Next Article in Journal
Cap Layer Effect on Key Features of Persistent Photoconductivity Spectra in HgTe/CdHgTe Double Quantum Well Heterostructures
Previous Article in Journal
X-ray 3D Imaging of Low-Density Laser-Target Materials
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

High-Power Acoustic-Optical Q-Switched 1.83 µm Tm-Doped Bulk Laser

1
State Key Laboratory of Pulsed Power Laser Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei 230037, China
2
Advanced Laser Technology Laboratory of Anhui Province, Hefei 230037, China
3
Nanhu Laser Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
4
School of Mechanics and Optoelectronic Physics, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China
5
Institute of Novel Semiconductors, State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Photonics 2023, 10(8), 876; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10080876
Submission received: 4 July 2023 / Revised: 24 July 2023 / Accepted: 25 July 2023 / Published: 28 July 2023

Abstract

:
We report on a high-power acoustic-optical (AO) Q-switched Tm:YLF laser operating at ~1.83 μm by controlling the transmittance of the output coupler. Under the continuous-wave (CW) operation, the maximum output power of 13 W is achieved, and the slope efficiency is up to 32.7%. With a YAG etalon inserted into the cavity, the linewidth is compressed below 0.5 nm with a maximum output power of 12.2 W. In the Q-switched state, the maximum pulsed output power of 10.32 W is achieved with a pulse duration of 150 ns when the repetition rate is 15 kHz. And the maximum pulsed energy of 1.13 mJ is generated with a duration of 131 ns at 5 kHz. As far as we know, this is the highest output power reported for the CW and pulsed 1.83 μm laser. In addition, the relationship between the output wavelength and crystal length is theoretically analyzed, which shows that increasing the loss of 1880 nm is the key to high-power 1.83 μm laser output.

1. Introduction

A laser at an eye-safe wavelength of ~1.8 µm has attracted much attention in the fields of polymer laser-welding, mid-infrared gas spectroscopy and nonlinear frequency conversion [1,2,3,4]. In particular, a 1.8 µm laser is the ideal source to pump Cr:ZnS/ZnSe crystals to generate a 2.5 µm mid-infrared laser [5]. However, in the eye-safe band of 1.4~2.1 µm, a high-power laser output around 1.7~1.8 µm remains a challenge, although Er3+ (1.5~1.6 µm), Tm3+ and Ho3+ (1.9~2.1 µm) ion-doped crystals have been developed and commercialized.
At present, radiation around 1.7~1.8 µm can be generated by using Nd3+ or Tm3+-doped laser crystals [6,7] or nonlinear crystals [8,9,10]. In 2021, P. Lei et al. reported a 1855.5 nm MgO:PPLN optical parametric oscillator, and the maximum average output power was only 1.57 W at a pulse repetition frequency (PRF) of 40 kHz [11]. However, the output power for the frequency conversion method is usually constrained by the damage threshold of nonlinear crystals. In contrast, rare earth ion-doped laser crystals are a direct and effective method for obtaining high-power laser output. For example, the Nd3+ ion has attracted special attention due to its ~1.83 µm emission for the energy transition from 4F3/2 to 4I15/2. In fact, the first Nd3+ laser operating at 1830 nm can be dated back to 1971 based on a Nd:YAG rod [12]. Recently, the output power of the 1.83 µm Nd:YAG laser has been improved to 3.28 W [13]. Unfortunately, the rollover phenomenon is inescapable due to the serious thermal effects caused by the quantum defect [14]. In addition to Nd3+-based laser materials, the Tm3+-doped gain materials have been tested for 1.8 µm laser generation. In fact, Tm3+-doped bulk crystals are broadly used to generate a 1.9~2 µm laser by the transitions from 3F4 to 3H6 with the advantages of broad emission spectrum and high Stokes efficiency [15,16,17]. As we all know, the gain spectrum is located at 1.9~2 µm for the free-running Tm3+-doped lasers due to the re-absorption effect [18]. A possible solution is to use a wavelength-tuning element to obtain the 1.8 µm emission of Tm3+. In 2008, a 1.835 µm Tm:YLF laser was realized with an output power below 1 W using a birefringent filter [19]. In 2019, a tunable Tm:CaYAlO4 laser was reported based on a YAG etalon, but the output power was under 2 W over the entire wavelength range between 1848 nm and 1876 nm [20]. In addition, it has been proven that controlling the transmittance of the output coupler (OC) can efficiently generate a 1.8 µm laser, but the output power scaling is still constrained below 10 W. For example, in 2019, Na et al. demonstrated a high-efficiency 1.83 µm Tm:YLF laser with a continuous-wave (CW) output power of 8.5 W by utilizing handpicked output couplers [21]. Later, Na et al. demonstrated a continuous-wave Tm:YAP laser, and the maximum output powers are 7.04 W and 7.1 W, corresponding to 1825 nm and 1844 nm, respectively [22]. Evidently, the potential of Tm3+-doped crystals to produce a high-power output at 1.8 µm needs to be further investigated. And there is no report on the powerful Q-switched Tm3+-doped bulk laser at ~1.8 µm with an output power exceeding 10 W.
In this study, we report an acoustic-optical (AO) Q-switched 1.83 µm Tm:YLF laser based on the approach of controlling transmittance of OC. The relationship between the output wavelength and the length of the Tm:YLF crystal is analyzed theoretically. A maximum output power of 13 W is generated in the CW operation, and the slope efficiency is up to 32.7%. In order to stabilize and compress the linewidth of 1830 nm, an undoped YAG etalon with a thickness of 125 µm is inserted into the cavity under the CW operation. The maximum output power of 12.2 W is demonstrated with a linewidth below 0.5 nm. When the AO Q-switch is turned on, the maximum pulsed output power is 10.32 W at 15 kHz with a pulse width of 150 ns. And the maximum pulse energy is 1.13 mJ at 5 kHz with a pulse width of 131 ns.

2. Experimental Setup

The experimental configuration of the LD-pumped 1.83 µm Tm:YLF laser is shown in Figure 1. A 50 W fiber-coupled diode laser emitting at 790 nm is utilized as the pump source. The core diameter is 105 µm, and the numerical aperture is 0.22. Based on a 1:4 coupling lens, the pump spot is expanded to 530 µm. A c-cut 3.0 at.% Tm3+-doped YLF crystal is used as the gain medium with dimensions of 3 mm × 3 mm × 10 mm. The ends of Tm:YLF have antireflection (AR) coatings at 793 nm and 1908 nm. The acoustic aperture of the AO Q-switch is 2 mm, and the physical length is 50 mm. The AO Q-switch is AR-coated at 2 µm. In order to dissipate the waste heat, a laser chiller is used with a cooling temperature of 20 ℃. The laser resonator is composed of a plane input mirror (M1) and a concave output mirror (M2). The physical length of the cavity is 85 mm. The optical transmission curves of the input (red solid line) and output (black solid line) mirrors are shown in Figure 2. M1 is high reflectivity (HR) coated at 1750–2200 nm (reflectivity > 99%) and antireflection (AR) coated at 792 nm (reflectivity < 2%). M2 has a transmission of 10% at 1830 nm and a transmission of more than 45% at 1880–2100 nm. In our experiment, three output mirrors with a radius of curvature (ROC) of 100 mm (OC1), 200 mm (OC2) and 500 mm (OC3) are used for comparison. In addition, a concave output mirror OC4 (ROC = 300 mm) coated at 1850–2150 nm with a 20% transmission is also used in the following spectrum research. The output power is measured by a laser power meter (PM150 Coherent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The temporal pulse profiles are recorded by a fast InGaAs photodetector (EOT, ET-5000F) with a rise time of 28 ps and monitored by a digital oscilloscope (InfiniiVision DSOX6002A, KEYSIGHT).

3. Results and Discussions

First, the spectral output characteristics of Tm:YLF crystal are studied based on OC1. We test five different lengths of Tm:YLF crystals, and find an interesting phenomenon that the output wavelength is related to the Tm:YLF crystal length. As shown in Table 1, when the crystal lengths are 10 mm, 12 mm and 15 mm, the Tm:YLF laser emits at ~1.83 µm. However, when the crystal lengths are 22 mm and 25 mm, the output wavelengths move to ~1.88 µm. As is well known, the laser radiation wavelength depends on the laser threshold. Therefore, it is necessary to keep the 1830 nm laser at a lower pump threshold power. The threshold pump power equation is given as [21]
P t h = π h ν p ( ω o 2 + ω p 2 ) ( 2 σ α N t l + L ln ( 1 T O C ) ) / 4 η p τ ( σ α + σ e )
where p is pump photon energy, ωo is the radius of laser in the crystal, ωp is the radius of pump laser in the crystal, ηp is the pumping efficiency, τ is the upper-level lifetime, σα and σe are absorption cross-section and emission cross-section at laser wavelength, Nt is the number of active particles, l is the crystal length, L is intrinsic double-pass cavity loss and TOC is the transmittance of the output coupler. The parameters for the calculation of Equation (1) are listed in Table 2. The relationship between the threshold pump power and the Tm:YLF crystal length for 1830 nm and 1880 nm is shown in Figure 3. And the experimental results agree well with the theoretical predictions. It can be seen that the intersection of the two curves corresponds to a crystal length of approximately 16 mm. For crystal lengths below 16 mm, the threshold pump power for 1830 nm radiation is lower. On the contrary, the 1880 nm laser would oscillate. This phenomenon is due to the reversal of the intracavity losses of these two wavelengths caused by reabsorption losses. Herein, the 10 mm long Tm:YLF crystal is used in the following study.
Second, the characteristics of the 1.83 µm Tm:YLF laser under CW operation are investigated, as shown in Figure 4. To optimize the output power, three output mirrors with different radii of curvature of 100 mm (OC1), 200 mm (OC2) and 500 mm (OC3) are used. When the ROC of the OC is 100 mm, a maximum CW output power of 13 W is obtained, and the slope efficiency is up to 32.7%. When the ROC increases, the maximum output powers decrease to 8.02 W (OC2) and 5.63 W (OC3), and the corresponding slope efficiencies decrease to 21.6% and 16.2%, respectively. The polarization of the output light measured by a linear polarizer is horizontal. Compared with our previous studies [24], it can be found that the laser output performance is not inferior to the 1.9 µm wavelength, although the 1.83 µm emission band is seriously affected by the reabsorption of the Tm:YLF crystal. Considering the difficulty in manufacturing the laser mirrors for the 1.83 µm Tm:YLF laser, the output power will be further improved if volume Bragg grating (VBG) is used to select wavelengths.
Here, we attribute the optimal ROC of 100 mm to the better mode matching when the thermal effect of the gain medium is considered. The thermal focal length for a diode end-pumped bulk laser can be written as [25]
f T = π K c ω p 2 / ( ξ P i n η a b s ( d n / d T ) ) / ( 1 exp ( α p l ) )
where Pin is the incident pump power, αp is the absorption coefficient of the pump laser, ωp is the pump waist, ξ is the fraction of pump power that results in heating, Kc is the heat conductivity, ηabs is the absorption efficiency, dn/dT is the temperature-dependent coefficient of the index of refraction and l is the length of the crystal. The relationship between the thermal focal length of the Tm:YLF crystal and the incident pump power is shown in Figure 5. When the input pump power is 45 W, the thermal focal length is approximately 80 mm. The laser mode radius in the resonant cavity is simulated using the ABCD matrix theory. The results show that, when the radii of the curvature are 500 mm, 200 mm and 100 mm, the spot diameters at the center of the crystal are theoretically calculated to be 0.72 mm, 0.66 mm and 0.46 mm, respectively. According to the empirical value, the optimal ratio of oscillating laser spot to pump spot at the crystal is about 0.8 [26]. Therefore, a good mode match between the oscillating laser and the pump laser is achieved when the ROC is 100 mm.
Subsequently, the characteristics of the AO Q-switched Tm:YLF laser are investigated with OC1. When the static AO Q-switch is placed behind the Tm:YLF crystal, the maximum CW output power declines from 13 W to 10.53 W, and the slope efficiency is reduced from 32.7% to 27.5%, as shown in Figure 6. Turn on the AO Q-switch, and the stable pulsed operation is achieved. When the PRFs are set to 5 kHz, 10 kHz and 15 kHz, the maximum average output powers of 5.65 W, 9.22 W and 10.32 W are obtained, corresponding to slope efficiencies of 23.6%, 24.2% and 26.9%, respectively. And the polarization of the pulsed laser remains a horizontal direction. In the inset of Figure 6, the peak-to-peak power fluctuation of 1.58% over 0.5 h at 5 kHz exhibits the high stability of the output power. Figure 7 shows the variation in the pulse duration, the pulse energy and the peak power with the incident pump powers. The pulse energy and the peak power increase with the incident pump power, but the pulse duration is inversely proportional to the input pump power. As shown in Figure 7a, the shortest pulse durations of 131 ns, 138 ns and 150 ns are realized for 5 kHz, 10 kHz and 15 kHz, respectively. In Figure 7b, the maximum single pulse energies of 0.68 mJ, 0.92 mJ and 1.13 mJ are obtained. To avoid damaging the crystal, the pulse energy is limited to about 1 mJ. And the maximum peak powers are 8.63 kW, 6.67 kW and 4.53 kW, as shown in Figure 7c. The temporal pulse train and the single pulse envelope at 5 kHz are shown in Figure 8.
Figure 9 shows the laser spectra of Tm:YLF lasers under different operation modes, which are measured by an APE laser spectrometer (the spectral resolution of 0.5 nm). Considering that the actual spectrum jumps within a certain wavelength range, we use the “Max. Hold” function of the spectrometer to collect and display the light intensities that occur in the measurement process. In the CW regime, the center wavelength is located at 1830 nm when the OC1 is used. However, the laser wavelength slightly blueshifts from 1830 nm to 1824 nm in the Q-switching regime due to increased intracavity loss [27,28,29]. The full width at half-maximum (FWHM) is measured to be approximately 6.5 nm for CW and pulsed states. In contrast, the Tm:YLF laser emits at 1906 nm with a FWHM of ~7 nm when the OC4 is employed as the output mirror. In order to stabilize and compress the linewidth of 1830 nm, an undoped YAG etalon with a thickness of 125 μm is inserted into the cavity under CW operation. The inset of Figure 9 shows the output spectrum when inserting the etalon. The linewidth cannot be measured accurately due to the limitation of spectrometer resolution, and the real linewidth is less than 0.5 nm. As shown in Figure 4 (Square data), the maximum output power decreases to 12.2 W. The slope efficiency of 32.2% changes very slightly, indicating that the etalon does not affect the laser performance. As shown in Figure 10, the output beam quality of the ~1.83 µm laser is measured based on the 90.0/10.0 scanning-knife-edge method. And the M2 factors are calculated to be 1.5 and 1.4 in the x and y directions, respectively.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, a high-power 1.83 µm Tm:YLF laser has been successfully realized with an output power exceeding 10 W for the first time, as far as we know. Under the incident pump power of 45 W, the maximum CW output power of 13 W is achieved, and the slope efficiency is up to 32.7%. When the PRF is 15 kHz, the maximum pulsed output power of 10.32 W is achieved, corresponding to a pulse duration of 150 ns. Under the PRF of 5 kHz, the maximum pulse energy of 1.13 mJ and the narrowest pulse width of 131 ns are realized with a peak power of 8.6 kW. The center emission wavelength of the CW Tm:YLF laser is located at 1.83 µm with a FWHM of 6.5 nm and is shifted to 1824 nm in the Q-switched regime. With a YAG etalon inserted into the cavity, the linewidth is compressed below 0.5 nm with the maximum output power of 12.2 W. In fact, a high-power laser output at 1.83 μm has always been ignored, because the traditional Tm3+-doped crystals emit at 1.88–2.05 μm (Tm:YLF: 1.88 μm and 1.908 μm, Tm:YAP: 1.94 μm and 1.99 μm, Tm:YAG: 2.05 μm). Our experiment results demonstrate that the 1.83 µm Tm:YLF crystal is capable of producing powerful laser output, and has the potential to be applied in fields such as material processing and nonlinear optics. In addition, a theory model is established to predict the relationship between output wavelength and crystal length, which point out an effective technical approach for the generation of a 1.83 μm high-power laser. Theoretical analysis results show that increasing the loss of 1880 nm is the key to the high-power 1.83 μm laser. However, considering the difficulty in manufacturing the laser mirrors for 1.83 µm Tm:YLF lasers, volume Bragg grating (VBG) will be used in the future due to its strong wavelength selection ability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.L. and L.G.; methodology, G.L. and H.X.; validation, G.L., L.G. and X.-A.D.; formal analysis, G.L. and J.B.; investigation, G.L., L.G. and J.B.; resources, L.G., J.B. and K.Y.; data curation, G.L. and H.K.; Software, Q.Y. and Y.Y.; Visualization, J.W.; writing—original draft preparation, G.L.; writing—review and editing, G.L. and L.G.; supervision and funding acquisition, J.B. and L.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 62105003, No. 62175130), Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (2108085QA29), Director Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Pulsed Power Laser Technology (No. SKL2021ZR08, No. SKL2022ZR03), the Technology Domain Fund of 173 Project (No. 2021-JCJQ-JJ-0284, No.2022-JCJQ-JJ-0237), Technology Domain Fund of Basic Strengthening Plan (2021-JCJQ-JJ-0284, 2022-JCJQ-JJ-0237), CAST Creative Foundation (1020J20210117), Advanced Laser Technology Laboratory Foundation of Anhui Province (AHL2021QN03, AHL2022ZR03) and Technology and High-level Talent Cultivation Funds of State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials of Shandong University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sorokina, T. Cr2+-doped II-VI materials for laser and nonlinear optics. Opt. Mater. 2004, 26, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yu, H.; Wang, P.; Mi, J.; Zhou, X.; Pan, J.; Wang, H.; Xie, L.; Wang, W. 1.8-µm DBR Lasers with Over 11-nm Continous Wavelength Tuning Range for Multi-Species Gas Detection. In Proceedings of the 2017 Asia Communications and Photonics Conference (ACP), Guangzhou, China, 10–13 November 2017; p. Su2B.6. [Google Scholar]
  3. Leindecker, N.; Marandi, A.; Byer, R.L.; Vodopyanov, K.L.; Jiang, J.; Hartl, I.; Fermann, M.; Schunemann, P.G. Octave-spanning ultrafast OPO with 2.6–6.1 µm instantaneous bandwidth pumped by femtosecond Tm-fiber laser. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 7046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Mingareev, I.; Weirauch, F.; Olowinsky, A.; Shah, L.; Kadwani, P.; Richardson, M. Welding of polymers using a 2 µm thulium fiber laser. Opt. Laser Technol. 2012, 44, 2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, Y.; Fleming, F.; Mccracken, R.A.; Liebig, C.; Mcdaniel, S.; Cook, G.; Laporta, P.; Kar, A.K.; Galzerano, G. Hot-isostatic-pressed Cr:ZnSe ultrafast laser at 2.4 μm. Opt. Laser Technol. 2022, 154, 108300. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lan, J.; Cui, Q.; Wang, Y.; Xu, B.; Xu, H.; Cai, Z. Single-mode oscillation of a diode-pumped Nd:YAG microchip laser at 1835 nm. Opt. Mater. 2016, 60, 590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Daniel, J.M.O.; Simakov, N.; Tokurakawa, M.; Ibsen, M.; Clarkson, W.A. Ultra-short wavelength operation of a thulium fibre laser in the 1660–1750 nm wavelength band. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 18269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bai, F.; Wang, Q.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Sun, W.; Wan, X.; Li, P.; Jin, G.; Zhang, H. Efficient 1.8 µm KTiOPO4 optical parametric oscillator pumped within an Nd:YAG/SrWO4 Raman laser. Opt. Lett. 2011, 36, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhu, H.; Guo, J.; Duan, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, C.; Wang, H.; Fan, D. Efficient 1.7 µm light source based on KTA-OPO derived by Nd:YVO4 self-Raman laser. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, H.; Huang, H.; Wang, S.; Shen, D. A high-peak-power orthogonally-polarized multi-wavelength laser at 1.6-1.7 µm based on the cascaded nonlinear optical frequency conversion. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 24857. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lei, P.; Ding, X.; Bai, Y.; Yu, X.; Jiang, G.; Li, T.; Sun, B.; Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Wu, L.; et al. 1.8-μm MgO: PPLN optical parametric oscillator pumped by Nd: YVO4/YVO4 2nd-Stokes Raman laser. Results Phys. 2021, 29, 104703. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wallace, R. Oscillation of the 1.833-µ line in Nd3+:YAG. IEEE J. Quantum Elect. 1971, 7, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cai, Y.; Xu, B.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, Q.; Xu, X.; Song, Q.; Li, D.; Xu, J.; Buchvarov, I. High power and energy generation in a Nd:YAG single-crystal fiber laser at 1834  nm. Photon. Res. 2019, 7, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhou, Z.; Wang, Y.; Xu, B.; Xu, H.; Cai, Z.; Xu, X.; Li, D.; Xu, J. Crystal and ceramic lasers at 1.83 μm operating on 4F3/2 → 4I15/2 transition. Opt. Mater. 2017, 70, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Zhang, H.; Sun, D.; Luo, J.; Quan, C.; Chen, M.; Hu, L.; Han, Z.; Dong, K. Effect of Tm3+ concentration on structure, defect, and spectral properties of Tm: YAP crystals. Appl. Phys. A 2021, 127, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ju, Y. Comparative study of LD-pumped Tm:YAG and Tim:LuAG lasers. Laser Phys. 2008, 18, 722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Luan, C.; Yang, K.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, S.; Qiao, W.; Li, T.; Feng, T.; Liu, C.; Qiao, J.; Zheng, L.; et al. Dual-loss-modulated Q-switched Tm:LuAG laser with AOM and monolayer graphene. Appl. Optics 2015, 54, 8024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, G.; Liu, H.; Lu, F.; Wen, X.; Gu, Y.; Wang, Y. Analysis on preferential free running laser wavelength and performance modeling of Tm3+-doped YAP and YLF. Appl. Optics 2014, 53, 4987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sulc, J.; Jelinkova, H.; Koranda, P.; Cerny, P.; Jabczynski, J.; Zendzian, W.; Kwiatkowski, J.; Urata, Y.; Higuchi, M. Comparison of tunable lasers based on diode pumped Tm-doped crystals. In Proceedings of the 16th Polish-slovak-czech Optical Conference on Wave and Quantum Aspects of Contemporary Optics, Polanica Zdroj, Poland, 18–20 September 2008; Volume 7141, p. 71410C. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lan, J.; Xu, B.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, H.; Cai, Z.; Xu, X.; Li, D.; Soulard, R.; Moncorgé, R.; Xu, J. Tunable and passively Q-switched laser operation of Tm:CaYAlO4 between 1848 nm and 1876 nm. Opt. Laser Technol. 2019, 109, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Na, Q.; Xu, C.; Huang, Z.; He, M.; Chen, Z.; Xu, T.; Wang, L.; Yan, P.; Li, Y.; Luo, S.; et al. High-power and high-efficiency short wavelength operation of a Tm:YLF laser at 1.83  µm. Opt. Lett. 2019, 44, 4403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Na, Q.; Xu, C.; Chen, H.; Yin, J.; Wang, J.; Yu, Y.; Yang, J.; Wang, L.; Yan, P.; Ruan, S. Continuous-wave and mode-locking operation of Tm:YAP lasers near 1.8 μm. Opt. Laser Technol. 2021, 142, 107225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Walsh, B.M.; Barnes, N.P.; Di Bartolo, B. Branching ratios, cross sections, and radiative lifetimes of rare earth ions in solids: Application to Tm3+ and Ho3+ ions in LiYF4. J. Appl. Phys. 1998, 83, 2772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Guo, L.; Yang, Y.L.; Wang, R.H.; Zhang, B.T.; Li, T.; Zhao, S.Z.; He, J.L.; Yang, K.J. Experimental and Theoretical Study of an Actively Q-Switched Tm:YLF Laser with an Acousto-Optic Modulator. Molecules 2021, 26, 7324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Song, F.; Zhang, C.; Ding, X.; Xu, J.; Zhang, G.; Leigh, M.; Peyghambarian, N. Determination of thermal focal length and pumping radius in gain medium in laser diode-pumped Nd:YVO4 laser. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81, 2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, Z.; Wang, X.; Chen, G.; Bai, J.; Ren, Y.; Zhao, W.; Hou, X. Experimental study of mode matching of double-end-pumped solid-stated lasers. Acta Photonica Sin. 2002, 31, 223. [Google Scholar]
  27. Sheintop, U.; Perez, E.; Noach, S. Narrow bandwidth tunable watt level Tm:YAP laser using two etalons. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Photonics, Optics and Laser Technology, Madeira, Portugal, 25–27 January 2018; pp. 303–307. [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu, X.; Yang, K.; Zhao, S.; Li, T.; Li, G.; Li, D.; Guo, X.; Zhao, B.; Zheng, L.; Su, L.; et al. Kilo-hertz-level Q-switched laser characteristics of a Tm,Y:CaF2 crystal. Opt. Mater. Express 2017, 7, 4352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Feng, T.; Yang, K.; Zhao, S.; Qiao, W.; Zhao, J.; Li, D.; Li, G.; Li, T.; Zheng, L.; Xu, J. An acoustic-optically Q-switched Tm:SSO laser at 2 μm. Opt. Commun. 2015, 336, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic setup of the 1.83 µm Tm:YLF laser.
Figure 1. Schematic setup of the 1.83 µm Tm:YLF laser.
Photonics 10 00876 g001
Figure 2. Optical transmission curves of the input (red solid line) and output (black solid line) mirrors.
Figure 2. Optical transmission curves of the input (red solid line) and output (black solid line) mirrors.
Photonics 10 00876 g002
Figure 3. The relationship between the threshold pump power and the crystal length.
Figure 3. The relationship between the threshold pump power and the crystal length.
Photonics 10 00876 g003
Figure 4. The output powers of Tm:YLF laser in CW regimes.
Figure 4. The output powers of Tm:YLF laser in CW regimes.
Photonics 10 00876 g004
Figure 5. Thermal focal length versus incident pump power.
Figure 5. Thermal focal length versus incident pump power.
Photonics 10 00876 g005
Figure 6. Average output powers of the AO Q-switched 1.83 µm laser. Inset: the output power stability diagram.
Figure 6. Average output powers of the AO Q-switched 1.83 µm laser. Inset: the output power stability diagram.
Photonics 10 00876 g006
Figure 7. (a) Pulse duration, (b) pulse energy and (c) peak power of 1.83 µm Tm:YLF laser.
Figure 7. (a) Pulse duration, (b) pulse energy and (c) peak power of 1.83 µm Tm:YLF laser.
Photonics 10 00876 g007
Figure 8. The typical pulse train at 5 kHz and single pulse profile.
Figure 8. The typical pulse train at 5 kHz and single pulse profile.
Photonics 10 00876 g008
Figure 9. Output spectra of Tm:YLF lasers. Inset: the output spectrum with a YAG etalon.
Figure 9. Output spectra of Tm:YLF lasers. Inset: the output spectrum with a YAG etalon.
Photonics 10 00876 g009
Figure 10. M2 factors of the 1.83 µm Tm:YLF laser.
Figure 10. M2 factors of the 1.83 µm Tm:YLF laser.
Photonics 10 00876 g010
Table 1. Oscillating wavelengths in theory and experiment for different lengths of Tm:YLF crystal.
Table 1. Oscillating wavelengths in theory and experiment for different lengths of Tm:YLF crystal.
Length of Tm:YLF/mmOutput Wavelength/nm
TheoryExperiment
1018301830
1218301828
1518301828
2218801887
2518801886
Table 2. Parameters used in theory calculation.
Table 2. Parameters used in theory calculation.
SymbolValue
σα [23]0.11 × 10−20 cm2@1830 nm
0.06 × 10−20 cm2@1880 nm
σe [23]0.34 × 10−20 cm2@1830 nm
0.39 × 10−20 cm2@1880 nm
Nt3.45 × 1020 cm−3
L0.02
TOC0.1 @1830 nm
0.45 @1880 nm
ωp530 µm
ωo460 µm
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lv, G.; Guo, L.; Xu, H.; Dou, X.-A.; Ye, Q.; Kong, H.; Yang, Y.; Wen, J.; Bian, J.; Yang, K. High-Power Acoustic-Optical Q-Switched 1.83 µm Tm-Doped Bulk Laser. Photonics 2023, 10, 876. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10080876

AMA Style

Lv G, Guo L, Xu H, Dou X-A, Ye Q, Kong H, Yang Y, Wen J, Bian J, Yang K. High-Power Acoustic-Optical Q-Switched 1.83 µm Tm-Doped Bulk Laser. Photonics. 2023; 10(8):876. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10080876

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lv, Guorui, Lei Guo, Haiping Xu, Xian-An Dou, Qing Ye, Hui Kong, Yaling Yang, Jiaqi Wen, Jintian Bian, and Kejian Yang. 2023. "High-Power Acoustic-Optical Q-Switched 1.83 µm Tm-Doped Bulk Laser" Photonics 10, no. 8: 876. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10080876

APA Style

Lv, G., Guo, L., Xu, H., Dou, X. -A., Ye, Q., Kong, H., Yang, Y., Wen, J., Bian, J., & Yang, K. (2023). High-Power Acoustic-Optical Q-Switched 1.83 µm Tm-Doped Bulk Laser. Photonics, 10(8), 876. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10080876

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop