Examination of Logistics Simulation Demand Related to Enterprises: Focusing on a Hungarian County
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- How satisfied are the enterprises with their logistics processes, and how often can significant delays be experienced within the current (classical) intra-company logistics processes?
- What direct and indirect effects do the financial, market, and logistics system features of companies have on the way that company leaders view the external and internal logistics process difficulties that plague their operations?
2. Literature Review
2.1. An Overview of the Logistical Challenges Present in Contemporary Supply Chains
2.2. IT Support of Logistics Systems
- Production Plan: The central program that includes the periodical production plan(s) defined by the organization. The number of pieces to be produced is determined by the company’s market forecasts and market needs.
- BOM—Bill of Materials (Installation tree)—the installation guide for the components that are required for the finished product. The BOM contains not only the order of installation of the components but also the required quantities.
- Inventory register: Shows the tracking of raw materials over time. It also includes the lead times required for material procurement as well as the production times.
3. Hypothesis Development, Sampling and Methods
- ▪
- data of the company;
- ▪
- current situation of the company;
- ▪
- problems of logistics processes;
- ▪
- problems of logistics transportation;
- ▪
- damages due to negative logistics effects;
- ▪
- logistics developments.
- ▪
- location in ZC;
- ▪
- significant material flow (min. weekly order);
- ▪
- having a logistics department at the operations level.
4. Results
4.1. Satisfaction of ZC Businesses with Their Logistics Processes
4.2. Problems of the Logistics Processes among ZC Enterprises
4.3. Mapping the Logistics Processes of ZC Enterprises
- building adequate production/service capacity—adequate infrastructure;
- supply of specialists—the existence of a sufficient number of qualified workers;
- IT supply—software support for company management is optimal.
- the current situation,
- the problem types,
- the caused damages
- and the needed developments for solving the problems.
- Companies have a given level of IT support and capacity in logistics, but they use the facilities in an inefficient way;
- This causes serious logistics problems at the system level;
- From these barriers to the everyday material flow, instant and direct operative damages are created;
- Well-prospered companies with proper planning (e.g., the PDCA approach) can handle these problems and keep the damages low.
- Despite this, these enterprises show a strong demand for planning and new approaches;
- The type of the company suffers from serious system problems and operative damages resulting from it but they do not pay attention to the planning and introduction of new tools.
5. Conclusions, Limitations and Future Research Direction
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Pató, B.S.G.; Herczeg, M. The Effect of the COVID-19 on the Automotive Supply Chains. Stud. Univ. Babes-Bolyai Oeconomica 2020, 65, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gubán, M.; Kovács, G.; Kot, S. Simulation of Complex Logistical Service Processes. Manag. Prod. Eng. Rev. 2017, 8, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szabó, L.; Szabó, K.; Gubán, M. Territorial examination of the logistics processes of enterprises. Prosperitas 2020, 7, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szabó, K.; Szabó, L. Measurement of logistics processes for potential optimization purposes at enterprises based in a Hungarian county. Prosperitas 2023, 10, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scukanec, A.; Rogic, K.; Babic, D. Bullwhip effect in supply chains. Promet-Traffic Transp. 2007, 19, 289–293. [Google Scholar]
- Moon, K.L.K.; Lee, J.Y.; Lai, S.Y.C. Key drivers of an agile, collaborative fast fashion supply chain Dongdaemun fashion market. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 2017, 21, 278–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shu, T.; Chen, S.; Lai, K.K.; Xie, C.; Wang, S.Y. A study of collaborative planning forecasting replenishment mechanism of agile virtual enterprises. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, Singapore, 21–23 June 2006; Volume 1–2. [Google Scholar]
- Arango, M.D.; Zapata, J.A. Multiobjective Model for The Simultaneous Optimization of Transportation Costs, Inventory Costs and Service Level in Goods Distribution. IEEE Lat. Am. Trans. 2017, 15, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forgerini, F.L.; de Sousa, O.F. Flow optimization process in a transportation network. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2021, 35, 2150113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szentesi, S.; Illes, B.; Cservenak, A.; Skapinyecz, R.; Tamas, P. Multi-Level Optimization Process for Rationalizing the Distribution Logistics Process of Companies Selling Dietary Supplements. Processes 2021, 9, 1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tarapata, Z.; Nowicki, T.; Antkiewicz, R.; Dudzinski, J.; Janik, K. Data-Driven Machine Learning System for Optimization of Processes Supporting the Distribution of Goods Services—A case study. Procedia Manuf. 2020, 44, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ekren, B.Y.; Stylos, N.; Zwiegelaar, J.; Kumar, V.; Turhanlar, E.E. Additive manufacturing integration in E-commerce supply chain network to improve resilience and competitiveness. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 2023, 122, 102676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.; Zhao, X.M.; Zhai, L.Y. Digital empowerment to improve the operational profitability in e-commerce supply chain. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2023, 58, 101253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sodhi, M.S.; Tang, C.S. Supply Chain Management for Extreme Conditions: Research Opportunities. J. Supply Chain. Manag. 2021, 57, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.X.; Wang, S.Z.; Su, J.F. Integrated Production and Transportation Scheduling in E-Commerce Supply Chain with Carbon Emission Constraints. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2021, 16, 2554–2570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia, D.J.; You, F.Q. Supply chain design and optimization: Challenges and opportunities. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2015, 81, 153–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kassmann, D.; Allgor, R. Supply Chain Design, Management and Optimization. Comput. Aided Chem. Eng. 2006, 21, 101–106. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, O.; Fan, N. A Review on Optimization Methods for Biomass Supply Chain: Models and Algorithms, Sustainable Issues, and Challenges and Opportunities. Process Integr. Optim. Sustain. 2020, 4, 203–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.P.; Iyengar, G.; Wang, C. Robust Inventory Management: A Cycle-Based Approach. M SOM-Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2022, 25, 371–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Moor, B.J.; Gijsbrechts, J.; Boute, R.N. Reward shaping to improve the performance of deep reinforcement learning in perishable inventory management. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2022, 301, 535–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.; Alshahrani, A.N.; Jacquemod, J. Digital Platforms and Supply Chain Traceability for Robust Information and Effective Inventory Management: The Mediating Role of Transparency. Logistics 2023, 7, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panigrahi, R.R.; Mishra, P.C.; Samantaray, A.; Jena, D. Management of inventory for firms’ efficiency—A study on steel manufacturing industry. J. Adv. Manag. Res. 2022, 19, 443–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagashima, M.; Wehrle, F.T.; Kerbache, L.; Lassagne, M. Impacts of adaptive collaboration on demand forecasting accuracy of different product categories throughout the product life cycle. Supply Chain. Manag.-Int. J. 2015, 20, 415–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yani LP, E.; Aamer, A. Demand forecasting accuracy in the pharmaceutical supply chain: A machine learning approach. Int. J. Pharm. Healthc. Mark. 2023, 17, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bandaly, D.; Satir, A.; Shanker, L. Impact of lead time variability in supply chain risk management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2016, 180, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dominguez, R.; Cannella, S.; Ponte, B.; Framinan, J.M. On the dynamics of closed-loop supply chains under remanufacturing lead time variability. Omega-Int. J. Manag. Sci. 2020, 97, 102106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, T.; Azeem, A.; Jabir, M.; Paul, A.; Paul, S.K. An inventory model for a three-stage supply chain with random capacities considering disruptions and supplier reliability. Ann. Oper. Res. 2022, 315, 1703–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kamalahmadi, M.; Mellat-Parast, M. Developing a resilient supply chain through supplier flexibility and reliability assessment. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2016, 54, 302–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Li, M.C.; Cui, N.F. Improving reliability of assembly supply chains with disruption risk: Stakeholders’ subsidy interplay. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shukla, V.; Naim, M.M. Sensing endogenous seasonality in the case of a coffee supply chain. Int. J. Logist.-Res. Appl. 2018, 21, 279–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shukla, V.; Naim, M.M.; Thornhill, N.F. Rogue seasonality detection in supply chains. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2012, 138, 254–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ganesan, S.; Wicaksono, H.; Valilai, O.F. Enhancing Vendor Managed Inventory with the Application of Blockchain Technology. In Advances in System-Integrated Intelligence, SYSINT 2022; Valle, M., Lehmhus, D., Gianoglio, C., Ragusa, E., Seminara, L., Bosse, S., Thoben, K.D., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, X.P.; Wang, C.Y.; Xu, L.; Diabat, A. Multiple-vendor, multiple-retailer based vendor-managed inventory. Ann. Oper. Res. 2016, 238, 277–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, H.J. Investing in lead-time variability reduction in a collaborative vendor-buyer supply chain model with stochastic lead time. Comput. Oper. Res. 2016, 72, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, C.L.; Wee, H.M.; Wu, S.M. Revisiting Lean Manufacturing Process with Vendor Managed Inventory System. In Proceedings of the 5th International Asia Conference on Industrial Engineering and Management Innovation (IEMI2014), Xi’an, China, 21–22 July 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guan, Z.L.; Zhang, X.M.; Zhou, M.S.; Dan, Y.R. Demand information sharing in competing supply chains with manufacturer-provided service. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 220, 107450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, T.S.; Zhou, Q. The Effect of Supply Information Sharing in a Supply Chain. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Operations and Supply Chain Management (ICOSCM 2010), Hong Kong and Guiangzhou, China, 25–31 July 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Baah, C.; Agyeman, D.O.; Acquah, I.S.K.; Agyabeng-Mensah, Y.; Afum, E.; Issau, K.; Ofori, D.; Faibil, D. Effect of information sharing in supply chains: Understanding the roles of supply chain visibility, agility, collaboration on supply chain performance. Benchmarking-Int. J. 2022, 29, 434–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manavalan, E.; Jayakrishna, K. A review of Internet of Things (IoT) embedded sustainable supply chain for industry 4.0 requirements. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019, 127, 925–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qureshi, M. Evaluating Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Implementation for Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Sustainability 2022, 14, 14779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsiao, S.J.; Sung, W.T. Blockchain-Based Supply Chain Information Sharing Mechanism. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 78875–78886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, X.F.; Dou, J.P.; Shang, Y. Blockchain-driven supply chain decentralized operations—Information sharing perspective. Bus. Process Manag. J. 2021, 27, 184–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bratt, C.; Sroufe, R.; Broman, G. Implementing Strategic Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nieuwenhuis, P.; Touboulic, A.; Matthews, L. Is Sustainable Supply Chain Management Sustainable? In Sustainable Development Goals and Sustainable Supply Chains in the Post-Global Economy; Yakovleva, N., Frei, R., Murthy, S.R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mridha, B.; Pareek, S.; Goswami, A.; Sarkar, B. Joint effects of production quality improvement of biofuel and carbon emissions towards a smart sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 386, 135629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkar, B.; Sarkar, M.; Ganguly, B.; Cardenas-Barron, L.E. Combined effects of carbon emission and production quality improvement for fixed lifetime products in a sustainable supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2021, 231, 107867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, D.; Kumari, R.; Kumar, N.; Sarkar, B. Reduction of waste and carbon emission through the selection of items with cross-price elasticity of demand to form a sustainable supply chain with preservation technology. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 297, 126298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalkha, H.; Khiat, A.; Bahnasse, A.; Ouajji, H. The Rising Trends of Smart E-Commerce Logistics. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 33839–33857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.L.; Zhang, X. Influence of Environmental Regulation on Corporate Green Supply Chain Management: The Regulating Effect of Environmental Dynamism. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 947022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaegler, A.; Goessling, T. Sustainability concerns in luxury supply chains: European brand strategies and French consumer expectations. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2020, 29, 2715–2733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, T.T. Linking big data, sustainable supply chain management and corporate performance: The moderating role of circular economy thinking. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2023, 34, 744–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gkountani, V.A.; Tsoulfas, G.T.; Mouzakitis, Y. Mapping sustainability assessment methods in agri-food supply chains: A circular economy perspective. Sci. Pap.-Ser. Manag. Econ. Eng. Agric. Rural. Dev. 2022, 22, 361–368. [Google Scholar]
- Shahparvari, S.; Soleimani, H.; Govindan, K.; Bodaghi, B.; Fard, M.T.; Jafari, H. Closing the loop: Redesigning sustainable reverse logistics network in uncertain supply chains. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, 157, 107093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tavana, M.; Shaabani, A.; Santos-Arteaga, F.J.; Valaei, N. An integrated fuzzy sustainable supplier evaluation and selection framework for green supply chains in reverse logistics. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 53953–53982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bikfalvi, P.; Dudás, L.; Hornyák, O.; Kulcsár, G.; Nehéz, K.; Tóth, T. Logisztikai Informatika; Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Goldston, J. The Evolution of ERP Systems: A Literature Review. Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. Technol. 2020, 5, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schubert, A. Az Ellátási Lánc Információs Folyamatai/Information Processes of the Supply Chain (Műhelytanulmányok No. 85); Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem: Budapest, Hungary, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Elbahri, F.M.; Ismael Al-Sanjary, O.; Ali, M.A.M.; Ali Naif, Z.; Ibrahim, O.A.; Mohammed, M.N. Difference Comparison of SAP, Oracle, and Microsoft Solutions Based on Cloud ERP Systems: A Review. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 15th International Colloquium on Signal Processing & Its Applications (CSPA), Penang, Malaysia, 8–9 March 2019; pp. 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liebetrau, F.; Mockel, A. Anomaly investigation of electric drive systems using big scattered test stand data on the example of a PMSM traction drive. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Diagnostics for Electrical Machines, Power Electronics and Drives (SDEMPED), Dallas, TX, USA, 22–25 August 2021; pp. 422–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monroy, C.; Domínguez-Martínez, E.; Taylor, B.; Marin, O.P.; Parise, E.; Reid, V.M. Understanding the causes and consequences of variability in infant ERP editing practices. Dev. Psychobiol. 2021, 63, e22217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wilson, M.; Paschen, J.; Pitt, L. The circular economy meets artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the opportunities of AI for reverse logistics. Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J. 2022, 33, 9–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yathiraju, N. Investigating the use of an Artificial Intelligence Model in an ERP Cloud-Based System. Int. J. Electr. Electron. Comput. 2022, 7, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bohács, G.; Kovács, G.; Rinkács, A. Production Logistics Simulation Supported by Process Description Languages. Manag. Prod. Eng. Rev. 2016, 7, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fehér, P.; Kő, A.; Szabó, Z. Kapacitásmodellezés és az IT-architektúra-tervezés kihívásainak vizsgálata statisztikai és prediktív analitikai eszközökkel. Statisztikai Szle. 2016, 94, 1149–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trappey, A.; Trappey, C.V.; Hsieh, A. An intelligent patent recommender adopting machine learning approach for natural language processing: A case study for smart machinery technology mining. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 164, 120511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adelantado, F.; Ammouriova, M.; Herrera, E.; Juan, A.A.; Shinde, S.S.; Tarchi, D. Internet of Vehicles and Real-Time Optimization Algorithms: Concepts for Vehicle Networking in Smart Cities. Vehicles 2022, 4, 1223–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.T.; Sun, E.W.; Chang, M.F.; Lin, Y.B. Pragmatic real-time logistics management with traffic IoT infrastructure: Big data predictive analytics of freight travel time for Logistics 4.0. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2021, 238, 108157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, Y.; Ma, X.; Gao, K.; Li, Z.; Dong, H. Multi-Objective Home Health Care Routing and Scheduling with Sharing Service via a Problem-Specific Knowledge-Based Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Z.; Zhou, R.; Goh, M.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Z.; Song, W. (DT4Smart) a digital twin-based modularized design approach for smart warehouses. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2023, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szabó, K.; Szabó, L.; Csanádi, Á. Strategic analysis of Zalaegerszeg Proving Ground. J. Eng. Manag. Compet. (JEMC) 2020, 10, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewin, K. Action Research and Minority Problems. In Resolving Social Conflicts; Harper and Row: New York, NY, USA, 1946. [Google Scholar]
- Sajtos, L.; Mitev, A. SPSS Kutatási és Adatelemzési Kézikönyv; Alinea Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Freedman, D.; Pisani, R.; Purves, R. Statisztika; Typotex: Budapest, Hungary, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Snedecor, G.W.; Cochran, W.G. Statistical Methods, 8th ed.; Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Füstös, L.; Kovács, E.; Meszéna, G.; Simonné Mosolygó, N. Alakfelismerés. Sokváltozós Statisztikai Módszerek; Új Mandátum Könyvkiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- In’nami, Y.; Koizumi, R. Structural Equation Modeling in Educational Research: A Primer. In Application of Structural Equation Modeling in Educational Research and Practice; Khine, M.S., Ed.; Sense Publishers: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 23–51. [Google Scholar]
- Sebastian, N.; S. Nair, S.; P. Joseph, D. An overview of the pathway idea and its applications in statistical and physical sciences. Axioms 2015, 4, 530–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szabó, K.; Szabó, L. Possibilities of short supply chains in the sustainable logistics in Zala County. J. Eng. Manag. Compet. (JEMC) 2023, 13, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hunyadi, L.; Mundruczó, G.; Vita, L. Statisztika; Aula Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Mosteller, F.; Tukey, J.W. Data Analisys and Regression; Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
Territorial Unit Name | Territorial Unit Level | Number of Registered Businesses (pcs) |
---|---|---|
Győr-Moson-Sopron | county | 76,268 |
Vas | county | 41,396 |
Zala | county | 52,429 |
Western Transdanubia (Total) | region | 170,093 |
Groups | Factors | No. of Measured Variables | KMO | Bartlett p | TVE | Min. Factor Load |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current situation | Economic situation | 4 | 0.773 | 0.000 | 67.68 | 0.612 |
IT support and capacity | 2 | 0.817 | ||||
Logistics problems | Logistics system problems | 5 | 0.684 | 0.000 | 70.68 | 0.650 |
Administrative problems | 2 | 0.824 | ||||
Transportation problems | External environmental problems | 4 | 0.663 | 0.000 | 77.32 | 0.779 |
Border crossing problems | 2 | 0.917 | ||||
Organizational problems | 2 | 0.705 | ||||
Problems with suppliers and labor shortages | 2 | 0.688 | ||||
Damages | Operative problems | 4 | 0.840 | 0.000 | 74.45 | 0.699 |
Strategic problems | 4 | 0.633 | ||||
Developments | Planning developments | 4 | 0.703 | 0.000 | 75.14 | 0.767 |
Market developments | 3 | 0.641 | ||||
Search for new transportation routes | 1 | 0.939 |
Groups | Factors | Satisfaction with Logistics Processes | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes, Completely | Partially, Some Processes Need Improvement | Not Satisfied at All | F | Sig. | p | ||
Current situation | Economic situation | −0.141 | 0.169 | −0.665 | 6.339 | 0.002 | ** |
IT support and capacity | 0.564 | −0.083 | −0.427 | 7.254 | 0.001 | *** | |
Logistics problems | Logistics system problems | 0.983 | −0.134 | −0.804 | 29.171 | 0.000 | *** |
Administrative problems | 0.447 | −0.117 | −0.070 | 3.759 | 0.026 | * | |
Transportation problems | External environmental problems | 0.503 | −0.205 | 0.299 | 7.150 | 0.001 | ** |
Border crossing problems | 0.239 | −0.153 | 0.431 | 3.895 | 0.023 | * | |
Organizational problems | 0.174 | 0.142 | −1.005 | 12.824 | 0.000 | *** | |
Problems with suppliers and labor shortages | 0.139 | 0.003 | −0.226 | 0.764 | 0.468 | ||
Damages | Operative problems | 1.276 | −0.175 | −1.037 | 67.593 | 0.000 | *** |
Strategic problems | 0.556 | −0.160 | −0.016 | 6.156 | 0.003 | ** | |
Developments | Planning developments | −0.810 | 0.146 | 0.475 | 15.178 | 0.000 | *** |
Market developments | −0.342 | 0.021 | 0.414 | 3.458 | 0.034 | * | |
Search for new transportation routes | −0.442 | 0.008 | 0.633 | 7.209 | 0.001 | ** |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Szabó, K.; Szabó, L.; Kása, R. Examination of Logistics Simulation Demand Related to Enterprises: Focusing on a Hungarian County. Logistics 2024, 8, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics8010007
Szabó K, Szabó L, Kása R. Examination of Logistics Simulation Demand Related to Enterprises: Focusing on a Hungarian County. Logistics. 2024; 8(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics8010007
Chicago/Turabian StyleSzabó, Károly, László Szabó, and Richárd Kása. 2024. "Examination of Logistics Simulation Demand Related to Enterprises: Focusing on a Hungarian County" Logistics 8, no. 1: 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics8010007
APA StyleSzabó, K., Szabó, L., & Kása, R. (2024). Examination of Logistics Simulation Demand Related to Enterprises: Focusing on a Hungarian County. Logistics, 8(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics8010007