Next Article in Journal
Research on the Flotation Mechanism of Microemulsion Collector Enhanced Removal of Dyeing Impurities from Phosphogypsum
Previous Article in Journal
A Compact Instrument for Temperature-Programming-Assisted Capillary–Nanoliquid Chromatography
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Kinetics of Supercritical CO2 Extraction from Burrito (Aloysia polystachya) Leaves and Sucupira-Preta (Bowdichia virgilioides) Seeds

by
Gabrielle Vaz Vieira
1,
Michel Rubens dos Reis Souza
2,
Carlos Toshiyuki Hiranobe
1,
José Eduardo Goncalves
3,
Cristiane Mengue Feniman Moritz
4,
Otávio Akira Sakai
5,
Leila Maria Sotocorno e Silva
6,
Michael Jones da Silva
1,
Erivaldo Antônio da Silva
7,
Renivaldo José dos Santos
6,
Edson Antônio da Silva
8,
Lucio Cardozo-Filho
1,9 and
Leandro Ferreira-Pinto
1,*
1
Department of Engineering, School of Engineering and Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rosana 19274-000, SP, Brazil
2
Institute of Technology and Research (ITP), Aracaju 49010-390, SE, Brazil
3
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Tecnologias Limpas, Universidade Cesumar e Instituto Cesumar de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (ICETI), Maringá 87050-900, PR, Brazil
4
Department of Technology, State University of Maringá, Umuarama Regional Campus, Umuarama 87506-370, PR, Brazil
5
Federal Institute of Paraná (IFPR), Umuarama 87507-014, PR, Brazil
6
Postgraduate Program in Science and Technology of Materials (POSMAT), School of Engineering and Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rosana 19274-000, SP, Brazil
7
Department of Cartography, School of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Presidente Prudente 19060-900, SP, Brazil
8
Centro de Engenharias e Ciências Exatas, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Toledo 85903-220, PR, Brazil
9
Programa de Pós-graduação em Engenharia Química, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá 870200-900, PR, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Separations 2025, 12(1), 6; https://doi.org/10.3390/separations12010006
Submission received: 1 December 2024 / Revised: 23 December 2024 / Accepted: 23 December 2024 / Published: 31 December 2024

Abstract

:
This study investigated the application of supercritical carbon dioxide (CO2) for the extraction of essential oils from plant materials with anxiolytic potential, focusing on the leaves of burrito (Aloysia polystachya) and the seeds of sucupira-preta (Bowdichia virgilioides). The supercritical extraction technique was chosen for its ability to produce high-purity extracts without residual solvents and to reduce the environmental impact. This study evaluated the influence of temperature (40 °C, 50 °C, and 60 °C) and pressure (22 MPa, 25 MPa, and 28 MPa) on extraction efficiency using a 22 factorial design with triplicates at the central point. The maximum yields were 1.2% for burrito leaves and 4.2% for sucupira-preta seeds. Despite their relatively low yields, the extracts contained a diverse range of chemical compounds, including fatty acids (oleic, linoleic, and palmitic acids), squalene, β-carotene, vitamin E, and other bioactive molecules with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory properties. Statistical analysis demonstrated that pressure was the most influential factor affecting yield, whereas temperature played a secondary role. The Sovová kinetic model provided a good fit for the extraction curves, with determination coefficients (R2) above 0.95, thus validating the efficiency of the method. These results highlight the pharmaceutical potential of these extracts, particularly for therapeutic and anxiolytic purposes.

1. Introduction

Anxiety disorders are among the most prevalent mental health conditions worldwide and are characterized by excessive worry, fear, and physiological responses that can significantly impair daily functioning. While pharmacological treatments, such as benzodiazepines and antidepressants, are effective in managing anxiety symptoms, their use is often associated with adverse effects, including sedation, dependence, amnesia, sexual dysfunction, and gastrointestinal disturbances [1].
These limitations highlight the urgent need for alternative therapeutic approaches that are both effective and safe. Medicinal plants have emerged as promising sources of bioactive compounds with anxiolytic potential, offering a natural and potentially less harmful alternative to conventional drugs [2,3]. Therefore, there is a need to develop new anxiolytic drugs that do not produce these side effects. In this context, medicinal plants continue to demonstrate potential as anxiolytic agents [4].
The therapeutic potential of plants in the treatment of central nervous system disorders, including anxiety, has been well documented in traditional medicine. Many plant species synthesize secondary metabolites, such as terpenes, flavonoids, and alkaloids, which exhibit diverse pharmacological activities, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and psychotropic effects [5]. These compounds are often produced as part of the plant defense mechanisms against environmental stressors, and their chemical diversity makes them valuable candidates for drug development. Essential oils and other bioactive constituents have shown particular promise in modulating the central nervous system, with several studies highlighting their anxiolytic properties [5,6,7,8,9].
Two plant species of particular interest are Bowdichia virgilioides (commonly known as sucupira-preta) and Aloysia polystachya (burrito). Both plants are widely used in traditional medicine and have been recognized for their pharmacological properties, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and sedative effects [10].
Bowdichia virgilioides, a species native to South America, is traditionally used to treat rheumatism, arthritis, and skin diseases. Its seeds are rich in bioactive compounds, including fatty acids (e.g., oleic and linoleic acids), squalene, and flavonoids, which have been associated with anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and neuroprotective effects [5,11]. In traditional medicine, its seeds are used to treat rheumatism, arthritis, and skin diseases, whereas its bark is used as an antidiabetic agent and for the topical treatment of inflammation [12]. Although there have been few scientific studies on the biological activity of this species, some reports have demonstrated its antimalarial properties [13], antinociceptive effects in peripheral analgesia models [14], and anti-inflammatory activities [14]. The specialized literature indicates the presence of various components of this species, including essential oils [15], alkaloids [16], flavonoids [17], triterpenoids, and resins [18]. Vieira et al. [11] reported that the secondary metabolites of sucupira-preta have significant potential as anxiolytics.
Aloysia polystachya is an aromatic plant native to the Verbenaceae family and is widely distributed in the subtropical regions of South America, particularly in Brazil, Paraguay, and northern Argentina. This species is commonly known as the burrito [19]. Its leaves and flowers are widely used in traditional medicine to treat gastrointestinal disorders, such as pain, nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia, and gastritis [20]. The therapeutic uses of Aloysia species include its use as a febrifuge, sedative, stomachic, diuretic, and antispasmodic [21]. Studies have indicated that the chemical composition of essential oils obtained from leaves includes monoterpenes, such as carvacrol, carvone, eucarvone, limonene, pinene, and sabinene [19,21]. Hellión-Ibarrola et al. [21] and Mora et al. [19] have suggested that Aloysia polystachya is a potential anxiolytic agent.
Despite the promising pharmacological potential of these plants, studies focusing on the optimization of extraction methods to maximize the yield and bioactivity of their compounds are lacking. Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) using carbon dioxide (CO2) has emerged as a green and efficient technique for obtaining high-purity extracts. This method offers several advantages over conventional extraction techniques, including the absence of residual solvents, reduced environmental impact, and the ability to operate under controlled temperature and pressure conditions to selectively extract desired compounds. Moreover, SFE is particularly suitable for preserving the integrity of thermolabile compounds, which are often present in essential oils and other bioactive plant metabolites [22,23,24,25].
This study aimed to investigate the application of supercritical CO2 extraction for the recovery of bioactive compounds from sucupira-preta seeds and burrito leaves, focusing on their potential anxiolytic properties. By evaluating the influence of temperature and pressure on extraction efficiency, this study sought to optimize the process conditions to enhance the yield and quality of the extracts. Additionally, this study employed the Sovová kinetic model to characterize the extraction process and provide insights into the mass transfer mechanisms involved. These findings are expected to contribute to the growing body of knowledge on the use of supercritical CO2 extraction for medicinal plants and support the development of phytotherapeutic products for anxiety management.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Sample Preparation

Plant materials, comprising burrito leaves (Aloysia polystachya) and sucupira-preta seeds (Bowdichia virgilioides), were obtained from the Pontal do Paranapanema region. These materials were dried in a ventilated oven at 105 °C for 24 h until a stable mass was reached [26,27]. After drying, the materials were ground using a domestic blender and sieved with W.S. Tyler sieves (Mentor, OH, USA). A particle size of 0.85 mm (20 mesh) was selected for sample preparation. The processed samples were vacuum-sealed in polyethylene bags and stored under freezing conditions. Particle density (ρt) was measured using a helium gas pycnometer (Ultrapyc 1200e, Quantachrome Instruments, Boynton Beach, FL, USA). Carbon dioxide with a purity of 99.9% in the liquid phase was supplied by Air Liquide S.A(Presidente Prudente, SP, Brazil).

2.2. Supercritical CO2 Extraction

Experimental procedures were carried out using a bench-scale extraction system comprising a CO2 cylinder, a thermostatically regulated bath, a syringe pump (ISCO 260D, Lincoln, NE, USA), and a jacketed extraction vessel made of 304 stainless steel (Figure 1). Additional details regarding the equipment and experimental methodologies can be found in previous studies [28,29].
The extractor was loaded with 0.01 kg of material, and the remaining void space in the extraction cell was filled with glass beads to form an inert bed. The CO2 introduced into the system initially passed through the inert bed before reaching the ground plant material. Once the desired extraction temperature was reached, the pump and extractor were pressurized simultaneously. After the operational pressure was established, the system was left to rest for 30 min to ensure equilibrium and confirm that the solvent was fully saturated at the start of the extraction process.
Extractions were carried out at pressures of 22, 25, and 28 MPa; temperatures of 40 °C, 50 °C, and 60 °C; and a CO2 flow rate of 2.0 mL min−1, following a 22 factorial design with triplicates at the central point (Table 1). The solvent flow rate of 2.0 mL min−1 was controlled using a micrometric valve (Parker Autoclave Engineers, Erie, PA, USA) and maintained at 100 °C. The total extract was collected in glass vials and weighed over six initial cycles of 5 min, followed by six to nine additional cycles of 10 min.

2.3. Oil Characterization

The extract samples were weighed using an analytical balance, diluted in dichloromethane (n = 3) to achieve a concentration of 1000 µg mL−1, and injected into the pre-defined chromatographic system.
For one-dimensional Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis, a Shimadzu gas chromatograph coupled with a mass spectrometer (model GCMS-QP2010 Plus, Kyoto, Japan) was employed. The system was equipped with an AOC-20i auto-sampler/auto-injector (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and a DB-5MS capillary column (50 m length, 0.25 mm internal diameter, and 0.25 µm stationary phase thickness). The temperature program began at 313.15 K, with a heating rate of 2 K min−1 up to 473.15 K, followed by a ramp of 10 K min−1 up to 573.15 K, where it was held for 15 min. The injector, interface, and ionization source temperatures were set to 523.15 K, 573.15 K, and 553.15 K, respectively. Helium gas (purity 99.999%) was used as the carrier at a flow rate of 0.8 mL min−1. A 1 µL injection (1000 µg mL−1) was performed in split mode with a split ratio of 1:50. Data acquisition and processing were conducted using the GCMS Postrun Analysis software (Ver.2.53, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), which incorporates the NIST14.lb and NIST14.lbs spectral library databases. Additional details regarding the equipment and experimental methodologies can be found in previous studies [29].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The dataset underwent an analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a 5% significance level, followed by Tukey test, which was performed using Statistica Software version 8.0 [30]. The main effects and interactions were examined using Design Expert software version 12 [31], which evaluates the primary effects, interactions, and influence of the independent variables on the response outcomes.

2.5. The Kinetics of the Extraction—Sovová Model

The Sovová model [32] explains the two stages of mass transfer and three distinct extraction phases. Phase 1: Extraction of easily accessible oil. This phase is primarily determined by the solubility of oil in the fluid phase and is represented by a linear curve, where the slope closely approximates the solubility of oil in the solvent. Phase 2: A reduction in the extraction rate occurred, followed by oil extraction, which is more difficult to access. This phase was controlled by an internal diffusion mechanism. Phase 3: The extraction curve became nearly linear again, but the extraction rate was considerably lower than that observed in the first phase.
The model establishes a comprehensive framework for analyzing the supercritical CO2 extraction process and supports the refinement of the extraction parameters for a wide range of plant materials. Additional details regarding the equipment and experimental methodologies can be found in previous studies [29].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Extraction Yield

The extraction yields obtained for burrito leaves (Aloysia polystachya) and sucupira-preta seeds (Bowdichia virgilioides) using supercritical CO2 are presented in Table 2. The maximum yield was 1.2% for burrito leaves and 4.2% for sucupira-preta seeds, which was achieved at 60 °C and 28 MPa. These results indicate that the sucupira-preta seed matrix exhibited a higher concentration of extractable compounds than the burrito leaves, which was expected because of the higher lipid content of the seeds.
Most of the extracts were recovered within the first 20 min of extraction, which was followed by a significant reduction in the extraction rate. This behavior is consistent with the Sovová kinetic model, which describes the transition from a convection-controlled regime to a diffusion-controlled regime. Statistical analysis identified pressure as the most significant factor influencing the extraction yield, whereas temperature had a secondary effect. This can be attributed to the increased density of CO2 at higher pressures, which enhances its solvating capacity and, consequently, the efficiency of the extraction process.
The extraction kinetic curves for burrito leaves and sucupira-preta seeds are presented in Figure 2 and Figure 3, respectively. These curves illustrate the cumulative yield as a function of extraction time adjusted according to the Sovová kinetic model. The extraction process was characterized by three distinct phases: an initial constant-rate phase, an intermediate falling-rate phase, and a final residual-rate phase. In the constant-rate phase, extraction was predominantly governed by convective mass transfer mechanisms in the fluid phase. As the process progressed, the falling-rate phase began, where the extraction rate decreased owing to the transition to diffusive mechanisms. Finally, in the residual-rate phase, the yield plateaued as the less accessible compounds were gradually extracted.
The Sovová model demonstrated a strong fit to the experimental data, with determination coefficients (R2) exceeding 0.95 for both matrices. The adjusted parameters, including the mass transfer coefficients and apparent solubility, are summarized in Table 3.
The changes in the slopes of the extraction kinetic curves reflect the transitions between convective and diffusive mass transfer mechanisms. Initially, the convective mechanism dominated, facilitating the rapid removal of easily accessible compounds. However, as extraction progressed, a discontinuity effect was observed on the surface layer, leading to a decline in the extraction rate. At this stage, the process becomes diffusion-controlled, and less accessible oils are extracted. This shift highlights the increasing challenges associated with the solubilization of these compounds.
In the Sovová model, the dimensionless parameters Z and W represent specific system characteristics, while S denotes solubility, and r refers to the mass of easily accessible oil. The mass transfer coefficients in the solvent phase (KFa) were higher than those in the solid phase (KSa), indicating that the easily accessible oil contributed more significantly to the extraction yield. The lower KSa values, compared to KFa, underscore the greater difficulty associated with the diffusion process and the extraction of less accessible oils, as corroborated by previous studies [33,34,35,36]. The parameters tCER and tFER represent, respectively, the point at which oil extraction from within the particles begins and the point at which the easily accessible crude compounds are extracted. The coefficient of determination (R2) serves as a statistical measure of the model accuracy in fitting the experimental data.
The response surfaces shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5 illustrate the combined influence of temperature and pressure on extraction yields. Statistical analysis confirmed that pressure was the most significant factor affecting the extraction yield, whereas temperature had a secondary but still relevant effect. The adjusted equations for the extraction yields are presented in following equations, which demonstrate that increasing the pressure has a more pronounced positive impact on the yields for both plant matrices.
Yield_Burrito = 0.9414 + 0.0400 T + 0.1700 P + 0.0050 T * P
Yield_Sucupira-preta = 3.99 + 0.0250 T + 0.1450 P − 0.0050 T * P
These equations indicate that increasing the pressure had a more pronounced positive impact on the extraction yields for both matrices.
The statistical analysis results, summarized in Table 4, further validated the influence of temperature (T) and pressure (P) on the extraction yields. A significant linear model was observed for both variables across the studied plant matrices, highlighting their critical roles in determining the outcomes of the extraction process. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) confirmed the statistical significance of the models, with R2 values exceeding 0.99, indicating an excellent fit to the experimental data and the reliability of the proposed models.
The ANOVA results, as depicted in the Pareto chart in Figure 6A,B, further emphasized the significant effects of temperature (T) and pressure (P) on the extraction yield (Y), with p-values below 0.05. Among these variables, pressure was identified as having a substantial impact on the extraction yields of both burrito leaves and sucupira-preta seeds, reinforcing its critical role in optimizing the process.

3.2. Extract Components

3.2.1. Burrito Seeds

The chemical profile of the burrito leaf extract was analyzed under the experimental conditions that yielded the highest extraction efficiency (T = 60 °C and P = 28 MPa), as detailed in Table 5. The results revealed diverse compositions of bioactive compounds, including squalene (9.23%), nonacosane (17.98%), vitamin E (9.39%), hexadecanoic acid (9.51%), hexadecanal (8.58%), β-sitosterol acetate (8.27%), oleic acid (4.62%), and β-carotene (2.65%). Additionally, minor compounds, such as alkanes (e.g., tetracosane, pentacosane, hexacosane, heptacosane, and octacosane), and unidentified components accounted for a significant portion of the extract, reflecting the chemical complexity of the burrito leaves.
Among the identified compounds, nonacosane had the highest concentration (17.98%). Its elevated concentration in burrito leaves may be attributed to the adaptation of plants to environmental stressors, such as high temperatures or arid conditions, which necessitates enhanced protective mechanisms. Beyond its ecological role, nonacosane has been associated with potential pharmacological benefits, including antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective properties. These characteristics suggest that the high nonacosane content in burrito leaves could contribute to their therapeutic potential, particularly in formulations that target skin protection or inflammation-related conditions [37].
Other major compounds also exhibit significant pharmacological properties. Squalene, a sterol precursor, is known for its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory activities. It has been widely used as a vaccine adjuvant and has demonstrated antitumor potential by inducing apoptosis in cancer cells [38,39]. Vitamin E and β-carotene are potent antioxidants that protect cells from oxidative damage, support immune function, and contribute to skin and eye health. These compounds are also associated with the prevention of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular and neurodegenerative disorders [38,40].
Fatty acids such as hexadecanoic acid (palmitic acid) and oleic acid play essential roles in maintaining cellular membrane stability and promoting cardiovascular health. Oleic acid is recognized for its ability to reduce LDL cholesterol levels, thereby improving circulatory health [41]. Hexadecanal, an aldehyde, exhibits antimicrobial properties and may act as a plant defense compound [42]. β-sitosterol acetate, an ester, is widely acknowledged for its anti-inflammatory effects, cholesterol-lowering properties, and anticancer potential [43]. Additionally, farnesyl acetone, a ketone, may contribute to plant defense mechanisms against environmental stressors [44].
The presence of minor compounds and unidentified constituents further highlights the chemical diversity of the burrito leaves. This complexity reflects the adaptive capacity of plants to produce a wide range of bioactive molecules, some of which may have unexplored pharmacological or ecological roles. The detection of uncharacterized compounds underscores the need for further research to uncover their potential applications.
In summary, the chemical composition of burrito leaves, including major, minor, and unidentified compounds, demonstrated the potential of the plant as a source of bioactive molecules. The high concentration of nonacosane along with other pharmacologically relevant compounds reinforces the importance of burrito leaves in biotechnological and medicinal research. Furthermore, several of these constituents, such as β-sitosterol acetate, vitamin E, and squalene, have been associated with anxiolytic properties, suggesting that burrito leaves hold promise for the development of natural therapies targeting anxiety and related disorders.

3.2.2. Sucupira-Preta Seeds

The chemical composition of sucupira-preta seed oil was analyzed under the experimental conditions that produced the highest yield (T = 60 °C and P = 28 MPa). The results revealed a composition consisting predominantly of linoleic acid (28.05%), oleic acid (26.94%), and palmitic acid (24.83%), along with a significant concentration of squalene (20.18%) (Table 6).
Fatty acids identified in sucupira-preta seeds are essential for human health and nutrition. Linoleic acid, an omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid, plays a critical role in maintaining healthy skin, regulating inflammatory responses, and preserving the structural integrity of the cellular membranes [45]. Oleic acid, an omega-9 monounsaturated fatty acid, is known for its cardiovascular benefits [46]. Palmitic acid, a saturated fatty acid, is a natural constituent of many oils and fats and is indispensable for cellular membrane stability [47].
The presence of 20.18% squalene further enhanced the pharmacological value of sucupira-preta seed oil. Squalene is a bioactive compound with diverse biological properties including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory effects. It is extensively used in the pharmaceutical industry as a vaccine adjuvant and has shown potential for preventing cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases. In addition, squalene exhibits antitumor activity by inducing apoptosis in cancer cells, making it a compound of significant importance for human health [38,39,48].
The chemical profile of the sucupira-preta seeds highlights their nutritional and therapeutic potential. The high concentrations of linoleic, oleic, and palmitic acids underscore their value as sources of essential fatty acids, while the substantial presence of squalene reflects their pharmacological richness. Furthermore, squalene and oleic acid have been associated with anxiolytic effects, suggesting that sucupira-preta seed oil may have applications in the development of natural treatments for anxiety- and stress-related disorders [49].
Both burrito leaves and sucupira-preta seeds contain bioactive compounds with anxiolytic properties. In burrito leaves, β-sitosterol acetate, squalene, and vitamin E have been linked to the modulation of stress responses and reduction in anxiety-like behaviors in preclinical studies. Similarly, in sucupira-preta seeds, high concentrations of squalene and oleic acid are noteworthy, as these compounds have demonstrated anxiolytic effects through their ability to regulate oxidative stress and inflammation, which are often associated with anxiety disorders. The presence of these compounds in both plant matrices suggested that they may serve as valuable natural sources for the development of anxiolytic therapies.
Burrito leaves and sucupira-preta seeds contain bioactive compounds with therapeutic properties, such as antioxidants and anxiolytics, making them promising candidates for the development of pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and supplements. Future research should focus on validating their effects, identifying unknown compounds, and optimizing extraction processes, thereby expanding their application in natural and sustainable products.

4. Conclusions

This study demonstrated that supercritical CO2 extraction is a highly efficient technique for obtaining high-purity plant extracts, even when the yields are relatively modest. Burrito leaves achieved a maximum yield of 1.2%, while sucupira-preta seeds reached 4.2%, confirming the higher concentration of essential oils in the seeds. Despite the limited yields, the extracts displayed a complex chemical composition, including bioactive compounds such as fatty acids (oleic, linoleic, and palmitic acids), squalene, β-carotene, and vitamin E, all of which are recognized for their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anxiolytic properties.
Statistical analysis revealed that pressure was the most critical factor influencing the yield, whereas temperature had a comparatively smaller effect. The Sovová kinetic model exhibited a strong fit to the extraction curves, thus validating the robustness of the methodology. These findings emphasize the pharmaceutical potential of the extracts, particularly for the development of therapeutic and anxiolytic products, and reinforce the significance of supercritical extraction as a sustainable and effective method for isolating bioactive compounds.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.F.-P. and L.C.-F.; methodology, G.V.V., M.R.d.R.S., C.T.H., J.E.G., C.M.F.M. and O.A.S.; software, E.A.d.S. (Edson Antônio da Silva) and E.A.d.S. (Erivaldo Antônio da Silva); formal analysis, L.F-P., E.A.d.S. (Erivaldo Antônio da Silva), L.M.S.e.S. and R.J.d.S.; data curation, L.F.-P.; writing—original draft preparation, G.V.V. and L.F.-P.; writing—review and editing, L.F.-P.; visualization, L.F.-P. and M.J.d.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financed by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Grant Number 2018/23063-1).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article, and further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Coordination for the Improvement of the Staff of Higher Education (CAPES/PNPD Process number: 88887.357888/2019-00). LF-P thanks the financial support of the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, FAPESP (Brazil), through the grant 2018/23063-1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Clement, Y.; Chapouthier, G. Biological Bases of Anxiety. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 1998, 22, 623–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mitte, K.; Noack, P.; Steil, R.; Hautzinger, M. A Meta-Analytic Review of the Efficacy of Drug Treatment in Generalized Anxiety Disorder. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2005, 25, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zarrindast, M.-R.; Babapoor-Farrokhran, S.; Babapoor-Farrokhran, S.; Rezayof, A. Involvement of Opioidergic System of the Ventral Hippocampus, the Nucleus Accumbens or the Central Amygdala in Anxiety-Related Behavior. Life Sci. 2008, 82, 1175–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Carlini, E.A. Plants and the Central Nervous System. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2003, 75, 501–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Faustino, T.T.; de Almeida, R.B.; Andreatini, R. Medicinal Plants for the Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Review of Controlled Clinical Studies. Braz. J. Psychiatry 2010, 32, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Adorjan, B.; Buchbauer, G. Biological Properties of Essential Oils: An Updated Review. Flavour Fragr. J. 2010, 25, 407–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Edris, A.E. Pharmaceutical and Therapeutic Potentials of Essential Oils and Their Individual Volatile Constituents: A Review. Phytother. Res. 2007, 21, 308–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lang, G.; Buchbauer, G. A Review on Recent Research Results (2008–2010) on Essential Oils as Antimicrobials and Antifungals. A Review. Flavour Fragr. J. 2012, 27, 13–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pisseri, F.; Bertoli, A.; Pistelli, L. Essential Oils in Medicine: Principles of Therapy. Parassitologia 2008, 50, 89–91. [Google Scholar]
  10. Furtado, F.B. Caracterização Química e Atividades Biológicas Dos Óleos Essenciais de Protium Heptaphyllum, Hedyosmum Brasiliense, Blepharocalyx Salicifolius, Baccharis Dracunculifolia e Nectandra Megapotamica; Universidade Estadual Paulista: São Paulo, Brazil, 2018; p. 101. [Google Scholar]
  11. Vieira, L.F.d.A.; Reis, M.D. dos S.; Brandão, A.R.A.; Viana, I.M.M.N.; da Silva, J.P.; Barreto, E.; Smaniotto, S. Anxiolytic-like Effect of the Extract from Bowdichia virgilioides in Mice. Braz. J. Pharmacogn. 2013, 23, 680–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Albuquerque, K.S.; Guimarães, R.M.; de Almeida, Í.F.; Clemente, A.d.C.S. Métodos Para a Superação Da Dormência Em Sementes de Sucupira-Preta (Bowdichia virgilioides Kunth.). Ciência E Agrotecnologia 2007, 31, 1716–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Deharo, E.; Bourdy, G.; Quenevo, C.; Muñoz, V.; Ruiz, G.; Sauvain, M. A Search for Natural Bioactive Compounds in Bolivia through a Multidisciplinary Approach. Part V. Evaluation of the Antimalarial Activity of Plants Used by the Tacana Indians. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2001, 77, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Thomazzi, S.M.; Silva, C.B.; Silveira, D.C.R.; Vasconcellos, C.L.C.; Lira, A.F.; Cambui, E.V.F.; Estevam, C.S.; Antoniolli, A.R. Antinociceptive and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Bowdichia virgilioides (Sucupira). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 127, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Arriaga, Â.M.C.; Machado, M.I.L.; Gomes, G.A.; Craveiro, A.A. Volatile Constituents from Roots of Bowdichia virgilioides Kunt. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1998, 10, 205–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Torrenegra, R.; Bauereiß, P.; Achenbach, H. Homoormosanine-Type Alkaloids from Bowdichia virgiloides. Phytochemistry 1989, 28, 2219–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Velozo, L.S.M.; Da Silva, B.P.; Da Silva, E.M.B.; Parente, J.P. Constituents from the Roots of Bowdichia virgilioides. Fitoterapia 1999, 70, 532–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Melo, F.N.; Navarro, V.R.; Da Silva, M.S.; Da-cunha, E.V.L.; Barbosa-Filho, J.M.; Braz-filho, R. Bowdenol, a New 2,3-Dihydrobenzofuran Constituent from Bowdichia virgilioides. Nat. Prod. Lett. 2001, 15, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mora, S.; Díaz-Véliz, G.; Millán, R.; Lungenstrass, H.; Quirós, S.; Coto-Morales, T.; Hellión-Ibarrola, M.C. Anxiolytic and Antidepressant-like Effects of the Hydroalcoholic Extract from Aloysia polystachya in Rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2005, 82, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Filipov, A. Medicinal Plants of the Pilagá of Central Chaco. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1994, 44, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hellión-Ibarrola, M.C.; Ibarrola, D.A.; Montalbetti, Y.; Kennedy, M.L.; Heinichen, O.; Campuzano, M.; Ferro, E.A.; Alvarenga, N.; Tortoriello, J.; De Lima, T.C.M.; et al. The Antidepressant-like Effects of Aloysia polystachya (Griseb.) Moldenke (Verbenaceae) in Mice. Phytomedicine 2008, 15, 478–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kitzberger, C.S.G.; Smânia, A.; Pedrosa, R.C.; Ferreira, S.R.S. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Shiitake (Lentinula edodes) Extracts Obtained by Organic Solvents and Supercritical Fluids. J. Food Eng. 2007, 80, 631–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. de Melo, M.M.R.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Silva, C.M. Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Vegetable Matrices: Applications, Trends and Future Perspectives of a Convincing Green Technology. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2014, 92, 115–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sihvonen, M. Advances in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Technologies. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1999, 10, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lima, J.C.; de Araújo, P.C.C.; dos Santos Croscato, G.; de Almeida, O.; Cabral, V.F.; Ferreira-Pinto, L.; Cardozo-Filho, L. Experimental Phase Equilibrium Data for Rotenone in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2019, 64, 2357–2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nurhaslina, C.R.; Andi Bacho, S.; Mustapa, A.N. Review on Drying Methods for Herbal Plants. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 63, S122–S139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Freschet, G.T.; Pagès, L.; Iversen, C.M.; Comas, L.H.; Rewald, B.; Roumet, C.; Klimešová, J.; Zadworny, M.; Poorter, H.; Postma, J.A.; et al. A Starting Guide to Root Ecology: Strengthening Ecological Concepts and Standardising Root Classification, Sampling, Processing and Trait Measurements. New Phytol. 2021, 232, 973–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Silva, M.O.; Camacho, F.P.; Ferreira-Pinto, L.; Giufrida, W.M.; Vieira, A.M.S.; Visentaine, J.V.; Vedoy, D.R.L.; Cardozo-Filho, L. Extraction and Phase Behaviour of Moringa Oleifera Seed Oil Using Compressed Propane. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2016, 94, 2195–2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Corrêa, G.; Souza, M.R.d.R.; Nascimento, E.S.; Rodrigues Bjerk, T.; Goncalves, J.E.; Moritz, C.M.F.; Sakai, O.A.; da Silva, E.A.; dos Santos, R.J.; da Silva, E.A.; et al. Supercritical CO2 Extraction of Natural Compounds from Capuchin (Tropaeolum majus) Leaves and Seeds. Processes 2024, 12, 1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Weiß, C.H. StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, O.K.: STATISTICA, Version 8. AStA Adv. Stat. Anal. 2007, 91, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Anderson, M.J.; Whitcomb, P.J. Design of Experiments. In Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sovová, H. Rate of the Vegetable Oil Extraction with Supercritical CO2—I. Modelling of Extraction Curves. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1994, 49, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mateus, L.S.; Dutra, J.M.; Favareto, R.; da Silva, E.A.; Ferreira Pinto, L.; da Silva, C.; Cardozo-Filho, L. Optimization Studies and Compositional Oil Analysis of Pequi (Caryocar brasiliense Cambess) Almonds by Supercritical CO2 Extraction. Molecules 2023, 28, 1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wenceslau, B.R.; Santos, K.A.; da Silva, E.A.; Cardozo-Filho, L.; da Silva, C.; Favareto, R. Guariroba (Syagrus oleracea) Kernel Oil Extraction Using Supercritical CO2 and Compressed Propane and Its Characterization. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2021, 177, 105326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pederssetti, M.M.; Palú, F.; da Silva, E.A.; Rohling, J.H.; Cardozo-Filho, L.; Dariva, C. Extraction of Canola Seed (Brassica napus) Oil Using Compressed Propane and Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. J. Food Eng. 2011, 102, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Klein, E.J.; Johann, G.; da Silva, E.A.; Vieira, M.G.A. Mathematical Modeling of Supercritical CO 2 Extraction of Eugenia pyriformis Cambess. Leaves. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2021, 208, 1543–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Oliveira, T.L.S.; de Morais, S.R.; Sá, S.d.; Oliveira, M.G.d.; Florentino, I.F.; Silva, D.M.d.; Carvalho, V.V.; Silva, V.B.d.; Vaz, B.G.; Sabino, J.R.; et al. Antinociceptive, Anti-Inflammatory and Anxiolytic-like Effects of the Ethanolic Extract, Fractions and Hibalactone Isolated from Hydrocotyle umbellata L. (Acariçoba)—Araliaceae. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 95, 837–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sipeniece, E.; Mišina, I.; Qian, Y.; Grygier, A.; Sobieszczańska, N.; Sahu, P.K.; Rudzińska, M.; Patel, K.S.; Górnaś, P. Fatty Acid Profile and Squalene, Tocopherol, Carotenoid, Sterol Content of Seven Selected Consumed Legumes. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2021, 76, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, S.; Hu, H.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, J.; Liu, L.; Zhao, S.; Xie, J.; Li, C.; Shen, M. Simultaneous Determination of Tocopherols, Phytosterols, and Squalene in Vegetable Oils by High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Food Anal. Methods 2021, 14, 1567–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Miranda-Vilela, A.L.; Akimoto, A.K.; Alves, P.C.Z.; Pereira, L.C.S.; Klautau-Guimarães, M.N.; Grisolia, C.K. Dietary Carotenoid-Rich Oil Supplementation Improves Exercise-Induced Anisocytosis in Runners: Influences of Haptoglobin, MnSOD (Val9Ala), CAT (21A/T) and GPX1 (Pro198Leu) Gene Polymorphisms in Dilutional Pseudoanemia (“sports Anemia”). Genet. Mol. Biol. 2010, 33, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. French, M.A.; Sundram, K.; Clandinin, M.T. Cholesterolaemic Effect of Palmitic Acid in Relation to Other Dietary Fatty Acids. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2002, 11, S401–S407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bendiabdellah, A.; Dib, M.E.A.; Meliani, N.; Muselli, A.; Nassim, D.; Tabti, B.; Costa, J. Antibacterial Activity of Daucus Crinitus Essential Oils along the Vegetative Life of the Plant. J. Chem. 2013, 2013, 149502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Babu, S.; Jayaraman, S. An Update on β-Sitosterol: A Potential Herbal Nutraceutical for Diabetic Management. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 131, 110702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yusoff, N.; Abd Ghani, I.; Othman, N.W.; Aizat, W.M.; Hassan, M. Toxicity and Sublethal Effect of Farnesyl Acetate on Diamondback Moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Insects 2021, 12, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Azemi, N.A.; Azemi, A.K.; Abu-Bakar, L.; Sevakumaran, V.; Muhammad, T.S.T.; Ismail, N. Effect of Linoleic Acid on Cholesterol Levels in a High-Fat Diet-Induced Hypercholesterolemia Rat Model. Metabolites 2022, 13, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gnoni, G.V.; Natali, F.; Geelen, M.J.H.; Siculella, L. Oleic Acid as an Inhibitor of Fatty Acid and Cholesterol Synthesis. In Olives and Olive Oil in Health and Disease Prevention; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 1365–1373. [Google Scholar]
  47. Bergen, J.; Karasova, M.; Bileck, A.; Pignitter, M.; Marko, D.; Gerner, C.; Del Favero, G. Exposure to Dietary Fatty Acids Oleic and Palmitic Acid Alters Structure and Mechanotransduction of Intestinal Cells in Vitro. Arch. Toxicol. 2023, 97, 1659–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Li, Q.; Chen, G.-Q.; Fan, K.-W.; Lu, F.-P.; Aki, T.; Jiang, Y. Screening and Characterization of Squalene-Producing Thraustochytrids from Hong Kong Mangroves. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 4267–4272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Sasaki, K.; Ben Othman, M.; Ferdousi, F.; Yoshida, M.; Watanabe, M.; Tominaga, K.; Isoda, H. Modulation of the Neurotransmitter Systems through the Anti-Inflammatory and Antidepressant-like Effects of Squalene from Aurantiochytrium sp. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0218923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A schematic of the experimental supercritical extraction unit: 1—CO2 cylinder; 2—syringe pump; 3—thermostatic bath; 4—pressure indicator; 5—temperature controller/indicator; 6—extractor; 7—valve; 8—needle-type valve attached to an aluminum jacket for heating; 9—thermostatic bath; 10—aluminum structure.
Figure 1. A schematic of the experimental supercritical extraction unit: 1—CO2 cylinder; 2—syringe pump; 3—thermostatic bath; 4—pressure indicator; 5—temperature controller/indicator; 6—extractor; 7—valve; 8—needle-type valve attached to an aluminum jacket for heating; 9—thermostatic bath; 10—aluminum structure.
Separations 12 00006 g001
Figure 2. Experimental kinetic extraction curves with supercritical CO2 fitted using the Sovová model (Separations 12 00006 i001) of burrito leaves: 40 °C (■, 22 MPa; ▲, 28 MPa); 50 °C (Separations 12 00006 i002, 25 MPa); 60 °C (●, 22 MPa; ▼, 28 MPa) with a constant flow rate of 2.0 mL min−1.
Figure 2. Experimental kinetic extraction curves with supercritical CO2 fitted using the Sovová model (Separations 12 00006 i001) of burrito leaves: 40 °C (■, 22 MPa; ▲, 28 MPa); 50 °C (Separations 12 00006 i002, 25 MPa); 60 °C (●, 22 MPa; ▼, 28 MPa) with a constant flow rate of 2.0 mL min−1.
Separations 12 00006 g002
Figure 3. Experimental kinetic extraction curves with supercritical CO2 fitted using Sovová model (Separations 12 00006 i001) of sucupira-preta seeds: 40 °C (■, 22 MPa; ▲, 28 MPa); 50 °C (Separations 12 00006 i002, 25 MPa); 60 °C (●, 22 MPa; ▼, 28 MPa) with a constant flow rate of 2.0 mL min−1.
Figure 3. Experimental kinetic extraction curves with supercritical CO2 fitted using Sovová model (Separations 12 00006 i001) of sucupira-preta seeds: 40 °C (■, 22 MPa; ▲, 28 MPa); 50 °C (Separations 12 00006 i002, 25 MPa); 60 °C (●, 22 MPa; ▼, 28 MPa) with a constant flow rate of 2.0 mL min−1.
Separations 12 00006 g003
Figure 4. A response surface plot illustrating the extraction yield of oil from burrito leaves as a function of temperature and pressure, with a constant flow rate of 2.0 mL min−1.
Figure 4. A response surface plot illustrating the extraction yield of oil from burrito leaves as a function of temperature and pressure, with a constant flow rate of 2.0 mL min−1.
Separations 12 00006 g004
Figure 5. A response surface plot showing the oil extraction yield from sucupira-preta seeds as influenced by temperature and pressure at a fixed flow rate of 2.0 mL min−1.
Figure 5. A response surface plot showing the oil extraction yield from sucupira-preta seeds as influenced by temperature and pressure at a fixed flow rate of 2.0 mL min−1.
Separations 12 00006 g005
Figure 6. Pareto chart: analysis of linear effects of variables. (A) Burrito leaves and (B) sucupira-preta seeds.
Figure 6. Pareto chart: analysis of linear effects of variables. (A) Burrito leaves and (B) sucupira-preta seeds.
Separations 12 00006 g006
Table 1. Two-level factorial design.
Table 1. Two-level factorial design.
FactorsSymbolsUnitsLevels
−10+1
TemperatureT°C405060
PressurePMPa222528
Table 2. Experimental conditions and extraction yield data for the recovery of metabolites from burrito leaves and sucupira-preta seeds using supercritical CO2 at a constant flow rate of 2.0 mL min−1.
Table 2. Experimental conditions and extraction yield data for the recovery of metabolites from burrito leaves and sucupira-preta seeds using supercritical CO2 at a constant flow rate of 2.0 mL min−1.
RunTemperature (K)Pressure (MPa)Yield (wt%)
Burrito Leaves
140220.78
260220.85
340281.11
460281.20
550250.87
650250.91
750250.87
Sucupira-preta Seeds
140223.91
260223.97
340284.11
460284.23
550253.99
650253.96
750253.92
Table 3. Experimental conditions, extraction yield outcomes, and mathematical model adjustment parameters for supercritical CO2 extraction.
Table 3. Experimental conditions, extraction yield outcomes, and mathematical model adjustment parameters for supercritical CO2 extraction.
RunZWrS
(goil.gsolvent−1)
tCERtFERKFaKSaADDR2
(min)(min)(min−1)(min−1)(%)
Burrito Leaves
187.590.230.300.00280.055.059.360.0140.570.987
213.570.120.250.00250.507.641.450.0070.610.995
336.790.120.350.00320.135.543.930.0080.700.994
482.330.290.370.00410.055.218.800.0170.120.999
5–7 *1.030.120.320.00443.226.680.110.0080.510.996
Sucupira-Preta Seeds
143.580.0970.5100.0020.5135.474.660.0061.670.999
282.460.1420.8980.0020.08229.438.820.0081.680.999
36.280.0730.2150.0042.63920.320.670.0051.120.995
46.000.1170.3780.0032.94124.540.640.0073.390.994
5–7 *10.270.0970.4860.0031.75425.691.090.0063.300.997
Note: Extraction was carried out in triplicate *.
Table 4. Variance analysis results for the extracts obtained using a 22 factorial design for the extraction of plant matrices with carbon dioxide.
Table 4. Variance analysis results for the extracts obtained using a 22 factorial design for the extraction of plant matrices with carbon dioxide.
TermsSum of SquaresDegrees of FreedomMean SquaresF-Valuep-ValueR2
Burrito Leaves
Model0.122130.0407316.560.00030.997
T0.006410.006449.780.0059
P0.115610.1156899.110.0001
T.P 0.000110.00010.77780.4428
Pure Error0.000020.0000
Cor Total0.12256
Sucupira-Preta Seeds
Model0.086730.0289224.780.00050.996
T0.002510.002519.440.0216
P0.084110.0841654.110.0001
T.P 0.000110.00010.77780.4428
Pure Error0.000020.0000
Cor Total0.08716
T = temperature; P = pressure.
Table 5. Chemical profile of oil extracted from burrito leaves.
Table 5. Chemical profile of oil extracted from burrito leaves.
CompoundChemical ClassPeak Area (%) *
NonacosaneAlkane17.98
Hexadecanoic acidFatty acid9.51
Vitamin E Alcohol9.39
Squalene Alkane9.23
HexadecanalAldehyde8.58
β-sitosterol acetateEster8.27
Unknown-3.53
Farnesyl acetone <(5E,9Z)->Cetone2.06
Unknown-1.12
PentacosaneAlkane0.42
HexacosaneAlkane0.40
TetracosaneAlkane0.33
unknown-11.88
UntriacontaneAlkane1.81
UnknownAldehyde5.80
β-CaroteneCarotenoid2.65
Oleic acidFatty acid4.62
OctacosaneAlkane0.65
HeptacosaneAlkane0.81
Farnesyl acetone <(Z,Z)->Cetone0.96
Mean ± standard deviation (n = 3) *.
Table 6. Chemical profile of oil extracted from sucupira-preta seeds.
Table 6. Chemical profile of oil extracted from sucupira-preta seeds.
CompoundChemical ClassPeak Area (%) *
Linoleic acidFatty acid28.05 ± 0.09
Oleic acidFatty acid26.94 ± 0.05
Palmitic acidFatty acid24.83 ± 0.01
SqualeneAlkene20.18 ± 0.13
Mean ± standard deviation (n = 3) *.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vieira, G.V.; Souza, M.R.d.R.; Hiranobe, C.T.; Goncalves, J.E.; Moritz, C.M.F.; Sakai, O.A.; e Silva, L.M.S.; da Silva, M.J.; da Silva, E.A.; dos Santos, R.J.; et al. Kinetics of Supercritical CO2 Extraction from Burrito (Aloysia polystachya) Leaves and Sucupira-Preta (Bowdichia virgilioides) Seeds. Separations 2025, 12, 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations12010006

AMA Style

Vieira GV, Souza MRdR, Hiranobe CT, Goncalves JE, Moritz CMF, Sakai OA, e Silva LMS, da Silva MJ, da Silva EA, dos Santos RJ, et al. Kinetics of Supercritical CO2 Extraction from Burrito (Aloysia polystachya) Leaves and Sucupira-Preta (Bowdichia virgilioides) Seeds. Separations. 2025; 12(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations12010006

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vieira, Gabrielle Vaz, Michel Rubens dos Reis Souza, Carlos Toshiyuki Hiranobe, José Eduardo Goncalves, Cristiane Mengue Feniman Moritz, Otávio Akira Sakai, Leila Maria Sotocorno e Silva, Michael Jones da Silva, Erivaldo Antônio da Silva, Renivaldo José dos Santos, and et al. 2025. "Kinetics of Supercritical CO2 Extraction from Burrito (Aloysia polystachya) Leaves and Sucupira-Preta (Bowdichia virgilioides) Seeds" Separations 12, no. 1: 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations12010006

APA Style

Vieira, G. V., Souza, M. R. d. R., Hiranobe, C. T., Goncalves, J. E., Moritz, C. M. F., Sakai, O. A., e Silva, L. M. S., da Silva, M. J., da Silva, E. A., dos Santos, R. J., da Silva, E. A., Cardozo-Filho, L., & Ferreira-Pinto, L. (2025). Kinetics of Supercritical CO2 Extraction from Burrito (Aloysia polystachya) Leaves and Sucupira-Preta (Bowdichia virgilioides) Seeds. Separations, 12(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations12010006

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop