Next Article in Journal
Development of Polyampholyte Cellulose-Based Hydrogels for Diapers with Improved Biocompatibility
Previous Article in Journal
Microstructure of Sea Cucumber Parastichopus tremulus Peptide Hydrogels and Bioactivity in Caco-2 Cell Culture Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bacterial Cellulose–Silk Hydrogel Biosynthesized by Using Coconut Skim Milk as Culture Medium for Biomedical Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Hyaluronic Acid and Skin: Its Role in Aging and Wound-Healing Processes

by
Natalia Chylińska
1,* and
Mateusz Maciejczyk
2
1
Independent Laboratory of Cosmetology, Medical University of Białystok, Akademicka 3, 15-267 Bialystok, Poland
2
Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Ergonomics, Medical University of Białystok, Mickiewicza 2c, 15-022 Bialystok, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Gels 2025, 11(4), 281; https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11040281
Submission received: 15 March 2025 / Revised: 6 April 2025 / Accepted: 7 April 2025 / Published: 9 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Designing Gels for Wound Dressing)

Abstract

:
Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a linear, unbranched polysaccharide classified as a glycosaminoglycan. While HA is found in various tissues throughout the body, over half of its total proportion is found in the skin. The role of HA in the skin is complex and multifaceted. HA maintains proper hydration, elasticity, and skin firmness, serving as a key extracellular matrix (ECM) component. With age, HA production gradually decreases, leading to reduced water-binding capacity, drier and less elastic skin, and the formation of wrinkles. Additionally, HA plays an active role in the wound-healing process at every stage. This review summarizes the current background knowledge about the role of HA in skin aging and wound healing. We discuss the latest applications of HA in aging prevention, including anti-aging formulations, nutricosmetics, microneedles, nanoparticles, HA-based fillers, and skin biostimulators. Furthermore, we explore various HA-based dressings used in wound treatment, such as hydrogels, sponges, membranes, and films.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Hyaluronic acid (HA) has diverse and unique properties [1,2]. It occurs naturally in all living organisms, commonly as a sodium salt (sodium hyaluronate) [3]. It was first discovered and isolated from the vitreous body of a bovine eye in 1934 by American scientists Karl Meyer and John Palmer [4]. The name HA originates from a combination of the words hyaloid (vitreous body) and uronic acid [4,5]. HA is a significant component of the human body’s extracellular matrix (ECM). Over 50% of the total HA content in the human body is found in the skin [4,6,7]. HA is also found in the synovial membrane, articular cartilage, the vitreous body of the eye, blood vessel walls, skeletal muscle tissue, the umbilical cord, and internal organs, primarily in the kidneys and lungs [4,7]. HA performs several important biological functions [8]. Above all, it ensures the proper functioning of joints and tendons, reduces inflammation, regulates angiogenesis and tissue neovascularization, and plays a role in morphogenesis, wound healing, and cellular signaling [5,8,9,10,11,12]. In human skin, HA is a key substance that fills the ECM and is responsible for maintaining proper hydration, elasticity, and firmness of the skin [7,13,14,15].
The level of HA in the human body is not constant [7,15]. With the advancement of aging and the influence of environmental factors, especially excessive exposure to sunlight, the amount of HA significantly decreases, resulting in a loss of skin hydration, changes in its topography, the formation of wrinkles, sagging, limited joint mobility, and impaired healing of burns, scars, and wounds [7,15,16,17]. Therefore, external delivery is increasingly being used to supplement HA’s deficiencies [15]. Depending on the purpose and location of the therapy, HA may be administered in the form of intra-articular injections, as a wrinkle and skin filler, through oral supplementation, or for external application, most commonly in the form of creams, serums, or eye drops [1,14,18]. HA is also commonly used as a delivery system for drugs and active substances as well as a substance that increases their penetration through the stratum corneum [19]. HA-based preparations have been widely applied in medicine, both in aesthetic and therapeutic capacities [4,18]. Due to its versatile effects, HA is widely used in orthopedics, ophthalmology, otolaryngology, gynecology, rheumatology, aesthetic medicine, and cosmetology [4,18]. HA’s wide range of properties and numerous applications continue to drive research into understanding the exact molecular mechanism of HA’s action [20,21].
In the 1950s, HA was extracted from human umbilical cords and animal tissues, mainly from rooster combs, synovial fluid, and the skin of marine animals. Despite production optimization, these sources of HA posed significant contamination risks and often triggered allergic reactions [4]. Therefore, ever since, efforts have been made to find alternative methods for its extraction. Following the development of biotechnological methods, HA is now also produced through the fermentation of Gram-positive streptococci, namely, Streptococcus equi, and Gram-negative bacteria, i.e., Pasteurella multocida [22,23,24,25].
HA is a key material used for advanced biomedical and cosmetic applications. This is due to HA’s several properties, such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, and the ability to be chemically modified. At the same time, the unique characteristics of HA make it a promising substrate for developing new therapeutic strategies. Every year, more and more data are emerging on new potential applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, transdermal drug delivery systems, cosmetic preparations, and tissue fillers. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge on the role of HA in the skin-aging process and wound healing and present the latest applications of HA in regenerative medicine, anti-aging therapies, aesthetics, and cosmetology.

2. Structure, Properties, and Biological Functions of Hyaluronic Acid

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a linear, unbranched polysaccharide. Its chemical structure is the same in the human body and most bacteria. The hyaluronic acid molecule comprises repeating disaccharide units of D-glucuronic acid and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, connected by β-1,4 and β-1,3 glycosidic bonds [4,26,27,28]. The excellent water solubility of HA polymers is attributed to their β-1,3 glycosidic bonds [29]. It has been shown that HA molecules adopt a double left-handed helical structure in aqueous solutions, with hydrogen bonds being responsible for its stabilization [4,30].
Hyaluronic acid (HA) belongs to the group of glycosaminoglycans [5,6]. Other group members include heparin and sulfates: heparan sulfate, dermatan sulfate, keratan sulfate, and chondroitin sulfate [4]. These are polyanionic compounds that contain acidic sulfate groups. Glycosaminoglycans are bonded to proteins, forming proteoglycans (e.g., beta glycan, aggrecan, syndecan, perlecan, and decorin) [31,32,33]. One of the most important properties of glycosaminoglycans is their strong hydrophilicity and ability to increase their volume in an aqueous environment [34,35,36,37,38,39]. HA’s high osmotic activity and anionic structure enable it to bind large amounts of water [4,40,41,42]. The polymeric nature of HA, on the other hand, ensures good viscoelastic properties [43]. In addition to the mentioned characteristics, HA differs significantly from other glycosaminoglycans. Primarily, HA is a non-sulfated biopolymer [7,10]. Among all glycosaminoglycans, HA is the only one that does not form covalent bonds with the protein core [7]. Despite this, proteoglycans may bind to HA, forming proteoglycan aggregates. By attaching to HA, these aggregates fill the spaces of the extracellular matrix as an amorphous gel [7]. Unlike most glycosaminoglycans, HA is not synthesized by the Golgi apparatus and has a minimal negative charge density, as it contains only one carboxyl group [4,34,44]. HA can be chemically modified via conjugation or crosslinking reactions. These processes result in HA derivatives with improved natural retention and reduced tissue clearance compared to native HA [45,46]. Many HA derivatives with greater biological stability have been developed. One of them is a derivative of ethylenediamine (EDA) and octadecylamine (C18-NH2), referred to as HA-EDA-C18 [46].
HA’s physicochemical and biological properties largely depend on its molecular weight and the size of the molecule (Table 1) [4,37]. The greater the molecular weight of HA, the better its viscoelastic properties [37]. The naturally occurring HA in the human body has a molecular weight in the range of 105–107 Da [4,8,47]. The molecular weight of HA varies depending on its location in tissues [48]. For example, the molecular weight of HA in synovial fluid is between 6000–7000 kDa, while in joint fluid it is between 3000 and 5000 kDa [37]. HA in the epidermis constitutes approximately 0.1 mg/g of wet tissue, while in the dermis, it makes up 0.5 mg/g [29,49]. High-molecular-weight HA (HMW-HA) has a molecular weight of ≥1000 kDa, medium-molecular-weight HA (MMW-HA) has a molecular weight ranging from 250 to 1000 kDa, and low-molecular-weight HA (LMW-HA) has a molecular weight ranging from 10 to 250 kDa [50]. It has been shown that HMW-HA can have anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic effects [49,50,51]. The anti-angiogenic activity of HMW-HA results from its ability to inhibit the migration and differentiation of endothelial cells [52]. HMW-HA also reduces the production of interleukin 1-β (IL1-β), inhibits the activation of the toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling pathway, and suppresses the activity of metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), the elevated expression of which is observed in inflammatory responses [53]. Additionally, HMW-HA increases the expression of transforming growth factor-beta 3 (TGF-β3), which inhibits the scar formation process [54,55]. MMW-HA, on the other hand, enhances the expression of inflammatory factors such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) and interleukins 6 (IL-6) and 1β (IL-1β) [49]. LMW-HA also stimulates the production of inflammatory cytokines and cell proliferation and exhibits proangiogenic activity through interaction with the endothelial lymphatic vessel receptor 1. It promotes lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs), which are crucial in lymphangiogenesis [48,56,57].
The biological properties of HA also arise from its interactions with binding proteins known as hyaladherins [4,61]. The proteins that bind HA include the transmembrane glycoprotein CD44, the receptor RHAMM (receptor for hyaluronan-mediated motility), lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor-1, the intracellular adhesion molecule ICAM-1, and TLRs (toll-like receptors) [7,61,62,63,64]. The main receptor responsible for the internalization and degradation of HA is CD44 [4,65]. CD44 is found in most cells but not red blood cells [7]. CD44 binds to HA on the cell surface [65]. The CD44-HA interaction plays a crucial role in many cellular processes, including cell migration, adhesion, and the activation and extravasation of lymphocytes to areas affected by inflammation [7,66]. It has been shown that the binding of CD44 to HA activates Rho GTPase proteins. Rho GTPases play a key role in remodeling the actin cytoskeleton, which is necessary for the migration and adhesion of keratinocytes. Additionally, the activation of Rho GTPase promotes the mobilization of intracellular calcium, which is essential for keratinocyte differentiation [67]. RHAMM regulates cell-signaling pathways and stimulates the migration and proliferation of both non-cancerous and cancerous cells [62,67,68]. It has been shown that the RHAMM-HA interaction plays a role in the mobility of cells stimulated by transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) [67]. Lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor-1 is involved in the degradation of HA and its uptake by lymphatic endothelial cells, followed by its transport to lymph [4,62,69]. ICAM-1, also known as the CD54 receptor, mediates the activation of inflammatory processes and is involved in releasing HA from bodily fluids and plasma [26,62]. HA also regulates the activity of TLRs that recognize bacterial components such as lipopolysaccharides and lipopeptides and subsequently initiate the innate immune response [4,70].

3. The Role of Hyaluronic Acid (HA) in Skin Aging

3.1. Skin Aging

The skin is the human body’s largest organ, performing many physiological functions [39,71,72,73]. It is a physical barrier protecting internal organs from the harmful effects of environmental factors, such as mechanical, physical, and chemical damage [39,71,72,73]. An important component of the skin is the extracellular matrix (ECM), which fills the space between cells and is responsible for maintaining tissue integrity [74,75]. The composition of the ECM is highly varied and depends on the type of tissue and its location [76,77]. The ECM contains insoluble fibrous proteins, such as collagen and elastin, as well as glycoproteins, fibronectin, and laminin [74,75,76]. Collagen is one of the most important components of the skin’s framework. In the dermis, it forms a network of loose collagen fibers that provide structural integrity, elasticity, and strength [75]. Collagen also plays a crucial role in wound healing, facilitating the migration and proliferation of new cells, regulating inflammation, and stimulating the regeneration of damaged tissues [75,78,79,80]. Elastic fiber, on the other hand, is essential for tissue repair and allows the skin to maintain its elasticity, resilience, and resistance to mechanical injuries [77,78]. Fibronectin accelerates wound healing by facilitating cell adhesion and migration [75,81]. Laminin, on the other hand, is a key component of the cell membrane, playing an important role in maintaining skin integrity [82]. The skin matrix also contains transmembrane receptors called integrins that are involved in signal transduction and form intercellular connections and connections between cells and the ECM. Integrins bind to the cytoskeletons of skin cells, thereby serving a structural function [76,83,84,85,86]. The main component of the ECM is HA, which is characterized by its strong hydrophilic properties [7]. HA is responsible for maintaining the structural integrity of the ECM and tissue hydration and plays an important role in the wound-healing process [7,87]. HA gives the skin cushioning properties by forming network-like connections with ECM proteins [88]. As the amount of HA decreases, the skin’s susceptibility to mechanical damage increases [89]. HA, collagen, and elastin production occur in fibroblasts and keratinocytes, the most important cell types in the dermis [90]. The presence of appropriate amounts of HA, collagen, and elastin in the skin ensures its proper function and a youthful appearance [90].
The skin also plays immunological roles. It forms an extensive network of cells such as keratinocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, leukocytes, macrophages, mast cells, and Langerhans cells, as well as many soluble antimicrobial peptides, cytokines, and chemokines, that together create a unique immune system of the skin [91]. As a result, the skin regulates many important processes, such as angiogenesis, inflammation, and wound healing while also preventing pathogenic microorganism entry [92].
As we age, the efficiency of our cellular repair systems decreases, and the function of the immune system of the skin becomes less effective [93,94,95]. As a result of aging, there is a decrease in the number of skin fibroblasts and their function [90]. They synthesize smaller amounts of collagen, elastin, and HA, resulting in wrinkles, decreased elasticity and firmness of the skin, and excessive dryness [7,15,90]. The pathomechanism of skin aging is explained by various theories, often overlapping [95,96]. Nevertheless, skin aging may be intrinsic or extrinsic [96,97]. Intrinsic skin aging, often called chronological or endogenous aging, is inevitable and driven by physiological changes that occur in the skin as we age [88,89]. It is primarily regulated by genetic and hormonal factors [96]. The second type of skin aging is extrinsic aging or exogenous aging. This type of aging is influenced by environmental factors such as ultraviolet (UV) radiation, air pollution, tobacco smoke, extreme temperatures, and humidity [96]. The sun’s ultraviolet (UV) radiation causes premature skin aging, referred to as photoaging. This results in the degeneration and photo-damage of the epidermis and dermis, leading to skin pigmentation disorders, excessive keratinization of the epidermis, deep wrinkles, skin laxity, and even the development of skin cancer [96,98,99].
An important factor accelerating premature skin aging is oxidative stress [99]. Oxidative stress is responsible for the development of many age-related diseases, such as neurodegenerative diseases, cardiovascular diseases, degenerative joint changes, chronic inflammation, and diabetes [100,101,102,103]. Oxidative stress is defined as a disruption of the homeostasis between reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), singlet oxygen (1O2), superoxide radicals (O2•−), hydroxyl radicals (OH), and the antioxidant properties of the body [103,104,105]. ROS are highly reactive molecules that can oxidize cellular components of the skin, leading to protein damage, lipid peroxidation, DNA damage and mutations, and the activation of inflammatory pathways, and they contribute to skin aging, the development of cancer, and the impairment of wound healing [106,107,108]. Factors that increase ROS production in the skin include UV radiation, air pollutants such as ozone and particulate matter, cigarette smoke, a poor diet, and excessive alcohol consumption [107,109,110]. The overproduction of ROS increases the activity of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), which are responsible for remodeling the skin’s ECM [13]. The primary sources of MMPs in the skin are fibroblasts and keratinocytes. However, MMPs may also be produced by immune and endothelial cells [111]. MMPs carry out many important functions in the skin, including participating in angiogenesis, wound healing, tissue repair, and ECM remodeling [112]. However, the overproduction of MMPs may damage ECM proteins such as collagen and elastin [113]. In UV-damaged skin, the expression of MMPs, particularly MMP1 and MMP12, significantly increases [13,112]. The primary protease that degrades type I and III collagen is collagenase 1, also known as MMP1 [13]. On the other hand, macrophage elastase MMP12 is capable of degrading elastin and other ECM components, including laminin, fibronectin, and type I and IV collagen [13]. The activity of MMPs is regulated by specific tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs). TIMPs include proteases (TIMP1, TIMP2, TIMP3, and TIMP4), the primary function of which is to inhibit the activity of MMPs [114,115]. Excessive MMP activity relative to that of TIMPs causes disturbances in tissue remodeling [95,111]. Skin aging also influences protein glycation—a non-enzymatic reaction between sugars and proteins. As a result, advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) are formed, which are involved in oxidative stress and inflammation. AGEs interact with the ECM and damage the structural proteins of the skin [95,116]. AGEs bind to the receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE), which plays a crucial role in tissue damage and the progression of various diseases. The interaction between AGEs and RAGE activates the nuclear transcription factor NF-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway, leading to increased ROS production and exacerbating oxidative stress. This promotes inflammation and cellular damage [95,117].

3.2. Hyaluronic Acid in Skin Aging

HA, as the main component of the ECM, plays a key role in skin aging. It is estimated that a 70 kg human body contains as much as 15 g of HA in the form of sodium hyaluronate, with more than half of the HA reserves located in the skin [4]. Approximately one-third of the total HA pool undergoes degradation and is replaced by newly synthesized HA [118]. Skin HA is produced by enzymatic proteins called hyaluronan synthases (HASs) in two types of cells: fibroblasts and keratinocytes [13,15,39,118]. There are three subtypes of hyaluronan synthases (HAS1, HAS2, and HAS3), each involved in the synthesis of HA with different chain lengths [15,39,119,120]. It is worth noting that fibroblasts primarily use the HAS2 synthase, while epidermal keratinocytes use both HAS2 and HAS3 to an equal extent [15]. The HAS1 and HAS2 proteins are responsible for the production of HMW-HA, while HAS3 is responsible for the production of LMW-HA [121].
Interestingly, temperature significantly affects the degradation and synthesis kinetics of HA. Elevated temperatures accelerate HA degradation through increasing the activity of enzymes such as hyaluronidase [122,123]. At the same time, heating can reduce the activity of HA synthases by destabilizing their structures and decreasing HA production [122,124]. One study showed that after 24 h of exposure to high temperatures and pH levels, the molecular weight of HA decreased from 753 kDa to 36 kDa [122].
Until recently, it was believed that HA was not present in the epidermis [39]. Following the development of histochemical analysis techniques, HA’s presence in this skin layer was confirmed [39]. However, the amount of HA in the epidermis is significantly lower compared to that in the dermis [7,125]. The related literature data also indicate the different localization of hyaluronan in the individual layers of the epidermis [126,127]. In most of the related studies, it has been suggested that HA is not present in the stratum corneum of the epidermis [126]. Tammi et al. demonstrated that hyaluronan is primarily localized in the middle prickle layer. It is not found in the granular and horny layers, with only a small amount of HA existing in the basal layer [126]. Sakai et al. studied the expression of mRNA of HAS1 and HAS2 synthases in mouse skin using mRNA in situ hybridization. They found that both mRNAs are expressed in the granular and horny layers of the epidermis [128].
In the dermis, HA is found both in the papillary and reticular layers, with a greater amount found in the papillary layer [7,129]. Adiponectin is responsible for stimulating HA synthesis in dermal fibroblasts. Adiponectin is a cytokine produced by adipose tissue cells and sebaceous glands. It has been shown that skin fibroblasts possess specific adiponectin receptors. Adiponectin, through the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) pathway and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPARα), regulates HA production by potentiating the activity of HAS2 synthase [129,130,131].
HA is highly metabolically active; its synthesis is accompanied by a continuous process of its breakdown [125]. It has been found that the rate of HA degradation depends on HA’s location. The biological half-life of HA is 3–5 min in the blood, approximately 12 h in the skin, and 1–3 weeks in cartilage [7,125]. The degradation of HA in the skin occurs as a result of the action of hyaluronidase, a hydrolytic enzyme that depolymerizes HA, or through the action of ROS [4,125]. Six types of hyaluronidases have been identified in the human body: hyaluronidase-1, hyaluronidase-2, hyaluronidase-3, hyaluronidase-4, and sperm adhesion molecule 1 [4,132,133]. The greatest hydrolytic activity is primarily exhibited by hyaluronidase-1 and hyaluronidase-2 [132,133]. Hyaluronidase enzymes break down HA chains into smaller fragments that are then further cleaved by β-D-glucuronidase and β-N-acetyl-hexosaminidase [4].
In young skin, the amount of HA is optimal, which ensures good elasticity, firmness, and proper hydration levels. However, the physiological loss of HA begins quite early, with the age of 25 generally considered the threshold [134]. Longas et al. showed that the average HA concentration in the skin is 0.3 mg/g of wet tissue in the 19–47 age group. This concentration decreases with age, reaching 0.15 mg/g of wet tissue at the age of 60 and 0.07 mg/g of wet tissue in 75-year-olds [135]. Interestingly, HA is homogeneously distributed in young skin, forming a complex network connected to collagen and elastin fibers. In senile skin, HA deposits were absent in the intercellular and pericellular areas of the dermis, indicating a loss of structural integrity [136]. There is also a lack of data on the impact of skin aging on the molecular weight of HA. However, Holmes et al. revealed a gradual decrease in the size of HA polymers in articular cartilage with age. The molecular weight of HA was 2.0–3.0 × 106 Da in the articular cartilage of 2.5-year-old children, while in a group of 86-year-olds, it was only 0.5 × 106 Da. This indicates a progressive reduction in polymer size associated with the aging process [137].
Both intrinsic and extrinsic aging cause significant degradation of HA, leading to a range of clinical signs of skin aging [7,111]. These symptoms include excessive dryness, the formation of wrinkles, and the loss of the firmness and elasticity of the skin [7,111]. In the case of chronologically aged skin, a reduced amount of HA-binding protein (HABP) has been observed in the dermis. HABP is a protease that, through the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) ERK1/2 and Pi3K/Akt signaling pathways, promotes the migration and proliferation of fibroblasts [134,138]. However, the level of HA does not undergo drastic changes [7]. Interestingly, the most significant loss of HA occurs in the epidermis, while the amount in the dermis does not change significantly [7]. It has been found that the loss of HA in the process of intrinsic aging is also associated with a decrease in the activity of HAS1 and HAS2 as well as CD44 and RHAMM [7]. It is believed that the decrease in HA synthesis during aging may also be a result of elevated levels of non-coding molecules like miR23-3p. It has been shown that miR23-3p binds to the untranslated region (3’UTR) of mRNA located downstream of the coding sequence, which leads to a reduction in the expression of HAS2 and, consequently, a decrease in fibroblast proliferation and HA synthesis [139].
Although photoaging is known to be responsible for premature skin aging, the research results regarding changes in HA metabolism in photo-damaged skin are inconclusive [15,39]. Relatively few studies have been conducted on healthy volunteers regarding the role of HA in photoaging induced by UV radiation. Averbeck et al. have demonstrated that in skin exposed to UVB radiation, the level of HA increases in the epidermis, while the amount of HA in the dermis decreases due to the reduced expression of HAS1 and HAS2 in this layer [15]. Interestingly, a statistically significant increase in the concentration of HA fragments with a molecular weight <100 kDa was observed in the interstitial fluid of the dermis 24 h after UVB exposure (95.85 ± 40.09 ng/mL) compared to the control group (4.809 ± 1.264 ng/mL) [140]. Another in vivo study has shown that UVB radiation increases the concentration of chondroitin sulfate in the dermis but not HA itself [15]. Importantly, it has been observed that in skin exposed to UV radiation, where damage to the basement membrane occurs, the amount of HA in the epidermis is reduced compared to that in skin protected from the sun and young skin exposed to sunlight with an intact basement membrane [15]. It has been hypothesized that the basement membrane maintains HA levels in the epidermis [15]. Most authors agree that when skin is exposed to UV radiation, there is a decrease in the activity of HAS1 and HAS2. Changes in the activity of hyaluronidase can also be observed. In UV-exposed skin, the levels of hyaluronidase-1, hyaluronidase-2, hyaluronidase-3, and the hyaluronan-binding protein (CEMIP) increase. These changes are suspected to lead to an increase in the catabolism of HA [15]. In vivo studies on mouse models have shown that in skin exposed to UVB radiation, the concentration of HA is lower in the papillary dermis compared to that in skin protected from the sun [15,141]. Interestingly, LMW-HA is mainly present in skin exposed to UV light [15,141]. Additionally, HA produced during photoaging (LMW-HA) cannot bind enough water [15]. Indeed, HMW-HA has a higher hydration potential than LMW-HA. HMW-HA’s water-binding mechanism is related to the ability of this molecule to form numerous hydrogen bonds with water, which is also influenced by the presence of numerous polar groups such as hydroxyl (-OH), carboxyl (-COOH), and acetamide (-NHCOCH3). Molecular dynamic simulations have shown that the number of hydrogen bonds possible increases with the length of the polymer chain. Additionally, HMW-HA chains show the ability to self-organize into a three-dimensional supramolecular network stabilized by non-covalent bonds, increasing the ability to bind water [142].

3.3. Hyaluronic Acid in Anti-Aging Prevention

HA is widely used in clinical medicine, aesthetic medicine, and cosmetology [51]. Numerous studies have confirmed the safety and effectiveness of HA in improving skin hydration and reducing visible signs of aging [14,134,143,144]. HA is one of the most popular ingredients in cosmetic products and tissue fillers, commonly used for restoring volume lost over the course of aging [145]. However, many researchers are increasingly emphasizing the beneficial role of HA supplementation in improving skin quality and appearance [4,51]. The uses of hyaluronic acid in aesthetic medicine and cosmetology are shown in Figure 1.

3.3.1. Anti-Aging Products

Currently, HA is widely used in the cosmetics industry [146,147]. HA’s rheological, viscoelastic, and hygroscopic properties have made it a key active ingredient in many cosmetics [146,147]. Sodium and potassium hyaluronate are widely used in moisturizing products intended for facial and body care as well as in eye-area treatments and anti-wrinkle cosmetics [14,144]. HA is commonly used in creams, gels, serums, masks, and lotions [14,144]. In cosmetic formulations, HA may be used as a standalone ingredient or in combination with excipients that facilitate its penetration into deeper layers of the skin, such as liposomes [14,134,143]. HA in cosmetic products is often combined with other bioactive ingredients, particularly amino acids, peptides, vitamins, plant extracts, and probiotics, to enhance its effect or provide additional benefits for the skin [14]. The concentration of HA in cosmetics typically ranges from 0.2% to 1% [14]. HA’s different biological effects in cosmetic products depend on its molecular weight [14,148]. High-molecular-weight HA has demonstrated the ability to form an occlusive film on the skin’s surface, preventing transepidermal water loss (TEWL) in the epidermis and protecting against the adverse effects of external factors while also contributing to the maintenance of proper hydration levels [14]. However, HMW-HA does not penetrate the deeper layers of the skin. LMW-HA exhibits better permeability to both the epidermis and the dermis [148]. Therefore, iontophoresis, electroporation, and microneedles can improve HA’s penetration through the stratum corneum. Iontophoresis increases the diffusion of therapeutic substances/active ingredients through the skin [149]. This method involves the use of a low-voltage direct current, which is necessary to move charged particles through the skin. Inoue et al. evaluated the effectiveness of iontophoresis in delivering HMW-HA with a molecular weight of 600–1600 kDa [150]. They showed that iontophoresis enabled HMW-HA to penetrate the skin [150]. Fluorescent labeling showed the presence of HMW-HA in the epidermis (up to 100 μm) and in the dermis (over 200 μm). There was no significant fluorescence in the control group, where HMW-HA was applied to the surface of skin without iontophoresis, indicating that HMW-HA does not cross the epidermal barrier on its own [150]. Electroporation is another method that allows active substances to penetrate the skin. It involves the use of brief electrical impulses to create temporary pores in the cell membrane, which facilitate the transport of a variety of substances into the skin [151]. HA penetration was shown to be greater with a combination of electroporation and iontophoresis compared to iontophoresis alone. It was observed that the maximum molecular weight of HA that was able to penetrate the skin was 200 kDa [152]. Cosmetic products can also contain combinations of HA with different molecular weights, balancing HA’s penetration and biological activity [50].
The mechanisms of action and penetration of HA through the skin, depending on its molecular weight, are presented in Table 2. HA also plays a valuable role in anti-aging [14]. It delays the skin-aging process, reduces wrinkles, and prevents the formation of new wrinkles by improving water retention in the skin, limiting water loss, smoothing the texture of the skin, and strengthening the skin’s structure [14]. Clinical studies have evaluated the effectiveness of topical HA preparations with different molecular weights (50, 130, 300, 800, and 2000 kDa). The use of HA with molecular weights of 50 and 130 kDa was shown to have contributed to a significant reduction in wrinkles, which may have been due to the ability of low-molecular-weight HA to penetrate the deeper layers of the epidermis [153].

3.3.2. Tissue Fillers

The use of aesthetic medicinal procedures is gaining increasing interest in regard to anti-aging therapies [161]. A particularly sought-after procedure among minimally invasive treatments is the injection of tissue fillers. HA-based fillers are clinically indicated for soft tissue augmentation, nasolabial fold and wrinkle correction, and lip enhancement, including volume restoration and vermilion border contouring [144,161]. These preparations are characterized by good water-binding properties that help increase the volume of soft tissues [162]. Crosslinked HA is the most popular and effective ingredient in tissue fillers [161]. Non-cross-linked HA has a short half-life, usually ranging from 1 to 2 days [10,163]. When dissolved in water, HA forms a sticky solution that does not fulfill the role of a skin filler [10,163]. It quickly degrades by hyaluronidase and does not stay in the injection site [164]. In order to extend durability and improve elasticity, various HA production technologies and crosslinking methods are used [10,163]. Products containing crosslinked HA may be classified into monophasic or biphasic, depending on the method of crosslinking [162]. Monophasic fillers are based on a homogeneous gel of crosslinked HA, which ensures greater stability at the injection site and reduces the susceptibility of HA to enzymatic breakdown [155]. Biphasic products consist of stabilized HA molecules in the form of a gel dispersed in a non-crosslinked HA solution [162]. The effects of using HA fillers usually last from 6 to 12 months after injection [10]. Recent studies indicate that HA fillers, depending on the type of product used, can last longer, even up to 15 years [165]. However, further studies are required to confirm the long-term effects of HA. Tissue fillers based on HA have a high safety profile [166]. However, side effects may occur after use, as with all products in cosmetology and aesthetic medicine [166]. However, they are usually short-term, mild, and transient [166,167]. The main complications associated with the injection of tissue fillers containing HA include pain, swelling, itching, bruising, and hypersensitivity reactions [166,167]. These side effects are often due to an immune response caused by the contaminants present in HA formulations, such as proteins, nucleic acids, bacterial endotoxins, or heavy metals [168,169]. Purified HA or HA produced by recombinant bacteria is used to minimize the severity of allergic or unwanted immune reactions [168,169]. Ultrafiltration and diafiltration are particularly preferred methods for purifying HA due to their selectivity and efficiency [169]. Ultrafiltration involves the use of semipermeable membranes that retain large particles and allow smaller ones to pass through [169]. After ultrafiltration, diafiltration is used to remove contaminants by exchanging the solvent and gradually rinsing out unwanted substances, thus yielding high-purity HA [169]. Other methods of purifying HA include centrifugation, precipitation, and chromatographic techniques (size-exclusion chromatography and high-pressure liquid chromatography) [169]. HA is also produced using biotechnological methods in which genetically modified microorganisms, such as Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, with a status recognized as safe (GRAS) synthesize HA in a controlled environment [21,51]. Compared to traditional methods, HA produced by recombinant microorganisms poses a reduced risk of contamination [21,51]. For polymeric materials such as HA, it is necessary to determine the characteristic parameters according to the Pharmacopoeia, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), or International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Each product should have a specification with approved analytical methods and acceptance criteria to confirm its safety before clinical use [170]. Chung et al. have proposed a skin test for HA-containing products to minimize allergic reactions [171]. However, the time required to interpret the results can be as long as 3–4 weeks. This skin test is particularly recommended for patients who have previously experienced adverse reactions to HA fillers. In case of a positive result, the patient should not undergo treatment with the same preparation again. However, it should be noted that the skin test does not entirely eliminate the risk of adverse reactions, which can be caused by concomitant factors such as infection [171].
In rare situations, hazardous complications related to blood vessels may occur, which may pose a threat to health and life [166]. Among these complications, skin necrosis, ischemic stroke, and vision loss are distinguished as the severe ones [166,167]. Vascular complications after the use of HA-based dermal fillers result from vascular compression due to pressure placed on the vessel by the filler material [151]. Impaired blood flow is the result of vessel occlusion [167]. Vascular complications are characterized by a rapid course, leading to irreversible changes [167]. Therefore, an operator with a thorough knowledge of anatomy, early recognition of the signs and symptoms of vascular complications, and immediate implementation of treatment may help avoid dangerous health consequences [167].

Cross-Linking of Hyaluronic Acid

Various HA crosslinking methods, including chemical, physical, and enzymatic methods, are used to extend HA-based hydrogels’ durability and improve their elasticity and ability to resist enzymatic degradation [10,163].
HA chemical cross-linking involves the use of various chemicals, such as 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether (BDDE), divinyl sulfone (DVS), glutaraldehyde (GTA), and 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl carbodiimide/N-hydroxysuccinimide (EDC/NHS) [172,173]. HA’s most common crosslinking agent is BDDE [10,162,163]. The reaction of BDDE epoxide groups with HA hydroxyl groups in an alkaline environment forms ether bonds that crosslink HA molecules through 1,4-butylene bridges, forming a three-dimensional structure [174]. It has been shown that ether bonds ensure there is significant clinical durability while maintaining biodegradability [175,176]. Unreacted BDDE is non-toxic when its concentration in the end product does not exceed 2 ppm [177]. BDDE is widely used in tissue fillers and injectable hydrogels [176]. DVS is a less commonly used chemical cross-linking agent [10,162,163]. DVS reacts at room temperature, thereby minimizing HA’s degradation in alkaline solutions compared to methods requiring elevated temperatures [172]. DVS’s high reactivity leads to the formation of ether bonds in a reproducible process without using organic solvents [172]. Unlike BDDE, DVS is highly toxic [163]. GTA was once a common crosslinking agent due to its ability to increase the stability and effectiveness of crosslinking [173,178]. However, studies have shown that it has significant toxicity, and residual GTA can reduce the biocompatibility of gels [173]. Another HA cross-linking agent is EDC/NHS. EDC/NHS is crucial for forming amide bonds between HA’s carboxyl groups and other molecules’ amino groups [179]. The EDC/NHS cross-linking method has been used in tissue engineering and the creation of drug carriers [179].
In contrast to chemical cross-linking, the physical cross-linking of HA hydrogels involves the use of non-covalent interactions, such as hydrogen bonds, electrostatic interactions, and the entanglement of the polymer chain, to form a three-dimensional network [172,180]. Physical stimuli modulate these reversible interactions: temperature, pH, and ionic bonds [172,180]. Physically cross-linked HA hydrogels are usually characterized by high biocompatibility and are used in various biomedical applications, particularly in tissue engineering, drug delivery systems, and wound healing [172,180].
Enzymatic crosslinking involves the use of enzymes, mainly horseradish peroxidase (HRP), to form covalent bonds between HA molecules [172]. Although enzymatic crosslinking is a highly biocompatible method, it can lead to variations in gelling kinetics between different batches of material [172]. Enzymatically cross-linked HA hydrogels are used in wound healing, tissue engineering, and drug delivery systems [172].

3.3.3. Skin Biostimulants

The dynamic development of aesthetic medicine has contributed to the development of new methods used in anti-aging medicine [181]. One of the most popular anti-aging treatments is skin stimulation using biostimulants [181,182]. In contrast to tissue fillers, the role of skin biostimulants is not to increase tissue volume and fill wrinkles but to naturally rebuild and regenerate aging skin [181,182]. The action of skin biostimulants involves stimulating fibroblast activity to produce collagen and elastin [181]. The effects of the procedure are not immediate and usually become visible gradually after several treatments [182]. The frequency of using skin biostimulants varies and depends on the type of product used, the condition of the patient’s skin, and the aesthetic goal [183]. A particular advantage of these products is their ability to yield natural results in terms of improved hydration, firmness, and skin thickening without altering facial features [182]. A common ingredient in tissue stimulators is non-crosslinked HA combined with other substances such as polynucleotides (Mastelli Nevest®, Milano, Italy); amino acids, including glycine, L-proline, L-lysine, L-valine, and L-leucine (Sunekos 200®, Milano, Italy); L-polylactic acid (Juvelook®, Seoul, Republic of Korea); and 1% calcium hydroxyapatite (Neuvia Stimulate®, Geneve, Switzerland) [183,184,185,186,187,188,189]. Few studies have evaluated HA’s effectiveness as an agent stimulating neocollagenesis [184,190]. However, a recent study has shown that the use of non-crosslinked HA in a skin biostimulator exhibited stimulating effects [184]. Optical coherence tomography was used to assess collagen density, allowing for the examination of skin layers up to a depth of 2 mm. Optical coherence tomography imaging was performed before skin stimulator injection and at 1, 2, and 3 months post-injection. A progressive increase in collagen density was observed, even up to 3 months after a single injection [184]. Further studies are necessary to confirm the effectiveness of HA in skin biostimulation [190].

3.3.4. Microneedles

Microneedles (MNs) constitute an innovative transdermal system that allows the delivery of hydrophilic (such as HA) and hydrophobic substances by mechanically disrupting the stratum corneum. MNs are small structures ranging from 25 μm to 2000 μm. They have diverse shapes, and they can be made of different materials (metal, ceramics, silicon, and biodegradable polymers) [191,192,193]. Depending on their mechanisms of action, structures, and materials, MNs are divided into solid, hollow, coated, hydrogel, and soluble MNs [191,193]. MNs have a wide range of applications, ranging from the transdermal administration of pharmaceuticals such as vaccines, proteins, and immunological drugs to diagnostic and cosmetic applications [194,195]. Studies have shown that composite MNs with nanocarriers increase the effectiveness of drug loading and improve therapeutic efficacy [196]. This technology is a promising alternative to traditional methods such as injections or topical preparations, providing a non-invasive and effective route for transdermal drug delivery [195].
HA is a very common material used for the production of soluble MNs due to its properties, such as biodegradability and biocompatibility [196]. Soluble HA MNs dissolve in the skin. Therefore, they do not generate sharp waste, reducing the risk of infection [196]. While hyaluronic acid (HA) is a natural carboxyl group-containing polymer, the hyaluronic acid-based microneedle patch (HA-MNP) system provides a transient acidic microenvironment with oxygen reduction at the administration site. These conditions inhibit the degradation and dimerization of many drugs and active substances [191]. In addition, HA MNs have the ability to encapsulate and stabilize sensitive biological particles [191]. HA MNs can be modified by adding other active substances to them, such as peptides, to improve skin condition [193]. HA MNs are also used in dermatology to aid in the treatment of diseases such as psoriasis and melasma and to promote wound healing [193]. HA MNs are also being researched for their potential as drug delivery systems in anti-cancer therapy [193]. Several methods for preparing soluble HA MNs include micro-molding, photopolymerization, drawing lithography, and, most commonly, solvent casting [196]. Lu et al. used HA MNs as a system for the controlled release of a therapeutic complex consisting of lipoic acid (LA) and the self-organizing peptide RADA16-YIGSR (RY) in the treatment of diabetic wounds [197]. The HA (RY/LA) MN system led to increased collagen synthesis after 14 days (67.25%), which can be compared to the value of 25.84% in the control group, indicating faster wound healing. HA (RY/LA) MNs also reduced the survival rate of Escherichia coli to 10.2% and that of Staphylococcus aureus to 9.1%. After 48 h of HA (RY/LA) MN application, a 2-fold increase in endothelial cell migration (HUVEC) and the formation of numerous tubular structures were observed, indicating proangiogenic effects [197].

3.3.5. HA-Based Nanoparticles

Nanotechnology, one of the fastest-growing fields of science, is widely used in cosmetology, pharmacy, and medicine [198]. Lipid-based nanoformulations such as liposomes, niosomes, ethosomes, polymeric micelles, solid lipid nanoparticles, nanostructured lipid carriers, and nanoemulsions serve as carriers for therapeutic substances [46,198]. They enable controlled drug release, action targeted at a specific destination, and increased penetration into the skin. Many studies have shown that HA-coated nanoparticles are highly effective in delivering poorly water-soluble drugs and ensuring their controlled release [46,199,200].
Liposomes are vesicles composed of phospholipid bilayers, the size of which can range from 30 nm to several micrometers. Liposomes have unique properties as drug carriers, making them widely used in pharmacy and medicine [198,201,202]. Liposomes are biocompatible and protect the substances they contain from physiological degradation, thus extending their half-lives and allowing for controlled release [201,202,203]. In cosmetics, liposomes are most often used as carriers of fragrances in deodorants, antiperspirants, and various moisturizing products [204,205]. Chang et al. evaluated the effectiveness of HA-modified cationic liposomes in enhancing skin penetration and retention. They found that LMW-HA with molecular weights of 5 kDa and 8 kDa could penetrate the dermis. Cationic liposomes containing undecylenoylphenylalanine coated with 5 kDa HA showed 5.4-times greater penetration and 4.9-times greater retention in the skin compared to undecylenoylphenylalanine alone, which is a skin-brightening agent [143]. HA-modified liposomes also significantly advance targeted drug delivery systems [46,202,206]. Coating liposomes with HA significantly increases the effectiveness of drug encapsulation. Due to the affinity of HA for CD44 receptors, which are overexpressed in some cancer cells, HA-modified liposomes enable a drug to be delivered directly to the tumor, thus increasing therapeutic efficacy [46,206].
Ethosomes are lipid carriers consisting of phospholipids and ethanol or isopropanol, usually in a concentration of 20–50% [207,208]. Compared to liposomes, they are more effective at penetrating the epidermal barrier, which allows them to deliver drugs to deeper layers of the skin [207,209,210]. In pharmacy, they are used to deliver antibiotics, painkillers, hormones, or anti-inflammatory drugs [207,210]. Ethosomes are also commonly used in cosmetics as carriers of active ingredients such as HA. The encapsulation of HA in ethosomes increases its biodegradability and protects it from enzymatic degradation [211,212].
Niosomes are small vesicles made of non-ionic surfactants. The bilayer structures of niosomes allow the encapsulation of different compounds, i.e., amphiphilic, hydrophilic, and lipophilic compounds [213,214]. Niosomes are more stable and bioavailable and less toxic compared to other carriers. Hanieh et al. prepared HA- and cholesterol-coated (HA-Chol) niosomes. They showed that the HA-Chol coating improved the niosomes’ stability, allowing for controlled release and selective delivery of drugs to specific cells, particularly cancer cells [215].
Polymeric micelles integrating HA are self-organizing nanoparticles with a core–shell structure. They encapsulate hydrophobic drugs in their cores, while their hydrophilic HA shells ensure water solubility and colloidal stability [216,217]. Šmejkalová et al. evaluated the effectiveness of polymeric micelles integrating hydrophobized HA in the local delivery of drugs through the skin [218]. The polymeric micelles integrating HA led to a 3-fold higher drug concentration in the epidermis and a 6-fold higher concentration in the dermis than conventional non-micellar systems [218].
Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) are composed of solid lipids, usually between 50 and 1000 nm in size [219]. The lipid core surrounds the drug, ensuring its controlled release and protection against degradation. The modification of solid lipid particles with HA (HA-SLN) improves their ability to target specific cells [46,219,220]. This is due to the affinity of HA for CD44 and RHAMM receptors, which are overexpressed in tumor and inflammatory cells [46,219].
Nanostructured HA-modified lipid carriers (HA-NLCs) consist of solid and liquid lipids. This hybrid structure allows for a greater drug-loading capacity and better release control compared to conventional carriers [46,221].
Nanoemulsions are colloidal dispersion systems of the oil-in-water (o/w) or water-in-oil (w/o) type. The small size of nanoemulsions, in the 20–200 nm range, facilitates their effectiveness as drug carriers [222,223]. Nanoemulsions are used in many cosmetic formulations, including body lotions, sunscreens, anti-aging, and whitening preparations. They help rebuild the hydrolipid barrier, making them particularly suitable for dry-skin care [204,224]. Kong et al. evaluated the skin penetration, safety, and bioavailability of nanoemulsions containing HA as a carrier for lipophilic α-tocopherol. It was shown that HA nanoemulsions are safe and have better permeability through the stratum corneum compared to ethanol [225].

3.3.6. Nutricosmetics

Although HA is primarily an ingredient in topical products, it is also a common component in nutricosmetics [144]. Nutricosmetics constitute a subcategory of dietary supplements intended to improve the appearance of the skin, hair, and nails [226]. The main purpose of nutricosmetics is to supplement deficiencies in nutrients that may cause excessive dryness and roughness of the skin, loss of elasticity, and premature skin aging [226]. Nutricosmetics have various effects depending on the type of nutrients they contain. They may improve skin hydration, act in a antioxidative capacity, strengthen the skin’s structural integrity, and exhibit photoprotective properties [226,227]. Supplements with HA are available in the form of tablets, capsules, powder, or liquid [227]. Regarding nutricosmetics, HA is most often combined with other essential skin ingredients such as collagen, vitamins, minerals, and plant extracts [14,226]. According to the related literature, HA supplementation improves quality and elasticity, increases skin hydration, and reduces the expression of wrinkles [227]. It has been shown that different doses and molecular weights of HA benefit the skin, and the effectiveness of nutricosmetics primarily depends on regular use [227]. However, further studies are required to confirm the effectiveness of HA in oral supplementation and determine the optimal dose and form of HA [14].

4. Hyaluronic Acid in Wound Healing

Wound healing is a multifaceted physiological process, the duration of which depends on the type and size of the injury [8]. Wound healing begins with hemostasis, during which blood clotting and fibrinolysis occur [54,228,229,230]. Blood clotting is initiated through two pathways: the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways. The extrinsic pathway is triggered by tissue factor (TF) that is released from the damaged blood vessel. TF then binds to factor VIIa (proconvertin) and activates factor X (Stuart–Prower factor). In the intrinsic pathway, factor XII (Hageman factor) is activated, which subsequently activates factor XI (antihemophilic factor C). This activation then stimulates factor IX (antihemophilic factor B) and factor VIIIa (antihemophilic factor A), further stimulating factor X. Both pathways converge at the activation of factor X and factor Xa, forming the common pathway. As a result of factor Xa activation and factor Va (proaccelerin), prothrombin is converted into thrombin. Thrombin plays a key role in hemostasis, particularly in converting fibrinogen into fibrin, leading to clot formation [228,229,230,231]. Fibrinolysis is the process whereby blood clots dissolve in blood vessels. It is initiated by tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA), which convert plasminogen into plasmin, leading to the degradation of fibrin [232].
Next, the inflammatory phase occurs, which is crucial in wound healing. During the inflammatory phase, the immune system is activated. Neutrophils accumulate at the wound site, recognizing and phagocytizing pathogens, while macrophages promote tissue repair [233]. The next stage is the migration and proliferation of fibroblasts to the wound site. During this phase, the tissue defects are filled with granulation tissue rich in blood vessels, fibroblasts, and collagen fibers. The final stage consists of remodeling and scar formation [88].
Many studies have shown that HA actively participates in all the stages of wound healing. The focus has primarily been on the impact of HA on the process of angiogenesis [55]. The interaction of HA with CD44 and RHAMM receptors, as well as with immune system cells, induces the production of many compounds crucial for the healing process [55,234]. Among these compounds, cytokines are crucial, including TGF-β, transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-α), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-8, and many others initiated during the inflammatory phase [234]. TLR2 and TLR4, as well as lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor-1, bind to HA and play a significant role in the healing process. The interaction between HA and TLRs causes LMW HA to exhibit proinflammatory properties [26,234,235].
In the hemostasis phase, HMW-HA accumulates in the wound bed and then binds to fibrin and fibronectin, forming a temporary scaffold that facilitates the accumulation of fibroblasts and inflammatory cells such as lymphocytes, neutrophils, and macrophages [62].
The amount of HA synthesized significantly increases during the inflammatory phase [88]. The unique properties of HA, especially its hydrophilicity, allow for the passive diffusion of water into the interstitial space. As a result, edema forms around the wound, and chemotaxis of inflammatory cells occurs. Fragments of HA with low or medium molecular weights activate the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines, TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-8, which influence the dilation of blood vessels, leading to redness of the skin and increased warmth at the site of the injury [62,88]. A key role in inflammation is also played by the HA-binding protein known as TNF-stimulated gene 6 (TSG-6) and the serine protease inhibitor (IαI). As a result of the interaction between the TSG-6/IαI complex and HA, the inflammatory phase is attenuated through a cascade of proteases and MMPs, which leads to the migration of neutrophils and the inhibition of plasmin, an active component of the fibrinolytic system [62,88,236]. The inflammatory phase and the associated symptoms are essential elements in the proper regeneration of the skin and wound healing [88].
HA also plays an important role in the proliferative phase. During this stage, fibroblasts migrate to the site of the wound. This process is facilitated by small fragments of HA consisting of 6–20 saccharides and growth factors [26,62,88]. Subsequently, fibroblasts produce glycosaminoglycans and collagen that facilitate ECM remodeling [88]. HA also significantly influences neovascularization [11]. The involvement of HA in angiogenesis depends on its molecular weight [51]. HMW-HA inhibits angiogenesis, whereas LMW-HA exhibits proangiogenic effects [55]. Additionally, LMW-HA supports the epidermalization phase. This is related to the interaction of CD44 in endothelial cells with HA oligomers. Activated endothelial cells stimulate the processes of migration, granulation, and the formation of new blood vessels [237].
In the remodeling phase, as a result of fibroblast activity, the edges of a wound contract [62]. In this phase, HA also plays an important role. Primarily, it integrates with CD44. The activation of CD44 stimulates cells derived from mesenchyme, referred to as myofibroblasts. Myofibroblasts are characterized by their ability to move and their capacity to produce ECM components [237,238]. They constitute one of the key elements that condition a proper wound-healing process. Primarily, they facilitate the closure of a wound [12]. Moreover, they are responsible for the production of MWM-HA, most often with a molecular weight of approximately 480 kDa [235]. LMW-HA enhances the expression of TGF-β1 and TGF-β2, which are responsible for scar formation. On the other hand, HMW-HA increases the expression of TGF-β3, which is involved in inhibiting the scarring process [61].

4.1. Preparations Containing Hyaluronic Acid Used in Wound Treatment

Due to its strong tissue dehydration prevention properties, effectiveness in supporting and accelerating the regeneration of damaged skin structures, and biocompatibility and low cytotoxicity, HA is increasingly used as an ingredient in wound-healing preparations. HA is used in various types of dressings, such as hydrogels, sponges, films, and electrospun membranes, as well as in creams and foams [26,239] (Figure 1). HA is used in wound dressings to maintain a moist environment within the damaged tissue, reduce the production of proinflammatory cytokines (↑TNF-α, ↑IL-1β, and ↑monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1)), intensify the expression of growth factors (↑TGF-β, ↑platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), ↑growth-regulated oncogene alpha (GRO-α), ↑vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), ↑fibroblast growth factor (FGF), ↑hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), ↑insulin-like growth factor (IGF), and ↑fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2)), stimulate cell migration and proliferation (↑TGF-α), improve granulation, and enhance the formation of blood vessels [237,240] (Figure 2). Many clinical studies have confirmed the positive effects of using various types of HA dressings in wound healing, particularly for postoperative wounds and chronic ulcers. They are more effective but also more expensive than standard wound treatment strategies, limiting their widespread use [241]. In order to reduce production costs, it is important to increase fermentation efficiency, which can be achieved by optimizing breeding conditions and using genetically modified microorganisms [242]. Ferreira et al. analyzed the economics of HA production via Streptococcus zooepidemicus fermentation [242]. They compared batch fermentation and fermentation with feed-batch substrate dosing [242]. It was proven that feed-batch fermentation leads to a higher HA concentration (5.0 g/L) compared to the batch method (2.5 g/L). The authors also showed that the use of feed-batch fermentation reduced production costs (USD 946/kg) compared to batch fermentation (USD 1115/kg) [242].
IL-1β: Interleukin-1 beta; FGF: fibroblast growth factor; FGF2: fibroblast growth factor 2; GRO-α: growth-regulated oncogene alpha; HGF: hepatocyte growth factor; IGF: insulin-like growth factor; MCP-1: monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; MMPs: matrix metalloproteinases; PDGF: platelet-derived growth factor; TGF-β: transforming growth factor beta; TIMP: tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase; TGF-α: transforming growth factor alpha; TNF- α: tumor necrosis factor alpha; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor.

4.1.1. Hydrogels

HA is one of the common ingredients in hydrogel dressings. HA-based hydrogels are three-dimensional polymer networks consisting of randomly linked HA chains. Compared to natural ECM, HA-based hydrogels are characterized by lower structural complexity and limited functional diversity [243]. Hydrogel dressings are widely used in wound healing due to their hydrophilicity, biodegradability, and cytocompatibility [243,244]. In hydrogel dressings, HA facilitates tissue regeneration by accelerating the stages of wound healing. Additionally, HA reduces inflammation during the inflammatory phase, stimulates angiogenesis during the proliferative phase, and enhances collagen deposition during the remodeling phase [244]. HA is most commonly used in hydrogel dressings for treating chronic wounds, such as ulcers or pressure sores [245]. However, there are certain limitations associated with the use of HA-based hydrogels. These include the poor mechanical strength of the resultant gels and the rapid degradation of HA [239]. Thus, to accelerate the healing process, the HA in hydrogel dressings is often combined with EGF or other biomaterials. EGF also promotes tissue regeneration through cell stimulation and proliferation [246]. Chemical modifications and crosslinking with synthetic polymers are also used in HA-based hydrogels, significantly helping to overcome the mentioned limitations [239]. Gong et al. were the first to propose a new hydrogel class combining one rigid and strong network with another soft and elastic one, forming dual-crosslinked hydrogels. In this type of system, two independent networks formed through different types of chemical and physical crosslinking coexist within a single hydrogel, maintaining structural separation [247]. The structural integrity of hydrogels can be increased through crosslinking with synthetic polymers such as polyacrylamide (PA) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) [248]. The synthetic polymers mixed into the hydrogel form intermolecular bonds that strengthen the structure of the material [248]. PA increases the mechanical strength of hydrogels due to its ability to form strong covalent bonds [248,249]. PVA, on the other hand, forms hydrogen bonds that can make hydrogel flexible [248,250]. In order to inhibit the enzymatic degradation of HA, Lee et al. proposed adding tannic acid and polyethylene glycol (PEG) diglycidyl ether to crosslinked HA hydrogels. Due to its hydroxyl groups, tannic acid forms additional hydrogen bonds with the diglycidyl ether of PEG, which contributes to the enhancement of the physicochemical properties of a hydrogel [251].
The interactions and kinetics of HA release in polymer hydrogels constitute a significant challenge that requires further research and optimization. An uncontrolled or excessively rapid release of active substances can decrease therapeutic efficacy [3]. The use of gradient polymer systems can be an effective approach to regulating the diffusion of medicinal substances in HA-based hydrogels. Gradient hydrogels are characterized by their anisotropic structures, and their properties vary spatially [252]. In the case of gradient hydrogels, the release kinetics can be optimized by controlling the differences in the drug concentration in the polymer matrix. This enables a more even release of the active substance in the later stages [253]. One of the most promising solutions for controlling the release of substances is the use of stimuli-responsive hydrogels. Intelligent hydrogels react to factors such as pH, light, temperature, or enzymes and glucose [254]. Physical crosslinking is often preferred due to the reversibility of supramolecular interactions [255].

4.1.2. HA-Based Sponges

For acute and chronic wounds, HA-based sponges (HylaSponge®) may be used [246]. The sponges’ porous structures and swelling ability allow maintaining a moist environment within the wound and absorbing excess exudate. In order to keep the sponges in place on a wound, additional dressings or bandages are required [256]. HA is also combined with other polymers, such as chitosan, to improve the mechanical properties of HA-based sponges [257]. Chitosan is biocompatible and has an antimicrobial effect. Chitosan-HA composites constitute a material with better mechanical properties [257]. Mohandas et al. created VEGF-coated fibrin nanoparticles and introduced them into a chitosan-HA composite sponge intended as a dressing for diabetic wounds [257]. The related literature data indicate that the use of HA sponges with a zinc system significantly reduces scarring in patients after breast surgery [245,258,259]. HA-based sponges combined with chitosan and nanosilver have shown effectiveness in treating diabetic foot ulcers among patients infected with antibiotic-resistant bacteria [257]. Catanzano et al. developed a composite alginate–HA sponge dressing loaded with tranexamic acid [260]. Alginate has hemostatic properties. Therefore, HA-and-alginate sponges can effectively heal wounds and reduce bleeding after tooth extractions [260]. HA-and-aloe-based sponges are beneficial in the case of burns and diabetic ulcers [261]. Foam dressings are used for chronic wounds with moderate or heavy exudate [262]. They do not adhere to the wound bed and support epithelialization [262,263]. Kim et al. modified HA dressings by introducing methacrylic acid (MAA) groups [264]. It has been shown that MAA-containing HA dressings (HAMA) accelerate the wound-healing process [264]. These dressings ensure high absorption of exudate [264].

4.1.3. Hyaluronate-Based Dressings

Hyaff-11® is a technology primarily developed for tissue-engineering purposes [265]. By esterifying the free carboxyl group of glucuronic acid with benzyl alcohol, a polymer of the HA derivative, called benzyl ester of HA, was obtained [266]. A unique feature of this polymer is its biodegradability and improved stability compared to native HA, all while retaining HA’s biological properties [265,267]. In a clinical study involving 180 participants, the effectiveness of autologous skin grafts cultured on scaffolds made of benzyl ester HA (Hyaff) was evaluated with respect to the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Nonadherent paraffin gauze was used in the control group (90 participants). In the treatment group (90 participants), an autologous skin graft was applied using tissue-engineering methods (Hyalograft-3D), and after 2 weeks, an epidermal autograft (Laserskin) was applied. After 12 weeks, it was found that the healing process progressed similarly in both groups. However, in the treatment group, the reduction in the ulcer area occurred faster (40 days) than in the control group (50 days). After 20 weeks, 50% of the treatment group achieved ulcer healing, while only 43% of the control group had healed ulcers. Further studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness of Hyaff scaffolds for patients with ulcers at other locations [268].
Transparent HA films (Hyalosafe®) are another type of dressing using Hyaff-11. They are used in the treatment of superficial wounds with moderate exudate as well as for first- and second-degree burns. These HA films are designed to create a moist environment necessary for healing and provide a physical barrier to protect a wound from infection [245,267]. The transparency of the films allows for constant observation of the wound, while their non-adherence to the skin surface prevents discomfort for the patient and ensures painless removal [269].
Transparent silicone membranes (Hyalomatrix®) containing a bilayered esterified HA may also be used for wound healing. They provide a protective and flexible cover for wounds and control water vapor loss. They are used for dressing pressure ulcers, second-degree burns, diabetic ulcers, and surgical and traumatic wounds [245,269]. In a study involving 10 participants with hard-to-heal wounds, the effectiveness of Hyalomatrix was evaluated. It was shown to reduce inflammatory symptoms in all patients [270].

4.1.4. HA Creams and Gels for Wounds

HA is also a common ingredient in creams used for the treatment of wounds and burns [266,268]. HA creams provide a moist environment within the wound, support cell migration, and promote faster regeneration of damaged tissue [256]. It has been shown that the use of a 0.2% sodium salt of HA with 1% silver sulfadiazine (Connettivina Plus®) improves the healing of second-and third-degree pressure ulcers afflicting patients with chronic lesions [256,271]. In a randomized clinical trial, the effectiveness of Connettivina Plus was compared to that of Fitostimoline® cream, which contained wheat extract as its main ingredient. Both preparations were shown to be effective in the treatment of acute superficial wounds, with better results observed for Fitostimoline. Both preparations also had high safety profiles [272].
HA gels used for wounds typically contain 2.5% sodium hyaluronate (Hylase®). They are suitable for exudative wounds prone to bleeding and minor cuts. They prevent tissue dehydration and support the wound-healing process [256].

5. Conclusions and Prospects

In this review, we have summarized the current knowledge regarding the role of hyaluronic acid (HA) in skin aging and wound healing and presented the latest applications of HA in cosmetology, aesthetic medicine, and regenerative medicine. HA is a common ingredient in many types of cosmetics, dietary supplements, tissue fillers, and wound dressings. In cosmetics, HA exhibits anti-wrinkle and moisturizing effects. However, HA’s impact on the skin depends on its molecular weight. HMW-HA does not penetrate the deeper layers of the skin but forms a protective film that prevents transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and has moisturizing properties. LMW-HA penetrates the dermis better, which is why it exhibits anti-wrinkle effects. HA is increasingly being used in dietary supplements aimed at improving skin quality. However, few studies have evaluated the effectiveness and safety of oral HA supplementation. Randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm the effects and safety of oral HA supplementation. Determining the optimal dose and molecular weight of HA for improving skin hydration and elasticity is also essential. HA is a key ingredient in fillers and skin biostimulators in aesthetic medicine. HA-based fillers have a high safety profile and are becoming more widely used for aesthetic purposes. HA biostimulators represent a promising new approach to skin rejuvenation, acting by stimulating fibroblasts to produce collagen. However, there is a limited number of studies evaluating the effectiveness of HA-based skin biostimulators in influencing neocollagenesis. Further studies, including controlled clinical trials, are necessary to confirm HA’s stimulating effect and evaluate the long-term effects of HA biostimulators on the skin. HA is also widely used in wound healing. It influences the migration of keratinocytes and fibroblasts, which are crucial in the healing process; enables the maintenance of a moist environment; and stimulates growth factors. Advances in technology have led to the development of innovative HA-based dressings, such as Hyaff-11 scaffolds and hydrogels, the effectiveness of which has been confirmed in clinical trials. HA has also become a popular material for targeted drug delivery systems.
The prospects for HA in regard to aging and wound-healing processes are promising. HA’s wide range of properties, particularly its biocompatibility and biodegradability, have made it a key polymer in regenerative medicine, cosmetics, and tissue engineering. Intensive research into making chemical modifications of HA to improve enzymatic degradation rates, biological integration, and biomechanical properties has expanded its applications in various biomedical fields. Innovations in HA applications, such as new delivery systems for drugs and active ingredients, are continually emerging. However, further research is needed to expand knowledge related to its cellular and molecular mechanisms and optimization for the application of HA in the skin. Advances in HA research could significantly improve patients’ aesthetic and health outcomes in the future.

Author Contributions

N.C.: conceptualization, data curation, writing—original draft, and preparation of tables and figures. M.M.: conceptualization, supervision, and writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of this manuscript.

Funding

The authors declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Support was provided by the Medical University of Białystok, Poland (Grant No. B.SUB.25.250).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vasvani, S.; Kulkarni, P.; Rawtani, D. Hyaluronic Acid: A Review on Its Biology, Aspects of Drug Delivery, Route of Administrations and a Special Emphasis on Its Approved Marketed Products and Recent Clinical Studies. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 151, 1012–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dicker, K.T.; Gurski, L.A.; Pradhan-Bhatt, S.; Witt, R.L.; Farach-Carson, M.C.; Jia, X. Hyaluronan: A Simple Polysaccharide with Diverse Biological Functions. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10, 1558–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wójcik-Pastuszka, D.; Skrzypczyk, A.; Musiał, W. The Interactions and Release Kinetics of Sodium Hyaluronate Implemented in Nonionic and Anionic Polymeric Hydrogels, Studied by Immunoenzymatic ELISA Test. Pharmaceutics 2021, 14, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fallacara, A.; Baldini, E.; Manfredini, S.; Vertuani, S. Hyaluronic Acid in the Third Millennium. Polymers 2018, 10, 701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Buckley, C.; Murphy, E.J.; Montgomery, T.R.; Major, I. Hyaluronic Acid: A Review of the Drug Delivery Capabilities of This Naturally Occurring Polysaccharide. Polymers 2022, 14, 3442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lierova, A.; Kasparova, J.; Filipova, A.; Cizkova, J.; Pekarova, L.; Korecka, L.; Mannova, N.; Bilkova, Z.; Sinkorova, Z. Hyaluronic Acid: Known for Almost a Century, but Still in Vogue. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Papakonstantinou, E.; Roth, M.; Karakiulakis, G. Hyaluronic Acid: A Key Molecule in Skin Aging. Dermatoendocrinol. 2012, 4, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Litwiniuk, M.; Krejner, A.; Speyrer, M.S.; Gauto, A.R.; Grzela, T. Hyaluronic Acid in Inflammation and Tissue Regeneration. Wounds 2016, 28, 78–88. [Google Scholar]
  9. Munjal, A.; Hannezo, E.; Tsai, T.Y.C.; Mitchison, T.J.; Megason, S.G. Extracellular Hyaluronate Pressure Shaped by Cellular Tethers Drives Tissue Morphogenesis. Cell 2021, 184, 6313–6325.e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fakhari, A.; Berkland, C. Applications and Emerging Trends of Hyaluronic Acid in Tissue Engineering, as a Dermal Filler and in Osteoarthritis Treatment. Acta Biomater. 2013, 9, 7081–7092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Raines, A.L.; Sunwoo, M.; Gertzman, A.A.; Thacker, K.; Guldberg, R.E.; Schwartz, Z.; Boyan, B.D. Hyaluronic Acid Stimulates Neovascularization during the Regeneration of Bone Marrow after Ablation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2011, 96, 575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Abdalla, S.; Makhoul, G.; Duong, M.; Chiu, R.C.J.; Cecere, R. Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogel Induces Neovascularization and Improves Cardiac Function in a Rat Model of Myocardial Infarction. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2013, 17, 767–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Galvez-Martin, P.; Soto-Fernandez, C.; Romero-Rueda, J.; Cabañas, J.; Torrent, A.; Castells, G.; Martinez-Puig, D. A Novel Hyaluronic Acid Matrix Ingredient with Regenerative, Anti-Aging and Antioxidant Capacity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 4774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Juncan, A.M.; Moisă, D.G.; Santini, A.; Morgovan, C.; Rus, L.L.; Vonica-țincu, A.L.; Loghin, F. Advantages of Hyaluronic Acid and Its Combination with Other Bioactive Ingredients in Cosmeceuticals. Molecules 2021, 26, 4429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Šínová, R.; Pavlík, V.; Ondrej, M.; Velebný, V.; Nešporová, K. Hyaluronan: A Key Player or Just a Bystander in Skin Photoaging? Exp. Dermatol. 2022, 31, 442–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Damodarasamy, M.; Johnson, R.S.; Bentov, I.; Maccoss, M.J.; Vernon, R.B.; Reed, M.J. Hyaluronan Enhances Wound Repair and Increases Collagen III in Aged Dermal Wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2014, 22, 521–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pavelka, K.; Horváth, R.; Hurnáková, J.; Saracino, L.; Giordan, N.; Procházková, L.; Moster, E.; Dokoupilová, E. Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Intra-Articular Injection of HYALGO in the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis Symptoms: A Multicenter Prospective Study. J. Clin. Orthop. Trauma 2021, 19, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huynh, A.; Priefer, R. Hyaluronic Acid Applications in Ophthalmology, Rheumatology, and Dermatology. Carbohydr. Res. 2020, 489, 107950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schafer, N.; Balwierz, R.; Biernat, P.; Ochędzan-Siodłak, W.; Lipok, J. Natural Ingredients of Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems as Permeation Enhancers of Active Substances through the Stratum Corneum. Mol. Pharm. 2023, 20, 3278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jabbari, F.; Babaeipour, V.; Saharkhiz, S. Comprehensive Review on Biosynthesis of Hyaluronic Acid with Different Molecular Weights and Its Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 240, 124484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ucm, R.; Aem, M.; Lhb, Z.; Kumar, V.; Taherzadeh, M.J.; Garlapati, V.K.; Chandel, A.K. Comprehensive Review on Biotechnological Production of Hyaluronic Acid: Status, Innovation, Market and Applications. Bioengineered 2022, 13, 9645–9661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sze, J.H.; Brownlie, J.C.; Love, C.A. Biotechnological Production of Hyaluronic Acid: A Mini Review. 3 Biotech 2016, 6, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Smallman, T.R.; Williams, G.C.; Harper, M.; Boyce, J.D. Genome-Wide Investigation of Pasteurella Multocida Identifies the Stringent Response as a Negative Regulator of Hyaluronic Acid Capsule Production. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0019522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Flores-Gatica, M.; Castañeda-Aponte, H.; Gil-Garzon, M.R.; Mora-Galvez, L.M.; Banda-Magaña, M.P.; Jáuregui-Jáuregui, J.A.; Torres-Acosta, M.A.; Mayolo-Deloisa, K.; Licona-Cassani, C. Primary Recovery of Hyaluronic Acid Produced in Streptococcus equi Subsp. zooepidemicus Using PEG–Citrate Aqueous Two-Phase Systems. AMB Express 2021, 11, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zakeri, A.; Rasaee, M.J.; Pourzardosht, N. Enhanced Hyluronic Acid Production in Streptococcus Zooepidemicus by over Expressing HasA and Molecular Weight Control with Niscin and Glucose. Biotechnol. Rep. 2017, 16, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Marinho, A.; Nunes, C.; Reis, S. Hyaluronic Acid: A Key Ingredient in the Therapy of Inflammation. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Di Mola, A.; Landi, M.R.; Massa, A.; D’Amora, U.; Guarino, V. Hyaluronic Acid in Biomedical Fields: New Trends from Chemistry to Biomaterial Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hascall, V.C. The Journey of Hyaluronan Research in the Journal of Biological Chemistry. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 1690–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Valachová, K.; Hassan, M.E.; Šoltés, L. Hyaluronan: Sources, Structure, Features and Applications. Molecules 2024, 29, 739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Scott, J.E.; Cummings, C.; Brass, A.; Chen, Y. Secondary and Tertiary Structures of Hyaluronan in Aqueous Solution, Investigated by Rotary Shadowing-Electron Microscopy and Computer Simulation. Hyaluronan Is a Very Efficient Network-Forming Polymer. Biochem. J. 1991, 274 Pt 3, 699–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ricard-Blum, S. Glycosaminoglycans: Major Biological Players. Glycoconj. J. 2017, 34, 275–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Berdiaki, A.; Neagu, M.; Tzanakakis, P.; Spyridaki, I.; Pérez, S.; Nikitovic, D. Extracellular Matrix Components and Mechanosensing Pathways in Health and Disease. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, Q.; Chi, L. The Alterations and Roles of Glycosaminoglycans in Human Diseases. Polymers 2022, 14, 5014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kolaříková, A.; Kutálková, E.; Hrnčiřík, J.; Ingr, M. Hyaluronan Oligosaccharides Form Double-Helical Duplexes in Water:1,4-Dioxane Mixed Solvent. Carbohydr. Polym. 2024, 326, 121632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sugár, D.; Agócs, R.; Tatár, E.; Tóth, G.; Horváth, P.; Sulyok, E.; Szabó, A.J. The Contribution of Skin Glycosaminoglycans to the Regulation of Sodium Homeostasis in Rats. Physiol. Res. 2018, 67, 777–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kaczmarek, B.; Sionkowska, A.; Skopinska-Wisniewska, J. Influence of Glycosaminoglycans on the Properties of Thin Films Based on Chitosan/Collagen Blends. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2018, 80, 189–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Snetkov, P.; Zakharova, K.; Morozkina, S.; Olekhnovich, R.; Uspenskaya, M. Hyaluronic Acid: The Influence of Molecular Weight on Structural, Physical, Physico-Chemical, and Degradable Properties of Biopolymer. Polymers 2020, 12, 1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Musiał, C. Role and Application of Glycosaminoglycans in Trichology and Cosmetology. Aesthetic Cosmetol. Med. 2021, 10, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Stern, R.; Maibach, H.I. Hyaluronan in Skin: Aspects of Aging and Its Pharmacologic Modulation. Clin. Dermatol. 2008, 26, 106–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Horkay, F.; Basser, P.J.; Londono, D.J.; Hecht, A.M.; Geissler, E. Ions in Hyaluronic Acid Solutions. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131, 184902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dedic, J.; Okur, H.I.; Roke, S. Hyaluronan Orders Water Molecules in Its Nanoscale Extended Hydration Shells. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabf2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Cowman, M.K.; Lee, H.G.; Schwertfeger, K.L.; McCarthy, J.B.; Turley, E.A. The Content and Size of Hyaluronan in Biological Fluids and Tissues. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ilyin, S.O. Structural Rheology in the Development and Study of Complex Polymer Materials. Polymers 2024, 16, 2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wolf, K.J.; Kumar, S. Hyaluronic Acid: Incorporating the Bio into the Material. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 5, 3753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hintze, V.; Schnabelrauch, M.; Rother, S. Chemical Modification of Hyaluronan and Their Biomedical Applications. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 830671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Matalqah, S.; Lafi, Z.; Asha, S.Y. Hyaluronic Acid in Nanopharmaceuticals: An Overview. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 10444–10461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gallo, N.; Nasser, H.; Salvatore, L.; Natali, M.L.; Campa, L.; Mahmoud, M.; Capobianco, L.; Sannino, A.; Madaghiele, M. Hyaluronic Acid for Advanced Therapies: Promises and Challenges. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 117, 134–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. González-Rico, J.; Quílez, C.; López, V.; Muñoz-Barruti1, A.; Jorcano, J.L.; Velasco, D. The role of hyaluronic acid and versican in the skin extracellular matrix. Biomecánica 2019, 27, 35–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lee, B.M.; Park, S.J.; Noh, I.; Kim, C.H. The Effects of the Molecular Weights of Hyaluronic Acid on the Immune Responses. Biomater. Res. 2021, 25, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Juhaščik, M.; Kováčik, A.; Huerta-Ángeles, G. Recent Advances of Hyaluronan for Skin Delivery: From Structure to Fabrication Strategies and Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 4833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Iaconisi, G.N.; Lunetti, P.; Gallo, N.; Cappello, A.R.; Fiermonte, G.; Dolce, V.; Capobianco, L. Hyaluronic Acid: A Powerful Biomolecule with Wide-Ranging Applications—A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Slevin, M.; West, D.; Kumar, P.; Rooney, P.; Kumar, S. Hyaluronan, Angiogenesis and Malignant Disease. Int. J. Cancer 2004, 109, 793–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Jou, I.M.; Wu, T.T.; Hsu, C.C.; Yang, C.C.; Huang, J.S.; Tu, Y.K.; Lee, J.S.; Su, F.C.; Kuo, Y.L. High Molecular Weight Form of Hyaluronic Acid Reduces Neuroinflammatory Response in Injured Sciatic Nerve via the Intracellular Domain of CD44. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B App. Biomater. 2021, 109, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. McKeown-Longo, P.J.; Higgins, P.J. Hyaluronan, Transforming Growth Factor β, and Extra Domain A-Fibronectin: A Fibrotic Triad. Adv. Wound Care 2021, 10, 137–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kawano, Y.; Patrulea, V.; Sublet, E.; Borchard, G.; Iyoda, T.; Kageyama, R.; Morita, A.; Seino, S.; Yoshida, H.; Jordan, O.; et al. Wound Healing Promotion by Hyaluronic Acid: Effect of Molecular Weight on Gene Expression and in Vivo Wound Closure. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Paduch, R. The Role of Lymphangiogenesis and Angiogenesis in Tumor Metastasis. Cellular Oncology 2016, 39, 397–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sun, M.; Puri, S.; Mutoji, K.N.; Coulson-Thomas, Y.M.; Hascall, V.C.; Jackson, D.G.; Gesteira, T.F.; Coulson-Thomas, V.J. Hyaluronan Derived From the Limbus Is a Key Regulator of Corneal Lymphangiogenesis. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019, 60, 1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tavianatou, A.G.; Caon, I.; Franchi, M.; Piperigkou, Z.; Galesso, D.; Karamanos, N.K. Hyaluronan: Molecular Size-Dependent Signaling and Biological Functions in Inflammation and Cancer. FEBS. J. 2019, 286, 2883–2908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Migliorini, F.; Maffulli, N.; Nijboer, C.H.; Pappalardo, G.; Pasurka, M.; Betsch, M.; Kubach, J. Comparison of Different Molecular Weights of Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Level I Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Miescher, I.; Wolint, P.; Opelz, C.; Snedeker, J.G.; Giovanoli, P.; Calcagni, M.; Buschmann, J. Impact of High-Molecular-Weight Hyaluronic Acid on Gene Expression in Rabbit Achilles Tenocytes In Vitro. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shigeishi, H.; Higashikawa, K.; Takechi, M. Role of Receptor for Hyaluronan-Mediated Motility (RHAMM) in Human Head and Neck Cancers. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 140, 1629–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Olczyk, P.; Komosińska-Vassev, K.; Winsz-Szczotka, K.; Kuźnik-Trocha, K.; Olczyk, K. Hyaluronan: Structure, Metabolism, Functions, and Role in Wound Healing. Postepy Hig. Med. Dosw. 2008, 62, 651–659. [Google Scholar]
  63. Misra, S.; Hascall, V.C.; Markwald, R.R.; Ghatak, S. Interactions between Hyaluronan and Its Receptors (CD44, RHAMM) Regulate the Activities of Inflammation and Cancer. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Johnson, L.A.; Jackson, D.G. Hyaluronan and Its Receptors: Key Mediators of Immune Cell Entry and Trafficking in the Lymphatic System. Cells 2021, 10, 2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bourguignon, L.Y.W. Matrix Hyaluronan-Activated CD44 Signaling Promotes Keratinocyte Activities and Improves Abnormal Epidermal Functions. Am. J. Pathol. 2014, 184, 1912–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Siegelman, M.H.; DeGrendele, H.C.; Estess, P. Activation and Interaction of CD44 and Hyaluronan in Immunological Systems. J. Leukoc. Biol. 1999, 66, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Samuel, S.K.; Hurta, R.A.R.; Spearman, M.A.; Wright, J.A.; Turley, E.A.; Greenberg, A.H. TGF-Beta 1 Stimulation of Cell Locomotion Utilizes the Hyaluronan Receptor RHAMM and Hyaluronan. J. Cell Biol. 1993, 123, 749–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Day, A.J.; Prestwich, G.D. Hyaluronan-binding proteins: Tying up the giant. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 4585–4588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jiang, D.; Liang, J.; Noble, P.W. Hyaluronan as an Immune Regulator in Human Diseases. Physiol. Rev. 2011, 91, 221–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Cyphert, J.M.; Trempus, C.S.; Garantziotis, S. Size Matters: Molecular Weight Specificity of Hyaluronan Effects in Cell Biology. Int. J. Cell. Biol. 2015, 2015, 563818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chuong, C.M.; Nickoloff, B.J.; Elias, P.M.; Goldsmith, L.A.; Macher, E.; Maderson, P.A.; Sundberg, J.P.; Tagami, H.; Plonka, P.M.; Thestrup-Pedersen, K.; et al. What Is the “true” Function of Skin? Exp. Dermatol. 2002, 11, 159–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Dąbrowska, A.K.; Spano, F.; Derler, S.; Adlhart, C.; Spencer, N.D.; Rossi, R.M. The Relationship between Skin Function, Barrier Properties, and Body-dependent Factors. Skin Res. Technol. 2018, 24, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Maranduca, A.M.; Hurjui, L.L.; Branisteanu, D.C.; Serban, D.N.; Branisteanu, D.E.; Dima, N.; Serban, I.L. Skin—A Vast Organ with Immunological Function (Review). Exp. Ther. Med. 2020, 20, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Yue, B. Biology of the Extracellular Matrix: An Overview. J. Glaucoma 2014, 23, S20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kular, J.K.; Basu, S.; Sharma, R.I. The Extracellular Matrix: Structure, Composition, Age-Related Differences, Tools for Analysis and Applications for Tissue Engineering. J. Tissue Eng. 2014, 5, 2041731414557112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Theocharis, A.D.; Skandalis, S.S.; Gialeli, C.; Karamanos, N.K. Extracellular Matrix Structure. Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 2016, 97, 4–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sun, B. The Mechanics of Fibrillar Collagen Extracellular Matrix. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2021, 2, 100515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Gardeazabal, L.; Izeta, A. Elastin and Collagen Fibres in Cutaneous Wound Healing. Exp. Dermatol. 2024, 33, e15052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mathew-Steiner, S.S.; Roy, S.; Sen, C.K. Collagen in Wound Healing. Bioengineering 2021, 8, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Gajbhiye, S.; Wairkar, S. Collagen Fabricated Delivery Systems for Wound Healing: A New Roadmap. Biomater. Adv. 2022, 142, 213152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Gimeno-Lluch, I.; Benito-Jardón, M.; Guerrero-Barberà, G.; Burday, N.; Costell, M. The Role of the Fibronectin Synergy Site for SkinWound Healing. Cells 2022, 11, 2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Rousselle, P.; Michopoulou, A. Laminin 332 in Junctional Epidermolysis and as an Autoantigen in Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid. In Blistering Diseases: Clinical Features, Pathogenesis, Treatment; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kostourou, V.; Goult, B.T.; Ambriović-Ristov, A. Editorial: Integrin Adhesion Receptors in Health and Disease. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2023, 11, 1149920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Hynes, R.O. Integrins: Bidirectional, Allosteric Signaling Machines. Cell 2002, 110, 673–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Pang, X.; He, X.; Qiu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Xie, R.; Liu, Z.; Gu, Y.; Zhao, N.; Xiang, Q.; Cui, Y. Targeting Integrin Pathways: Mechanisms and Advances in Therapy. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Karamanos, N.K.; Theocharis, A.D.; Piperigkou, Z.; Manou, D.; Passi, A.; Skandalis, S.S.; Vynios, D.H.; Orian-Rousseau, V.; Ricard-Blum, S.; Schmelzer, C.E.H.; et al. A Guide to the Composition and Functions of the Extracellular Matrix. FEBS J. 2021, 288, 6850–6912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Widgerow, A.D.; Ziegler, M.E.; Garruto, J.A.; Mraz Robinson, D.; Palm, M.D.; Vega, J.H.; Bell, M. Designing Topical Hyaluronic Acid Technology—Size Does Matter. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2022, 21, 2865–2870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Frenkel, J.S. The Role of Hyaluronan in Wound Healing. Int. Wound J. 2014, 11, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Larkina, S.A.; Oleynik, N.N.; Vastyanov, R.S. Hyaluronic Acid Suppresses Age Related Skin Changes. J. Educ. Health Sport 2017, 7, 821–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Fisher, G.J.; Wang, B.; Cui, Y.; Shi, M.; Zhao, Y.; Quan, T.; Voorhees, J.J. Skin Aging from the Perspective of Dermal Fibroblasts: The Interplay between the Adaptation to the Extracellular Matrix Microenvironment and Cell Autonomous Processes. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2023, 17, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Abdallah, F.; Mijouin, L.; Pichon, C. Skin Immune Landscape: Inside and Outside the Organism. Mediators Inflamm. 2017, 2017, 5095293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Cioce, A.; Cavani, A.; Cattani, C.; Scopelliti, F. Role of the Skin Immune System in Wound Healing. Cells 2024, 13, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Van Beek, J.H.G.M.; Kirkwood, T.B.L.; Bassingthwaighte, J.B. Understanding the Physiology of the Ageing Individual: Computational Modelling of Changes in Metabolism and Endurance. Interface Focus 2016, 6, 20150079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Sunderkötter, C.; Kalden, H.; Luger, T.A. Aging and the Skin Immune System. Arch. Dermatol. 1997, 133, 1256–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Dorf, N.; Maciejczyk, M. Skin Senescence—From Basic Research to Clinical Practice. Front. Med. 2024, 11, 1484345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Bocheva, G.; Slominski, R.M.; Slominski, A.T. Neuroendocrine Aspects of Skin Aging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ganceviciene, R.; Liakou, A.I.; Theodoridis, A.; Makrantonaki, E.; Zouboulis, C.C. Skin Anti-Aging Strategies. Dermatoendocrinol 2012, 4, 308–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Tanveer, M.A.; Rashid, H.; Tasduq, S.A. Molecular Basis of Skin Photoaging and Therapeutic Interventions by Plant-Derived Natural Product Ingredients: A Comprehensive Review. Heliyon 2023, 9, e13580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Qian, H.; Shan, Y.; Gong, R.; Lin, D.; Zhang, M.; Wang, C.; Wang, L. Mechanism of Action and Therapeutic Effects of Oxidative Stress and Stem Cell-Based Materials in Skin Aging: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 10, 1082403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Liguori, I.; Russo, G.; Curcio, F.; Bulli, G.; Aran, L.; Della-Morte, D.; Gargiulo, G.; Testa, G.; Cacciatore, F.; Bonaduce, D.; et al. Oxidative Stress, Aging, and Diseases. Clin. Interv. Aging 2018, 13, 757–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Maciejczyk, M.; Zalewska, A.; Gerreth, K. Salivary Redox Biomarkers in Selected Neurodegenerative Diseases. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Klran, T.R.; Otlu, O.; Karabulut, A.B. Oxidative Stress and Antioxidants in Health and Disease. J. Lab. Med. 2023, 47, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Pizzino, G.; Irrera, N.; Cucinotta, M.; Pallio, G.; Mannino, F.; Arcoraci, V.; Squadrito, F.; Altavilla, D.; Bitto, A. Oxidative Stress: Harms and Benefits for Human Health. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2017, 2017, 8416763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Arfin, S.; Jha, N.K.; Jha, S.K.; Kesari, K.K.; Ruokolainen, J.; Roychoudhury, S.; Rathi, B.; Kumar, D. Oxidative Stress in Cancer Cell Metabolism. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Berdiaki, A.; Neagu, M.; Spyridaki, I.; Kuskov, A.; Perez, S.; Nikitovic, D. Hyaluronan and Reactive Oxygen Species Signaling-Novel Cues from the Matrix? Antioxidants 2023, 12, 824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Juan, C.A.; de la Lastra, J.M.P.; Plou, F.J.; Pérez-Lebeña, E. The Chemistry of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Revisited: Outlining Their Role in Biological Macromolecules (DNA, Lipids and Proteins) and Induced Pathologies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Sarandy, M.M.; Gonçalves, R.V.; Valacchi, G. Cutaneous Redox Senescence. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Sanchez, M.C.; Lancel, S.; Boulanger, E.; Neviere, R. Targeting Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in the Treatment of Impaired Wound Healing: A Systematic Review. Antioxidants 2018, 7, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Papaccio, F.; D’arino, A.; Caputo, S.; Bellei, B. Focus on the Contribution of Oxidative Stress in Skin Aging. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Chen, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Qiu, J. Oxidative Stress in the Skin: Impact and Related Protection. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2021, 43, 495–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Shin, J.W.; Kwon, S.H.; Choi, J.Y.; Na, J.I.; Huh, C.H.; Choi, H.R.; Park, K.C. Molecular Mechanisms of Dermal Aging and Antiaging Approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Löffek, S.; Schilling, O.; Franzke, C.W. Series “Matrix Metalloproteinases in Lung Health and Disease”: Biological Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases: A Critical Balance. Eur. Respir. J. 2011, 38, 191–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Freitas-Rodríguez, S.; Folgueras, A.R.; López-Otín, C. The Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases in Aging: Tissue Remodeling and Beyond. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2017, 1864, 2015–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Maciejczyk, M.; Pietrzykowska, A.; Zalewska, A.; Knaś, M.; Daniszewska, I. The Significance of Matrix Metalloproteinases in Oral Diseases. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2016, 25, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Tandara, A.A.; Mustoe, T.A. MMP- and TIMP-Secretion by Human Cutaneous Keratinocytes and Fibroblasts–Impact of Coculture and Hydration. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2011, 64, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Rinnerthaler, M.; Bischof, J.; Streubel, M.K.; Trost, A.; Richter, K. Oxidative Stress in Aging Human Skin. Biomolecules 2015, 5, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Moura, F.A.; Goulart, M.O.F.; Campos, S.B.G.; da Paz Martins, A.S. The Close Interplay of Nitro-Oxidative Stress, Advanced Glycation End Products and Inflammation in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Curr. Med. Chem. 2020, 27, 2059–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Marunaka, K.; Shu, S.; Kobayashi, M.; Goto, M.; Katsuta, Y.; Yoshino, Y.; Ikari, A. Elevation of Hyaluronan Synthase by Magnesium Supplementation Mediated through the Activation of GSK3 and CREB in Human Keratinocyte-Derived HaCaT Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 23, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Kobayashi, T.; Chanmee, T.; Itano, N. Hyaluronan: Metabolism and Function. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Weigel, P.H.; Hascall, V.C.; Tammi, M. Hyaluronan Synthases. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 13997–14000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Bao, X.; Ran, J.; Kong, C.; Wan, Z.; Wang, J.; Yu, T.; Ruan, S.; Ding, W.; Xia, L.; Zhang, D. Pan-Cancer Analysis Reveals the Potential of Hyaluronate Synthase as Therapeutic Targets in Human Tumors. Heliyon 2023, 9, e19112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. de Melo, B.A.G.; Santana, M.H.A. Structural Modifications and Solution Behavior of Hyaluronic Acid Degraded with High PH and Temperature. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2019, 189, 424–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Faivre, J.; Wu, K.; Gallet, M.; Sparrow, J.; Bourdon, F.; Gallagher, C.J. Comparison of Hyaluronidase-Mediated Degradation Kinetics of Commercially Available Hyaluronic Acid Fillers In Vitro. Aesthet. Surg. J. 2024, 44, NP402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Maffucci, I.; Laage, D.; Sterpone, F.; Stirnemann, G. Thermal Adaptation of Enzymes: Impacts of Conformational Shifts on Catalytic Activation Energy and Optimum Temperature. Chemistry 2020, 26, 10045–10056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Žádníková, P.; Šínová, R.; Pavlík, V.; Šimek, M.; Šafránková, B.; Hermannová, M.; Nešporová, K.; Velebný, V. The Degradation of Hyaluronan in the Skin. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Tammi, R.; Ripellino, J.A.; Margolis, R.U.; Tammi, M. Localization of Epidermal Hyaluronic Acid Using the Hyaluronate Binding Region of Cartilage Proteoglycan as a Specific Probe. J. Investig. Dermatol. 1988, 90, 412–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Laurent, T.C.; Fraser, J.R.E. Hyaluronan1. FASEB J. 1992, 6, 2397–2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Sakai, S.; Yasuda, R.; Sayo, T.; Ishikawa, O.; Inoue, S. Hyaluronan Exists in the Normal Stratum Corneum. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2000, 114, 1184–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Ezure, T.; Amano, S. Adiponectin and Leptin Up-Regulate Extracellular Matrix Production by Dermal Fibroblasts. Biofactors 2007, 31, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Akazawa, Y.; Sayo, T.; Sugiyama, Y.; Sato, T.; Akimoto, N.; Ito, A.; Inoue, S. Adiponectin Resides in Mouse Skin and Upregulates Hyaluronan Synthesis in Dermal Fibroblasts. Connect. Tissue Res. 2011, 52, 322–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Yamane, T.; Kobayashi-Hattori, K.; Oishi, Y. Adiponectin Promotes Hyaluronan Synthesis along with Increases in Hyaluronan Synthase 2 Transcripts through an AMP-Activated Protein Kinase/Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-α-Dependent Pathway in Human Dermal Fibroblasts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 415, 235–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Stern, R.; Jedrzejas, M.J. Hyaluronidases: Their Genomics, Structures, and Mechanisms of Action. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 818–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Csoka, A.B.; Frost, G.I.; Stern, R. The Six Hyaluronidase-like Genes in the Human and Mouse Genomes. Matrix Biol. 2001, 20, 499–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Bravo, B.; Correia, P.; Gonçalves, J.E., Jr.; Sant’Anna, B.; Kerob, D. Benefits of Topical Hyaluronic Acid for Skin Quality and Signs of Skin Aging: From Literature Review to Clinical Evidence. Dermatol. Ther. 2022, 35, e15903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Longas, M.O.; Russell, C.S.; He, X.Y. Evidence for Structural Changes in Dermatan Sulfate and Hyaluronic Acid with Aging. Carbohydr. Res. 1987, 159, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Ghersetich, I.; Lotti, T.; Campanile, G.; Grappone, C.; Dini, G. Hyaluronic Acid in Cutaneous Intrinsic Aging. Int. J. Dermatol. 1994, 33, 119–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Holmes, M.W.A.; Bayliss, M.T.; Muir, H. Hyaluronic Acid in Human Articular Cartilage. Age-Related Changes in Content and Size. Biochem. J. 1988, 250, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Etscheid, M.; Beer, N.; Dodt, J. The Hyaluronan-Binding Protease Upregulates ERK1/2 and PI3K/Akt Signalling Pathways in Fibroblasts and Stimulates Cell Proliferation and Migration. Cell. Signal. 2005, 17, 1486–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Röck, K.; Tigges, J.; Sass, S.; Schütze, A.; Florea, A.M.; Fender, A.C.; Theis, F.J.; Krutmann, J.; Boege, F.; Fritsche, E.; et al. MiR-23a-3p Causes Cellular Senescence by Targeting Hyaluronan Synthase 2: Possible Implication for Skin Aging. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2015, 135, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Averbeck, M.; Gebhardt, C.A.; Voigt, S.; Beilharz, S.; Anderegg, U.; Termeer, C.C.; Sleeman, J.P.; Simon, J.C. Differential Regulation of Hyaluronan Metabolism in the Epidermal and Dermal Compartments of Human Skin by UVB Irradiation. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2007, 127, 687–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Dai, G.; Freudenberger, T.; Zipper, P.; Melchior, A.; Grether-Beck, S.; Rabausch, B.; De Groot, J.; Twarock, S.; Hanenberg, H.; Homey, B.; et al. Chronic Ultraviolet B Irradiation Causes Loss of Hyaluronic Acid from Mouse Dermis Because of Down-Regulation of Hyaluronic Acid Synthases. Am. J. Pathol. 2007, 171, 1451–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Kaufmann, J.; Möhle, K.; Hofmann, H.J.; Arnold, K. Molecular Dynamics Study of Hyaluronic Acid in Water. J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM 1998, 422, 109–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Ni, C.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Guo, X.; Lv, H. Hyaluronic Acid and HA-Modified Cationic Liposomes for Promoting Skin Penetration and Retention. J. Control Release 2023, 357, 432–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Bukhari, S.N.A.; Roswandi, N.L.; Waqas, M.; Habib, H.; Hussain, F.; Khan, S.; Sohail, M.; Ramli, N.A.; Thu, H.E.; Hussain, Z. Hyaluronic Acid, a Promising Skin Rejuvenating Biomedicine: A Review of Recent Updates and Pre-Clinical and Clinical Investigations on Cosmetic and Nutricosmetic Effects. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 120, 1682–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Al-Halaseh, L.K.; Al-Jawabri, N.A.; Tarawneh, S.K.; Al-Qdah, W.K.; Abu-Hajleh, M.N.; Al-Samydai, A.M.; Ahmed, M.A. A Review of the Cosmetic Use and Potentially Therapeutic Importance of Hyaluronic Acid. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 12, 034–041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Ilyin, S.O.; Kulichikhin, V.G.; Malkin, A.Y. The Rheological Characterisation of Typical Injection Implants Based on Hyaluronic Acid for Contour Correction. Rheol. Acta 2016, 55, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Falcone, S.J.; Palmeri, D.M.; Berg, R.A. Rheological and Cohesive Properties of Hyaluronic Acid. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2006, 76, 721–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Pavicic, T.; Gauglitz, G.G.; Lersch, P.; Schwach-Abdellaoui, K.; Malle, B.; Korting, H.C.; Farwick, M. Efficacy of Cream-Based Novel Formulations of Hyaluronic Acid of Different Molecular Weights in Anti-Wrinkle Treatment. J. Drugs. Dermatol. 2011, 10, 990–1000. [Google Scholar]
  149. Liatsopoulou, A.; Varvaresou, A.; Mellou, F.; Protopapa, E. Iontophoresis in Dermal Delivery: A Review of Applications in Dermato-Cosmetic and Aesthetic Sciences. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2023, 45, 117–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Inoue, S.; Oshima, Y.; Kogure, K. Non-Invasive Intradermal Delivery of Hyaluronic Acid via Iontophoresis. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2023, 46, 1635–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Theodoropoulou, K.; Rallis, E.; Kefala, V. New Developments in the Treatment of Aesthetic Problems with Electroporation. Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. Pharmacokinet. Int. Ed. 2024, 38, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Hashimoto, N.; Tatsuta, S.; Kitamura, H.; Katsuyama, M.; Uchida, K.; Sugibayashi, K. The Effect of Iontophoresis with and without Electroporation on the Penetration of High Molecular Compounds into the Stratum Corneum. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2022, 70, 454–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Essendoubi, M.; Gobinet, C.; Reynaud, R.; Angiboust, J.F.; Manfait, M.; Piot, O. Human Skin Penetration of Hyaluronic Acid of Different Molecular Weights as Probed by Raman Spectroscopy. Skin Res. Technol. 2016, 22, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Nam, G.; Lee, H.W.; Jang, J.S.; Kim, C.H.; Kim, K.H. Novel Conformation of Hyaluronic Acid with Improved Cosmetic Efficacy. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2023, 22, 1312–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Mazzucco, A. Hyaluronic Acid: Evaluation of Efficacy with Different Molecular Weights. Int. J. Chem. Res. 2018, 1, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Makino, E.T.; Huang, P.C.; Emmerich, T.; Jiang, L.I.; Mehta, R.C. Efficacy and Tolerability of Cosmetic Serums Enriched with Five Forms of Hyaluronic Acid as Part of Biweekly Diamond Tip Microdermabrasion Treatments for Facial Skin Dryness and Age-Associated Features. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 2023, 16, 1123–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Waggett, S.; Lyles, E.; Schlesinger, T. Update on Low-Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid in Dermatology: A Scoping Review. EMJ. Dermatol. 2024, 12, 134–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Farwick, M.P.L.; Strutz, G. Low Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid: Its Effects on Epidermal Gene Expression & Skin Ageing. SOFW J. 2008, 134, 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  159. Abe, Y.; Seino, S.; Kurihara, H.; Kage, M.; Tokudome, Y. 2-KDa Hyaluronan Ameliorates Human Facial Wrinkles through Increased Dermal Collagen Density Related to Promotion of Collagen Remodeling. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2023, 22, 320–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Kim, K.H.; Kim, K.T.; Kim, Y.H.; Kim, J.G.; Han, C.S.; Park, S.H.; Lee, B.Y. Preparation of Oligo Hyaluronic Acid by Hydrolysis and Its Application as a Cosmetic Ingredient. J. Soc. Cosmet. Sci. 2007, 33, 189–196. [Google Scholar]
  161. Akinbiyi, T.; Othman, S.; Familusi, O.; Calvert, C.; Card, E.B.; Percec, I. Better Results in Facial Rejuvenation with Fillers. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 2020, 8, e2763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Fundarò, S.P.; Salti, G.; Malgapo, D.M.H.; Innocenti, S. The Rheology and Physicochemical Characteristics of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: Their Clinical Implications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Guo, J.; Fang, W.; Wang, F. Injectable Fillers: Current Status, Physicochemical Properties, Function Mechanism, and Perspectives. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 23841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Buhren, B.A.; Schrumpf, H.; Bölke, E.; Kammers, K.; Gerber, P.A. Standardized in Vitro Analysis of the Degradability of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers by Hyaluronidase. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2018, 23, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Master, M.; Azizeddin, A.; Master, V. Hyaluronic Acid Filler Longevity in the Mid-Face: A Review of 33 Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 2024, 12, e5934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Colon, J.; Mirkin, S.; Hardigan, P.; Elias, M.J.; Jacobs, R.J. Adverse Events Reported From Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler Injections to the Facial Region: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2023, 15, e38286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Choi, S.Y.; Shin, S.H.; Seok, J.; Yoo, K.H.; Kim, B.J. Management Strategies for Vascular Complications in Hyaluronic Acid Filler Injections: A Case Series Analysis. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2023, 22, 3261–3267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Owczarczyk-Saczonek, A.; Zdanowska, N.; Wygonowska, E.; Placek, W. The Immunogenicity of Hyaluronic Fillers and Its Consequences. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 2021, 14, 921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Rodriguez-Marquez, C.D.; Arteaga-Marin, S.; Rivas-Sánchez, A.; Autrique-Hernández, R.; Castro-Muñoz, R. A Review on Current Strategies for Extraction and Purification of Hyaluronic Acid. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Huerta-Ángeles, G.; Nešporová, K.; Ambrožová, G.; Kubala, L.; Velebný, V. An Effective Translation: The Development of Hyaluronan-Based Medical Products From the Physicochemical, and Preclinical Aspects. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2018, 6, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Chung, K.L.; Convery, C.; Ejikeme, I.; Ghanem, A.M. A Systematic Review of the Literature of Delayed Inflammatory Reactions After Hyaluronic Acid Filler Injection to Estimate the Incidence of Delayed Type Hypersensitivity Reaction. Aesthet. Surg. J. 2020, 40, NP286–NP300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Gholamali, I.; Vu, T.T.; Jo, S.H.; Park, S.H.; Lim, K.T. Exploring the Progress of Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels: Synthesis, Characteristics, and Wide-Ranging Applications. Materials 2024, 17, 2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Luo, Z.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Wang, J.; Yu, Y. Modification and Crosslinking Strategies for Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogel Biomaterials. Smart Med. 2023, 2, e20230029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Daminato, E.; Bianchini, G.; Causin, V. New Directions in Aesthetic Medicine: A Novel and Hybrid Filler Based on Hyaluronic Acid and Lactose Modified Chitosan. Gels 2022, 8, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Zerbinati, N.; Sommatis, S.; Maccario, C.; Capillo, M.C.; Grimaldi, G.; Alonci, G.; Rauso, R.; Guida, S.; Mocchi, R. Comparative Physicochemical Analysis among 1,4-Butanediol Diglycidyl Ether Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers. Gels 2021, 7, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. De Boulle, K.; Glogau, R.; Kono, T.; Nathan, M.; Tezel, A.; Roca-Martinez, J.X.; Paliwal, S.; Stroumpoulis, D. A Review of the Metabolism of 1,4-Butanediol Diglycidyl Ether–Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers. Dermatol. Surg. 2013, 39, 1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Fidalgo, J.; Deglesne, P.A.; Arroyo, R.; Sepúlveda, L.; Ranneva, E.; Deprez, P. Detection of a New Reaction By-Product in BDDE Cross-Linked Autoclaved Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels by LC–MS Analysis. Med. Devices Evid. Res. 2018, 11, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Luo, Y.; Tan, J.; Zhou, Y.; Guo, Y.; Liao, X.; He, L.; Li, D.; Li, X.; Liu, Y. From Crosslinking Strategies to Biomedical Applications of Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogels: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 231, 123308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Younes, H.M.; Kadavil, H.; Ismail, H.M.; Adib, S.A.; Zamani, S.; Alany, R.G.; Al-Kinani, A.A. Overview of Tissue Engineering and Drug Delivery Applications of Reactive Electrospinning and Crosslinking Techniques of Polymeric Nanofibers with Highlights on Their Biocompatibility Testing and Regulatory Aspects. Pharmaceutics 2023, 16, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Khunmanee, S.; Jeong, Y.; Park, H. Crosslinking Method of Hyaluronic-Based Hydrogel for Biomedical Applications. J. Tissue Eng. 2017, 8, 2041731417726464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Yi, K.H.; Winayanuwattikun, W.; Kim, S.Y.; Wan, J.; Vachatimanont, V.; Putri, A.I.; Hidajat, I.J.; Yogya, Y.; Pamela, R. Skin Boosters: Definitions and Varied Classifications. Skin Res. Technol. 2024, 30, e13627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Kozłowiecka, M.; Malara, B. Application and Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Tissue Stimulators in the Prevention of Skin Aging. Aesthetic Cosmetol. Med. 2022, 11, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Roslyak, S. A Radical Way to Prevent Skin Aging and Treat It with the Help of Biogenic Stimulants. Am. J. Biomed. Sci. Res. 2023, 20, 499–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Haddad, S.; Galadari, H.; Patil, A.; Goldust, M.; Al Salam, S.; Guida, S. Evaluation of the Biostimulatory Effects and the Level of Neocollagenesis of Dermal Fillers: A Review. Int. J. Dermatol. 2022, 61, 1284–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Rho, N.K.; Han, K.H.; Cho, M.; Kim, H.S. A Survey on the Cosmetic Use of Injectable Polynucleotide: The Pattern of Practice among Korean Dermatologists. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2024, 23, 1243–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Kabakci, A.G.; Bozkır, D.M.; Cengizler, Ç.; Eren, D.S.; Bozkır, M.G. Assessing the Rejuvenation Effectiveness of a Hyaluronic Acid and Amino Acid Mixture in the Periorbital Region. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 2023, 16, 973–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Oh, S.; Seo, S.B.; Kim, G.; Batsukh, S.; Son, K.H.; Byun, K. Poly-D,L-Lactic Acid Stimulates Angiogenesis and Collagen Synthesis in Aged Animal Skin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Zerbinati, N.; Lotti, T.; Monticelli, D.; Rauso, R.; González-Isaza, P.; D’este, E.; Calligaro, A.; Sommatis, S.; Maccario, C.; Mocchi, R.; et al. In Vitro Evaluation of the Biosafety of Hyaluronic Acid PEG Cross-Linked with Micromolecules of Calcium Hydroxyapatite in Low Concentration. Open Access Maced J. Med. Sci. 2018, 6, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Kubik, P.; Gallo, D.; Tanda, M.L.; Jankau, J.; Rauso, R.; Gruszczyński, W.; Pawłowska, A.; Chrapczyński, P.; Malinowski, M.; Grzanka, D.; et al. Evaluation of the Safety of Neauvia Stimulate Injectable Product in Patients with Autoimmune Thyroid Diseases Based on Histopathological Examinations and Retrospective Analysis of Medical Records. Gels 2023, 9, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Guida, S.; Galadari, H.; Vespasiani, G.; Pellacani, G. Skin Biostimulation and Hyaluronic Acid: Current Knowledge and New Evidence. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2024, 23, 701–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Kang, H.; Zuo, Z.; Lin, R.; Yao, M.; Han, Y.; Han, J. The Most Promising Microneedle Device: Present and Future of Hyaluronic Acid Microneedle Patch. Drug Deliv. 2022, 29, 3087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Aldawood, F.K.; Andar, A.; Desai, S. A Comprehensive Review of Microneedles: Types, Materials, Processes, Characterizations and Applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 2815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Chudzińska, J.; Wawrzyńczak, A.; Feliczak-Guzik, A. Microneedles Based on a Biodegradable Polymer—Hyaluronic Acid. Polymers 2024, 16, 1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Nazary Abrbekoh, F.; Salimi, L.; Saghati, S.; Amini, H.; Fathi Karkan, S.; Moharamzadeh, K.; Sokullu, E.; Rahbarghazi, R. Application of Microneedle Patches for Drug Delivery; Doorstep to Novel Therapies. J. Tissue Eng. 2022, 13, 20417314221085390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Alimardani, V.; Abolmaali, S.S.; Yousefi, G.; Rahiminezhad, Z.; Abedi, M.; Tamaddon, A.; Ahadian, S. Microneedle Arrays Combined with Nanomedicine Approaches for Transdermal Delivery of Therapeutics. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Saha, I.; Rai, V.K. Hyaluronic Acid Based Microneedle Array: Recent Applications in Drug Delivery and Cosmetology. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 267, 118168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Lu, Q.; Tang, X.; Tao, B.; Huang, K.; Li, K.; Liu, C.; Gao, B.; Xu, M.; Geng, W.; Li, K.; et al. Multifunctional Hyaluronic Acid Microneedle Patch Enhances Diabetic Wound Healing in Diabetic Infections. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 296, 139685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Malik, S.; Muhammad, K.; Waheed, Y. Nanotechnology: A Revolution in Modern Industry. Molecules 2023, 28, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Kim, K.; Choi, H.; Choi, E.S.; Park, M.H.; Ryu, J.H. Hyaluronic Acid-Coated Nanomedicine for Targeted Cancer Therapy. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Karakocak, B.B.; Liang, J.; Biswas, P.; Ravi, N. Hyaluronate Coating Enhances the Delivery and Biocompatibility of Gold Nanoparticles. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 186, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Liu, P.; Chen, G.; Zhang, J. A Review of Liposomes as a Drug Delivery System: Current Status of Approved Products, Regulatory Environments, and Future Perspectives. Molecules 2022, 27, 1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Nsairat, H.; Khater, D.; Sayed, U.; Odeh, F.; Al Bawab, A.; Alshaer, W. Liposomes: Structure, Composition, Types, and Clinical Applications. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Giordani, S.; Marassi, V.; Zattoni, A.; Roda, B.; Reschiglian, P. Liposomes Characterization for Market Approval as Pharmaceutical Products: Analytical Methods, Guidelines and Standardized Protocols. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2023, 236, 115751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Martel-Estrada, S.A.; Morales-Cardona, A.I.; Vargas-Requena, C.L.; Rubio-Lara, J.A.; Martínez-Pérez, C.A.; Jimenez-Vega, F. Delivery Systems in Nanocosmeceuticals. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2022, 61, 901–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Cardoza, C.; Nagtode, V.; Pratap, A.; Mali, S.N. Emerging Applications of Nanotechnology in Cosmeceutical Health Science: Latest Updates. Health Sci. Rev. 2022, 4, 100051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Mansoori, B.; Mohammadi, A.; Abedi-Gaballu, F.; Abbaspour, S.; Ghasabi, M.; Yekta, R.; Shirjang, S.; Dehghan, G.; Hamblin, M.R.; Baradaran, B. Hyaluronic Acid-Decorated Liposomal Nanoparticles for Targeted Delivery of 5-Fluorouracil into HT-29 Colorectal Cancer Cells. J. Cell Physiol. 2020, 235, 6817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Chauhan, N.; Vasava, P.; Khan, S.L.; Siddiqui, F.A.; Islam, F.; Chopra, H.; Emran, T. Bin Ethosomes: A Novel Drug Carrier. Ann. Med. Surg. 2022, 82, 104595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Wu, J.; Xu, R.; Xu, X.; Ye, S.; Huang, A. Preparation and Evaluation of Transdermal Permeation of Huperzine A Ethosomes Gel in Vitro. BMC Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2024, 25, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Musielak, E.; Krajka-Kuźniak, V. Liposomes and Ethosomes: Comparative Potential in Enhancing Skin Permeability for Therapeutic and Cosmetic Applications. Cosmetics 2024, 11, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Akombaetwa, N.; Ilangala, A.B.; Thom, L.; Memvanga, P.B.; Witika, B.A.; Buya, A.B. Current Advances in Lipid Nanosystems Intended for Topical and Transdermal Drug Delivery Applications. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Sharma, T.; Thakur, S.; Kaur, M.; Singh, A.; Jain, S.K. Novel Hyaluronic Acid Ethosomes Based Gel Formulation for Topical Use with Reduced Toxicity, Better Skin Permeation, Deposition, and Improved Pharmacodynamics. J. Liposome Res. 2023, 33, 129–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Xie, J.; Ji, Y.; Xue, W.; Ma, D.; Hu, Y. Hyaluronic Acid-Containing Ethosomes as a Potential Carrier for Transdermal Drug Delivery. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2018, 172, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Mawazi, S.M.; Ge, Y.; Widodo, R.T. Niosome Preparation Techniques and Structure—An Illustrated Review. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Ge, X.; Wei, M.; He, S.; Yuan, W.E. Advances of Non-Ionic Surfactant Vesicles (Niosomes) and Their Application in Drug Delivery. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Hanieh, P.N.; Forte, J.; Di Meo, C.; Ammendolia, M.G.; Del Favero, E.; Cantù, L.; Rinaldi, F.; Marianecci, C.; Carafa, M. Hyaluronic Acid Derivative Effect on Niosomal Coating and Interaction with Cellular Mimetic Membranes. Molecules 2021, 26, 3434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Kotta, S.; Aldawsari, H.M.; Badr-Eldin, S.M.; Nair, A.B.; YT, K. Progress in Polymeric Micelles for Drug Delivery Applications. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Ren, J.; Cao, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, X.; Lu, H.; Yang, J.; Wang, S. Self-Assembled Polymeric Micelle as a Novel MRNA Delivery Carrier. J. Control. Release 2021, 338, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Šmejkalová, D.; Muthný, T.; Nešporová, K.; Hermannová, M.; Achbergerová, E.; Huerta-Angeles, G.; Svoboda, M.; Čepa, M.; Machalová, V.; Luptáková, D.; et al. Hyaluronan Polymeric Micelles for Topical Drug Delivery. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 156, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Mishra, V.; Bansal, K.K.; Verma, A.; Yadav, N.; Thakur, S.; Sudhakar, K.; Rosenholm, J.M. Solid Lipid Nanoparticles: Emerging Colloidal Nano Drug Delivery Systems. Pharmaceutics 2018, 10, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Siram, K.; Karuppaiah, A.; Gautam, M.; Sankar, V. Fabrication of Hyaluronic Acid Surface Modified Solid Lipid Nanoparticles Loaded with Imatinib Mesylate for Targeting Human Breast Cancer MCF-7 Cells. J. Clust. Sci. 2023, 34, 921–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Yue, Y.; Zhao, D.; Yin, Q. Hyaluronic Acid Modified Nanostructured Lipid Carriers for Transdermal Bupivacaine Delivery: In Vitro and in Vivo Anesthesia Evaluation. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 98, 813–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Nor Bainun, I.; Alias, N.H.; Syed-Hassan, S.S.A. Nanoemulsion: Formation, Characterization, Properties and Applications—A Review. Adv. Mat. Res. 2015, 1113, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Preeti; Sambhakar, S.; Malik, R.; Bhatia, S.; Al Harrasi, A.; Rani, C.; Saharan, R.; Kumar, S.; Geeta; Sehrawat, R. Nanoemulsion: An Emerging Novel Technology for Improving the Bioavailability of Drugs. Scientifica 2023, 2023, 6640103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Iskandar, B.; Liu, T.W.; Mei, H.C.; Kuo, I.C.; Surboyo, M.D.C.; Lin, H.M.; Lee, C.K. Herbal Nanoemulsions in Cosmetic Science: A Comprehensive Review of Design, Preparation, Formulation, and Characterization. J. Food. Drug. Anal. 2024, 32, 428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Kong, M.; Chen, X.G.; Kweon, D.K.; Park, H.J. Investigations on Skin Permeation of Hyaluronic Acid Based Nanoemulsion as Transdermal Carrier. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 86, 837–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Dini, I.; Laneri, S. Nutricosmetics: A Brief Overview. Phytother. Res. 2019, 33, 3054–3063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Szyszkowska, B.; Łepecka-Klusek, C.; Kozłowicz, K.; Jazienicka, I.; Krasowska, D. The Influence of Selected Ingredients of Dietary Supplements on Skin Condition. Adv. Dermatol. Allergol. 2014, 31, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Smith, S.A.; Travers, R.J.; Morrissey, J.H. How It All Starts: Initiation of the Clotting Cascade. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2015, 50, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Palta, S.; Saroa, R.; Palta, A. Overview of the Coagulation System. Indian J. Anaesth. 2014, 58, 515–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Norris, L.A. Blood Coagulation. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2003, 17, 369–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Park, S.; Park, J.K. Back to Basics: The Coagulation Pathway. Blood Res. 2024, 59, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Cesarman-Maus, G.; Hajjar, K.A. Molecular Mechanisms of Fibrinolysis. Br. J. Haematol. 2005, 129, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Landén, N.X.; Li, D.; Ståhle, M. Transition from Inflammation to Proliferation: A Critical Step during Wound Healing. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2016, 73, 3861–3885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Yang, H.; Song, L.; Zou, Y.; Sun, D.; Wang, L.; Yu, Z.; Guo, J. Role of Hyaluronic Acids and Potential as Regenerative Biomaterials in Wound Healing. ACS Appl. Bio. Mater. 2021, 4, 311–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Kaul, A.; Short, W.D.; Keswani, S.G.; Wang, X. Immunologic Roles of Hyaluronan in Dermal Wound Healing. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Milner, C.M.; Higman, V.A.; Day, A.J. TSG-6: A Pluripotent Inflammatory Mediator? Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2006, 34, 446–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Shang, L.; Li, M.; Xu, A.; Zhuo, F. Recent Applications and Molecular Mechanisms of Hyaluronic Acid in Skin Aging and Wound Healing. Med. Novel Technol. Devices 2024, 23, 100320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Darby, I.A.; Zakuan, N.; Billet, F.; Desmoulière, A. The Myofibroblast, a Key Cell in Normal and Pathological Tissue Repair. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2016, 73, 1145–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Alven, S.; Aderibigbe, B.A. Hyaluronic Acid-Based Scaffolds as Potential Bioactive Wound Dressings. Polymers 2021, 13, 2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Yang, X.; Wang, B.; Peng, D.; Nie, X.; Wang, J.; Yu, C.Y.; Wei, H. Hyaluronic Acid-Based Injectable Hydrogels for Wound Dressing and Localized Tumor Therapy: A Review. Adv. Nanobiomed. Res. 2022, 2, 2200124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Blunck, D.; Schöffski, O. Hyaluronic Acid Treatment versus Standard of Care in Chronic Wounds in a German Setting: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Health Sci. Rep. 2023, 6, e969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Ferreira, R.G.; Azzoni, A.R.; Santana, M.H.A.; Petrides, D. Techno-Economic Analysis of a Hyaluronic Acid Production Process Utilizing Streptococcal Fermentation. Processes 2021, 9, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Xu, X.; Jha, A.K.; Harrington, D.A.; Farach-Carson, M.C.; Jia, X. Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogels: From a Natural Polysaccharide to Complex Networks. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 3280–3294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Zhang, M.; Dong, Q.; Yang, K.; Chen, R.; Zhang, J.; Xiao, P.; Zhou, Y. Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels with Excellent Self-Healing Capacity and Photo-Enhanced Mechanical Properties for Wound Healing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 267, 131235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Antoszewska, M.; Sokolewicz, E.M.; Barańska-Rybak, W. Wide Use of Hyaluronic Acid in the Process of Wound Healing—A Rapid Review. Sci. Pharm. 2024, 92, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. King, I.C.C.; Sorooshian, P. Hyaluronan in Skin Wound Healing: Therapeutic Applications. J. Wound Care 2020, 29, 782–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Gong, J.P. Why are double network hydrogels so tough? Soft Matter 2010, 6, 2583–2590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Mortier, C.; Costa, D.C.S.; Oliveira, M.B.; Haugen, H.J.; Lyngstadaas, S.P.; Blaker, J.J.; Mano, J.F. Advanced Hydrogels Based on Natural Macromolecules: Chemical Routes to Achieve Mechanical Versatility. Mater. Today Chem. 2022, 26, 101222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Mashabela, L.T.; Maboa, M.M.; Miya, N.F.; Ajayi, T.O.; Chasara, R.S.; Milne, M.; Mokhele, S.; Demana, P.H.; Witika, B.A.; Siwe-Noundou, X.; et al. A Comprehensive Review of Cross-Linked Gels as Vehicles for Drug Delivery to Treat Central Nervous System Disorders. Gels 2022, 8, 563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Lewandowska, K. Miscibility Studies of Hyaluronic Acid and Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Blends in Various Solvents. Materials 2020, 13, 4750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Gwak, M.A.; Hong, B.M.; Seok, J.M.; Park, S.A.; Park, W.H. Effect of Tannic Acid on the Mechanical and Adhesive Properties of Catechol-Modified Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 191, 699–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Zinkovska, N.; Pekar, M.; Smilek, J. Gradient Hydrogels—Overview of Techniques Demonstrating the Existence of a Gradient. Polymers 2022, 14, 866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  253. Zeng, M.; Huang, Z.; Cen, X.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, F.; Miao, J.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, R. Biomimetic Gradient Hydrogels with High Toughness and Antibacterial Properties. Gels 2024, 10, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Bustamante-Torres, M.; Romero-Fierro, D.; Arcentales-Vera, B.; Palomino, K.; Magaña, H.; Bucio, E. Hydrogels Classification According to the Physical or Chemical Interactions and as Stimuli-Sensitive Materials. Gels 2021, 7, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Trombino, S.; Servidio, C.; Curcio, F.; Cassano, R. Strategies for Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogel Design in Drug Delivery. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Graça, M.F.P.; Miguel, S.P.; Cabral, C.S.D.; Correia, I.J. Hyaluronic Acid—Based Wound Dressings: A Review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 241, 116364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Anisha, B.S.; Biswas, R.; Chennazhi, K.P.; Jayakumar, R. Chitosan–Hyaluronic Acid/Nano Silver Composite Sponges for Drug Resistant Bacteria Infected Diabetic Wounds. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 62, 310–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Amirlak, B.; Mahedia, M.; Shah, N. A Clinical Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Hyaluronan Sponge with Vitamin C Versus Placebo for Scar Reduction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 2016, 4, e792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Mahedia, M.; Shah, N.; Amirlak, B. Clinical Evaluation of Hyaluronic Acid Sponge with Zinc versus Placebo for Scar Reduction after Breast Surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 2016, 4, e791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Catanzano, O.; D’Esposito, V.; Formisano, P.; Boateng, J.S.; Quaglia, F. Composite Alginate-Hyaluronan Sponges for the Delivery of Tranexamic Acid in Postextractive Alveolar Wounds. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 107, 654–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Tamahkar, E.; Özkahraman, B.; Özbaş, Z.; İzbudak, B.; Yarimcan, F.; Boran, F.; Öztürk, A.B. Aloe Vera-Based Antibacterial Porous Sponges for Wound Dressing Applications. J. Porous Mater. 2021, 28, 741–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Bock, A.; Peters, F.; Heitzer, M.; Winnand, P.; Kniha, K.; Katz, M.S.; Hölzle, F.; Modabber, A. Assessing the Influence of Hyaluronan Dressing on Wound Healing on Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites Using a Three-Dimensional Scanner. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 6433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  263. Roehrs, H.; Stocco, J.G.D.; Pott, F.; Blanc, G.; Meier, M.J.; Dias, F.A.L. Dressings and Topical Agents Containing Hyaluronic Acid for Chronic Wound Healing. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2023, 2023, CD012215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Kim, D.S.; Seong, K.Y.; Lee, H.; Kim, M.J.; An, S.M.; Jeong, J.S.; Kim, S.Y.; Kang, H.G.; Jang, S.; Hwang, D.Y.; et al. Antiadhesive Hyaluronic Acid-Based Wound Dressings Promote Wound Healing by Preventing Re-Injury: An In Vivo Investigation. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  265. Turner, N.; Kielty, C.; Walker, M.; Canfield, A.E. A Novel Hyaluronan-Based Biomaterial (Hyaff-11®) as a Scaffold for Endothelial Cells in Tissue Engineered Vascular Grafts. Biomaterials 2004, 25, 5955–5964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Song, M.A.; Fawzy, M.A. Exploring Hyaluronic Acid as a Potential Standard Dressing for Burn Wound. Int. J. Med. Sci. Clin. Res. Stud. 2022, 02, 787–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Longinotti, C. The Use of Hyaluronic Acid Based Dressings to Treat Burns: A Review. Burn. Trauma 2014, 2, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Uccioli, L.; Giurato, L.; Ruotolo, V.; Ciavarella, A.; Grimaldi, M.S.; Piaggesi, A.; Teobaldi, I.; Ricci, L.; Scionti, L.; Vermigli, C.; et al. Two-Step Autologous Grafting Using HYAFF Scaffolds in Treating Difficult Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Results of a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial with Long-Term Follow-Up. Int. J. Lower Extrem. Wounds 2011, 10, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Myers, S.R.; Partha, V.N.; Soranzo, C.; Price, R.D.; Navsaria, H.A. Hyalomatrix: A Temporary Epidermal Barrier, Hyaluronan Delivery, and Neodermis Induction System for Keratinocyte Stem Cell Therapy. Tissue Eng. 2007, 13, 2733–2741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Erbatur, S.; Coban, Y.; Aydın, E.N. Comparision of Clinical and Histopathological Results of Hyalomatrix Usage in Adult Patients. Int. J. Burn. Trauma 2012, 2, 118–125. [Google Scholar]
  271. Paghetti, A.; Bellingeri, A.; Pomponio, G.; Sansoni, J.; Paladino, D. Topic Efficacy of Ialuronic Acid Associated with Argentic Sulphadiazine (Connettivina Plus) in the Treatment of Pressure Sores: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study. Prof. Inferm. 2009, 62, 67–77. [Google Scholar]
  272. Russo, R.; Carrizzo, A.; Barbato, A.; Rasile, B.R.; Pentangelo, P.; Ceccaroni, A.; Marra, C.; Alfano, C.; Losco, L. Clinical Evaluation of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Rigenase® and Polyhexanide (Fitostimoline® Plus) vs. Hyaluronic Acid and Silver Sulfadiazine (Connettivina® Bio Plus) for the Treatment of Acute Skin Wounds: A Randomized Trial. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 2518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The use of hyaluronic acid (HA) in aging prevention and wound healing.
Figure 1. The use of hyaluronic acid (HA) in aging prevention and wound healing.
Gels 11 00281 g001
Figure 2. The role of hyaluronic-acid-based hydrogel in wound healing.
Figure 2. The role of hyaluronic-acid-based hydrogel in wound healing.
Gels 11 00281 g002
Table 1. Molecular weight-dependent biological activity of hyaluronic acid (HA).
Table 1. Molecular weight-dependent biological activity of hyaluronic acid (HA).
Type of HAMolecular Weight (kDa)Biological PropertiesReferences
High molecular weight≥1000 kDaAnti-inflammatory[37,49,55]
Anti-angiogenic
Immunosuppressive
Medium molecular weight250–1000 kDaProangiogenic [51,58,59]
Proinflammatory
Anti-apoptotic
Low molecular weight10–250 kDaProangiogenic[5,51,60]
Proinflammatory
Immunostimulatory
HA oligomers<10 kDaProangiogenic[5,55,58]
Proinflammatory
Highly immunostimulatory
Cell proliferation stimulatory
Table 2. Examples of cosmetics with hyaluronic acid depending on the size of the molecule.
Table 2. Examples of cosmetics with hyaluronic acid depending on the size of the molecule.
TypeskDaPlace
of Action
Mechanism
of Action
Skin Care Products
CreamsSerumsMasksTonics
High
Molecular Weight
>1000 kDaStratum corneum• Increases the viscosity of cosmetic products

• Remains on the surface of skin

• Serves a barrier function

• Improves the hydration of the upper layers of the epidermis [134,143,148,154,155,156]
• Indeed Labs™ Hydraluron
Moisture Jelly

• Lierac
Hydragenist
The Rehydrating Radiance Cream

• Sesderma
Hidraderm
Hyal
Face Cream

• By Terry
Hyaluronic
Global Face Cream

• Skin&Lab
Hybarrier
Hyaluronic Cream

• BERGAMO
Hyaluronic Acid Essential Intensive Cream

• L’Erbolario
Triple Action Face Cream
• Unlëss
Cosmetics
Antioxidant Glow
OxiShield Serum

• Dermalure
Hyaluronic Serum

• L’Oreal Paris Revitalift Filler 1.5% Pure Hyaluronic Acid Serum

• Mesoestetic®
HA Densimatrix Serum
• WIS+
Hyaluronic Acid Face Mask

• L’Oréal Paris Hyaluron Specialist Tissue Mask

• L’Erbolario
Triple Action Face Mask

• Germaine de Capuccini
Timexpert Hydraluronic
Hydra Nourishing Mask

• The Organic Pharmacy
Hyaluronic Acid Corrective Mask
• Purlés 160
Hydra Spray Toner

• CLARENA® Hyaluron 3D
Tonic

• Incarose
Hyaluronic Tonic

• Isntree®
Hyaluronic Acid
Toner Plus

• BERGAMO
Hyaluronic Acid Intensive Toner
Medium Molecular Weight250–1000 kDaEpidermis• Hydrates the epidermis

• Improves wound healing
[14,134,143,148]
• By Terry
Hyaluronic Global Face Cream

• Institut
Esthederm
Intensive
Hyaluronic Cream

• BERGAMO
Hyaluronic Acid
Essential
Intensive Cream

• L’Erbolario
Triple Action Face Cream
• Mesoestetic® HA Densimatrix Serum

• Kokie
Professional
Hyaluronic Acid 2%
Middle
Molecular Weight Serum
• L’Erbolario
Triple Action Face Mask

• Germaine de Capuccini
Timexpert Hydraluronic Hydra Nourishing Mask

• Jalupro® Masks

• The Organic Pharmacy
Hyaluronic Acid Corrective Mask
• Incarose
Hyaluronic Tonic

• Isntree®
Hyaluronic Acid Toner Plus

• BERGAMO
Hyaluronic
Acid
Intensive
Toner
Low
Molecular Weight
10–250 kDaDermis• Improves skin hydration

• Reduces
wrinkles [5,134,143,148,157,158,159]
• By Terry
Hyaluronic Global Face Cream

• Sesderma
Hidraderm Hyal Face Cream

• Torriden DIVE-IN
Low Molecule Hyaluronic Acid Cream

• BERGAMO
Hyaluronic Acid Essential Intensive Cream

• L’Erbolario
Triple Action Face Cream
• Nano Recipe
Low Hyaluronic
Molecular
Acid 1% Serum

• Cos De BAHA LMW HA
Teca Serum

• L’Oreal Paris
Revitalift Filler 1.5% Pure Hyaluronic Acid Serum

• Torriden DIVE-IN Hyaluronic Acid Serum

• Mesoestetic®
HA Densimatrix Serum
• WIS+
Hyaluronic Acid Face
Mask

• L’Oréal Paris Hyaluron
• Specialist Tissue Mask

• Germaine de Capuccini
Timexpert Hydraluronic
Hydra Nourishing Mask

• The Organic Pharmacy
Hyaluronic Acid Corrective Mask
• L’Erbolario
Triple Action Face Mask
• CLARENA® Hyaluron 3D
Tonic

• Torriden DIVE-IN
Low Molecule Hyaluronic Acid Toner

• Oliwia Plum
Dash Tonic

• Lantale
Hyaluronic Acid Face Toner

• Incarose
Hyaluronic Tonic

• Isntree®
Hyaluronic Acid
Toner Plus
Ultra-Low Molecular Weight<10
kDa
Dermis• Penetrates the deeper layers
of the skin

• Improves
skin hydration [148,160]
• Dulàc
Anti Wrinkle Face Cream
• Isntree®
Ultra-low Molecular Hyaluronic Acid Serum

• The Lab By Blanc Doux®
Oligo Hyaluronic Acid Hydro Serum
• Wellage
Real Hyaluronic Blue Ampoule Face Mask
• Isntree®
Ultra-Low
Molecular
Hyaluronic Acid Toner
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chylińska, N.; Maciejczyk, M. Hyaluronic Acid and Skin: Its Role in Aging and Wound-Healing Processes. Gels 2025, 11, 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11040281

AMA Style

Chylińska N, Maciejczyk M. Hyaluronic Acid and Skin: Its Role in Aging and Wound-Healing Processes. Gels. 2025; 11(4):281. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11040281

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chylińska, Natalia, and Mateusz Maciejczyk. 2025. "Hyaluronic Acid and Skin: Its Role in Aging and Wound-Healing Processes" Gels 11, no. 4: 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11040281

APA Style

Chylińska, N., & Maciejczyk, M. (2025). Hyaluronic Acid and Skin: Its Role in Aging and Wound-Healing Processes. Gels, 11(4), 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11040281

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop