Forecasting the Competition of International Standardization Preoccupation
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsDear Authors,
While this study is important, I would suggest the following changes and modification that could contribute in the quality enhancement of your article.
1- Please make sure you identify a literature gap and that you are adding new knowledge in the this regard;
2- You have to address some research questions;
3- What is your methodology? Can you clarify it?
4- In the discussion session you have to treat your findings for each research question;
5- Do not use figures in the conclusion session.
Best regards,
Author Response
1- Please make sure you identify a literature gap and that you are adding new knowledge in the this regard; Edited. See page 1 to 2, 8,9,10,14,15
2- You have to address some research questions; Edited. See page 1 to 2, 8,9,10,14,15
3- What is your methodology? Can you clarify it?
Answer - Yes, it is. It is a case study.
4- In the discussion session you have to treat your findings for each research question; Answer : Edited. See page 1 to 2, 8,9,10,14,15
5- Do not use figures in the conclusion session
Answer - In conclusion, the picture was deleted and moved chapter 4.
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for Authors
Comments to the authors
The paper, "Measures to resolve non-tariff barriers through the spread of 2 international mutual recognition agreements under the WTO/FTA TBT system – Focusing on the Digital Transformation Economy and the G2 Standard War for Hegemony," is a significant research article in the international economic system. However, I have some crucial comments:
-The paper's name is broad and somewhat fuzzy to understand. Please be concise, making it meaningful.
- The research objective is not clarified adequately in this manuscript.
- In the introductory section, a short description of the methods and their rationale must be mentioned.
- The research contribution in the existing literature is not written at all. Please write the research contribution.
- The research methodology of this article is not mentioned.
- Theory and discussion parts should be aligned.
- Result-based concluding observation is a dire need.
- Putting a diagram is not appropriate for a research article.
- Some paragraphs in the manuscript are significantly smaller, which is not suitable for a scientific research piece.
- The write-up is essay-typed. Please try to write scientifically.
- Before publishing this paper, please check the English wherever necessary.
Author Response
The paper, "Measures to resolve non-tariff barriers through the spread of 2 international mutual recognition agreements under the WTO/FTA TBT system – Focusing on the Digital Transformation Economy and the G2 Standard War for Hegemony," is a significant research article in the international economic system. However, I have some crucial comments:
-The paper's name is broad and somewhat fuzzy to understand. Please be concise, making it meaningful.
Answer : Forecasting and competition of international standardization preoccupation
- The research objective is not clarified adequately in this manuscript.
Answer : Edited. See page 1. The purpose of this study is to specifically analyze the competition for international standardization in the era of digital transformation, and to specify future predictions.
- In the introductory section, a short description of the methods and their rationale must be mentioned.
Answer : Edited. See a all pages
- The research contribution in the existing literature is not written at all. Please write the research contribution.
Answer : Edited. See page 1 to 2.
- The research methodology of this article is not mentioned.
Answer : The research methodology is a case study.
- Theory and discussion parts should be aligned.
Answer : Edited. See page 8,9,10,14,15.
- Result-based concluding observation is a dire need.
Answer : Edited. See page 14 to 15.
- Putting a diagram is not appropriate for a research article.
Answer : Edited. See page 4,6,8 pages.
- Some paragraphs in the manuscript are significantly smaller, which is not suitable for a scientific research piece.
Answer : Edited all pages.
- The write-up is essay-typed. Please try to write scientifically.
Answer : Edited. See a all pages
- Before publishing this paper, please check the English wherever necessary.
Answer : Edited. See a all pages
Reviewer 3 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsGood day, DEAR! Recommended
Author Response
Thank you kindly and All the best !
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe authors have taken into the consideration the comments and suggestions, thus I suggest the publication of this article.
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsDear Authors, Thank you very much for your revise. Have a nice time!
