Next Article in Journal
An Improved NeRF-Based Method for Augmenting, Registering, and Fusing Visible and Infrared Images
Previous Article in Journal
Design of a Transmitting Optical System for Large-Angle MEMS Lidar with High Spatial Resolution
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Standing Wave Photon Structures in Constraint Spaces

Institute of Heavy Ion Physics, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Photonics 2025, 12(9), 841; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12090841
Submission received: 18 May 2025 / Revised: 13 July 2025 / Accepted: 19 August 2025 / Published: 22 August 2025

Abstract

Based on the single-photon structure model, the standing wave electric 4-photon (SWE4-P) composite, the standing wave magnetic 4-photon (SWM4-P) composite in one-dimensional longitudinal constraint space, and the standing wave 8-photon (SW8-P) composite structure in a laser microcavity are derived. The electromagnetic field of the TM010 mode in a microwave cylindrical resonant cavity is studied and analyzed, and the photon structure basic unit of this mode is identified as the standing wave cylindrical 8-photon composite structure. The cylindrical photon is of the same size as the cavity volume, the photon volume being V = π R 2 L . The standing wave 8-photon composite structure contains an SWE4-P composite and an SWM4-P composite, with a phase difference of 90°. Therefor, the energy unit of the TM010 mode in the cavity is 8 ω .

1. Introduction

After the canonical quantization of the electromagnetic (EM) field [1,2,3], the concepts of two transverse photons, i.e., the right-spin photon and the left-spin photon, were obtained. Pan et al. wrote in [4] that photons, massless spin 1 particles, have only two eigenvalues of their spin along the direction of their propagation (wave vector k), ±ℏ. These two spin values correspond to right- and left-handed circular polarizations, respectively [4]. However, this single photon does not correspond to the concept of the circularly polarized EM field in classical electrodynamics [5]. Jackson wrote the following in his book: “The circularly polarized states are composite, which is an easy way of allowing for a phase difference between the two linearly polarized (LP) states out of which the circular states are constructed”.
A single-photon state is generally considered to contain only one photon, and it has multiple polarization quantum states [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16], such as horizontal linear polarization (HLP), vertical linear polarization (VLP), diagonal (45°) linear polarization (DLP), antidiagonal (−45°) linear polarization (ALP), right-handed circular polarization (RCP), left-handed circular polarization (LCP), etc. In fact, these polarization states are not true single-photon states. The results of the single-photon structure model [17] show that these quantum states are all 4-photon composite monomers. Here, to distinguish the circular polarization states, the photons with spin angular momentum of ±ℏ are defined as right-/left-spin photons, while the 4-photon composite monomers with spin angular momentum of ±4ℏ are called right-/left-handed circular polarization 4-photon monomers.
The photon is deemed by some people to be a derived concept: it arises as a ripple of the EM field. Or, instead, they view the EM field as fundamental, with the photon appearing only when we correctly treat the field in a manner consistent with quantum theory. Others view the photon quantum as fundamental, with the EM field arising only in some classical limit from a collection of quantum photons. This study considers that photons and EM fields objectively exist and should not be changed by mathematical processing. It is very necessary to reveal their internal unity and consistency.
Particle physics says that “the excited state of the EM field is manifested by the appearance of photons”. “The excited state of the electron field is manifested by the appearance of electrons”. By analogy, a particle is the manifestation of its field in an excited state. The atomic excited state is defined as the shell electrons are in a high energy level and a photon equal to the energy level difference must be radiated when the electrons transition to a lower energy level. However, the “EM field excited state” is not defined, and the results of this study will clarify this fuzzy concept.
The single-photon structure model [17] constructs the photon quantum with the EM-field vector matter. Conversely, can the classical continuous EM field in constraint spaces be constructed from photons? The answer is yes. For example, the alternating electric fields in parallel-plate capacitors, the pure alternating magnetic fields in current-carrying solenoid coils, the EM fields of single longitudinal mode TEM00 in a laser [18,19] microcavity, and the EM fields of fundamental mode TM010 in a microwave cylindrical resonant (MCR) cavity can all be constructed with a multi-photon composite structure.
The constraint spaces can be divided into two categories: longitudinal constraints and transverse constraints. The former will form standing waves and the latter will still be traveling waves. Cavity types are standing wave systems, and waveguide types are traveling wave systems. MCR cavities are three-dimensional constraint spaces; guide-wave systems are laterally two-dimensional constraint spaces. This paper is devoted to a discussion of the photon structure of standing-wave EM fields, and does not enter into a discussion of the traveling wave EM fields of guide-wave systems, in the interests of brevity.

2. LP Standing Wave 4-Photon Composite

When a pair of LP photons are reflected back and forth between two parallel conducting planes, the reflected photon pair at the incident point has a half-wave loss relative to the incident photon pair. There are two cases: One is that the magnetic field component is reversed, and the electric field component remains unchanged. The other is that the electric field component is reversed, and the magnetic field component remains unchanged. Thus, between two parallel conducting planes, when the reflected LP photon pairs meet and superimpose with the incident LP photon pairs to form a standing wave (since their velocity cancels out to zero) 4-photon (SW4-P) composite, there are two types: One is the magnetic field component canceling out to zero, leaving only the electric field component to overlap and form a LP standing wave electric 4-photon (SWE4-P) composite. The second is that the electric field components cancel each other out to zero, leaving only the magnetic field components to overlap and form a standing wave magnetic 4-photon (SWM4-P) composite. Below we discuss them respectively.

2.1. SWE4-P Composite

Between two parallel conducting planes, suppose that E1H1 and E2H2 are the incident LP photon pairs, E3H3 and E4H4 are the reflected LP photon pairs, and both are defined with respect to one of the reflecting planes. When they meet and co-volume superpose, the electric field components of the photon pairs E1H1 and E2H2 polarize in the y axis and are in phase with the electric field components of the photon pairs E3H3 and E4H4. When their magnetic field components are at the 180° phase, as shown in Figure 1a, they form a SWE4-P composite. Figure 1a–d show the orientation of the electric-field and magnetic-field substance vectors in each of the four photons at phase points 0 ° ,     90 ° ,   180 ° , and 270 ° , respectively.
When the photon E1H1 ( ( E p   +   i H p ) V P e i ( k z - ω t ) ) and the photon E3H3 ( ( E p   - i H p ) V p e - i ( k z - ω t ) ) are the right-spin photon along the k direction and left-spin photon along the −k direction, respectively, and their resultant wave vector is zero and the resultant velocity is also zero, becoming a standing wave photon pair, their magnetic field components H1 and H3 are always in opposite directions and become hidden components that are invisible, and their electric field components E1 and E3 are always in phase and doubled, becoming “manifest components”. Here, Ep and Hp are the electric and magnetic field densities of a single photon, respectively, and Vp is the single-photon volume.
Likewise, when the photons E2H2 ( ( E p   -   i H p ) V P e i ( k z - ω t ) ) and E4H4 ( ( E p   +   i H p ) V P e - i ( k z - ω t ) ) are the left-spin photon along the k direction and the right-spin photon along the −k direction, respectively, and their resultant wave vector is equal to zero, and the resultant velocity is also equal to zero, they also become a standing wave photon pair; the synthetic magnetic field component is also a “hidden component”, and the electric field component is also a “manifest component”.
The total spin angular momentum of the same-body -photon synthesis is equal to zero, the total wave vector is also equal to zero, the total magnetic field component is always equal to zero, and there is only the total electric field component Ey, which is shown a pure electric field oscillating harmonically along the y axis. Looking at the point z = 0, it is easy to see that the total electric field Ey of the standing wave 4-photons E1H1, E3H3, E2H2 and E4H4 can be calculated by the following formula:
E y ( t ) = ( E p   +   i H p ) e - i ω t   +   ( E p   -   i H p ) e i ω t   +   ( E p   -   i H p ) e - i ω t   +   ( E p   +   i H p ) e i ω t       = 2 E p e i ω t + 2 E p e - i ω t = 4 E p   cos ω t
Its energy
u 4 p = V p 2 π 0 π ε 0 [ ( E y ( ω t ) ] 2 d ( ω t ) = V p 2 π 0 π ε 0 [ 4 E p cos ω t ] 2 d ( ω t ) = 4 ω
The SWE4-P composite provides a pure alternating electric field, similar to the pure alternating field inside a capacitor. It can be said that the SWE4-P composite is the basic unit that constitutes a pure alternating electric field.

2.2. SWM4-P Composite

Between the two parallel conducting planes, the photons H1E1 and H2E2 are the reflected x-linearly polarized photon pairs (wave vector −k), and the photons H3E3 and H4E4 are the incident x-linearly polarized photon pairs (wave vector k). They meet and superpose into a 4-photon composite. Among them, H1E1 is a left-spin photon along the −k direction, H3E3 is a right-spin photon along the k direction, and they form one stationary pair; H2E2 is a right-spin photon along the −k direction, H4E4 is a left-spin photon along the k direction, and they form the other stationary pair. At 90° phase, the phase of the magnetic field components of the photon pairs H1E1 and H2E2 is the same as that of the photon pair H3E3 and H4E4, their magnetic field pointing to the −x axis as shown in Figure 2b, while the phase of their electric field components is always opposite and cancel each other out to zero. Figure 2a–d show the orientation of the magnetic- and electric-field substance vectors of each photon at phase 0 ° ,   90 ° ,   180 ° , and 270 ° , respectively.
The synthetic total spin angular momentum of the four photons of the composite is equal to zero, the total wave vector is also equal to zero, the total electric field component is always equal to zero, and there is only one total magnetic field component Hx, without other components, which is shown as a pure magnetic field oscillating harmonically along the x axis as follows:
H x ( t ) = ( - E 1   +   i H 1 ) e i ω   t   +   ( E 2   +   i H 2 ) e i ω   t   +   ( E 3   +   i H 3 ) e - i ω   t   +   ( - E 4 +   i H 4 ) e - i ω   t = 2 H p e i ( ω   t + π / 2 )   + 2 H p e - i ( ω   t + π / 2 )   =   4 H p cos ( ω t   + π   /   2 )   =   4 H p sin ω t
The total magnetic field is a pure alternating magnetic field, just like the pure alternating magnetic field inside the current-carrying solenoid coil. It is seen that the SWM4-P composite is the basic unit that constitutes the alternating magnetic field.
Just like the SWE4-P composite, there is no net energy flow, with a Poynting vector of s = 0. As for the effective energy of the SWM4-P composite, there is the following equation:
u 4 p   =   V p μ 0 2 π   0 π   ( - 4 H p   sin ω t ) 2 d ( ω t )   =   4 μ 0 H p 2 V p   =   4 ω
This shows that the energy of the SWM4-P composite is also the energy ( 4 ω ) of four single photons, and the conservation of energy is observed.

3. The Photon Structure of the Single Longitudinal Mode TEM00 in a Laser Microcavity

The simplest laser microcavity consists of an active medium and two reflecting mirrors and is an open cavity without boundaries on the sides. The eigenmode photon runs back and forth between the two reflective surfaces, activating the medium particles to produce stimulated emission, and the positive feedback continuously proliferates, producing optical amplification. The function of the resonator cavity is to preferentially amplify the eigenmode of light with a certain frequency and consistent direction, while suppressing light from other frequencies and directions. A strong beam of light is formed in the cavity with the same direction of propagation, frequency, and phase, i.e., a laser. To extract the laser from the cavity, one of the reflecting mirrors can be made partially transmissive [18,19], with the transmitted part becoming the available laser, and the reflected part in the cavity continuing to proliferate photons. The single longitudinal mode TEM00 in the optical resonator cavity is a standing wave mode, and the basic unit of the output laser is a propagating LP4-photon (LP4-P) monomer [17]. The intracavity photon structure is a standing wave 8-photon (SW8-P) composite structure formed by the superposition of the reflected LP4-P monomer and the incident LP4-P monomer, as shown in Figure 3. The LP4-P monomer (E1H1, E1H1, E2H2, E2H2) can either be transmitted out as an output laser unit or reflected back.
When the laser output mirror is taken as the reflection reference plane, and the tangential component of the electric field on the reflection surface is required to be equal to zero (boundary conditions), requiring that the electric field component of the reflected photon is reversed (half-wave loss), while the magnetic field component remains unchanged, the reflected monomer (E3H3, E3H3, E4H4, E4H4) and the incident monomer (E1H1, E1H1, E2H2, E2H2) meet and superpose into an 8-photon composite structure along the way. Since the wave vectors cancel out in opposite directions, the velocities also cancel out to zero, resulting in a standing wave 8-photon (SW8-P) composite structure. This composite structure is just a specific structure in the constraint space, and is not a stable structure.
Figure 4a shows that the electric field E1 of photon 1 and the electric field E3 of photon 3 are always opposite and cancel each other out to zero, and the electric field E1 of photon 1 and the electric field E3 of photon 3 are also always opposite and cancel each other out to zero. Only E2, E2, E4, and E4’ contribute to the x-directed electric field as follows:
E x   =   4 E p   cos ω t
The four photons E2H2, E2H2’, E4H4, and E4H4’ form a standing wave electric 4-photon (SWE4-P) composite, which produces a pure alternating electric field.
Figure 4b shows that the magnetic field components H2 of photon 2 and H4 of photon 4 are always in opposite directions, canceling each other out to zero. The magnetic field components H2 of photon 2 and H4 of photon 4 are always opposite, canceling each other out to zero. Only H1, H1’, H3, and H3’ contribute to the magnetic field in the y direction as follows:
H y = 4 H p sin ω t
The four photons H1E1, H1E1’, H3E3, and H3E3’ form a standing wave magnetic 4-photon (SWM4-P) composite, which produces a pure alternating magnetic field.
It is apparent that in this standing wave 8-photon composite structure, four of the photons have their magnetic fields canceled to zero because of their opposite directions; the electric fields of these four photons are doubled and strengthened because of their same directions, thus only the electric field is shown. In this standing wave 8-photon structure, the other four photons have just canceled their electric fields and only display the magnetic field. Moreover, the electric field and magnetic field are orthogonal, and their time phases differ by 90°, i.e., sine and cosine functions. This is determined by the fact that the electromagnetic field matter in the single photon structure model is an orthogonal vector, which is a universal law. The total energy of the SW8-P composite structure is calculated as follows:
u 8 p =   1 2 V p π 0 π [ μ 0 ( 4 H p cos ω t ) 2   +   ε 0 ( 4 E p   sin ω t ) 2 ] ( d ω t ) = 4 V p ( ε 0 ( E p 2 + μ 0 H p 2 ) = 8 ω .

4. The Photon Structure of the TM010 Mode in an MCR Cavity

The TM010 mode of the MCR cavity has the lowest resonant frequency ( ω 010   = J 1 ( 2.405 ) c / R ) and the longest resonant wavelength ( λ 010 =   2 π R / 2.405   =   2.62 R ). A TM010 single-mode operation is often used to accelerate charged particles, with the cavity called an accelerating cavity [20] and the mode called an accelerating mode. Now, we will begin to discuss the microwave photon structures of the TM010 mode in the MCR cavity, and compare it with the mathematical description of the classical EM field.

4.1. The EM Field of the TM010 Mode in an MCR Cavity

In the MCR cavity with inner radius R and length L, the exact expressions of the EM field distribution of all resonant modes in the cavity are given in classical electrodynamics [21,22]. The EM field distribution of the TM010 mode is the simplest, as follows:
E z   =   E 0 J 0   j 01 ρ / R cos ω t H φ   =   ( ω ε 0 R / j 01 ) J 0 j 01 ρ / R E 0 sin ω t E ρ   =     E φ   =   H ρ   =   H z   =   0
The TM010 mode is an accelerating mode with only two field components. The electric field component Ez is in the z axis direction, while the magnetic field component Hφ is in the angular φ direction, and the phase difference between the electric field component and the magnetic field component is 90 ° , where J0(x) is the zero-order Bessel function, J0’(x) is the derivative of zero-order Bessel function, and J 0 ( x )   = - J 1 ( x ) , J 1 ( x ) is the first-order Bessel function. The j 01   is the first zero point of the zero-order Bessel function, and its value j 01   = 2.405. The Bessel function curves are shown in Figure 5a. On the ρ = 0 axis of the cavity, J0(0) = 1. This means that the electric field has the maximum value, Ez (0, z) = E0. At ρ = R, the side wall of the cavity, because J0(2.405) = 0, the electric field is zero, i.e., Ez (R, z) = 0. At the magnetic field at the ρ = 0 axis, because J 1 ( 0 ) = 0 , the magnetic field is zero, i.e., Hφ(0, z) = 0. However, near the side wall of the cavity, where ρ = R, J1(2.405) = 0.5019, and the magnetic field Hφ(R, z) has a bigger value. Using the relation J 0 ( x )   = - J 1 ( x ) , the Hφ in Equation (8) can be calculated as follows:
H φ   =   ω ε 0 R / j 01   E 0 J 1 ( j 01 ρ / R ) sin ω t
The amplitude of the angular magnetic field at ρ = R is proportional to J1(2.405) (Figure 5a). The spatial distribution of the classical electric and magnetic fields in most spaces between the cavity axis and the cavity side wall is shown in Figure 5b (note there is a 90° phase difference between the electric field and the magnetic field). The field in the cavity is axisymmetric; there is no periodicity in both the eφ direction and the ez direction. The electron beam bunch is injected along the z axis in a suitable half-period, which can be accelerated by the axial electric field Ez. When the electric field peaks to accelerate the charged particles, the transverse circular magnetic field is nearly zero, since there is a 90° phase difference between the electric field Ez and the magnetic field Hφ.

4.2. Consideration to Construct the EM Field of the TM010 Mode with Photons

The intracavity field is a standing wave field. A single photon cannot be localized; a single LP photon pair cannot be localized either. Only co-volume identical LP photon pairs with opposite wave vectors k can be stationary since the wave vectors cancel out to zero, causing their velocities to also cancel out to zero (additionally, the photons in an MCR cavity are zero velocity photons). That is to say, the photon structure allowed in the resonant cavity can only be the standing wave 4-photon composite. Although they have no translational velocity, they do keep a spin velocity, i.e., a spin angular velocity.
Next, we will look at the resonant wavelength of the TM010 mode, λ 010 = 2.62 R , and the photon diameter in free space, d = 0.5032λ. Now, let d     =     0.5032 λ 010     1.32 R < 2R. Compared with the cavity diameter 2R and cavity length L < 2R, the photon size is not small and is comparable to the cavity size, so the cavity volume can only accommodate the volume of one photon.
Furthermore, the photons in the cavity must be deformed into a cylinder to satisfy the Helmholtz equation and the boundary conditions of the MCR cavity. The cylindrical photons of length L and radius R have the cavity axis as their symmetry axis. The electric-field substance vector, the magnetic-field substance vector, the wave vector, and the spin angular momentum vector of the photon in free space are all Cartesian vectors [17]. After entering the constraint cavity space, due to the interaction with the cavity wall, these vectors of each cylindrical photon turn into the orthogonal curve vectors (Eez, Heφ, keρ) of the cylindrical coordinate system (ρ, φ, z); eρ, eφ, and ez are unit vectors on the ρ, φ, and z axis, respectively.
On the ρ = 0 axis, J0(0) = 1 and J1(0) = 0, so Ez(0, z) = E0cosωt and Hφ(0, z) = 0. Without a magnetic field, there is a pure alternating electric field. And, at the side wall of the cavity where ρ = R, J0(2.405) = 0 and J1(2.405) 0.519, Ez (R, φ, z) = 0 and Hφ (R, φ, z) = −ωε0(R/2.405)J1(2.405)E0sinωt. Without an electric field, there is a pure alternating magnetic field. The electric-field and magnetic-field components are mutually phase-shifted by 90° and superimposed orthogonally elsewhere.
For the amplitude of the electric field Ez given by Equation (8) and the amplitude of the magnetic field Hφ given by Equation (9), it is observed in Figure 5a that, at x ≈ 1.44, the zero-order Bessel function J0(x) and the first-order Bessel function J1(x) have a point of intersection, i.e., J0(1.44) J1(1.44). Using this value, for any microwave frequency, the amplitude ratio can be calculated Ez/Hφ= 1/(ωε0R/2.405) 377Ω, which is consistent with the wave impedance of the photon [17].
Considering that the field in the cavity is axisymmetric, there is no periodicity in either the angular eφ direction or the longitudinal ez direction. For cylindrical photons, the electric and magnetic field matter vectors are located on the cylindrical surface (z, φ); the wave vector and angular momentum are along the radial eρ or −eρ.
In order to satisfy the conditions of pure electric field Ez (near axis) and pure magnetic field (near side wall), and to satisfy the condition of a phase difference of 90° between them, we need two kinds of SW4-photon composite. The SWE4-P composite can provide a pure electric field along the z direction. The field substance distribution of each of its photons along the eρ direction obeys the J 0 2.405 ρ / R function, and is uniform along both the eφ and ez directions. The SWM4-P composite can provide a pure magnetic field Hφ along the eφ direction. The field substance distribution of each of its photons along the eρ direction obeys the J 1 2.405 ρ / R function, and is uniform along both the eφ and ez directions.
The superposition of these two kinds of SW4-P composite provides both the harmonic oscillating electric field along the z direction and the harmonic oscillating magnetic field along the eφ direction in the MCR cavity. The SWE4-P composite and the SWM4-P composite are configured in a 1:1 ratio, satisfying the principle of equal partition for EM energy in the cavity.
In regard to the changes over time, it is interesting that the SWE4-P composite obeys the cosωt function and the SWM4-P composite obeys the sinωt function. Looking at the structure of the EM field given by Equations (8) and (9) and comparing it with the electric and magnetic field expressions for the SW8-P composite structure given in Section 3, one easily realizes that this TM010 mode’s photon structure is a typical SW8-P composite structure. There is an inherent correlation between the SWE4-P composite and the SWM4-P composite. That is, the spatial orthogonal, the time phase difference in the 90° relation, and the volume integral of its electric field energy are equal to that of the magnetic field energy (i.e., each half of the EM energy).
This SW8-P composite structure is the basic unit of the TM010 mode photon structure. Below, we will discuss each of these in detail.

4.2.1. The SWE4-P Composite of the TM010 Mode

The EM-field matter distribution of each photon in the cylindrical-shaped SWE4-P composite follows the zero-order Bessel J 0 ( j 01 ρ / R ) function along the radial ρ and is uniformly distributed along both the angular φ and the z axis. For a cylindrical photon, the electric and magnetic field matter vectors (E, H) of each photon are located on the cylindrical surface (φ, z), while the wave vector k and angular momentum j are in the radial ( ± e ρ ) direction. Right-/left-spin photons in free space obey the E × ( ± H ) k spin rule. How do we implement the spin rule for right-/left-spin cylindrical photons? We divide each cylindrical photon into an infinite number of differential volumes (dV) by using the three orthogonal curve surfaces ( ( ρ , φ ) ,   ( φ ,   z ) ,   ( z , ρ ) ). In each dV the EM-field matter vectors (E, H) of each photon spin/rotate about the local wave vector k at ω according to the E × ( ± H ) k spin rules, as in the Cartesian coordinate system shown in Figure 6.
Intracavity four cylindrical photons E1H1, E2H2, E3H3, and E4H4, at ωt = 0°, are shown in Figure 6a–d, respectively. The electric field substance vectors are all along the z axis and become manifest components, while the magnetic field substance vectors cancel out to zero and become hidden components. The direction of the electric field is along the z axis, and the magnetic field direction is along the angular φ and is connected to the head and the tail. In order to see this clearly, take the same dV as shown in a’–d’ of Figure 6. The H1 of photon E1H1 is along the −eφ direction, with an E1H1 right-spin. Both its wave vector k and its angular momentum j are along the eρ direction. The H2 of photon E2H2 is also along the −eφ direction, with an E2H2 left-spin. Its wave vector k is along the eρ direction, but its angular momentum j is along the −eρ direction. The H3 of photon E3H3 is along the eφ direction, with an E3H3 left-spin. Its wave vector k is along the −eρ direction, but its angular momentum j is along the eρ direction. The H4 of photon E4H4 is along the eφ direction, with an E4H4 right-spin. Both its wave vector k and angular momentum j are along the −eρ direction. In a word, the field substance superposition of the same dV belonging to these four photons results in a zero magnetic-field vector synthesis, zero total wave vector synthesis, zero total angular momentum synthesis, and four times electric-field vector synthesis of a single photon. This result is applicable for every SWE4-P composite.
Figure 6 shows only the vector direction at the initial phase (ωt = 0°) of photon E1H1, E2H2, E3H3, and E4H4 within the SWE4-P composite. Figure 7a–d show the direction of the electric field substance vector and the magnetic field substance vector in the same differential volume belonging to four different photons at 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270° phase points, respectively. Note that H1 and H3 are always in opposite directions and cancel each other out to zero, and H2 and H4 are always in opposite directions and cancel each other out to zero. The dV, a–d of each photon in Figure 6 only corresponds to Figure 7a.
The result of the superposition of four photons is that the total magnetic field is always zero and invisible, and the total electric field E is a manifest component, which is four times the intensity of the single photon. There is no net wave vector and no net angular momentum in any dV, but the substances in each dV which belong to each photon keep an independent spin. The z-direction electric field of the TM010 mode is contributed by the SWE4-P composite alone. Obviously, this is the basic unit of the z-direction electric field of the TM010 mode in the cavity. As a result, the pure electric field oscillates along the z direction with angular frequency ω. The electric field generated by the SWE4-P composite can be expressed as follows:
( E z ) 4 p   =     4 E p J 0 ( j 01 ρ / R ) cos ω   t

4.2.2. The SWM4-P Composite of the TM010 Mode

Each photon in the SWM4-P composite is also deformed into a cylinder of length L and radius R. The EM-field matter distribution of each photon in the SWM4-P composite follows the first-order Bessel J 1 ( j 01 ρ   /   R ) function along the radial ρ direction and is uniformly distributed along both the angular φ and the z-axis direction. The electric field E and magnetic field H of each photon are located on the cylindrical surface (φ, z), while the wave vector k and angular momentum j are along the ± eρ direction, as shown in Figure 8. A significant difference from the SWE4-P composite is that the superposition of four photons results in the total electric field component being zero. Instead, the total magnetic field component along the eφ direction is oscillating harmonically at the angular frequency ω.
We will use a dV to illustrate the physical mechanism. As shown in Figure 8, at ωt = 90° phase, the magnetic field Hi (i = 1, 2, 3, 4) belonging to the four photons of the SWM4-P composite are all along the −eφ direction, while their electric field components are pairwise opposite to each other and cancel out to zero. Specifically, in the dV, the magnetic field H1 belonging to photon 1 is along the −eφ direction, the photon H1E1 is left-spin, its wave vector k1 is along the −eρ direction, and its angular momentum j1 is along the eρ direction as shown in Figure 8a’. The magnetic field H2 belonging to photon 2 is also along the −eφ direction, the photon H2E2 is right-spin, and both its wave vector k2 and angular momentum j2 are along the −eρ direction as shown in Figure 8b. The magnetic field H3 belonging to photon 3 is along the −eφ direction, the photon H3E3 is right-spin, and both its wave vector k3 and angular momentum j3 are along the eρ direction as shown in Figure 8c’. The magnetic field H4 belonging to photon 4 is along the −eφ direction, the photon H4E4 is left-spin, its wave vector k4 is along the eρ direction, and its angular momentum j4 is along the −eρ direction as shown in Figure 8d’. In a word, in the same dV belonging to the four photons, the superposition result is that the total electric-field vector synthesis is zero, the total wave vector synthesis is zero, the total angular momentum synthesis is zero, and the total magnetic-field vector synthesis is four times that of the single photon. This result is applicable for every SWM4-P composite.
Figure 9a–d show the direction of the electric field substance vector and the magnetic field substance vector in the dV shared by four cylindrical photons at the four phase points of 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270°, respectively. Note the E1 and E3 always cancel each other out to zero, and E2 and E4 also always cancel each other out to zero. The field synthesized by the four cylinder photons is a pure magnetic field. The magnetic field produced by the SWM4-P composite harmonically oscillates at an angular frequency ω along the eφ direction.
( H φ ) 4 p =   - 4 H p J 1 ( 2.405 ρ / R ) sin ω t
The SWM4-P composite is the basic unit of the angular magnetic field of the TM010 mode in the MCR cavity.

4.3. The SW8-P Composite Structure of the TM010 Mode

The superposition of an SWE4-P composite and an SWM4-P composite with a total of 8 photons as a basic unit constitutes the EM field of the TM010 mode. The pure electric field Ez near the axis is contributed by the SWE4-P composite alone, the pure magnetic field Hφ near the side wall is contributed by the SWM4-P composite alone, and the mixed electric and magnetic fields with a phase difference of 90° in other regions are jointly contributed by both the SWE4-P composite and the SWM4-P composite. The co-volume superposition of the SWE4-P and SWM4-P composites (total of eight photons) as the basic unit provides the energy storage for the TM010 of the MCR cavity. That is to say, the energy storage in the cavity increases step by step with the unit ( 8 ω ) of eight photons. This is a result deduced from a single-photon structure model [17].
The physical process that occurs in the cavity can be understood through the classical EM theory. The electric and magnetic fields of eigenmodes that satisfy the Helmholtz equation and boundary conditions of the MCR cavity oscillate at an angular frequency ω. The electric energy is converted into magnetic energy, and the magnetic energy is converted into electric energy, and so on. The electric and magnetic energies are converted into each other.
From the photon’s point of view, the physical process occurring in the cavity is the result of the EM-field vector matter spinning/rotating independently about their respective wave vectors ( ± e ρ ) at the angular velocity ω in each dV of the eight cylindrical photons. This physical mechanism is more intuitive, concise, and clear than the abstract image of “electric and magnetic energy can be converted into each other”. Of course, the classical theory of the EM field is still very accurate in its mathematical description, which is unrivaled from the photon′s point of view.

5. Discussion

The standing wave 8-photon composite structure is the inevitable result of the superposition of two running wave 4-photon monomers moving in opposite directions in a longitudinal-constraint space. The standing wave electric 4-photon composite and the standing wave magnetic 4-photon composite, which being out of phase by 90°, are specific states in which the running wave 4-photon monomers exist in a longitudinal-constraint space. Once it leaves this constraint space, the standing wave 4-photon composite ceases to exist. You absolutely cannot extract the standing wave electric 4-photon composite or the standing wave magnetic 4-photon composite from the cavity space. What can be extracted from the cavity space is only the running wave 4-photon monomer, which is commonly referred to as the “single photon” in the current literatures. The 2-photon generated by type II spontaneous parametric down-conversion (type II SPDC in BBO) [23] is actually two 4-photon monomers with cross-polarization. And, the so-called “non-Gaussian triphotons entangled state” [24,25] is actually an entangled state of three “running wave 4-photon monomers”. According to the single-photon structure model [17], the normal unit of the pump laser is a running wave 4-photon monomer, and whether it is divided into two monomers or three monomers in the nonlinear crystal, each of its monomers is still the running wave 4-photon monomer (although people still refer to it as a “single photon”).

6. Summary and Conclusions

Based on the single-photon structure model [17], the SWE4-P composite and the SWM4-P composite are deduced in one-dimensional constraint space. They are the basic units of a pure alternating electric field and a pure alternating magnetic field, respectively. The SW8-P composite structure is deduced from the laser microcavity. It can simulate the resonant EM field of the TM010 mode in the MCR cavity, but the photon has already been deformed into a cylinder, its wave vector is radial, and the EM-field matter vectors are located inside the cylindrical surface (φ, z).
On the one hand, the TM010 mode has the lowest resonance frequency and the largest resonant-photon volume compared to photons of other modes. The volume of the entire cavity is one photon’s volume, and its EM field, though it is at least 8-photons superimposed, is always confined inside of a single photon’s volume, so it only shows a classical continuity and cannot possibly show particle nature. This is the root cause of why the EM fields and photons look so different. This way, photons and classical EM fields no longer appear completely different and unrelated, but rather have intrinsic unity and consistency.
In a popular sense, the standing wave EM field and the corresponding standing wave photon structure are the same thing. There is no so-called “excited state” and “ground state” in an EM field. Photons and EM fields are just two different ways of description. The lower the frequency, the more convenient it is to describe it as a field (within the photon volume), and, the higher the frequency, the more convenient it is to describe it as a photon (outside the photon volume). This is also significant for quantum optics.
On the other hand, for a cylindrical photon, not only does its exterior shape vary extremely, but its content changes even more significantly. First of all, its wave vector becomes a “variable vector (eρ)”; secondly, one of its field substance vectors (eφ, ez) also becomes a variable vector. In this way, the spin of each photon becomes extremely complicated. How do we perform the spin rule E × ( ± H ) k ? We perform it only by cutting the photon into infinite differential volumes with three orthogonal curved surfaces, allowing the field substance in each dV to spin around the local wave vector with angular velocity ω. The execution of the spin of each photon is so precise that the four photons (SWE4-P) cancel their magnetic field components and double the strength of their electric field components, and the other four photons (SWM4-P) cancel their electric field components and double the strength of their magnetic field components. What is it that is playing the role of manipulator so precisely? It is the mission of future studies to reveal this unknown substance. This is where the significance of this paper lies.
It can be said that the photon is a quantized EM-field particle, and that the electric and magnetic fields are the collection of the SWE4-P composite and SWM4-P composite, respectively, or said that the EM fields are the collection of the SW8-P composite structures.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

I thank Zhengxing Wang for his beneficial and useful discussion.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest. This is a free research topic after the author (ORCID id: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1931-6369) has retired, without funding.

References

  1. Gupta, S.N. Quantum Electrodynamics; Gordon & Breach Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 1977; Chapter 3; pp. 65–72. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ryder, L. Quantum Field Theory, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1996; pp. 140–166. [Google Scholar]
  3. Norbury, J.W. Quantum Field Theory; University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee: Milwaukee, WI, USA, 2000; Chapter 5; pp. 89–91. [Google Scholar]
  4. Pan, J.W.; Chen, Z.B.; Lu, C.Y.; Weinfurter, H.; Zeilinger, A.; Żukowski, M. Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2012, 84, 777–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jackson, J.D. Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1975; p. 274. [Google Scholar]
  6. White, A.G.; James, D.F.V.; Munro, W.J.; Kwiat, P.G. Exploring Hilbert Space: Accurate characterization of quantum information. Phys. Rev. A 2002, 65, 012301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. White, A.G.; James, D.; Eberhard, P.H.; Kwiat, P.G. Non-maximally Entangled States: Production, Characterization, and Utilization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 83, 3103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Young, R.J.; Stevenson, J.R.M.; Hudson, A.J.; Nicoll, C.A.; Ritchie, D.A.; Shields, A.J. Bell-inequality violation with a triggered photon-pair source. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 030406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Salter, C.L.; Stevenson, R.M.; Farrer, I.; Nicoll, C.A.; Ritchie, D.A.; Shields, D.A. An entangled-light-emitting diode. Nature 2010, 465, 594–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Mueller, M.; Bounouar, S.; Joens, K.D.; Glaessl, M.; Michler, P. On-demand generation of indistinguishable polarization-entangled photon pairs. Nat. Phot. 2014, 8, 224–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Huber, D.; Reindl, M.; Huo, Y.; Huang, H.; Wildmann, J.S.; Schmidt, O.G.; Rastelli, A.; Trotta, R. Highly indistinguishable and strongly entangled photons from symmetric GaAs quantum dots. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Keil, R.; Zopf, M.; Chen, Y.; Höfer, B.; Zhang, J.; Ding, F.; Schmidt, O.G. Solid-state ensemble of highly entangled photon sources at rubidium atomic transitions. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, Y.; Zopf, M.; Keil, R.; Ding, F.; Schmidt, O.G. Highly-efficient extraction of entangled photons from quantum dots using a broadband optical antenna. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Liu, J.; Su, R.; Wei, Y.; Yao, B.; da Silva, S.F.C.; Yu, Y.; Iles-Smith, J.; Srinivasan, K.; Rastelli, A.; Li, J.; et al. A solid-state source of strongly entangled photon pairs with high brightness and indistinguishability. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2019, 14, 586–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, H.; Hu, H.; Chung, T.-H.; Qin, J.; Yang, X.; Li, J.-P.; Liu, R.-Z.; Zhong, H.-S.; He, Y.-M.; Ding, X.; et al. On-demand semiconductor source of entangled photons which simultaneously has high fidelity, efficiency, and indistinguishability. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 122, 113602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Deng, Y.-H.; Wang, H.; Ding, X.; Duan, Z.-C.; Qin, J.; Chen, M.-C.; He, Y.; He, Y.-M.; Li, J.-P.; Li, Y.-H.; et al. Quantum interference between light sources separated by 150 million kilometers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123, 080401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zu, D. Single photon structure model and 4-photon composite monomer. Opt. Express 2025, 33, 10325–10341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hadjisolomou, P.; Jeong, T.M.; Valenta, P.; Macleod, A.J.; Shaisultanov, R.; Ridgers, C.P.; Bulanov, S.V. Attosecond gamma-ray flashes and electron-positron pairs in dyadic laser interaction with microwire. Phys. Rev. E 2025, 111, 025201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Keller, M.; Lange, B.; Hayasaka, K.; Lange, W.; Walther, H. Continuous generation of single photons with controlled waveform in an ion-trap cavity system. Nature 2004, 431, 1075–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zu, D.; Chen, J. Design study on a superconducting multicell RF accelerating cavity for use in a linear collider. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 1998, 45, 114–118. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zu, D. Electrodynamics, Revision; Tsinghua University Press: Beijing, China, 2016; pp. 159–183. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  22. Jackson, J.D. Classical Electrodynamics; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1974; Chapter 8.7. [Google Scholar]
  23. Couteau, C. Spontaneous parametric down-conversion. Contemp. Phys. 2018, 59, 291–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, D.; Barral, D.; Zhang, Y.; Xiao, M.; Bencheikh, K. Genuine tripartite non-Gaussian entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023, 130, 093602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Li, K.; Wen, J.; Cai, Y.; Ghamsari, S.V.; Li, C.; Li, F.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Xiao, M. Direct generation of time-energy-entangled W triphotons in atomic vapor. Sci. Adv. 2024, 10, eado3199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Periodic evolution of the electric- and magnetic-field vectors of each photon in the SWE4-P composite. (a) At 0° phase, E1, E2, E3, and E4 are in the same direction along the y axis; (b) At 90° phase, with E1E3 overlapping in the −x axis and E2E4 overlapping in the x axis direction, the electric field is canceled out in reverse; (c) At 180° phase, E1, E2, E3, and E4 are in the same direction along the −y axis; (d) At 270° phase, with E1E3 overlapping in the x axis and E2E4 overlapping in the −x axis, the electric field is canceled out to zero in reverse. Then, rinse and repeat. Note that H1 and H3 are always reverse canceled to zero, and H2 and H4 are always reverse canceled to zero.
Figure 1. Periodic evolution of the electric- and magnetic-field vectors of each photon in the SWE4-P composite. (a) At 0° phase, E1, E2, E3, and E4 are in the same direction along the y axis; (b) At 90° phase, with E1E3 overlapping in the −x axis and E2E4 overlapping in the x axis direction, the electric field is canceled out in reverse; (c) At 180° phase, E1, E2, E3, and E4 are in the same direction along the −y axis; (d) At 270° phase, with E1E3 overlapping in the x axis and E2E4 overlapping in the −x axis, the electric field is canceled out to zero in reverse. Then, rinse and repeat. Note that H1 and H3 are always reverse canceled to zero, and H2 and H4 are always reverse canceled to zero.
Photonics 12 00841 g001
Figure 2. Periodic evolution of the electric- and magnetic-field vectors of each photon in the SWM4-P composite. Note: E1 and E3 are always in opposite directions, and E2 and E4 are also always in opposite directions. (a) At 0° phase, H1H3 overlap in the y axis and H2H4 overlap in the −y axis; (b) At 90° phase, H1, H2, H3, and H4 are in the same direction along the −x axis; (c) At 180° phase, H1H3 overlap in the −y axis and H2H4 overlap in the y axis; (d) At 270° phase, H1, H2, H3, and H4 are in the same direction along the x axis. Then, rinse and repeat. Note that E1 and E3 are always reverse canceled to zero, and E2 and E4 are always reverse canceled to zero.
Figure 2. Periodic evolution of the electric- and magnetic-field vectors of each photon in the SWM4-P composite. Note: E1 and E3 are always in opposite directions, and E2 and E4 are also always in opposite directions. (a) At 0° phase, H1H3 overlap in the y axis and H2H4 overlap in the −y axis; (b) At 90° phase, H1, H2, H3, and H4 are in the same direction along the −x axis; (c) At 180° phase, H1H3 overlap in the −y axis and H2H4 overlap in the y axis; (d) At 270° phase, H1, H2, H3, and H4 are in the same direction along the x axis. Then, rinse and repeat. Note that E1 and E3 are always reverse canceled to zero, and E2 and E4 are always reverse canceled to zero.
Photonics 12 00841 g002
Figure 3. The standing wave 8-photon composite structure (c) in a laser microcavity is composed of an incident 4-photon monomer (a) overlapping a reflected 4-photon monomer (b). The electric field components of the reflected monomer are 180° out of phase with those of the incident monomer (subscript 3, 4 in (b) correspond to 1, 2 in (a), respectively), whereas the phase of the magnetic field components remains unchanged.
Figure 3. The standing wave 8-photon composite structure (c) in a laser microcavity is composed of an incident 4-photon monomer (a) overlapping a reflected 4-photon monomer (b). The electric field components of the reflected monomer are 180° out of phase with those of the incident monomer (subscript 3, 4 in (b) correspond to 1, 2 in (a), respectively), whereas the phase of the magnetic field components remains unchanged.
Photonics 12 00841 g003
Figure 4. The SWE4-P and the SWM4-P composites included in the SW8-P composite structure.
Figure 4. The SWE4-P and the SWM4-P composites included in the SW8-P composite structure.
Photonics 12 00841 g004
Figure 5. The EM field distribution of the TM010 mode expressed by both Equations (8) and (9). (a) Zeroth-order Bessel function and first-order Bessel functions curves. (b) Schematic diagram of the electric field line and the magnetic field line of the TM010 mode in the MCR cavity.
Figure 5. The EM field distribution of the TM010 mode expressed by both Equations (8) and (9). (a) Zeroth-order Bessel function and first-order Bessel functions curves. (b) Schematic diagram of the electric field line and the magnetic field line of the TM010 mode in the MCR cavity.
Photonics 12 00841 g005
Figure 6. The orientation of the Ez and Hφ of each cylindrical photon and the directions of the spin and wave vector of each cylindrical photon in the same dV at ωt = 0° phase for the SWE4-P composite. The magnetic fields of the photons E1H1 and E2H2 are along −eφ, as shown in (a,b), respectively, but the spins are different: the former is right-spin, while the latter is left-spin, as shown in (a′) and (b′), respectively. Their wave vectors are along the eρ direction. The magnetic fields of the photons E3H3 and E4H4 are along eφ, as shown in (c,d), respectively. But, their spins are different: the former is left-spin, and the latter is right-spin, as shown in (c′,d′), respectively. The wave vectors are along the −eρ direction.
Figure 6. The orientation of the Ez and Hφ of each cylindrical photon and the directions of the spin and wave vector of each cylindrical photon in the same dV at ωt = 0° phase for the SWE4-P composite. The magnetic fields of the photons E1H1 and E2H2 are along −eφ, as shown in (a,b), respectively, but the spins are different: the former is right-spin, while the latter is left-spin, as shown in (a′) and (b′), respectively. Their wave vectors are along the eρ direction. The magnetic fields of the photons E3H3 and E4H4 are along eφ, as shown in (c,d), respectively. But, their spins are different: the former is left-spin, and the latter is right-spin, as shown in (c′,d′), respectively. The wave vectors are along the −eρ direction.
Photonics 12 00841 g006
Figure 7. The evolution of the electric- and magnetic-field vectors in a dV belonging to the four photons (E1H1, E2H2, E3H3, E4H4) within the SWE4-P composite (displayed in the cylindrical surface (φ, z)). (a) At ω t =   0 ° , the electric-field vector of the four photons is along the z axis; (b) at ω t   =   90 ° , the electric-field vectors of the four photons pairwise cancel out to zero; (c) at ω t   =     180 ° , the electric-field vectors of the four photons are all along the −z axis; (d) at ω t   =   270 ° , the electric-field vector of the four photons pairwise cancel out to zero. The cycle starts again.
Figure 7. The evolution of the electric- and magnetic-field vectors in a dV belonging to the four photons (E1H1, E2H2, E3H3, E4H4) within the SWE4-P composite (displayed in the cylindrical surface (φ, z)). (a) At ω t =   0 ° , the electric-field vector of the four photons is along the z axis; (b) at ω t   =   90 ° , the electric-field vectors of the four photons pairwise cancel out to zero; (c) at ω t   =     180 ° , the electric-field vectors of the four photons are all along the −z axis; (d) at ω t   =   270 ° , the electric-field vector of the four photons pairwise cancel out to zero. The cycle starts again.
Photonics 12 00841 g007
Figure 8. The orientation of the Hφ and Ez of each cylindrical photon and the directions of the spin and wave vector of each cylindrical photon in the same dV at ωt = 90° phase for the SWM4-P composite. The total magnetic field directions of the four photons H1E1, H2E2, H3E3, and H4E4 are all along the −eφ direction, their resultant electric field is zero in (ad), but the spins are different: the photons H1E1 and H3E3 are right-spin, as shown in (a’,c’), respectively, while the photons H2E2 and H4E4 are left-spin, as shown in (b’,d’), respectively.
Figure 8. The orientation of the Hφ and Ez of each cylindrical photon and the directions of the spin and wave vector of each cylindrical photon in the same dV at ωt = 90° phase for the SWM4-P composite. The total magnetic field directions of the four photons H1E1, H2E2, H3E3, and H4E4 are all along the −eφ direction, their resultant electric field is zero in (ad), but the spins are different: the photons H1E1 and H3E3 are right-spin, as shown in (a’,c’), respectively, while the photons H2E2 and H4E4 are left-spin, as shown in (b’,d’), respectively.
Photonics 12 00841 g008
Figure 9. The evolution of the electric- and magnetic-field vectors from four photons (H1E1, H2E2, H3E3, H4E4) in each dV of the SWM4-P composite over a period (displayed in the cylindrical surface (φ, z)). (a) At ω t   =   0 ° , the total magnetic-field vectors of the four photons are along the ± z axis, and pairwise cancel to zero; (b) at ω t   =   90 ° , the total magnetic-field vectors of the four photons are all along the -eφ direction; (c) at ω t   =     180 ° , the total magnetic-field vectors of the four photons are again along the ± z axis, and pairwise cancel to zero; (d) at ω t   =   270 ° , the total magnetic-field vectors of the four photons are all along the eφ direction. The cycle starts again. The photon differential volumes a’–d’ in Figure 8 only correspond to here (b).
Figure 9. The evolution of the electric- and magnetic-field vectors from four photons (H1E1, H2E2, H3E3, H4E4) in each dV of the SWM4-P composite over a period (displayed in the cylindrical surface (φ, z)). (a) At ω t   =   0 ° , the total magnetic-field vectors of the four photons are along the ± z axis, and pairwise cancel to zero; (b) at ω t   =   90 ° , the total magnetic-field vectors of the four photons are all along the -eφ direction; (c) at ω t   =     180 ° , the total magnetic-field vectors of the four photons are again along the ± z axis, and pairwise cancel to zero; (d) at ω t   =   270 ° , the total magnetic-field vectors of the four photons are all along the eφ direction. The cycle starts again. The photon differential volumes a’–d’ in Figure 8 only correspond to here (b).
Photonics 12 00841 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zu, D. Standing Wave Photon Structures in Constraint Spaces. Photonics 2025, 12, 841. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12090841

AMA Style

Zu D. Standing Wave Photon Structures in Constraint Spaces. Photonics. 2025; 12(9):841. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12090841

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zu, Donglin. 2025. "Standing Wave Photon Structures in Constraint Spaces" Photonics 12, no. 9: 841. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12090841

APA Style

Zu, D. (2025). Standing Wave Photon Structures in Constraint Spaces. Photonics, 12(9), 841. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12090841

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop