Next Article in Journal
Automated Tenderness Assessment of Okra Using Robotic Non-Destructive Sensing
Previous Article in Journal
The Polyamine Signaling Pathway in Response to Waterlogging Stress of Paeonia lactiflora
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Effects of Apical, Late-Season Leaf Removal on Vine Performance and Wine Properties in Sangiovese Grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.)

1
Department of Sustainable Crop Production (DiProVeS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29122 Piacenza, Italy
2
Department for Sustainable Food Process (DiSTAS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29122 Piacenza, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2024, 10(9), 929; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10090929
Submission received: 1 August 2024 / Revised: 27 August 2024 / Accepted: 28 August 2024 / Published: 30 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Topic Effects of Climate Change on Viticulture (Grape))

Abstract

An urgent challenge posed by climate change in warm grapevine-growing areas is accelerated ripening, which leads to rapid sugar accumulation while phenolics and aroma traits lag behind. Techniques that enable selectively delaying the sugar accumulation process without affecting the accumulation of secondary metabolites are essential. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of apical-to-cluster defoliation, manually applied in 2019 at the onset of veraison (D1) or 20 days later (D2), which removed about 30–40% of the pending total leaf area without altering the cluster microclimate compared with a non-defoliated control (C). Ripening trends, vegetative growth, yield components, and the final grape and wine composition, as well as wine sensorial attributes, were assessed. Although both treatments significantly lowered the final leaf area-to-yield ratio (0.80–0.90 m2/kg) compared with the 1.35 m2/kg recorded in the C vines, only D1 reduced the final total soluble solids (TSS) at harvest (2 °Brix less than C). However, the total anthocyanins were similarly limited, and titratable acidity (TA) did not differ from the C vines. The D1 wine was deemed similar to that made from control plants. Conversely, D2 failed to delay ripening, yet the D2 wine was deemed superior in terms of olfactory intensity, body, fruitiness, balance, and overall preference. Although the study was conducted over a single season, the results are robust enough to conclude that the timing of defoliation—i.e., the level of TSS concurrently reached by the C treatment—is crucial to achieving specific effects. Early defoliation appears valid for postponing ripening into a cooler period, making it quite interesting in warm–hot areas with a very long growing season; a much later defoliation, likely due to the interaction between mean canopy age and more light filtering from above the cluster zone, can elevate the quality of and appreciation for the final wine.
Keywords: summer pruning; berry ripening; canopy management; total soluble solids; sensorial analysis summer pruning; berry ripening; canopy management; total soluble solids; sensorial analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vercesi, A.; Gabrielli, M.; Garavani, A.; Poni, S. Effects of Apical, Late-Season Leaf Removal on Vine Performance and Wine Properties in Sangiovese Grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.). Horticulturae 2024, 10, 929. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10090929

AMA Style

Vercesi A, Gabrielli M, Garavani A, Poni S. Effects of Apical, Late-Season Leaf Removal on Vine Performance and Wine Properties in Sangiovese Grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.). Horticulturae. 2024; 10(9):929. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10090929

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vercesi, Alberto, Mario Gabrielli, Alessandra Garavani, and Stefano Poni. 2024. "Effects of Apical, Late-Season Leaf Removal on Vine Performance and Wine Properties in Sangiovese Grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.)" Horticulturae 10, no. 9: 929. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10090929

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop