Next Article in Journal
“Never Trust to General Impressions, My Boy, but Concentrate Yourself upon Details”: An Unusual and Challenging Presentation of Pheochromocytoma
Next Article in Special Issue
New Insights into the Development and Morphogenesis of the Cardiac Purkinje Fiber Network: Linking Architecture and Function
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion versus Non-Vitamin-K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulation in High-Risk Atrial Fibrillation: An Update
Previous Article in Special Issue
Regulation of Cardiac Conduction and Arrhythmias by Ankyrin/Spectrin-Based Macromolecular Complexes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCDD
Volume 8
Issue 6
10.3390/jcdd8060070
jcdd-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

How Cardiac Embryology Translates into Clinical Arrhythmias

by
Mathilde R. Rivaud
1,
Michiel Blok
2,
Monique R. M. Jongbloed
2,3 and
Bastiaan J. Boukens
1,4,*
1
Department of Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2
Department of Anatomy & Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, Einthovenweg 20, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
3
Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
4
Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2021, 8(6), 70; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd8060070
Submission received: 30 April 2021 / Revised: 31 May 2021 / Accepted: 1 June 2021 / Published: 13 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Control of Development and Function of the Cardiac Conduction System)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The electrophysiological signatures of the myocardium in cardiac structures, such as the atrioventricular node, pulmonary veins or the right ventricular outflow tract, are established during development by the spatial and temporal expression of transcription factors that guide expression of specific ion channels. Genome-wide association studies have shown that small variations in genetic regions are key to the expression of these transcription factors and thereby modulate the electrical function of the heart. Moreover, mutations in these factors are found in arrhythmogenic pathologies such as congenital atrioventricular block, as well as in specific forms of atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia. In this review, we discuss the developmental origin of distinct electrophysiological structures in the heart and their involvement in cardiac arrhythmias.

1. Introduction

Components of the heart with distinct electrophysiological signatures ensure controlled electrical impulse formation and propagation, and coordinated ventricular activation generating sufficient cardiac output required to maintain body homeostasis. During cardiac arrhythmias, cardiac output decreases, which may cause syncope or sudden cardiac death in case of fast heart rate. The origin of a significant part of these cardiac arrhythmias can be traced to congenital or acquired changes in behavior of the electrophysiological components in the heart. The combination of morphology and ion channel make-up can provide different regions of the myocardium, such as the atrioventricular node, the myocardial sleeve of the pulmonary veins or the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), with electrophysiological signatures that distinguish them from the working myocardium. During development, cardiogenic transcription factors guide the processes that shape these components and determine the ion channels expressed within [1,2]. Variations in regulatory genetic regions or mutations in genes encoding these transcription factors may alter their expression levels and predispose them to or even cause cardiac arrhythmias originating in these areas [3,4,5,6,7]. Here, we discuss the role of these transcription factors in atrioventricular node function, arrhythmias based on the presence of accessory pathways and arrhythmias originating in the RVOT or pulmonary veins.

2. General Cardiac Development

The heart forms from a pool of cardiac precursor cells located in a crescent-shaped field of splanchnic mesoderm in the developing embryo. This heart field can be divided into progenitor cells that are located lateral in the embryo and differentiate early into myocardium (referred to as the first heart field) [8], and cells that are located medially and caudally and differentiate later during cardiac development (referred to as the second heart field). The mesenchyme of the first heart field fuses at the midline forming a tube. This early heart tube is composed of primary (embryonic) myocardium and has a venous pole, an atrioventricular canal, a left ventricle and an arterial pole interconnected at the dorsal side by the dorsal mesocardium. At this stage, a large part of the inflow tract, outflow tract and cardiac chambers still need to develop. The cardiomyocytes of the heart tube have a primary (immature) phenotype characterized by an underdeveloped sarcoplasmatic reticulum, weaker contraction and slower conduction compared to cardiomyocytes of the adult heart [9,10]. The slow conduction in the primary myocardium gives rise to a sinusoidal electrocardiogram (Figure 1) [11] and a peristaltic contraction pattern.
Further in development, the conduction in the atrioventricular canal retains its slow conducting properties, whereas the conduction velocity in the working myocardium increases (Figure 2) [10]. This gradually results in an adult-like electrocardiogram in which the initial base to apex activation will transform into apex to base activation with an atrioventricular delay, although at this stage a fibrous annulus fibrosis has not formed yet [11]. The left ventricle will be formed first from progenitor cells, followed by the right ventricle, and finally the definitive OFT. The progenitor cells of these three compartments have a different developmental history and have been exposed to different signals and gene programs prior to their differentiation [12]. The OFT myocardium is initially situated entirely to the right ventricle, whereas the atrioventricular canal is initially situated entirely above the left ventricle. The OFT myocardium will retain its primary myocardial phenotype and can be distinguished from the growing (ballooning) ventricles by its expression patterns of transcription factors [13]. It is likely that differences in the phenotype and epigenetic state of the mature right and left ventricles and OFT have their origin in these developmental processes. Mice and other small mammals are often used as models to study human cardiac diseases. It is therefore important to comprehend the similarities and differences in cardiac development and electrophysiology between mice and humans [13,14,15].

3. Development of the Pulmonary Vein Myocardium and Atrial Arrhythmias

3.1. Development of the Pulmonary Vein Myocardium

The pulmonary vein myocardium forms around E11.5 in mice (week 5 in human) from mesenchyme surrounding the dorsal atrial wall. This mesenchyme expresses the transcription factor Nkx2-5 and develops in close proximity to the caval vein myocardium that encompasses the developing sino-atrial node and does not express factor Nkx2-5 [16,17,18]. After initial differentiation, the newly formed myocardium proliferates and forms the myocardial sleeves surrounding the pulmonary veins. This proliferation step depends on the expression of the transcription factor Pitx2c [19]. Moreover, the myocardialization process may depend on the connection of the pulmonary veins to the left atrium. This is suggested by the absence of myocardial sleeves surrounding the pulmonary veins in patients with congenital heart disease in which the pulmonary veins fail to drain into the left atrium [20].
In mice, as well as in humans around 8 weeks of development, the pulmonary veins drain in the common atrium through a solitary vessel. Lineage studies in mice suggest that pulmonary vein myocardium does not contribute to the formation of the atrial myocardium. In humans, however, this may be different as the walls of the initial solitary vessel will become incorporated into the left atrium around 15 weeks of development, resulting in up to four separate pulmonary venous orifices draining into the left atrium [21]. The total number of orifices may vary depending on the extent of incorporation. This suggests that the atrial myocardium in between the orifices of the pulmonary veins is composed of a mixture of vascular wall and myocardium that during development enclosed the pulmonary veins (pink area in Figure 3), providing it with a distinct developmental history compared to the remainder of the atria [22]. Nevertheless, the pulmonary vein and atrial myocardium both express the working myocardial gene program, indicated by absence of, e.g., Hcn4 and presence of Cx40 [23]. Action potential duration, however, is shorter and the upstroke velocity is lower in pulmonary vein compared to atrial myocytes [24]. The latter is not caused by reduced sodium current (INa) but is the result of more depolarized resting membrane potential due to reduced expression of inward rectifier channels [25].

3.2. Pulmonary Vein Myocardium and Arrhythmias

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent arrhythmia in adults and is related to a high risk of stroke [26]. The pulmonary vein myocardium is often the origin of arrhythmia in AF patients [27]. Both structural and electrical remodeling are thought to play an important role in the development of AF [28,29]. In addition, several transcription factors determining pulmonary vein fate during development have been implicated in susceptibility to AF, and some reports suggest the presence of nodal-like cells in the myocardial sleeve of the pulmonary veins [30,31]. Mutations in NKX2-5 are found in a subset of patients with atrial fibrillation, together with several mutations in genes encoding for potassium channels [32,33]. In Nkx2-5 haploinsufficient mice, expression of Hcn4 is increased whereas that of Gja5 (Cx40) is decreased in the pulmonary vein myocardium compared to their wild-type littermates. The ectopic activity seen in AF patients could be the result of the altered critical balance between phase 4 depolarization of the action potential (controlled by HCN4) and coupling between cells (modulated by Cx40) [27]. Similarly, PITX2C is an AF susceptibility locus [34]. The expression of PITX2C is decreased in patients with sustained AF when compared to healthy individuals, and mice haploinsufficient for Pitx2c show increased expression of ion channels linked to AF [35,36]. Furthermore, we have recently shown that Pitx2c modulates atrial electrophysiology through a T-box factor 5 (Tbx5)-dependent gene regulatory network involving Scn5a, Gja1, Ryr2, Dsp, and Atp2a2 [37]. Abnormal calcium homeostasis also caused atrial arrhythmias in mice with reduced expression of Prrx1, a transcription factor that is related to AF in human [38,39]. Unravelling the role of loci (of transcription factors) provided by genome-wide association studies in altering the molecular make-up of atrial and pulmonary vein myocardium will contribute to the understanding of initiation and maintenance of AF and may foster future patient risk stratification.

4. Development of Atrioventricular Canal and Accessory Pathways Formation

4.1. Development of the Atrioventricular Canal

Slow conduction in the atrioventricular canal results from the absence of Gja5 (Cx40) and Gja1 (Cx43), which form gap junctions with high conductance, and the absence of Scn5a (NaV1.5, voltage gated sodium channel type V) [41]. In addition, Gjd3 (Cx30.2 in mice; Cx31.9 in humans) is expressed in the atrioventricular canal and forms gap junctions with low conductance leading to slow conduction [41,42]. The expression of Gjd3 (Cx30.2) in the atrioventricular canal is regulated by transcription factors Gata4 and Tbx5 [43]. The expression of Gja5 (Cx40), Gja1 (Cx43) and Scn5a in the atrioventricular canal is repressed by Tbx2 and Tbx3, which in turn are regulated by Wnt-, bone morphogenetic protein (Bmp) 2- and Notch signalling [9,44,45,46,47]. Not surprisingly, genome-wide association studies have linked genetic variations in (non)coding regions of these genes to QRS duration and PR interval in healthy individuals [48,49,50].
During early development, there is myocardial continuity between the atria and ventricles via the atrioventricular canal myocardium. Correct patterning of the atrioventricular canal is essential for initiating the formation of the annulus fibrosis, which will electrically insulate the atria and ventricles in the adult heart [41]. The annulus fibrosis will form from mesenchyme derived from the epicardium [51,52]. Most of the embryonic atrioventricular canal myocardium differentiates to ventricular working myocardium, whereas a small part forms the atrioventricular node and ring bundles [53,54,55]. Nkx2-5, Tbx5 and Notch-signaling are part of the transcriptional network underlying formation of the atrioventricular node [17,56,57,58]. The atrioventricular junction in the adult heart can be identified based on the expression of Tbx3, Hcn4, Gjc1 (Cx45) and Gjd3 (Cx30.2) in mice, and the absence of atrial natriuretic peptide (Nppa), Gja5 (Cx40) and Gja1 (Cx43) [9]. Working myocardial gene expression in the atrioventricular junction (e.g., Scn5a) tapers off towards the compact atrioventricular node, whereas the nodal genes (Hcn4, Cacna1g) show the complementary pattern (Figure 4A) [53,59]. This differential gene expression profile in the atrioventricular junction relates to the transitional cells, which have been found to be of crucial importance for impulse conduction [60]. It has been reported that Gja1 (Cx43) and Gja5 (Cx40) are expressed in the lower part of the compact atrioventricular node (lower nodal cells) [61]. However, based on their origin and gene expression pattern we rather consider these myocytes part of the atrioventricular bundle [53]. In mice, the atrial myocardium is directly connected to the compact atrioventricular node and part of the right atrioventricular ring bundle, which are often referred to as the inferior nodal extension and transitional zone, thereby creating the basis for what in humans is commonly referred to as the fast and slow atrioventricular nodal pathway [53]. Based on expression patterns of Islet1, cardiac troponinI and Hcn4 in chick embryos, it has also been postulated that the myocardium of the sinus venosus contributes to nodal extensions or transitional cells of the atrioventricular node [62].

4.2. Mispatterning of the Atrioventricular Canal and Arrhythmias

4.2.1. Atrioventricular Conduction Disorders

A high-degree of atrioventricular conduction block is life-threatening and is a major indication for pacemaker implantation [63]. Atrioventricular block may result from various causes, including increased collagen deposition within the compact atrioventricular node during ageing, a diseased His-Purkinje system or prominent vagal activity [15,64,65]. Mutations in NKX2-5 and TBX5 are also found in a subset of patients suffering from impaired atrioventricular conduction [33]. Moreover, genome-wide association studies have implicated several loci in atrioventricular conduction, including TBX3/TBX5, NKX2-5, SOX5, WNT11, SCN10A, SCN5A, CAV1-CAV2, and MEIS1 [48,49,50,66]. Recent evidence points to an even finer regulation of transcription factors activity by regulatory elements in the DNA. In turn, transcription factors regulate in a dose-dependent manner the expression of their target genes [67,68]. For example, Tbx3 dosage controls downstream atrioventricular canal expression of calcium channel CACNA1G, thereby impacting on PR and QRS durations [69]. Thus, transcriptional regulators important for heart development play a major role in the function of the atrioventricular conduction system. Variations and mutations in these genes may impact on each component involved in PR interval (atria, atrioventricular node, atrioventricular bundle, branches and Purkinje fibers), but the difficulty lies in identifying which of these components has been affected.

4.2.2. Re-Entry Tachycardias Involving the Atrioventricular Junction

Several types of arrhythmias involve atrioventricular conduction. In atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT), the slow and the fast pathway within the atrioventricular junction and part of the transitional myocytes in the atrium form a re-entrant circuit [60]. Which factors underlie the development of this type of arrhythmia is not known, although some familial cases of AVNRT suggest a heritable component [71,72]. Atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia (AVRT) results from an accessory myocardial connection between the atrial and ventricular myocardium (Figure 4B). The myocardium of the accessory connection can have a slow conducting nodal (Mahaim) or a fast conducting working myocardial (Öhnell) phenotype [73]. An accessory connection can lead to ventricular preexcitation and AVRT, as seen in patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome [74,75]. In the presence of atrial fibrillation, preexcitation may cause ventricular fibrillation and sudden death.
The mechanism underlying the development of accessories pathways with a nodal phenotype is not fully understood. In the adult heart, the largest remnant of the embryonic atrioventricular canal is the dorsal-caudal portion of the right atrioventricular ring bundle. The right-caudal position and nodal properties of Mahaim bundles suggest that they are remnants or ill-localized atrioventricular canal tissue, or are caused by deficient remodeling of the RV inflow tract components during development [76]. Connections with a working myocardial phenotype may also be remnants of the atrioventricular canal myocardium and result from abnormal patterning of the embryonic atrioventricular canal [41,58]. Bmp2, Notch1 and Tbx2 (the latter being downstream of Bmp2) are important for correct patterning of the atrioventricular canal myocardium. Inactivation of Bmp-signaling or Tbx2, or activation of Notch-signaling in mice, causes ventricular pre-excitation (Figure 4B) [41,58,77]. Indeed, deletions have been found in BMP2 and in JAGGED1 (Notch ligand) in patients with WPW syndrome [3,4].

5. Developmental Basis for RVOT Arrhythmias

5.1. Development of the RVOT

During the fetal period, the muscular part of the embryonic OFT will be incorporated into the right ventricular free wall and form the RVOT, whereas a small part will form the connection between the left ventricle and the aorta and form the LVOT (Figure 5) [78,79]. Thus, the RVOT and the LVOT have a common origin, which may point to a common mechanism underlying OFT arrhythmias. However, the inferior part of the embryonic OFT gives rise to the subpulmonary myocardium (corresponding to RVOT) and the superior part to the subaortic myocardium. These two parts show differential gene expression (e.g., inferior part expresses Sema3C), and the subpulmonary myocardium is specifically affected and possibly largely absent in Tbx1 mutant mice [80,81]. Therefore, the RVOT and LVOT are not molecularly identical [82]. The RVOT and LVOT acquire the working myocardial phenotype just before birth [83]. The myocardium just below the valves, however, retains its primary phenotype similar to the atrioventricular ring myocardium around the entrance of the left and right ventricle [83].

5.2. Predisposition of the RVOT for Arrhythmias

Arrhythmias originate predominantly in the RVOT in idiopathic outflow tract tachycardia, Brugada syndrome. Arrhythmias in these cardiac pathologies usually do not occur at young age but rather in adulthood, indicating that postnatal development and maturation play an important role in disease development. The electrophysiological signature of the RVOT, however, develops prenatally and is different from that of the left and right ventricle [84]. The developmental history and phenotype of the RVOT are not intrinsically arrhythmogenic but may predispose to arrhythmias in the setting of an active pathological mechanism that progresses during life (Figure 5).

5.3. Brugada Syndrome

The Brugada syndrome is characterized by ST segment elevation in the right precordial leads of the electrocardiogram, highly fractionated local electrograms in the RVOT and ventricular arrhythmias [85,86,87,88]. The mechanism underlying these characteristics is debated, but evidence supporting conduction delay or block as a potential mechanism is accumulating. In 20–30% of the Brugada syndrome patients, a loss of function mutation in SCN5A has been found [86]. A reduction in INa itself, however, does not lead to the Brugada characteristics [89]. In contrast, reducing the INa is used to discriminate between patients who have the Brugada syndrome and patients who have not [86]. In patients with the Brugada syndrome, subtle small structural discontinuities have been demonstrated in the right ventricular wall and RVOT [90,91]. Experimental and clinical studies have shown that conduction can be delayed in myocardium with small structural discontinuities or even be blocked by a mechanism called current-to-load mismatch [92,93]. The conduction block is a prerequisite for re-entry and may generate a substrate for re-entrant based arrhythmias as seen in Brugada syndrome patients [90]. In addition, conduction delay or block can cause ST segment elevation on the body surface ECG, which is a hallmark of the Brugada syndrome [94,95].
Although a unifying mechanism explaining arrhythmias in Brugada syndrome patients has been proposed [95], it does not offer an explanation for the preferential location of these arrhythmias in the RVOT. We surmise that genes of the ventricular working myocardial gene program are less active in the RVOT, resulting in a reduced conduction reserve, thereby facilitating current-to-load mismatch and subsequently arrhythmias [84,96,97,98]. Indeed, lower expression of CX43 protein has been found in the epicardial region of the RVOT when compared to the right ventricle in patients with Brugada syndrome [99].

5.4. Idiopathic Outflow Tract Tachycardia

Idiopathic RVOT tachycardia are catecholamine-sensitive, suggesting automaticity or triggered activity as an underlying mechanism [101]. Accordingly, idiopathic arrhythmias can be treated with adenosine or beta-blockers [102]. A subset of myocytes in the RVOT have longer action potentials, do not repolarize fully to resting membrane potential, have a higher sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium content and easily develop early after depolarizations when compared to right ventricular myocytes [103,104]. This electrophysiological phenotype is expected from primary ring myocardium that is present just below, and above, the valves of the pulmonary artery. These primary myocytes may, in the presence of structural changes or uncoupling, give rise to spontaneous activity [105,106]. Consistently, ectopic beats in the RVOT are reported to originate from the myocardium just below the pulmonary valve and even from myocardial sleeves into the pulmonary artery [107,108]. For the moment, however, a direct relationship between these primary cells and idiopathic RVOT tachycardia remains hypothetical and further research is required to determine a causal relationship.
Typically, idiopathic RVOT tachycardia arises more frequently during periods of wakefulness, stress and activity while disappearing entirely during rest [101]. Current evidence strongly points towards a role for the autonomic nervous system, and in specific sympathovagal balance, to the initiation and maintenance of these arrhythmias. Studies in patients with idiopathic RVOT tachycardia showed that episodes of ventricular tachycardia were typically preceded by a sudden shortening of the RR interval on electrocardiogram, likely attributable to abrupt sympathetic predominance [109,110,111]. In canines, RVOT tachycardia induced by catheter-mediated high-frequency stimulation of the pulmonary artery originated most often from sites of the RVOT septal wall, the same sites that showed a greater density of tyrosine hydroxylase-positive (sympathetic) neurons compared to non-origin sites [112,113]. The RVOT septal wall also previously found the preferential site of occurrence of RVOT tachycardia in patients compared to other RVOT sites [114].
Other than its anatomical site of origin, the mechanism of idiopathic RVOT tachycardia can be considered well established and involves cAMP-mediated intracellular calcium overload that, in turn, predisposes it to afterdepolarizations and triggered activity [100,115,116]. In particular, genes involved in intracellular calcium regulation were differentially regulated in RVOT septal wall biopsies taken from patients with idiopathic RVOT tachycardia compared to control subjects, further indicating a calcium-dependent mechanism [117]. The distinctive electrophysiological properties of a subset of RVOT myocytes similar to that of the primary ring myocardium may predispose them to an increased triggered activity and tachycardia upon conditions of increased sympathetic tone.

6. Conclusions

In this review, we show a direct relation between the spatio-temporal activity of particular cardiac transcription factors and the electrophysiological characteristics of myocardial components. Insight into the mechanisms that regulate the expression of these factors and their consequences on the expression of their target ion channel genes could lead to the identification of new approaches and candidate markers for improved arrhythmogenic risk stratification.

Author Contributions

M.R.R. and B.J.B. drafted the manuscript and designed the figures. M.B. and M.R.M.J. critically read and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

M.R.M.J. was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NOW, 016.196.346) and B.J.B. by the Dutch Heart Foundation (2016T047).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Costantini, D.L.; Arruda, E.P.; Agarwal, P.; Kim, K.H.; Zhu, Y.; Zhu, W.; Lebel, M.; Cheng, C.W.; Park, C.Y.; Pierce, S.A.; et al. The homeodomain transcription factor Irx5 establishes the mouse cardiac ventricular repolarization gradient. Cell 2005, 123, 347–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Veerman, C.C.; Podliesna, S.; Tadros, R.; Lodder, E.M.; Mengarelli, I.; de Jonge, B.; Beekman, L.; Barc, J.; Wilders, R.; Wilde, A.A.M.M.; et al. The Brugada Syndrome Susceptibility Gene HEY2 Modulates Cardiac Transmural Ion Channel Patterning and Electrical Heterogeneity. Circ. Res. 2017, 121, 537–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lalani, S.R.; Thakuria, J.V.; Cox, G.F.; Wang, X.; Bi, W.; Bray, M.S.; Shaw, C.; Cheung, S.W.; Chinault, A.C.; Boggs, B.A.; et al. 20p12.3 microdeletion predisposes to Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome with variable neurocognitive deficits. J. Med. Genet. 2009, 46, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Le, G.L.; Pichon, O.; Isidor, B.; Boceno, M.; Rival, J.M.; David, A.; Le, C.C. A 8.26Mb deletion in 6q16 and a 4.95Mb deletion in 20p12 including JAG1 and BMP2 in a patient with Alagille syndrome and Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Eur.J. Med. Genet. 2008, 51, 651–657. [Google Scholar]
  5. Basson, C.T.; Huang, T.; Lin, R.C.; Bachinsky, D.R.; Weremowicz, S.; Vaglio, A.; Bruzzone, R.; Quadrelli, R.; Lerone, M.; Romeo, G.; et al. Different TBX5 interactions in heart and limb defined by Holt-Oram syndrome mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 2919–2924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Hatcher, C.J.; Basson, C.T. Specification of the cardiac conduction system by transcription factors. Circ. Res. 2009, 105, 620–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Schott, J.J.; Benson, D.W.; Basson, C.T.; Pease, W.; Silberbach, G.M.; Moak, J.P.; Maron, B.J.; Seidman, C.E.; Seidman, J.G. Congenital heart disease caused by mutations in the transcription factor NKX2-5. Science 1998, 281, 108–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Buckingham, M.; Meilhac, S.; Zaffran, S. Building the mammalian heart from two sources of myocardial cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2005, 6, 826–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Christoffels, V.M.; Smits, G.J.; Kispert, A.; Moorman, A.F. Development of the pacemaker tissues of the heart. Circ. Res. 2010, 106, 240–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. De Jong, F.; Opthof, T.; Wilde, A.A.; Janse, M.J.; Charles, R.; Lamers, W.H.; Moorman, A.F. Persisting zones of slow impulse conduction in developing chicken hearts. Circ. Res. 1992, 71, 240–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hoff, E.C.; Kramer, T.C.; DuBois, D.; Patten, B.M. The development of the electrocardiogram of the embryonic heart. Am. Heart J. 1939, 17, 470–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kelly, R.G.; Brown, N.A.; Buckingham, M.E. The arterial pole of the mouse heart forms from Fgf10-expressing cells in pharyngeal mesoderm. Dev. Cell 2001, 1, 435–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Moorman, A.F.; Christoffels, V.M. Cardiac chamber formation: Development, genes, and evolution. Physiol. Rev. 2003, 83, 1223–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Boukens, B.J.J.; Rivaud, M.R.R.; Rentschler, S.; Coronel, R. Misinterpretation of the mouse ECG: “musing the waves of Mus musculus. ” J. Physiol. 2014, 592, 4613–4626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sizarov, A.; Ya, J.; de Boer, B.A.; Lamers, W.H.; Christoffels, V.M.; Moorman, A.F. Formation of the building plan of the human heart: Morphogenesis, growth, and differentiation. Circulation 2011, 123, 1125–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Mommersteeg, M.T.M.; Hoogaars, W.M.H.; Prall, O.W.J.; de Gier-de Vries, C.; Wiese, C.; Clout, D.E.W.; Papaioannou, V.E.; Brown, N.A.; Harvey, R.P.; Moorman, A.F.M.; et al. Molecular pathway for the localized formation of the sinoatrial node. Circ. Res. 2007, 100, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Jongbloed, M.R.M.; Vicente Steijn, R.; Hahurij, N.D.; Kelder, T.P.; Schalij, M.J.; Gittenberger-de Groot, A.C.; Blom, N.A. Normal and abnormal development of the cardiac conduction system; implications for conduction and rhythm disorders in the child and adult. Differentiation 2012, 84, 131–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lescroart, F.; Mohun, T.; Meilhac, S.M.; Bennett, M.; Buckingham, M. Lineage tree for the venous pole of the heart: Clonal analysis clarifies controversial genealogy based on genetic tracing. Circ. Res. 2012, 111, 1313–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Mommersteeg, M.T.; Brown, N.A.; Prall, O.W.; de Gier-de, V.C.; Harvey, R.P.; Moorman, A.F.; Christoffels, V.M. Pitx2c and Nkx2-5 are required for the formation and identity of the pulmonary myocardium. Circ. Res. 2007, 101, 902–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Douglas, Y.L.; Jongbloed, M.R.M.; den Hartog, W.C.E.; Bartelings, M.M.; Bogers, A.J.J.C.; Ebels, T.; DeRuiter, M.C.; Gittenberger-de Groot, A.C. Pulmonary vein and atrial wall pathology in human total anomalous pulmonary venous connection. Int. J. Cardiol. 2009, 134, 302–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Webb, S.; Kanani, M.; Anderson, R.H.; Richardson, M.K.; Brown, N.A. Development of the human pulmonary vein and its incorporation in the morphologically left atrium. Cardiol. Young 2001, 11, 632–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Douglas, Y.L.; Jongbloed, M.R.M.; Gittenberger-De Groot, A.C.; Evers, D.; Dion, R.A.E.; Voigt, P.; Bartelings, M.M.; Schalij, M.J.; Ebels, T.; DeRuiter, M.C. Histology of vascular myocardial wall of left atrial body after pulmonary venous incorporation. Am. J. Cardiol. 2006, 97, 662–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Verheule, S.; Wilson, E.E.; Arora, R.; Engle, S.K.; Scott, L.R.; Olgin, J.E. Tissue structure and connexin expression of canine pulmonary veins. Cardiovasc. Res. 2002, 55, 727–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Ehrlich, J.R.; Cha, T.J.; Zhang, L.; Chartier, D.; Melnyk, P.; Hohnloser, S.H.; Nattel, S. Cellular electrophysiology of canine pulmonary vein cardiomyocytes: Action potential and ionic current properties. J. Physiol. 2003, 551, 801–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Melnyk, P.; Ehrlich, J.R.; Pourrier, M.; Villeneuve, L.; Cha, T.-J.; Nattel, S. Comparison of ion channel distribution and expression in cardiomyocytes of canine pulmonary veins versus left atrium. Cardiovasc. Res. 2005, 65, 104–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kannel, W.B.; Benjamin, E.J. Status of the epidemiology of atrial fibrillation. Med. Clin. North Am. 2008, 92, 17–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Haissaguerre, M.; Jais, P.; Shah, D.C.; Takahashi, A.; Hocini, M.; Quiniou, G.; Garrigue, S.; Le, M.A.; Le, M.P.; Clementy, J. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. New Engl. J. Med. 1998, 339, 659–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Allessie, M.; Ausma, J.; Schotten, U. Electrical, contractile and structural remodeling during atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc. Res. 2002, 54, 230–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gottlieb, L.A.; Dekker, L.R.C.; Coronel, R. The Blinding Period Following Ablation Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation: Proarrhythmic and Antiarrhythmic Pathophysiological Mechanisms. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol. 2021, 7, 416–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Perez-Lugones, A.; McMahon, J.T.; Ratliff, N.B.; Saliba, W.I.; Schweikert, R.A.; Marrouche, N.F.; Saad, E.B.; Navia, J.L.; McCarthy, P.M.; Tchou, P.; et al. Evidence of specialized conduction cells in human pulmonary veins of patients with atrial fibrillation. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2003, 14, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Masani, F. Node-like cells in the myocardial layer of the pulmonary vein of rats: An ultrastructural study. J. Anat. 1986, 145, 133–142. [Google Scholar]
  32. Andalib, A.; Brugada, R.; Nattel, S. Atrial fibrillation: Evidence for genetically determined disease. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2008, 23, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gutierrez-Roelens, I.; De, R.L.; Ovaert, C.; Sluysmans, T.; Devriendt, K.; Brunner, H.G.; Vikkula, M. A novel CSX/NKX2-5 mutation causes autosomal-dominant AV block: Are atrial fibrillation and syncopes part of the phenotype? Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2006, 14, 1313–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gudbjartsson, D.F.; Arnar, D.O.; Helgadottir, A.; Gretarsdottir, S.; Holm, H.; Sigurdsson, A.; Jonasdottir, A.; Baker, A.; Thorleifsson, G.; Kristjansson, K.; et al. Variants conferring risk of atrial fibrillation on chromosome 4q25. Nature 2007, 448, 353–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tao, G.; Kahr, P.C.; Morikawa, Y.; Zhang, M.; Rahmani, M.; Heallen, T.R.; Li, L.; Sun, Z.; Olson, E.N.; Amendt, B.A.; et al. Pitx2 promotes heart repair by activating the antioxidant response after cardiac injury. Nature 2016, 534, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chinchilla, A.; Daimi, H.; Lozano-Velasco, E.; Dominguez, J.N.; Caballero, R.; Delpon, E.; Tamargo, J.; Cinca, J.; Hove-Madsen, L.; Aranega, A.E.; et al. PITX2 Insufficiency leads to atrial electrical and structural remodeling linked to arrhythmogenesis. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet. 2011, 4, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Nadadur, R.D.; Broman, M.T.; Boukens, B.; Mazurek, S.R.; Yang, X.; Van Den Boogaard, M.; Bekeny, J.; Gadek, M.; Ward, T.; Zhang, M.; et al. Pitx2 modulates a Tbx5-dependent gene regulatory network to maintain atrial rhythm. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Tucker, N.R.; Dolmatova, E.V.; Lin, H.; Cooper, R.R.; Ye, J.; Hucker, W.J.; Jameson, H.S.; Parsons, V.A.; Weng, L.C.; Mills, R.W.; et al. Diminished PRRX1 Expression Is Associated With Increased Risk of Atrial Fibrillation and Shortening of the Cardiac Action Potential. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet. 2017, 10, e001902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Bossada, F.; Rivaud, M.; Christoffels, V.; Boukens, B.J.D. Noncoding region regulates Prrx1 and predisposes to atrial arrhythmias. Circ. Res. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Haissaguerre, M.; Hocini, M.; Denis, A.; Shah, A.J.; Komatsu, Y.; Yamashita, S.; Daly, M.; Amraoui, S.; Zellerhoff, S.; Picat, M.Q.; et al. Driver domains in persistent atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2014, 130, 530–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Aanhaanen, W.T.J.; Boukens, B.J.D.; Sizarov, A.; Wakker, V.; de Gier-de Vries, C.; van Ginneken, A.C.; Moorman, A.F.M.; Coronel, R.; Christoffels, V.M. Defective Tbx2-dependent patterning of the atrioventricular canal myocardium causes accessory pathway formation in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2011, 121, 534–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Kreuzberg, M.M.; Sohl, G.; Kim, J.S.; Verselis, V.K.; Willecke, K.; Bukauskas, F.F. Functional properties of mouse connexin30.2 expressed in the conduction system of the heart. Circ. Res. 2005, 96, 1169–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Munshi, N.V.; McAnally, J.; Bezprozvannaya, S.; Berry, J.M.; Richardson, J.A.; Hill, J.A.; Olson, E.N. Cx30.2 enhancer analysis identifies Gata4 as a novel regulator of atrioventricular delay. Development 2009, 136, 2665–2674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Aanhaanen, W.T.; Moorman, A.F.; Christoffels, V.M. Origin and development of the atrioventricular myocardial lineage: Insight into the development of accessory pathways. Birth Defects Res. A Clin. Mol. Teratol. 2011, 91, 565–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hoogaars, W.M.; Engel, A.; Brons, J.F.; Verkerk, A.O.; de Lange, F.J.; Wong, L.Y.; Bakker, M.L.; Clout, D.E.; Wakker, V.; Barnett, P.; et al. Tbx3 controls the sinoatrial node gene program and imposes pacemaker function on the atria. Genes Dev. 2007, 21, 1098–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Ma, L.; Lu, M.F.; Schwartz, R.J.; Martin, J.F. Bmp2 is essential for cardiac cushion epithelial-mesenchymal transition and myocardial patterning. Development 2005, 132, 5601–5611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Gillers, B.S.; Chiplunkar, A.; Aly, H.; Valenta, T.; Basler, K.; Christoffels, V.M.; Efimov, I.R.; Boukens, B.J.; Rentschler, S. Canonical wnt signaling regulates atrioventricular junction programming and electrophysiological properties. Circ. Res. 2015, 116, 398–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Holm, H.; Gudbjartsson, D.F.; Arnar, D.O.; Thorleifsson, G.; Thorgeirsson, G.; Stefansdottir, H.; Gudjonsson, S.A.; Jonasdottir, A.; Mathiesen, E.B.; Njolstad, I.; et al. Several common variants modulate heart rate, PR interval and QRS duration. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pfeufer, A.; van Noord, C.; Marciante, K.D.; Arking, D.E.; Larson, M.G.; Smith, A.V.; Tarasov, K.V.; Müller, M.; Sotoodehnia, N.; Sinner, M.F.; et al. Genome-wide association study of PR interval. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sotoodehnia, N.; Isaacs, A.; de Bakker, P.I.W.; Dörr, M.; Newton-Cheh, C.; Nolte, I.M.; van der Harst, P.; Müller, M.; Eijgelsheim, M.; Alonso, A.; et al. Common variants in 22 loci are associated with QRS duration and cardiac ventricular conduction. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42, 1068–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Lockhart, M.M.; Phelps, A.L.; van den Hoff, M.J.B.; Wessels, A. The Epicardium and the Development of the Atrioventricular Junction in the Murine Heart. J. Dev. Biol. 2014, 2, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wessels, A.; Markman, M.W.; Vermeulen, J.L.; Anderson, R.H.; Moorman, A.F.; Lamers, W.H. The development of the atrioventricular junction in the human heart. Circ. Res. 1996, 78, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Aanhaanen, W.T.; Mommersteeg, M.T.; Norden, J.; Wakker, V.; de Gier-de, V.C.; Anderson, R.H.; Kispert, A.; Moorman, A.F.; Christoffels, V.M. Developmental origin, growth, and three-dimensional architecture of the atrioventricular conduction axis of the mouse heart. Circ. Res. 2010, 107, 728–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Aanhaanen, W.T.; Brons, J.F.; Dominguez, J.N.; Rana, M.S.; Norden, J.; Airik, R.; Wakker, V.; de Gier-de, V.C.; Brown, N.A.; Kispert, A.; et al. The Tbx2+ primary myocardium of the atrioventricular canal forms the atrioventricular node and the base of the left ventricle. Circ. Res. 2009, 104, 1267–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Viragh, S.; Challice, C.E. The development of the conduction system in the mouse embryo heart. Dev. Biol. 1980, 80, 28–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jay, P.Y.; Harris, B.S.; Maguire, C.T.; Buerger, A.; Wakimoto, H.; Tanaka, M.; Kupershmidt, S.; Roden, D.M.; Schultheiss, T.M.; O’Brien, T.X.; et al. Nkx2-5 mutation causes anatomic hypoplasia of the cardiac conduction system. J. Clin. Invest. 2004, 113, 1130–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Moskowitz, I.P.; Pizard, A.; Patel, V.V.; Bruneau, B.G.; Kim, J.B.; Kupershmidt, S.; Roden, D.; Berul, C.I.; Seidman, C.E.; Seidman, J.G. The T-Box transcription factor Tbx5 is required for the patterning and maturation of the murine cardiac conduction system. Development 2004, 131, 4107–4116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Rentschler, S.; Harris, B.S.; Kuznekoff, L.; Jain, R.; Manderfield, L.; Lu, M.M.; Morley, G.E.; Patel, V.V.; Epstein, J.A. Notch signaling regulates murine atrioventricular conduction and the formation of accessory pathways. J. Clin. Invest. 2011, 121, 525–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Greener, I.D.; Monfredi, O.; Inada, S.; Chandler, N.J.; Tellez, J.O.; Atkinson, A.; Taube, M.A.; Billeter, R.; Anderson, R.H.; Efimov, I.R.; et al. Molecular architecture of the human specialised atrioventricular conduction axis. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2011, 50, 642–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. McGuire, M.A.; Janse, M.J.; Ross, D.L. “AV nodal” reentry: Part II: AV nodal, AV junctional, or atrionodal reentry? J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 1993, 4, 573–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Li, J.; Greener, I.D.; Inada, S.; Nikolski, V.P.; Yamamoto, M.; Hancox, J.C.; Zhang, H.; Billeter, R.; Efimov, I.R.; Dobrzynski, H.; et al. Computer three-dimensional reconstruction of the atrioventricular node. Circ. Res. 2008, 102, 975–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kelder, T.P.; Vicente-Steijn, R.; Harryvan, T.J.; Kosmidis, G.; Gittenberger-de Groot, A.C.; Poelmann, R.E.; Schalij, M.J.; DeRuiter, M.C.; Jongbloed, M.R.M. The sinus venosus myocardium contributes to the atrioventricular canal: Potential role during atrioventricular node development? J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2015, 19, 1375–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Mond, H.G.; Proclemer, A. The 11th World Survey of Cardiac Pacing and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Calendar Year 2009-A World Society of Arrhythmia’s Project. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2011, 34, 1013–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lee, S.; Wellens, H.J.J.; Josephson, M.E. Paroxysmal atrioventricular block. Heart Rhythm 2009, 6, 1229–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Alboni, P.; Holz, A.; Brignole, M. Vagally mediated atrioventricular block: Pathophysiology and diagnosis. Heart 2013, 99, 904–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chambers, J.C.; Zhao, J.; Terracciano, C.M.N.; Bezzina, C.R.; Zhang, W.; Kaba, R.; Navaratnarajah, M.; Lotlikar, A.; Sehmi, J.S.; Kooner, M.K.; et al. Genetic variation in SCN10A influences cardiac conduction. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42, 149–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. van Weerd, J.H.; Mohan, R.A.; van Duijvenboden, K.; Hooijkaas, I.B.; Wakker, V.; Boukens, B.J.; Barnett, P.; Christoffels, V.M. Trait-associated noncoding variant regions affect TBX3 regulation and cardiac conduction. Elife 2020, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Frank, D.U.; Carter, K.L.; Thomas, K.R.; Burr, R.M.; Bakker, M.L.; Coetzee, W.A.; Tristani-Firouzi, M.; Bamshad, M.J.; Christoffels, V.M.; Moon, A.M. Lethal arrhythmias in Tbx3-deficient mice reveal extreme dosage sensitivity of cardiac conduction system function and homeostasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, E154–E163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Mohan, R.A.; Bosada, F.M.; van Weerd, J.H.; van Duijvenboden, K.; Wang, J.; Mommersteeg, M.T.M.; Hooijkaas, I.B.; Wakker, V.; de Gier-de Vries, C.; Coronel, R.; et al. T-box transcription factor 3 governs a transcriptional program for the function of the mouse atrioventricular conduction system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 18617–18626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Meijler, F.R.; Janse, M.J. Morphology and electrophysiology of the mammalian atrioventricular node. Physiol. Rev. 1988, 68, 608–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Frisch, D.R.; Kwaku, K.F.; Allocco, D.J.; Zimetbaum, P.J. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in two siblings with Wolfram syndrome. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2006, 17, 1029–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hayes, J.J.; Sharma, P.P.; Smith, P.N.; Vidaillet, H.J. Familial atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2004, 27, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Anderson, R.H.; Ho, S.Y.; Gillette, P.C.; Becker, A.E. Mahaim, Kent and abnormal atrioventricular conduction. Cardiovasc. Res. 1996, 31, 480–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Deal, B.J.; Keane, J.F.; Gillette, P.C.; Garson, A., Jr. Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and supraventricular tachycardia during infancy: Management and follow-up. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1985, 5, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Boukens, B.J.; Janse, M.J. Brief history of arrhythmia in the WPW syndrome—The contribution of George Ralph Mines. J. Physiol. 2013, 591, 4067–4071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Jongbloed, M.R.M.; Wijffels, M.C.E.F.; Schalij, M.J.; Blom, N.A.; Poelmann, R.E.; van der Laarse, A.; Mentink, M.M.T.; Wang, Z.; Fishman, G.I.; Gittenberger-de Groot, A.C. Development of the right ventricular inflow tract and moderator band: A possible morphological and functional explanation for Mahaim tachycardia. Circ. Res. 2005, 96, 776–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Stroud, D.M.; Gaussin, V.; Burch, J.B.; Yu, C.; Mishina, Y.; Schneider, M.D.; Fishman, G.I.; Morley, G.E. Abnormal conduction and morphology in the atrioventricular node of mice with atrioventricular canal targeted deletion of Alk3/Bmpr1a receptor. Circulation 2007, 116, 2535–2543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Rana, M.S.; Horsten, N.C.A.; Tesink-Taekema, S.; Lamers, W.H.; Moorman, A.F.M.; van den Hoff, M.J.B. Trabeculated right ventricular free wall in the chicken heart forms by ventricularization of the myocardium initially forming the outflow tract. Circ. Res. 2007, 100, 1000–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. De la Cruz, M.V.; Sanchez, G.C.; Arteaga, M.M.; Arguello, C. Experimental study of the development of the truncus and the conus in the chick embryo. J. Anat. 1977, 123, 661–686. [Google Scholar]
  80. Theveniau-Ruissy, M.; Dandonneau, M.; Mesbah, K.; Ghez, O.; Mattei, M.G.; Miquerol, L.; Kelly, R.G. The del22q11.2 candidate gene Tbx1 controls regional outflow tract identity and coronary artery patterning. Circ. Res. 2008, 103, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Rana, M.S.; Théveniau-Ruissy, M.; De Bono, C.; Mesbah, K.; Francou, A.; Rammah, M.; Domínguez, J.N.; Roux, M.; Laforest, B.; Anderson, R.H.; et al. Tbx1 coordinates addition of posterior second heart field progenitor cells to the arterial and venous poles of the heart. Circ. Res. 2014, 115, 790–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Sizarov, A.; Anderson, R.H.; Christoffels, V.M.; Moorman, A.F. Three-dimensional and molecular analysis of the venous pole of the developing human heart. Circulation 2010, 122, 798–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Boukens, B.J.; Sylva, M.; De Gier-De Vries, C.; Remme, C.A.; Bezzina, C.R.; Christoffels, V.M.; Coronel, R. Reduced sodium channel function unmasks residual embryonic slow conduction in the adult right ventricular outflow tract. Circ. Res. 2013, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Boukens, B.J.D.; Christoffels, V.M.; Coronel, R.; Moorman, A.F.M. Developmental Basis for Electrophysiological Heterogeneity in the Ventricular and Outflow Tract Myocardium As a Substrate for Life-Threatening Ventricular Arrhythmias. Circ. Res. 2009, 104, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Nademanee, K.; Veerakul, G.; Chandanamattha, P.; Chaothawee, L.; Ariyachaipanich, A.; Jirasirirojanakorn, K.; Likittanasombat, K.; Bhuripanyo, K.; Ngarmukos, T. Prevention of ventricular fibrillation episodes in Brugada syndrome by catheter ablation over the anterior right ventricular outflow tract epicardium. Circulation 2011, 123, 1270–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Antzelevitch, C.; Yan, G.X.; Ackerman, M.J.; Borggrefe, M.; Corrado, D.; Guo, J.; Gussak, I.; Hasdemir, C.; Horie, M.; Huikuri, H.; et al. J-Wave syndromes expert consensus conference report: Emerging concepts and gaps in knowledge. J. Arrhythm. 2016, 32, 315–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Zhang, Y.; Wu, J.; King, J.H.; Huang, C.L.; Fraser, J.A. Measurement and interpretation of electrocardiographic QT intervals in murine hearts. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2014, 306, H1553–H1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Ten Sande, J.N.; Coronel, R.; Conrath, C.E.; Driessen, A.H.; de Groot, J.R.; Tan, H.L.; Nademanee, K.; Wilde, A.A.; de Bakker, J.M.; van Dessel, P.F. ST-Segment Elevation and Fractionated Electrograms in Brugada Syndrome Patients Arise from the Same Structurally Abnormal Subepicardial RVOT Area but Have a Different Mechanism. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kyndt, F.; Probst, V.; Potet, F.; Demolombe, S.; Chevallier, J.C.; Baro, I.; Moisan, J.P.; Boisseau, P.; Schott, J.J.; Escande, D.; et al. Novel SCN5A mutation leading either to isolated cardiac conduction defect or Brugada syndrome in a large French family. Circulation 2001, 104, 3081–3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Coronel, R.; Casini, S.; Koopmann, T.T.; Wilms-Schopman, F.J.G.; Verkerk, A.O.; de Groot, J.R.; Bhuiyan, Z.; Bezzina, C.R.; Veldkamp, M.W.; Linnenbank, A.C.; et al. Right ventricular fibrosis and conduction delay in a patient with clinical signs of Brugada syndrome: A combined electrophysiological, genetic, histopathologic, and computational study. Circulation 2005, 112, 2769–2777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Frustaci, A.; Priori, S.; Pieroni, M.; Chimenti, C.; Napolitano, C.; Rivolta, I.; Sanna, T.; Bellocci, F.; Russo, M.A. Cardiac histological substrate in patients with clinical phenotype of Brugada syndrome. Circulation 2005, 112, 3680–3687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Postema, P.G.; van Dessel, P.F.; de Bakker, J.M.; Dekker, L.R.; Linnenbank, A.C.; Hoogendijk, M.G.; Coronel, R.; Tijssen, J.G.; Wilde, A.A.; Tan, H.L. Slow and discontinuous conduction conspire in Brugada syndrome: A right ventricular mapping and stimulation study. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2008, 1, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Hoogendijk, M.G.; Potse, M.; Vinet, A.; de Bakker, J.M.; Coronel, R. ST segment elevation by current-to-load mismatch: An experimental and computational study. Heart Rhythm 2011, 8, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Hoogendijk, M.G.; Potse, M.; Linnenbank, A.C.; Verkerk, A.O.; Den Ruijter, H.M.; van Amersfoorth, S.C.; Klaver, E.C.; Beekman, L.; Bezzina, C.R.; Postema, P.G.; et al. Mechanism of right precordial ST-segment elevation in structural heart disease: Excitation failure by current-to-load mismatch. Heart Rhythm 2010, 7, 238–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Hoogendijk, M.G.; Opthof, T.; Postema, P.G.; Wilde, A.A.; de Bakker, J.M.; Coronel, R. The Brugada ECG pattern: A marker of channelopathy, structural heart disease, or neither? Toward a unifying mechanism of the Brugada syndrome. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2010, 3, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Boukens, B.J.; Coronel, R.; Christoffels, V.M.; Engineering, B. Embryonic development of the right ventricular out fl ow tract and arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm 2016, 13, 616–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Blok, M.; Boukens, B.J. Mechanisms of Arrhythmias in the Brugada Syndrome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Behr, E.R.; Ben-Haim, Y.; Ackerman, M.J.; Krahn, A.D.; Wilde, A.A.M. Brugada syndrome and reduced right ventricular outflow tract conduction reserve: A final common pathway? Eur. Heart J. 2021, 42, 1073–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Nademanee, K.; Raju, H.; de Noronha, S.V.; Papadakis, M.; Robinson, L.; Rothery, S.; Makita, N.; Kowase, S.; Boonmee, N.; Vitayakritsirikul, V.; et al. Fibrosis, Connexin-43, and Conduction Abnormalities in the Brugada Syndrome. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2015, 66, 1976–1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Kim, R.J.; Iwai, S.; Markowitz, S.M.; Shah, B.K.; Stein, K.M.; Lerman, B.B. Clinical and electrophysiological spectrum of idiopathic ventricular outflow tract arrhythmias. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007, 49, 2035–2043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Lerman, B.B. Mechanism, diagnosis, and treatment of outflow tract tachycardia. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2015, 12, 597–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Shimizu, W. Arrhythmias originating from the right ventricular outflow tract: How to distinguish “malignant” from “benign”? Heart Rhythm 2009, 6, 1507–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Liang, S.; Lin, C.; Li, Y.; Liu, T.; Wang, Y. L-type calcium current in right ventricular outflow tract myocytes of rabbit heart. Sci. China Life Sci. 2012, 55, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Lu, Y.-Y.; Chung, F.-P.; Chen, Y.-C.; Tsai, C.-F.; Kao, Y.-H.; Chao, T.-F.; Huang, J.-H.; Chen, S.-A.; Chen, Y.-J. Distinctive electrophysiological characteristics of right ventricular out-flow tract cardiomyocytes. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2014, 18, 1540–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Xie, Y.; Sato, D.; Garfinkel, A.; Qu, Z.; Weiss, J.N. So little source, so much sink: Requirements for afterdepolarizations to propagate in tissue. Biophys. J. 2010, 99, 1408–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Dobrzynski, H.; Anderson, R.H.; Atkinson, A.; Borbas, Z.; D’Souza, A.; Fraser, J.F.; Inada, S.; Logantha, S.J.R.J.; Monfredi, O.; Morris, G.M.; et al. Structure, function and clinical relevance of the cardiac conduction system, including the atrioventricular ring and outflow tract tissues. Pharmacol. Ther. 2013, 139, 260–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Liu, C.F.; Cheung, J.W.; Thomas, G.; Ip, J.E.; Markowitz, S.M.; Lerman, B.B. Ubiquitous myocardial extensions into the pulmonary artery demonstrated by integrated intracardiac echocardiography and electroanatomic mapping: Changing the paradigm of idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract arrhythmias. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2014, 7, 691–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Timmermans, C.; Rodriguez, L.M.; Crijns, H.J.; Moorman, A.F.; Wellens, H.J. Idiopathic left bundle-branch block-shaped ventricular tachycardia may originate above the pulmonary valve. Circulation 2003, 108, 1960–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Zimmermann, M. Sympathovagal balance prior to onset of repetitive monomorphic idiopathic ventricular tachycardia. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2005, 28, S163–S167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Yoshida, A.; Inoue, T.; Ohnishi, Y.; Yokoyama, M. Heart rate variability before spontaneous episodes of ventricular tachycardia originating from right ventricular outflow tract in patients without organic heart disease. Jpn. Circ. J. 1998, 62, 745–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Hayashi, H.; Fujiki, A.; Tani, M.; Mizumaki, K.; Shimono, M.; Inoue, H. Role of sympathovagal balance in the initiation of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia originating from right ventricular outflow tract. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 1997, 20, 2371–2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Wang, Z.; Gao, H.; Dong, R.; Zhao, C.; Yu, T.; Yang, L.; Peng, H.; Wu, Y. Increased Local Sympathetic Nerve Activity During Pathogenesis of Ventricular Arrhythmias Originating from the Right Ventricular Outflow Tract. Med. Sci. Monit. 2017, 23, 1090–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Chang, H.-Y.; Lo, L.-W.; Chen, Y.-R.; Chou, Y.-H.; Lin, W.-L.; Lin, Y.-J.; Yin, W.-H.; Feng, A.-N.; Chen, S.-A. The autonomic neural mechanism of right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia. Auton. Neurosci. 2018, 212, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Kamakura, S.; Shimizu, W.; Matsuo, K.; Taguchi, A.; Suyama, K.; Kurita, T.; Aihara, N.; Ohe, T.; Shimomura, K. Localization of optimal ablation site of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia from right and left ventricular outflow tract by body surface ECG. Circulation 1998, 98, 1525–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Lerman, B.B.; Stein, K.; Engelstein, E.D.; Battleman, D.S.; Lippman, N.; Bei, D.; Catanzaro, D. Mechanism of repetitive monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Circulation 1995, 92, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Iwai, S.; Cantillon, D.J.; Kim, R.J.; Markowitz, S.M.; Mittal, S.; Stein, K.M.; Shah, B.K.; Yarlagadda, R.K.; Cheung, J.W.; Tan, V.R.; et al. Right and left ventricular outflow tract tachycardias: Evidence for a common electrophysiologic mechanism. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2006, 17, 1052–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Hasdemir, C.; Aydin, H.H.; Celik, H.A.; Simsek, E.; Payzin, S.; Kayikcioglu, M.; Aydin, M.; Kultursay, H.; Can, L.H. Transcriptional profiling of septal wall of the right ventricular outflow tract in patients with idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2010, 33, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jcdd 08 00070 g001 550
Figure 1. The electrocardiogram of the developing heart. The photographs are scanning electron microscope images of the developing chicken heart of the following stages: from left to right, Hamburger/Hamilton state 11, 14 and 18 correspond to 3, 4 and 5 weeks of human development, respectively. The electrocardiograms are recorded from different chickens of similar developmental stages to the corresponding photographs. These figures are courtesy of S. Virágh and G. Steding. Ap, arterial pole; vp, venous pole; V, ventricle; oft, outflow tract; avc, atrioventricular canal; A, atrium.
Figure 1. The electrocardiogram of the developing heart. The photographs are scanning electron microscope images of the developing chicken heart of the following stages: from left to right, Hamburger/Hamilton state 11, 14 and 18 correspond to 3, 4 and 5 weeks of human development, respectively. The electrocardiograms are recorded from different chickens of similar developmental stages to the corresponding photographs. These figures are courtesy of S. Virágh and G. Steding. Ap, arterial pole; vp, venous pole; V, ventricle; oft, outflow tract; avc, atrioventricular canal; A, atrium.
Jcdd 08 00070 g001
Jcdd 08 00070 g002 550
Figure 2. Phenotypes of the embryonic and adult heart (A). The embryonic myocytes in the early heart tube possess a phenotype typical for the conduction system with a high automaticity and a low conduction velocity, contractility, and sarcoplasmic reticulum activity. (B). The chambers balloon out from the initial heart tube and immediately initiate a fast conducting working myocardial phenotype. The myocardium at the venous pole, and the region interposed between the developing chambers, the atrioventricular canal, initially retains the conduction system phenotype and will form the cardiac conduction system. ra, right atria; la, left atria; oft, outflow tract; rv, right ventricle; lv, left ventricle.
Figure 2. Phenotypes of the embryonic and adult heart (A). The embryonic myocytes in the early heart tube possess a phenotype typical for the conduction system with a high automaticity and a low conduction velocity, contractility, and sarcoplasmic reticulum activity. (B). The chambers balloon out from the initial heart tube and immediately initiate a fast conducting working myocardial phenotype. The myocardium at the venous pole, and the region interposed between the developing chambers, the atrioventricular canal, initially retains the conduction system phenotype and will form the cardiac conduction system. ra, right atria; la, left atria; oft, outflow tract; rv, right ventricle; lv, left ventricle.
Jcdd 08 00070 g002
Jcdd 08 00070 g003 550
Figure 3. Distribution of drivers (focal breakthroughs, asterisk; reentry events, curved arrows) in three regions is reported as the percentage of patients (Redrawn from [40]). The pink area indicates the continuum of the left atrial dorsal wall and pulmonary veins after incorporation (for explanation see text). Note that ectopic foci are nearly absent in the roof of the left atrium.
Figure 3. Distribution of drivers (focal breakthroughs, asterisk; reentry events, curved arrows) in three regions is reported as the percentage of patients (Redrawn from [40]). The pink area indicates the continuum of the left atrial dorsal wall and pulmonary veins after incorporation (for explanation see text). Note that ectopic foci are nearly absent in the roof of the left atrium.
Jcdd 08 00070 g003
Jcdd 08 00070 g004 550
Figure 4. Atrioventricular junction and impulse propagation (A). Schematic representation of the different components of the atrioventricular junction (Inspired by [53,70]). Note that lower nodal cells share a common origin with the His bundle cells. (AV: atrioventricular) (B). In normal hearts, the electric impulses initiated by pacemaker cells in the sinoatrial node propagate through the atrial myocardium and trigger its contraction. At the atrioventricular node, the impulses are delayed for a period to facilitate alternating contraction of the atrial and ventricular myocardium. After the atrioventricular delay, the electrical impulses rapidly travel to the ventricular myocardium via the His-Purkinje system and stimulate the ventricular myocardium. In Notch1-activated and Tbx2-deficient hearts, accessory pathways are formed as a result of malformation of the atrioventricular canal myocardium, commonly right-sided in Notch1-activated mice and left-sided in Tbx2-deficient mice. Because of faster conduction through the accessory pathways than through the atrioventricular node, the ventricular myocardium is prematurely stimulated (preexcitation). The ECG shows a short PR interval, a slurred upstroke (“delta wave”) of the QRS complex and a widened QRS complex.
Figure 4. Atrioventricular junction and impulse propagation (A). Schematic representation of the different components of the atrioventricular junction (Inspired by [53,70]). Note that lower nodal cells share a common origin with the His bundle cells. (AV: atrioventricular) (B). In normal hearts, the electric impulses initiated by pacemaker cells in the sinoatrial node propagate through the atrial myocardium and trigger its contraction. At the atrioventricular node, the impulses are delayed for a period to facilitate alternating contraction of the atrial and ventricular myocardium. After the atrioventricular delay, the electrical impulses rapidly travel to the ventricular myocardium via the His-Purkinje system and stimulate the ventricular myocardium. In Notch1-activated and Tbx2-deficient hearts, accessory pathways are formed as a result of malformation of the atrioventricular canal myocardium, commonly right-sided in Notch1-activated mice and left-sided in Tbx2-deficient mice. Because of faster conduction through the accessory pathways than through the atrioventricular node, the ventricular myocardium is prematurely stimulated (preexcitation). The ECG shows a short PR interval, a slurred upstroke (“delta wave”) of the QRS complex and a widened QRS complex.
Jcdd 08 00070 g004
Jcdd 08 00070 g005 550
Figure 5. Developmental basis for RVOT arrhythmias. The adult RVOT has formed from the embryonic outflow tract (left), which is composed primary of myocardium exhibiting slow conduction and spontaneous activity. During development, the embryonic outflow tract acquires a working myocardial phenotype, e.g., fast conduction, and transforms into the RVOT. A small ring of primary myocardium, however, still remains just below the pulmonary valve, which may give rise to automaticity as seen in patients with idiopathic RVOT tachycardia. The myocardium of the free wall and septum of the adult RVOT has a working myocardial phenotype, although expression of Cx43 is lower than in the right ventricle. This may set the stage for re-entrant-based arrhythmias as seen in patients with the Brugada syndrome. Modified from [100] LV, left ventricle; RV, right ventricle; OFT, outflow tract; RVOT, right ventricular outflow tract; AO, aorta; PT, pulmonary trunk; LVOT, left ventricular outflow tract; Ca, calcium; EAD, early after depolarization; DAD, delayed after depolarization.
Figure 5. Developmental basis for RVOT arrhythmias. The adult RVOT has formed from the embryonic outflow tract (left), which is composed primary of myocardium exhibiting slow conduction and spontaneous activity. During development, the embryonic outflow tract acquires a working myocardial phenotype, e.g., fast conduction, and transforms into the RVOT. A small ring of primary myocardium, however, still remains just below the pulmonary valve, which may give rise to automaticity as seen in patients with idiopathic RVOT tachycardia. The myocardium of the free wall and septum of the adult RVOT has a working myocardial phenotype, although expression of Cx43 is lower than in the right ventricle. This may set the stage for re-entrant-based arrhythmias as seen in patients with the Brugada syndrome. Modified from [100] LV, left ventricle; RV, right ventricle; OFT, outflow tract; RVOT, right ventricular outflow tract; AO, aorta; PT, pulmonary trunk; LVOT, left ventricular outflow tract; Ca, calcium; EAD, early after depolarization; DAD, delayed after depolarization.
Jcdd 08 00070 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rivaud, M.R.; Blok, M.; Jongbloed, M.R.M.; Boukens, B.J. How Cardiac Embryology Translates into Clinical Arrhythmias. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2021, 8, 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd8060070

AMA Style

Rivaud MR, Blok M, Jongbloed MRM, Boukens BJ. How Cardiac Embryology Translates into Clinical Arrhythmias. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease. 2021; 8(6):70. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd8060070

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rivaud, Mathilde R., Michiel Blok, Monique R. M. Jongbloed, and Bastiaan J. Boukens. 2021. "How Cardiac Embryology Translates into Clinical Arrhythmias" Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 8, no. 6: 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd8060070

APA Style

Rivaud, M. R., Blok, M., Jongbloed, M. R. M., & Boukens, B. J. (2021). How Cardiac Embryology Translates into Clinical Arrhythmias. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, 8(6), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd8060070

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop