (NGS)[37]
Pilliern.d.CrossiellaWall rock (NGS)[38]
Yixing Shanjuan3.9CrossiellaSpeleothem (NGS)[39]
Shuanghe9.5CrossiellaRock (NGS)[40]
Manao-Pee4.1CrossiellaSoil (NGS)[41]
KN1427.1–52.3CrossiellaRock/Clay (NGS)[42]
RN51.0–17.9CrossiellaRock/Clay/Mud (NGS)[42]
Maijishan Grottoesn.d.CrossiellaWalls paintings (NGS)[43]
Heshangn.d.CrossiellaWeathered rocks (NGS)[44]
Kashmir and Tiser11.9–36.6CrossiellaSoil (NGS)[45]
Zhijin4.1CrossiellaWall rock (NGS)[46]
Rouffignac~70.0CrossiellaWall rock (NGS)[47]
Stiffe9.9CrossiellaBiofilms (NGS)[48]
Heshangn.d.CrossiellaWeathered rocks (NGS)[49]
Cave Church0.1–4.9CrossiellaFresco (NGS)[50]
Volcanic Caves
Azorean caves18.6CrossiellaBiofilms (clones)[51]
Hawaiian cavesn.d.CrossiellaBiofilms (NGS)[52]
Californian cavesn.d.CrossiellaBiofilms (NGS)[53]
Idahoan cavesn.d.CrossiellaBiofilms (NGS)[54]
Sicilian caves62.5–77.6CrossiellaBiofilms (NGS)[55]
Other Cave Types
Carlsbad Cavernn.d.CrossiellaRocks (clones)[56]
Imawarì Yeutan.d.CrossiellaPatina/Speleothems (NGS)[57]
n.d. Not determined.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martin-Pozas, T.; Gonzalez-Pimentel, J.L.; Jurado, V.; Laiz, L.; Cañaveras, J.C.; Fernandez-Cortes, A.; Cuezva, S.; Sanchez-Moral, S.; Saiz-Jimenez, C. Crossiella, a Rare Actinomycetota Genus, Abundant in the Environment. Appl. Biosci. 2023, 2, 194-210. https://doi.org/10.3390/applbiosci2020014

AMA Style

Martin-Pozas T, Gonzalez-Pimentel JL, Jurado V, Laiz L, Cañaveras JC, Fernandez-Cortes A, Cuezva S, Sanchez-Moral S, Saiz-Jimenez C. Crossiella, a Rare Actinomycetota Genus, Abundant in the Environment. Applied Biosciences. 2023; 2(2):194-210. https://doi.org/10.3390/applbiosci2020014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martin-Pozas, Tamara, Jose Luis Gonzalez-Pimentel, Valme Jurado, Leonila Laiz, Juan Carlos Cañaveras, Angel Fernandez-Cortes, Soledad Cuezva, Sergio Sanchez-Moral, and Cesareo Saiz-Jimenez. 2023. "Crossiella, a Rare Actinomycetota Genus, Abundant in the Environment" Applied Biosciences 2, no. 2: 194-210. https://doi.org/10.3390/applbiosci2020014

APA Style

Martin-Pozas, T., Gonzalez-Pimentel, J. L., Jurado, V., Laiz, L., Cañaveras, J. C., Fernandez-Cortes, A., Cuezva, S., Sanchez-Moral, S., & Saiz-Jimenez, C. (2023). Crossiella, a Rare Actinomycetota Genus, Abundant in the Environment. Applied Biosciences, 2(2), 194-210. https://doi.org/10.3390/applbiosci2020014

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop