Next Article in Journal
Visualising Carrier Consolidation and Alternative Delivery Locations: A Digital Model of Last-Mile Delivery in England and Wales
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Objective Technology-Based Approach to Home Healthcare Routing Problem Considering Sustainability Aspects
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Examining the Intention to Adopt an Online Platform for Freight Forwarding Services in Thailand: A Modified Unified Theory for Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model Approach

by
Nattakorn Pinyanitikorn
1,
Walailak Atthirawong
2 and
Wirachchaya Chanpuypetch
1,3,*
1
Multidisciplinary and Interdisciplinary School, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
2
School of Science, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand
3
Faculty of Agro-Industry, Chiang Mai University, Samut Sakhon 74000, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Logistics 2024, 8(3), 76; https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics8030076
Submission received: 17 May 2024 / Revised: 12 July 2024 / Accepted: 29 July 2024 / Published: 31 July 2024

Abstract

:
Background: The freight forwarding industry is undergoing digital transformation through the implementation of online platforms designed to enhance operational efficiency and transparency. Despite these benefits, the adoption of these platforms has been slower than anticipated due to customer concerns and industry-specific challenges. Methods: This study investigates the factors influencing the intention to adopt and the actual use of online platforms for freight forwarding services among business customers in Thailand. A modified Unified Theory for Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model, incorporating perceived risk, serves as the theoretical framework. Survey data were collected from 400 respondents in managerial or higher-level positions involved in freight shipping within Thai firms and analyzed using a structural equation model (SEM). Results: The analysis reveals that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions positively influence adoption intention, while perceived risk negatively impacts it. Firm size moderates the effect of social influence, with a stronger impact observed in larger enterprises. Conclusions: The findings offer practical insights for Thai freight forwarders, suggesting strategies to improve customer acceptance and encourage the adoption of online platforms. Addressing the identified factors could lead to improved efficiency and greater integration of digital technologies in the logistics industry.

1. Introduction

The role of freight forwarding services is crucial in enabling international trade by overseeing the intricate process of moving goods across borders for shippers. Acting as intermediaries between exporters/importers and carriers, freight forwarders offer various services, including transportation planning, customs clearance, cargo consolidation, and documentation handling. This industry is characterized by its high fragmentation, with a diverse range of players such as global logistics integrators, regional firms, and local small and medium enterprises (SMEs) competing based on factors like network coverage, specialized knowledge, and customer relations [1,2,3].
In the current business landscape, the rapid growth of e-commerce and digital technologies has posed challenges for numerous industries, including logistics and shipping [2,4]. To address the changing demands of customers, businesses are innovating their models and improving their value propositions. In the freight forwarding sector, exemplified by companies like DHL and UPS, online platforms have emerged to streamline services for their partners and customers [5]. These platforms are disruptive, leveraging digital capabilities to provide instant quotations, aggregate capacity, enable real-time tracking, and offer self-service shipment management solutions [2,6].
The digitalization of the freight forwarding industry has given rise to online platforms that provide shippers with real-time quotes, booking, tracking, and document management capabilities [6,7]. These platforms leverage cloud computing, API integration, and data analytics to streamline manual processes, enhance transparency and shipment visibility, and improve operational efficiency [8]. However, despite the potential benefits of these technologies, the adoption of online platforms remains limited in some contexts [9,10,11]. While global forwarders have introduced online booking and tracking tools in the market, most local firms have been slow to adopt them due to factors such as lack of customer awareness, legacy processes, and resource constraints [12,13]. This variation in adoption rates highlights the differing levels of digital readiness and technology acceptance.
In Thailand, freight forwarders are planning to transition their customers from traditional booking methods through salespersons to an online platform. However, there is no government support for developing a central platform for freight forwarding or other logistics services. As a result, private sectors must individually develop and heavily invest in their platform applications to support their businesses. This initiative aims to improve the service experience and enhance their competitiveness in a highly competitive marketplace.
However, the adoption of online-based freight forwarding service platforms in Thailand remains an innovative and relatively new concept. Despite this, Thailand does not face significant barriers regarding the quality of telecommunication and internet networking, which are sufficient to provide wide-area coverage. Within the Thai industry environment, the primary customers of freight forwarding services are business companies, including both large multinational corporations (MNCs) and, predominantly, small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Therefore, understanding the expectations and concerns of these customer groups regarding the adoption of online-based freight forwarding services within the context of Thai culture is essential. This knowledge is crucial for developing niche platforms that meet customer needs and facilitate the transition to online services.
Several theoretical models have been proposed to explain user acceptance of new technologies; they include the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), and Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT), and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) [14]. Among these, the UTAUT, proposed by Venkatesh et al. [15], integrates elements from various prominent models in the context of information systems [14,15]. Compared to other models, the UTAUT offers a more holistic approach by incorporating a wider range of factors and their interactions, making it highly effective in predicting technology acceptance. Additionally, the UTAUT accounts for the moderating effects of gender, age, experience, and voluntariness of use, providing a nuanced understanding of different user groups [15]. While models like TAM focus primarily on perceived usefulness and ease of use [16], the UTAUT’s broader scope and consideration of social and contextual factors make it a robust and versatile tool for analyzing technology adoption across various settings. Consequently, the UTAUT has been widely applied in recent research to test factors influencing technology acceptance and adoption across various contexts.
Therefore, the primary aim of this study is to examine the factors that influence firms’ intentions to use an online platform for freight forwarding services in Thailand. A significant contribution of this study is the analysis of variables within a modified UTAUT model to determine the effects of various factors related to the adoption of online platforms in the Thai context. This study introduces perceived risk as an additional factor to examine its relationship within the proposed model. Furthermore, interesting moderating variables are suggested to investigate different perspectives among user groups that may affect their adoption intentions for using information technology in the freight forwarding industry.
The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 reviews the literature and develops the hypotheses of this study. Section 3 describes the methodology. Section 4 presents the data analysis and results. Section 5 provides research discussion and implications. And Section 6 concludes this study.

2. Background Literature and Hypotheses

2.1. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)

The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) was developed by Venkatesh et al. in 2003 [15]. The UTAUT posits that that four key factors influence the behavioral intention to adopt a technology: performance expectancy (perceived usefulness), effort expectancy (ease of use), social influence (subjective norms), and facilitating conditions (organizational and technical support). The model also includes four moderating variables—gender, age, experience, and voluntariness of use—which are hypothesized to affect the relationships between the predictors and behavioral intention [15].
The UTAUT has been widely applied to study technology adoption across various contexts, including the acceptance of E-commerce platforms [17], work from home technologies during the COVID-19 pandemic [18], implementation of omnichannel marketing in purchasing [19], mobile banking in China [20], E-payment in Yemen [21], student ICT adoption in Ghana [22], customer usage of logistics technologies such as buy-online-and-pickup-in-store (BOPS), smart lockers and drone delivery [23], sustainable usage intention of blockchain in logistics and supply chain management companies [24,25,26], logistics platform resource integration [27], material procurement in construction companies in India [28], and cloud computing services [29]. These studies have generally confirmed the predictive power of the model while emphasizing the need to adapt it based on the specific technology, regional, and industrial context.
Various studies have proposed modified UTAUT models to examine specific contexts, often by adding or removing independent and moderating variables to the model. In this review, we focus on the adoption of technology within the logistics industry. Additionally, we review the factors used in related contexts, considering the countries involved in the technology adoption. This review aims to identify the most suitable factors for analysis. The related literature on modified UTAUT models for testing the intention to adopt technology in various contexts is summarized in Table 1.
This study aims to explore perceived risk as an additional influencing factor in the intention to adopt an online platform for freight forwarding services, integrating it into the UTAUT model in alignment with similar recent studies [29,30,33,34,35,38,40,41,42]. Additionally, we investigate the potential moderating effects of firm size and user generation on the relationship between the direct factors and the intention to adopt an online platform [29,30,32,34,37,38]. Consequently, the factors influencing the intention to adopt online freight forwarding services are comprehensively reviewed in the following section to develop research hypotheses.

2.2. Development of Influencing Factors toward the Intention to Use an Online Platform for Freight Forwarding Services

The traditional UTAUT model posits that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence positively influence behavioral intention to use, while facilitating conditions positively influence actual use behavior. We have modified the research model by incorporating an additional factor, perceived risk. This factor is expected to negatively impact the intention to use an online platform for freight forwarding services. This section details the hypotheses developed based on these relationships and how they influence the intention to use the platform.

2.2.1. Performance Expectancy (PE)

According to [15], performance expectancy (PE) refers to the belief that a specific technology will improve efficiency and effectiveness of tasks [21]. In this context, PE focuses on users’ perceptions of convenience, service-tracking enhancements, and quality of service offered by an online platform for freight forwarding services [20,21,43]. While PE might not capture all aspects of perceived value (e.g., cost saving), it remains a critical factor influencing user adoption [17]. Previous research supports a positive relationship between perceived usefulness (similar to PE) and intention to use technological systems [2,32,44]. Therefore, we hypothesized that a higher perceived PE (convenience, service tracking, quality of service) will lead to a stronger intention to use an online platform for freight forwarding services. This hypothesis will be further tested empirically in this study.
H1: 
Performance expectancy has a positive influence on the intention of Thai firms to use an online platform for freight forwarding services.

2.2.2. Effort Expectancy (EE)

Effort expectancy (EE) reflects the perceived difficulty in using a technology. Users who find a technology difficult to learn or use may become discouraged and discontinue use [15]. In the context of online freight forwarding platforms, EE refers to the perceived ease of using the platform’s interface, navigating functionalities, and completing tasks like booking shipments or tracking goods. Previous research has shown that perceived ease of use (similar to EE) positively impacts the intention to use technological systems [31,45]. Studies by Alwahaishi and Snášel (2013) [46,47] and Sarfaraz (2017) [48] also confirm the significant influence of EE on users’ intention to adopt ICT technologies. Therefore, the following hypothesis explores the relationship between EE and intention to use an online platform for freight forwarding services.
H2: 
Effort expectancy has a significant positive influence on the intention of Thai firms to use an online platform for freight forwarding services.

2.2.3. Social Influence (SI)

Social influence (SI) reflects the effect of referent opinions from important others on individual user behavior [49,50]. In the context of Thai firms, SI can be shaped by recommendations from industry peers, logistics associations, or trusted business partners [2,3]. According to SI theory, users are more likely to adopt a technology if those they respect recommend it [15,51]. Therefore, we proposed the following hypothesis:
H3: 
Social influence has a positive influence on the intention of Thai firms to use an online platform for freight forwarding services.

2.2.4. Perceived Risk (PR)

One critical factor not explicitly addressed in the original UTAUT model is perceived risk (PR). In freight forwarding, the stakes are high, with substantial financial and operational implications tied to logistics efficiency and reliability. PR directly influences trust, which is crucial for users when adopting new technologies in this sector [52]. Additionally, the logistics industry frequently handles sensitive data, such as shipment details, customer information, and financial transactions [53]. The PR associated with data security and privacy can significantly affect companies’ willingness to adopt online freight forwarding platforms. Therefore, PR plays a vital role in adoption decisions within this domain. PR refers to the uncertainties and potential negative outcomes a firm perceives from adopting a new system or service [34,54,55,56].
In the context of online platforms, common risk concerns include data security and privacy breaches, system reliability and uptime, integration and interoperability issues, and loss of control over critical business processes [34,35,54,56]. Several empirical studies have demonstrated that PR can negatively impact the adoption intentions of various technologies, such as e-procurement [28], enterprise resource planning (ERP) [32], and blockchain in supply chains [24,25]. These findings suggest that including PR as an additional factor in the UTAUT model could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing the adoption of online freight forwarding platforms. Therefore, the fourth hypothesis was proposed as follows:
H4: 
Perceived risk has a negative influence on the intention of Thai firms to use an online platform for freight forwarding services.

2.2.5. Facilitating Conditions (FCs)

Facilitating conditions (FCs) refer to the resources and knowledge that users need to effectively use a technology [15]. They refer to the belief that there is an organizational and technical infrastructure in place to support the system [57]. If users lack these resources and knowledge, they may not continue using the technology [49]. Alwahaishi and Snášel (2013) [47] studied the factors affecting the acceptance and use of mobile internet as an ICT application in a consumer context and found strong support for FCs based on empirical data. Similarly, FCs have been found to influence consumer adoption of cloud computing services in Germany [29], blockchain adoption in logistics companies in Vietnam [26], online shopping in Bangladesh [58], and E-payment in Yemen [21]. Additionally, studies have shown a significant relationship between FCs and the actual use of internet banking [44]. Most research confirms that intention to use positively impact the actual use of technologies, such as adopting big data in supply chain management [31], and material procurement in construction companies in India [28]. Based on these findings, two hypotheses regarding the FC factor were formulated as follows:
H5: 
Facilitating conditions have a positive influence on the intention of Thai firms to use an online platform for freight forwarding services.
H6: 
Facilitating conditions have a positive influence on the actual use of an online platform for freight forwarding services by Thai firms.

2.2.6. Intention to Use (IU) and Actual Use (AU)

In the traditional UTAUT model, intention to use (IU) is widely recognized as a strong predictor of actual use (AU). Given its close alignment with behavior, many studies incorporating intentions into their frameworks focus on measuring behavioral adoption intentions. Individuals tend to be more engaged when their intention towards using a technology is positive, significantly impacting usage behavior with the intention to continue use, indicating a proactive effort and planning to use the technology. Previous studies have shown a positive influence of IU on AU, such as in the use of ICT in tourism [43] and E-government services [59]. Based on these observations, the seventh hypothesis was formulated as follows:
H7: 
Intention to use has a positive influence on the actual use of an online platform for freight forwarding services by Thai firms.

2.2.7. Moderators

Additionally, this study aims to explore how firm size and user generation moderate the relationship between the main factors and the intention to use an online platform for freight forwarding services. Existing studies indicate that firm size may have specific characteristics that affect the adoption of information technology, particularly in small and medium-sized enterprises [9,11,37,60,61,62,63]. Furthermore, we refine the traditional UTAUT model by adjusting the respondents’ age to consider generation or age group, as this factor may influence the intention to use information systems. Therefore, the following hypotheses were developed to be tested with empirical data in the context of Thailand. Eight sub-hypotheses were proposed to test the moderating effect of firm size (H8a–d) and user generation (H9a–d) on the relationships between intention to use (IU) and the proposed UTAUT predictors: performance expectancy (PE), effort expectancy (EE), social influence (SI), and perceived risk (PR).
H8a: 
The impact of performance expectancy on intention to use is moderated by firm size.
H8b: 
The impact of effort expectancy on intention to use is moderated by firm size.
H8c: 
The impact of social influence on intention to use is moderated by firm size.
H8d: 
The impact of perceived risk on intention to use is moderated by firm size.
H9a: 
The impact of performance expectancy on intention to use is moderated by user generation.
H9b: 
The impact of effort expectancy on intention to use is moderated by user generation.
H9c: 
The impact of social influence on intention to use is moderated by user generation.
H9d: 
The impact of perceived risk on intention to use is moderated by user generation.

2.3. Proposed Structural Model

Based on the literature review, this study proposes a modified UTAUT-based model to analyze the factors influencing the intention to adopt an online platform for freight forwarding services by Thai firms. This model expands the UTAUT framework by integrating perceived risk as an additional significant inhibitor of adoption intention, alongside the four primary predictors: performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions.
Furthermore, the model includes two moderating variables, firm size and user generation, to explore their potential impacts on the relationships between the predictors and the intention to adopt online platforms for freight forwarding services. Firm size is suggested as a moderator based on previous studies [30,32], which indicates that larger firms may have distinct considerations and capabilities regarding technology adoption compared to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) [9,60]. User generation is also incorporated as a moderator based on UTAUT’s proposition that younger individuals may exhibit greater openness to new technologies than older generations. The proposed modified UTAUT-based model for this study is illustrated in Figure 1.

3. Methodology

3.1. Participants

This study utilized a quantitative, cross-sectional survey design to collect data for testing the hypothesized relationships in the research model. The target population comprised employees in Thai firms responsible for making decisions or managing processes related to the use of freight forwarding services for their organizations’ cross-border shipping needs. This included roles such as supply chain managers, logistics managers, import/export managers, and shipping executives.
To recruit participants, a purposive sampling approach was employed through two main channels. Firstly, an industry database maintained by the Thai International Freight Forwarders Association (TIFFA) was used to identify potential respondents based on their job titles and company profiles. To mitigate bias, the population within this group was proportionally divided into strata based on the key demographic variable of firm size. Participants from each stratum were then selected using sampling techniques to reduce selection bias. Secondly, the customer databases of five leading freight forwarders operating in Thailand were utilized to reach out to key decision-makers in their client organizations. The participating forwarders were selected based on their market share, service offerings, and willingness to support the research.
The sample size was determined to be 400, which is widely recognized and applied across various research fields for its statistical accuracy of ±5% and is often considered the most cost-effective sample size [64,65]. According to the literature [66], a minimum sample size of 200 is typically required for robust SEM analysis.

3.2. Measures and Questionnaire

This study employed a survey questionnaire, which was presented in the Thai language for accessibility and structured into two main sections. The first section gathered demographic information and usage experience of participants, including their position, age group, average use of freight forwarding shipment services, and the size of their company. The second part consisted of Likert-scale questions concerning factors influencing the intention to adopt an online platform for freight forwarding services. Respondents rated their opinions using a five-point Likert scale, ranging from “strongly agree” (5) to “strongly disagree” (1).
Before distribution, the questionnaire underwent content validity testing using the Index Objective Congruence (IOC) to ensure the accuracy of its content [67]. Three experts from selected freight forwarding companies reviewed the questionnaire. Based on their feedback, minor modifications were made to improve the wording and flow of the questions.
To assess the questionnaire’s reliability, it was pretested with a sample of 30 logistics professionals to ensure clarity, comprehensiveness, and reliability. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient ( α ) was used to measure the questionnaire’s reliability, with a value greater than 0.7 indicating good reliability [68].
The final survey instrument was implemented on an online survey platform. Data collection took place from February to April 2024, during which rigorous quality checks were implemented to ensure the validity of responses. Survey forms with suspicious response styles or incomplete answers were excluded from the analysis. The measurement is the questionnaire used in this research is presented in Table 2.

3.3. Data Analysis: Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)

In this study, we followed a two-step approach to structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis, as recommended by [72]. Firstly, we conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to assess the reliability and validity of the measurement scales used in our proposed model. This step allowed us to evaluate the adequacy of the measurement model by examining goodness-of-fit criteria, including the minimum discrepancy divided by degrees of freedom (CMIN/df), the Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI), Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA), and Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) [73].
After validating the measurement model, we estimated the structural model using maximum likelihood estimation. This step involved examining path coefficients to determine the strength and significance of relationships between latent variables in our model. We also evaluated the overall fit of the structural model using fit indices.
Data analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS and AMOS 26.0 statistical packages. SPSS was utilized for data preparation and descriptive statistics, whereas AMOS 26.0 was employed for CFA and SEM analysis. This study included a sample of 400 respondents who are employees in Thai firms responsible for decisions or processes related to the use of freight forwarding services. The two-step SEM analysis provided valuable insights into the concurrent influences among the factors in our conceptual model, helping us to understand the complex relationships between variables and their implications for theory and practice.

4. Results

4.1. Demographic Structure of Respondents

The main part of this research study involved distributing an online questionnaire. A total of 400 complete responses were collected, with all respondents having experience using freight forwarding services in the past three months. The majority of the respondents held positions as import or export managers (43.3%) and logistics managers (35.5%). In terms of firm size, 45.3% were from small enterprises, while 35.5% were from medium-sized enterprises. Regarding generational categories (age group), the majority were Gen Y or millennials (30–43 years old), accounting for 65.5% of all respondents. Table 3 presents key aspects of the demographic structure of the respondents.

4.2. Assessment of the Measurement Model

Before analyzing the measurement model, descriptive statistics were computed for the 28 observed variables related to the acceptance of adopting an online platform for freight forwarding services in Thai firms. Each statement in the questionnaire, detailed in Table 2, was rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “strongly agree” (5) to “strongly disagree” (1). The survey, conducted with 400 respondents, indicated that the degree of agreement for each observation item was higher than the moderate value or scale “3”, except for the item measuring “Perceived Risk (PR)”. This particular variable highlighted barriers or negative outcomes in the adoption of an online platform for freight forwarding services, where a lower score indicated a more positive outlook. The scale was recoded such that “strongly disagree” corresponded to a score of 5 and “strongly agree” to 1.
In preparation for structural equation model (SEM) or confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), assessing the normality of the data is crucial [74]. Typically, multivariate normality is tested, and for sample sizes larger than 300, normality can be evaluated using histograms and by examining the absolute values of skewness and kurtosis. In SPSS, these values should ideally approximate zero in a normal distribution [75,76]. For this study, skewness and kurtosis values within the range of ±1.96 indicate normal distribution [77]. Detailed descriptive statistics of the variables and results of normality testing are presented in Table 4.
To confirm the reliability and validity of the structural model, individual questionnaire responses were analyzed. Factor loading (FL) values were calculated for each question to determine the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) and Construct Reliability (CR) values. The results are presented in Table 5, where it can be observed that all FL values exceed 0.5, all AVE values exceed 0.5, and all CR values exceed 0.6 (with CR values for all variables exceed 0.80) [78]. Cronbach’s alpha values presented in Table 5 meet the minimum acceptable value of 0.70 for all the variables [68]. Therefore, the internal consistency and reliability of the scales used in this study are considered satisfactory.
Subsequently, each item within every factor underwent rigorous evaluation using reduction techniques to confirm its alignment with the intended constructs. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is a statistical method essential for examining relationships among latent variables which is integral to SEM methodology and crucial for validating measurement models in path or structural analyses. CFA estimates latent variables based on the correlated variation within the dataset. Before assessing the structural model in SEM, researchers ensure that the measured variables accurately reflect the intended constructs or factors.
The structural equation model (SEM) in this study demonstrates a strong fit across several key goodness-of-fit criteria. The CMIN/df ratio, which measures the discrepancy between the model and observed data adjusted for degrees of freedom, is reported at 3.306, indicating a good fit, as values below 5 are generally considered acceptable. The Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) stands impressively low, at 0.044, well below the threshold of 0.08, suggesting a very close fit of the model to the data. The Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) is also low, at 0.032, indicating excellent fit where values closer to zero denote better model fit. The Non-normed Fit Index (NNFI) or Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI) is reported at 0.779, slightly below the preferred threshold of 0.90 but still acceptable, suggesting the model provides a reasonable fit relative to a baseline model. Similarly, the Comparative Fit Index (CFI), at 0.833, though also slightly below 0.90, indicates a good overall fit of the model to the data. These findings collectively indicate that the SEM in this study exhibits a robust fit according to most criteria, suggesting it accurately represents the relationships among the variables under investigation. However, the slightly lower values of NNFI and CFI suggest that there may still be room for improvement, such as refining the model specification or addressing potential measurement issues. The results, alongside the cut-off values denoting a good fit, are presented in Table 6.

4.3. Structural Model and Hypotheses Testing

This step involved testing the structural model to elucidate the relationships between constructs in the research model. Path analysis, a common form of SEM analysis, was employed to investigate the direct impact and causal relationships among variables. The significance of each hypothesized structural path was assessed using standardized path coefficients ( β ) and p-values.
Table 7 displays the path values, critical ratio (C.R.), standard error (S.E.), and significance level (p-value). In the analysis, the absolute value of the standardized path coefficient ( β ) indicates the magnitude of influence, with positive values indicating a positive influence and negative values indicating a negative influence. The critical ratio (C.R.) for the independent variable is a z statistic, equal to the ration of the parameter estimate to its standard deviation. The p-value represents the probability of the statistical test of C.R.
Six paths were found to be significant at p < 0.001, while one path was significant at p < 0.05. All paths were considered significant, as the C.R. exceeded 1.96 and the p-value was less than 0.05. The notation “***” and “*” denotes p-values less than 0.001 and 0.05, respectively.
The analysis of influencing factors revealed that hypotheses H1–H7 are supported. Perceived risk (PR) was found to have a significant negative impact on the intention to use (IU) ( β = −0.211, p < 0.001), supporting the fourth hypothesis (H4). This finding contradicts various existing literature on the acceptance of online platforms [55,56,87], which suggests that PR reduces the willingness to use an online platform for freight forwarding services. Organizations are aware of potential loss of time and important information in services, as well as of the capabilities of their staff.
Additionally, the effect of performance expectancy (PE) on the intention to use (IU) was found to be positive and significant ( β = 0.478, p < 0.001), supporting the first hypothesis (H1). Firms intending to use an online platform for freight forwarding services believe that the platform will simplify and enhance efficiency in their activities compared to paper-based processes. Similarly, the result indicates that effort expectancy (EE) was positively and significantly related to the IU ( β = 0.168, p < 0.05), confirming the second hypothesis (H2). This result suggests that firms are making efforts to understand and try new information systems for their business.
Furthermore, the third hypothesis (H3) revealed that social influence (SI) has a positive and significant impact on the intention to use (IU) ( β = 0.262, p < 0.001). Digital transformation can enhance satisfaction among supply chain partners, thereby supporting H3.
Moreover, the fifth hypothesis (H5) suggested that facilitating conditions (FCs) have a positively significant effect on the intention to use (IU) ( β = 0.458, p < 0.001), thus H5 was supported. Similarly, FCs also positively influenced actual use (AU), confirming the sixth hypothesis (H6) ( β = 0.442, p < 0.001). This indicates that support from the company, including managerial support to enhance knowledge for digital transformation and information technology facilities, promotes the use of an online platform in their activities.
Finally, the intention to use (IU) was found to have a positively significant effect on actual use (AU) ( β = 0.663, p < 0.001), supporting H7. The staff of the firm’s intention to use an online platform for freight forwarding services leads to actual use of the platform and prompts digital transformation in their logistics processes. The structural model and path coefficients is illustrated in Figure 2.

4.4. Analysis of Moderating Effects

The moderating effects of firm size and user generation on the structural model were examined using multigroup analysis. Hypotheses five and six predicted that organization size and generation would moderate the effect of variables (performance expectancy (PE), effort expectancy (EE), social influence (SI), and perceived risk (PR)) on the intention to use of an online platform for freight forwarding services, respectively. Each moderating variable was split into two groups and analyzed using the critical ratios approach [73].
For the first moderating variable, “firm size,” respondents were divided into small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) (n = 323) and large-sized enterprises (n = 77) for examination. For the second moderating variable, “generation,” respondents were split into Generation X (age over 43 years old, n = 61) and Generation Y or Millennials and Generation Z (age less than 43, n = 339) for comparison based on generation context.
The effects of the two moderating variables are presented in Table 8. Estimates are unstandardized coefficients. z-scores indicate the significance of difference between path coefficients. The symbols ***, **, and * indicate significance at p < 0.001, 0.01, and 0.05, respectively.
Table 8 presents the results, with z-scores indicating the significance of the difference between path coefficients. The analysis reveals that social influence (SI) has a significant impact on the intention to use (IU) in both firm sizes, with the effect being significantly stronger among large organizations. Therefore, hypothesis H5c was confirmed with a z-score greater than 1.96 (z-score = 2.187, p < 0.01). However, the other factors investigated, including performance expectancy (PE), effort expectancy (EE), and perceived risk (PR), showed no significant differences between SMEs and large enterprises, as indicated by z-scores less than 1.96. This means hypotheses H8a, H8b, and H8d were rejected.
Regarding user generation or age group as a moderating variable, Generation Y and Generation Z were regrouped into the same category due to their similar information technology skills and knowledge compared to previous generations. The results indicate that there were no significant differences in any of the constructs between Generation X and Generation Y or Z respondents. Consequently, all six hypotheses, H9a–H9d, were rejected, as the z-scores were less than 1.96. In other words, the effect of PE, EE, SI, and PR on adoption intention is not moderated by user generation.

5. Discussion and Implications

5.1. Discussion of Results

This study aimed to analyze the factors influencing the adoption an online platform for freight forwarding services, leading to actual use behavior in Thailand. The main variables observed were performance expectancy (PE), effort expectancy (EE), social influence (SI), facilitating condition (FC), and perceived risk (PR), based on the modified UTAUT model. A survey was conducted with 400 participants from Thai firms that have experience using freight forwarding services.
Out of the fifteen hypotheses tested, eight were accepted (H1–H7), while the rest were rejected (H8a, H8b, H8d, H9a–H9d). H8c was accepted based on the moderating effect tests for firm size.
The findings of this study confirm the significant positive impact of performance expectancy (PE) on the intention to use an online platform for freight forwarding services in Thailand. This result aligns with [15], suggesting that PE influences continuance intention. Additionally, this study is consistent with previous research on the use of new technologies in logistics activities [41,42,47,88], indicating that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and risk perception significantly influence users’ intention to use new technologies. This implies that a higher perceived degree of PE by users leads to a greater intention to use an online platform.
Effort expectancy (EE) was also found to significantly affect the intention to use an online platform for freight forwarding service positively. This indicates that a high perceived degree of EE by user leads to a greater intention to use the platform. As explained by [15], EE reflects the perceived difficulty in using a new technology. The results of this study are consistent with previous research showing that perceived ease of use (similar to EE) affects user satisfaction [42,55] and continued use [42], as well as intention to use [47].
Social influence (SI) was found to have a significant positive effect on the intention to use an online platform for freight forwarding services. This suggests that a higher perceived degree of SI among users leads to a greater intention to use the technology. SI reflects the effect of referent opinion on individual user behavior [89]. These results are consistent with previous studies [31,90], which also found that SI significantly influences the intention to continue using online platforms or information technologies for related logistics and supply chain management activities. Additionally, Lee and Song [56] found that performance expectancy and social influence positively influence behavioral intention, a finding that aligns with the results of this study.
The results of this study confirmed that perceived risk (PR) significantly influenced the intention to use an online platform for freight forwarding services, with a negative impact. This implies that a higher perception of associated risks among users leads to a lower level of intention to use the technology. Digital risk represents unexpected breakdowns, contagions, and interruptions between the company and business partners in the supply chain [91]. Similarly, Lee and Song [56] studied the effects of trust and PR on user adoption of a new technology service and found that trust and PR are direct antecedents of intention to use, which is consistent with the findings of this study. Abrahão et al. [92] investigated the intention to use ICT services based on the UTAUT and found that 76% of behavioral intentions were explained by performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and perceived risk, which is also supported by the findings of this study.
The results confirmed that facilitating conditions (FCs) significantly affected the intention to use and actual use of an online platform for freight forwarding services in Thai firms, with a positive impact. This indicates that a higher favorability of FCs as perceived by users leads to a higher level of adoption intention toward the technology. FCs refer to users having the necessary resources and knowledge to use the technology, as explained in [15]. In an organizational context, FCs are defined as one’s belief that an organizational and technical infrastructure exists to support the system [57,88]. Similarly, Alwahaishi and Snášel [46] empirically investigated how FCs influence the acceptance and use of ICT applications. In logistics companies, FCs positively influence the behavioral intention to use blockchain [26]. Alalwan et al. [44] found similar results supporting that there is a statistically significant relationship between facilitating conditions and the actual use of online financial services, which is also similar to some of the facilities needed to use e-services. For SMEs in European nations, digitalization adoption is also influenced by FCs [93], as supported by this study regarding our participants’ demographic (Table 3), where 80.8% of respondents are SMEs.
In the proposed modified UTAUT model, the impact of the main factors was not moderated by firm size and generation, except for social influence (SI). Firm size was found to moderate SI, suggesting that the relationship between SI and intention to use was significant for both SMEs and particularly for large-sized enterprises. Large enterprises often rely on high-potential emerging technologies or technological innovations to enhance their competitiveness, outperform competitors [94,95], and ensure business sustainability [96,97].
The results confirmed that the intention to use significantly influenced the actual use in the case of applying an online platform for freight forwarding services in Thailand. This finding is consistent with several other studies [59,98,99].

5.2. Practical Implications

In response to the findings suggesting practical implications for freight forwarding companies, the action plan focuses on several key strategies aimed at improving the adoption of online platforms. The first strategy emphasizes highlighting the performance benefits of these platforms, such as enhanced logistics efficiency and reduced reliance on paper-based processes. To achieve this, the marketing team will develop comprehensive marketing materials, including videos and case studies. Concurrently, the customer success team will organize workshops and webinars to demonstrate firsthand how these platforms can optimize logistics operations.
The second strategy centers on ensuring robust IT support and infrastructure. This involves establishing a dedicated IT support team to provide immediate assistance to customers encountering platform-related issues. Additionally, the IT department will focus on developing and reinforcing the necessary IT infrastructure to ensure seamless platform functionality, particularly catering to the needs of SMEs lacking extensive IT resources.
A crucial aspect of the plan involves leveraging social influence to foster platform adoption. This strategy begins with identifying and partnering with prominent freight forwarding firms willing to serve as early adopters and demonstrate successful platform implementations. This initiative aims to create positive role models within the industry. Moreover, the marketing team will collaborate to document and promote these success stories through various channels, thereby building confidence and interest among potential users.
Addressing perceived risks associated with online platforms constitutes the fourth strategy. Immediate measures include implementing stringent data security protocols to safeguard customer information. Concurrently, the customer success team will actively collect and disseminate positive testimonials from satisfied customers, fostering trust and mitigating apprehensions surrounding platform usage. Furthermore, enhancing customer support services will ensure prompt resolution of any concerns, further bolstering customer confidence in the platform’s reliability.
Lastly, streamlining the user experience stands as the fifth strategy to facilitate platform adoption. This involves refining the platform’s user interface through rigorous user testing and iterative design improvements, overseen by the UX/UI design team. Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) tools will further enhance user interaction by providing instant and continuous support. Simultaneously, the training department will develop comprehensive user tutorials and guides within two months to streamline onboarding processes and minimize the learning curve for new users.
In conclusion, by adhering to this structured action plan, freight forwarding companies can effectively implement the identified practical implications. This holistic approach not only addresses performance benefits and IT infrastructure requirements but also harnesses social influence, mitigates perceived risks, and enhances user experience. Through these concerted efforts, companies can achieve heightened efficiency, customer satisfaction, and competitive advantage in the marketplace.

5.3. Theoretical Implications

Based on the comprehensive discussion and practical implications derived from this study on factors influencing the adoption of online platforms for freight forwarding services in Thailand, the following theoretical implications can be formulated:
(1)
Extended application of UTAUT model: This study reinforces the robustness of the modified UTAUT model in predicting technology adoption behaviors within the logistics and supply chain management context. It underscores the predictive power of variables such as performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, perceived risk, and facilitating conditions across diverse organizational settings.
(2)
Insights into technology adoption drivers: By identifying and validating factors influencing adoption intentions, such as perceived performance benefits and ease of use, this research provides deeper insights into the cognitive and motivational aspects that shape technology adoption decisions. This contributes to refining theoretical frameworks on technology acceptance by highlighting the nuanced interplay of these factors.
(3)
Contextual understanding in logistics: This study enriches the understanding of technology adoption in the logistics industry, emphasizing industry-specific challenges and opportunities. It underscores the importance of organizational readiness, social influences, and perceived risks as critical factors requiring tailored strategies for successful implementation of new technology platforms.
(4)
Implication for risk management strategies: This study’s findings on the negative impact of perceived risk on adoption intentions emphasize the critical role of effective risk management strategies in technology adoption initiatives. This prompts further exploration into strategies for mitigating risks and integrating them into adoption frameworks to alleviate user concerns and enhance adoption rates.
(5)
Generalizability and transferability of findings: The research findings contribute to the generalizability of technology adoption theories across various contexts, providing insights applicable to similar industries and technological innovations. This supports broader applications of theoretical frameworks in understanding and predicting technology adoption behaviors across different organizational environments.
These theoretical implications not only advance academic understanding of technology adoption processes but also offer practical guidance for stakeholders in the logistics sector. They can help in devising effective adoption strategies, improving operational efficiencies, and fostering growth driven by innovation.

6. Conclusions

6.1. Research Conclusions

This study’s findings significantly contribute to understanding the factors influencing the adoption an online platform for freight forwarding services among business customers in the Thai market. The research concludes that performance expectancy (PE), effort expectancy (EE), social influence (SI), perceived risk (PR), and facilitating conditions (FCs) are critical determinants of adoption intention. Additionally, this study reveals a moderating effect of firm size on the relationship between social influence (SI) and intention to use (IU), indicating that larger firms may be more influenced by social factors in their adoption decisions.
These findings have several implications for both theory and practice. Theoretically, this study extends the UTAUT model by incorporating perceived risk (PR) as an additional main factor and firm size as a moderating variable, providing a more comprehensive understanding of technology adoption in the logistics industry in the Thai context. Practically, the results can guide freight forwarding service providers in developing tailored strategies to promote the adoption of online platforms, such as emphasizing the performance benefits, simplifying the user experience, addressing social influences, mitigating perceived risks, and enhancing facilitation conditions.
Overall, this research contributes valuable insights that can inform the development and implementation of an online platform for freight forwarding services, ultimately enhancing the efficiency and competitiveness of the logistics industry in Thailand.

6.2. Limitations and Future Research Direction

This study has several limitations that present opportunities for future research. Firstly, the cross-sectional design, while useful for capturing a snapshot of adoption perceptions, restricts understanding of how these decisions evolve over time. Longitudinal studies could provide valuable insights into the dynamic nature of adoption decisions. Secondly, the focus on the Thai market may limit the generalizability of the findings. Replicating this study in other countries and cultures would enhance the external validity of the results.
Another limitation is the sample composition, which included more respondents from SMEs than large enterprises. This imbalance could have influenced the results, reflecting the predominance of small and medium-sized companies in the Thai market. It suggests the need for a more balanced sample in future studies to enhance the robustness of findings regarding moderator effects. While full measurement invariance testing was not conducted due to limitations in the Thai industry environment and time constraints, future research should consider employing larger sample sizes with balanced group distributions and conducting thorough measurement invariance testing to strengthen the validity of findings in multigroup analysis (MGA).
Additionally, due to resource constraints including a limited time and budget, a comprehensive statistical power analysis was not conducted. Addressing this limitation in future research would ensure that sample sizes are adequately determined to minimize the risk of Type II errors [100]. While the UTAUT model identifies several key factors influencing technology acceptance, it may overlook context-specific variables that are crucial in certain settings. Future research could explore additional moderators, such as industry sector and technology readiness, to further refine the understanding of adoption drivers and barriers within specific context. To investigate indirect effects and more intricate interactions between components, future research should include a mediating variable of intention to use between exogenous variables. This approach will allow for a more thorough comprehension of the phenomenon being studied.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.P. and W.C.; methodology, N.P., W.A. and W.C.; validation, W.A. and W.C.; formal analysis, N.P.; investigation, N.P.; writing—original draft preparation, N.P. and W.C.; writing—review and editing, N.P., W.A. and W.C.; visualization, W.A. and W.C.; supervision, W.A. and W.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the first author. The data are not publicly available due to ethical restrictions.

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by Chiang Mai University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Song, D. A Literature Review, Container Shipping Supply Chain: Planning Problems and Research Opportunities. Logistics 2021, 5, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Raza, Z.; Woxenius, J.; Vural, C.A.; Lind, M. Digital Transformation of Maritime Logistics: Exploring Trends in the Liner Shipping Segment. Comput. Ind. 2023, 145, 103811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cichosz, M.; Wallenburg, C.M.; Knemeyer, A.M. Digital Transformation at Logistics Service Providers: Barriers, Success Factors and Leading Practices. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2020, 31, 209–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gupta, S.; Kushwaha, P.S.; Badhera, U.; Chatterjee, P.; Gonzalez, E.D.R.S. Identification of Benefits, Challenges, and Pathways in E-Commerce Industries: An Integrated Two-Phase Decision-Making Model. Sustain. Oper. Comput. 2023, 4, 200–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Reinartz, W.; Wiegand, N.; Imschloss, M. The Impact of Digital Transformation on the Retailing Value Chain. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2019, 36, 350–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Surucu-Balci, E.; Iris, Ç.; Balci, G. Digital Information in Maritime Supply Chains with Blockchain and Cloud Platforms: Supply Chain Capabilities, Barriers, and Research Opportunities. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2024, 198, 122978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jain, A.; van der Heijden, R.; Marchau, V.; Bruckmann, D. Towards Rail-Road Online Exchange Platforms in EU-Freight Transportation Markets: An Analysis of Matching Supply and Demand in Multimodal Services. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chanpuypetch, W.; Supeekit, T.; Niemsakul, J. IOT-Based Business Process Management for Temperature-Controlled Logistics of Laboratory Specimens. In Proceedings of the 37th ECMS International Conference on Modelling and Simulation, ECMS 2023, Florence, Italy, 20–23 June 2023; Vicario, E., Bandinelli, R., Fani, V., Mastroianni, M., Eds.; European Council for Modeling and Simulation: Caserta, Italy, 2023; pp. 359–365. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mishrif, A.; Khan, A. Technology Adoption as Survival Strategy for Small and Medium Enterprises during COVID-19. J. Innov. Entrep. 2023, 12, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kraus, S.; Jones, P.; Kailer, N.; Weinmann, A.; Chaparro-Banegas, N.; Roig-Tierno, N. Digital Transformation: An Overview of the Current State of the Art of Research. Sage Open 2021, 11, 215824402110475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ueasangkomsate, P. Adoption E-Commerce for Export Market of Small and Medium Enterprises in Thailand. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 207, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zamani, S.Z. Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Facing an Evolving Technological Era: A Systematic Literature Review on the Adoption of Technologies in SMEs. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2022, 25, 735–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yadav, H.; Soni, U.; Gupta, S.; Kumar, G. Evaluation of Barriers in the Adoption of E-Commerce Technology in SMEs. J. Electron. Commer. Organ. 2021, 20, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Taherdoost, H. A Review of Technology Acceptance and Adoption Models and Theories. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 22, 960–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M.G.; Davis, G.B.; Davis, F.D. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Q. 2003, 27, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. He, Y.; Chen, Q.; Kitkuakul, S. Regulatory Focus and Technology Acceptance: Perceived Ease of Use and Usefulness as Efficacy. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2018, 5, 1459006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, L.; Rashidin, M.S.; Song, F.; Wang, Y.; Javed, S.; Wang, J. Determinants of Consumer’s Purchase Intention on Fresh E-Commerce Platform: Perspective of UTAUT Model. Sage Open 2021, 11, 215824402110278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Razif, M.; Miraja, B.A.; Persada, S.F.; Nadlifatin, R.; Belgiawan, P.F.; Redi, A.A.N.P.; Lin, S.-C. Investigating the Role of Environmental Concern and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology on Working from Home Technologies Adoption during COVID-19. Entrep. Sustain. Issues 2020, 8, 795–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sari, D.M.F.P.; Suprapti, N.W.S.; Sukaatmadja, I.P.G.; Sukawati, T.G.R. The Implementation of Purchasing Omnichannel Marketing Based through the Expansion of the UTAUT 2 Model. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2023, 11, 1441–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mensah, I.K.; Khan, M.K. Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model: Factors Influencing Mobile Banking Services’ Adoption in China. Sage Open 2024, 14, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alduais, F.; Al-Smadi, M.O. Intention to Use E-Payments from the Perspective of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Evidence from Yemen. Economies 2022, 10, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Attuquayefio, S.; Addo, H. Using the UTAUT Model to Analyze Students’ ICT Adoption. Int. J. Educ. Dev. Using Inf. Commun. Technol. 2014, 10, 75–86. [Google Scholar]
  23. Cai, L.; Yuen, K.F.; Xie, D.; Fang, M.; Wang, X. Consumer’s Usage of Logistics Technologies: Integration of Habit into the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Technol. Soc. 2021, 67, 101789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Park, K.O. A Study on Sustainable Usage Intention of Blockchain in the Big Data Era: Logistics and Supply Chain Management Companies. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shahzad, K.; Zhang, Q.; Khan, M.K. Blockchain Technology Adoption in Supply Chain Management: An Investigation from UTAUT and Information System Success Model. Int. J. Shipp. Transp. Logist. 2024, 18, 165–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nguyen, L.-T.; Nguyen, D.-T.; Ngoc, K.N.-N.; Duc, D.T.V. Blockchain Adoption in Logistics Companies in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2023, 10, 2216436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gan, W.; Fu, C.; Chen, Z.; Zhong, R. Research on Logistics Platform Resource Integration Based on UTAUT Model. In Proceeding of the 24th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management 2018; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 542–548. [Google Scholar]
  28. HM, A.J.; KB, A.; VR, H. Technology Adoption in Material Procurement: An Empirical Study Applying the UTAUT Model Among Construction Companies in India. Glob. Bus. Rev. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Moryson, H.; Moeser, G. Consumer Adoption of Cloud Computing Services in Germany: Investigation of Moderating Effects by Applying an UTAUT Model. Int. J. Mark. Stud. 2016, 8, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Senk, C. Adoption of Security as a Service. J. Internet Serv. Appl. 2013, 4, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Queiroz, M.M.; Pereira, S.C.F. Intention to Adopt BIG DATA in Supply Chain Management: A Brazilian Perspective. Rev. Adm. Empresas 2019, 59, 389–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Uddin, M.A.; Alam, M.S.; Mamun, A.A.; Khan, T.-U.-Z.; Akter, A. A Study of the Adoption and Implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP): Identification of Moderators and Mediator. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chayomchai, A.; Phonsiri, W.; Junjit, A.; Boongapim, R.; Suwannapusit, U. Factors Affecting Acceptance and Use of Online Technology in Thai People during COVID-19 Quarantine Time. Manag. Sci. Lett. 2020, 10, 3009–3016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Esawe, A.T. Exploring Retailers’ Behavioural Intentions Towards Using M-Payment: Extending UTAUT with Perceived Risk and Trust. Paradig. A Manag. Res. J. 2022, 26, 8–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Namahoot, K.S.; Jantasri, V. Integration of UTAUT Model in Thailand Cashless Payment System Adoption: The Mediating Role of Perceived Risk and Trust. J. Sci. Technol. Policy Manag. 2023, 14, 634–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bai, B.; Guo, Z. Understanding Users’ Continuance Usage Behavior Towards Digital Health Information System Driven by the Digital Revolution Under COVID-19 Context: An Extended UTAUT Model. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 2022, 15, 2831–2842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Misra, R.; Mahajan, R.; Singh, N.; Khorana, S.; Rana, N.P. Factors Impacting Behavioural Intentions to Adopt the Electronic Marketplace: Findings from Small Businesses in India. Electron. Mark. 2022, 32, 1639–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Odusanya, K.; Aluko, O.; Lal, B. Building Consumers’ Trust in Electronic Retail Platforms in the Sub-Saharan Context: An Exploratory Study on Drivers and Impact on Continuance Intention. Inf. Syst. Front. 2022, 24, 377–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Antwi-Boampong, A.; Boison, D.; Doumbia, M.; Boakye, A.; Osei-Fosua, L.; Owiredu Sarbeng, K. Factors Affecting Port Users’ Behavioral Intentions to Adopt Financial Technology (Fintech) in Ports in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Case of Ports in Ghana. FinTech 2022, 1, 362–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Persada, S.F.; Afandi, F.; Redi, A.A.N.P.; Nadlifatin, R.; Prasetyo, Y.T.; Kurniawan, A.C. Mix Method Analysis for Analyzing User Behavior on Logistic Company Mobile Pocket Software. J. Sist. Dan Manaj. Ind. 2023, 7, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bajunaied, K.; Hussin, N.; Kamarudin, S. Behavioral Intention to Adopt FinTech Services: An Extension of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2023, 9, 100010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sun, W.; Shin, H.Y.; Wu, H.; Chang, X. Extending UTAUT2 with Knowledge to Test Chinese Consumers’ Adoption of Imported Spirits Flash Delivery Applications. Heliyon 2023, 9, e16346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ali, M.B.; Tuhin, R.; Alim, M.A.; Rokonuzzaman, M.; Rahman, S.M.; Nuruzzaman, M. Acceptance and Use of ICT in Tourism: The Modified UTAUT Model. J. Tour. Futures 2022, 10, 334–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Alalwan, A.A. Investigating the Impact of Social Media Advertising Features on Customer Purchase Intention. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2018, 42, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Abbad, M.M.M. Using the UTAUT Model to Understand Students’ Usage of e-Learning Systems in Developing Countries. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2021, 26, 7205–7224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Alwahaishi, S.; Snášel, V. Modeling the Determinants Affecting Consumers’ Acceptance and Use of Information and Communications Technology. Int. J. E-Adopt. 2013, 5, 25–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Alwahaishi, S.; Snásel, V. Consumers’ Acceptance and Use of Information and Communications Technology: A UTAUT and Flow Based Theoretical Model. J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 2013, 8, 9–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sarfaraz, J. Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model-Mobile Banking. J. Internet Bank. Commer. 2017, 22, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhou, T. Understanding Online Community User Participation: A Social Influence Perspective. Internet Res. 2011, 21, 67–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kamal, S.A.; Shafiq, M.; Kakria, P. Investigating Acceptance of Telemedicine Services through an Extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Technol. Soc. 2020, 60, 101212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bagozzi, R.P.; Lee, K.-H. Multiple Routes for Social Influence: The Role of Compliance, Internalization, and Social Identity. Soc. Psychol. Q. 2002, 65, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rathore, B.; Gupta, R.; Biswas, B.; Srivastava, A.; Gupta, S. Identification and Analysis of Adoption Barriers of Disruptive Technologies in the Logistics Industry. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2022, 33, 136–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, X.Y.; Lee, S.Y. A Research on Users’ Behavioral Intention to Adopt Internet of Things (IoT) Technology in the Logistics Industry: The Case of Cainiao Logistics Network. J. Int. Logist. Trade 2023, 21, 41–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, X.; Yu, X. The Impact of Perceived Risk on Consumers’ Cross-Platform Buying Behavior. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 592246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lee, J.-H.; Song, C.H. Effects of Trust and Perceived Risk on User Acceptance of a New Technology Service. Soc. Behav. Pres. 2013, 41, 587–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Qalati, S.A.; Vela, E.G.; Li, W.; Dakhan, S.A.; Hong Thuy, T.T.; Merani, S.H. Effects of Perceived Service Quality, Website Quality, and Reputation on Purchase Intention: The Mediating and Moderating Roles of Trust and Perceived Risk in Online Shopping. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2021, 8, 1869363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Al-Gahtani, S.S. Computer Technology Acceptance Success Factors in Saudi Arabia: An Exploratory Study. J. Glob. Inf. Technol. Manag. 2004, 7, 5–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Islam, S.; Islam, M.F.; Zannat, N.-E. Behavioral Intention to Use Online for Shopping in Bangladesh: A Technology Acceptance Model Analysis. Sage Open 2023, 13, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Camilleri, M.A. The Online Users’ Perceptions toward Electronic Government Services. J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc. 2020, 18, 221–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Radicic, D.; Petković, S. Impact of Digitalization on Technological Innovations in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs). Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2023, 191, 122474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lertwongsatien, C.; Wongpinunwatana, N. E-Commerce Adoption in Thailand: An Empirical Study of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). J. Glob. Inf. Technol. Manag. 2003, 6, 67–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Omoruyi, O. Influence of Information Technology on Logistics Integration and Delivery Reliability of Small and Medium Enterprises in Gauteng Province. Int. J. Ebusiness Egovernment Stud. 2018, 10, 34–50. [Google Scholar]
  63. Setiawan, M.D.; Adhariani, D.; Harymawan, I.; Widodo, M. E-commerce and Micro and Small Industries Performance: The Role of Firm Size as a Moderator. J. Open Innov.: Technol. Mark. Complex. 2023, 9, 100142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Andrade, C. Sample Size and Its Importance in Research. Indian. J. Psychol. Med. 2020, 42, 102–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Johnston, K.M.; Lakzadeh, P.; Donato, B.M.K.; Szabo, S.M. Methods of Sample Size Calculation in Descriptive Retrospective Burden of Illness Studies. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2019, 19, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Dash, G.; Paul, J. CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM Methods for Research in Social Sciences and Technology Forecasting. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 173, 121092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Taherdoost, H. Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument; How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire/Survey in a Research. SSRN Electron. J. 2016, 5, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Taber, K.S. The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Res. Sci. Educ. 2018, 48, 1273–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bhattacherjee, A. Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS Q. 2001, 25, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Haddad, S.S.; Nasib, N.F. The Role of Online Platforms in Enhancing Logistics Activity Performance; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2023; pp. 186–203. [Google Scholar]
  71. Hameed, M.A.; Arachchilage, N.A.G. A Conceptual Model for the Organisational Adoption of Information System Security Innovations; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  72. Anderson, J.C.; Gerbing, D.W. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychol. Bull. 1988, 103, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Byrne, B.M. Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS; Routledge: London, UK, 2016; ISBN 9781315757421. [Google Scholar]
  74. Usakli, A.; Rasoolimanesh, S.M. Which SEM to Use and What to Report? A Comparison of CB-SEM and PLS-SEM. In Cutting Edge Research Methods in Hospitality and Tourism; Emerald Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK, 2023; pp. 5–28. [Google Scholar]
  75. Ghasemi, A.; Zahediasl, S. Normality Tests for Statistical Analysis: A Guide for Non-Statisticians. Int. J. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 10, 486–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kim, H.-Y. Statistical Notes for Clinical Researchers: Assessing Normal Distribution (2) Using Skewness and Kurtosis. Restor. Dent. Endod. 2013, 38, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Mishra, P.; Pandey, C.; Singh, U.; Gupta, A.; Sahu, C.; Keshri, A. Descriptive Statistics and Normality Tests for Statistical Data. Ann. Card. Anaesth. 2019, 22, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Marsh, H.W.; Hocevar, D. Application of Confirmatory Factor Analysis to the Study of Self-Concept: First- and Higher Order Factor Models and Their Invariance across Groups. Psychol. Bull. 1985, 97, 562–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kline, R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 4th ed.; Methodology in the Social Sciences; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2016; ISBN 978-1-4625-2334-4 (Paperback); 978-1-4625-2335-1 (Hardcover); 978-1-4625-2300-9 (PDF). [Google Scholar]
  81. MacCallum, R.C.; Browne, M.W.; Sugawara, H.M. Power Analysis and Determination of Sample Size for Covariance Structure Modeling. Psychol. Methods 1996, 1, 130–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Moss, T.P.; Lawson, V.; White, P. Identification of the Underlying Factor Structure of the Derriford Appearance Scale 24. PeerJ 2015, 3, e1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Hu, L.; Bentler, P.M. Fit Indices in Covariance Structure Modeling: Sensitivity to Underparameterized Model Misspecification. Psychol. Methods 1998, 3, 424–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Browne, M.W.; Cudeck, R. Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. Sociol. Methods Res. 1992, 21, 230–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Tucker, L.R.; Lewis, C. A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis. Psychometrika 1973, 38, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Bentler, P.M. Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models. Psychol. Bull. 1990, 107, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Liu, Y.; Shang, M.; Jia, C.; Lim, X.-J.; Ye, Y. Understanding Consumers’ Continuous-Use Intention of Crowdsourcing Logistics Services: Empirical Evidence from China. Heliyon 2024, 10, e29819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Boonsothonsatit, G.; Vongbunyong, S.; Chonsawat, N.; Chanpuypetch, W. Development of a Hybrid AHP-TOPSIS Decision-Making Framework for Technology Selection in Hospital Medication Dispensing Processes. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 2500–2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Graf-Vlachy, L.; Buhtz, K.; König, A. Social Influence in Technology Adoption: Taking Stock and Moving Forward. Manag. Rev. Q. 2018, 68, 37–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kalia, P.; Zia, A.; Kaur, K. Social Influence in Online Retail: A Review and Research Agenda. Eur. Manag. J. 2023, 41, 1034–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Luo, Y. A General Framework of Digitization Risks in International Business. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2022, 53, 344–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Abrahão, R.d.S.; Moriguchi, S.N.; Andrade, D.F. Intention of Adoption of Mobile Payment: An Analysis in the Light of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). RAI Rev. Adm. Inovação 2016, 13, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kwarteng, M.A.; Ntsiful, A.; Diego, L.F.P.; Novák, P. Extending UTAUT with Competitive Pressure for SMEs Digitalization Adoption in Two European Nations: A Multi-Group Analysis. Aslib J. Inf. Manag. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lee, J.; Suh, T.; Roy, D.; Baucus, M. Emerging Technology and Business Model Innovation: The Case of Artificial Intelligence. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2019, 5, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Saarikko, T.; Westergren, U.H.; Blomquist, T. Digital Transformation: Five Recommendations for the Digitally Conscious Firm. Bus. Horiz. 2020, 63, 825–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kazancoglu, I.; Ozbiltekin-Pala, M.; Mangla, S.K.; Kumar, A.; Kazancoglu, Y. Using Emerging Technologies to Improve the Sustainability and Resilience of Supply Chains in a Fuzzy Environment in the Context of COVID-19. Ann. Oper. Res. 2023, 322, 217–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. George, G.; Schillebeeckx, S.J.D. Digital Transformation, Sustainability, and Purpose in the Multinational Enterprise. J. World Bus. 2022, 57, 101326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Adouani, Y.; Khenissi, M.A. Investigating Computer Science Students’ Intentions towards the Use of an Online Educational Platform Using an Extended Technology Acceptance Model (e-TAM): An Empirical Study at a Public University in Tunisia. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Saksono, A.S.; Untoro, W. Consumer Perceived Ease of Use and Consumer Perceived Usefulness in Using the Shopee Application in Surakarta with Discount as a Moderation Variable. Eur. J. Bus. Manag. Res. 2023, 8, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kyriazos, T.A. Applied Psychometrics: Sample Size and Sample Power Considerations in Factor Analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in General. Psychology 2018, 9, 2207–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The proposed modified UTAUT-based model.
Figure 1. The proposed modified UTAUT-based model.
Logistics 08 00076 g001
Figure 2. Structural model and path coefficients.
Figure 2. Structural model and path coefficients.
Logistics 08 00076 g002
Table 1. The related literature on modified UTAUT models for testing the intention to adopt technology.
Table 1. The related literature on modified UTAUT models for testing the intention to adopt technology.
SourceYearTechnologyContextPEEESIFCPPHMPRTRPCCOPVATHBINAGGEEXVUEDFSIS
[30]2013Security as a service Germany, Austria, and Switzerland
[29]2016Cloud computing servicesGermany
[31]2019Big data in supply chain managementBrazil
[32]2020Enterprise resource planning (ERP)Developing and Asian countries
[33]2020Online technology during COVID-19 quarantine timeThailand
[34]2022M-paymentRetailers in Egypt
[35]2022Cashless payment system Thailand
[36]2022Digital health information systemChina
[37]2022E-marketplaceSmall businesses in India
[38]2022E-retail platformsSub-Saharan Africa
[39]2022FintechPort’s users in Ghana and sub-Saharan Africa
[26]2023Blockchain adoptionLogistics companies in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[40]2023Mobile pocket softwareA logistics company in Indonesia
[41]2023Fintech serviceJeddah, Saudi Arabia
[42]2023Imported spirit flash delivery applicationsChina
Note: UTAUT independent variables: PE = performance expectancy; EE = effort expectancy; SI = social influence; FC = facilitating condition. UTAUT moderating variables: AG = age; GE = gender; EX = experience; VU = voluntariness of use. Modified UTAUT independent variables: PP = perceived playfulness; HM = hedonic motivation; PC = privacy concern; PR = perceived risk; TR = trust; CO = perceived cost; PV = perceived vulnerability; AT = attitude; IN = innovativeness; HB = habit. Modified UTAUT moderating variables: ED = educational qualification; FS = firm size; IS = industrial sector.
Table 2. Measurement items.
Table 2. Measurement items.
ConstructsItemsSource
Performance Expectancy (PE)
PE1:
The use of an online platform for freight forwarding services will enhance our logistics performance compared to paper-based processes.
PE2:
Utilizing an online platform of freight forwarding services enables us to compete our logistics activities more rapidly.
PE3:
The use of an online platform for freight forwarding services improves the quality of our logistics activities.
PE4:
Using an online platform for freight forwarding services simplifies our logistics activities.
PE5:
Utilizing an online platform of freight forwarding services enhances our efficiency in logistics activities.
[3,15,69,70]
Effort Expectancy (EE)
EE1:
Interacting with an online platform for freight forwarding services would be clear and understandable.
EE2:
It would be easy for us to become proficient at using an online platform for freight forwarding services in our business.
EE3:
Learning to operate an online platform for freight forwarding services is straightforward for our staffs.
EE4:
An online platform for freight forwarding services is compatible with our company.
[15,69]
Social Influence (SI)
SI1:
The top management of our company believes that using an online platform for freight forwarding services is essential for digital transformation.
SI2:
Staff involved in freight booking believe that using an online platform for freight forwarding services should rely more on digitized documents.
SI3:
Using an online platform for freight forwarding services enhances commercial satisfaction for supply chain partners/customers.
[3,15,69]
Perceived Risk (PR)
PR1:
Utilizing digital or paperless documents through an online platform for freight forwarding services may result in the potential loss of important information of our company.
PR2:
Using an online platform for freight forwarding services may lead to a possible loss of time for our staffs compared to traditional processes.
PR3:
Using an online platform for freight forwarding services may result in a potential loss of performance accuracy.
PR4:
Implementing an online platform for freight forwarding services may incur the possible cost of training staff.
PR5:
Using an online platform for freight forwarding services may lead to a potential loss of cooperation between our company and the freight forwarder.
[34,35,55]
Facilitating Conditions (FCs)
FC1:
Our company possesses the necessary information technology facilities to effectively utilize an online platform for freight forwarding services.
FC2:
Our company has the requisite knowledge to effectively utilize an online platform for freight forwarding services.
FC3:
There is technical support available online to assist with any difficulties encountered in using an online platform for freight forwarding services.
[15,69]
Intention to Use (IU)
IU1:
I believe our company would adopt an online platform for freight forwarding services if it were available in the market.
IU2:
Our company is seriously considering the adoption of an online platform for freight forwarding services in the near future.
IU3:
Our company has a plan to utilize an online platform for freight forwarding services as a part of our digital transformation strategy.
[15,71]
Actual Use (AU)
AU1:
Our company is prepared to utilize an online platform for freight forwarding services as a significant step towards digital transformation.
AU2:
Our company uses an online platform for freight forwarding services to partially or fully replace traditional freight forwarding services.
AU3:
Our company use an online platform for freight forwarding services to manage logistics.
[15,32]
Table 3. Analysis of the demographic characteristics.
Table 3. Analysis of the demographic characteristics.
CategoriesDimensionsFrequency (n)Percentage (%)
PositionChief/managing director 29 7.3%
Import/export manager 173 43.3%
Logistics manager 142 35.5%
Other management levels or equivalent56 14.0%
GenerationGen X (over 43 years old) 61 15.3%
Gen Y or Millennials (30–43 years old) 262 65.5%
Gen Z (29 years old or less) 77 19.3%
Average usage shipmentLess than 5 TEUs a month10025.0%
5–20 TEUs a month14035.0%
21–50 TEUs a month8421.0%
More than 50 TEUs a month7619.0%
Firm sizeSmall (less than THB 50 million/year) 18145.3%
Medium (THB 51–300 million/year) 14235.5%
Large (more than THB 300 million/year) 7719.3%
Use of freight forwarding service
(past 3 months)
Yes400100.0%
No00%
Total400100%
Table 4. Descriptive statistics of variables (n = 400).
Table 4. Descriptive statistics of variables (n = 400).
ConstructsItemsMeanStandard DeviationSkewnessKurtosis
Performance Expectancy (PE)PE13.96 0.678 −0.291 0.115
PE23.97 0.705 −0.299 −0.061
PE33.96 0.778 −0.477 −0.037
PE43.95 0.810 −0.452 −0.256
PE53.99 0.771 −0.317 −0.461
Effort Expectancy (EE)EE14.06 0.786 −0.697 0.328
EE24.09 0.701 −0.298 −0.362
EE34.08 0.762 −0.742 0.607
EE44.03 0.665 −0.088 −0.565
Social Influence (SI)SI14.04 0.650 −0.477 0.852
SI23.99 0.761 −0.357 −0.109
SI34.03 0.791 −0.746 0.482
Perceived Risk (PR)PR13.61 0.851 −0.727 1.004
PR23.74 0.819 −0.080 −0.616
PR33.99 0.883 −0.415 −0.739
PR43.70 0.716 −0.379 0.076
PR53.64 0.733 −0.273 −0.124
Facilitating Condition (FC)FC13.99 0.629 −0.296 0.496
FC24.06 0.669 −0.366 0.251
FC33.96 0.747 −0.629 0.526
Intention to Use (IU)IU14.04 0.582 −0.156 0.529
IU24.05 0.694 −0.297 −0.184
IU34.10 0.623 −0.198 .037
Actual Use (AU)AU13.75 0.589 −0.691 0.927
AU23.75 0.588 −0.914 1.257
AU33.73 0.633 −1.013 1.217
Table 5. Determining the reliability and validity of the model.
Table 5. Determining the reliability and validity of the model.
ConstructsItemsFLAVECRCronbach’s α
Performance Expectancy (PE)PE10.7890.6510.9030.863
PE20.836
PE30.850
PE40.785
PE50.771
Effort Expectancy (EE)EE10.8670.6080.8590.782
EE20.790
EE30.844
EE40.585
Social Influence (SI)SI10.7920.6470.8450.723
SI20.749
SI30.867
Perceived Risk (PR)PR10.8510.6790.9140.877
PR20.770
PR30.779
PR40.875
PR50.841
Facilitating Condition (FC)FC10.7850.6390.8410.711
FC20.855
FC30.754
Intention to Use (IU)IU10.8100.7210.8860.801
IU20.819
IU30.915
Actual Use (AU)AU10.7890.7140.8820.799
AU20.866
AU30.877
Table 6. CFA statistics of model fit.
Table 6. CFA statistics of model fit.
Goodness-of-Fit
Indexes
Result ModelCut-Off for Good FitSource
CMIN/df3.306Good ≤ 3 and acceptable < 5[79,80]
RMSEA0.044Excellence < 0.01, good > 0.01–0.05,
medium > 0.05 to 0.08, and poor > 0.1
[81,82,83,84]
SRMR0.032<0.08[83]
NNFI or TLI0.7790 = poor fit
Close to 1 = very good fit
[73,85]
CFI0.8330 = poor fit
Close to 1 = very good fit
[83,86]
Table 7. Results of coefficient path analysis.
Table 7. Results of coefficient path analysis.
HypothesisPathβS.E.C.R.Result
H1Performance Expectancy (PE) → Intention to Use (IU)0.478 ***0.0783.925Supported
H2Effort Expectancy (EE) → Intention to Use (IU)0.168 *0.0342.442Supported
H3Social Influence (SI)→ Intention to Use (IU)0.262 ***0.0653.321Supported
H4Perceived Risk (PR) → Intention to Use (IU)−0.211 ***0.022−4.451Supported
H5Facilitating Conditions (FCs)→ Intention to Use (IU)0.458 ***0.0733.611Supported
H6Facilitating Conditions (FCs)→ Actual Use (AU)0.442 ***0.0594.579Supported
H7Intention to Use (IU)→ Actual Use (AU)0.663 ***0.1046.753Supported
Note: *** p < 0.001; * p < 0.05.
Table 8. Effects of moderating variables.
Table 8. Effects of moderating variables.
Firm SizeSME
Estimate
(n = 323)
Large Enterprise
Estimate
(n = 77)
z-ScoreModeration
H8aPerformance Expectancy (PE) → Intention to Use (IU)0.572 ***0.179−1.412No
H8bEffort Expectancy (EE) → Intention to Use (IU)0.154 *0.2420.314No
H8cSocial Influence (SI)→ Intention to Use (IU)0.201 *0.785 ***2.187 **Yes
H8dPerceived Risk (PR) → Intention to Use (IU)−0.234 ***−0.0531.623No
GenerationGeneration X
Estimate
(n = 61)
Generation Y and Z Estimate
(n = 339)
z-ScoreModeration
H9aPerformance Expectancy (PE) → Intention to Use (IU)0.8100.364 **−0.617No
H9bEffort Expectancy (EE) → Intention to Use (IU)−0.7770.198 **0.522No
H9cSocial Influence (SI)→ Intention to Use (IU)1.7010.177 *−0.732No
H9dPerceived Risk (PR) → Intention to Use (IU)0.518−0.252 ***−0.805No
Note: *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pinyanitikorn, N.; Atthirawong, W.; Chanpuypetch, W. Examining the Intention to Adopt an Online Platform for Freight Forwarding Services in Thailand: A Modified Unified Theory for Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model Approach. Logistics 2024, 8, 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics8030076

AMA Style

Pinyanitikorn N, Atthirawong W, Chanpuypetch W. Examining the Intention to Adopt an Online Platform for Freight Forwarding Services in Thailand: A Modified Unified Theory for Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model Approach. Logistics. 2024; 8(3):76. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics8030076

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pinyanitikorn, Nattakorn, Walailak Atthirawong, and Wirachchaya Chanpuypetch. 2024. "Examining the Intention to Adopt an Online Platform for Freight Forwarding Services in Thailand: A Modified Unified Theory for Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model Approach" Logistics 8, no. 3: 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics8030076

APA Style

Pinyanitikorn, N., Atthirawong, W., & Chanpuypetch, W. (2024). Examining the Intention to Adopt an Online Platform for Freight Forwarding Services in Thailand: A Modified Unified Theory for Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model Approach. Logistics, 8(3), 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics8030076

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop