Next Article in Journal
Full-Vectorial Fiber Mode Solver Based on a Discrete Hankel Transform
Next Article in Special Issue
A Preliminary Assessment of an FBG-Based Hard Landing Monitoring System
Previous Article in Journal
An Ultra-Compact Design of Plasmonic Memristor with Low Loss and High Extinction Efficiency Based on Enhanced Interaction between Filament and Concentrated Plasmon
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dual-Modality Imaging Microfluidic Cytometer for Onsite Detection of Phytoplankton
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Highly Sensitive Biosensor Based on Partially Immobilized Silver Nanopillars in the Terahertz Band

1
Center for Advanced Laser Technology, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China
2
Hebei Key Laboratory of Advanced Laser Technology and Equipment, Tianjin 300401, China
3
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Electronic Materials and Devices, Tianjin 300401, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Photonics 2021, 8(10), 438; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8100438
Submission received: 24 August 2021 / Revised: 10 October 2021 / Accepted: 12 October 2021 / Published: 13 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optical Sensing)

Abstract

:
In this paper, a highly sensitive biosensor based on partially immobilized silver nanopillars is proposed. The working frequency of this sensor is in the terahertz band, and the range of the detected refractive index is 1.33 to 1.38. We set air holes of two different sizes on the cross-section of the optical fiber and arranged them into a hexagon. In order to improve the sensitivity, silver nanopillars were immobilized on part of the surface of the fiber cladding. The method for detecting the change of refractive index of the bio-analyte was based on local surface plasmon resonance properties of noble metal. The research recorded valuable data about the values of loss peak and full width at half maximum as well as resonance frequency shift under different setting conditions. The data present the biosensor’s final sensitivity as 1.749 THz/RIU.

1. Introduction

In the past few decades, due to high performance and simple manufacturing steps of photonic sensors, people have displayed increasing interest in photonic sense solutions [1,2,3,4]. Recently, optical technology was developed, which improves the detection limit as well as the sensitivity and the selectivity of biosensors. In the past decades, a variety of optical biosensor methods were developed, including surface plasmon resonance (SPR) [5,6], quartz crystal microbalance [7,8], and ellipsometer [9]. Zhang et al. proposed a dual-channel microfluidic sensor based on a side-hole fiber with the advantage of system integration [10]. Yin et al. proposed an optical fiber sensor-integrated microfluidic chip for ultrasensitive detection of glucose, and the performances in response time and detection range were significantly improved [11]. The integrated solution provides high sensitivity in a small footprint, paving the way for detection and collection of individual particles. Lab-on-a-chip (LOC) is miniaturized integrated equipment that has significant advantages over standard biological detection methods [12]. At the same time, the photonic biosensor has the characteristics of high sensitivity, label-free, and real-time detection, which can meet the “on-chip” detection requirements of an LOC platform. Zinoviev et al. demonstrated the performance of an interferometric device based on integrated bimodal waveguides, which could be further integrated in complete LOC platforms for point-of-care diagnostics [13]. Conteduca et al. proposed an optical tweezer based on photonic crystal cavities for the trapping of individual bacteria, which could achieve analysis and monitoring of susceptibility at the single bacterium level [14]. Dielectric metasurfaces also would be applied in this respect [15]. In general, the fiber-based approach has the advantages of small size, lightweight, anti-electromagnetic interference, in-situ monitoring, etc. In addition, the sensitivity of photonic crystal fiber (PCF) can be improved by optimizing the crystal structure (such as gap and hole size).
Optical fiber biosensors based on SPR are most popular for researchers. They have the characteristics of high precision and real-time analysis [16]. They show impressive commercial value in chemistry, life science, and other fields. Wang et al. proposed a highly sensitive optical fiber SPR biosensor with tilted fiber Bragg grating for the detection of human immunoglobulin [17]. Moreno et al. presented a hybrid tilted fiber grating based on SPR for hemoglobin detection [18]. Wu et al. proposed an SPR biosensor scheme based on air/MoS2/Al/MoS2-graphene hybrid structure, and the maximum sensitivity was −190.83°/RIU [19]. Wang et al. proposed an SPR biosensor for specific detection of C-reactive protein (CRP) [20]. Aray et al. proposed a plastic optical fiber biosensor based on SPR for the detection of CRP in serum [21]. Dash et al. proposed a biosensor based on PCF made of polymethyl methacrylate using SPR; the refractive index (RI) sensitivity was 2000 nm/RIU [22]. Wu et al. described an ultrasensitive SPR biosensor for detecting carcinoembryonic antigen [23]. Therefore, the SPR biosensor is widely used in the detection of biomarkers worldwide as a reliable, rapid, and accurate analysis method.
A terahertz (THz) band is between infrared and millimeter wave, which is widely used in scientific research, biomedical purposes, and national defense security [24]. The THz band biosensor is sensitive to the local enhancement of electromagnetic fields and the dielectric properties of the surrounding environment at fixed analyte thickness, which can be used for label-free biological detection [25,26,27]. Mou et al. introduced a THz band PCF for environmental pollutants detection showing the identification of evanescent substances with high sensitivity, and the detection rate of analytes for different applications was 89%~91.5% [28]. Rahman et al. proposed an octagonal-shaped hollow core with eight head star cladding structured PCF sensors for cholesterol detection in human blood and liquid foodstuffs; it showed a sensitivity distribution of 98.75% at 2.2 THz [29]. Zhang et al. reported a metamaterial-based THz biosensor for label-free measurements on cell apoptosis [30]. Sultana et al. proposed a novel Zeonex-based PCF for ethanol detection in the THz frequency range [31].
It is a trend to use metal film coating technology to stimulate SPR to manufacture PCF sensors. When plasma-active metal layers are combined with this structure, their sensing capabilities reach a new height. In 2014, Biswas et al. reported a hollow-core PCF with embedded silver wires for measurement of biofluid. This sensor showed a sensitivity of 2151 nm/RIU for analytes having an RI lower than 1.26 [32]. Klantsataya et al. reported an exposed core microstructure optical fiber with silver film, which achieved an RI sensitivity of 1800 nm/RIU in the sensing range of an aqueous environment (1.33–1.37) suitable for biosensing applications [33]. Zhao et al. demonstrated an SPR refraction sensor based on a side-polished single-mode fiber coated with thin silver film on the flat surface of the optical fiber. It showed a maximum sensitivity of 4365.5 nm/RIU [34]. Abdullah et al. proposed a high sensitivity gold coated circular nano-film PCF biosensor showing the maximum sensitivity response of 45,003.05 nm/RIU for the operated analyte of 1.33–1.40 [35]. To meet the requirements for high throughput and label-free analysis in the diagnostics, optical fiber nano-biosensors using metal nanoparticles to monitor the biomolecular parameters with plentiful sensing performances have been in development for decades [36]. The localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) technology has the advantages of enhanced robust sensing and high sensitivity, thereby providing better performance than commercial SPR technology [37]. Sharma et al. presented an LSPR-based biosensor containing gold nanopillar (AuNPL) on an optical fiber substrate to detect glutamate concentrations, and the biosensor achieved a sensitivity of 0.0048 AU/mM [38]. Kumar et al. developed a tapered optical fiber-based sensor probe using AuNPs and cholesterol oxidase to improve sensor sensitivity and selectivity, which showed a sensitivity of 0.125%/mM [39]. Jin et al. presented an LSPR-based biosensor chip and optical fiber of immobilizing AuNPLs onto the surface of polymer substrates [40]. The silver nanopillar (AgNPL) is also one of the best plasma candidates for LSPR-based nano-biosensors that have been used to detect a variety of analytes, including enzymes, chemicals, and metal ions [41]. Agrawal et al. proposed an optical fiber sensor fabricated and immobilized with AgNPLs and functionalized with polyethylene glycol to detect dopamine [42]. Wang et al. developed an AgNPL-based SPR biosensor for sensitive detection of microRNA without the biomodification on amplification tags [43]. Compared with metal film, optical fiber immobilized with metal nanoparticle is more sensitive in detecting small changes in RI.
In this study, we characterized a THz optical fiber biosensor partially immobilized with AgNPLs based on SPR. Through the extrusion of the large air holes on both sides of the fiber core, the energy was more easily transferred to the periphery of AgNPLs, resulting in an SPR effect. In order to find the best structural conditions with high relative sensitivity and ease of measure, we changed the size of the air holes on cladding and the size of the AgNPLs.

2. Structural Design and Materials

Figure 1 shows the cross-section of the highly sensitive biosensor based on partially immobilized AgNPLs on the cladding surface. The cross-section of the biosensor is revealed in Figure 1a. The cladding material was polycarbonate (PC) (the RI is 1.66), which allowed light in the THz band to pass through [44]. In the figure, the purplish areas refer to small air holes, and the green areas refer to large air holes. They wware regularly distributed in two layers in a hexagonal shape. As shown in Figure 1a, the outer layer is composed of eleven small air holes with a radius of r1, and an air hole near the silver layer (yellow part) was deleted. Compared to existing the air hole, deleting allowed the energy of the core to more fully contact the AgNPLs without hindrance, achieving a stronger SPR effect. The inner layer was composed of four small air holes and two large air holes with r2, and the two large air holes were symmetrically distributed on the horizontal center of the entire fiber section. The spacing of all air holes was Λ = 65 μm. The radius of cladding R = 320 μm, and the yellow area on the cladding surface represents AgNPLs, whose local enlarged view is shown in Figure 1b. The AgNPLs were immobilized neatly on one-sixth of the surface of the fiber cladding, which was close to the deleted air hole, and the distance between a single AgNPL could not exceed 1 μm. Extending from the surface of the cladding was the analyte layer (50 μm) and the perfectly matched layer (50 μm) in turn. They are represented by the cyan area and the blue area, respectively. The permittivity of Ag refers to Drude model dielectric function [45]:
ε Drude = 1 ω P ω 2 j ω τ ω
where ωp is the plasma frequency and ωτ is the damping frequency. As for silver, ωp = 1.37 × 1016 (rad/s) and ωτ = 2.733 × 1013 (rad/s) in the THz band. The electric field energy distribution of the SPP mode is demonstrated in Figure 1c. The energy was evenly distributed around the AgNPLs. The region closer to the individual AgNPL had the higher energy on account of SPR properties of noble metal nanoparticles.
The PC is an engineering plastic with excellent transparency and impact strength. The main advantage of using this material for optical fiber manufacturing lies in the well-balanced combination of optical and mechanical properties. Fasano et al. used the PC to make a solid-core microstructure polymer optical fiber with a final fiber diameter of approximately 150 μm and a core diameter of 7 μm [46]. Dadabayev et al. proposed an RGB demultiplexer based on the PC multicore polymer optical fiber structure [47]. The manufacturing process of the optical fiber needs two steps. The first step is to use plastic pellets to cast solid PC rods. When casting solid rods, the PC pellets need to be dried before casting. Bubble formation needs to be avoided, otherwise it increases transmission loss and reduces the mechanical properties of the final fiber. The second step is to use drilling and drawing techniques to manufacture PCF. When the solid rod is machined, the required hole pattern is drilled in it, and the hole pattern is composed of two types of air holes. The preform is finally drawn into a middle cane, which is then sheathed with an internally manufactured PC tube and drawn into fibers.
There are many examples of immobilizing silver on plastic optical fiber (POF). Sultangazin et al. fabricated a POF sensor for hydrogen sulfide detection through silver deposition on the POF outer surface [48]. Grassini et al. described a POF sensor suitable for measuring low concentrations of pollutants in the atmosphere, and silver was deposited on POF by direct current sputtering [49]. Shobin et al. coated silver nanowires on PMMA fibers using dip coating technique [50]. In this work, AgNPLs could be immobilized on the surface of optical fiber cladding by means of the dip coating technique.
The measurable RI range of the analyte is from 1.33 to 1.38 because the RI of most biomolecular materials, such as cypton, plasma, and hemoglobin, is between 1.33 and 1.38 [51]. Nano-silver can bind with some biomolecules such as hemoglobin, and the binding affinity between nano-silver and hemoglobin increases with the increase of temperature (from room temperature to 42 °C) [52], thus the sensor has a stronger detection ability for sulfur-containing proteins. Liu et al. proposed a THz SPR biosensor for detecting blood components. Its sensitivity is linear in the RI range of 1.33–1.38 [53]. Arunkumar et al. used a second dimension photonic crystal based biosensor to detect the RIs of cypton, blood plasma, and hemoglobin, which were 1.34, 1.35, and 1.38, respectively [54]. The proposed biosensor can detect analytes repeatedly. After a biomolecular detection, the biosensor is cleaned with deionized water to remove the bound biomolecular and then rinsed with phosphate buffered saline before starting of next measurement [55]. The next section explores the influence of different structure parameters on the location and the value of loss peak. Parameters to be changed were the radius of big air holes, the radius of small air holes, and the radius of the AgNPLs. We calculated the loss peaks of the PCF fundamental mode at the analyte RIs of 1.33 and 1.38 under different values of each parameter.

3. Optimization Process

Initially, we set the parameters of the biosensor structure to r1 = 60 μm, RAg = 100 nm, r2 = 40 μm. Then, we changed the parameter values in the order of r1, RAg, and r2 and got the optimal value under each parameter condition in turn. In the optimization process, we used the finite element method to solve the model.
Firstly, we changed the value of parameter r1, selected the big air hole radius r1s as 55 μm, 60 μm, 65 μm, and 70 μm for analysis, while other structure parameters of the optical fiber sensor remained unchanged. As Figure 2a shows, when the RI of bioanalyte was 1.33, the resonance frequencies of the biosensor were respectively 1.141 THz, 1.199 THz, 1.255 THz, and 1.327 THz; correspondingly, the maximum losses were 1088.09 dB/m, 755.27 dB/m, 592.88 dB/m, and 487.81 dB/m. When the RI of bioanalyte was 1.38, the resonance frequencies were 1.24 THz, 1.3 THz, 1.369 THz, and 1.452 THz, and the maximum losses were 614.23 dB/m, 476.08 dB/m, 384.79 dB/m, and 333.60 dB/m. The resonance frequency shifts corresponding to two RIs of analyte were 0.099 THz, 0.101 THz, 0.114 THz, and 0.125 THz. The results in Figure 2b showed that the larger r1 was, the greater was the deviation of its resonance frequency. However, as the air hole became larger, the loss peak value gradually decreased, and full width at half maximum (FWHM) of loss curves was wider in the RIs of bioanalyte of 1.33 to 1.38. It had the maximum shift but unsuitable FWHM and loss peak when r1 = 70 μm. Taking into consideration the loss peak and the FWHM, we chose the parameter r1 = 55 μm with suitable resonance frequency shift for the largest loss peak value and the narrowest FWHM.
Under the condition of r1 = 55 μm, we optimized the radius of AgNPLs as given by RAg. Then, we selected RAgs as 80 nm, 90 nm, 100 nm, and 110 nm to calculate the fundamental loss at two different RIs of bioanalyte. In Figure 3a, as RAg increased, the resonance frequency shifts corresponding to RIs of two analytes were almost the same, while the value of loss peak was increasing. As the results in Figure 3b show, there were maximum loss peaks of 1535.53 dB/m and 768.99 dB/m in the RIs of both 1.33 and 1.38 when RAg = 110 nm. For RAg = 80 nm, the corresponding two loss values were 651.34 dB/m and 432.23 dB/m. When RAg = 110 nm, the FWHM was the narrowest, but the loss peak attenuation was too large between the two different RIs, thus we did not make this value the first choice. Considering the above three aspects comprehensively, we chose 100 nm as the optimal radius of AgNPLs because of its high loss peak, narrow FWHM, and obvious resonance frequency shift.
Based on the above two optimized parameters, we carried out the following optimization process to get the most suitable small air hole size. r2s were set as 35 μm, 40 μm, 45 μm, and 50 μm. The calculation results were illustrated in Figure 4. As we can see from Figure 4a, the influence of changing r2 on the loss peak was not as great as r1 and RAg. Figure 4b illustrates some concrete data showing the RI of bioanalyte was 1.33, the FWHM values were 0.12 THz, 0.09 THz, 0.06 THz, and 0.045 THz, which correspondingly were 0.175 THz, 0.2 THz, 0.13 THz, and 0.1 THz when the RI of bioanalyte was 1.38. The optical fiber had the largest loss peak and the narrowest FWHM with r2 = 50 μm, while that with r2 = 35 μm was the opposite, thus we choose the best value from 45 μm and 50 μm. As r2 increased, the position of the loss peak moved to a lower frequency band. When r2 = 45 μm and 50 μm, the shifts of the resonance frequency were 0.085 THz and 0.075 THz, respectively, and were larger when r2 = 45 μm. As a result, we chose r2 = 45 μm as the optimal value.

4. Sensing Analysis

Finally, we chose r1 = 55 μm, RAg = 100 nm, and r2 = 45 μm as the optimal biosensor structure. Then, we selected six values at equal intervals from 1.33 to 1.38 as the RIs of bioanalyte and calculated the loss under different RIs. The results were shown in Figure 5. When the RI of bioanalyte increased, the resonance frequency of the fiber moved to a larger frequency band. Observing the graph, we can find that the value of the loss peak became smaller, from 1011.89 dB/m to 615.99 dB/m.
Figure 6 shows the RI curve of PCF. We fabricated a device based on the optimized fiber structure and tested bioanalyte with different RIs. When the bioanalyte RI was in the range of 1.33 to 1.38, the shift of the resonance frequency was in the range of 1.099 THz to 1.186 THz. As a result, the sensitivity of this biosensor was 1.749 THz/RIU (corresponding to 230,164 nm/RIU). Compared with current biosensors of the same type, it shows great advantages in terms of high sensitivity. Figure 6 represents that there is strong linearity between the RI and the resonance frequency when the RI of the bioanalyte was between 1.33 and 1.38. The fitted curve expression is:
y = 1.749 x 1.228
Furthermore, there were small residual errors between the experimental values and the fitting values. Therefore, the fitted curve matches the experimental trend well.
Table 1 presents the respective comparison of the proposed biosensor to the representative biosensor based on SPR and integrated biosensors reported previously. According to the table, the wavelength sensitivity of biosensor using silver to excite SPR effect was higher than that using gold. Furthermore, the biosensors with SPR excited by metal nanoparticles had a better performance than those excited by metal film. The proposed sensor used AgNPLs as the excitation material, and the wavelength sensitivity was 230,164 nm/RIU, which is far better than previous sensors of the same type. It proves the great superiority of AgNPLs in biological detection. However, there is no doubt that integrated biosensors are portable, easy-to-use and have great advantages in real-time detection. It will have a very positive impact on our lifestyle.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we designed and studied a biosensor partially immobilized with AgNPLs on the surface of optical fiber cladding, which can be used to detect most biomolecular solutions in the THz range. The sensitivity of the proposed PCF was evaluated by using glycerol aqueous solution. The results show that the sensitivity of 1.749 THz/RIU was obtained as the bioanalyte in the refractive index range of 1.33 to 1.38. It shows the great advantages of being a partially immobilized metal particle structure. Therefore, the proposed biosensor has excellent reliability in biomedical applications with high sensitivity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.L.; software, L.L.; formal analysis, Z.B.; writing—original draft preparation, L.L. and S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Science Foundation of China grant number 61805067, 61905061; Science and Technology Research Project of Hebei Province Higher Education grant number BJ2018047; Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province grant number F2020202069.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lyu, C.; Liu, Z.; Huo, Z.; Ge, C.; Cheng, X.; Tam, H.-Y. High-sensitivity, high-spatial-resolution distributed strain sensing based on a poly(methyl methacrylate) chirped fiber Bragg grating. Photon. Res. 2020, 8, 1134–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shen, L.; Wu, H.; Zhao, C.; Shen, L.; Zhang, R.; Tong, W.; Fu, S.; Research, M.T.J.P. Distributed curvature sensing based on a bending loss-resistant ring-core fiber. Photon. Res. 2020, 8, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sun, C.T.; Wang, R.; Jin, X.R.; Wang, Z.M.; Liu, W.L.; Zhang, S.; Ma, Y.W.; Lin, J.Y.; Li, Y.; Geng, T.; et al. A new phase-shifted long-period fiber grating for simultaneous measurement of torsion and temperature. Chin. Opt. Lett. 2020, 18, 021203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cao, L.; Yu, Y.; Xiao, M.; Yang, J.B.; Zhang, X.L.; Meng, Z. High sensitivity conductivity-temperature-depth sensing based on an optical microfiber coupler combined fiber loop. Chin. Opt. Lett. 2020, 18, 011202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhou, J.; Qi, Q.; Wang, C.; Qian, Y.; Liu, G.; Wang, Y.; Fu, L. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensors for food allergen detection in food matrices. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 142, 111449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Falkowski, P.; Lukaszewski, Z.; Gorodkiewicz, E. Potential of surface plasmon resonance biosensors in cancer detection. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2021, 194, 113802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Saad, N.A.; Zaaba, S.K.; Zakaria, A.; Kamarudin, L.M.; Wan, K.; Shariman, A.B. Quartz crystal microbalance for bacteria application review. In Proceedings of the 2014 2nd International Conference on Electronic Design (ICED), Penang, Malaysia, 19–21 August 2014; pp. 455–460. [Google Scholar]
  8. Atashbar, M.Z.; Bejcek, B.; Vijh, A.; Singamaneni, S. QCM biosensor with ultra thin polymer film. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2005, 107, 945–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Arwin, H. Spectroscopic ellipsometry and biology: Recent developments and challenges. Thin Solid Film. 1998, 313–314, 764–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.Z.; Liu, C.; Liu, Z.H.; Zhang, Y.X.; Yang, X.H.; Zhang, J.Z.; Yang, J.; Yuan, L.B. Dual-channel microfluidic sensor based on side-hole fiber with two long-period fiber gratings. Chin. Opt. Lett. 2020, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yin, M.-J.; Huang, B.; Gao, S.; Zhang, A.P.; Ye, X. Optical fiber LPG biosensor integrated microfluidic chip for ultrasensitive glucose detection. Biomed. Opt. Express 2016, 7, 2067–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Estevez, M.C.; Alvarez, M.; Lechuga, L.M. Integrated optical devices for lab-on-a-chip biosensing applications. Laser Photonics Rev. 2012, 6, 463–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Zinoviev, K.E.; Gonzalez-Guerrero, A.B.; Dominguez, C.; Lechuga, L.M. Integrated bimodal waveguide interferometric biosensor for label-free analysis. J. Lightwave Technol. 2011, 29, 1926–1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Conteduca, D.; Brunetti, G.; Dell’Olio, F.; Armenise, M.N.; Krauss, T.F.; Ciminelli, C. Monitoring of individual bacteria using electro-photonic traps. Biomed. Opt. Express 2019, 10, 3463–3471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Algorri, J.F.; Zografopoulos, D.C.; Ferraro, A.; García-Cámara, B.; Beccherelli, R.; Sánchez-Pena, J.M. Ultrahigh-quality factor resonant dielectric metasurfaces based on hollow nanocuboids. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 6320–6330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Singh, P. SPR biosensors: Historical perspectives and current challenges. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 229, 110–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, Q.; Jing, J.; Wang, B. Highly sensitive SPR biosensor based on graphene oxide and staphylococcal protein a Co-Modified TFBG for human IgG detection. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2019, 68, 3350–3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Moreno, Y.; Song, Q.; Xing, Z.; Sun, Y.; Letters, Z.Y.J.C.O. Hybrid tilted fiber gratings-based surface plasmon resonance sensor and its application for hemoglobin detection. Chin. Opt. Lett. 2020, 18, 100601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wu, L.; Jia, Y.; Jiang, L.; Guo, J.; Dai, X.; Xiang, Y.; Fan, D. Sensitivity improved SPR biosensor based on the MoS2/graphene–aluminum hybrid structure. J. Lightwave Technol. 2017, 35, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, W.; Mai, Z.; Chen, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, L.; Su, Q.; Li, X.; Hong, X. A label-free fiber optic SPR biosensor for specific detection of C-reactive protein. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Aray, A.; Chiavaioli, F.; Arjmand, M.; Trono, C.; Tombelli, S.; Giannetti, A.; Cennamo, N.; Soltanolkotabi, M.; Zeni, L.; Baldini, F. SPR-based plastic optical fibre biosensor for the detection of C-reactive protein in serum. J. Biophotonics 2016, 9, 1077–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dash, J.N.; Jha, R. SPR biosensor based on polymer PCF coated with conducting metal oxide. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2014, 26, 595–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wu, Q.; Li, N.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xu, Y.; Wei, S.; Wu, J.; Jia, G.; Fang, X.; Chen, F.; et al. A 2D transition metal carbide MXene-based SPR biosensor for ultrasensitive carcinoembryonic antigen detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 144, 111697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Menikh, A.; MacColl, R.; Mannella, C.A.; Zhang, X.-C. Terahertz biosensing technology: Frontiers and progress. ChemPhysChem 2002, 3, 655–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Markelz, A.G. Terahertz dielectric sensitivity to biomolecular structure and function. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2008, 14, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, D.K.; Kim, G.; Kim, C.; Jhon, Y.M.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, T.; Son, J.H.; Seo, M. Ultrasensitive detection of residual pesticides using THz near-field enhancement. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Saadeldin, A.S.; Hameed, M.F.O.; Elkaramany, E.M.A.; Obayya, S.S.A. Highly sensitive terahertz metamaterial sensor. IEEE Sens. J. 2019, 19, 7993–7999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mou, F.A.; Rahman, M.M.; Islam, M.R.; Bhuiyan, M.I.H. Development of a photonic crystal fiber for THz wave guidance and environmental pollutants detection. Sens. Bio-Sens. Res. 2020, 29, 100346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rahman, M.M.; Mou, F.A.; Bhuiyan, M.I.H.; Islam, M.R. Photonic crystal fiber based terahertz sensor for cholesterol detection in human blood and liquid foodstuffs. Sens. Bio-Sens. Res. 2020, 29, 100356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, C.; Liang, L.; Ding, L.; Jin, B.; Hou, Y.; Li, C.; Jiang, L.; Liu, W.; Hu, W.; Lu, Y.; et al. Label-free measurements on cell apoptosis using a terahertz metamaterial-based biosensor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 108, 241105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sultana, J.; Islam, M.S.; Ahmed, K.; Dinovitser, A.; Ng, B.W.H.; Abbott, D. Terahertz detection of alcohol using a photonic crystal fiber sensor. Appl. Opt. 2018, 57, 2426–2433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Biswas, T.; Chattopadhyay, R.; Bhadra, S.K. Plasmonic hollow-core photonic band gap fiber for efficient sensing of biofluids. J. Opt. 2014, 16, 045001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Klantsataya, E.; François, A.; Ebendorff-Heidepriem, H.; Hoffmann, P.; Monro, T.M. Surface plasmon scattering in exposed core optical fiber for enhanced resolution refractive index sensing. Sensors 2015, 15, 25090–25102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Zhao, J.; Cao, S.; Liao, C.; Wang, Y.; Wang, G.; Xu, X.; Fu, C.; Xu, G.; Lian, J.; Wang, Y. Surface plasmon resonance refractive sensor based on silver-coated side-polished fiber. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 230, 206–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Abdullah, H.; Ahmed, K.; Mitu, S.A. Ultrahigh sensitivity refractive index biosensor based on gold coated nano-film photonic crystal fiber. Results Phys. 2020, 17, 103151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jeong, H.-H.; Erdene, N.; Park, J.-H.; Jeong, D.-H.; Lee, H.-Y.; Lee, S.-K. Real-time label-free immunoassay of interferon-gamma and prostate-specific antigen using a Fiber-Optic Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance sensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 39, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Unser, S.; Bruzas, I.; He, J.; Sagle, L. Localized surface plasmon resonance biosensing: Current challenges and approaches. Sensors 2015, 15, 15684–15716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Sharma, P.; Semwal, V.; Gupta, B.D. Highly sensitive and selective localized surface plasmon resonance biosensor for detecting glutamate realized on optical fiber substrate using gold nanoparticles. Photonics Nanostruct.—Fundam. Appl. 2019, 37, 100730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kumar, S.; Kaushik, B.K.; Singh, R.; Chen, N.-K.; Yang, Q.S.; Zhang, X.; Wang, W.; Zhang, B. LSPR-based cholesterol biosensor using a tapered optical fiber structure. Biomed. Opt. Express 2019, 10, 2150–2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jin, Y.; Wong, K.H.; Granville, A.M. Developing localized surface plasmon resonance biosensor chips and fiber optics via direct surface modification of PMMA optical waveguides. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2016, 492, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Amirjani, A.; Haghshenas, D.F. Ag nanostructures as the surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-based sensors: A mechanistic study with an emphasis on heavy metallic ions detection. Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 2018, 273, 1768–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Agrawal, N.; Zhang, B.; Saha, C.; Kumar, C.; Kaushik, B.K.; Kumar, S. Development of dopamine sensor using silver nanoparticles and PEG-functionalized tapered optical fiber structure. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2020, 67, 1542–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, X.; Hou, T.; Lin, H.; Lv, W.; Li, H.; Li, F. In situ template generation of silver nanoparticles as amplification tags for ultrasensitive surface plasmon resonance biosensing of microRNA. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 137, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Piesiewicz, R.; Jansen, C.; Wietzke, S.; Mittleman, D.; Koch, M.; Kürner, T.J.I.J.o.I.; Waves, M. Properties of building and plastic materials in the THz range. Int. J. Infrared Millim. Waves 2007, 28, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hosseininejad, S.E.; Komjani, N. Waveguide-fed tunable terahertz antenna based on hybrid graphene-metal structure. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2016, 64, 3787–3793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fasano, A.; Woyessa, G.; Stajanca, P.; Markos, C.; Stefani, A.; Nielsen, K.; Rasmussen, H.K.; Krebber, K.; Bang, O. Fabrication and characterization of polycarbonate microstructured polymer optical fibers for high-temperature-resistant fiber Bragg grating strain sensors. Opt. Mater. Express 2016, 6, 649–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Dadabayev, R.; Malka, D. A visible light RGB wavelength demultiplexer based on polycarbonate multicore polymer optical fiber. Opt. Laser Technol. 2019, 116, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sultangazin, A.; Kusmangaliyev, J.; Aitkulov, A.; Akilbekova, D.; Olivero, M.; Tosi, D. Design of a smartphone plastic optical fiber chemical sensor for hydrogen sulfide detection. IEEE Sens. J. 2017, 17, 6935–6940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Grassini, S.; Ishtaiwi, M.; Parvis, M.; Vallan, A. Design and deployment of low-cost plastic optical fiber sensors for gas monitoring. Sensors 2015, 15, 485–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shobin, L.R.; Sastikumar, D.; Manivannan, S. Glycerol mediated synthesis of silver nanowires for room temperature ammonia vapor sensing. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2014, 214, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yaşlı, A.; Ademgil, H. Modeling the photonic crystal fiber based surface plazmon resonance biosensor to detect blood components. In Proceedings of the 2021 29th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU), Istanbul, Turkey, 9–11 June 2021; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  52. Zolghadri, S.; Saboury, A.A.; Golestani, A.; Divsalar, A.; Rezaei-Zarchi, S.; Moosavi-Movahedi, A.A. Interaction between silver nanoparticle and bovine hemoglobin at different temperatures. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2008, 11, 1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, S.; Ma, R.; Li, Y.; Zhao, L.; Xia, Y.; Dong, X.; Pang, Y. D-shaped surface plasmon resonance biosensor based on MoS2 in terahertz band. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2021, 66, 102631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Arunkumar, R.; Suaganya, T.; Robinson, S.J.P.S. Design and analysis of 2D photonic crystal based biosensor to detect different blood components. Photonic Sens. 2019, 9, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sridevi, S.; Vasu, K.S.; Sampath, S.; Asokan, S.; Sood, A.K. Optical detection of glucose and glycated hemoglobin using etched fiber Bragg gratings coated with functionalized reduced graphene oxide. J. Biophotonics 2016, 9, 760–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Hasan, M.R.; Akter, S.; Rifat, A.A.; Rana, S.; Ali, S. A highly sensitive gold-coated photonic crystal fiber biosensor based on surface plasmon resonance. Photonics 2017, 4, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tong, K.; Wang, F.; Wang, M.; Dang, P.; Wang, Y. Three-core photonic crystal fiber surface plasmon resonance sensor. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2018, 46, 306–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, B.; Wang, Q. Sensitivity-enhanced optical fiber biosensor based on coupling effect between SPR and LSPR. IEEE Sens. J. 2018, 18, 8303–8310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Shengxi, J.; Sanfeng, G.; Hanrui, Y.; Hairui, F. Research on dual-core photonic crystal fiber based on local surface plasmon resonance sensor with silver nanowires. J. Nanophotonics 2018, 12, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Samusenko, A.; Gandolfi, D.; Pucker, G.; Chalyan, T.; Guider, R.; Ghulinyan, M.; Pavesi, L. A SiON microring resonator-based platform for biosensing at 850 nm. J. Lightwave Technol. 2016, 34, 969–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tsai, M.-Z.; Hsiung, C.-T.; Chen, Y.; Huang, C.-S.; Hsu, H.-Y.; Hsieh, P.-Y. Real-time CRP detection from whole blood using micropost-embedded microfluidic chip incorporated with label-free biosensor. Analyst 2018, 143, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) The cross-section of PCF, (b) the schematic diagram of AgNPLs, (c) SPP mode.
Figure 1. (a) The cross-section of PCF, (b) the schematic diagram of AgNPLs, (c) SPP mode.
Photonics 08 00438 g001
Figure 2. (a) Loss peak curves of different r1, solid line (the RI of bioanalyte is 1.33) and dashed line (the RI of bioanalyte is 1.38). (b) FWHM and loss of different r1.
Figure 2. (a) Loss peak curves of different r1, solid line (the RI of bioanalyte is 1.33) and dashed line (the RI of bioanalyte is 1.38). (b) FWHM and loss of different r1.
Photonics 08 00438 g002
Figure 3. (a) Loss peak curves of different RAg. (b) FWHM and loss of different RAg.
Figure 3. (a) Loss peak curves of different RAg. (b) FWHM and loss of different RAg.
Photonics 08 00438 g003
Figure 4. (a) Loss peak curves of different r2. (b) FWHM and resonance frequency shift of different r2.
Figure 4. (a) Loss peak curves of different r2. (b) FWHM and resonance frequency shift of different r2.
Photonics 08 00438 g004
Figure 5. Loss peak curves with different RI of bioanalyte.
Figure 5. Loss peak curves with different RI of bioanalyte.
Photonics 08 00438 g005
Figure 6. Variation of resonance frequency with different RIs of bioanalyte.
Figure 6. Variation of resonance frequency with different RIs of bioanalyte.
Photonics 08 00438 g006
Table 1. Comparison table of the performance of the proposed biosensor and other counterparts reported in literature.
Table 1. Comparison table of the performance of the proposed biosensor and other counterparts reported in literature.
Sensor Configuration/Materials CoatingType of ExcitationSensitivityWorking BandRef
PCF/gold filmSPR2200 nm/RIU0.6–0.652 μm[56]
PCF/gold filmSPR3435 nm/RIU575–815 nm[57]
PCF/gold nanoparticlesLSPR3915 nm/RIU656–813 nm[58]
SP-SMF/silver filmSPR4365.5 nm/RIU508–731 nm[34]
PCF/silver nanowiresLSPR9000 nm/RIU599–768 nm[59]
Microring resonator/80 nm/RIU~850 nm[60]
GMR sensor/186 nm /RIU841–863 nm[61]
This paperLSPR230,164 nm/RIU253–273 μm
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, S.; Li, L.; Bai, Z. Highly Sensitive Biosensor Based on Partially Immobilized Silver Nanopillars in the Terahertz Band. Photonics 2021, 8, 438. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8100438

AMA Style

Liu S, Li L, Bai Z. Highly Sensitive Biosensor Based on Partially Immobilized Silver Nanopillars in the Terahertz Band. Photonics. 2021; 8(10):438. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8100438

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Shuo, Lin Li, and Zhenxu Bai. 2021. "Highly Sensitive Biosensor Based on Partially Immobilized Silver Nanopillars in the Terahertz Band" Photonics 8, no. 10: 438. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8100438

APA Style

Liu, S., Li, L., & Bai, Z. (2021). Highly Sensitive Biosensor Based on Partially Immobilized Silver Nanopillars in the Terahertz Band. Photonics, 8(10), 438. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8100438

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop