Next Article in Journal
Can Edible Coatings Maintain Sweet Pepper Quality after Prolonged Storage at Sub-Optimal Temperatures?
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Different Biological and Organic Fertilizer Sources on the Quantitative and Qualitative Traits of Cephalaria syriaca
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Trichoderma asperellum on Chilling and Drought Stress in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bio-Chemical Fertilizer Improves the Oil Yield, Fatty Acid Compositions, and Macro-Nutrient Contents in Nigella sativa L.
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Horticulturae
Volume 7
Issue 10
10.3390/horticulturae7100386
horticulturae-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison between Fermentation and Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction: Which Is the Most Efficient Method to Obtain Antioxidant Polyphenols from Sambucus nigra and Punica granatum Fruits?

by
Luana Beatriz dos Santos Nascimento
1,
Antonella Gori
1,2,*,
Ilaria Degano
3,
Alessandro Mandoli
3,
Francesco Ferrini
1,2,4 and
Cecilia Brunetti
1,2
1
Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
2
Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection (IPSP), National Research Council of Italy, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
3
Chemical and Industrial Chemical Department, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
4
VALUE Laboratory on Green, Health & Wellbeing, University of Florence, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2021, 7(10), 386; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7100386
Submission received: 18 August 2021 / Revised: 29 September 2021 / Accepted: 30 September 2021 / Published: 9 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactivity, Phytochemical and Nutritional Composition of Natural Products)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Fruit extracts of Sambucus nigra L. (elderberry) and Punica granatum L. (pomegranate) have several applications in nutraceutical, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical industries thanks to their richness in antioxidant polyphenols, whose composition changes with the extraction method applied. We aimed to compare the efficiency of the fermentation extraction, recently applied by industries, with the ultrasound-assisted extraction–UAE, a well-known and efficient technique, on the yield of antioxidant polyphenols from elderberry fruits and pomegranate fruit-peels. Extracts were obtained by both methods, analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and the antioxidant capacities were evaluated using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging (HRS) assays. The main compounds detected in elderberry were caffeoyl and quercetin derivatives, present in higher amounts in UAE extracts. In pomegranate, punicalagin were the main constituents, also detected in higher contents in the UAE extracts compared to fermented ones. The UAE was more suitable for extracting anthocyanins from pomegranate. In addition, higher antioxidant capacities were observed in UAE extracts, possibly due to their richness in polyphenols. Therefore, despite the recent wide applicability and the good performance of the fermentation process, the UAE may be considered more efficient for the extraction of polyphenols from S. nigra and P. granatum fruits and may be used to obtain polyphenolic antioxidant extracts to be applied by several industries.

1. Introduction

Fruit is a rich source of bioactive compounds and has been explored for direct or indirect applications by food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries, to obtain several products [1,2]. Among the compounds present in this plant material, polyphenols have noticeable importance [3].
In plants, polyphenols play several protective and ecological roles, and, in fruit, they act especially as colorants and flavoring agents to attract seed dispersers [4]. Regarding their health-related properties, polyphenols are important for the prevention of chronic and degenerative diseases, particularly related to oxidative stress, including cardiovascular disorders, diabetes, and cancer [3,5]. Indeed, the high antioxidant potential of polyphenols undoubtedly explains their bioactivity [3,4]. Due also to their anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory and antiseptic actions, phenolic compounds are ideals preventive and healing agents [2,6]. Synthetic antioxidants are being replaced by natural polyphenolic-rich extracts in several products [7,8,9].
Berries and red fruits are some of the main sources of polyphenolic compounds used as cosmeceuticals [6,10] and have already shown multiple health benefits [11,12,13]. Among them, elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.) and pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) have remarkable commercial importance. Indeed, several products using elderberry and pomegranate extracts are currently available, and these fruits are among the main sources of polyphenols and colorants used by cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries [6,14].
Sambucus nigra L. (Adoxaceae) is a deciduous tree-like shrub widespread in Europe, especially in Mediterranean areas. Traditionally, the fruits of this species are used for the production of pies, jellies, jams, and beverages [15,16,17]. In addition, the fruit extracts have been applied as a diuretic and antiviral [14,17,18] and have been demonstrated anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic and immune-stimulating activities, some of them attributed to their high polyphenolic content [14,16]. Moreover, elderberry extracts have also shown high antioxidant capacity [14,16,19] and potential amelioration of UVB-induced skin photo-aging [20].
Punica granatum L. (Lythraceae) fruits are widely consumed around the world. Despite being native to Asia, pomegranate cultivation and consumption have been spread in the Mediterranean basin, including in Spain and Italy [21,22]. Extracts of pomegranate have shown anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer properties [23,24], which might be attributed to their well-known prominent antioxidant activity. In addition, pomegranate peel extracts have shown hypolipemic and hypoglycemic effects in humans with type 2 diabetes [25]. Moreover, pomegranate extracts are used as bioactive constituents in cosmetic products for the treatment of wrinkles and promotion of skin repair [6].
The main parts of pomegranate fruits are the peels (sum of the mesocarp, with white color, and exocarp, with orange-to-red color), and the seeds, these last covered by the juice-sacs [26]. All of these contain interesting bioactive molecules; however, the peels represent more than 40% of the fruit’s fresh weight and are rich in polyphenols, particularly in hydrolyzable tannins, even more than the pulp and the seeds [27]. Thus, some medicines have been currently produced using peels, a common waste material with large annual production [22,26].
The polyphenolic composition of an extract depends on the method of extraction [28]. Indeed, polyphenols are found in different plant cell structures and as insoluble forms through ester, ether, or glycosidic bonds, which turn their extraction a challenge [29]. Therefore, industries are constantly looking for more effective extraction processes to efficiently recover these bioactive compounds [6,29].
Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) is among the most efficient extraction processes for recovering polyphenols from fruit, vegetables, herbs, and spices [8]. It is considered a key technology based on the breakdown of the plant material by means of ultrasonic cavitation phenomena, being a simple, highly effective, and low-cost extraction technique [8,30]. UAE is widely applied in the pharmaceutical and cosmetic fields of the 21st century [31].
Fermentation, on the other hand, has been recently employed to extract polyphenols from several plant materials, standing out as a useful technology to produce novel cosmeceutical and pharmaceutical agents [32,33,34]. It involves enzyme-catalyzed reactions and induces the breakdown of the plant tissues, generally applying water as a solvent. Fermentation is based on the action of different ligninolytic and carbohydrate-metabolizing enzymes as well as microorganisms, which facilitate the extraction of polyphenols and other several compounds. The use of fermentation as an extraction method can increase the content of bioactive compounds, also by chemical changes of the original molecules, for example releasing free aglycones [32,33,34,35]. In particular, the application of S. cerevisiae is reported as capable to affect the hydrolysis of ellagitannins leading to a higher yield of these compounds in pomegranate husks [36]. In addition, this fermentation has been successfully applied to fruits containing anthocyanins [37,38]. Moreover, the combination of microbial fermentation with enzymatic treatment, in a simultaneous or sequentially way, has been recently applied to improve the content of polyphenols and the bioactivity of final products [39,40]. Due to its novelty and recently large application, the comparison between the efficiency of this extraction method with that of other techniques is of great importance, being barely found in the literature.
Although there are several reports regarding the polyphenolic composition of S. nigra and P. granatum fruit extracts, few of them compare the effects of different extraction methods in the yield of polyphenols and their antioxidant activity. Moreover, the comparison of the UAE, a well-known and efficient technique, largely applied for polyphenols extraction by industries, with fermented-assisted extraction, a recently employed method, has not been conducted yet. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficiency of the fermentation process (enzymatic treatment followed by incubation with S. cerevisiae) with that of UAE to achieve polyphenolic antioxidant extracts from the fruits of elderberry and pomegranate, two species largely applied by the cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fruit Material and Extraction Processes

Five three-years-old plants of Sambucus nigra L. and five plants of Punica granatum L., bought from a commercial nursery in Florence (Italy), were planted in pots filled with sandy soil (sand/peat, 60:40, v/v) and maintained in the greenhouse of the Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI)—University of Florence (UNIFI), Sesto Fiorentino (Florence, Italy, 43°49′ N, 11°37′ E). At the fully ripened stage, three fruits per plant of P. granatum and three fruit clusters (cones) of S. nigra were collected, in August 2019 and October 2019, respectively.
For S. nigra, completely mature berries (dark-violet colors) were removed from the stem, immediately frozen at −80 °C, and lyophilized. For P. granatum, immediately after harvesting, the peels (exocarp + mesocarp) were separated from the rest of the fruit (endocarp + seeds), frozen (at −80 °C) and lyophilized. Two types of extraction were conducted with the dry materials, namely fermentation and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE), according to the literature protocols [18,36,40,41].
For the enzymatic fermented extracts, 1 g of dry material was ground in liquid nitrogen, suspended in 15 mL of hot water (85 °C) for 15 min, treated with xylanase (1500 units), α-amylase (1000 units), and glucosidase (5.8 units) (all from Sigma–Aldrich®–Merck®KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), and fermented at room temperature (28 °C) for 24 h using Saccharomyces cerevisiae (0.5% w/v, Sigma–Aldrich®–Merck®KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). For the UAE-ethanolic extracts, the ground dry material (1 g) was extracted with 15 mL of ethanol 75% (pH 2.5 adjusted with formic acid–FA, both from Sigma–Aldrich®–Merck®KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) by ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) in ice-ultrasonic-bath (BioClass® CP104) using a constant frequency of 39 kHz and an input power of 100 W, for 30 min, at 5 °C. The lipophilic fraction was removed by liquid/liquid extraction with 15 mL n-hexane (Sigma–Aldrich®–Merck®KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), to avoid interferences in the following analyses. After the extraction, both fermented and UAE-ethanolic extracts were dried in rotavapor, weighted, and resuspended in methanol: water (1:1) acid solution (pH 2.5, adjusted with formic acid) to reach a final concentration of 10 mg mL−1. All the extractions were conducted in triplicate.

2.2. LC-ESI-Q-ToF Analysis: Identification of Polyphenols

After confirming by HPLC-DAD analysis that fermented and UAE extracts did not differ in terms of phenolic composition, but only in terms of concentration of the compounds, the fermented extracts were analyzed by LC-ESI-Q-ToF for more detailed identification of the different compounds.
For this analysis, the system consisted of an HPLC 1200 Infinity, coupled with a quadrupole-time of flight mass spectrometer Infinity Q-ToF 6530 detector by a Jet Stream ESI interface (Agilent Technologies). The ESI conditions were drying and sheath gas N2, purity > 98%, temperature 350 °C, flow 10 L min−1 and temperature 375 °C, flow 11 L min−1, respectively; capillary voltage 4.5 KV; nebulizer gas pressure 35 psi. The fragmentor voltage was 175 V; nozzle, skimmer, and octapole RF voltages were set at 1000 V, 65 V, and 750 V, respectively. The high-resolution MS and MS/MS acquisition range was set from 100 to 1000 m/z in both positive and negative mode, with an acquisition rate of 1.04 spectra/s. For the MS/MS experiments, 30 V were applied in the collision cell to obtain CID fragmentation (collision gas N2, purity 99.999%). The FWHM (full width half maximum) of quadrupole mass bandpass used during MS/MS precursor isolation was 4 m/z. The Agilent tuning mix HP0321 was used daily to calibrate the mass axis.
The chromatographic separation was performed on an analytical reversed-phase column Poroshell 120 EC-C18 (3.0 × 75 mm, particle size 2.7 μm) with a Zorbax® pre-column (4.6 × 12.5 mm, particle size 5 μm), both by Agilent Technologies. The eluents used were water (A) and acetonitrile (B), both LC-MS grade (Sigma–Aldrich®–Merck®KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), and added with 0.1% v/v FA (98% purity, J.T. Baker®, Milan, Italy).
Aliquots of the fermented extracts of both species (5 μL, 10 mg mL−1) were analyzed using a flow rate of 0.4 mL min−1 and the program was: 15% B (0.1% FA in ACN) for 2.6 min, then to 50% B in 13.0 min, to 70% B in 5.2 min, to 100% B in 0.5 min and then held for 6.7 min, with are-equilibration of 11 min. During the separation, the column was kept at 30 °C. The identification of the polyphenols present in the different extracts was conducted based on the exact mass and tandem mass spectra obtained by the ESI-Q-ToF detector, by comparison with reference compounds (quercetin, kaempferol, caffeic, chlorogenic, gallic and ellagic acids, catechin and punicalagin, all from Sigma–Aldrich®–Merck®KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and literature data.

2.3. HPLC-DAD Analysis: Quantification of Polyphenols

To quantify the different classes of polyphenols (hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives, flavonoids, and anthocyanins), aliquots of all the extracts (5 μL, 10 mg mL−1) were injected into a Perkin® Elmer Flexar liquid chromatograph equipped with a quaternary 200 Q/410 pump and an LC 200 diode array detector (DAD) (all from Perkin Elmer®, Bradford®, CT, USA). The stationary phase consisted of an Agilent®Zorbax® SR-18 (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) column kept at 30 °C. The eluents were (A) acidified water (pH 2.5, 0.1% FA) and (B) acetonitrile (pH 2.5, 0.1% FA). A gradient solvent system from 98% of A to 98% of B, over a 44-min run and a flow rate of 0.6 mL min−1 was applied: 0–2 min (2% B), 2–37 min (2–98% B), 37–42 min (98% B), 42–44 min (98–2% B). The chromatograms were acquired at 280 nm and 350 nm.
For anthocyanins quantification, a Luna Omega® Phenomenex® C18 (100 × 2.1 mm, 3 μm) column was used. The same solvents were used at the same gradient, but with a flow rate of 0.4 mL min−1. The chromatograms were acquired at 520 nm.
Different standards (punicalagin, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, quercetin, kaempferol, ellagic acid, and cyanin, all from Sigma–Aldrich®–Merck®KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) were injected to generate five-point calibration curves (0.025–0.5 mg mL−1) used to quantify the diverse phenolic classes of the compounds detected in the extracts. All constituents were quantified using these standards by the external standard method and the molecular weight correction factors were used when necessary. The linearity of the curves was determined by the coefficient of determination (R2), being higher than 0.99 for all the standards. The results were given in milligrams to grams of dry weight (mg g−1 DW).
The content of different classes of polyphenols in S. nigra was given in total amounts of the main phenolic classes detected: total flavonoids (TFC), total hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives (THC), total anthocyanins (TAC), and total polyphenols content (TPC), all as the sum of the individual compounds belonging to each class and quantified with each specific standard. For P. granatum, the amount of the major compounds (punicalagin alpha and beta), anthocyanins (TAC), and polyphenols (TPC) were determined.

2.4. Antioxidant Capacity Assays

The antioxidant capacity assay was performed using two different methods: DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) assay and the Hydroxyl Radical (OH)-Scavenging (HRS) assay.
The DPPH assay was performed according to the method described by Kandi and Charles [42]. Briefly, diluted samples of the extracts (0.5 mL) were added to 0.5 mL of DPPH solution (0.1 mM in methanol; Sigma–Aldrich®–Merck®KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and the mixture was kept reacting at room temperature for 45 min in the dark. After this time, the absorbance was spectrophotometrically measured at 518 nm, using a Perkin Elmer® UV/Vis spectrophotometer (Lambda 25). Aliquots of the extracts without the addition of the DPPH solution (0.5 mL methanol and 0.5 mL extracts) were used as blanks, and the DPPH solution was used as negative control (0.5 mL methanol and 0.5 mL DPPH solution). The analyses were conducted in triplicate and the percentage of antioxidant activity was calculated as follow (Equation (1)):
AA% = 100 − {[(ABSsample− ABSblank) × 100]/ABSnegative control}
The Hydroxyl Radical-Scavenging (HRS) assay was performed as described in Gori et al. [43]. Different concentrations of the extracts were allowed to react with FeSO4 (1.5 mM), hydrogen peroxide (6 mM), and sodium salicylate (20 mM), all from Sigma–Aldrich®(Merck®KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), at 37 °C for 1 h. Afterward, the absorbance was measured at 562 nm.
The EC50 (effective concentration at 50%) values were calculated with Microsoft Excel® software.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The content of polyphenols and the antioxidant capacities (EC50 values) of the extracts were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 3). A Student’s t-test (factor: extraction method) was used to compare the results. All the statistical analyses were performed using SigmaPlot® Systat® software (version 12.5, SystatSoftware, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) and the differences were considered significant when p ≤ 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Polyphenolic and Anthocyanic Content in Fermented and UAE-Ethanolic Extracts

The main polyphenols detected in extracts of S. nigra fruits were hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives (especially caffeoylquinic and caffeic acids) and quercetin glycosides (flavonols) (Supplementary Figure S1, Table 1). These compounds were identified based on the HPLC-ESI-Q-ToF analysis, by comparison with reference compounds and literature data, as follows: neochlorogenic acid (peak 1), dihydroxybenzoic acid (peak 2), cryptochlorogenic acid (peak 3), chlorogenic acid (peak 4), caffeic acid (peak 5), quercetin-3-O-rutinoside (peak 6), quercetin-3-O-glucoside (peak 7), kaempferol-O-rutinoside (peak 8) and quercetin (peak 9) (Supplementary Figure S1, Table 1). The most abundant class of compounds in both extracts (Table 2) were flavonoids, among which rutin (peak 6) was the main constituent (Supplementary Figure S1).
Regarding the amount of the different classes of polyphenols in both extract types, the UAE extracts resulted to be richer especially in THC (p < 0.001), being around three times higher than that content found in fermented extracts. The UAE was also more efficient in extracting flavonoids (TFC was around double higher, p = 0.02) and total polyphenols (TPC, p = 0.03) (Table 2). In contrast, anthocyanins (TAC) showed higher concentrations in fermented extracts compared to UAE (p ≤ 0.01, Table 2). Indeed, the content of anthocyanins in fermented extracts is almost the same as flavonoids in these extracts (Table 2).
The polyphenolic composition of the extracts of P. granatum fruit-peels revealed the presence of punicalagin alpha (peak 3) and beta (peak 6) as the major constituents (Supplementary Figure S2, Table 3), both extracted in higher amounts by UAE–around 2 to 3 times more (Table 4, p ≤ 0.001). Further, less abundant peaks, correspondent to ellagitannins (peak 1-punicalin, and peaks 9–12) and ellagic acid (peak 13), were also identified, together with some simple phenolic acids (gallic and hydroxybenzoic acids, peaks 2 and 4, respectively), digalloyl glucose (peak 5) and catechins (peaks 7 and 8) (Supplementary Figure S2, Table 3). Moreover, anthocyanins were detected only in UAE-ethanolic extracts of P. granatum fruit peels (TAC, Table 4).

3.2. Antioxidant Capacity of the Extracts

The fruit extracts exhibited different antioxidant capacities depending on the extraction process applied (Table 5). For both species, the UAE-ethanolic extracts showed higher antioxidant activity (lower EC50 values) than the fermented ones (p < 0.01), regardless of the antioxidant method applied (DPPH or HRS). The UAE extracts showed to be around 2 to 5 times more effective as antioxidants than those obtained by fermentation. Moreover, P. granatum fruit-peel extracts exhibited the highest antioxidant potential (very low EC50 values), showing to be more than 100 times more antioxidants than the correspondent extracts of S. nigra.

4. Discussion

The content of polyphenols and the antioxidant capacity of the extracts obtained by fermentation and by UAE showed to be different, suggesting a higher efficiency of the UAE process compared to fermentation for both studied fruits. Indeed, an extraction process can be considered efficient if it allows obtaining a high content of the compounds of interest, also considering the principle of the Green Extraction, such as the amount and the type of solvent and the general procedure costs [44]. In particular, higher extraction efficiency decreases the time used during the process and increases the extraction yield [31]. Therefore, the UAE method applied here showed to be more effective, since used less time and temperature, and resulted in extracts with higher yields of polyphenols and antioxidant capacity, compared to those from the fermented-assisted extraction employed in this study. Based on the recent literature, this result was not predictable since the conversion of glucosides into their aglycones by fermentation may result in a higher antioxidant activity of these extracts and the fermentation of Punica granatum wastes utilizing S. cerevisiae may improve the extraction of ellagic acid derivatives [36]. In addition, the antioxidant activity of extracts obtained by fermentation cannot be hypothesized based on its TPC, since synergism between polyphenols and other components, sometimes deriving from the fermentation process, has been documented [45,46].
In agreement with our findings, flavonol glycosides (mainly quercetin-3-O-rutinoside and quercetin-3-O-glucoside) and hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives have been described as major components in elderberry fruits [14,18]. Additionally, similarly to our results, rutin has been previously identified as the most abundant phenolic compound in elderberry extracts [47,48]. Caffeoylquinic acid derivatives and flavonols are used for the treatment of metabolic syndromes, being potential agents in the management of lipid metabolism and against obesity [49]. In addition, chlorogenic acid derivatives have shown antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and antiviral properties [50,51], being important for cosmetic and pharmaceutical applications [52]. Moreover, quercetin derivatives are also important bioactive molecules, acting as antibacterial and antiviral [53], besides being important antioxidants. These flavonoids have also shown an anti-melanogenesis effect [54]. Both quercetin and hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives showed higher content in the UAE extracts than in those resulted from fermentation. This could be due to the duration of the fermentation process (24 h). Indeed, in a previous study using Aspergillus niger, the total amounts of polyphenols in S. nigra extracts were higher only if the fermentation time was longer than 24 h [55].
Regarding the anthocyanins, they were detected in higher amounts in fermented extracts of elderberry than in UAE ones. Previous reports showed that cyanidin-3-sambubioside-5-glucoside, cyanidin-3,5-diglucoside, cyanidin-3-glucoside, and cyanidin-3-sambubioside were the main anthocyanins found in extracts of S. nigra fruits [15]. The greater content in total anthocyanins exhibited by the fermented extracts might contribute to their potential use as natural colorants, also with therapeutic effects [56].
Pomegranate peels are important sources of phenolic acids and hydrolyzable tannins [22,57], with punicalagin alpha and beta as the most abundant compounds [21,57,58]. In agreement with our results, Aguilar et al. [59] showed that the fermentation step decreased around six times the content of hydrolyzable tannins in P. granatum peels when compared to their content in fresh materials. Additionally, fermentation has already been shown to degraded punicalagin during the extraction of pomegranate [60].
The higher content of punicalagin in UAE ethanolic extracts observed here is an important result since punicalagin are the main compounds responsible for the in vitro and in vivo biological activity of pomegranate [61,62]. In addition, punicalagin point out as antioxidant molecules [27]. Therefore, the noticeable antioxidant capacity of the pomegranate fruit-peels extracts obtained by UAE in our study might be attributed to their richness in punicalagin. They also act in synergism with other compounds present in these extracts [58].
Although anthocyanins have already been described in peels of P. granatum [57], we did not detect these compounds in fermented extracts. These findings agree with the previous observation that the content of anthocyanins showed a significant decrease in pomegranate wine after fermentation [63].
The fermentation is known as a process that enhances the content of polyphenols in the extracts since the fermentation enzymes (e.g., amylases and xylanases) can release bound and non-soluble phenolics found in the wall matrix of the plant cells. In addition, the recent combination of an enzymatic pretreatment with microbial fermentation has been employed for the extraction of plant materials, including fruit peels, generating rich-polyphenolic products [64,65]. As such, this is a new extraction method that is being applied by several industries [33,35,66]. However, this method might also induce structural changes in polyphenols, increasing the rate of phenolics losses, and affecting their biological activities [33,35,66]. For instance, studies applying fermentation showed that oxidative degradation of polyphenols might occur, resulting in a low content of these compounds and weaker antioxidant capacity of the final extracts [35]. Thus, different extraction factors applied during the fermentation process (e.g., temperature, time, pH, and microorganism) should be carefully chosen and even optimized to generate extracts richer in polyphenols and avoiding hydrolysis and/or oxidation reactions of these bioactive compounds [35].
In conclusion, in our investigation, using the fruit of S. nigra and P. granatum, the ultrasound-assisted method showed to be more efficient than the fermentation process here tested to obtain extracts richer in polyphenols and with a greater antioxidant capacity. Indeed, although being more efficacious for the extraction of anthocyanins from elderberry fruits, the fermented-assisted method is a long process and might result in losses of bioactive compounds. These aspects, combined with the vast application, consolidation and robustness of the UAE method in different industries, as well as its ease-to-use and low cost, indicate that UAE could be a very promising method for both types of fruits to generate extracts with high polyphenolic content. Further studies, focused on the optimization of the parameters of both efficacious methods might be conducted, to develop new protocols more suitable and profitable for industrial applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/horticulturae7100386/s1, Figure S1: HPLC-ESI-Q-ToF analysis of fermented extracts of fruits of elderberry (S. nigra). Extracted Ion Chromatograms relative to the species listed in Table 1 (negative ionization mode). Figure S2: HPLC-ESI-Q-ToF analysis of fermented extracts of fruit-peels of pomegranate (P. granatum). Extracted Ion Chromatograms relative to the species listed in Table 3 (negative ionization mode).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.G. and C.B.; methodology, A.G., C.B.; software, L.B.d.S.N., I.D., A.M.; formal analysis, L.B.d.S.N., I.D., A.M.; investigation, L.B.d.S.N., I.D., A.M.; resources, A.G., C.B., F.F.; data curation, L.B.d.S.N., I.D., A.M., A.G., C.B.; writing—original draft preparation, L.B.d.S.N.; writing—review and editing, A.G., C.B.; supervision, C.B., F.F.; funding acquisition, C.B., F.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received external funding from DAVINES SPA to carry out the research project “Attività di ricerca e svilupposufitocomplessiestratti da tessutivegetali per utilizzocosmetico”. This work was further supported by the CNR project NUTR-AGE (FOE-2019, DSB.AD004.271).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Martin, K.R.; Appel, C.L. Polyphenols as dietary supplements: A double-edged sword. Nut. Diet. Sup. 2009, 2, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Faria-Silva, C.; Ascenso, A.; Costa, A.M.; Marto, J.; Carvalheiro, M.; Ribeiro, H.M.; Simões, S. Feeding the skin: A new trend in food and cosmetics convergence. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 95, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Calderón-Oliver, M.; Ponce-Alquicira, E. Fruits: A source of polyphenols and health benefits. In Natural and Artificial Flavoring Agents and Food Dyes, 1st ed.; Grumezescu, A., Holban, A.M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; Volume 7, pp. 189–228. [Google Scholar]
  4. Khoddami, A.; Wilkes, M.A.; Roberts, T.H. Techniques for analysis of plant phenolic compounds. Molecules 2013, 18, 2328–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Piccolella, S.; Crescente, G.; Candela, L.; Pacifico, S. Nutraceutical polyphenols: New analytical challenges and opportunities. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2019, 175, 112774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Galanakis, C. Polyphenols: Properties, Recovery, and Applications; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2018; p. 456. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sun-Waterhouse, D. The development of fruit-based functional foods targeting the health and wellness market: A review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 46, 899–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chemat, F.; Rombaut, N.; Sicaire, A.G.; Meullemiestre, A.; Fabiano-Tixier, A.S.; Abert-Vian, M. Ultrasound assisted extraction of food and natural products. Mechanisms, techniques, combinations, protocols and applications. A review. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2017, 34, 540–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Thitipramote, N.; Maisakun, T.; Chomchuen, C.; Pradmeeteekul, P.; Nimkamnerd, J.; Vongnititorn, P.; Chaiwut, P.; Thitilertdecha, N.; Pintathong, P. Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activities from pomegranate peel and seed extracts. Food App. Biosci. J. 2019, 7, 152–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hidalgo, G.I.; Almajano, M.P. Red fruits: Extraction of antioxidants, phenolic content and radical scavenging determination: A review. Antioxidants 2017, 6, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lin, J.Y.; Tang, C.Y. Determination of total phenolic and flavonoid contents in selected fruits and vegetables, as well as their stimulatory effects on mouse splenocyte proliferation. Food Chem. 2007, 101, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nile, S.H.; Park, S.W. Edible berries: Bioactive components and their effect on human health. Nutrition 2014, 30, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zarfeshany, A.; Asgary, S.; Javanmard, S.H. Potent health effects of pomegranate. Adv. Biomed. Res. 2014, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Młynarczyk, K.; Walkowiak-Tomczak, D.; Łysiak, G.P. Bioactive properties of Sambucus nigra L. as a functional ingredient for food and pharmaceutical industry. J. Func. Foods 2018, 40, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Veberic, R.; Jakopic, J.; Stampar, F.; Schmitzer, V. European elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.) rich in sugars, organic acids, anthocyanins and selected polyphenols. Food Chem. 2009, 114, 511–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Silva, P.; Ferreira, S.; Nunes, F.M. Elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.) by-products a source of anthocyanins and antioxidant polyphenols. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 95, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ferreira, S.S.; Silva, A.M.; Nunes, F.M. Sambucus nigra L. fruits and flowers: Chemical composition and related bioactivities. Food Rev. Int. 2020, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Oniszczuk, A.; Olech, M.; Oniszczuk, T.; Wojtunik-Kulesza, K.; Wójtowicz, A. Extraction methods, LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis of phenolic compounds and antiradical properties of functional food enriched with elderberry flowers or fruits. Arabian J. Chem. 2019, 12, 4719–4730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Dawidowicz, A.L.; Wianowska, D.; Baraniak, B. The antioxidant properties of alcoholic extracts from Sambucus nigra L. (antioxidant properties of extracts). LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2006, 39, 308–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lin, P.; Hwang, E.; Ngo, H.T.; Seo, S.A.; Yi, T.H. Sambucus nigra L. ameliorates UVB-induced photoaging and inflammatory response in human skin keratinocytes. Cytotechnology 2019, 71, 1003–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Middha, S.K.; Usha, T.; Pande, V. HPLC evaluation of phenolic profile, nutritive content, and antioxidant capacity of extracts obtained from Punica granatum fruit peel. Adv. Pharmacol. Sci. 2013, 296236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Venkitasamy, C.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, R.; Pan, Z. Pomegranate. InIntegrated Processing Technologies for Food and Agricultural By-Products; Pan, Z., Zhang, R., Zicari, S., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 181–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sohrab, G.; Nasrollahzadeh, J.; Zand, H.; Amiri, Z.; Tohidi, M.; Kimiagar, M. Effects of pomegranate juice consumption on inflammatory markers in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2014, 19, 215–220. [Google Scholar]
  24. Orgil, O.; Schwartz, E.; Baruch, L.; Matityahu, I.; Mahajna, J.; Amir, R. The antioxidative and anti-proliferative potential of non-edible organs of the pomegranate fruit and tree. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 58, 571–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Grabež, M.; Škrbić, R.; Stojiljković, M.P.; Rudić-Grujić, V.; Paunović, M.; Arsić, A.; Petrović, S.; Vučić, V.; Mirjanić-Azarić, B.; Šavikin, K.; et al. Beneficial effects of pomegranate peel extract on plasma lipid profile, fatty acids levels and blood pressure in patients with diabetes mellitus type-2: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J. Func. Foods 2020, 64, 103692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Karimi, M.; Sadeghi, R.; Kokini, J. Pomegranate as a promising opportunity in medicine and nanotechnology. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 2017, 69, 59–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Derakhshan, Z.; Ferrante, M.; Tadi, M.; Ansari, F.; Heydari, A.; Hosseini, M.S.; Conti, G.O.; Sadrabad, E.K. Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of ethanolic extract of pomegranate peels, juice and seeds. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 114, 108–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Braga, M.E.M.; Seabra, I.J.; Ama, D.; De Sousa, H.C. Recent trends and perspectives for the extraction of natural products. In Natural Product Extraction: Principles and Applications; Rostagno, M.A., Prado, J.M., Eds.; RSC Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2013; pp. 231–275. [Google Scholar]
  29. Dey, T.B.; Chakraborty, S.; Jain, K.K.; Sharma, A.; Kuhad, R.C. Antioxidant phenolics and their microbial production by submerged and solid state fermentation process: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 60–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wen, C.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, H. Advances in ultrasound assisted extraction of bioactive compounds from cash crops—A review. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2018, 48, 538–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rostagno, M.A.; Prado, J.M. (Eds.) Natural Product Extraction: Principles and Applications(No. 21); Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hussain, A.; Bose, S.; Wang, J.H.; Yadav, M.K.; Mahajan, G.B.; Kim, H. Fermentation, a feasible strategy for enhancing bioactivity of herbal medicines. Food Res. Int. 2016, 81, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chouhan, S.; Sharma, K.; Guleria, S. Augmenting bioactivity of plant-based foods using fermentation. In A Handbook on High Value Fermentation Products; Saran, S., Babu, V., Chaubey, A., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; Volume 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dias, R.; Oliveira, H.; Fernandes, I.; SimaL-Gandara, J.; Perez-Gregorio, R. Recent advances in extracting phenolic compounds from food and their use in disease prevention and as cosmetics. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hur, S.J.; Lee, S.Y.; Kim, Y.C.; Choi, I.; Kim, G.B. Effect of fermentation on the antioxidant activity in plant-based foods. Food Chem. 2014, 160, 346–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Moccia, F.; Flores-Gallegos, A.C.; Chávez-González, M.L.; Sepúlveda, L.; Marzorati, S.; Verotta, L.; Panzella, L.; Ascacio-Valdes, J.A.; Aguilar, C.N.; Napolitano, A. Ellagic acid recovery by solid state fermentation of pomegranate wastes by Aspergillus niger and Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A comparison. Molecules 2019, 24, 3689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Pérez-Gregorio, M.R.; Regueiro, J.; Alonso-González, E.; Pastrana-Castro, L.M.; Simal-Gándara, J. Influence of alcoholic fermentation process on antioxidant activity and phenolic levels from mulberries (Morus nigra L.). LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 1793–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Johnson, M.H.; Lucius, A.; Meyer, T.; Gonzalez de Mejia, E. Cultivar evaluation and effect of fermentation on antioxidant capacity and In Vitro inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase by highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corombosum). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 8923–8930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, L.; Luo, Y.; Wu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wu, Z. Fermentation and complex enzyme hydrolysis for improving the total soluble phenolic contents, flavonoid aglycones contents and bio-activities of guava leaves tea. Food Chem. 2018, 264, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Milić, M.D.; Buntić, A.V.; Mihajlovski, K.R.; Ilić, N.V.; Davidović, S.Z.; Dimitrijević-Branković, S.I. The development of a combined enzymatic and microbial fermentation as a viable technology for the spent coffee ground full utilization. Biomass Convers. Bioref. 2021, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Živković, J.; Šavikin, K.; Janković, T.; Ćujić, N.; Menković, N. Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of polyphenolic compounds from pomegranate peel using response surface methodology. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 194, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kandi, S.; Charles, A.L. Statistical comparative study between the conventional DPPH spectrophotometric and dropping DPPH analytical method without spectrophotometer: Evaluation for the advancement of antioxidant activity analysis. Food Chem. 2019, 287, 338–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Gori, A.; Ferrini, F.; Marzano, M.C.; Tattini, M.; Centritto, M.; Baratto, M.C.; Pogni, R.; Brunetti, C. Characterization and antioxidant activity of crude extract and polyphenolic rich fractions from C. incanus leaves. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chemat, F.; Vian, M.A.; Cravotto, G. Green extraction of natural products: Concept and principles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 8615–8627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Naczk, M.; Shahidi, F. Phenolics in cereals, fruits and vegetables: Occurrence, extraction and analysis. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2006, 41, 1523–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kim, Y.; Goodner, K.L.; Park, J.D.; Choi, J.; Talcott, S.T. Changes in antioxidant phytochemicals and volatile composition of Camellia sinensis by oxidation during tea fermentation. Food Chem. 2011, 129, 1331–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Thomas, A.L.; Byers, P.L.; Gu, S.; Avery, J.D., Jr.; Kaps, M.; Datta, A.; Fernando, L.; Grossi, P.; Rottinghaus, G.E. Occurrence of polyphenols, organic acids, and sugars among diverse elderberry genotypes grown in three Missouri (USA) locations. Acta Horticult. 2015, 1061, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Domínguez, R.; Zhang, L.; Rocchetti, G.; Lucini, L.; Pateiro, M.; Munekata, P.E.; Lorenzo, J.M. Elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.) as potential source of antioxidants. Characterization, optimization of extraction parameters and bioactive properties. Food Chem. 2020, 330, 127266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Alam, M.A.; Subhan, N.; Hossain, H.; Hossain, M.; Reza, H.M.; Rahman, M.M.; Ullah, M.O. Hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives: A potential class of natural compounds for the management of lipid metabolism and obesity. Nutr. Metab. 2016, 13, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Abramovič, H. Antioxidant properties of hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives: A focus on biochemistry, physicochemical parameters, reactive species, and biomolecular interactions. In Coffee in Health and Disease Prevention; Preedy, V.R., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; pp. 843–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Taofiq, O.; González-Paramás, A.M.; Barreiro, M.F.; Ferreira, I.C. Hydroxycinnamic acids and their derivatives: Cosmeceutical significance, challenges and future perspectives, a review. Molecules 2017, 22, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Miao, M.; Xiang, L. Pharmacological action and potential targets of chlorogenic acid. Adv. Pharmacol. 2020, 87, 71–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. David, A.V.A.; Arulmoli, R.; Parasuraman, S. Overviews of biological importance of quercetin: A bioactive flavonoid. Pharmacog. Rev. 2016, 10, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Choi, M.H.; Shin, H.J. Anti-melanogenesis effect of quercetin. Cosmetics 2016, 3, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Dulf, F.V.; Vodnar, D.C.; Dulf, E.H.; Tosa, M.I. Total phenolic contents, antioxidant activities, and lipid fractions from berry pomaces obtained by solid-state fermentation of two Sambucus species with Aspergillus niger. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 3489–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Stintzing, F.C.; Stintzing, A.S.; Carle, R.; Frei, B.; Wrolstad, R.E. Color and antioxidant properties of cyanidin-based anthocyanin pigments. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 6172–6181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Fischer, U.A.; Carle, R.; Kammerer, D.R. Identification and quantification of phenolic compounds from pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peel, mesocarp, aril and differently produced juices by HPLC-DAD–ESI/MSn. Food Chem. 2011, 127, 807–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Machado, A.P.D.F.; Sumere, B.R.; Mekaru, C.; Martinez, J.; Bezerra, R.M.N.; Rostagno, M.A. Extraction of polyphenols and antioxidants from pomegranate peel using ultrasound: Influence of temperature, frequency and operation mode. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 2792–2801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Aguilar, C.N.; Aguilera-Carbo, A.; Robledo, A.; Ventura, J.; Belmares, R.; Martinez, D.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R.; Contreras, J. Production of antioxidant nutraceuticals by solid-state cultures of pomegranate (Punica granatum) peel and creosote bush (Larrea tridentata) leaves. Food Technol. Biotech. 2008, 46, 218–222. [Google Scholar]
  60. Ascacio-Valdés, J.A.; Aguilera-Carbó, A.F.; Buenrostro, J.J.; Prado-Barragán, A.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R.; Aguilar, C.N. The complete biodegradation pathway of ellagitannins by Aspergillus niger in solid-state fermentation. J. Basic Microbiol. 2016, 56, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Masci, A.; Coccia, A.; Lendaro, E.; Mosca, L.; Paolicelli, P.; Cesa, S. Evaluation of different extraction methods from pomegranate whole fruit or peels and the antioxidant and antiproliferative activity of the polyphenolic fraction. Food Chem. 2016, 202, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lee, C.J.; Chen, L.G.; Liang, W.L.; Hsieh, M.S.; Wang, C.C. Inhibitory effects of punicalagin from Punica granatum against type II collagenase-induced osteoarthritis. J. Funct. Foods 2018, 41, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lan, Y.; Wu, J.; Wang, X.; Sun, X.; Hackman, R.M.; LI, Z.; Feng, X. Evaluation of antioxidant capacity and flavor profile change of pomegranate wine during fermentation and aging process. Food Chem. 2017, 232, 777–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Bei, Q.; Chen, G.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Z. Improving phenolic compositions and bioactivity of oats by enzymatic hydrolysis and microbial fermentation. J. Funct. Foods 2018, 47, 512–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lee, J.; Lee, J.; Kim, M.; Kim, J.H. Fermented extraction of Citrus unshiu peel inhibits viability and migration of human pancreatic cancers. J. Med. Food 2018, 21, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Verduzco-Oliva, R.; Gutierrez-Uribe, J.A. Beyond enzyme production: Solid state fermentation (SSF) as an alternative approach to produce antioxidant polysaccharides. Sustainability 2010, 12, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table
Table 1. Peaks detected in extracts of fruits of S. nigra by HPLC-ESI-Q-ToF analysis (peak numbers are referred to the chromatograms presented in Supplementary Figure S1).
Table 1. Peaks detected in extracts of fruits of S. nigra by HPLC-ESI-Q-ToF analysis (peak numbers are referred to the chromatograms presented in Supplementary Figure S1).
PeakTr (min)Raw FormulaMolecular ion [M-H]− (m/z)MS/MS FragmentsPeak Assignment
11.9C16H18O9353.0893191.0561, 179.0342, 135.0461Neochlorogenic acid
(5-O-caffeoylquinic acid)
22.1C7H6O4153.1235109.0421Dihydroxybenzoic acid
32.4C16H18O9353.0895191.0572, 173.0451, 127.0410Cryptochlorogenic acid (4-O-caffeoylquinic acid)
43.4C16H18O9353.0884191.0566Chlorogenic acid (3-O-caffeoylquinic acid)
53.7C9H8O4179.0354135.0461Caffeic acid
67.9C27H30O16609.1484300.0281, 151.0021Quercetin-3-O-rutinoside (rutin)
78.6C21H20O12463.0894300.0278, 271.0258, 151.0035Quercetin-3-O-glucoside
89.4C27H30O15593.1534285.0413Kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside
913.1C15H10O7301.0367151.0040, 121.0293, 107.0139Quercetin
Table
Table 2. Content of polyphenols (in mg g−1 DW) in UAE-ethanolic and fermented extracts of elderberry (S. nigra) fruits. TFC—total flavonoid content; THC—total hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives content; TAC—total anthocyanins content; TPC—total polyphenols content.
Table 2. Content of polyphenols (in mg g−1 DW) in UAE-ethanolic and fermented extracts of elderberry (S. nigra) fruits. TFC—total flavonoid content; THC—total hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives content; TAC—total anthocyanins content; TPC—total polyphenols content.
S. nigraTFCTHCTACTPC
UAE-ethanolic extracts2.95 ± 0.5 *0.70 ± 0.08 ***0.311 ± 0.053.96 ± 0.4 *
Fermented extracts1.66 ± 0.250.22 ± 0.021.23 ± 0.32 **3.11 ± 0.2
Results are given in mean ± SD (n = 3). Asterisks indicate significant differences between the content of the same compound class in different extracts (UAE vs. fermented), according to the student t-test: * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001.
Table
Table 3. Peaks detected in the extracts of fruit peels of P. granatum by HPLC-ESI-Q-ToF analysis (peak numbers are referred to the chromatograms presented in Supplementary Figure S2).
Table 3. Peaks detected in the extracts of fruit peels of P. granatum by HPLC-ESI-Q-ToF analysis (peak numbers are referred to the chromatograms presented in Supplementary Figure S2).
PeakTr (min)Raw FormulaMolecular Ion [M-H]− (m/z)MS/MS FragmentsPeak Assignment
11.46C34H22O22781.0564600.9905, 450.9872, 301.0082Punicalin
21.56C7H6O5169.0142n.d.Gallic acid
31.71C48H28O301083.0594n.d.Punicalagin alpha
41.75C7H6O3139.0384n.d.4-hydroxybenzoic acid
51.86C20H20O14483.0874331.0724, 313.0621, 271.0523, 169.0061, 125.0252Digalloyl-glucose
61.96C48H28O301083.0597781.0507, 600.9883, 300.9992Punicalagin beta
72.05C15H14O7305.0495137.0233, 125.0187, 109.0478(Epi)gallocatechin
82.65C15H14O6289.0722151.0119, 137.0278, 125.0178, 109.0235Catechin
93.30C20H16O13463.0525300.9991Ellagic acid-O-hexoside
107.20C20O16O12447.0568299.9915Ellagic acid-O-rhamnoside
117.30C19H14O12433.0419299.9928Ellagic acid-O-pentoside
127.91C14H6O8300.9998283.9960, 229.0127Ellagic acid
139.80C21H20O11463.0894300.0278, 271.0258, 151.0035Quercetin-3-O-glucoside
n.d.: not detected.
Table
Table 4. Content of punicalagin alpha and beta, total anthocyanins content (TAC), and total polyphenol content (TPC) (in mg g−1 DW) in UAE-ethanolic and fermented extracts of pomegranate peels (P. granatum).
Table 4. Content of punicalagin alpha and beta, total anthocyanins content (TAC), and total polyphenol content (TPC) (in mg g−1 DW) in UAE-ethanolic and fermented extracts of pomegranate peels (P. granatum).
P. granatumPunicalagin AlphaPunicalagin BetaTACTPC
UAE-ethanolic extracts1.04 ± 0.09 ***1.30 ± 0.15 ***0.52 ± 0.07 ***2.86 ± 0.34 ***
Fermented extracts0.43 ± 0.030.53 ± 0.06n.d.0.96 ± 0.10
Results are given in mean ± SD (n = 3). Asterisks indicate significant differences between the content of the same compound class in different extracts (UAE vs. fermented), according to t-student test: *** p ≤ 0.001, n.d.: not detected.
Table
Table 5. Antioxidant capacity (in terms of EC50, mg mL−1) of UAE-ethanolic and fermented extracts of S. nigra fruits (elderberry) and P. granatum fruit-peels (pomegranate) extracts.
Table 5. Antioxidant capacity (in terms of EC50, mg mL−1) of UAE-ethanolic and fermented extracts of S. nigra fruits (elderberry) and P. granatum fruit-peels (pomegranate) extracts.
EC50 Values
DPPH AssayHRS Assay
S. nigra fruit extracts
UAE-ethanolic extracts0.632 ± 0.031 **0.409 ± 0.031 ***
Fermented extracts1.083 ± 0.0821.672 ± 0.119
P. granatum fruit-peels extracts
UAE-ethanolic extracts0.004 ± 0.000 ***0.024 ± 0.003 ***
Fermented extracts0.018 ± 0.0010.068 ± 0.004
EC50 values given in mean ± SD (n = 3). Asterisks indicate significant differences between the EC50 values of the different extracts (UAE vs. fermented) for the same antioxidant method, according to t-student test *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

dos Santos Nascimento, L.B.; Gori, A.; Degano, I.; Mandoli, A.; Ferrini, F.; Brunetti, C. Comparison between Fermentation and Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction: Which Is the Most Efficient Method to Obtain Antioxidant Polyphenols from Sambucus nigra and Punica granatum Fruits? Horticulturae 2021, 7, 386. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7100386

AMA Style

dos Santos Nascimento LB, Gori A, Degano I, Mandoli A, Ferrini F, Brunetti C. Comparison between Fermentation and Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction: Which Is the Most Efficient Method to Obtain Antioxidant Polyphenols from Sambucus nigra and Punica granatum Fruits? Horticulturae. 2021; 7(10):386. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7100386

Chicago/Turabian Style

dos Santos Nascimento, Luana Beatriz, Antonella Gori, Ilaria Degano, Alessandro Mandoli, Francesco Ferrini, and Cecilia Brunetti. 2021. "Comparison between Fermentation and Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction: Which Is the Most Efficient Method to Obtain Antioxidant Polyphenols from Sambucus nigra and Punica granatum Fruits?" Horticulturae 7, no. 10: 386. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7100386

APA Style

dos Santos Nascimento, L. B., Gori, A., Degano, I., Mandoli, A., Ferrini, F., & Brunetti, C. (2021). Comparison between Fermentation and Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction: Which Is the Most Efficient Method to Obtain Antioxidant Polyphenols from Sambucus nigra and Punica granatum Fruits? Horticulturae, 7(10), 386. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7100386

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop