Next Article in Journal
Impact of the Smoking Process on Biogenic Amine Levels in Traditional Dry-Cured Chorizo
Previous Article in Journal
Pros and Cons of Separation, Fractionation and Cleanup for Enhancement of the Quantitative Analysis of Bitumen-Derived Organics in Process-Affected Waters—A Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Separations
Volume 10
Issue 12
10.3390/separations10120584
separations-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Using Kerosene as an Auxiliary Collector to Recover Gold from Refractory Gold Ore Based on Mineralogical Characteristics

by
Xuesong Sun
1,2,
Jianwen Yu
1,2,*,
Jianping Jin
1,2,
Hao Sun
1,2,
Yanjun Li
1,2 and
Yuexin Han
1,2
1
School of Resources and Civil Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
2
National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center of High-Efficient Exploitation Technology for Refractory Iron Ore Resources, Shenyang 110819, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Separations 2023, 10(12), 584; https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10120584
Submission received: 30 October 2023 / Revised: 21 November 2023 / Accepted: 22 November 2023 / Published: 25 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Purification Technology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Carbon–arsenic-bearing gold ore is a typical complex refractory gold resource. Traditionally, xanthate was often used as a flotation agent to separate gold minerals. But, in this paper, in order to reduce the cost of the agent, kerosene was used as an auxiliary collector, and the gold grade and recovery rate were increased by about 10 g/t and 5.5%, respectively. Through process mineralogy studies of the raw ore, it was found that the ore has an Au grade of 5.68 g/t, most of which is surrounded by sulfide ore, accounting for 79.46%. The main minerals are pyrite, arsenopyrite, and quartz, etc. Their content, shape, particle size distribution, and occurrence state were obtained via microscopic observation and statistical analysis. According to the results of process mineralogy, various flotation conditions were tested, including grinding fineness, kerosene dosage, collector dosage, foaming agent dosage, and the slurry pH value. The optimal chemical system and the process flow of “two roughing, three cleaning and two scavenging” were finally determined, and the concentrate product with a gold grade of 42.83 g/t and recovery of 91.02% was obtained, which verified the feasibility of the kerosene-assisted xanthate flotation of refractory gold.

1. Introduction

Gold is an important precious metal, a trace element, with excellent (stable) chemical and physical properties; it has a wide range of applications in electronic products, jewelry, equipment manufacturing, finance, and other fields, affecting the world’s economic development, industrial production, and financial order [1,2,3,4,5]. According to these data, as of 2022, China’s official gold reserves totaled 2964.37 tons, and with the continuous development of science, more and more gold still needs to be mined to meet the needs of production and life [6,7].
At present, due to the continuous exploitation and utilization of gold mines, high-quality gold ore resources have been gradually depleted, and low-grade complex refractory gold ore has gradually begun to become the focus of attention. At present, there is no unified standard for the classification of refractory gold ores, but according to the mineralogical analysis of minerals, refractory minerals can be mainly divided into the following three categories: (1) complex polymetallic gold sulfide ore, (2) gold carbide ore, and (3) gold telluride. The main reason for refractory gold mines is that gold is wrapped in sulfide ores or the leached gold is adsorbed by organic carbon and other substances in these minerals, resulting in a “gold robbing” phenomenon, which affects the recycling of gold [8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. So arsenic-carbon-containing gold sulfide ore is one of the most difficult gold ores to treat at present, and it is also an important gold ore resource in China.
Sitando et al. [15] found that the “gold-robbing” abilities of different types of “gold-robbing” substances are significantly different. Quartz only adsorbed 1.7% of the gold, kaolinite, and hematite adsorbed about 18% of the gold, while pyrite sulfides and carbonaceous materials, which are highly “gold-robbing”, absorbed all gold within half an hour. Therefore, for complex and refractory gold mines, the ore is generally pretreated to eliminate the influence of unfavorable factors on leaching in the gold ore by changing the physical and chemical properties of the ore so as to obtain the best leaching rate. However, the pretreatment process requires high-pollution and high-energy consumption processes, such as roasting, and the leaching process also requires a large number of highly toxic substances, such as cyanide, which greatly damages the environment [16,17,18,19]. Therefore, it is an effective separation method to enrich the target minerals using flotation reagents through beneficiation technology, increasing the gold grade in the concentrate and greatly reducing the use of cyanide and energy consumption [20,21].
Since most of the gold is embedded in sulfide ores, gold extraction can be achieved using flotation sulfides. The commonly used flotation agent is generally xanthate, but in actual production, xanthate also has the shortcomings of a high price and strong pollution. Moreover, the carbon in the gold ore has adsorbability to the collector [22]. Therefore, in order to reduce the amount of xanthate, in the flotation industry experiment, a more economical agent is often selected, and useful minerals are recovered collaboratively through a combination of drugs to achieve the purpose of reducing costs [23,24,25,26]. Kerosene has received a lot of attention in recent years as a common flotation collector and auxiliary collector, and some studies have shown that kerosene can have a synergistic effect with the sulfide ore collector to improve the recovery rate of gold [22,27,28,29].
Therefore, in order to solve the problems of environmental pollution and the high cost of the collector in the process of the flotation of refractory gold ores, a flotation separation test was carried out on a carbon-containing arsenic-containing sulfide refractory gold mine in Fengcheng, China, using kerosene combined with xanthate; the appropriate separation process flow and agent system were created. And a detailed process mineralogy study was carried out on the mineral in order to maximize the understanding of the ore properties and provide a theoretical basis for the determination of the beneficiation process.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples

The samples used in this test were from Huifeng Mining Co., Ltd., Fengcheng, China. crushed to −2 mm with a double roll crusher and thoroughly mixed as test raw materials. Table 1 shows the chemical composition of the raw ore. It can be seen from Table 1 that the content of Au in the raw ore is 5.68 g/t, and the main oxides are SiO2 and A2O3, the contents of which are 58.28% and 14.51%, respectively. The proportion of S is 3.90%, and the harmful elements of C and As are 1.02% and 0.364%, respectively. The X-ray diffractometry (XRD) analysis in Figure 1 shows that the main minerals of the ore are muscovite, quartz, and pyrite, and the content of gold minerals is very low.

2.2. Mineral Technology Methods

The primary phase determination of gold minerals was carried out using XRD and the chemical multielement method. The ore was mixed with resin to achieve polished slices, and the composition of the raw ore was observed via an optical microscope (DM6000 M, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). The structural characteristics and occurrence state of metal minerals and gangue minerals were determined using the Mineral Liberation Analyser(MLA250, FEI, Brno, Czech Republic) and Scanning Electron Microscope (Quanta 250, FEI, Brno, Czech Republic) analysis of the raw ore grinding products.

2.3. Floatation Methods

After grinding the ore sample to the required fineness, the flotation test was carried out in the XFGII aerated hanging cell flotation machine; after adjusting the required pH, according to the amount required for each test, the auxiliary collector kerosene, the activator copper sulfate, the collector xanthate and the foaming agent terpenic oil (2# oil) were added in turn, and the flotation time and the amount of agent added are displayed in the flow chart of each conditional experiment. The foam product and the product in the tank were filtered separately, dried, and weighed, and samples were taken to analyze the gold grade and calculate the recovery rate. After the ore was analyzed via process mineralogy, grinding and flotation were carried out. The research roadmap is shown in Figure 2a. The flotation process of “two roughing, two cleaning and two scavenging” was initially adopted in the test (Figure 2b). The optimal dosage of the collector, foaming agent, and others was determined according to the recovery rate and grade of the concentrate. And under the best dosage, according to the grade and recovery rate of the obtained concentrate, it was determined whether to increase or reduce the amount of roughing, cleaning, scavenging, and obtain the final process. Generally, when the grade was not satisfied, the number of cleanings could be increased.

3. Results

3.1. Ore Components and Mineral Characteristics

The main mineral content of the gold ore is shown in Figure 3. The sulfide ore is dominated by pyrite, followed by arsenopyrite. The percentage of the mineral mass contents is 8.94% and 1.05%, respectively. It also contains trace amounts of chalcopyrite and sphalerite. The main gangue minerals in the ore are quartz and muscovite, with mass fractions of 35.68% and 36.13%, respectively. In addition, it contains a small amount of biotite, carbonate minerals, feldspar, chlorite, and so on.

3.1.1. Gold

The Au content of the gold mine is 5.68 g/t, and all the gold-bearing minerals found in the ore are natural gold. The gold particles observed under the optical microscope are shown in Figure 4a–c, mainly in the form of wheat grains, followed by needle- and leaf-shaped particles. The gold particles observed via a scanning electron microscope are shown in Figure 4d. The short diameter of the natural gold is 1.600 μm, the long diameter is 3.751 μm, and the elongation is 2.34. Monomer gold is angular granular and not connected to other minerals. The distribution size of natural gold is very small and is distributed between 0.001 mm and 0.01 mm. Among them, 0.01~0.005 mm accounted for 71.42%, and 0.005~0.001 mm accounted for 28.58%.
The results of the phase analysis of Au are shown in Table 2. The gold particles in the ore are mostly covered by metal minerals and gangue minerals. Wrapped gold accounted for 96.43%, and naked and semi-naked gold accounted for 3.57%. The gold coated using sulfide was the main gold, accounting for 79.46%, so the beneficiation method mainly recovered gold by recovering the sulfide ore. It was followed by carbonate-coated gold, brown iron-coated gold, and silicate-coated gold, accounting for 3.13%, 3.87%, and 9.97%, respectively.

3.1.2. Pyrite

Pyrite is the main metallic mineral in ores, with a relatively high content. Under the microscope, pyrite mostly shows an idiomorphic and semi-idiomorphic granular structure, and a small amount shows a sheet and rod-like structure, Figure 5a–d. The main disseminated structure is distributed in the gangue, Figure 5e, and a small amount of pyrite aggregates are distributed in the gangue in a striped manner, Figure 5f. A graphite-filling distribution, Figure 5g,h, is common at the edges with intergranular and pores of pyrite, and graphite has a negative effect on the flotation process. Combined with MLA (Figure 6) and SEM (Figure 5i,j), it can be seen that some pyrite is closely associated with other metal minerals, and the monomer pyrite is coated with a small amount of quartz and arsenopyrite, while the coated pyrite is mainly coated with quartz, muscovite, and other minerals.
As can be seen from Figure 7, the distribution size of pyrite in flotation minerals is very fine, with a −75 μm particle content accounting for 98.33% and a −38 μm content for 79.11%. The average content of Fe in pyrite is 46.80%, which belongs to high sulfur iron-poor pyrite. It generally contains a small amount of As, with an average content of 1.76%.

3.1.3. Arsenopyrite

Arsenopyrite is the main source of arsenic in raw ore. As shown in Figure 8, the results of the microscope show that arsenopyrite is mainly distributed in gangue in the form of the granular, rhomboid, spear, and needle. Arsenopyrite and pyrite are adjacent and crystalline symbiosis, and the boundary between arsenopyrite and pyrite is not obvious, while some arsenopyrite is colloidal around pyrite. As can be seen from the SEM of arsenopyrite (Figure 8e,f), the arsenopyrite is coated with a small amount of quartz, and the wrapped arsenopyrite is mainly coated with quartz, muscovite, pyrite, and other minerals.

3.1.4. Carbon

Carbon is mainly produced in flake aggregates; flake crystals are often curved and dispersed in gangue (G), and the particle size is not uniform (Figure 9a). Some of the carbon is in contact with pyrite particles and is filled in the intergranular and pore spaces of pyrite (Figure 9b). The results in Table 3 show that the carbon in the raw ore is mainly organic carbon, accounting for 45.10%, while the carbon and graphitic carbon in carbonate account for 26.47% and 28.43%, respectively.

3.1.5. Quartz

Quartz is mainly produced in idiomorphic and semi-idiomorphic granular aggregates with fine and uniform particle sizes. Quartz is associated with feldspar, muscovite, biotite, amphibole, and other minerals, and the grains are filled with sericite carbonate minerals, and some fine quartz is embedded in the sericite aggregate (Figure 10).

3.2. Floatation Tests

3.2.1. Grinding Fineness Condition Test

Firstly, the beneficiation process of “two roughing, two cleaning and two scavenging” was designed in order to preliminarily explore the beneficiation index. The natural pH of the slurry and the dosage of kerosene were set to 1600 g/t, the dosage of copper sulfate was 400 g/t (First roughing 200 g/t, Second rouging 200 g/t), and the dosage of isoamyl xanthate was 300 g/t (Fr, Sr 100 g/t, First scavenging, Second scavenging 50 g/t), the total dosage of foaming agent 2# oil was 160 g/t (Fr, Sr 50 g/t, Fs, Ss 30 g/t). The influence of grinding fineness of −0.074 mm on the flotation index of 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 85% and 90% was investigated, the test process is shown in Figure 10, and the test results are shown in Figure 11.
The results in Figure 12 show that with the increase in the grinding fineness, the Au grade in the concentrate showed an increasing trend, while the Au recovery rate showed a decreasing trend. When the grain size of the grinding product was fine, the gold mineral in the ore was better when dissociated from gangue minerals, and the Au grade of the concentrate increased. However, due to the fine grinding, the difference between the concentrate and tailings was not obvious, and the gold-bearing minerals in the ore were lost in the tailings, which could not be effectively recovered, resulting in a low recovery rate [30,31]. When the fineness of the grinding product increased from 80% to 90% and from −0.074 mm, the Au grade in the concentrate increased from 40.34 g/t to 41.17 g/t, and the Au recovery rate decreased from 63.98% to 59.53%. The Au grade in the concentrate could not be greatly improved, and the recovery rate decreased by 4.45%. The influence of grinding fineness on the concentrate index was comprehensively analyzed, and the appropriate grinding fineness was determined to be −0.074 mm, which accounted for 85%.

3.2.2. Kerosene Dosage Condition Test

As the flotation effect was good, the previous flotation process continued to carry out conditional tests. Under the condition that the fineness of grinding was 85% −0.074 mm, with the natural pH of the pulp, the total amount of copper sulfate was 400 g/t (Fr 200 g/t, Sr 200 g/t), the total amount of isoamyl xanthate was 300 g/t (Fr, Sr 100 g/t, Fs, Ss 50 g/t), and the total amount of 2# oil was 160 g/t (Fr, Sr 50 g/t, Fs, Ss 30 g/t). Kerosene consumption was selected as 800 g/t, 1200 g/t, 1600 g/t, 2000 g/t, and 2400 g/t, respectively, to investigate the influence of kerosene consumption on the flotation indexes. The test process is shown in Figure 13, and the test results are shown in Figure 14.
Figure 14 shows that with the increase in kerosene consumption, the Au grade and recovery rate in the concentrate gradually increased. When the kerosene consumption increased from 800 g/t to 2000 g/t, the Au grade in the concentrate gradually increased from 39.89 g/t to 49.41 g/t, and the Au recovery rate gradually increased from 55.44% to 61.18%. When the kerosene consumption was further increased to 2400 g/t, the Au grade in the concentrate was almost unchanged, and the Au recovery rate increased to 65.64%. The results show that the addition of kerosene improved the surface properties of sulfide ore, enhanced the adsorption of the collector to sulfide ore, and produced a synergistic effect [27,32]. The influence of kerosene consumption on the concentrate index and economic benefit was analyzed comprehensively, and the appropriate kerosene consumption was determined to be 2000 g/t.

3.2.3. Activator Dosage Condition Test

Under the conditions of the fineness of grinding at −0.074 mm, accounting for 85% of the natural pH of the pulp, the dosage of kerosene was 2000 g/t, the dosage of isoamyl xanthate was 300 g/t (Fr 100 g/t, Sr 100 g/t, Fs 50 g/t, Ss 50 g/t), and the dosage of 2# oil was 160 g/t (Fr and Sr 50 g/t, Fs and Ss 30 g/t), The dosage of the selected activator copper sulfate was 300 g/t (Fr 100 g/, Sr 200 g/t), 400 g/t (200 g/t, 200 g/t), 500 g/t (300 g/t, 200 g/t), 600 g/t (400 g/t, 200 g/t), and 700 g/t (500 g/t, 200 g/t) to investigate the effect of copper sulfate dosage on the flotation index. The test process is shown in Figure 15, and the results are shown in Figure 16.
The results in Figure 16 show that with the increase in the amount of activator, the Au grade in the concentrate firstly increased and then decreased, and then tended to be stable. There was no significant change in the Au recovery rate. When the amount of activator copper sulfate was 400 g/t, the concentrate obtained had the highest Au grade of 40.64 g/t. The influence of the amount of copper sulfate on the concentrate index was analyzed comprehensively, and the appropriate amount of copper sulfate was determined to be 400 g/t.

3.2.4. Pulp pH Condition Test

This section intends to adjust the pH of the pulp by adding sulfuric acid and sodium carbonate and then investigate the influence of the pH of the pulp on the sorting index. Under the condition that the grinding fineness was −0.074 mm, accounting for 85%, the amount of kerosene was 2000 g/t, the amount of copper sulfate was 400 g/t (Fr 200 g/t, Sr 200 g/t), the amount of isoamyl xanthate was 200 g/t (Fr and Sr are 100 g/t), and the amount of 2# oil was 100 g/t (Fr and Sr are 50 g/t). The dosages of sulfuric acid and sodium carbonate were selected as 1000 g/t and 200 g/t, respectively, to investigate the effect of the dosages of sulfuric acid and sodium carbonate on the flotation index. The test process is shown in Figure 17, and the results are shown in Figure 18.
The results in Figure 18 show that with the increase in the pulp’s pH value, the Au grade and Au recovery in the concentrate generally showed a trend of first decreasing and then increasing. When the pulp’s pH was 9.44, that is, the amount of sodium carbonate was 1000 g/t, the Au grade in the concentrate reached the maximum, which was 49.85 g/t, and the Au recovery was 70.84%. In addition, sodium carbonate is a good dispersant to prevent the agglomeration of fine mud in the pulp and improve the selectivity of the flotation process [33,34], so it is determined that the adjustment agent of sodium carbonate could be added to the pulp at 1000 g/t.

3.2.5. Collector Dosage Condition Test

In order to test the efficiency and save costs, the flotation effect can be reflected according to the roughing index. As a grinding fineness of −0.074 mm accounted for 85%, the sodium carbonate dosage was 1000 g/t, kerosene dosage was 2000 g/t, copper sulfate dosage was 400 g/t (Fr 200 g/t, Sr 200 g/t), and 2# oil dosage was 100 g/t (Fr 50 g/t, Sr 50 g/t). The dosage of isoamyl xanthate as the collector was 100 g/t (Fr, Sr 50 g/t), 150 g/t (75 g/t, 75 g/t), 200 g/t (100 g/t, 100 g/t), 250 g/t (125 g/t, 125 g/t), 300 g/t (125 g/t, 125 g/t), respectively. Under the conditions of 300 g/t (150 g/t, 150 g/t), the influence law of the amount of the collector on the flotation index was investigated. The test process is shown in Figure 19, and the results are shown in Figure 20.
Figure 20 shows the influence of the amount of collector on the Au index for the coarse concentrate. It can be seen from the figure that with the increase in the amount of the collector, the Au grade in the coarse concentrate gradually decreased while the Au recovery gradually increased. With the increase in the amount of the collector, more gold minerals and gangue minerals entered the coarse concentrate, resulting in the recovery of Au in the coarse concentrate, which gradually increased, while the grade of Au gradually decreased. When the amount of the collector increased from 100 g/t to 300 g/t, the Au grade in the coarse concentrate gradually decreased from 30.28 g/t to 22.18 g/t, and the Au recovery gradually increased from 82.36% to 86.85%. The influence rule of the amount of collector on the coarse concentrate index was analyzed comprehensively, and the appropriate amount of the collector was determined to be 250 g/t.

3.2.6. Foaming Agent Dosage Condition Test

The fineness of grinding accounted for 85% of −0.074 mm; the dosage of sodium carbonate was 1000 g/t, the dosage of kerosene was 2000 g/t, the dosage of copper sulfate was 400 g/t (Fr 200 g/t, Sr 200 g/t), and the dosage of isoamyl xanthate was 250 g/t (Fr 125 g/t, Sr 125 g/t). The dosage of foaming agent 2# oil was 80 g/t (Fr 30 g/t, Sr 50 g/t), 100 g/t (50 g/t, 50 g/t), 120 g/t (70 g/t, 50 g/t), 140 g/t (90 g/t, 50 g/t), 160 g/t (110 g/t, 50 g/t), respectively. The influence law of the foaming agent dosage on the flotation index was investigated. The test process is shown in Figure 21, and the results are shown in Figure 22.
It can be seen from Figure 22 that with the increase in the dosage of the foaming agent, the Au grade in coarse concentrates showed a gradually decreasing trend, while the recovery rate showed a slowly increasing trend. When the dosage of the foaming agent increased from 80 g/t to 120 g/t, the recovery rate of Au increased from 84.52% to 87.89%. When the dosage of the foaming agent further increased to 160 g/t, the Au recovery tended to be flat and remained basically unchanged. When the dosage of the foaming agent increased from 80 g/t to 160 g/t, the Au grade in the coarse concentrate gradually decreased from 29.74 g/t to 26.60 g/t. The influence of the foaming agent dosage on the coarse concentrate index was analyzed comprehensively, and the appropriate foaming agent dosage was determined to be 120 g/t (70 g/t for primary crude and 50 g/t for secondary crude).

3.3. The Closed-Circuit Flotation Test

Under the optimum flotation reagent system, the flotation closed-circuit test was carried out in order to obtain the ideal separation index. In order to further obtain the ideal index, this process was optimized on the basis of the conditional test, and one more selection was added. Finally, the closed-circuit flotation process of “two roughing, three cleaning and two scavenging” was adopted. The closed-circuit flotation test results are shown in Figure 23.
From the closed-circuit flow chart, we know that after the “two roughing, three cleaning and two scavenging” flotation closed-circuit process, the concentrate Au grade of 42.83 g/t and Au recovery rate of 91.02% could be obtained, reaching the technical target required by the contract. The final tailings contained 0.58 g/t Au, and the recovery rate of Au was 8.98%. The above test results show that the gold minerals in the ore effectively recovered. The flotation separation of gold and gangue minerals was realized.

3.4. Property Analysis of Flotation Concentrate and Tailings

Table 4 shows that the content of Au and Ag in the flotation concentrate was 42.83 g/t and 71.70 g/t, respectively. The contents of TFe and S were 24.47% and 29.70%, respectively. In addition, it also contained the elements of C and As, whose contents are 3.0% and 2.72%, respectively. The content of Au in the flotation tailing was only 0.58 g/t, the content of Ag was less than 1 g/t, and the contents of other metal elements, such as S, C, and As, were low. According to the results of concentrate and tailing data, it can be shown that the separation of gold-bearing minerals was effectively realized.
Through the analysis of flotation concentrate and tailing properties from Table 4, we know that the grade and recovery rate of the gold concentrate are high and can meet the production requirements. This shows that when using kerosene as an auxiliary collector combined with xanthate flotation, the harmful impurities C and As had little impact on the flotation results. In fact, due to the addition of kerosene, it can effectively adhere to the surface of graphite or organic carbon, forming carbon–oil clusters. The cluster itself has a collector property for gold, forming carbon–oil–gold aggregates, thereby increasing the probability of gold-adhering bubbles, as shown in Figure 24 [35,36]. At the same time, this carbon–oil agglomeration can also reduce the amount of xanthate and avoid the adsorption of xanthate by graphite or organic carbon, thus reducing the collection effect [22,37]. However, this carbon–oil–gold cluster can enter the gold mining product together, and another part of the carbon and arsenic in the raw ore enters the concentrate, combined with mineralogy analysis; this is because another part of carbon is embedded in the sulfide ore and arsenopyrite, as a gold carrier, is difficult to be effectively separated via ordinary grinding and flotation [31,38]. Significantly, the C and As in the gold concentrate can have an impact on the subsequent gold-leaching treatment, causing a gold-robbing effect or reacting with the gold-leaching agent [9,39]. Therefore, for the gold concentrate containing carbon and arsenic, we removed the harmful elements such as C and As during pretreatment and then carried out leaching for gold extraction [40,41,42]. Since C and As are enriched in the concentrate, it can be seen from Figure 23 that the concentrate yield was 12.07%, which is greatly reduced compared with the raw ore concentrate. Hence, the direct treatment of gold concentrate can effectively reduce the energy consumption of pretreatment and the dosage of chemicals in the leaching process.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, the mineral technology of the Fengcheng carbon–arsenic refractory gold ore was studied. According to the mineral characteristics, kerosene was used as the auxiliary collector, the best reagent system and technological process were determined, and the auxiliary mechanism and subsequent treatment were preliminarily analyzed according to the test products. The main conclusions are as follows:
(1)
The content of Au in the ore is 5.68 g/t, and the main minerals are quartz, muscovite, pyrite, and arsenopyrite, whose contents are 35.68%, 36.13%, 8.94%, and 1.05%, respectively. The gold ores are natural gold with a fine distribution and are mainly sulfide-coated gold, accounting for 79.46%. The main sulfide is pyrite, followed by arsenopyrite. The carbon content is 1.01%, and the main form is organic carbon.
(2)
The appropriate flotation process was determined as “two roughing, three cleaning and two scavenging”, and the reasonable grinding fineness were determined to be 85% of −0.074 mm. The flotation of the minerals was effectively separated using kerosene and collector flotation. The diversified utilization of kerosene was realized, which is of great significance for reducing mineral processing costs and ensuring environmental protection.
(3)
By using this experimental process, the concentrate with a Au grade of 42.83 g/t and recovery rate of 91.02% was obtained, and the contents of TFe and S were relatively high at 24.47% and 29.70%, respectively. In the final tailings, the Au grade was only 0.52 g/t, and the Ag content was <1 g/t; the TFe content was 2.62%. The contents of other metal elements, such As, S, and C, were low.
In summary, the above test results show that kerosene as an auxiliary collector can effectively recover gold-bearing sulfide ore in refractory ores and realize the separation of gold and gangue. It is helpful in obtaining beneficiation costs, environmental protection, and the subsequent gold-leaching process.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.S. and J.Y.; methodology, X.S.; software, J.Y.; validation, J.Y., H.S. and X.S.; formal analysis, J.J.; investigation, X.S.; resources, X.S.; data curation, X.S.; writing—original draft preparation, X.S.; writing—review and editing, Y.L.; visualization, J.J.; supervision, J.Y.; project administration, Y.L.; funding acquisition, Y.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52074068).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cao, P.; Zhang, S.; Zheng, Y.; Lai, S.; Liang, G.; Wang, X.; Tan, B. Identification of elements hindering gold leaching from gold-bearing dust and selection of gold extraction process. Hydrometallurgy 2021, 202, 105612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yang, T.; Rao, S.; Liu, W.; Zhang, D.; Chen, L. A selective process for extracting antimony from refractory gold ore. Hydrometallurgy 2017, 169, 571–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, S.-H.; Zheng, Y.-J.; Cao, P.; Li, C.-H.; Lai, S.-Z.; Wang, X.-J. Process mineralogy characteristics of acid leaching residue produced in low-temperature roasting-acid leaching pretreatment process of refractory gold concentrates. Int. J. Miner. Met. Mater. 2018, 25, 1132–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, J.; Yang, H.; Zhao, R.; Tong, L.; Chen, Q. Mineralogical characteristics and recovery process optimization analysis of a refractory gold ore with gold particles mainly encapsulated in pyrite and Arsenopyrite. Geochemistry 2023, 83, 125941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hao, F.; Du, J.; Peng, L.; Zhang, M.; Dong, Z.; Shen, Y.; Zhao, L. Selective and Effective Gold Recovery from Printed Circuit Boards and Gold Slag Using Amino-Acid-Functionalized Cellulose Microspheres. Polymers 2023, 15, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, J.; Kou, J.; Sun, C.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, H. A review of environmentally friendly gold lixiviants: Fundamentals, applications, and commonalities. Miner. Eng. 2023, 197, 108074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ministry of Natural Resources of China. China Mineral Resources Report; Geology Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2022; pp. 6–7.
  8. Ubaldini, S.; Vegliò, F.; Beolchini, F.; Toro, L.; Abbruzzese, C. Gold recovery from a refractory pyrrhotite ore by biooxidation. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2000, 60, 247–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wu, H.; Feng, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, H.; Ju, J. Co-recovery of manganese from pyrolusite and gold from carbonaceous gold ore using fluidized roasting coupling technology. Chem. Eng. Process. Process. Intensif. 2020, 147, 107742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pyke, B.; Johnston, R.; Brooks, P. The characterisation and behaviour of carbonaceous material in a refractory gold bearing ore. Miner. Eng. 1999, 12, 851–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Santiago, R.; Ladeira, A. Reduction of preg-robbing activity of carbonaceous gold ores with the utilization of surface blinding additives. Miner. Eng. 2019, 131, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhao, J.; Pring, A. Mineral Transformations in Gold–(Silver) Tellurides in the Presence of Fluids: Nature and Experiment. Minerals 2019, 9, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Andreeva, E.D.; Matsueda, H.; Okrugin, V.M.; Takahashi, R.; Ono, S. Au–Ag–Te Mineralization of the Low-Sulfidation Epithermal Aginskoe Deposit, Central Kamchatka, Russia. Resour. Geol. 2013, 63, 337–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Qin, H.; Guo, X.-Y.; Tian, Q.-H.; Zhang, L. Recovery of gold from refractory gold ores: Effect of pyrite on the stability of the thiourea leaching system. Int. J. Miner. Met. Mater. 2021, 28, 956–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sitando, O.; Senanayake, G.; Dai, X.; Breuer, P. The adsorption of gold(I) on minerals and activated carbon (preg-robbing) in non-ammoniacal thiosulfate solutions—Effect of calcium thiosulfate, silver(I), copper(I) and polythionate ions. Hydrometallurgy 2019, 184, 206–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nazari, A.M.; Ghahreman, A.; Bell, S. A comparative study of gold refractoriness by the application of QEMSCAN and diagnostic leach process. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2017, 169, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, H.; Xiao, W.; Jin, J.; Han, Y. Oxidation Roasting of Fine-Grained Carbonaceous Gold Ore: The Effect of Aeration Rate. Minerals 2021, 11, 558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jin, J.; Han, Y.; Li, H.; Huai, Y.; Peng, Y.; Gu, X.; Yang, W. Mineral phase and structure changes during roasting of fine-grained carbonaceous gold ores and their effects on gold leaching efficiency. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2019, 27, 1184–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, X.; Li, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, T.; Yang, Y.; Xu, B.; He, Y. Improving gold recovery from a refractory ore via Na2SO4 assisted roasting and alkaline Na2S leaching. Hydrometallurgy 2019, 185, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cilek, E.C.; Tuzci, G. Flotation behavior of native gold and gold-bearing sulfide minerals in a polymetallic gold ore. Part. Sci. Technol. 2022, 40, 558–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, W.-J.; Liu, S.; Song, Y.-S.; Wen, J.-K.; Zhou, G.-Y.; Chen, Y. Comprehensive recovery of gold and base-metal sulfide minerals from a low-grade refractory ore. Int. J. Miner. Met. Mater. 2016, 23, 1377–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lee, S.; Gibson, C.; Borschneck, A.; Ghahreman, A. Transformer oil vs. kerosene: Selective collectors for C-matter flotation from a double refractory gold ore. Miner. Eng. 2023, 191, 107951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kemppinen, J.; Aaltonen, A.; Sihvonen, T.; Leppinen, J.; Sirén, H. Xanthate degradation occurring in flotation process waters of a gold concentrator plant. Miner. Eng. 2015, 80, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Monte, M.; Lins, F.; Oliveira, J. Selective flotation of gold from pyrite under oxidizing conditions. Int. J. Miner. Process. 1997, 51, 255–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, J.; Yoon, R.-H.; Morris, J. AFM surface force measurements conducted between gold surfaces treated in xanthate solutions. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2013, 122, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Woods, R.; Hope, G.A.; Brown, G.M. Spectroelectrochemical investigations of the interaction of ethyl xanthate with copper, silver and gold: III. SERS of xanthate adsorbed on gold surfaces. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 1998, 137, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lee, S.; Gibson, C.E.; Ghahreman, A. The Separation of Carbonaceous Matter from Refractory Gold Ore Using Multi-Stage Flotation: A Case Study. Minerals 2021, 11, 1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Saleh, S.; Said, S.; El-Shahawi, M. Extraction and recovery of Au, Sb and Sn from electrorefined solid waste. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 436, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wu, X.-Q.; Monhemius, A.J.; Gochin, R.J. Relationship between attachment probability and surface energy in adhesion process of gold particles to oil-carbon agglomerates. J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 2003, 10, 318–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mu, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Peng, Y. The interaction of grinding media and collector in pyrite flotation at alkaline pH. Miner. Eng. 2020, 152, 106344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rabieh, A.; Albijanic, B.; Eksteen, J. A review of the effects of grinding media and chemical conditions on the flotation of pyrite in refractory gold operations. Miner. Eng. 2016, 94, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, H.; Liu, M.X.; Liu, Q. Oil-assisted flotation of fine hematite using sodium oleate or hydroxamic acids as a collector. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 2018, 54, 1130–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Alm, H.K.; Ström, G.; Karlstrom, K.; Schoelkopf, J.; Gane, P.A.C. Effect of excess dispersant on surface properties and liquid interactions on calcium carbonate containing coatings. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 2010, 25, 82–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kupka, N.; Rudolph, M. Role of sodium carbonate in scheelite flotation—A multi-faceted reagent. Miner. Eng. 2018, 129, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wu, X.; Gochin, R.; Monhemius, A. The adhesion of gold to oil–carbon agglomerates. Miner. Eng. 2004, 17, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wu, X.; Gochin, R.; Monhemius, A. Modelling gold particle adhesion to oil–carbon agglomerates. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2004, 74, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gredelj, S.; Zanin, M.; Grano, S. Selective flotation of carbon in the Pb–Zn carbonaceous sulphide ores of Century Mine, Zinifex. Miner. Eng. 2009, 22, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ng, W.S.; Wang, Q.; Chen, M. A review of Preg-robbing and the impact of chloride ions in the pressure oxidation of double refractory ores. Miner. Process. Extr. Met. Rev. 2022, 43, 69–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tan, H.; Feng, D.; Lukey, G.C.; van Deventer, J.S.J. The behaviour of carbonaceous matter in cyanide leaching of gold. Hydrometallurgy 2005, 78, 226–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Meng, Y.Q. Pretreatment and thiosulfate leaching of refractory gold-bearing arsenosulfide concentrates. J. Univ. Sci. Technol. Beijing 2005, 12, 385–389. [Google Scholar]
  41. Piervandi, Z. Pretreatment of refractory gold minerals by ozonation before the cyanidation process: A review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 109013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Su, X.; Mo, W.; Ma, S.; Yang, J.; Lin, M. Experimental Study on Microwave Pretreatment with Some Refractory Flotation Gold Concentrate; International Forum on Powder Technology & Application: Qingdao, China, 2011; pp. 71–75. [Google Scholar]
Separations 10 00584 g001
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction spectra of the raw minerals.
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction spectra of the raw minerals.
Separations 10 00584 g001
Separations 10 00584 g002
Figure 2. (a) Research schematic diagram and (b) flotation process flow chart.
Figure 2. (a) Research schematic diagram and (b) flotation process flow chart.
Separations 10 00584 g002
Separations 10 00584 g003
Figure 3. Mineral mass fraction of the gold ore. (Q-quartz, Mu-muscovite, Py-pyrite, Ar-arsenopyrite, Pl-plagioclase, Po-potash feldspar, Ca-calcite, Do-dolomite, Ch-chlorite, Bi-Biotite, Ot-others).
Figure 3. Mineral mass fraction of the gold ore. (Q-quartz, Mu-muscovite, Py-pyrite, Ar-arsenopyrite, Pl-plagioclase, Po-potash feldspar, Ca-calcite, Do-dolomite, Ch-chlorite, Bi-Biotite, Ot-others).
Separations 10 00584 g003
Separations 10 00584 g004
Figure 4. Occurrence state of gold particles in gold mine. (a–c) Natural gold monomer particles; (d) Backscattered gold monomer particles.
Figure 4. Occurrence state of gold particles in gold mine. (a–c) Natural gold monomer particles; (d) Backscattered gold monomer particles.
Separations 10 00584 g004
Separations 10 00584 g005aSeparations 10 00584 g005b
Figure 5. Microtopography of pyrite in gold mine. (a) Fine grained pyrite; (b) Hemidiomorphic pyrite; (c) Fine flaky pyrite; (d) Rod pyrite; (e) Disseminated pyrite; (f) Striped pyrite; (g,h) Carbon is filled with pyrite; (i) Pyrite, arsenopyrite and Muscovite are closely connected; (j) Pyrite is associated with quartz and chlorite ((i)—1-muscovite, 2-pyrite, 3-arsenopyrite) ((j)—1-quartz, 2-chlorite, 3-pyrite) (G-gangue).
Figure 5. Microtopography of pyrite in gold mine. (a) Fine grained pyrite; (b) Hemidiomorphic pyrite; (c) Fine flaky pyrite; (d) Rod pyrite; (e) Disseminated pyrite; (f) Striped pyrite; (g,h) Carbon is filled with pyrite; (i) Pyrite, arsenopyrite and Muscovite are closely connected; (j) Pyrite is associated with quartz and chlorite ((i)—1-muscovite, 2-pyrite, 3-arsenopyrite) ((j)—1-quartz, 2-chlorite, 3-pyrite) (G-gangue).
Separations 10 00584 g005aSeparations 10 00584 g005b
Separations 10 00584 g006
Figure 6. Diagram of dissociation and the associative relationship of pyrite (MLA of pyrite).
Figure 6. Diagram of dissociation and the associative relationship of pyrite (MLA of pyrite).
Separations 10 00584 g006
Separations 10 00584 g007
Figure 7. Pyrite size distribution map.
Figure 7. Pyrite size distribution map.
Separations 10 00584 g007
Separations 10 00584 g008aSeparations 10 00584 g008b
Figure 8. Microtopography of arsenopyrite in gold mine. (a) Fine grained arsenopyrite; (b,c) Pyrite is associated with arsenopyrite; (d) Arsenopyrite is around the pyrite; (e) Arsenopyrite is connected with Muscovite; (f) Arsenopyrite is coated with pyrite ((e)—1-muscovite, 2-arsenite) ((f)—1-muscovite, 2-pyrite, 3-arsenopyrite) (G-gangue).
Figure 8. Microtopography of arsenopyrite in gold mine. (a) Fine grained arsenopyrite; (b,c) Pyrite is associated with arsenopyrite; (d) Arsenopyrite is around the pyrite; (e) Arsenopyrite is connected with Muscovite; (f) Arsenopyrite is coated with pyrite ((e)—1-muscovite, 2-arsenite) ((f)—1-muscovite, 2-pyrite, 3-arsenopyrite) (G-gangue).
Separations 10 00584 g008aSeparations 10 00584 g008b
Separations 10 00584 g009
Figure 9. Microtopography of carbon in gold mine. (a) Microflake carbon; (b) Carbon is distributed between pyrite and gangue mineral.
Figure 9. Microtopography of carbon in gold mine. (a) Microflake carbon; (b) Carbon is distributed between pyrite and gangue mineral.
Separations 10 00584 g009
Separations 10 00584 g010
Figure 10. Microtopography of quartz in gold min. (a) Quartzis associated with muscovite (Ms)and sericite (Ser) (b) Feldspar (Fs) and quartz (Q) symbiosis, intergranular and pore filled with carbonate minerals (Cal).
Figure 10. Microtopography of quartz in gold min. (a) Quartzis associated with muscovite (Ms)and sericite (Ser) (b) Feldspar (Fs) and quartz (Q) symbiosis, intergranular and pore filled with carbonate minerals (Cal).
Separations 10 00584 g010
Separations 10 00584 g011
Figure 11. Test flow of grinding fineness condition.
Figure 11. Test flow of grinding fineness condition.
Separations 10 00584 g011
Separations 10 00584 g012
Figure 12. Influence of grinding fineness on Au separation index in the concentrate.
Figure 12. Influence of grinding fineness on Au separation index in the concentrate.
Separations 10 00584 g012
Separations 10 00584 g013
Figure 13. Kerosene dosage condition test flow.
Figure 13. Kerosene dosage condition test flow.
Separations 10 00584 g013
Separations 10 00584 g014
Figure 14. Influence of kerosene dosage on Au separation index in the concentration.
Figure 14. Influence of kerosene dosage on Au separation index in the concentration.
Separations 10 00584 g014
Separations 10 00584 g015
Figure 15. Active agent dosage condition test flow.
Figure 15. Active agent dosage condition test flow.
Separations 10 00584 g015
Separations 10 00584 g016
Figure 16. Influence of activator dosage on Au separation index in concentration.
Figure 16. Influence of activator dosage on Au separation index in concentration.
Separations 10 00584 g016
Separations 10 00584 g017
Figure 17. pH condition test flow.
Figure 17. pH condition test flow.
Separations 10 00584 g017
Separations 10 00584 g018
Figure 18. Influence of pH on Au separation index in concentration.
Figure 18. Influence of pH on Au separation index in concentration.
Separations 10 00584 g018
Separations 10 00584 g019
Figure 19. Collector dosage condition test flow.
Figure 19. Collector dosage condition test flow.
Separations 10 00584 g019
Separations 10 00584 g020
Figure 20. Influence of collector dosage on Au separation index in the concentration.
Figure 20. Influence of collector dosage on Au separation index in the concentration.
Separations 10 00584 g020
Separations 10 00584 g021
Figure 21. Foaming agent dosage condition test flow.
Figure 21. Foaming agent dosage condition test flow.
Separations 10 00584 g021
Separations 10 00584 g022
Figure 22. Influence of foaming agent dosage on Au separation index in concentrate.
Figure 22. Influence of foaming agent dosage on Au separation index in concentrate.
Separations 10 00584 g022
Separations 10 00584 g023
Figure 23. Flotation closed circuit process.
Figure 23. Flotation closed circuit process.
Separations 10 00584 g023
Separations 10 00584 g024
Figure 24. Carbon–oil cluster diagram.
Figure 24. Carbon–oil cluster diagram.
Separations 10 00584 g024
Table 1. Chemical composition analysis results of raw minerals (%).
Table 1. Chemical composition analysis results of raw minerals (%).
ElementsAu (g/t)Ag (g/t)TFeSiO2Al2O3CaO
Content/%5.688.765.0858.2814.512.22
ElementsMgOAsPbSC
Content/%2.350.3640.0113.901.02
Table 2. Results of phase analysis of Au.
Table 2. Results of phase analysis of Au.
Nudity and
Semi-Exposed
Gold		Carbonate
Coated
Gold		Brown Iron
Coated Gold		Sulphide
Coated Gold		Silicate
Coated Gold		Total
Content/g × t−10.240.210.265.340.676.72
Occupancy/%3.573.133.8779.469.97100.00
Table 3. Results of phase analysis of C.
Table 3. Results of phase analysis of C.
Carbon in CarbonateOrganic CarbonGraphite CarbonTotal Carbon
Content/%0.240.210.265.34
Occupancy/%3.573.133.8779.46
Table 4. Properties of flotation concentrate and tailing.
Table 4. Properties of flotation concentrate and tailing.
ElementsAu (g/t)Ag (g/t)TFeSCAs
Content/%42.8371.7024.4729.703.02.72
ElementsAu (g/t)Ag (g/t)TFeSCAs
Content/%0.58<12.620.1170.7970.031
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, X.; Yu, J.; Jin, J.; Sun, H.; Li, Y.; Han, Y. Using Kerosene as an Auxiliary Collector to Recover Gold from Refractory Gold Ore Based on Mineralogical Characteristics. Separations 2023, 10, 584. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10120584

AMA Style

Sun X, Yu J, Jin J, Sun H, Li Y, Han Y. Using Kerosene as an Auxiliary Collector to Recover Gold from Refractory Gold Ore Based on Mineralogical Characteristics. Separations. 2023; 10(12):584. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10120584

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Xuesong, Jianwen Yu, Jianping Jin, Hao Sun, Yanjun Li, and Yuexin Han. 2023. "Using Kerosene as an Auxiliary Collector to Recover Gold from Refractory Gold Ore Based on Mineralogical Characteristics" Separations 10, no. 12: 584. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10120584

APA Style

Sun, X., Yu, J., Jin, J., Sun, H., Li, Y., & Han, Y. (2023). Using Kerosene as an Auxiliary Collector to Recover Gold from Refractory Gold Ore Based on Mineralogical Characteristics. Separations, 10(12), 584. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10120584

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop