Next Article in Journal
Research Progress of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Improving Plant Resistance to Temperature Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Hyperspectral Spatial Frequency Domain Imaging Technique for Soluble Solids Content and Firmness Assessment of Pears
Previous Article in Special Issue
Long-Term Evolution of the Climatic Factors and Its Influence on Grape Quality in Northeastern Romania
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Structure and Trends in Climate Parameters of Wine-Growing Regions in Slovenia

Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Maribor, Pivola 10, 2331 Hoče, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2024, 10(8), 854; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10080854
Submission received: 15 July 2024 / Revised: 9 August 2024 / Accepted: 10 August 2024 / Published: 13 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Orchard Management under Climate Change)

Abstract

:
This study examined the structure and trends of climate parameters important for grape production from 1952 to 2022 in the wine-growing regions of Podravje, Posavje, and Primorska in Slovenia. Average and extreme temperature and precipitation data from six meteorological stations in three wine-growing regions were divided into annual and growing seasons. The results show that in the period 1991–2022, there was a warming in the growing season in all regions by 1.4–1.7 °C, except the southern part of Primorska (Koper station) 0.6 °C, compared to the reference period 1961–1990. The heat accumulation indices (GDDs and HI) increased significantly, which is mainly due to the increase in the maximum temperature in the growing season temperature (GST max) and the number of days with Tmax > 30 °C (NDT30). The NDT30 increased the most, by a factor of more than four. In the reference period (1961–1990), however, the trend in the number of hot days was even slightly negative. The mean seasonal temperature rose to around 17 °C in regions with a continental climate and to around 19 °C in the Mediterranean region, which could be reflected in the earlier ripening of the grapes. The trends show a decrease in total annual precipitation (AP) after 1991, but this was significant only at one inland location (Maribor), while the total precipitation during the growing season (GSP) decreased significantly at three locations (Maribor, Bilje, and Koper).

1. Introduction

Climate is one of the most important limiting factors for agriculture production. Climate change is also challenging viticultural production everywhere, especially in regions with warm and dry climates. Frost and drought risk during the growing period are common problems in viticulture. Therefore, maintaining viticulture also requires adaptation to climate change, and the assessment of adaptation strategies needs to be more precise and multidisciplinary, tailored to local conditions [1].
For Western and Northern Europe, a temperature increase of 2.5 to 4.5 °C is predicted by the end of the 21st century and most climate models predict an increase in winter precipitation [2]. In recent years, warming trends have been observed in all seasons [3]. In the northern hemisphere, the warming will be stronger in the colder half of the year. It is expected that viticulture in many regions with cool climates will benefit from the higher temperatures in the growing season. Milder winters and warmer summers are expected, and extreme high temperatures will occur more frequently. The risk of low winter temperatures and unfavorable conditions during the flowering period is expected to be lower, while the risk of late frosts in spring will increase due to early budbreak [4,5,6].
Many researchers have studied the impact of climate change on the viability of viticulture production, examining changes in overwintering tolerance potential, frost incidence, growing season length, and heat and drought stress during the growing season [7,8,9,10,11]. The need to adapt to climate change is even greater for grapevines than for other crops, as the composition of berries, which is a key factor in fruit and wine quality, typicality, and market value, depends strongly on “terroir” (the particularities of the culture area) [12]. Spatial modeling research has shown that wine-growing regions will expand as parts of southern Europe become too hot to produce high-quality wines, and northern regions will acquire vineyard potential, as in the Middle Ages, from the 9th to the 13th century AD [13,14]. However, despite these short-term benefits, the predicted rise in global temperatures over the next half century could require major changes in the wine industry. Slight changes in temperatures during the growing season could lead to shifts in varietal suitability in many regions [15] or require costly adaptation measures both in the vineyard and in the winery.
Unfavorable weather conditions could lead to varietal changes in some wine-growing regions. Due to climate change, the growing season has been extended, which also enables longer favorable conditions for the development of the two most persistent diseases (downy and powdery mildew). In Slovenia, there is usually greater pressure from downy mildew in the continental part (Podravje and Posavje) and powdery mildew in the Mediterranean (Primorska). The earlier appearance of downy mildew in the continental part may be a direct result of more favorable temperature conditions in May and June. In the worst-case climate scenario, two more fungicide sprays will be needed compared to the current management regimes, as reported by Salinari et al. in 2006 [16]. Therefore, from this point of view, sustainable varieties (PiWi, tolerant to downy and powdery mildew) are more adaptable to these conditions than traditional ones [17]. Adaptations to higher temperatures include also changes in plant material (e.g., rootstocks, varieties, and clones) and viticultural techniques (e.g., changes in trunk height, leaf area to fruit weight ratio, and timing of pruning) so that harvest dates fall within the optimal period of late September or early October in the northern hemisphere [18].
In some regions, projections show that an increase in precipitation can in turn affect soil development by increasing the amount of water flowing through the soil [18]. Climate change would therefore have a significant impact on soil development as it would lead to the loss of very fine particles of organic matter. The tendency towards more extreme weather events (more intense rainfall), as a consequence of climate change, can increase soil erosion, especially in vineyards on steep slopes [19,20,21,22].
The climatic factors are summarized in a series of climatic indices, of which the average temperature in the growing season (GSTavg), the Huglin Index (HI), and the growing degree days (GDDs) or Winkler Index are the most used [15]. The minimum heat requirement for the growth of vines is expressed as a value of the heat sum index, i.e., as growing degree days (GDDs) from April to October in the northern hemisphere, at a base temperature of 10 °C [15]. Becker [23] established a minimum GDDs of 1000 °C units, but later studies found a minimum value of 850 °C units [24,25]. After 1990, the developmental stages of the grapevine, such as budbreak, flowering, and ripening, occurred earlier on average than in the 1980s [26,27,28,29].
Slovenia is a very small wine-growing region in Central Europe with different climates (Mediterranean, Continental, and Pannonian climates). Despite the fact that Slovenia is not a globally important wine-growing country, most of the globally important grape varieties for quality wines are grown there. The aim of this research was to investigate the changes in temperature and precipitation as well as some bioclimatic indices based on which adaptation strategies to climate change can be recommended in the future, even for neighboring wine-growing regions with a similar climate.

2. Data and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Climate Data

For this study, the longest available data series from 6 meteorological stations (Maribor, Murska Sobota, Novo Mesto, Črnomelj, Bilje, and Koper) in three wine-growing regions (Podravje, Posavje, and Primorska) in Slovenia were used (Figure 1). The Podravje wine-growing region lies between the river Sava (SW) and the Hungarian border (NE). Geologically, the area is part of the former basin of the Pannonian Sea, which consists of folded and poorly interlocked marine sediments from the Neogene and has a Pannonian continental transitional climate [30]. The continental climate characteristics increase with increasing distance from the Alps. The vineyards (6000 ha) are predominantly planted with white grape varieties and are located on steep slopes with a gradient of 15–50% and at altitudes of 250 to 350 m [31]. The climate in the Posavje wine-growing region (SE) is also continental, with large seasonal temperature differences, cold winters, and moderately warm summers. The vineyards (3000 ha) are planted 50% with white and 50% with red grape varieties. In both wine-growing regions, half of the vineyards are on steep slopes with a gradient of 15 to 30%, and a quarter of the area has a gradient of more than 30% [31]. The Primorska (SW) wine-growing region lies along the Italian border, from the Adriatic to the Alps, and the general climate is sub-Mediterranean [30], characterized by an average annual minimum temperature of over 0 °C and a temperature in the warmest month of over 20 °C. Half of the vineyards are located on slopes with a gradient of up to 15%. The long-term average (1952–2022) of precipitation during the growing season (1 April–31 October) varies between 612 mm (Koper) and 870 mm (Bilje), and precipitation is very unevenly distributed throughout the year. The vineyards (6500 ha) are planted with 60% white and 40% red grape varieties [31].
The daily precipitation and temperature values (mean, maximum, and minimum) from six meteorological stations (1952–2022) were used for the analysis. The data were taken from the archives of the Slovenian Environment Agency (ARSO) [32]. All stations had sufficient records for a long-term analysis. The data provide a good reference for the general structure and trends of temperature and precipitation.

2.2. Climate Parameters and Bioclimatic Indices

An analysis of the observed climate was carried out for the periods 1952–2022, 1961–1990 (reference period for the 20th century with a minor change in climate parameters), and 1991–2022. The data from the individual stations were categorized according to growing seasons or important grapevine growing seasons and used to derive bioclimatic indices and extreme climate indices that are important for wine grape production (Table 1). For the growing season (April–October), precipitation and temperature (average, minimum, and maximum) of each station were summarized, as the averages of the growing season usually correlate significantly with wine varieties and type of wine production [15]. To assess the signs of heat stress, the number of days with temperatures above 30 °C was determined [9]. This temperature leads to premature ripening of the grapes (shorter growing season), lower total acidity, and lower aroma compounds [33].
To obtain more information about the wine region and to determine general guidelines for the potential quality and style of the wine, the GDDs [34] and the Huglin Index (HI) [35] were calculated. These two bioclimatic indices make it possible to classify wine-growing regions according to the sum of the temperatures required for the development of the vines and the ripening of the grapes [36].
For the northern hemisphere, the Huglin Index [35] is calculated using the following formula:
H I = 01.04 30.09 d T a v g 10 + T m a x 10 2 ,
where Tavg is the daily mean air temperature (°C), Tmax is the daily maximum air temperature (°C), and d is the day length coefficient, ranging from 1.02 and 1.06 between the 40° and 50° of northern latitude. Baseline temperature = 10 °C. This index enables viticultural regions to be classified in terms of the sum of the temperatures required for the development of the vines and the ripening of the grapes. HI climatic ripening groups: very cold—HI-3 (HI ≤ 1500), cold—HI-2 (1500 < HI ≤ 1800), temperate—HI-1 (1800 < HI ≤ 2100), temperate–warm—HI+1 (2100 < HI ≤ 2400), warm—HI+2 (2400 < HI ≤ 3000), and very warm—HI+3 (3000 < HI) [35].
Growing degree days (GDD) [34] were calculated for 1 April to 31 October by summing the daily average temperatures (Tavg) above a base value of 10 °C, where values below 10 °C are set to zero:
G D D = 01.04 30.10 m a x ( T a v g 10 ) .
The GDD climatic ripening groups are as follows: Region I—very cold (≤1390), Region II—cold (1391–1670), Region III—warm (1671–1940), Region IV—hot (1941–2220), and Region V—very hot (≥2220).
Some indices for climate extremes were also calculated to determine changes in extreme temperatures. These indices are recommended by the WMO (World Meteorological Organization) and are currently being investigated by researchers [37]. The average temperatures in the period May–June (TMJ) were also calculated by Vršič et al., 2024 [38]. This parameter is important for predicting an increase in disease pressure (e.g., downy mildew), as more severe epidemics can be a direct result of more favorable temperature conditions in May and June [16]. Of the other extreme indices in Table 1, NDTN20, NDT25, NDT35, NDTN-2.5, and NDTN-10 were calculated for the first time for our wine-growing regions. NDTN20 and NDF indices were estimated annually as recommended by the ETCCDI (Expert Team on Climate Change Detection and Indices).
The variables were analyzed using descriptive statistics and trend analyses. As some of the parameters examined in this study were not normally distributed, a more stringent non-parametric Mann–Kendall trend test (MK test) with a significance level of 95% was used for all series [39]. The Mann–Kendall test, like other distribution-free or parametric tests, is very sensitive to an autocorrelation effect (persistence).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Climatic Structure in the Wine-Growing Regions of SLOVENIA

The general climate for the period 1952–2022 for the inland wine-growing regions of Podravje and Posavje is temperate continental, characterized by significant seasonal temperature fluctuations, cold winters, and moderately hot summers with an average annual temperature of 10.3 °C (5.7 to 15.5 °C) for Maribor, 9.9 °C (4.8 to 15.3 °C) for Murska Sobota, 10.2 °C (5.4 to 15.7 °C) for Novo Mesto, and 10.8 °C (5.6 to 16.4 °C) for Črnomelj, with annual precipitation of 998 mm, 801 mm, 1130 mm, and 1281 mm, respectively (Table 2). The Primorska climate is a sub-Mediterranean climate characterized by an average annual temperature of 12.6 °C (7.3 to 18.5 °C) for Bilje and 13.8 °C (9.9 to 18.1 °C) for Koper (near the Adriatic Sea) with a total annual precipitation of 1424 mm for Bilje and 995 mm for Koper.
For wine grape maturity potential, the location temperatures range between 15.5 and 15.8 °C (Podravje), 15.6 and 16.3 °C (Posavje), and 17.5 and 18.6 °C (Primorska) based on the long-term average temperatures of the growing season (GSTavg) (Table 2) [40]. The variability in temperature in the growing season (GSTavg and GSTmin) is similar at all locations, while GSTmax is more pronounced in the coastal location (Koper). The GSTmax temperatures are as follows: 21.5 °C for Maribor, 21.6 °C for Murska Sobota, 21.8 °C for Novo Mesto, 22.6 °C for Črnomelj, 24.0 °C for Bilje, and 23.2 °C for Koper; moreover, the GSTmin values are 10.6, 9.7, 10.0, 10.3, 11.6, and 14.2 °C, respectively.
The number of days with temperatures < 0 °C (NDF) was highest in Podravje (110 d in Murska Sobota) and the lowest in Primorska (29 d in Koper). The lowest number of days with moderately cold days (NDTN-2.5) and the number of days with extremely cold days (NDTN-10) was in the Podravje wine-growing region, followed by the Posavje, while the differences were not significant in the Primorska wine-growing region. The frost-free period (NDFF) was the longest for Primorska averaging 220 d (Bilje) to 264 d (Koper), followed by Podravje with 188-206 d, and Posavje with 193-197 d (Table 2). The number of days during the growing season with temperatures > 30 °C (NDT30) also follows the pattern from inland to the coast, with Podravje and Posavje having fewer days overall, around 13–14 days and 16–22 days, respectively, while Primorska has 22–31 days with maximum temperatures > 30 °C per year. The same pattern of increase is shown by the number of days with temperatures above 25 °C (NDT25), the days with a maximum temperature of more than 35 °C (NDT35), the number of tropical nights (NDTN20), and the average temperature in the period May to June (TMJ) (Table 2).
The values of growing degree days (GDDs) for Podravje, Posavje, and Primorska are between 1278 and 1325, between 1291 and 1420, and between 1631 and 1855 units, respectively (Table 2). These values place Podravje and Posavje in Winkler Region II (cool), which indicates a generally favorable climate for the production of quality wines [34]. The values for Primorska place it in Winkler Region II-III (cool to warm), which is also favorable for the production of quality wines but can be affected by excessive heat in this region, especially in the last two decades. In this region, the NDT30 value has doubled compared to the reference period 1961–1990 (Table 3).
The average values of the Huglin Index, which is possibly more suitable than the Winkler Index for European regions [36], were for Podravje, Posavje, and Primorska between 1831 and 1839, between 1849 and 1985 (HI-1), and between 2197 and 2227 (HI+1), respectively (Table 2). These values assign Podravje and Posavje to the cool climate type, which is suitable for Chardonnay, Sauvignon Blanc, and Pinot Noir, for example, while the values for Primorska are assigned to the warm climate type according to Huglin and are more suitable for Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot [35].
Growing season precipitation (GSP) values generally show that rainfall amounts decreased slightly throughout the period (1952–2022), although the trends were not significant for all locations. GSP differed significantly between stations, increasing from Murska Sobota (Podravje), 574 mm, towards Bilje (Primorska), 870 mm, per vintage (Table 2). The variability in the GSP in this long-term period shows a variation of 16 to 25% between years at all locations. The Murska Sobota location was drier (influence of the Pannonian climate) with a total GSP amount of 574 mm than Maribor, 700 mm, and both locations in Posavje (Novo Mesto, 757 mm, and Črnomelj, 803 mm), and then Bilje (Primorska), 870 mm (Table 3). A similar amount of GSP as in the eastern part of the Podravje wine-growing region (Murska Sobota) was also measured in the coastal area of the Primorska wine-growing region (Koper 613 mm) (Table 3). However, drier conditions with more frequent and longer dry spells were more likely, as higher temperatures can probably lead to a higher evapotranspiration rate, as also noted by Ramos et al. [41]. This is particularly pronounced in the Primorska wine-growing region, especially at the Bilje location, which has the highest average annual precipitation of all six locations at 1424 mm. However, precipitation at this location falls in the form of very intense short-term showers (due to the mixture of Mediterranean and Alpine climate) with increasingly intense dry periods, as the highest number of days with maximum temperatures > 30 °C (NDT30) is recorded here. During the growing season, the annual precipitation falls around 70%, 67–77%, and 60% in Podravje, Posavje, and Primorska, respectively.

3.2. Temperature Parameter Trends

The annual trends of the individual temperature parameters for 71 years (1952–2022) for the wine-growing regions in Slovenia are shown in Table 2. An increase in the average annual temperature (Tavg) for the period 1952–2022 ranged from 0.13 (Koper) to 0.51 °C (Novo Mesto) per decade (Table 2), and the average growing season temperature (GSTavg) ranged from 0.20 (Koper) to 0.39 °C (Novo Mesto) per decade (Table 2 and Figure 2). Over the periods studied, this corresponds to a change in GSTavg of 2.6 °C in Maribor, 2.3 °C in Murska Sobota, 2.8 °C in Novo Mesto, 2.4 °C in Črnomelj, 1.6 °C in Bilje, and 1.4 in Koper (Table 2). These changes can have a major impact on wine production. Many studies have confirmed that viticulture is one of the sectors most sensitive to climate change [42,43,44,45]. Similar trends have been observed in other world’s wine-growing regions [15,46,47], and also in Central Europe. In Italy, the Venetian area experienced an increase in the average vegetation temperature (1964 to 2009) of up to 2.3 °C [40,48]. Lower warming (1.5 °C) was observed in moderate climate conditions of northern wine regions in Slovakia, which has not yet caused sufficient changes in the grapevine phenology to require serious adaptation measures [29]. Climate change led to the earlier development of phenological stages as reported by Ruml et al. (2016) [49] in Serbia and Prša et al. (2022) [50] and Omazić et al. (2024) [51] in Croatia. Some regions in Croatia are becoming less suitable for economically sustainable grape production [52]. In the Western part of the Carpathian basin (Hungary), climate change has several positive effects in the Sopron wine-growing region, this may result in the cultivation of more quality wine grapes and wines [53], which is also expected in other Hungarian regions [54]. The trend of earlier ripening of grapes was also found in northeastern Slovenia in the period 1980–2009 [55]. In Austria, based on temperature evolution, a doubling of the areas suitable for viticulture is predicted to occur by the 2050s [56].
The trends in minimum and maximum temperatures (annual and growing season) are similar at all locations, but the trends in minimum temperatures (Tmin and GSTmin) are slightly more pronounced, except at the Koper and Murska Sobota locations. This could be related to the lower humidity, as found in other wine-growing regions in the USA [57] and Europe [47]. These two locations have less rainfall than the other four. However, the average warming rates of the growing season for the six stations studied in Slovenia are determined by changes in maximum temperatures, with a significant increase in the number of days with a maximum temperature above 30 °C (NDT30), by an average of 3.5 (Črnomelj) to 7 (Koper) days per decade (Table 2). The temperature trends at the six studied locations have led to significant changes in the heat summation indices HI and GDD, whose values have increased on average from 6.2 (Bilje) to 9.4 (Črnomelj) and from 4.2 (Koper) to 8.3 (Novo Mesto) °C units per year, respectively, which for HI means from 440 to 667 and GDDs from 298 to 589 °C units in 71 years of the studied period. Heat accumulation has also increased in other European wine-growing regions, in Spain by 155–464 °C units [41] or 250–300 °C units in the last 30–50 years [47,58]. When comparing these data, two facts must be considered, namely the fact that our study period is almost two decades longer, and the fact that climate change trends are more pronounced in our area after 1990 [33], which is explained in more detail in the following paragraphs.
The trend in the number of days with temperatures < 0 °C (NDF) is decreasing in all locations in inland wine-growing regions. It is more pronounced in locations in Posavje (around 8 days per decade). The number of days between the last spring frost and the first fall frost (NDFF) is increasing (4.1 to 5.5 days per decade). At locations with a Mediterranean climate (Bilje, Koper), however, the trends are in the opposite direction, with the values for NDF increasing and for NDFF decreasing, although the NDFF trends for Bilje are not significant.
Other indices for temperature extremes (NDT25, NDT35, NDTN20, and TMJ) showed an increasing trend at all locations, with the exception of NDTN20 at the Koper location (Table 2). On average, the NDT25 increased from 2.9 d in Bilje to 7.4 d in Koper per decade and the NDT35 from 0.2 d in Murska Sobota to 1 d in Bilje per decade. The same trend can be observed in the number of days with tropical nights (NDTN20). The tendency towards an increase in the mean temperature in May and June (TMJ) was also significant for all locations (p = 0.001), namely the TMJ increased from 0.25 in Koper to 0.4 °C in Novo Mesto per decade (Table 2). More favorable temperature conditions in May and June may lead to higher disease pressure. In response to adaptation to future climate change, more attention will need to be paid to managing early downy mildew infections. Salinari et al. (2006) [16] reported that in response to adaptation to future climate change, more attention needs to be paid to the management of early powdery mildew infections. Their study found that under the most unfavorable climate scenario, two additional fungicide sprays are required compared to current management regimes. This could also be applied to neighboring wine-growing areas in the region.
A more detailed analysis of the individual periods within the long-term study period 1952–2022 shows even clearer changes. Minor changes in bioclimatic parameters were observed for the reference period (1961–1990) (Supplementary Figures S1–S3). The growing season average temperatures (GSTavg) were close to 15.0 °C for all stations in Podravje and Posavje, namely 14.8 °C for Murska Sobota and Novo Mesto, 15.2 °C for Maribor, and 15.6 °C for Črnomelj. The GSTavg values were higher in Primorska, 16.8 °C in Bilje, and 18.3 °C in Koper. The changes between 1991 and 2022 generally appear to be the most dramatic. The GSTavg values increased for all six stations and amounted to 16.6, 16.3, 16.5, 17.1, 18.2, and 18.9 °C (Table 3), with GSTavg trends for this period being 0.034, 0.040, 0.048, 0.057, 0.056, and 0.084 °C per year for Maribor, Murska Sobota, Novo Mesto, Črnomelj, Bilje, and Koper, respectively ( Supplementary Figures S1–S3). The warming was due to the changes in GSTmin and GSTmax at all locations, but the trends in GSTmax were higher, except at the Črnomelj station, where the trend in GSTmin was more pronounced than in GSTmax (Supplementary Figures S1–S3).
The number of days with maximum temperatures > 30 °C (NDT30) increased at all locations in the period 1991–2022. Compared to the reference period 1961–1990, the NDT30 increased from 3 to 15 days per decade (Supplementary Figures S1–S3). The NDT30 for Podravje, Posavje, and Primorska was 22 to 23, 25 to 30, and 38 to 41 days, respectively (Table 3), and was two to four times higher compared to the reference period (2.5 to 6.6 times higher after 2010). In the period 1991-2022, the NDT30 increased in the Primorska wine-growing region by 1.1 days per year in Bilje and by 1.5 days per year in Koer. The NDT30 increased from 30 and 23 days in the first decade of this period to 53 and 55 days after 2010 in Bilje and Koper, respectively. A similar trend can also be observed at the Črnomelj location (1 day per year). At the other three meteorological stations, Novo Mesto, Maribor, and Murska Sobota, the trend was less pronounced; in Murska Sobota it amounted to 0.3 days per year. In the reference period (1961–1990), the NDT30 trend was even slightly negative.
If the warming trend continues over the next 30 years at the same rate as it has since the 1990s, it is to be expected that the wine-growing regions of Podravje and Posavje will also move completely into the warm climate group. Daily maximum temperatures of 30 °C are critical for optimal grapevine development and can lead to plant stress, a decrease in photosynthesis, a greater lack of water, premature ripening of the grapes, and drying of the berries, even in early ripening varieties such as Bouvier in Slovenia [33]. However, a few days with temperatures above 30 °C during the ripening period can be beneficial [9,48], especially for late-ripening varieties [33]. At the Bilje location, there were already an average of 22 hot days in the reference period, which almost doubled in the period 1991–2022. At the Koper location, there were only eight such days during the reference period, and the number of NDT30 days was five times higher in the following thirty years (1991–2022).
The total warming of average temperatures in the growing season (GSTavg) was between 1.4 and 1.7 °C for all locations, except for the coastal location (Koper), where the warming was only 0.6 °C, over the respective periods (1991–2022) compared to the reference period (1961–1990). In addition, the GSTavg warming after 2010 was 1.8–2.0 °C, 2.1–2.2 °C, and 1.6–1.9 °C in Podravje, Posavje, and Primorska (Table 3). Similar results were also found in other European wine-growing regions [47] with an average warming of the growing seasons of 1.7 °C in the last 30–50 years.
The warming trends in the period between 1991 and 2022 are also confirmed by the increase in the heat sum indices. The growing degree days (GDDs), also known as the Winkler Index (WI) and Huglin Index (HI), are often used to assess the climatic suitability for specific grape varieties and/or wine styles and are variations of degree days (heat sum) or heat accumulation (Table 1). The trends for both parameters show significant changes at each location. However, changes were greater in relative terms, with HI giving more weight to maximum temperatures (Table 1) and GSTmax increasing more at all locations. The GDDs increased by 54, 67, 80, 103, 107, and 170 °C units, while HI increased by 82, 75, 106, 113, 121, and 183 °C units per decade for Maribor, Murska Sobota, Novo Mesto, Črnomelj, Bilje, and Koper (Supplementary Figures S1–S3). The average values of these two indices in this period were around 300 °C units higher for the GDDs (except Koper 110) and from 265 to 331 °C units higher for HI than in the reference period (Table 3). Heat accumulation has also increased by 250–300 °C units in other European wine-growing regions over the last 30–50 years [47], and increased heat accumulation (WI and HI) in inland Spanish wine-growing regions has been reported, but not in coastal regions.
HI values of 1700–1900 °C units [35] indicate that the Podravje and Posavje wine-growing region is suitable for medium-late varieties such as Chardonnay, Sauvignon Blanc, etc. In the reference period (1961–1990), the HI value exceeded the value of 1900 °C units at both stations in Podravje and in Novo Mesto in Posavje only once (1983) and in Črnomelj ten times, while in the period 1991–2021, the HI value exceeded this value in more than two-thirds of the years at all stations in Podravje and Posavje (in Črnomelj, the value of 1900 °C units was not exceeded in only three years in the 1991–2021 period). In addition, the HI also exceeded the value of 2100 °C units in this period, which was most pronounced after 2010, e.g., in Črnomelj in half of the years. In general, in the period 1991–2022, the values of the GDDs increased by 23–26% and HI by 16–18%, while after 2010, even the GDDs increased by 27–34% and HI by 23–26% compared to the reference period (1961–1990) (Table 3).
Based on the classification of wine-growing regions into climate maturity groups [24] and the increase in GSTavg in the last decade of the observation period, it can be concluded that this wine-growing region is suitable for growing some grapevine varieties from the warm climate maturity group [34]. Initial results from the process of Merlot introduction in these two regions (not published) confirm this prediction.
In the Primorska wine-growing region, the HI value did not exceed the value of 1900 °C units (first half of HI-1 ripening group) in the reference period (1961–1990) in only four years at either station. In Bilje and Koper, it averaged between 2062 and 2068 °C units (second half of HI-1), while the HI value exceeded the value of 2300 °C units (second half of HI+1) in the period 1991–2022. The HI value for Bilje was 2327 and for Koper 2400 °C (on the border of HI+2) units, which shows that this region belongs to the moderately warm ripening group for grapes, and based on the values in the last decade (2011–2022), Bilje with an average of 2451 °C units (HI+2) and Koper with 2591 °C units (HI+2), these locations are already in the warm ripening group [59] according to Jones et al. [25]. The result of this warming may be that some areas that are still suitable for growing certain varieties will no longer exist in the future, or it will no longer be possible to produce premium wines on them as reported by White et al. 2006 [60]. As Tate 2001 [61] also noted, pests and diseases that are currently restricted by the winter cold will extend their range northwards.

3.3. Precipitation Parameters Trends

The high inter- and intra-annual precipitation variability has weakened many of the trends in precipitation parameters (Figure 3). Annual precipitation (AP) did not change significantly at any of the locations in the long-term period (1952–2022), only the trend for Maribor (Podravje) showed a significant decrease in precipitation (−3 L m2yr−1). The total growing season precipitation (GSP) showed significantly decreasing trends in Maribor (−1.7 mm m2yr−1), Bilje (−2.8 mm m2yr−1), and Koper (−1.8 mm m2yr−1) (Table 2). The inter-annual variability in the climate makes it difficult to assess tendencies in precipitation distribution patterns and possible effects of climate change. Nevertheless, some recent studies indicate significant changes in extreme events, such as more frequent and more extreme droughts, an increase in precipitation in the cold season, and drying out in the warm season [62,63,64]. It is therefore to be expected that the frequency, intensity, and distribution of precipitation will change due to the increased speed of the water cycle, which will probably also have an impact on the water supply in agriculture. In Europe, decreasing precipitation trends or changes in the seasonality of precipitation have been observed for large parts of the Mediterranean region [63,65]. This also confirms our results for the growing season in the Mediterranean region of Primorska (both locations). In the continental part of Europe, these trends were exceptionally absent [47]. Many of these studies were conducted two decades ago, and in many places, the precipitation pattern has changed. The trends in annual and growing season precipitation for the Maribor location in the continental wine-growing region of Podravje confirmed our assumption.
The precipitation pattern is spreading from the east towards Maribor (the eastern part of the Alps), especially after 2010, and is becoming more and more similar to the Murska Sobota location (on the edge of the Pannonian climate) (Figure 3). The long-term average (1952–2022) of precipitation in the growing season (April–October) for Maribor is 700 mm m2yr−1 and decreases to 591 mm m2yr−1 after 2010. The average amount of precipitation after 2010 is 134 mm m2yr−1 lower (−18%), compared to the 725 mm m2yr−1 in the reference period 1961–1999 (Table 3). A similar pattern of decline in GSP after 2010 as in Maribor is also observed at both locations in Primorska, namely 131 mm m2yr−1 (Bilje) and 103 mm m2yr−1 (Koper). These decreases could be critical, as the vines should have sufficient access to soil moisture from flowering to véraison and should not be exposed to high drought stress.
The most stable amount of precipitation remains at the Črnomelj location with 773 mm m2yr−1. The least changed amount of precipitation is recorded at the Murska Sobota location, which amounts to 575 mm over the entire long-term period (1952–2022) (Table 3). The highest precipitation amounts were recorded in Bilje (inland part of Primorska), where large-scale erosion events frequently occur. This is due to both the high rainfall and soil management system (soil tillage) in Primorska (in Podravje and Posavje the soil is green-covered), and the increasing extremes are likely to have additional negative impacts. Jones et al. [47] found that precipitation levels have not changed significantly in other European wine regions. However, higher temperatures lead to higher evapotranspiration. Moisture deficiency in the berry growth phase, especially in Koper (Primorska) and Murska Sobota (Podravje), could reduce cell division and lead to significant dehydration and sunburn, which in combination can lead to a reduction in berry size and yield, as also noted by Peacock [66]. In Murska Sobota, the amount of precipitation in the vegetation was already at a similar level in the reference period and in the last three decades as in the last decade in Maribor, which could indicate to a certain extent that the influence of the Pannonian climate on Maribor has become increasingly noticeable in the last decade.
Even though the trends of decreasing precipitation for Novo Mesto are not significant, on average 14% less precipitation was recorded after 2010 than in the reference period. In Črnomelj, the amount of precipitation in the vegetation was consistently at a similar level (over 770 mm m2yr−1), although the distribution of precipitation and the intensity of individual weather phenomena must be taken into account. The average amount of precipitation in the coastal area (Koper) is only two-thirds of the amount of precipitation in Bilje. The distribution of precipitation in Primorska is the least favorable of all wine-growing regions. The distribution of precipitation and the intensity of individual weather phenomena must also be evaluated.
As far as the future climate is concerned, an average warming of 2.0 °C is predicted for most of the world’s best wine-growing regions by 2050 [67,68,69]. It is predicted that parts of southern Europe will become too hot to produce high-quality wines and that northern regions will acquire vineyard potential. Further warming could lead to grape varieties exceeding their climatic optimum, making current wine styles more difficult to produce.

4. Conclusions

The general conclusion of this study is that the greatest effects of climate change were felt in all three wine-growing regions after 1990. The greatest increase was in the number of hot days with a temperature above 30 °C (NDT30), which also had the greatest impact on other bioclimatic parameters, e.g., the average air temperature in the growing season, the sum of effective temperatures (GDDs) and the Huglin Index. In the period 1991–2022, the average growing season temperature (GSTavg) increased by about 1.5 °C or more in all wine-growing regions compared to the reference period, except in the coastal region of Koper, where the GSTavg temperature is 0.6 °C higher. In regions with a continental climate, the GSTavg temperature rose to around 17 °C and in the Mediterranean region to around 19 °C, which may be reflected in the earlier ripening of the grapes. If the warming trend continues in the next 30 years in a similar way as it has since the 1990s, it is expected that the wine-growing regions of Podravje and Posavje will completely transition to the warm climate ripening group. Another very important bioclimatic parameter at higher temperatures is the amount of precipitation during the growth of the vines. The total amount of precipitation in the growing season (GSP) shows a downward trend in all three wine-growing regions. The total amount of precipitation has decreased significantly in three locations, both in the maritime locations (Bilje and Koper) and in the inland locations (Maribor). As far as recent precipitation is concerned, it appears to be increasingly unevenly distributed, not only in the vegetation areas but also in the wine-growing regions. Therefore, the network of meteorological stations is even more important for the monitoring of weather phenomena and for the adoption and implementation of technological measures in the vineyards. For the network of meteorological stations to function well, its financing should continue to be the responsibility of the state and the municipalities.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/horticulturae10080854/s1, Figure S1: Trends in the bioclimatic parameters fort the meteorological stations Maribor and Murska Sobota (wine-growing region Podravje) in Slovenia for the periods 1961–1990 and 1991–2022; Figure S2: Trends in the bioclimatic parameters fort the meteorological stations Novo mesto and Črnomelj (wine–growing region Posavje) in Slovenia for the periods 1961–1990 and 1991–2022; Figure S3: Trends in the bioclimatic parameters fort the meteorological stations Bilje and Koper (wine–growing region Primorska) in Slovenia for the periods 1961–1990 and 1991–2022.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.V.; methodology, S.V. and B.P.; software, A.P.; validation S.V. and A.P.; formal analysis, S.V. and A.P.; investigation, S.V.; resources, S.V.; data curation, S.V., B.P. and A.P.; writing—original draft preparation, S.V.; writing—review and editing, S.V., B.P. and A.P.; visualization, S.V.; supervision, S.V. and B.P.; project administration, S.V.; funding acquisition, S.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Slovenian National Research Agency and the Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Food of the Republic of Slovenia (grant no. CRP V4-2202) via the project “Guidelines for adapting grape and wine production to climate change and market demands”.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Slovenian Environment Agency for providing the climate data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of this study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Naulleau, A.; Gary, C.; Prévot, L.; Hossard, H. Strategies for adaptation to climate change in grapevine production—A systematic review. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 607859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Schultz, H.R.; Lebon, E. Modelling the effect of climate change on grapevine water relations.VII International Symposium on Grapevine Physiology and Biotechnology. Acta Hortic. 2005, 689, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Branković, Č.; Srnec, L.; Patarčić, M. An Assessment of Global and Regional Climate Change Based on the EH5OM Climate Model Ensemble. Clim. Chang. 2010, 98, 21–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mosedale, J.R.; Wilson, R.J.; Maclean, I.M.D. Climate change and crop exposure to adverse weather: Changes to frost risk and grapevine flowering conditions. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Venios, X.; Korkas, E.; Nisiotou, A.; Banilas, G. Grapevine Responses to Heat Stress and Global Warming. Plants 2020, 9, 1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fraga, H. Climate change: A new challenge for the winemaking sector. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Carter, T.R.; Parry, M.L.; Porter, J.H. Climatic Change and Future Agroclimatic Potential in Europe. Int. J. Climatol. 1991, 11, 251–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Menzel, A.; Fabian, P. Growing season extended in Europe. Nature 1999, 397, 659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jones, G.V.; Davis, R.E. Climate Influences on Grapevine Phenology, Grape Composition, and Wine Production and Quality for Bordeaux, France. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2000, 51, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Keller, M. Climate Change Impacts on Vineyards in Warm and Dry Areas: Challenges and Opportunities. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2023, 74, 0740033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lobell, D.B.; Field, C.B.; Cahill, K.N.; Bonfils, C. Impacts of future climate change on Californian perennial crop yields: Model projections with climate and crop uncertainties. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2006, 141, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Delrot, S.; Grimplet, J.; Carbonell-Bejerano, P.; Schwandner, A.; Bert, P.F.; Bavaresco, L.; Costa, L.D.; Di Gaspero, G.; Duchêne, E.; Hausmann, L.; et al. Genetic and genomic approaches for adaptation of grapevine to climate change. In Genomic Designing of Climate-Smart Fruit Crops; Kole, C., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 157–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kenny, G.J.; Harrison, P.A. The effects of climate variability and change on grape suitability in Europe. J. Wine Res. 1992, 3, 163–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Laget, F.; Tondut, J.; Deloire, A.; Kelly, M.T. Climate trends in a specific Mediterranean viticultural area between 1950 and 2006. J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin. 2008, 42, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jones, G.V.; White, M.A.; Cooper, O.R.; Storchmann, K. Climate change and global wine quality. Clim. Chang. 2005, 73, 319–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Salinari, F.; Giosuè, S.; Tubiello, F.N.; Rettori, A.; Rossi, V.; Spanna, F.; Rosenzweig, C.; Gullino, M.L. Downy mildew (Plasmopara viticola) epidemics on grapevine under climate change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2006, 12, 1299–1307. [Google Scholar]
  17. Töpfer, R.; Trapp, O. A cool climate perspective on grapevine breeding: Climate change and sustainability are driving forces for changing varieties in a traditional market. Theor. Appl. Gen. 2022, 135, 3947–3960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. van Leeuwen, C.; Destrac-Irvine, A.; Dubernet, M.; Duchêne, E.; Gowdy, M.; Marguerit, E.; Pieri, P.; Parker, A.; de Rességuier, L.; Ollat, O. An Update on the Impact of Climate Change in Viticulture and Potential Adaptations. Agronomy 2019, 9, 514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Montagne, D.; Cornu, S. Do we need to include soil evolution module in models for prediction of future climate change? Clim. Chang. 2010, 98, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Prior, B. Inventory management to adapt to climate change. Das Dtsch. Weinmagazin 2007, 10, 22–27. [Google Scholar]
  21. Vršič, S.; Ivančič, A.; Pulko, B.; Valdhuber, J. Effect of soil management systems on erosion and nutrition loss in vineyards on steep slopes. J. Environ. Biol. 2011, 32, 289–294. [Google Scholar]
  22. Vršič, S. Soil erosion and earthworm population responses to soil management systems in steep-slope vineyards. Plant Soil Environ. 2012, 57, 258–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Becker, N. Site Selection for Viticulture in Cooler Climates Using Local Climatic Information. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Cool Climate Viticulture and Enology, the Valley River Inn, Eugene, Oregon, 25–28 June 1984; Oregon State University Technical Publication 7628: Corvallis, OR, USA, 1985; pp. 20–34. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kenny, G.J.; Shao, J. An assessment of a latitude–temperature index for predicting climate suitability for grapes in Europe. J. Hortic. Sci. 1992, 67, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jones, G.V.; Duff, A.A.; Hall, A.; Myers, J. Spatial analysis of climate in winegrape growing regions in the western United States. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2010, 61, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Duchene, E.; Huard, F.; Dumas, V.; Schneider, C.; Merdinoglu, D. The challenge of adapting grapevine varieties to climate change. Clim. Res. 2010, 41, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jorquera-Fontena, E.; Orrego-Verdugo, R. Impact of global warming on the phenology of a variety of grapevine grown in Southern Chile. Agrociencia 2010, 44, 427–435. [Google Scholar]
  28. Webb, L.B.; Whetton, P.H.; Barlow, E.W.R. Observed trends in winegrape maturity in Australia. Glob. Change Biol. 2011, 17, 2707–2719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bernáth, S.; Paulen, O.; Šiška, B.; Kusá, Z.; Tóth, F. Influence of Climate Warming on Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) Phenology in Conditions of Central Europe (Slovakia). Plants 2021, 10, 1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ogrin, D.; Repe, B.; Štaut, L.; Svetlin, D.; Ogrin, M. Climate classification of Slovenia based on data from the period 1991–2020. Dela 2023, 59, 5–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vršič, S.; Pulko, B.; Perko, A. Climate change trends in the wine-growing regions of Slovenia. In Proceedings of the 6th Slovenian Viticulture and Wine Congress, Ptuj, Slovenia, 21–22 April 2023; Vršič, S., Ed.; Agricultural Forestry Institute Ptuj: Ptuj, Slovenia, 2023; pp. 97–111. [Google Scholar]
  32. ARSO (Slovenian Environment Agency). The Daily Precipitation and Temperature Values for the Period from 1952 to 2022; Slovenian Environment Agency: Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  33. Vršič, S.; Vodovnik–Plevnik, T. Reactions of vines varieties to climate changes in NE Slovenia. Plant Soil Environ. 2012, 58, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Winkler, A.J.; Cook, J.A.; Kliewer, W.M.; Lider, L.A. General Viticulture; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  35. Huglin, P. Nouveau mode d’évaluation des possibilités héliothermiques d’un milieu viticole. In Proc Symp Int sur L’ecologie de la Vigne; Ministére de l’Agriculture et de l’Industrie Alimentaire: Contança, Romania, 1978; pp. 89–98. [Google Scholar]
  36. Blanco-Ward, D.; Garcia-Queijeiro, J.M.; Jones, G.V. Spatial climate variability and viticulture in the Miño River Valley of Spain. Vitis 2007, 46, 63–70. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhang, X.; Alexander, L.; Hegerl, G.C.; Jones, P.; Tank, A.K.; Peterson, T.C.; Trewin, B.; Zwiers, F.W. Indices for monitoring changes in extremes based on daily temperature and precipitation data. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Chang. 2011, 2, 851–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vršič, S.; Pulko, B.; Vodovnik-Plevnik, T.; Perko, A. The Impact of Climatic Warming on Earlier Wine-Grape Ripening in Northeastern Slovenia. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hirsch, R.M.; Alexander, R.B.; Smith, R.A. Selection of methods for the detection and estimation of trends in water quality. Water Resour. Res. 1991, 27, 803–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jones, G. Climate change and wine: Observations, impacts and future implications. Wine Ind. J. 2006, 21, 21–26. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ramos, M.C.; Jones, G.V.; Martínez-Casasnovas, J.A. Structure and trends in climate parameters affecting winegrape production in northeast Spain. Clim. Res. 2008, 38, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Machar, I.; Vlckova, V.; Bucek, A.; Vrublova, K.; Filippovova, J.; Brus, J. Environmental Modelling of Climate Change Impact on Grapevines: Case Study from the Czech Republic. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2017, 26, 1927–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Carroquino, J.; Garcia-Casarejos, N.; Gargallo, P. Classification of Spanish wineries according to their adoption of measures against climate change. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 244, 142–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Olesen, J.E.; Bindi, M. Consequences of climate change for european agricultural productivity, land use and policy. Eur. J. Agron. 2002, 16, 239–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Keller, M. Managing grapevines to optimise fruit development in a challenging environment: A climate change primer for viticulturists. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2010, 16, 56–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mozell, M.R.; Thach, L. The impact of climate change on the global wine industry. Wine Econ. Policy 2014, 3, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jones, G.V.; Duchêne, E.; Tomasi, D.; Yuste, J.; Braslavska, O.; Schultz, H.; Martinez, C.; Boso, S.; Langellier, F.; Perucho, C.; et al. Changes in European Winegrape Phenology and Relationships with Climate; Proceedings GESCO: Geisenheim, Germany, 2005; pp. 55–61. [Google Scholar]
  48. Tomasi, D.; Jones, G.V.; Giust, M.; Lovat, L.; Gaiotti, F. Grapevine phenology and climate change: Relationships and trends in the Veneto region of Italy for 1964–2009. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2011, 62, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ruml, M.; Korać, N.; Vujadinović, M.; Vuković, A.; Ivanišević, D. Response of grapevine phenology to recent temperature change and variability in the wine-producing area of Sremski Karlovci, Serbia. J. Agric. Sci. 2016, 154, 186–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Prša., I.; Rakić, V.; Rašić, D.; Vučetić, V.; Telišman Prtenjak, M.; Omazić, B.; Blašković, L.; Karoglan, M.; Preiner, D.; Drenjančević, M.; et al. Influence of Weather and Climatic Conditions on the Viticultural Production in Croatia. In Proceedings of the Terclim 2022, XIVth International Terroir Congress 2nd ClimWine Symposium, Bordeaux, France, 3–8 July 2022. [Google Scholar]
  51. Omazić, B.; Telišman Prtenjak, M.; Kvakić, M.; Meštrić, J.; Bubola, M.; Prša, I.; Karoglan, M. Changes in grapevine budburst and harvest dates in Croatia under current and future climate conditions. EGU24-4051. In Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 April 2024. [Google Scholar]
  52. Omazić, B.; Telišman Prtenjak, M.; Prša, I.; Belušić Vozila, A.; Vučetić, V.; Karoglan, M.; Karoglan Kontić, J.; Prša, Ž.; Anić, M.; Šimon, S.; et al. Climate change impacts on viticulture in Croatia: Viticultural zoning and future potential. Int. J. Climatol. 2020, 40, 5634–5655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kovacs, E.; Puskas, J.; Pozsgai, A. Positive Effects of Climate Change on the Field of Sopron Wine-Growing Region in Hungary. In Perspectives on Atmospheric Sciences; Karacostas, T., Bais, A., Nastos, P., Eds.; Springer Atmospheric Sciences: Cham, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  54. Gaal, M.; Moriondo, M.; Bindi, M. Modelling the impact of climate change on the Hungarian wine regionsusing random forest. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2012, 10, 121–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vršič, S.; Šuštar, V.; Pulko, B.; Kraner-Šumenjak, T. Trends in climate parameters affecting winegrape ripening in northeastern Slovenia. Clim. Res. 2014, 58, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Eitzinger, J.; Kubu, G.; Formayer, H.; Gerersdorfer, T. Climatic wine growing potential under future climate scenarious in Austria. In Proceedings of the Sustainable Development and Bioclimate: Reviewed Conference Proceedings, Vienna, Austria, 5–8 October 2009; pp. 146–147. [Google Scholar]
  57. Jones, G.V. Climate change in the western United States grape growing regions. Acta Hortic. 2005, 689, 41–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Duchêne, E.; Schneider, C. Grapevine and climatic changes: A glance at the situation in Alsace. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2005, 25, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Huglin, P. Biologie et Écologie de la Vigne; Lavoisier: Paris, France, 1986; 372p. [Google Scholar]
  60. White, M.A.; Diffenbaugh, N.S.; Jones, G.V.; Pal, J.S.; Giorgi, F. Extreme heat reduces and shifts United States premium wine production in the 21st century. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 11217–11222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Tate, A.B. Global warming’s impact on vine. J. Wine Res. 2001, 12, 95–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ramos, M.C. Rainfall distribution patterns and their change over time in a Mediterranean area. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2001, 69, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sumner, G.; Homar, V.; Ramis, C. Precipitation seasonality in eastern and southern coastal Spain. Int. J. Climatol. 2001, 21, 219–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Brunetti, M.; Maugeru, M.; Nanni, T.; Navarra, A. Droughts and extreme events in regional daily Italian precipitation series. Int. J. Climatol. 2002, 22, 543–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lana, X.; Serra, C.; Burgueno, A. Trends affecting pluvio- metric indices at the Fabra observatory (Barcelona, NE Spain) from 1917 to 1999. Int. J. Climatol. 2003, 23, 315–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Peacock, B. Water Management for Grapevines. University of California, Tulare County, Pub. IG1-2005, 95. Available online: https://ucanr.edu/sites/Tulare_County/files/82035.pdf (accessed on 12 July 2024).
  67. Lebon, E. Changements climatiques: Quelles conséquences prévisibles sur la viticulture? In 6émes Rencontres Rhodaniennes; Institut Rhodanien: Orange, France, 2002; pp. 31–36. [Google Scholar]
  68. Stock, M. Klimaveränderungen fordern die Winzer—Bereitschaft zur Anpassung ist erforderlich. Geisenheimer Berichte 2005, 57, 29–48. [Google Scholar]
  69. Webb, L.B.; Whetton, P.H.; Barlow, E.W.R. Modelled impact of future climate change on the phenology of winegrapes in Australia. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2007, 13, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Map with study regions and climate stations (Maribor, Muska Sobota, Novo Mesto, Črnomelj, Bilje, and Koper) in the wine-growing regions of Podravje, Posavje, and Primorska in Slovenia.
Figure 1. Map with study regions and climate stations (Maribor, Muska Sobota, Novo Mesto, Črnomelj, Bilje, and Koper) in the wine-growing regions of Podravje, Posavje, and Primorska in Slovenia.
Horticulturae 10 00854 g001
Figure 2. Temperature trends (average, maximum, and minimum) during the growing season (1 April to 31 October) in Maribor, Murska Sobota (Podravje), Novo Mesto, Črnomelj (Posavje), Bilje, and Koper (Primorska) in Slovenia for the long-term period 1952–2022.
Figure 2. Temperature trends (average, maximum, and minimum) during the growing season (1 April to 31 October) in Maribor, Murska Sobota (Podravje), Novo Mesto, Črnomelj (Posavje), Bilje, and Koper (Primorska) in Slovenia for the long-term period 1952–2022.
Horticulturae 10 00854 g002
Figure 3. Precipitation trends (AP—annual and GSP—growing season, from 1 April to 31 October) in Maribor, Murska Sobota (Podravje), Novo Mesto, Črnomelj (Posavje), Bilje, and Koper (Primorska) in Slovenia for the long-term period 1952–2022.
Figure 3. Precipitation trends (AP—annual and GSP—growing season, from 1 April to 31 October) in Maribor, Murska Sobota (Podravje), Novo Mesto, Črnomelj (Posavje), Bilje, and Koper (Primorska) in Slovenia for the long-term period 1952–2022.
Horticulturae 10 00854 g003
Table 1. Analyzed bioclimatic parameters.
Table 1. Analyzed bioclimatic parameters.
ParameterParameter Description
TavgAverage annual temperature, °C
TmaxAverage annual maximum temperature, °C
TminAverage annual minimum temperature, °C
GSTavgAverage growing season temperature (April to October), °C
GSTmaxAverage growing season maximum temperature (April–October), °C
GSTminAverage growing season minimum temperature (April–October), °C
HIHuglin Index (April to September), °C units
GDDsGrowing degree days (sum of temperature above 10 °C), °C units
TMJAverage temperature in May and June, °C
NDTN20Tropical nights: number of days with TN > 20 °C days
NDT25Number of days with maximum temperature > 25 °C
NDT30Number of days with maximum temperature > 30 °C
NDT35Number of days with maximum temperature > 35 °C
NDFNumber of days with minimum temperature <0 °C (frost occurrence)
NDFFNumber of days between last and first frost (frost-free period length)
NDTN-2.5Moderate cold days: number of days with TN < −2.5 °C days
NDTN-10Extreme cold days: number of days with TN < −10 °C days
APTotal annual precipitation, mm/m2
GSPTotal growing season precipitation (April to October), mm/m2
Table 2. Mean and trend of bioclimatic parameters (standard and tested) for the 6 meteorological stations (in 3 wine-growing regions) Maribor and Murska Sobota (Podravje), Črnomelj and Novo Mesto (Posavje), and Bilje and Koper (Primorska) in Slovenia for the long-term period 1952–2022. Bold numbers indicate significant trends (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 2. Mean and trend of bioclimatic parameters (standard and tested) for the 6 meteorological stations (in 3 wine-growing regions) Maribor and Murska Sobota (Podravje), Črnomelj and Novo Mesto (Posavje), and Bilje and Koper (Primorska) in Slovenia for the long-term period 1952–2022. Bold numbers indicate significant trends (p ≤ 0.05).
Wine-Growing
Region/Station
Podravje/MariborPosavje/Novo MestoPrimorska/Bilje
VariableVariableVariable
ParametersMeanSDTrend yr−1MK-TestpMeanSDTrend yr−1MK-TestpMeanSDTrend yr−1MK-Testp
Tavg10.30.990.0370.6280.00110.21.000.0510.6030.00112.60.790.0170.2990.001
Tmax15.51.140.0380.5420.00115.71.190.0510.4400.00118.50.820.0210.3670.060
Tmin5.71.060.0420.660.0015.41.100.0530.6720.0017.31.030.0210.3050.001
GSTavg15.80.990.0370.5890.00115.61.00.0390.5650.00117.50.930.0230.3280.534
GSTmax21.51.150.0380.4910.00121.81.30.0340.3710.00124.00.970.0240.3150.001
GSTmin10.61.020.0410.6150.00110.01.10.0450.6630.00111.61.220.0310.3570.124
HI18392067.030.5590.00118492188.760.4620.00121971886.180.3860.020
GDDs13251866.880.5990.00112911928.350.5730.00116311914.770.3380.305
TMJ17.01.280.0380.480.00116.731.310.0400.4780.00118.261.250.0310.3650.001
NDTN201.552.540.0630.4440.0010.451.040.0230.4120.0013.043.750.0690.2970.001
NDT2563.517.60.630.5490.00168.0718.90.520.3870.00195.215.60.290.2360.004
NDT3013.311.80.570.5020.0011614.20.390.3900.02131.015.60.450.3830.030
NDT350.751.640.0250.2750.0031.313.290.0550.2630.0052.143.700.100.4650.001
NDF9519−0.56−0.4110.00110019−0.81−0.4220.0026718.40.03−0.0080.927
NDFF206220.530.3400.310197220.550.3450.24722028.9−0.20−0.0690.401
NDTN-2.554.916.1−0.49−0.4110.00154.5116.1−0.44−0.3940.00136.214.70.0450.03390.684
NDTN-108.27.77−0.22−0.4470.0019.067.76−0.20−0.4480.0011.392.390.014−0.0410.659
AP998150−2.88−0.2520.00211301900.16−0.0580.4811424289−2.78−0.1390.087
GSP700124−1.68−0.2140.008757146−0.18−0.1130.165870209−2.83−0.1860.022
Podravje/Murska SobotaPosavje/ČrnomeljPrimorska/Koper
Tavg9.90.990.0340.5650.00110.80.970.0280.4840.00113.80.640.0130.2590.001
Tmax15.31.160.0360.5200.00116.41.130.0300.4000.01018.11.310.0400.4060.006
Tmin4.81.050.0380.5990.0015.60.920.0250.4050.0079.90.91−0.008−0.1230.131
GSTavg15.51.00.0330.5110.00116.31.00.0340.4520.00118.60.860.0200.2830.001
GSTmax21.61.20.0380.4460.00122.61.20.0220.2630.00123.21.610.0420.4040.006
GSTmin9.71.00.0370.5760.00110.31.00.0330.4660.00114.20.93−0.007−0.1060.192
HI18312136.430.4780.00119852099.370.3660.06422272367.440.4120.004
GDDs12781866.210.5320.00114201985.800.4640.00118551804.180.2770.001
TMJ16.81.250.0370.4750.00117.441.330.0350.3880.00118.991.230.0250.350.001
NDTN200.490.880.0210.4290.0011.132.250.0610.4460.00117.812.10.0330.5860.558
NDT2564.817.40.570.4950.00179.317.50.310.2430.00384.225.10.740.3760.001
NDT3014.112.10.370.4470.00122.213.90.350.2820.00122.220.70.700.4370.001
NDT350.832.040.0230.2090.0271.83.380.0640.2530.0051.373.290.080.4130.001
NDF11018−0.43−0.3740.05010016.7−0.76−0.1380.0922917.60.240.2250.006
NDFF188180.410.3590.11119320.30.410.2650.00126431−0.38−0.1810.039
NDTN-2.564.915.5−0.364−0.3130.00159.613.4−0.15−0.1230.1359.758.670.040.0830.313
NDTN-1013.010.0−0.264−0.4170.00110.97.43−0.21−0.2720.0010.110.43−0.003−0.1510.117
AP801112−0.170.0210.80012811840.590.0510.532995185−1.83−0.1330.101
GSP574940.280.0370.6558031650.620.0570.487612152−1.85−0.2080.010
Parameter abbreviations are in Table 1.
Table 3. Averages of bioclimatic parameters for the six meteorological stations (Maribor, Murska Sobota, Novo Mesto, Črnomelj, Bilje, and Koper) in three wine–growing regions (Podravje *, Posavje **, and Primorska ***) in Slovenia for the period 1952–2022, the reference period 1961–1990, the period 1991–2022, and by decades for the 1991–2022 period.
Table 3. Averages of bioclimatic parameters for the six meteorological stations (Maribor, Murska Sobota, Novo Mesto, Črnomelj, Bilje, and Koper) in three wine–growing regions (Podravje *, Posavje **, and Primorska ***) in Slovenia for the period 1952–2022, the reference period 1961–1990, the period 1991–2022, and by decades for the 1991–2022 period.
Periods/ParametersGSTavg ± SDGSP ± SDGDDs ± SDHI ± SDT > 30 °C ± SD
MARIBOR *
1952–202215.8 ± 0.99700.5 ± 124.31324.9 ± 186.51839.0 ± 206.613.2 ± 11.8
1961–199015.2 ± 0.59725.4 ± 116.51205.5 ± 108.01704.5 ± 120.05.8 ± 3.8
1991–202216.6 ± 0.80669.2 ± 128.21496.5 ± 155.92017.1 ± 199.821.9 ± 12.7
1991–200016.2 ± 0.75738.9 ± 142.11415.8 ± 130.21914.0 ± 163.413.5 ± 9.9
2001–201016.7 ± 0.48692.9 ± 97.41496.5 ± 121.91996.9 ± 169.221.8 ± 13.2
2011–202217.0 ± 0.57591.3 ± 128.81540.5 ± 106.42119.7 ± 145.528.5 ± 8.9
MURSKA SOBOTA *
1952–202215.5 ± 1.00574.5 ± 94.11277.9 ± 186.31831.2 ± 212.814.1 ± 12.1
1961–199014.8 ± 0.65577.9 ± 100.31142.9 ± 111.11686.3 ± 125.46.3 ± 4.6
1991–202216.3 ± 0.87578.2 ± 93.61432.3 ± 168.52002.9 ± 201.623.0 ± 12.6
1991–200015.9 ± 0.75571.4 ± 138.71364.3 ± 125.71914.7 ± 164.817.3 ± 12.6
2001–201016.3 ± 0.47581.4 ± 88.71414.4 ± 119.31985.3 ± 164.823.9 ± 12.4
2011–202216.8 ± 0.59581.3 ± 74.41518.5 ± 107.12091.1 ± 151.727.0 ± 10.5
NOVO MESTO **
1952–202215.6 ± 1.04757.5 ± 146.31291.2 ± 193.81849.2 ± 218.516.0 ± 14.2
1961–199014.8 ± 0.61771.1 ± 127.41146.4 ± 109.21693.7 ± 112.87.3 ± 4.1
1991–202216.5 ± 0.88734.2 ± 160.31450.2 ± 161.42013.7 ± 215.125.4 ± 16.0
1991–200016.0 ± 0.77778.3 ± 135.41374.4 ± 127.21901.2 ± 154.615.5 ± 10.5
2001–201016.4 ± 0.50772.2 ± 156.81443.4 ± 122.81971.0 ± 171.122.9 ± 12.8
2011–202217.0 ± 0.51665.8 ± 207.71538.9 ± 90.02143.1 ± 181.535.8 ± 16.8
ČRNOMELJ **
1952–202216.3 ± 1.03802.6 ± 165.51419.6 ± 208.21984.6 ± 208.722.2 ± 13.9
1961–199015.6 ± 0.60793.9 ± 181.81279.0 ± 111.21834.5 ± 127.312.9 ± 7.2
1991–202217.1 ± 1.07789.5 ± 205.51579.5 ± 208.22137.8 ± 223.830.5 ± 15.5
1991–200016.5 ± 10.8816.6 ± 129.01467.3 ± 191.12003.5 ± 189.617.9 ± 11.9
2001–201017.1 ± 059781.9 ± 153.71581.1 ± 137.82133.7 ± 172.630.8 ± 11.8
2011–202217.7 ± 0.58773.3 ± 323.81696.1 ± 115.22253.3 ± 133.840.7 ± 11.1
BILJE ***
1952–202217.5 ± 0.93869.6 ± 209.01631.3 ± 190.82196.7 ± 187.831.0 ± 15.5
1961–199016.8 ± 0.66890.4 ± 194.81479.0 ± 133.92062.3 ± 121.022.0 ± 8.0
1991–202218.2 ± 0.98842.7 ± 218.01753.2 ± 199.02327.0 ± 200.941.2 ± 16.9
1991–200017.6 ± 0.601026.9 ± 220.21648.0 ± 116.22190.6 ± 123.329.6 ± 9.8
2001–201018.1 ± 0.47758.4 ± 219.41752.0 ± 116.02313.9 ± 162.338.6 ± 14.6
2011–202218.7 ± 0.64759.3 ± 195.51877.3 ± 126.32451.5 ± 118.353.1 ± 14.6
KOPER ***
1952–202218.6 ± 0.86612.7 ± 152.41854.6 ± 181.42227.4 ± 236.322.2 ± 20.7
1961–199018.3 ± 0.60653.8 ± 165.71794.1 ± 125.12068.3 ± 138.38.2 ± 7.9
1991–202218.9 ± 0.99573.5 ± 155.61904.7 ± 205.42399.6 ± 260.238.2 ± 23.3
1991–200018.2 ± 0.62598.8 ± 126.31774.5 ± 124.22225.7 ± 144.222.8 ± 13.7
2001–201018.6 ± 0.50574.7 ± 171.81854.1 ± 112.42343.1 ± 144.433.7 ± 14.8
2011–202219.9 ± 1.07551.4 ± 147.72115.1 ± 221.22591.7 ± 204.354.8 ± 19.1
GSTavg—average growing season temperature; GSP—total growing season precipitation; GDD—growing degree days (1 April to 31 October) °C units; HI—Huglin Index °C units; T > 30 °C—number of days with maximum temperature > 30 °C; and SD—Pearson’s standard deviation.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vršič, S.; Pulko, B.; Perko, A. Structure and Trends in Climate Parameters of Wine-Growing Regions in Slovenia. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 854. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10080854

AMA Style

Vršič S, Pulko B, Perko A. Structure and Trends in Climate Parameters of Wine-Growing Regions in Slovenia. Horticulturae. 2024; 10(8):854. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10080854

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vršič, Stanko, Borut Pulko, and Andrej Perko. 2024. "Structure and Trends in Climate Parameters of Wine-Growing Regions in Slovenia" Horticulturae 10, no. 8: 854. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10080854

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop