1. Introduction
Diffraction is a fundamental phenomenon present in all classical waves [
1]. In 1987, Durnin et al. made a theoretical and experimental prediction that the Bessel beam could be a diffraction-free solution to the Helmholtz equation [
2]. This means that waves can propagate without diffraction in this case. Durnin et al. conducted detailed theoretical analyses, numerical simulations, and experimental demonstrations of these non-diffusive waves [
2,
3]. This discovery prompted researchers to explore other non-diffusive wave profiles consistent with the Helmholtz equation. Berry and Balazs predicted non-dispersive Airy wave packets with curved propagation profiles for the first time in the context of quantum mechanics [
4], demonstrating that the Schrodinger equation could have solutions in the form of Airy functions. Although the ideal Airy wave packet associated with infinite energy has not been achieved in recent decades, Sivilglou et al. introduced solutions of Airy functions in the field of optics and combined Schrödinger’s equation with the even-axis Helmholtz equation in 2007 [
4,
5]. Airy waves have unique properties and applications, such as non-diffraction [
5], self-healing [
6], and self-accelerating [
7], and can be used in optical micromanipulation [
7,
8,
9], microscopy [
10,
11,
12], and forming optical bullets [
13,
14].
Traditionally, the generation of Airy beams has relied on the use of phase masks created by diffractive optical elements, spatial light modulators and additional Fourier transform lenses [
15,
16,
17]. However, these methods are often bulky and incompatible with the integration of non-monotonic systems, limiting their use in small or integrated optical devices. Moreover, these methods typically have a pixel size larger than the working wavelength, which constrains their performance and accuracy.
As a new class of meta-materials, metasurfaces consisting of single-layer planar structures show great potential for generating almost arbitrary electromagnetic wavefronts with low energy losses through engineered and structurally relevant phase shifts [
18]. Metasurfaces are two-dimensional or quasi-two-dimensional forms of metamaterials, composed of unitary structures arranged in a two-dimensional plane in a specific manner to selectively control the electromagnetic response [
19]. However, metasurfaces face challenges in alleviating the drawbacks of large-scale metamaterials, such as volume loss, manufacturing requirements, and compatibility with on-chip photonic devices. The discontinuous and abrupt phase changes on the structured surface are used to manipulate the wavefront of transmitted or reflected waves, thus modulating the phase, amplitude, and polarization state of electromagnetic waves for purposes such as focusing, beam deflection, and special beam generation [
20]. Recent studies have demonstrated various practical applications of metasurfaces, including beam shapers [
21,
22], focusing lenses [
23,
24], multifunctional devices [
25,
26], and invisibility cloaks [
26,
27]. Metasurfaces have more significant electromagnetic properties compared with conventional optical elements, Due to being ultra-thin, they overcome the disadvantages of difficult integration into conventional optical systems and limited functionality. Based on the concept of metasurfaces, a phase modulation method for generating an Airy beam was proposed by Minovich et al. [
7].
However, due to the complexity of the Airy function and structure, an amplitude modulation is virtually impossible to consider simultaneously, which compromises the profile of the Airy beam [
28]. In recent years, via the generalized Snell’s law, metasurfaces can introduce discontinuous abrupt phases and form specific gradients to achieve anomalous refraction and reflection [
18]. This provides a new tool to generate Airy beams with phase and amplitude modulation using metasurfaces by absorbing, reflecting, or polarizing the unwanted amplitude components converted by the metasurfaces, while obtaining the desired phase response with a geometric rotation or scaling operation. Free-space Airy beams have been successfully generated by implementing metasurfaces such as orthogonal gold nanorods [
29] and C-aperture arrays [
30]. Nevertheless, these techniques have restricted bandwidth and high efficiency.
We propose a method to generate a broadband Airy beam in the microwave section with a reflective geometry structure as shown in
Figure 1. The unit cell structure is a polarization conversion cell with a strict diagonal symmetry.
We have shown that this unit cell can theoretically have an arbitrary controllable amplitude and binary phase response. After normalizing the amplitude, the amplitude and the phase are independent of the broadband frequency. Then, the amplitude is only associated with the angular rotation of the element. The incident linearly polarized (LP) wave is transformed at the metasurfaces’ aperture into a cross-polarized component of an amplitude-phase modulated profile yielding the desired Airy beam [
31]. This unit cell facilitates the implementation of an Airy beam over a wide spectral range. The incoming LP waves are transformed into their cross-polarized components with amplitude-phase-modulated profiles on the metasurfaces’ aperture, resulting in the desired Airy beam.The diffraction-free, self-bending, and self-healing performance of the Airy beam are all simulated and demonstrated to verify the broadband characteristic of the proposed metasurfaces’ design by comparing these three properties at different frequencies. Furthermore, we also compare differences between the Airy beams generated by the metasurfaces with and without amplitude modulation, which further indicates the advantages of our design.
2. Materials and Methods
To improve the efficiency of metasurfaces, there has been a growing interest in reflective metasurfaces due to their high efficiency. The design of a unit cell with arbitrary controllable amplitude and free combinations of binary heterodyne responses is crucial for generating Airy beams [
32]. To achieve phase and amplitude modulation, we propose the use of dumbbell-type structures with different rotation angles θ as our basic units, as illustrated in
Figure 2a.
We used CST Microwave Studio 2016 frequency domain solver to simulate and optimize the metasurfaces’ cell structure. Copper with a conductivity of σ = 5.8 × 107 S/m was used as the metal, and Rogers 4350 B with a dielectric constant of 3.5 and a loss tangent of 0.0027 was used as the dielectric layer. The low-loss tangent of the dielectric substrate ensured high reflectivity over a wide frequency range, while the minimal metal loss in the microwave region further reduced energy absorption. Our design goal was to maximize the polarization conversion efficiency. After several simulations and continuous adjustment of the structural parameters, we determined the optimal structure parameters to be P = 6 mm, h = 1.524 mm, t = 35 μm, r = 1.5 mm, l = 2.5 mm, b = 0.4 mm.
The dumbbell-shaped unit cell demonstrates outstanding cross-polarization transmission performance, with a normalized transmission coefficient amplitude that can be adjusted between 0 and 1, while maintaining a binary phase of 0–π. This is illustrated in
Figure 2c,d, indicating that the unit cell is well-suited for producing Airy beams. It can be seen that the maximum transmission coefficient can reach approximately 0.9. As shown in
Figure 2c when q = ±45°, the transmission coefficient is close to zero when θ is 0°or 180°. Furthermore, the phase response exhibits an essentially unchanged binary phase difference when the dumbbell structure is rotated to positive and negative angles. The amplitude response can synthesize the initial desired Airy profile amplitude, and the phase response matches the desired binary phase, as illustrated in
Figure 2c,d. The amplitude and phase response of the dumbbell-shaped cell can be well-controlled over a wide bandwidth, making it possible to generate broadband Airy beams.
When designing an array structure for generating an Airy beam, two critical factors must be taken into account. Firstly, the ideal Airy beam demands a suitable number of cell structures in a specific direction. Secondly, the bending of the beam is influenced by the number of unitary structures [
29].
The amplitude and phase responses obtained from
Figure 2c,d were utilized to create the dumbbell rotation angles at various positions of the incident plane wavefront when generating the initial Airy beam profile. Due to the compact size of the cell (6 mm) designed in this study, 40 cells can be placed on the one-dimensional Airy beam generating metasurfaces, as illustrated in
Figure 3c.
According to the principle outlined in [
4], the Airy beam wave packet of finite energy can be described as:
In the equation,
Ai represents the Airy function, where
s =
x/
x0 is the dimensionless transverse coordinate,
ξ =
z/
kx02 is the normalized propagation distance,
w denotes the scale length,
k is the free-space wave vector,
a is the Airy truncation factor, and the attenuation parameter
a must be a small positive number, significantly less than 1, to ensure that the desired Airy beam effect can be achieved. The amplitude and phase distributions along the variable surface profile (
z = 0) can be obtained immediately from the diffraction-free properties of the Airy beam. According to the diffraction-free property of the Airy beam, the amplitude and phase distributions along the variable surface profile (
z = 0) can be used as the initial field envelope of the one-dimensional Airy beam, as shown below:
and the amplitude and phase distribution must satisfy
According to the Equation (1), it can be inferred that the Airy function’s magnitude is a slowly decaying oscillating function, and the envelope of the Airy beam amplitude can be represented as a series of peak intensity distributions. The required phase should consist of two alternating sections with values of 0 and π.
The reflective cell structure proposed in the previous section satisfies this requirement, as illustrated in
Figure 3a,b, enabling us to evolve the encoding of the Airy beam profile through sampling. To realize the metasurfaces’ Airy beam generator, we need to disperse the amplitude and phase distribution over the metasurfaces’ aperture, taking into account the lattice constant
p = 6 mm. We designed separate samples using 1D Airy functions, with fixed parameters of
a = 0.04 and
x0 = 0.02 in Equation (1). As the metasurfaces feature 1D amplitude and phase distribution along the x-direction, they remain identical for the meta-atoms along the y-column. To achieve this, we designed an amplitude and phase distribution along the x-direction, as shown in
Figure 3c.
To ease the determination of the rotation angle of the dumbbell, we normalize the transmission amplitude such that it has the same maximum value as the envelope of the Airy beam amplitude. By dividing the Airy function amplitude and phase distribution into 40 equal segments, a dumbbell-type structure with different rotation angles can describe the exponential decay characteristics. Each section of the Airy function’s transmission amplitude corresponds to a distinct rotation angle of the dumbbell-type structure, with the distribution of 40 dumbbells with different rotation angles shown in
Figure 3c. As a result, we can achieve exponential decay characteristics using dumbbell-type structures with different rotation angles.
4. Discussion
Based on our simulation results demonstration, we can synthesize two-dimensional (1D) microwave Airy beams with different main-lobe sizes, sidelobe levels, and quasi-nondiffracting propagation distances by adjusting key parameters such as x0 and decay factor a for a given operating frequency. This approach enables the construction of metasurfaces based on the relationship between the magnitude/phase response of the dumbbell-type structure unit and the 1D Airy beam packet. This provides a flexible and versatile method for generating desirable Airy beams with various characteristics. Additionally, the ability to synthesize Airy beams with different characteristics using a single metasurfaces’ design offers significant potential for applications in various fields, including microwave signal processing, sensing, and imaging.
The efficiency of our proposed method for generating Airy beams using metasur-faces is comparable to, and in some cases, higher than other methods for generating Airy beams. Transmission approaches for generating Airy beams often suffer from low efficiency due to the significant energy loss caused by diffraction and absorption in the optical elements used. Digital holography and spatial light modulators offer better efficiency, but they require complex and expensive setups. In contrast, our proposed method using metasurfaces offers high efficiency due to the ability to control the phase and amplitude of the reflected waves with high precision. Additionally, the use of metasurfaces allows for more straightforward fabrication and integration into existing microwave devices, which can further increase the overall efficiency of the system.
In addition to efficiency, the use of metasurfaces for generating Airy beams offers several other advantages. One advantage is the ability to achieve high-quality wave-front control, which can result in improved beam quality and reduced distortion. Metasurfaces can achieve this level of control by manipulating the local phase and amplitude of the reflected waves with subwavelength precision. Another advantage of using metasurfaces for generating Airy beams is their compatibility with a wide range of frequencies and waveforms. Metasurfaces can be designed to work with various types of electromagnetic waves, including microwaves, terahertz waves, and optical waves. This flexibility makes them suitable for a diverse range of applications.
Furthermore, metasurfaces are relatively easy to fabricate using standard lithography techniques, allowing for cost-effective and scalable production. This is in contrast to other methods for generating Airy beams, which often require specialized equipment and complex fabrication processes.
Overall, the use of metasurfaces for generating Airy beams offers several advantages over other existing methods, including high efficiency, precise wavefront control, compatibility with various frequencies and waveforms, and ease of fabrication. These advantages make metasurfaces a promising platform for the development of advanced electromagnetic devices in various fields.
5. Conclusions
In our proposed method for generating Airy beams, we designed and fabricated metasurfaces that could reflect and manipulate microwave radiation to create the desired Airy beam profile. The metasurfaces were composed of an array of subwavelength-sized metallic patches that were patterned on a dielectric substrate. By varying the shape and position of these patches, we were able to control the phase and amplitude of the reflected waves, which allowed us to create the Airy beam profile.
To demonstrate the performance of our method, we compared the numerically simulated results with the theoretical predictions. The simulation results showed excellent agreement with the simulations, verifying the effectiveness of our approach for generating high-efficiency and wideband Airy beams in microwave sections with reflective geometry.
The presented metasurfaces solve the challenge of simultaneously controlling amplitude and phase modulation. We demonstrated simplified metasurfaces that can generate an Airy beam with both phase and amplitude modulation, and we discussed the advantages of Airy beams with both modulation types in detail.
In conclusion, our proposed method offers a novel approach for generating Airy beams that could have important applications in areas such as microwave signal processing, imaging, and sensing. Furthermore, our approach using metasurfaces could be extended to other types of wavefront manipulation, offering a promising platform for the development of advanced electromagnetic devices.