Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Chemical Profiling and Evaluation of Antioxidant and Anti-Microbial Properties of Selected Commercial Essential Oils: A Comparative Study
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Anti-Inflammatory, Antioxidant, Antibiotic, and Cytotoxic Activities of Tanacetum vulgare L. Essential Oil and Its Constituents
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Medicines
Volume 4
Issue 2
10.3390/medicines4020035
medicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Enrichment of Animal Diets with Essential Oils—A Great Perspective on Improving Animal Performance and Quality Characteristics of the Derived Products

by
Panagiotis E. Simitzis
Department of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Faculty of Animal Science and Aquaculture, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, Athens 11855, Greece
Medicines 2017, 4(2), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines4020035
Submission received: 7 March 2017 / Revised: 30 May 2017 / Accepted: 1 June 2017 / Published: 2 June 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial, Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Essential Oils)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Food industry operates in a competitive market and is continually facing challenges to retain or even increase its market share. Consistent high-quality animal products are required to maintain consumer confidence and consumption. Enrichment of foods with bioactive compounds such as the essential oils appears to improve quality characteristics of the derived products and protects consumers against oxidation and bacterial spoilage effects. Synthetic additives are nowadays questioned due to their suspected carcinogenic potential, and therefore extensive research has been undertaken to identify safe and efficient alternatives. Aromatic plants and their respective essential oils belong to natural products and are generally used in pig, poultry, rabbit and ruminant nutrition. The inclusion of essential oils in livestock diets is nowadays becoming a common practice, since dietary supplementation has been proven a simple and convenient strategy to effectively inhibit the oxidative reactions or microbial spoilage at their localized sites. A wide range of essential oils contain bioactive compounds that have the potential to act as multifunctional feed supplements for animals including effects on growth performance, digestive system, pathogenic bacterial growth and lipid oxidation. However, further studies are needed to clarify their exact action and establish their regular use in animal production.

1. Introduction

The growing public concern over the potential health risks and environmental impacts caused by the excessive use of antibiotics as growth promoters in animal production has led to a ban of their dietary application within the European Union since 2006 with the intention to minimize the transmission and the proliferation of resistant bacteria via the food chain. However, industries involved in the animal production chain, including the primary producers, processors, distributors, and retailers are constantly searching for efficacious, safe and cost effective substances with similar properties. As a result, natural feed supplements derived from plants such as the essential oils (EOs) have been examined as alternatives in animal production for improving growing performance parameters and the quality characteristics of the derived products (meat, milk and eggs) [1].
EOs are quite complex mixtures constituted by several components, hence resistance is less likely to become a problem compared to a single synthetic compound. They mainly consist of terpenoids and a variety of low molecular weight aliphatic hydrocarbons (phenols, aromatic aldehydes, etc.) [2]. EOs have the potential of a possible therapeutic exploitation in a variety of conditions in animal production: they enhance production of digestive secretions, stimulate blood circulation, exert antioxidant properties, reduce levels of pathogenic bacteria counts, mitigate the levels of fermentation products (ammonia and biogenic amines), enhance precaecal nutrient digestion, improve the intestinal availability of essential nutrients for absorption and relieve animal from immune defense stress (less activity of the gut-associated lymphatic system) [3,4,5]. However, the mechanisms underlying these functions have not yet been thoroughly elucidated.
Factors such as geographical location, harvesting period, plant part used (seeds, leaf, root or bark) and method of isolation (cold expression, steam distillation, extraction with non-aqueous solvents, etc.) modify the chemical composition of the essential oil derived from the respective plant and may introduce substantial compositional differences between preparations from the same plant species. Source of variability is also the type and origin of the EO, the level of EO that is included in the animal diet, the composition and the digestibility of the basal diet, the level of feed intake and hygiene and environmental conditions [4,6].

2. Classification, Structure and Metabolism of EOs

Essential oils are volatile secondary metabolite fractions mainly extracted by steam distillation (but also cold pressing, fermentation and enfleurage) that have been extensively used in the cosmetic but also in the food industry. The most important active compounds of EOs are categorized into two chemical groups: (mono- and sesqui-)terpenoids and phenylpropanoids that originate from different precursors of the primary metabolism and are further synthesized through separate metabolic pathways. Terpenoids (limonene, thymol, carvacrol, linalool, etc.) are characterized as deriving from an isoprene unit, namely a basic structure of five carbons (C5H8) through the mevalonate pathway [7]. On the other hand, phenylpropanoids (cinnamaldehyde, eugenol, anethole, etc.) derive mainly from the phenylalanine that is synthetized by the shikimate metabolic pathway and are compounds with a chain of three carbons bound to an aromatic ring of six carbons [8].

3. Antimicrobial Effects of EOs

Control of animal products spoilage and pathogenic bacteria has been mainly achieved by the use of synthetic chemical agents in previous decades. The applications of these compounds are nowadays limited due to questions regarding their potent undesirable aspects such as carcinogenicity, acute toxicity, teratogenicity and slow degradation periods. Public awareness has therefore generated interest in the use of more naturally occurring compounds with a broad spectrum of antimicrobial properties that improve the quality characteristics and shelf life of animal products [9]. Essential oils belong to the category of natural antimicrobials and have already been extensively studied for their antimicrobial activities in food systems [2,10,11]. Specific circumstances in food systems such as lipid content, proteins, water activity, pH and enzymes can potentially diminish the efficacy of EOs [10].
EOs and their components are hydrophobic, a characteristic that enables them to partition lipids in the bacterial cell wall and mitochondria, leading to their accumulation in the lipidic layer and a disruption of the membrane integrity and ion transport processes, and resulting in disturbances of the cell osmotic pressure. In detail, a rapid dissipation of H+ and K+ ion gradients (proton motive sources) and depletion of the intracellular ATP pool is observed through the reduction of ATP synthesis and the increased hydrolysis. As a result, the trans-membrane electric potential in bacterial cell is reduced and the proton permeability of the membrane is increased slowing down bacterial growth. When the bacterial tolerance threshold is passed, the extensive loss of cell contents or critical molecules and ions leads to cell death [10]. Moreover, the existence of the hydroxyl group attached to a phenyl ring and its ability to release its proton are considered as crucial factors in disrupting normal ion transport across the cytoplasmic membrane and in inactivating microbial enzymes [10,12].
The above mechanisms of action are more effective against gram-positive bacteria because the hydrophobic compounds of EOs can directly interact with the cell membrane. On the other hand, the external cell wall of gram-negative bacteria is hydrophillic and as a result the hydrophobic (or lipophillic) compounds of EOs cannot easily penetrate into the bacterial membrane [10,13]. However, low molecular weight molecules of EOs can cross the bacterial cell wall by diffusion through membrane proteins or through the layer of lipopolysaccharides resulting in the disruption of membrane integrity [2].
Post mortem application of EOs in food systems contributes to the extension of shelf life by limiting the spoilage of foodborne pathogens [11]. However, during the last decade, dietary supplementation with EOs is constantly gaining ground since it is a simple and convenient way of introducing natural antimicrobials that enter the circulatory system, and are further distributed and retained in tissues. For example, dietary supplementation with the EOs derived from Oregano sp. could be used for improving the microbial hygiene of turkey breast fillets [14] or that of whole carcasses by reducing the microbial load of total viable bacteria and of specific pathogens as shown in broilers [15] and rabbits [16].

3.1. Effects of EOs on the Digestive System and the Gut Microbiota of Swine and Poultry

The effects of EOs dietary supplementation on gut microflora, morphology, enzyme activity and growth performance parameters have been already extensively examined (Table 1). In general, EOs appear to suppress harmful microorganisms, stimulate beneficial microbes such as Lactobacillus spp., regulate the activity of enzymes and protect gut villi, however without inducing significant positive effects on body weight gain. On the other hand, feed conversion ratio is generally improved. Lactobacilli are a group of bacteria that have long been known for their ability to activate the intestinal immune system and increase the resistance to diseases, in part through the release of low-molecular weight peptides which induce immune activation [17]. At the same time, the increased Lactobacilli counts contribute to the colonization resistance against pathogenic microbes by modifying the receptors used by them [18,19]. As shown by the literature, EOs display antimicrobial action against Escherichia coli [20], Clostridium perfringens [21] and Eimeria tenella [22] and prevent their adhesion, colonization and proliferation in the gut of broilers. The decreased numbers of pathogenic bacteria in the gut and the maintenance of a proper bacterial balance between the number of beneficial and harmful bacteria in the intestine appear to improve the ability of epithelial cells to regenerate villus and thus enhance intestinal absorptive capacity [23].
The gut is a pivotal organ system that mediates nutrient uptake and use by the animals. As presented in Table 1, essential oils beneficially affect the ecosystem of gastrointestinal microflora by controlling potential pathogens, alleviating the oxidative stress caused by them and stabilizing gut microbiota. Improved intestinal health further enhances availability of essential nutrients for absorption (increased villus length and gut surface) and animal growth performance parameters could therefore be improved [3,5,24]. Moreover, digestive secretions (saliva, bile, mucus, etc.) and enzyme (trypsin, amylase, lipase, etc.) activity are enhanced partially through the irritation of the epithelial tissues and the reduction in the depth of the crypts in the ileum, resulting in an increased gastric retention time of the ingested feed and a better nutrient absorption [25,26].
The exact reasons for the discrepancies shown in Table 1 are speculative but they could be attributed to different type and levels of essential oil, the variability in the concentration of the major bioactive compounds among the different parts (barks, leaves, flowers, etc.) of the plant used, the period of supplementation and the animal species. Moreover, the variability in the efficacy of essential oil on performance of farm animals could also be a result, among others, of the basal diet composition, feed intake level, hygienic standards and environmental conditions [4].

3.2. Effects of EOs on Rumen Fermentation

Ruminal microbial activity plays an important role in the synthesis of high-quality protein for ruminants. However, microbial fermentation could lead to significant energy and protein losses as methane and ammonia that are significant environmental pollutants. Essential oils could be used to manipulate ruminal metabolism and selectively inhibit rumen methanogenesis due to their antimicrobial properties. Methane (CH4) is a potent greenhouse gas with a global warming potential 21 times that of carbon dioxide (CO2) [93]. At the same time, enteric methane losses represent 2–12% of gross energy intake in ruminants depending on diet composition and feed intake [94]. It can be therefore concluded that the reduction of CH4 emissions through the application of EOs is beneficial both for the animals (improved feed efficiency and productivity) and for the environment (mitigation of greenhouse effects) [95]. Essential oils could also positively influence protein metabolism and reduce rumen ammonia levels and lead to a more efficient utilization of dietary nitrogen by inhibiting deamination, i.e., the breakdown of amino acids to NH3, possibly through the selective limitation of the activity of a specific group of bacteria within the rumen, the “hyper-ammonia-producing bacteria” (Prevotella spp., Ruminobacter amylophilus, etc.) at the level of attachment and colonization [96,97].
Several EOs (thyme, oregano, cinnamon, garlic, etc.) have already been used with the intention to reduce CH4 production. At low doses, ruminal fermentation is not affected by essential oils, whereas at high doses these compounds inhibit the target microbial species as well as most rumen microbes [98]. As it has been demonstrated in in vitro studies, although the effects of EOs are diet (forage:concentrate ratio), pH (more intense action at low pH values) and time (adaptation period) dependent, mitigation of methane emissions occurs at high doses (>300 mg/L of culture fluid) and is frequently associated with a decrease in total volatile fatty acids concentration and feed digestion. As a result, although EOs in high doses could exert positive in vitro effects on rumen fermentation, these doses result in negative implications on feed palatability, digestion and animal productivity when applied in vivo. At the same time, the levels of EOs that have elicited favorable fermentation responses in vitro are far too high for in vivo application due to their possible toxic effects and high cost [99]. As shown in Table 2, no effects on feed intake, average daily gain and total volatile fatty acids concentrations and rates (i.e., acetate to propionate ratio) are generally observed after the dietary supplementation of ruminants with EOs or their main components as single compounds or mixtures. Since no significant differences in feed intake and rumen characteristics are found, it can be concluded that generally no effects on rumen methanogenesis are induced. A possible explanation is the ability of rumen microbes to adapt and degrade EOs components [95].

4. Antioxidant Effects of EOs

Oxidation of lipids and free radicals’ production are natural processes that destroy the membrane structure, disturb transport processes and cause losses in the function of the cell organelles. Lipids and especially phospholipids present in cell membranes are particularly susceptible to oxidative damage that is positively correlated with the degree of unsaturation of the fatty acids. Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) are responsible for the maintenance of physiologically important cell membrane properties including fluidity and permeability. The peroxy radicals react with PUFAs and form hydroperoxides (ROOH), which later decompose to produce the volatile non-radical aromatic compounds (aldehydes, alkanes, conjugated dienes, etc.) that adversely affect lipids, pigments, proteins, carbohydrates vitamins and the overall quality of animal products by causing loss of nutritive value and limiting shelf-life [124].
Although synthetic antioxidants (butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), tert-butylhydroquinone (TBHQ), gallates, etc.) are traditionally used with the intention to delay, retard or prevent the negative effects of lipid peroxidation by scavenging chain-carrying peroxyl radicals or diminishing the formation of initiating lipid radicals, the demand for natural antioxidants has recently been increased. During the last decades interest in employing antioxidants from natural sources to increase the shelf life of foods is considerably enhanced due to consumer preference for natural occurring ingredients and concerns about the possible toxic effects of synthetic antioxidants.
Animal diet plays a crucial role in the inhibition of free radicals production in the organism and the derived products. The nutritional prevention of oxidizing stress and its implications suggests the optimization of the antioxidant levels in the feed. As illustrated in Table 3, quality of animal products is generally improved after the incorporation of oregano or rosemary EO into the diets of animals. EOs are rich sources of natural antioxidants, such as the phenolic compounds and due their high redox properties and chemical structure have the ability to neutralize free radicals, chelate transitional metals and quench singlet and triplet oxygen by delocalization or decomposition of peroxides [125,126]. As a result, they affect lipid metabolism in animal tissues by exerting beneficial effects on the antioxidative enzymes activity (superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase) and by preventing the production of reactive oxygen species and off-flavors deriving from the oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids [127]. However, depending on type and dosage, EOs can act as prooxidants by disrupting the integrity of cell membrane and organelles, with further cytotoxic effects on living cells [128]. Dietary supplementation with EOs is therefore a simple and convenient strategy to uniformly introduce natural antioxidants into phospholipid membranes, where they may effectively inhibit the oxidative reactions by preventing the formation of radicals, by scavenging them, or by promoting their decomposition at their localized sites and appears as a more effective way of retarding lipid oxidation of animal products compared to post mortem addition [129,130].

5. Conclusions

The increasing pressure on the livestock industry to stop the use of antibiotics as growth promoters has initiated new research to find safe and efficient alternatives. The wide range of bioactive compounds included in the essential oils could boost their use as multifunctional feed supplements for animals. EOs contain several components that have the potential to positively manipulate gut microbiota and rumen fermentation, inhibit pathogenic bacterial growth, prevent tissue oxidation and, as a result, improve growth performance and products’ quality of livestock. However, their effectiveness in animal production has not yet been proven to be consistent and conclusive and some issues need to be addressed before their commercial application. For example, an optimal dose of essential oils application, depending on their type, should be addressed, since their use at high concentrations could induce cytotoxic effects on living cells. Although EOs are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) for use in the food and feed industry and the accumulation of their components in the body is unlikely due to their rapid elimination (glucuronides by the kidneys) or exhalation (carbon dioxide), no analytical methods suitable for their identification and quantification (traceability, toxicity, possible residues, etc.) have yet been developed. At the same time, the beneficial effects of EOs dietary supplementation should be such as to justify the additional cost of their application. Finally, despite the fact that the understanding of EOs mode of action is a prerequisite for their regular application in animal production, our knowledge regarding their activities in animal (as well as in human) organism is still rather limited and there is a strong need for information regarding their absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion. A further clarification of the above inquiries would therefore be beneficial for establishing EOs regular application in animal production.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Simitzis, P.E.; Deligeorgis, S.G. The effects of natural antioxidants dietary supplementation on the properties of farm animal products. In Animal Feed: Types, Nutrition, Safety; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 155–168. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dorman, H.J.D.; Deans, S.G. Antimicrobial agents from plants: Antibacterial activity of plant volatile oils. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 88, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Windisch, W.; Schedle, K.; Plitzner, C.; Kroismayr, A. Use of phytogenic products as feed additives for swine and poultry. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86 (Suppl. 14), E140–E148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Brenes, A.; Roura, E. Essential oils in poultry nutrition: Main effects and modes of action. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2010, 158, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zeng, Z.; Zhang, S.; Wang, H.; Piao, X. Essential oil and aromatic plants as feed additives in non-ruminant nutrition: A review. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2015, 6, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Dudareva, N.; Pichersky, E.; Gershenzon, J. Biochemistry of plant volatiles. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135, 1893–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zwenger, S.; Basu, C. Plant terpenoids: Applications and future potentials. Biotechnol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2008, 3, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  8. De Cássia da Silveira e Sá, R.; Andrade, L.N.; Dos Reis Barreto de Oliveira, R.; De Sousa, D.P. A review on anti-inflammatory activity of phenylpropanoids found in essential oils. Molecules 2014, 19, 1459–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Faleiro, M.L. The mode of antibacterial action of essential oils. In Science Against Microbial Pathogens: Communicating Current Research and Technological Advances 2; Mendez-Vilas, A., Ed.; Formatex: Badajoz, Spain, 2011; pp. 1143–1156. [Google Scholar]
  10. Burt, S. Essential oils: Their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods—A review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 94, 223–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Calo, J.R.; Crandall, P.G.; O’Bryan, C.A.; Ricke, S.C. Essential oils as antimicrobials in food systems—A review. Food Control 2015, 54, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ultee, A.; Bennik, M.H.J.; Moezelaar, R. The phenolic hydroxyl group of carvacrol is essential for action against the food-borne pathogen Bacillus cereus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 1561–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cimanga, K.; Kambu, K.; Tona, L.; Apers, S.; De Bruyne, T.; Hermans, N.; Vlietinck, A.J. Correlation between chemical composition and antibacterial activity of essential oils of some aromatic medicinal plants growing in the Democratic Republic of Congo. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2002, 79, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Govaris, A.; Botsoglou, E.; Florou-Paneri, P.; Moulas, A.; Papageorgiou, G. Dietary supplementation of oregano essential oil and a-tocopheryl acetate on microbial growth and lipid oxidation of turkey breast fillets during storage. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2005, 4, 969–975. [Google Scholar]
  15. Aksit, M.; Goksoy, E.; Kok, F.; Ozdemir, D.; Ozdogan, M. The impacts of organic acid and essential oil supplementations to diets on the microbiological quality of chicken carcasses. Arch. Geflugelkd. 2006, 70, 168–173. [Google Scholar]
  16. Soultos, N.; Tzikas, Z.; Christaki, E.; Papageorgiou, K.; Steris, V. The effect of dietary oregano essential oil on microbial growth of rabbit carcasses during refrigerated storage. Meat Sci. 2009, 81, 474–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Muir, W.I.; Bryden, W.L.; Husband, A.J. Immunity, vaccination and the avian intestinal tract. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2000, 24, 325–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Adil, S.; Magray, S.N. Impact and manipulation of gut microflora in poultry: A review. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2012, 11, 873–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rinttila, T.; Apajalahti, J. Intestinal microbiota and metabolites—Implications for broiler chicken health and performance. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2013, 22, 647–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jang, I.S.; Ko, Y.H.; Kang, S.Y.; Lee, C.Y. Effect of a commercial essential oil on growth performance, digestive enzyme activity and intestinal microflora population in broiler chickens. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2007, 134, 304–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jamroz, D.; Wertelecki, T.; Houszka, M.; Kamel, C. Influence of diet type on the inclusion of plant origin active substances on morphological and histochemical characteristics of the stomach and jejunum walls in chicken. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2006, 90, 255–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Giannenas, I.A.; Florou-Paneri, P.; Papazahariadou, M.; Botsoglou, N.A.; Christaki, E.; Spais, A.B. Effect of diet supplementation with ground oregano on performance of broiler chickens challenged with Eimeria tenella. Arch. Geflugelkd. 2004, 68, 247–252. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mourão, J.L.; Pinheiro, V.; Alves, A.; Guedes, C.M.; Pinto, L.; Saavedra, M.J.; Spring, P.; Kocher, A. Effect of mannan oligosaccharides on the performance, intestinal morphology and caecal fermentation of fattening rabbits. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2006, 126, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Franz, C.; Baser, K.H.C.; Windisch, W. Essential oils and aromatic plants in animal feeding—A European perspective. A review. Flavour Fragr. J. 2010, 25, 327–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Platel, K.; Srinivasan, K. Digestive stimulant action of spices: A myth or reality? Indian J. Med. Res. 2004, 119, 167–179. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Jamroz, D.; Wiliczkiewicz, A.; Wertelecki, T.; Orda, J.; Skorupińska, J. Use of active substances of plant origin in chicken diets based on maize and locally grown cereals. Br. Poult. Sci. 2005, 46, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Allen, P.C.; Lydon, J.; Danforth, H.D. Effects of components of Artemisia annua on coccidia infections in chickens. Poult. Sci. 1997, 76, 1156–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Abildgaard, L.; Hojberg, O.; Schramm, A.; Balle, K.M.; Engberg, R.M. The effect of feeding a commercial essential oil product on Clostridium perfringens numbers in the intestine of broiler chickens measured by real-time PCR targeting the α-toxin-encoding gene (plc). Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2010, 157, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Abudabos, A.M.; Alyemni, A.H. Effects of the essential oil blend CRINA® Poultry in feed on broiler performance and gut microbiology. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 12, e83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Abudabos, A.M.; Alyemni, A.H. The effect of feeding a commercial essential oil product to broilers challenged with Clostridium perfringens. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2013, 7, 4539–4545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Alali, W.Q.; Hofacre, C.L.; Mathis, G.F.; Faltys, G. Effect of essential oil compound on shedding and colonization of Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2013, 92, 836–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Amerah, A.M.; Péron, A.; Zaefarian, F.; Ravindran, V. Influence of whole wheat inclusion and a blend of essential oils on the performance, nutrient utilisation, digestive tract development and ileal microbiota profile of broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 2011, 52, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Amerah, A.M.; Mathis, G.; Hofacre, C.L. Effect of xylanase and a blend of essential oils on performance and Salmonella colonization of broiler chickens challenged with Salmonella Heidelberg. Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 943–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Arczewska-Wlosek, A.; Swiatkiewicz, S. The effect of a dietary herbal extract blend on the performance of broilers challenged with Eimeria oocysts. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2012, 21, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bozkurt, M.; Selek, N.; Küçükyilmaz, K.; Eren, H.; Güven, E.; Çatli, A.U.; Çinar, M. Effects of dietary supplementation with a herbal extract on the performance of broilers infected with a mixture of Eimeria species. Br. Poult. Sci. 2012, 53, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Cho, J.H.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, I.H. Effects of phytogenic feed additive on growth performance, digestibility, blood metabolites, intestinal microbiota, meat color and relative organ weight after oral challenge with Clostridium perfringens in broilers. Livest. Sci. 2014, 160, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Christaki, E.; Florou-Paneri, P.; Giannenas, I.; Papazahariadou, M.; Botsoglou, N.A.; Spais, A.B. Effect of a mixture of herbal extracts on broiler chickens infected with Eimeria tenella. Anim. Res. 2004, 53, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hong, J.C.; Steiner, T.; Aufy, A.; Lien, T.F. Effects of supplemental essential oil on growth performance, lipid metabolites and immunity, intestinal characteristics, microbiota and carcass traits in broilers. Livest. Sci. 2012, 144, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Isabel, B.; Santos, Y. Effects of dietary organic acids and essential oils on growth performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2009, 18, 472–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jamroz, D.; Orda, J.; Kamel, C.; Wiliczkiewicz, A.; Wertelecki, T.; Skorupinska, J. The influence of phytogenic extracts on performance, nutrient digestibility, carcass characteristics, and gut microbial status in broiler chickens. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2003, 12, 583–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Khattak, F.; Ronchi, A.; Castelli, P.; Sparks, N. Effects of natural blend of essential oil on growth performance, blood biochemistry, caecal morphology, and carcass quality of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Küçükyilmaz, K.; Bozkurt, M.; Selek, N.; Güven, E.; Eren, H.; Atasever, A.; Bintaş, E.; Çatlı, A.U.; Çınar, M. Effects of vaccination against coccidiosis, with and without a specific herbal essential oil blend, on performance, oocyst excretion and serum IBD titers of broilers reared on litter. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 11, e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mitsch, P.; Zitterl-Eglseer, K.; Köhler, B.; Gabler, C.; Losa, R.; Zimpernik, I. The effect of two different blends of essential oil components on the proliferation of Clostridium perfringens in the intestines of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2004, 83, 669–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Oviedo-Rondón, E.O.; Hume, M.E.; Hernandez, C.; Clemente-Hernández, S. Intestinal microbial ecology of broilers vaccinated and challenged with mixed Eimeria species, and supplemented with essential oil blends. Poult. Sci. 2006, 85, 854–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Oviedo-Rondón, E.O.; Clemente-Hernández, S.; Salvador, F.; Williams, P.; Losa, R.; Stephan, F. Essential oils on mixed coccidia vaccination and infection in broilers. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2006, 5, 723–730. [Google Scholar]
  46. Oviedo-Rondón, E.O.; Hume, M.E.; Barbosa, N.A.; Sakomura, N.K.; Weber, G.; Wilson, J.W. Ileal and caecal microbial populations in broilers given specific essential oil blends and probiotics in two consecutive grow-outs. Avian Biol. Res. 2010, 3, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tiihonen, K.; Kettunen, H.; Bento, M.H.L.; Saarinen, M.; Lahtinen, S.; Ouwehand, A.C.; Schulze, H.; Rautonen, N. The effect of feeding essential oils on broiler performance and gut microbiota. Br. Poult. Sci. 2010, 51, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Orndorff, B.W.; Novak, C.L.; Pierson, F.W.; Caldwell, D.J.; McElroy, A.P. Comparison of prophylactic or therapeutic dietary administration of capsaicin for reduction of Salmonella in broiler chickens. Avian Dis. 2005, 49, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Wang, M.L.; Suo, X.; Gu, J.H.; Zhang, W.W.; Fang, Q.; Wang, X. Influence of grape seed proanthocyanidin extract in broiler chickens: Effect on chicken coccidiosis and antioxidant status. Poult. Sci. 2008, 87, 2273–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Guo, F.C.; Williams, B.A.; Kwakkel, R.P.; Li, H.S.; Li, X.P.; Luo, J.Y.; Li, W.K.; Verstegen, M.W.A. Effects of mushroom and herb polysaccharides, as alternatives for an antibiotic, on the caecal microbial ecosystem in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2004, 83, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Guo, F.C.; Kwakkel, R.P.; Williams, B.A.; Li, W.K.; Li, H.S.; Luo, J.Y.; Li, X.P.; Wei, Y.X.; Yan, Z.T.; Verstegen, M.W.A. Effects of mushroom and herb polysaccharides, as alternatives for an antibiotic, on growth performance of broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 2004, 45, 684–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Willis, W.L.; Isikhuemhen, O.S.; Ibrahim, S.A. Performance assessment of broiler chickens given mushroom extract alone or in combination with probiotics. Poult. Sci. 2007, 86, 1856–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Alp, M.; Midilli, M.; Kocabağlı, N.; Yılmaz, H.; Turan, N.; Gargılı, A.; Acar, N. The effects of dietary oregano essential oil on live performance, carcass yield, serum immunoglobulin G level, and oocyst count in broilers. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2012, 21, 630–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Basmacioğlu Malayoğlu, H.; Baysal, Ş.; Misirlioğlu, Z.; Polat, M.; Yilmaz, H.; Turan, N. Effects of oregano essential oil with or without feed enzymes on growth performance, digestive enzyme, nutrient digestibility, lipid metabolism and immune response of broilers fed on wheat–soybean meal diets. Br. Poult. Sci. 2010, 51, 67–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bozkurt, M.; Ege, G.; Aysul, N.; Akşit, H.; Tüzün, A.E.; Küçükyılmaz, K.; Borum, A.E.; Uygun, M.; Aksit, D.; Aypak, S.; et al. Effect of anticoccidial monensin with oregano essential oil on broilers experimentally challenged with mixed Eimeria spp. Poult. Sci. 2016, 95, 1858–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Giannenas, I.; Florou-Paneri, P.; Papazahariadou, M.; Christaki, E.; Botsoglou, N.A.; Spais, A.B. Effect of dietary supplementation with oregano essential oil on performance of broilers after experimental infection with Eimeria tenella. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2003, 57, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Horošová, K.; Bujňáková, D.; Kmet, V. Effect of oregano essential oil on chicken lactobacilli and E. coli. Folia Microbiol. 2006, 51, 278–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kırkpınar, F.; Ünlü, H.B.; Özdemir, G. Effects of oregano and garlic essential oils on performance, carcass, organ and blood characteristics and intestinal microflora of broilers. Livest. Sci. 2011, 137, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mohiti-Asli, M.; Ghanaatparast-Rashti, M. Dietary oregano essential oil alleviates experimentally induced coccidiosis in broilers. Prev. Vet. Med. 2015, 120, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Roofchaee, A.; Irani, M.; Ebrahimzadeh, M.A.; Akbari, M.R. Effect of dietary oregano (Origanum vulgare L.) essential oil on growth performance, caecal microflora and serum antioxidant activity of broiler chickens. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 6177–6183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Silva, M.A.D.; Pessotti, B.M.D.S.; Zanini, S.F.; Colnago, G.L.; Rodrigues, M.R.A.; Nunes, L.D.C.; Zanini, M.S.; Martins, I.V.F. Intestinal mucosa structure of broiler chickens infected experimentally with Eimeria tenella and treated with essential oil of oregano. Ciênc. Rural 2009, 39, 1471–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tsinas, A.; Giannenas, I.; Voidarou, C.; Tzora, A.; Skoufos, J. Effects of an oregano based dietary supplement on performance of broiler chickens experimentally infected with Eimeria acervulina and Eimeria maxima. J. Poult. Sci. 2011, 48, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Waldenstedt, L. Effect of vaccination against coccidiosis in combination with an antibacterial oregano (Origanum vulgare) compound in organic broiler production. Acta Agric. Scand. A Anim. Sci. 2003, 53, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Emami, N.K.; Samie, A.; Rahmani, H.R.; Ruiz-Feria, C.A. The effect of peppermint essential oil and fructooligosaccharides, as alternatives to virginiamycin, on growth performance, digestibility, gut morphology and immune response of male broilers. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2012, 175, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Vidanarachchi, J.K.; Mikkelsen, L.L.; Constantinoiu, C.C.; Choct, M.; Iji, P.A. Natural plant extracts and prebiotic compounds as alternatives to antibiotics in broiler chicken diets in a necrotic enteritis challenge model. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2013, 53, 1247–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Youn, H.J.; Noh, J.W. Screening of the anticoccidial effects of herb extracts against Eimeria tenella. Vet. Parasitol. 2001, 96, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cross, D.E.; McDevitt, R.M.; Hillman, K.; Acamovic, T. The effect of herbs and their associated essential oils on performance, dietary digestibility and gut microflora in chickens from 7 to 28 days of age. Br. Poult. Sci. 2007, 48, 496–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Cross, D.E.; McDevitt, R.M.; Acamovic, T. Herbs, thyme essential oil and condensed tannin extracts as dietary supplements for broilers, and their effects on performance, digestibility, volatile fatty acids and organoleptic properties. Br. Poult. Sci. 2011, 52, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Placha, I.; Takacova, J.; Ryzner, M.; Cobanova, K.; Laukova, A.; Strompfova, V.; Venglovska, K.; Faix, S. Effect of thyme essential oil and selenium on intestine integrity and antioxidant status of broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 2014, 55, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Lee, K.W.; Everts, H.; Kappert, H.J.; Frehner, M.; Losa, R.; Beynen, A.C. Effects of dietary essential oil components on growth performance, digestive enzymes and lipid metabolism in female broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 2003, 44, 450–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Naidoo, V.; McGaw, L.J.; Bisschop, S.P.; Duncan, N.; Eloff, J.N. The value of plant extracts with antioxidant activity in attenuating coccidiosis in broiler chickens. Vet. Parasitol. 2008, 153, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Denli, M.; Okan, F.; Uluocak, A.N. Effect of dietary supplementation of herb essential oils on the growth performance, carcass and intestinal characteristics of quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 34, 174–179. [Google Scholar]
  73. Khaksar, V.; Van Krimpen, M.; Hashemipour, H.; Pilevar, M. Effects of thyme essential oil on performance, some blood parameters and ileal microflora of Japanese quail. J. Poult. Sci. 2012, 49, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Abousekken, M.S.; Azazy, M.F.; El-Khtam, A.O.; Zaglool, W.K. Impact of Artemisia Annua L. Supplementation on Growth Performance and Control of Coccidiosis in rabbit. J. Am. Sci. 2015, 11, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Placha, I.; Chrastinova, L.; Laukova, A.; Cobanova, K.; Takacova, J.; Strompfova, V.; Chrenkova, M.; Formelova, Z.; Faix, S. Effect of thyme oil on small intestine integrity and antioxidant status, phagocytic activity and gastrointestinal microbiota in rabbits. Acta Vet. Hung. 2013, 61, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Giannenas, I.; Papaneophytou, C.P.; Tsalie, E.; Pappas, I.; Triantafillou, E.; Tontis, D.; Kontopidis, G.A. Dietary supplementation of benzoic acid and essential oil compounds affects buffering capacity of the feeds, performance of turkey poults and their antioxidant status, pH in the digestive tract, intestinal microbiota and morphology. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 27, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Yan, L.; Wang, J.P.; Kim, H.J.; Meng, Q.W.; Ao, X.; Hong, S.M.; Kim, I.H. Influence of essential oil supplementation and diets with different nutrient densities on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, meat quality and faecal noxious gas content in grower–finisher pigs. Livest. Sci. 2010, 128, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yan, L.; Meng, Q.W.; Kim, I.H. The effect of an herb extract mixture on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics and faecal noxious gas content in growing pigs. Livest. Sci. 2011, 141, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ahmed, S.T.; Hossain, M.E.; Kim, G.M.; Hwang, J.A.; Ji, H.; Yang, C.J. Effects of Resveratrol and Essential Oils on Growth Performance, Immunity, Digestibility and Faecal Microbial Shedding in Challenged Piglets. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 26, 683–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Li, S.Y.; Ru, Y.J.; Liu, M.; Xu, B.; Péron, A.; Shi, X.G. The effect of essential oils on performance, immunity and gut microbial population in weaner pigs. Livest. Sci. 2012, 145, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Li, P.; Piao, X.; Ru, Y.; Han, X.; Xue, L.; Zhang, H. Effects of adding essential oil to the diet of weaned pigs on performance, nutrient utilization, immune response and intestinal health. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 25, 1617–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Maenner, K.; Vahjen, W.; Simon, O. Studies on the effects of essential-oil-based feed additives on performance, ileal nutrient digestibility, and selected bacterial groups in the gastrointestinal tract of piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 89, 2106–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Manzanilla, E.G.; Perez, J.F.; Martin, M.; Kamel, C.; Baucells, F.; Gasa, J. Effect of plant extracts and formic acid on the intestinal equilibrium of early-weaned pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 82, 3210–3218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Manzanilla, E.G.; Nofrarias, M.; Anguita, M.; Castillo, M.; Perez, J.F.; Martin-Orue, S.M.; Kamel, C.; Gasa, J. Effects of butyrate, avilamycin, and a plant extract combination on the intestinal equilibrium of early-weaned pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 84, 2743–2751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Manzanilla, E.G.; Pérez, J.F.; Martín, M.; Blandón, J.C.; Baucells, F.; Kamel, C.; Gasa, J. Dietary protein modifies effect of plant extracts in the intestinal ecosystem of the pig at weaning. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 87, 2029–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Muhl, A.; Liebert, F. Growth and parameters of microflora in intestinal and faecal samples of piglets due to application of a phytogenic feed additive. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2007, 91, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Muhl, A.; Liebert, F. No impact of a phytogenic feed additive on digestion and unspecific immune reaction in piglets. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2007, 91, 426–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Namkung, H.; Gong, M.L.J.; Yu, H.; Cottrill, M.; de Lange, C. Impact of feeding blends of organic acids and herbal extracts on growth performance, gut microbiota and digestive function in newly weaned pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 84, 697–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Yan, L.; Meng, Q.W.; Kim, I.H. Effect of an herb extract mixture on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, and faecal microbial shedding in weanling pigs. Livest. Sci. 2012, 145, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zeng, Z.; Xu, X.; Zhang, Q.; Li, P.; Zhao, P.; Li, Q.; Liu, J.; Piao, X. Effects of essential oil supplementation of a low-energy diet on performance, intestinal morphology and microflora, immune properties and antioxidant activities in weaned pigs. Anim. Sci. J. 2015, 86, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Zhang, S.; Jung, J.H.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, B.Y.; Kim, I.H. Influences of phytoncide supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profiles, diarrhea scores and faecal microflora shedding in weaning pigs. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 25, 1309–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Huang, C.W.; Lee, T.T.; Shih, Y.C.; Yu, B. Effects of dietary supplementation of Chinese medicinal herbs on polymorphonuclear neutrophil immune activity and small intestinal morphology in weanling pigs. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2012, 96, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Bodas, R.; Prieto, N.; García-González, R.; Andrés, S.; Giráldez, F.J.; López, S. Manipulation of rumen fermentation and methane production with plant secondary metabolites. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2012, 176, 78–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Boadi, D.; Benchaar, C.; Chiquette, J.; Massé, D. Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: Update review. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 84, 319–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Benchaar, C.; Greathead, H. Essential oils and opportunities to mitigate enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 166, 338–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. McIntosh, F.M.; Williams, P.; Losa, R.; Wallace, R.J.; Beever, D.A.; Newbold, C.J. Effects of essential oils on ruminal microorganisms and their protein metabolism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 5011–5014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Calsamiglia, S.; Busquet, M.; Cardozo, P.W.; Castillejos, L.; Ferret, A. Invited review: Essential oils as modifiers of rumen microbial fermentation. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90, 2580–2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Benchaar, C.; Calsamiglia, S.; Chaves, A.V.; Fraser, G.R.; Colombatto, D.; McAllister, T.A.; Beauchemin, K.A. A review of plant-derived essential oils in ruminant nutrition and production. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2008, 145, 209–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Beauchemin, K.A.; McAllister, T.A.; McGinn, S.M. Dietary mitigation of enteric methane from cattle. CAB Rev. Perspect. Agric. Vet. Sci. Nutr. Nat. Resour. 2009, 4, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Benchaar, C.; Lettat, A.; Hassanat, F.; Yang, W.Z.; Forster, R.J.; Petit, H.V.; Chouinard, P.Y. Eugenol for dairy cows fed low or high concentrate diets: Effects on digestion, ruminal fermentation characteristics, rumen microbial populations and milk fatty acid profile. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2012, 178, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Tager, L.R.; Krause, K.M. Effects of essential oils on rumen fermentation, milk production, and feeding behavior in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94, 2455–2464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Yang, W.Z.; Benchaar, C.; Ametaj, B.N.; Chaves, A.V.; He, M.L.; McAllister, T.A. Effects of garlic and juniper berry essential oils on ruminal fermentation and on the site and extent of digestion in lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90, 5671–5681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Hristov, A.N.; Lee, C.; Cassidy, T.; Heyler, K.; Tekippe, J.A.; Varga, G.A.; Corl, B.; Brandt, R.C. Effect of Origanum vulgare L. leaves on rumen fermentation, production, and milk fatty acid composition in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96, 1189–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Tekippe, J.A.; Hristov, A.N.; Heyler, K.S.; Cassidy, T.W.; Zheljazkov, V.D.; Ferreira, J.F.S.; Karnati, S.K.; Varga, G.A. Rumen fermentation and production effects of Origanum vulgare L. leaves in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94, 5065–5079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Benchaar, C.; Petit, H.V.; Berthiaume, R.; Whyte, T.D.; Chouinard, P.Y. Effects of addition of essential oils and monensin premix on digestion, ruminal fermentation, milk production, and milk composition in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89, 4352–4364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Benchaar, C.; Petit, H.V.; Berthiaume, R.; Ouellet, D.R.; Chiquette, J.; Chouinard, P.Y. Effects of essential oils on digestion, ruminal fermentation, rumen microbial populations, milk production, and milk composition in dairy cows fed alfalfa silage or corn silage. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90, 886–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kung, L.; Williams, P.; Schmidt, R.J.; Hu, W. A blend of essential plant oils used as an additive to alter silage fermentation or used as a feed additive for lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91, 4793–4800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Spanghero, M.; Robinson, P.H.; Zanfi, C.; Fabbro, E. Effect of increasing doses of a microencapsulated blend of essential oils on performance of lactating primiparous dairy cows. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2009, 153, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Santos, M.B.; Robinson, P.H.; Williams, P.; Losa, R. Effects of addition of an essential oil complex to the diet of lactating dairy cows on whole tract digestion of nutrients and productive performance. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2010, 157, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Meyer, N.F.; Erickson, G.E.; Klopfenstein, T.J.; Greenquist, M.A.; Luebbe, M.K.; Williams, P.; Engstrom, M.A. Effect of essential oils, tylosin, and monensin on finishing steer performance, carcass characteristics, liver abscesses, ruminal fermentation, and digestibility. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 87, 2346–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Vakili, A.R.; Khorrami, B.; Mesgaran, M.D.; Parand, E. The effects of Thyme and Cinnamon essential oils on performance, rumen fermentation and blood metabolites in Holstein calves consuming high concentrate diet. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 26, 935–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Fandiño, I.; Calsamiglia, S.; Ferret, A.; Blanch, M. Anise and capsicum as alternatives to monensin to modify rumen fermentation in beef heifers fed a high concentrate diet. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2008, 145, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Valero, M.V.; Prado, R.M.D.; Zawadzki, F.; Eiras, C.E.; Madrona, G.S.; Prado, I.N.D. Propolis and essential oils additives in the diets improved animal performance and feed efficiency of bulls finished in feedlot. Acta Sci. Anim. Sci. 2014, 36, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Kongmun, P.; Wanapat, M.; Pakdee, P.; Navanukraw, C.; Yu, Z. Manipulation of rumen fermentation and ecology of swamp buffalo by coconut oil and garlic powder supplementation. Livest. Sci. 2011, 135, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Thao, N.T.; Wanapat, M.; Cherdthong, A.; Kang, S. Effects of eucalyptus crude oils supplementation on rumen fermentation, microorganism and nutrient digestibility in swamp buffaloes. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 27, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Chaves, A.V.; Stanford, K.; Gibson, L.L.; McAllister, T.A.; Benchaar, C. Effects of carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde on intake, rumen fermentation, growth performance, and carcass characteristics of growing lambs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2008, 145, 396–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Chaves, A.V.; Stanford, K.; Dugan, M.E.R.; Gibson, L.L.; McAllister, T.A.; Van Herk, F.; Benchaar, C. Effects of cinnamaldehyde, garlic and juniper berry essential oils on rumen fermentation, blood metabolites, growth performance, and carcass characteristics of growing lambs. Livest. Sci. 2008, 117, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Bhatt, R.S.; Soren, N.M.; Tripathi, M.K.; Karim, S.A. Effects of different levels of coconut oil supplementation on performance, digestibility, rumen fermentation and carcass traits of Malpura lambs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 164, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Giannenas, I.; Skoufos, J.; Giannakopoulos, C.; Wiemann, M.; Gortzi, O.; Lalas, S.; Kyriazakis, I. Effects of essential oils on milk production, milk composition, and rumen microbiota in Chios dairy ewes. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94, 5569–5577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Klevenhusen, F.; Zeitz, J.O.; Duval, S.; Kreuzer, M.; Soliva, C.R. Garlic oil and its principal component diallyl disulfide fail to mitigate methane, but improve digestibility in sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 166, 356–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Lin, B.; Lu, Y.; Salem, A.Z.M.; Wang, J.H.; Liang, Q.; Liu, J.X. Effects of essential oil combinations on sheep ruminal fermentation and digestibility of a diet with fumarate included. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2013, 184, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Ma, T.; Chen, D.D.; Tu, Y.; Zhang, N.F.; Si, B.W.; Deng, K.D.; Diao, Q.Y. Effect of dietary supplementation with resveratrol on nutrient digestibility, methanogenesis and ruminal microbial flora in sheep. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2015, 99, 676–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Malecky, M.; Broudiscou, L.P.; Schmidely, P. Effects of two levels of monoterpene blend on rumen fermentation, terpene and nutrient flows in the duodenum and milk production in dairy goats. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2009, 154, 24–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Pisoschi, A.M.; Pop, A. The role of antioxidants in the chemistry of oxidative stress: A review. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 97, 55–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Rice-Evans, C.A.; Miller, N.J.; Bolwell, P.G.; Bramley, P.M.; Pridham, J.B. The relative antioxidant activities of plant-derived polyphenolic flavonoids. Free Radic. Res. 1995, 22, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Zheng, W.; Wang, S.Y. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds in selected herbs. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 5165–5170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Miguel, M.G. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of essential oils: A short review. Molecules 2010, 15, 9252–9287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Bakkali, F.; Averbeck, S.; Averbeck, D.; Idaomar, M. Biological effects of essential oils—A review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 446–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Govaris, A.; Botsoglou, N.; Papageorgiou, G.; Botsoglou, E.; Ambrosiadis, I. Dietary versus post-mortem use of oregano oil and/or α-tocopherol in turkeys to inhibit development of lipid oxidation in meat during refrigerated storage. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2004, 55, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Decker, E.A.; Park, Y. Healthier meat products as functional foods. Meat Sci. 2010, 86, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Florou-Paneri, P.; Nikolakakis, I.; Giannenas, I.; Koidis, A.; Botsoglou, E.; Dotas, V.; Mitsopoulos, I. Hen performance and egg quality as affected by dietary oregano essential oil and a-tocopheryl acetate supplementation. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2005, 4, 449–454. [Google Scholar]
  132. Avila-Ramos, F.; Pro-Martinez, A.; Sosa-Montes, E.; Cuca-Garcia, J.M.; Becerril-Perez, C.M.; Figueroa-Velasco, J.L.; Narciso-Gaytan, C. Effects of dietary oregano essential oil and vitamin E on the lipid oxidation stability of cooked chicken breast meat. Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 505–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Botsoglou, N.A.; Florou-Paneri, P.; Christaki, E.; Fletouris, D.J.; Spais, A.B. Effect of dietary oregano essential oil on performance of chickens and on iron-induced lipid oxidation of breast, thigh and abdominal fat tissues. Br. Poult. Sci. 2002, 43, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Botsoglou, N.A.; Christaki, E.; Fletouris, D.J.; Florou-Paneri, P.; Spais, A.B. The effect of dietary oregano essential oil on lipid oxidation in raw and cooked chicken during refrigerated storage. Meat Sci. 2002, 62, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Botsoglou, N.A.; Fletouris, D.J.; Florou-Paneri, P.; Christaki, E.; Spais, A.B. Inhibition of lipid oxidation in long-term frozen stored chicken meat by dietary oregano essential oil and alpha-tocopheryl acetate supplementation. Food Res. Int. 2003, 36, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Kirkpinar, F.; Ünlü, H.B.; Serdaroğlu, M.; Turp, G.Y. Effects of dietary oregano and garlic essential oils on carcass characteristics, meat composition, colour, pH and sensory quality of broiler meat. Br. Poult. Sci. 2014, 55, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Marcincak, S.; Cabadaj, R.; Popelka, P.; Soltysova, L. Antioxidative effect of oregano supplemented to broilers on oxidative stability of poultry meat. Slov. Vet. Res. 2008, 45, 61–66. [Google Scholar]
  138. Simitzis, P.E.; Deligeorgis, S.G.; Bizelis, J.A.; Dardamani, A.; Theodosiou, I.; Fegeros, K. Effect of dietary oregano oil supplementation on lamb meat characteristics. Meat Sci. 2008, 79, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Simitzis, P.E.; Symeon, G.K.; Charismiadou, M.A.; Bizelis, J.A.; Deligeorgis, S.G. The effects of dietary oregano oil supplementation on pig meat characteristics. Meat Sci. 2010, 84, 670–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Janz, J.A.M.; Morel, P.C.H.; Wilkinson, B.H.P.; Purchas, R.W. Preliminary investigation of the effects of low-level dietary inclusion of fragrant essential oils and oleoresins on pig performance and pork quality. Meat Sci. 2007, 75, 350–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Botsoglou, N.A.; Florou-Paneri, P.; Christaki, E.; Giannenas, I.; Spais, A.B. Performance of rabbits and oxidative stability of muscle tissues as affected by dietary supplementation with oregano essential oil. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2004, 58, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Botsoglou, N.A.; Grigoropoulou, S.H.; Botsoglou, E.; Govaris, A.; Papageorgiou, G. The effects of dietary oregano essential oil and a-tocopheryl acetate on lipid oxidation in raw and cooked turkey during refrigerated storage. Meat Sci. 2003, 65, 1193–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Florou-Paneri, P.; Galatos, G.; Govaris, A.; Botsoglou, D.; Giannenas, I.; Ambrosiadis, I. Oregano herb versus oregano essential oil as feed supplements to increase the oxidative stability of turkey meat. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2005, 4, 866–871. [Google Scholar]
  144. Simitzis, P.E.; Bizelis, J.A.; Fegeros, K.; Deligeorgis, S.G. Effect of dietary oregano oil supplementation on sheep milk characteristics. Anim. Sci. Rev. 2007, 37, 69–78. [Google Scholar]
  145. Yesilbag, D.; Gezen, S.S.; Biricik, H.; Meral, Y. Effects of dietary rosemary and oregano volatile oil mixture on quail performance, egg traits and egg oxidative stability. Br. Poult. Sci. 2013, 54, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. O’Grady, M.N.; Maher, M.; Troy, D.J.; Moloney, A.P.; Kerry, J.P. An assessment of dietary supplementation with tea catechins and rosemary extract on the quality of fresh beef. Meat Sci. 2006, 73, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Vasta, V.; Aoudi, D.; Bronga, D.M.R.; Scerra, M.; Luciano, G.; Priolo, A.; Ben Salem, H. Effect of the dietary supplementation of essential oils from rosemary and artemisia on muscle fatty acids and volatile compound profiles in Barbarine lambs. Meat Sci. 2013, 95, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Serrano, R.; Jordan, M.J.; Banon, S. Use of dietary rosemary extract in ewe and lamb to extend the shelf life of raw and cooked meat. Small Rumin. Res. 2014, 116, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Smeti, S.; Atti, N.; Mahouachi, M.; Munoz, F. Use of dietary rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) essential oils to increase the shelf life of Barbarine light lamb meat. Small Rumin. Res. 2013, 113, 340–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Aoudi, D.; Luciano, G.; Vasta, V.; Nasri, S.; Brogna, D.M.R.; Abidi, S.; Priolo, A.; Ben Salem, H. The antioxidant status and oxidative stability of muscle from lambs receiving oral administration of Artemisia herba alba and Rosmarinus officinalis essential oils. Meat Sci. 2014, 97, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Ortuno, J.; Serrano, R.; Jordan, M.J.; Banon, S. Shelf life of meat from lambs given essential oil-free rosemary extract containing carnosic acid plus carnosol at 200 or 400 mg kg−1. Meat Sci. 2014, 96, 1452–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Lopez-Bote, C.J.; Gray, J.I.; Gomaa, E.A.; Flegal, C.J. Effect of dietary administration of oil extracts from rosemary and sage on lipid oxidation in broiler meat. Br. Poult. Sci. 1998, 39, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Yesilbag, D.; Eren, M.; Agel, H.; Kovanlikaya, A.; Balci, F. Effects of dietary rosemary, rosemary volatile oil and vitamin E on broiler performance, meat quality and serum SOD activity. Br. Poult. Sci. 2011, 52, 472–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Haak, L.; Raes, K.; Van Dyck, S.; De Smet, S. Effect of dietary rosemary and a-tocopheryl acetate on the oxidative stability of raw and cooked pork following oxidized linseed oil administration. Meat Sci. 2008, 78, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Chiofalo, V.; Liotta, L.; Fiumano, R.; Riolo, E.B.; Chiofalo, B. Influence of dietary supplementation of Rosmarinus officinalis L. on performances of dairy ewes organically managed. Small Rumin. Res. 2012, 104, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Effects of essential oils or their components on gut microflora, morphology, enzyme activity and growth performance parameters in monogastric animals.
Table 1. Effects of essential oils or their components on gut microflora, morphology, enzyme activity and growth performance parameters in monogastric animals.
Essential Oil or ComponentLevelAnimalEffectsReference
Artemisinin17 ppmBroilersReduction of oocyst output and lesion scores attributable to Eimeria tenella.[27]
BEO (thymol, eugenol and piperine)100–200 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on intestinal numbers of C. perfringens, GP and FCR. Reduction of FBW.[28]
BEO (thymol, eugenol and piperine)100 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on FI, BWG, FCR, CT and ileal bacterial count (C. perfringens and Gram− bacilli). Increase of ileum length and ileal villi height.[29,30]
BEO (carvacrol, thymol, eucalyptol, lemon)125–500 mg/kgBroilersImprovement of BWG and FCR (125 or 250 mg/kg). Reduction of Salmonella Heidelberg colonization in crops (500 mg/kg). No effect on Salmonella Heidelberg caecal or faecal counts.[31]
BEO (cinnamaldehyde and thymol)100 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on ADG, FI, gut morphology and ileal bacterial count. Improvement of FCR and apparent ileal nitrogen digestibility.[32]
BEO (cinnamaldehyde and thymol)100 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on FI. Improvement of BWG and FCR. Reduction of Salmonella-positive caecal samples.[33]
BEO (garlic, sage, echinacea, thyme, oregano)1 g/kgBroilersNo effect on BWG, FI, FCR, CT and lesion score. Reduction of oocyst counts 6–14 days post infection.[34]
BEO (oregano, laurel leaf and lavender)50 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on BWG, FI, FCR, intestinal length and caecal weight. Reduction of faecal Eimeria oocyst output.[35]
BEO (oregano, cinnamaldehyde, carvacol, yucca extract)250 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on BWG and FI. Improvement of FCR, ATTD of DM and gross energy. Reduction of lesion score and C. perfringens and E. coli intestinal counts.[36]
BEO (Agrimonia eupatoria, Echinacea angustifolia, Ribes nigrum and Cinchona succirubra extracts)0.5–1.0 g/kgBroilersNo effect on caecal lesion score. Improvement of BWG and FCR. Reduction of Eimeria tenella oocysts count and bloody diarrhea intensity.[37]
BEO (oregano, anis and citrus peel)125 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on BWG, FI, intestinal pH values, caecal TVFA levels and total ileum microbiota counts. Improvement of FCR. Reduction of ileum ammonia concentration.[38]
BEO (clove and cinnamon)100 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on FBW, ADG, FCR and CT.[39]
BEO (capsaicin, cinnamaldehyde, carvacrol)150–300 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on FBW, ADG, FCR, CT and ileal ND. Reduction of rectal E. coli and Clostridium perfringens counts.[40]
BEO (capsaicin, cinnamaldehyde, carvacrol)100 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on FBW, CT and ileal ND. Improvement of FCR. Increase of LAB counts and lipase activity in pancreas and intestine wall. Reduction of intestinal E. coli and Clostridium perfringens counts.[22]
BEO (capsicum oleoresin, cinnamaldehyde, carvacrol)100 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on FBW. Improvement of FCR. Increase of mucus secretion intensity and accumulation inside cells of the gastrointestinal mucosa. Reduction of intestinal E. coli and Clostridium perfringens counts.[19]
BEO (thymol, eugenol and piperine)50 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on FBW, ADG, FI, FCR and LAB counts. Increase of pancreatic trypsin, pancreatic alpha-amylase and intestinal maltase activity. Reduction of E. coli counts in ileo-caecal digesta.[21]
BEO (basil, caraway, laurel, lemon, oregano, sage, tea and thyme)30 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on FI. Improvement of FBW, ADG, FCR and CT. Increase of caecal villus surface area.[41]
BEO (carvacrol, 1,8-cineole, camphor, thymol, oregano EO, laurel leaf EO and lavender EO)75 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on CT. Negative effect on FCR. Reduction of FBW, ADG, FI, caecum weight, intestinal length and faecal Eimeria spp. oocyst excretion.[42]
BEO1 (thymol, eugenol and piperine) or BEO2 (thymol, carvacrol, eugenol and piperine)100 mg/kgBroilersReduction of intestinal Clostridium perfringens counts.[43]
BEO (thymol, eugenol and piperine)100 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on BWG, FI, FCR, lesion scores and Eimeria sp. oocyst counts. Modulation of intestinal microbial communities.[44,45]
BEO (thymol, eugenol and piperine)300 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on BWG, FI, FCR and caecal microbial population. Slight modulation of intestinal microbial population.[46]
BEO (thymol, cinnamaldehyde)15 + 5 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on FI, FCR and caecal bacterial (LAB, E. coli, Clostridium perfringens) counts. Increase of BWG.[47]
Capsaicin5–20 mg/kgBroilersReduction of Salmonella Typhimurium counts.[48]
Grape Seed Proanthocyanidin Extract12 mg/kgBroilersIncrease of BWG. Reduction of lesion scores. Restoration of the antioxidant/oxidant system balance after the parasite infection.[49]
Mushroom (Lentinus edodes or Tremella fuciformis) or herb (Astragalus membranaceus Radix) polysaccharide extracts2 g/kgBroilersNo effect on BWG, FI, FCR. Increase of bifidobacteria and LAB counts and reduction of Bacteroides spp. and E. coli counts.[50,51]
Mushroom (Lentinus edodes) extract100 g/L waterBroilersNo effect on BWG, FI, FCR and CT. Promotion of bifidobacteria growth.[52]
Oregano EO300 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on FBW and CT. Improvement of FCR. Reduction of FI and excreta oocyst counts.[53]
Oregano EO250–500 g/kgBroilersNo effect on BWG, FI, FCR, digesta pH, weight and height of the intestinal parts and lipase and amylase activity. Increase of chymotrypsin activity and CPD.[54]
Oregano EO12–24 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on BWG and FI. Improvement of FCR, intestinal morphological development and enzymatic activities (amylase).[55]
Oregano EO300 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on FI. Improvement of BWG and FCR. Reduction of lesion score and Eimeria tenella oocyst counts.[56]
Oregano EO5–10 μL/kgBroilersIntense bacteridical action against lactobacilli and E. coli in faecal samples.[57]
Oregano or garlic EO300 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on FI, FCR, CT, ileal Streptococcus, LAB and CB counts. Oregano EO results in reduced FBW (no effect of garlic EO). Reduction of ileal Clostridium perfringens counts.[58]
Oregano EO500 mg/kgBroilersImprovement of BWG and FCR. Reduction of coccidiosis lesion scores and faecal oocyst counts.[59]
Oregano EO600 mg/kgBroilersImprovement of BWG and FCR. No effect on LAB counts, but decrease of E. coli counts.[60]
Oregano EO0.5–1 g/kgBroilersNo effect on intestinal villous height and crypt depth. Reduction of Eimeria tenella oocyst counts.[61]
Oregano EO300–600 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on BWG and FI. Improvement of FCR. Reduction of lesion score and faecal Eimeria sp. oocyst counts.[62]
Oregano EO330 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on FCR and lesion scores. Increase of FBW, FI and reduction of caecal Clostridium perfringens counts.[63]
Peppermint EO400 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on BW, ADG, FI and FCR, faecal DMD and CPD and intestinal morphology.[64]
Renga renga lily or Acacia extract10 g/kgBroilersNo effect on BWG, FI, FCR, intestinal morphology and ileal CB and Clostridium perfringens counts. Increase of ileal LAB counts.[65]
Sophora flavescens extract6–30 g/L waterBroilersIncrease of BWG. Reduction of lesion scores and faecal Eimeria tenella oocyst counts.[66]
Thyme EO1 g/kgBroilersNo effect on FCR, AME, ATTD and intestinal microflora populations. Increase of BWG and FI.[67]
Thyme EO1 g/kgBroilersNo effect on ADG, FI, FCR, DMD, CPD and TVFA. Reduction of caecal isobutyric+ isovaleric levels.[68]
Thyme EO0.5 g/kgBroilersNo effect on caecal and large-intestinal bacterial counts. Improvement of intestinal barrier integrity and antioxidant status.[69]
Thymol or cinnamaldehyde or BEO (thymol, eugenol and piperine)100 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on FBW, ADG, FI, FCR, ileal CPD and activity of digestive enzymes in intestinal contents and pancreatic tissue.[70]
Tulbaghia violacea extract35 mg/kgBroilersNo effect on BWG. Improvement of FCR and reduction of Eimeria sp. oocyst counts.[71]
Thyme EO60 mg/kgQuailsNo effect on FI, intestinal parameters and CT. Improvement of BWG and FCR. Reduction of abdominal fat levels.[72]
Thyme EO1 g/kgQuailsNo effect on FI and FCR. Increase of FBW, carcass weight ileal LAB counts and reduction of ileal E. coli counts.[73]
Artemisia annua L. extract2.5–5.0 mL/kgRabbitsReduction of faecal oocytes and caecal TBC. Improvement of FCR and RGR.[74]
Thyme EO0.5 g/kgRabbitsNo effect on faecal and caecal bacterial counts. Improvement of intestinal integrity and antioxidant status.[75]
BEO (thymol, eugenol, piperine)30 mg/kgTurkeysImprovement BWG, FCR and antioxidant status. Increase of caecal LAB counts and reduction of caecal CB counts.[76]
BEO (thyme, rosemary, oregano)100 mg/kgGrower-finisher pigsImprovement of ADG, FCR, GED, CPD (grower period) and ADG (grower-finisher period). Reduction of ammonia excretion.[77]
BEO (buckwheat, thyme, curcuma, black pepper and ginger)250–500 mg/kgGrower pigsNo effect on FCR. Increase of BWG, FI and reduction of faecal noxious gas (ammonia and hydrogen sulfide) content.[78]
BEO (oregano, anise, orange peel, and chicory EOs)125 mg/kgWeaner pigsNo effect on ADG, FI, FCR. Improvement of DM and N digestibility. Reduction of faecal Salmonella typhimurium and E. coli counts. Increase of faecal Lactobacillus spp. count.[79]
BEO (thymol and cinnamaldehyde)0.1–0.15 mg/kgWeaner pigsImprovement of ADG and FCR. Increase of FI and faecal LAB counts. Reduction of diarrhea occurrence and faecal E. coli counts.[80]
BEO (thymol and cinnamaldehyde)100 mg/kgWeaner pigsImprovement of ADG, DMD, CPD and faecal score. Increase of villus height to crypt depth ratio in the jejunum, caecal LAB counts and reduction of caecal and rectal E. coli counts.[81]
BEO (peppermint, anise and clove)300 mg/kgWeaner pigsNo effect on BWG, FI and gastrointestinal microbiota. Improvement of FCR, CPD and amino acids digestibility.[82]
BEO (oregano, cinnamon and Mexican pepper)150–300 mg/kgWeaner pigsNo effect on BWG, FI, FCR and ATTD. Increase of gastric retention time and pH, lactobacilli:enterobacteria ratio and decrease of ileum total microbial count.[83]
BEO (oregano, cinnamon and Mexican pepper)300 mg/kgWeaner pigsNo effect on BWG, FI, FCR, ATTD, intestinal pH and gastrointestinal morphology.[84]
BEO (oregano, cinnamon and Mexican pepper)200 mg/kgWeaner pigsNo effect on BWG, FI and FCR. Increase of ileal lactobacilli:enterobacteria ratio and decrease of TVFA production in the cecum.[85]
BEO (carvacrol and thymol)500–1500 mg/kgWeaner pigsNo effect on BWG, FI, FCR, praecaecal digestibility, enzyme activities, faecal microbial counts and intestinal microflora.[86,87]
BEO (cinnamon, thyme and oregano extract)750 mg/kgWeaner pigsNo effect on BWG, FI, FCR, intestinal morphology and LAB counts. Reduction of CB counts.[88]
BEO (buckwheat, thyme, curcuma, black pepper and ginger)250 mg/kgWeaner pigsNo effect on ADG, FI, FCR and caecal LAB counts. Improvement of CPD and DMD and reduction of faecal E. coli counts.[89]
BEO (thymol, cinnamaldehyde)250 mg/kgWeaner pigsNo effect on FI, caecal E. coli and LAB counts. Improvement of ADG, FCR, DMD, CPD and GED. Increase of villus height (jejunum) and reduction of rectal E. coli counts.[90]
Phytoncide2 g/kgWeaner pigsNo effect on ADG, FI, FCR, faecal E. coli counts and diarrhea scores. Improvement of DMD and increase of faecal LAB counts.[91]
Powder of medicinal herbs (Panax ginseng, Dioscoreaceae opposite, Atractylodes macrocephala, Glycyrrhiza uralensis, Ziziphus jujube and Platycodon grandiflorum)1–3 g/kgWeaner pigsNo effect on FI, BWG and FCR. Increase of DMD, CPD, GED, villous height and ileal and caecal LAB counts and reduction of caecal CB counts.[92]
ADG: average daily gain; AME: apparent metabolisable energy; ATTD: apparent total tract digestibility; BEO: blend of essential oils; BWG: body weight gain; CB: coliform bacteria; CT: carcass traits; CPD: crude protein digestibility; DM: dry matter; DMD: dry matter digestibility; DT: digestive tract; EO: essential oil; FBW: final body weight; FCR: feed conversion ratio; FI: feed intake; ND: nutrients digestibility; GED: gross energy digestibility; GP: growth performance; LAB: lactic acid bacteria; RGR: relative growth rate; TBC: total bacterial counts; TVFA: total volatile fatty acids.
Table
Table 2. Effects of essential oils or their components on rumen characteristics and performance parameters.
Table 2. Effects of essential oils or their components on rumen characteristics and performance parameters.
Essential Oil or ComponentLevelAnimalEffectsReference
Eugenol50 mg/kg DMDairy cowsNo effect on DMI, ND, RP and MY.[100]
Cinnamaldehyde and eugenol85 & 140 mg/day, respectivelyDairy cowsNo effect on DMI, FB, VFA concentration, NH3, A:P ratio, ruminal pH, ND and MY.[101]
Cinnamaldehyde and eugenol1.7 & 2.8 g/day, respectivelyDairy cowsNo effect on DMI, FB, VFA concentration, NH3, A:P ratio, ruminal pH, ND and MY.[101]
Garlic EO5 g/dayDairy cowsNo effect on DMI, ruminal pH, VFA concentration, NH3 and MY. Improvement of FD in rumen.[102]
Juniper berry EO2 g/dayDairy cowsNo effect on DMI, ruminal pH, VFA concentration, NH3 and MY. Improvement of FD in rumen.[102]
Oregano leaves250, 500 or 750 g/dayDairy cowsNo effect on ND, VFA concentration, ruminal pH and MY. Dose-dependent decrease of DMI and MP.[103]
Oregano leaves500 g/dayDairy cowsNo effect on DMI, ND, VFA concentration, ruminal pH and MY. Decrease of MP.[104]
MEO2 g/dayDairy cowsNo effect on FI, ND, VFA concentration and MY. Increase of ruminal pH.[105]
MEO750 mg/dayDairy cowsNo effect on FI, ND, RP and MY. Increase of ruminal pH.[106]
MEO1.2 g/dayDairy cowsNo effect on BW, BCS and VFA concentration. Increase of DMI and MY.[107]
Blend of oregano, cinnamon, thyme and orange peel EOs0.32, 0.64 or 0.96 g/dayDairy cowsNo effect on DMI, ND and MY.[108]
Mixture of eugenol, geranyl acetate and coriander oil1 g/dayDairy cowsNo effect on DMI, ND and MY. Decrease of BCS.[109]
MEO1 g/daySteersNo effect on DMI, ADG, CC, ND, VFA concentration and ruminal pH.[110]
Cinnamon EO5 g/dayCalvesNo effect on DMI, ADG, VFA concentration and ruminal pH. Decrease of A:P ratio.[111]
Thyme EO5 g/dayCalvesNo effect on DMI, ADG, VFA concentration and ruminal pH. Decrease of A:P ratio.[111]
Anise extract500 mg/dayBeef heifersReduction of VFA concentration and RP (A:P ratio, NH3).[112]
Cashew and castor EOs3 g/dayBullsNo effect on DMI, ND and CC. Improved ADG, final BW and FE.[113]
Coconut oil7%Swamp buffaloesNegative effect on DMI, VFA concentration, A:P ratio and MP. No effect on ruminal pH, NH3 and ND.[114]
Eucalyptus EO2 mL/daySwamp buffaloesNo effect on DMI, ND, ruminal pH, VFA concentration. Decrease of MP.[115]
Carvacrol200 mg/kg DMLambsReduction of ruminal pH and increase of VFA concentration. No effect on other RP (A:P ratio, NH3), DMI, AVG, CC and MC.[116]
Cinnamaldehyde200 mg/kg DMLambsReduction of ruminal pH, increase of VFA concentration. No effect on other RP (A:P ratio, NH3) DMI, AVG, CC and MC.[116]
Cinnamaldehyde200 mg/kg DMLambsNo effect on RP, DMI, CC and MC. Positive effect on AVG.[117]
Coconut oil25, 50 or 75 g/kg of CFLambsNo effect on ADG and CC. Decrease of DMI.[118]
Garlic EO200 mg/kg DMLambsNo effect on RP, DMI, AVG, CC and MC.[117]
Juniper berry EO200 mg/kg DMLambsNo effect on RP, DMI, CC and MC. Positive effect on AVG.[117]
MEO50, 100 or 150 mg/kg DMDairy ewesNo effect on DMI and ruminal pH. Positive dose-dependent effect on MY.[119]
Garlic EO5 g/kg DMSheepNo effect on DMI and MP.[120]
Mixture of clove, oregano, cinnamon, and lemon EOs1 g/daySheepNo effect on DMI, ND and ruminal pH. Decrease of VFA concentration, A:P ratio and RPD.[121]
Mixture of eugenol, carvacrol, citral and cinnamaldehyde1 g/daySheepNo effect on DMI, ND and ruminal pH. Decrease of VFA concentration, A:P ratio and RPD.[121]
Resveratrol0.25 g/daySheepNo effect on DMI, ruminal pH, NH3 and VFA concentration. Positive effect on ND. Decrease of MP and A:P ratio.[122]
Mixture of linalool, p-cymene, alpha-pinene & beta-pinene0.043 or 0.43 g/kg DMDairy goatsNo effect on DMI, ND, VFA concentration, A:P ratio and MY.[123]
ADG: average daily gain, A:P ratio: acetate: propionate ratio, BCS: body condition score, BW: body weight, CC: carcass characteristics, CF: concentrated feed, DM: dry matter, DMI: dry matter intake, FB: feeding behavior, FD: feed digestibility, FE: feed efficiency, FI: feed intake, MC: meat characteristics, MEO: EOs components mixture (thymol, eugenol, vanillin, guaiacol and limonene), MP: methane production, MY: milk yield, ND: nutrients digestibility, NH3: ammonia, RP: rumen parameters, RPD: ruminal protein digestibility, VFA: volatile fatty acids.
Table
Table 3. Dietary supplementation of animal diets with the two most common essential oils derived from the Greek flora (oregano and rosemary) and effects on the quality of the derived products.
Table 3. Dietary supplementation of animal diets with the two most common essential oils derived from the Greek flora (oregano and rosemary) and effects on the quality of the derived products.
Essential OilMajor Antioxidant CompoundsLevelProductEffectReference
Oreganop-cymene, gamma-terpinene, beta-Caryophyllene, borneol, carvacrol, thymol100–200 mg/kgEgg+[131]
100 mg/kgChicken Meat+[132]
50–100 mg/kgChicken Meat+[133,134,135]
300 mg/kgChicken MeatNS[136]
500 mg/kgChicken Meat+[137]
1.0 mL/kgLamb Meat+[138]
0.25–1.0 mL/kgPork MeatNS[139]
500 mg/kgPork MeatNS[140]
100–200 mg/kgRabbit Meat+[141]
100 mg/kgTurkey Meat+[14,142]
200 mg/kgTurkey Meat+[129,143]
1 mL/kgSheep MilkNS[144]
RosemaryCarnosic acid, carnosol, rosmanol, rosmarinic acid200 mg/kgQuail egg+[145]
1.0 g/kgBeef+[146]
400 mg/kgLamb MeatNS[147]
0.6 g/kgLamb MeatNS[148,149]
0.4 g/kgLamb Meat+[150,151]
500 mg/kgChicken Meat+[152]
100–200 mg/kgChicken Meat+[153]
40 mg/kgPork Meat+[154]
0.6–1.2 g/daySheep Milk+[155]
+: positive effect, NS: no effect.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Simitzis, P.E. Enrichment of Animal Diets with Essential Oils—A Great Perspective on Improving Animal Performance and Quality Characteristics of the Derived Products. Medicines 2017, 4, 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines4020035

AMA Style

Simitzis PE. Enrichment of Animal Diets with Essential Oils—A Great Perspective on Improving Animal Performance and Quality Characteristics of the Derived Products. Medicines. 2017; 4(2):35. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines4020035

Chicago/Turabian Style

Simitzis, Panagiotis E. 2017. "Enrichment of Animal Diets with Essential Oils—A Great Perspective on Improving Animal Performance and Quality Characteristics of the Derived Products" Medicines 4, no. 2: 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines4020035

APA Style

Simitzis, P. E. (2017). Enrichment of Animal Diets with Essential Oils—A Great Perspective on Improving Animal Performance and Quality Characteristics of the Derived Products. Medicines, 4(2), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines4020035

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop