Next Article in Journal
Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni: The Interaction of Night Interruption on Gas Exchange, Flowering Delay, and Steviol Glycosides Synthesis
Next Article in Special Issue
Phytochemicals, Antioxidant and Antidiabetic Activities of Extracts from Miliusa velutina Flowers
Previous Article in Journal
Quality Attributes of Chitosan-Coated Cornelian Cherry (Cornus mas L.) Fruits under Different Storage Temperatures
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sterols and Triterpene Diols in Virgin Olive Oil: A Comprehensive Review on Their Properties and Significance, with a Special Emphasis on the Influence of Variety and Ripening Degree
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Horticulturae
Volume 7
Issue 12
10.3390/horticulturae7120541
horticulturae-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antioxidant and Anti-Obesity Potentials of Korean-Native Wild Vegetables (Allium species)

by
Ji Yeon Lee
1,†,
Kyung Hye Seo
2,†,
Eun Young Lee
3,†,
Yun-Jeong Ji
3,
Yun Ji Lee
3,
Min Hye Kang
3,
Hyun-A Seong
4 and
Hyung Don Kim
3,4,*
1
MEDIOGEN, Co., Ltd., Jecheon 27159, Korea
2
Development of Horticultural Crop Research, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science, RDA, Jeonju 55365, Korea
3
Department of Herbal Crop Research, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science, RDA, Eumsung 27709, Korea
4
Department of Biochemistry, School of Life Sciences, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Horticulturae 2021, 7(12), 541; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7120541
Submission received: 2 November 2021 / Revised: 27 November 2021 / Accepted: 29 November 2021 / Published: 2 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactivity, Phytochemical and Nutritional Composition of Natural Products)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Four Korea-native wild vegetables belonging to the Allium genus (Allium tuberosum Rottl., Allium senescens L., Allium thunbergii G. Don., and Allium sacculiferum Maxim.) were investigated for their antioxidant and anti-obesity potential, in order to promote the utilization of wild edible plants for the development of potential new crops. In this study, we compared the antioxidant activity of the plant extracts by ABTS+ and DPPH scavenging method. We then compared the anti-adipogenic effects of the extracts in adipocytes. We quantified the phenolics in the extracts using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to identify the bioactive compounds. A. tuberosum and A. sacculiferum had a higher total phenolic content (19.0 ± 0.3 and 19.6 ± 0.7 mg GA/g extract, respectively) than A. senescens and A. thunbergii (16.0 ± 0.2 and 14.5 ± 0.7 mg GA/g extract). Caffeic acid, an antioxidant and anti-adipogenic compound, was detected in A. tuberosum and A. sacculiferum, but not in A. senescens and A. thunbergii. A. tuberosum, and A. sacculiferum showed superior antioxidative and anti-adipogenic activities compared to A. senescens and A. thunbergii. Therefore, A. tuberosum and A. sacculiferum, both of which contain antioxidant and anti-adipogenic phenolics, such as caffeic acid, present a therapeutic potential against obesity. Various phenolic compounds, which have been found to differ among Allium spp., may partially account for differences among the Allium spp. with respect to their antioxidant and anti-obesity effects.

1. Introduction

Globally, obesity has emerged as a major cause of various metabolic diseases, such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and osteoporosis. It is known that high-fat or high-calorie diets can cause hyperlipidemia, obesity, increased oxidative stress, and increased inflammation [1]. Oxidative stress disrupts the balance between reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antioxidant defense systems [2]. Oxidative stress causes cellular DNA damage and the oxidation of enzyme cofactors, thus resulting in various diseases such as cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, and aging processes [3]. In addition, oxidative stress promotes adipogenesis through NADPH oxidase, a major source of intracellular lipid and ROS generation [4]. Oxidative stress, including free radicals and ROS, can be inhibited or eliminated by enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants to maintain cell balance [5]. According to recent studies, maintaining hypoglycemia, regulating the body’s antioxidant system and insulin, inhibiting the differentiation and proliferation of pre-adipocytes, and suppressing adipogenesis are all thought to suppress obesity [6].
Plants generate specialized metabolites in order to protect themselves against insects, viruses, and dispersing animals [7,8]. These metabolites include alkaloids, glycosides, amines, steroids, flavonoids, and related metabolites [7,8]. They possess biological activities and are mostly found in the leaves of various plants [7]. Among plant metabolites, phenolics have various biological effects, such as antioxidant, anti-microbial, and anti-diabetic properties [9]. In particular, phenolics are compounds directly linked to non-enzymatic antioxidants because of their reactivity as hydrogen or electron donors and reactivity with other antioxidants [10]. Phenolics are useful natural compounds capable of preventing oxidative stress and are considered important in food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries [11].
Wild vegetables and flowers of the Allium spp. belong to the Amaryllidaceae family, with approximately 977 different spp. of garlic, onions, chives, shallots, and leeks [12]. The most important Allium spp. contain flavonoids, organosulfur compounds, and saponin. Allium tuberosum (A. tuberosum) grows in the wild in the central and northern parts of Asia, such as Japan, China, Korea, India, Nepal, Thailand, and the Philippines. Of these countries, only China, Korea, and Japan use A. tuberosum as a food source [12]. In Korea, A. tuberosum grows in the mountains, and its industrial cultivation has increased due to the development of greenhouses, pest control technology, and pharmaceuticals. A. tuberosum is a green-yellow vegetable that contains many nutrients, such as carotene, vitamin B2, vitamin C, calcium, and iron. It is known to have anti-cancer [13], anti-bacterial [14], anti-diabetic, hepatoprotective [15], and anti-obesity activities [16]. Other Allium spp. that are cultivated in Korea include A. anisopodium, A. cyanem, A. cyanem var. deltoides, A. deltoidefistulosum, A. senescens, A. thunbergii, and A. sacculiferum. [12]. Of these, A. senescens, A. thunbergii, and A. sacculiferum have anti-obesity, anti-cancer, and anti-inflammatory activities [16,17,18,19]. Although the classification and growth among Allium spp. in Korea are being studied, studies on their biological activity and phenolic profiling are scarce [20,21].
In this study, we analyzed the general growth characteristics of four Allium spp. (A. tuberosum, A. senescens, A. thunbergii, and A. sacculiferum) in identical environmental conditions and determined their antioxidant and anti-adipogenic activities. We also investigated their bioactive components by total phenol (TP) content analysis and phenolic profiling.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Growth Characteristics

The plant samples of Allium spp. (A. tuberosum, A. senescens, A. thunbergii, and A. sacculiferum) were collected from Korea. Voucher specimens were deposited at the Korea Medicinal Resources Herbarium, Eumseong, Korea (Table 1).
Allium spp. seeds were sown in 200-cell plug trays (60 cm × 41 cm × 5 cm) containing commercial medium (Baroker medium, SeoulBio, Eumseong, Korea) and were maintained at 20 ± 5 °C in a greenhouse. After 15 days, the seedlings were cultivated in the field. Allium spp. were harvested after 2 months (15 June 2018), and their growth characteristics were examined (Figure 1). For subsequent experiments, 50 g of Allium spp. was extracted with water (500 mL), repeated 3 times, at room temperature for 24 h and concentrated using an evaporator system under reflux (BÜCHI, Meierseggstrasse, Flawil, Switzerland). Allium spp. extracts were freeze-dried.

2.2. Cell Culture

The 3T3-L1 pre-adipocytes were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (CL-173, ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibco, Mississauga, Canada) containing 1× penicillin/streptomycin/glutamine (PSG, Gibco, Mississauga, Canada) and 10% bovine calf serum (Gibco, Mississauga, Canada) at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator. The medium was replaced every 2 days for subculture. Cells were used at passages 5–10 in all of the experiments.

2.3. Cell Viability

Cell viability was measured with CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) [22]. The 3T3-L1 pre-adipocytes were cultured in 96-well plates at 1 × 105 cells/mL for 24 h and were treated with Allium spp. extracts. After 24 h, the absorbance was measured at 490 nm using a multi-plate reader (Synergy H1, Biotek, Winooski, VT, USA).

2.4. Differentiation of Pre-Adipocytes

The 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were differentiated as previously described [23]. Briefly, confluent pre-adipocytes were differentiated using DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, Mississauga, Canada), 1 × PSG, 1 mM insulin (Gibco, Mississauga, Canada), 0.5 mM isobutylmethylxanthine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and dexamethasone (0.1 mM) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 3 days. DMEM media with 10% FBS, 1 × PSG and 1 mM insulin was used until cells were completely differentiated for an additional 6 days.

2.5. ORO Staining

Cultures were fixed for at least 1 h with 10% formalin diluted in water, in a 37 °C incubator, then washed twice with water and stained with a working solution of ORO (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). To determine the extent of adipose conversion, 100% isopropanol was added to the stained tissue [24]. The absorbance of the extracted dye was read at 510 nm using a microplate reader.

2.6. Phenolic Analysis and Antioxidant Activity

2.6.1. DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Assay

The antioxidant activity of Allium spp. was determined using a DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) scavenging assay following the method of Nazlić with some modifications. Briefly, 40 μL of sample (0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, and 2 mg/mL) was mixed with 0.2 mM DPPH (160 μL) [25]. After 30 min, the absorbance was measured at 517 nm using a multimode microplate reader. The DPPH radical scavenging activity was expressed as IC50 value, a concentration that scavenges 50% of the free radicals.

2.6.2. ABTS Radical Scavenging Assay

The ABTS+ scavenging assay was performed as described by Tanruean et al., with slight modifications [26]. The ABTS+ solution was prepared with ABTS tablets (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and potassium persulfate (2.6 mM) at 4 °C for 16 h with the light blocked. Absorbance was measured at 734 nm using a multi-mode microplate reader. The radical scavenging activity was expressed as IC50 value, a concentration that scavenges 50% of the radicals.

2.6.3. Determination of TP Content

The TP content was analyzed using the Folin-Denis method [27]. Briefly, 500 μL of each extract (3 mg/mL) was added to 50 μL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA). After 5 min, 100 μL of 20% sodium carbonate anhydrous saturated solution was added. After 1 h, the absorbance was measured at 725 nm using a multi-plate reader. The TP content was determined through a comparison with the standards. Gallic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was used as a standard, and the TP content (mg/g) was determined using the following equation (R2 = 0.999):
Y = 0.0058X − 0.0165
where Y is absorbance and X is measured concentration (mg/mL).

2.6.4. Phenolics Analysis Using HPLC

The Agilent 1200 series HPLC was used (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and samples were analyzed through a reversed-phase using a synergy fusion RP column (250 × 4.6 mm, 4 μm; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA). All analysis conditions were performed as previously described [28]. Phenolic standards such as homogentisic acid, protocatechuic acid, gentisic acid, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, phloretic acid, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, veratric acid, cinnamic acid, quercetin, and naringenin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were prepared and filtered using 0.45 μM polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF; Pall Co., Port Washington, NY, USA).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

All experimental results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments. The statistical significance of the differences was calculated using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Duncan’s test, and correlations were calculated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, ver. 21.0 for Window).

3. Results

3.1. Growth Characteristic of Allium Spp.

In this study, the growth characteristics of four Allium spp. (A. tuberosum, A. senescens, A. thunbergia, and A. sacculiferum) were measured immediately after cultivation (Figure 1 and Table 2). The total length was similar among the Allium spp., at 212–244 mm, except for A. sacculiferum, which was 110.8 mm in length. The stem diameter and root length differed considerably between A. tuberosum and A. sacculiferum, but the number of leaves did not show a significant difference among species.
Horticulturae 07 00541 g001 550
Figure 1. General images of A. tuberosum (a), A. senescens (b), A. thunbergii (c), and A. sacculiferum (d).
Figure 1. General images of A. tuberosum (a), A. senescens (b), A. thunbergii (c), and A. sacculiferum (d).
Horticulturae 07 00541 g001

3.2. Antioxidant Activities of Allium Spp.

The antioxidant activity of Allium spp. were evaluated using DPPH and ABTS free radical scavenging methods, which are common and rapid methods for in vitro antioxidant assay [29]. The IC50 values of Allium spp. for DPPH and ABTS + scavenging activity varied from 694.2 to 980.0 and from 44.0 to 396.2 µg/mL, respectively (Table 3). The extracts of A. tuberosum (694.2 ± 10.0 µg/mL) and A. sacculiferum (723.1 ± 12.3 µg/mL) showed higher scavenging activity for DPPH free radical without significant differences between them. The extract of A. sacculiferum showed the highest ABTS+ scavenging (44.0 ± 0.7 µg/mL). The highest yield of Allium spp. was approximately 55% and was consistent with all spp. except for A. tuberosum.

3.3. Cell Viability of Allium Spp.

The viability of 3T3-L1 cells, when treated with the Allium spp. Extract, was investigated using the MTS assay, which is commonly used for cell viability analyses by measuring the activity of mitochondrial dehydrogenase (Figure 2) [30]. There was no difference observed in the viability of 3T3-L1 cells when treated with 25–200 μg/mL (≥100%) of Allium spp. extract. It has been reported that cells are considered highly viable if the viability is more than 90% [31]. Thus, extracts of Allium spp. of concentrations up to 100 μg/mL (≥90%) were chosen for subsequent experiments.

3.4. Effect of The Differentiation Inhibition of Allium Spp. by ORO Staining

Adipogenesis has been reported to contribute to the differentiation of pre-adipocytes into adipocytes, lipid accumulation, and growth arrest [32]. Lipid droplet accumulation in adipocytes is known to be an indicator of adipogenesis [33]. Therefore, the anti-adipogenic effect of Allium spp. extracts, with a media of differentiation (MDI), were evaluated using ORO in 3T3-L1 cells (Figure 3A). Microscopy revealed that the MDI positive control had more stained lipid droplets than in the undifferentiated negative controls. The amount was also significantly increased in the differentiated controls, to 2.01-fold higher than the undifferentiated control. Cells treated with extracts of A. tuberosum (50 and 100 μg/mL; 0.82 and 0.74-fold vs. MDI control, p < 0.05) and A. sacculiferum (50 and 100 μg/mL; 0.69 and 0.57-fold vs. MDI control, p < 0.05) had markedly decreased lipid droplets, as shown in Figure 3B.

3.5. Profiling of Phenolics in Allium Spp.

Chromatographic techniques are necessary for identifying bioactive compounds [34]. Thus, we performed a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis to determine the phenolics present in Allium spp. Homogenetic acids were detected in all Allium spp. Additionally, caffeic acid and ferulic acid were detected in A. tuberosum and A. sacculiferum. Veratric acid and quercetin were detected in A. senescens, and ferulic acid, veratric acid, and quercetin were detected in A. thunbergii (Figure 4).
A quantitative analysis using each calibration curve showed that homogentisic acid was highest in A. senescens (75.7 ± 1.6 μg/g d.b. extract), followed by that in A. sacculiferum (63.0 ± 0.5 μg/g d.b. extract), A. tuberosum (50.8 ± 0.7 μg/g d.b. extract), and A. thunbergii (47.8 ± 0.5 μg/g d.b. extract) (Table 4). Caffeic acid was only detected in A. thunbergii (3.9 ± 0.1 μg/g d.b. extract) and A. sacculiferum (3.6 ± 0.1 μg/g d.b. extract). Ferulic acid was highest in A. tuberosum (15.9 ± 0.1 μg/g d.b. extract), with A. thunbergii (0.6 ± 0.2 μg/g d.b. extract) and A. sacculiferum (0.3 ± 0.1 μg/g d.b. extract) having smaller amounts. Veratric acid and quercetin were only detected in A. senescens (58.9 ± 1.3 and 53.8 ± 0.6 μg/g d.b. extract) and A. thunbergii (54.4 ± 1.0 and 44.0 ± 1.0 μg/g d.b. extract).
Based on our results, a correlation analysis was performed between biological activities and phenolics (Table 5). The lipid accumulation correlated with TP (−0.826), DPPH (0.867), ABTS (0.784), and caffeic acid (−0.889). These results show that Allium spp. have a significant correlation with the antioxidant activity of caffeic acid, which inhibits lipid accumulation.

4. Discussion

A. tuberosum is widely consumed as a traditional ingredient in Korea and has been used as an herbal medicine for a long time [12]. However, the biological activity of leeks grown in Korea is only known for only few of the Allium spp. There have been many studies analyzing the functional activity of Allium spp. methanol extracts in preventing obesity [16,17,19]. However, methanol extracts cannot be used as food. We selected three types of Allium spp. with anti-obesity effects, and A. thunbergii, which is often used interchangeably with A. sacculiferum although it was found to be an independent spp. In a recent study [35]. In this study, we investigated the growth characteristics, secondary metabolites, and beneficial effects of Allium spp. In Korea for use as food, and the correlation between them.
The antioxidant effect of plants is known to be beneficial not only for plants but also for humans. For example, various phenolic substances have been reported to have an excellent free radical scavenging ability. Free radicals in vivo affect aging and disease in living tissue. Plant phenolic compounds are known to exhibit physiologically active functions by binding phenolic hydroxyl groups to macromolecules, such as enzymes [36]. TP is known to have a high antioxidant activity, which is because the phenolic hydroxyl group (OH) of the compound binds to proteins and polymers. In general, it has been reported that as the content of TP increases, physiological activities such as antioxidant activity increase [37]. DPPH and ABTS radicals are relatively stable free radicals and are reduced by sulfur-containing amino acids such as cysteine, GSH, ascorbate, and butylated hydroxyanisole. Accordingly, DPPH and ABTS are widely used to analyze the in vitro antioxidant activity of various extracts [38]. On comparing the antioxidant effect of all Allium spp., A. sacculiferum was identified to have the highest radical scavenging effect and TP content.
Adipogenesis is similar to the development of obesity in humans, and the excessive differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells into pre-adipocytes can induce obesity; therefore, these cells have been widely used in studies that assess the characteristics of adipogenesis and obesity [39]. A correlation between antioxidants and adipogenesis has been reported to promote the conversion of pre-adipocytes to mature adipocytes [24]. Thus, to investigate the inhibitory effect of A. tuberosum and A. sacculiferum extracts, which were found to have high antioxidant activity, ORO staining was performed. They had an inhibitory effect on the formation of lipid droplets. Therefore, A. tuberosum and A. sacculiferum extracts, which have been confirmed to have antioxidant activity, can be utilized for their anti-adipogenic effects.
According to a number of recent studies, plant-derived phenolic compounds inhibit adipogenesis [40]. Phenolic profiling was performed utilizing an HPLC analysis to determine the component responsible for the inhibitory action of Allium spp. In our study, caffeic acid was detected in A. tuberosum and A. sacculiferum. Caffeic acid has been reported to be an anti-obesity agent [41]. Using our data, an analysis was conducted to determine the correlation between phenolics and the biological activities of Allium spp. (Table 5). The anti-adipogenic and antioxidant effects of A. tuberosum and A. sacculiferum may be due to its caffeic acid content.
Collectively, these results suggest that Allium spp. have potential antioxidant and anti-adipogenic effects, which derive from the presence of phenolic compounds, particularly caffeic acid.

5. Conclusions

Among Allium spp., A. tuberosum and A. sacculiferum have the antioxidant potential of scavenging free radicals and also inhibit adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 cells by decreasing lipid accumulation. The properties of these species were found to be correlated with their phenolic content, specifically caffeic acid. Consequently, various metabolites and phenolic compounds were found to differ according to Allium spp., thus showing differences among the Allium spp., with respect to their beneficial biological effects.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.H.S. and H.D.K.; methodology, J.Y.L., E.Y.L. and Y.-J.J.; data curation K.H.S., E.Y.L., M.H.K. and H.-A.S.; resources, J.Y.L., K.H.S. and Y.J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Y.L., K.H.S. and E.Y.L.; writing—review and editing, K.H.S. and H.D.K.; funding acquisition, M.H.K. and H.D.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was carried out with the support of the “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. PJ01361601)” and the RDA Fellowship Program of the National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration, Korea.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funding sponsors had no role in the design of the study, collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data, writing of the manuscript, or the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Dandona, P.; Ghanim, H.; Chaudhuri, A.; Dhindsa, S.; Kim, S.S. Macronutrient intake induces oxidative and inflammatory stress: Potential relevance to atherosclerosis and insulin resistance. Exp. Mol. Med. 2010, 42, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Betteridge, D.J. What is oxidative stress? Metabolism 2000, 49, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sies, H.; Berndt, C.; Jones, D.P. Oxidative stress. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2017, 86, 715–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. De Villiers, D.; Potgieter, M.; Ambele, M.A.; Adam, L.; Durandt, C.; Pepper, M.S. The role of reactive oxygen species in adipogenic differentiation. In Genome Editing; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; Volume 1083, pp. 125–144. [Google Scholar]
  5. Haida, Z.; Hakiman, M. A comprehensive review on the determination of enzymatic assay and nonenzymatic antioxidant activities. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 1555–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Wang, Y.W.; Jones, P.J. Conjugated linoleic acid and obesity control: Efficacy and mechanisms. Int. J. Obes. 2004, 28, 941–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ahmad, P.; Jaleel, C.A.; Salem, M.A.; Nabi, G.; Sharma, S. Roles of enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants in plants during abiotic stress. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2010, 30, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jain, C.; Khatana, S.; Vijayvergia, R. Bioactivity of secondary metabolites of various plants: A review. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2019, 10, 494–498. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lattanzio, V.; Kroon, P.A.; Quideau, S.; Treutter, D. Plant phenolics—Secondary metabolites with diverse functions. Recent Adv. Polyphen. Res. 2008, 1, 1–35. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rice-Evans, C.; Miller, N.; Paganga, G. Antioxidant properties of phenolic compounds. Trends Plant Sci. 1997, 2, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chrząszcz, M.; Krzemińska, B.; Celiński, R.; Szewczyk, K. Phenolic Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Plants Belonging to the Cephalaria (Caprifoliaceae) Genus. Plants 2021, 10, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Choi, H.J.; Oh, B.U. A partial revision of Allium (Amaryllidaceae) in Korea and north-eastern China. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2011, 167, 153–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Lee, J.H.; Yang, H.S.; Park, K.W.; Kim, J.Y.; Lee, M.K.; Jeong, I.Y.; Seo, K.I. Mechanisms of thiosulfinates from Allium tuberosum L.-induced apoptosis in HT-29 human colon cancer cells. Toxicol. Lett. 2009, 188, 142–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, Y.; Wang, C.; Gu, Y.; Wang, P.; Song, W.; Ma, J.; Yang, X. The variability of bacterial communities in both the endosphere and ectosphere of different niches in Chinese chives (Allium tuberosum). PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0227671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tang, X.; Olatunji, O.J.; Zhou, Y.; Hou, X. Allium tuberosum: Antidiabetic and hepatoprotective activities. Food Res. Int. 2017, 102, 681–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Park, H.S.; Choi, E.J.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, G.H. Evaluation of Allium vegetables for anti-adipogenic, anti-cancer, and anti-inflammatory activities in vitro. J. Life Sci. 2013, 5, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Choi, H.Y.; Kim, G.H. Inhibitory effects of Allium senescens L. methanol extracts on reactive oxygen species production and lipid accumulation during differentiation in 3T3-L1 cells. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 46, 498–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, J.; Lee, D.H.; Badamtsetseg, B.; Lee, S.; Kim, S. Anti-Proliferative Effect of Allium senescens L. Extr. Hum. T-Cell Acute Lymphocytic Leuk. Cells. Mol. 2021, 26, 35. [Google Scholar]
  19. Choi, H.Y.; Kim, G.H. Inhibitory effects of Allium sacculiferum Max. methanol extracts on ROS production and lipid accumulation during differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 43, 822–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Choi, H.J.; Jang, C.G.; Ko, S.C.; Oh, B.U. A taxonomic review of Korean Allium (Alliaceae). Korean J. Plant Taxon. 2004, 34, 119–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gulcin, İ. Antioxidants and antioxidant methods: An updated overview. Arch. Toxicol. 2020, 94, 651–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Riss, T.L.; Moravec, R.A.; Niles, A.L.; Duellman, S.; Benink, H.A.; Worzella, T.J.; Minor, L. Cell Viability Assays. Assay Guidanced Manual; Eli Lilly & Company and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2016; pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee, J.Y.; Park, J.Y.; Kim, H.D.; Lee, S.E.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, Y.; Seo, K.H. Anti-oxidant and anti-adipocyte differentiation of Aster glehni and Aster yomena. J. Nutr. Health 2019, 52, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kinkel, A.D.; Fernyhough, M.E.; Helterline, D.L.; Vierck, J.L.; Oberg, K.S.; Vance, T.J.; Dodson, M.V. Oil red-O stains non-adipogenic cells: A precautionary note. Cytotechnology 2004, 46, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Nazlić, M.; Kremer, D.; Grubešić, R.J.; Soldo, B.; Vuko, E.; Stabentheiner, E.; Dunkić, V. Endemic Veronica saturejoides Vis. ssp. saturejoides–Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of free volatile compounds. Plants 2020, 9, 1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tanruean, K.; Poolprasert, P.; Suwannarach, N.; Kumla, J.; Lumyong, S. Phytochemical Analysis and Evaluation of Antioxidant and Biological Activities of Extracts from Three Clauseneae Plants in Northern Thailand. Plants 2021, 10, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bärlocher, F.; Graça, M.A. Total Phenolics. Methods to Study Litter Decomposition; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 157–161. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee, J.Y.; Park, J.Y.; Seo, H.T.; Seong, H.A.; Ji, Y.J.; Lee, S.E.; Kim, H.D. Samnamul (Shoots of Aruncus dioicus) Inhibit Adipogenesis by Downregulating Adipocyte-Specific Transcription Factors in 3T3-L1 Adipocytes. Processes 2020, 8, 1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Malich, G.; Markovic, B.; Winder, C. The sensitivity and specificity of the MTS tetrazolium assay for detecting the in vitro cytotoxicity of 20 chemicals using human cell lines. Toxicology 1997, 124, 179–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ouyang, L.; Yao, R.; Chen, X.; Na, J.; Sun, W. 3D printing of HEK 293FT cell-laden hydrogel into macroporous constructs with high cell viability and normal biological functions. Biofabrication 2015, 7, 015010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gregoire, F.M. Adipocyte differentiation: From fibroblast to endocrine cell. Exp. Biol. Med. 2001, 226, 997–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ilavenil, S.; Arasu, M.V.; Lee, J.C.; Kim, D.H.; Roh, S.G.; Park, H.S.; Choi, K.C. Trigonelline attenuates the adipocyte differentiation and lipid accumulation in 3T3-L1 cells. Phytomedicine 2014, 21, 758–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Granato, D.; Shahidi, F.; Wrolstad, R.; Kilmartin, P.; Melton, L.D.; Hidalgo, F.J.; Finglas, P. Antioxidant activity, total phenolics and flavonoids contents: Should we ban in vitro screening methods? Food Chem. 2018, 264, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Choi, H.J.; Oh, B.U. Taxonomy of the Allium sect. Sacculiferum in Korea: With a special reference to the morphology. Korean J. Plant Taxon. 2003, 33, 339–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Achakzai, A.K.K.; Achakzai, P.; Masood, A.; Kayani, S.A.; Tareen, R.B. Response of plant parts and age on the distribution of secondary metabolites on plants found in Quetta. Pak. J. Bot 2009, 41, 2129–2135. [Google Scholar]
  36. Pandey, K.B.; Rizvi, S.I. Plant polyphenols as dietary antioxidants in human health and disease. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2009, 2, 270–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Kwak, C.S.; Kim, M.J.; Kim, S.G.; Park, S.; Kim, I.G.; Kang, H.S. Antioxidant and antiobesity activities of oral treatment with ethanol extract from sprout of evening primrose (Oenothera laciniata) in high fat diet-induced obese mice. J. Nutr. Health 2019, 52, 529–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gülçin, İ.; Berashvili, D.; Gepdiremen, A. Antiradical and antioxidant activity of total anthocyanins from Perilla pankinensis decne. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 101, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Poudel, B.; Lim, S.W.; Ki, H.H.; Nepali, S.; Lee, Y.M.; Kim, D.K. Dioscin inhibits adipogenesis through the AMPK/MAPK pathway in 3T3-L1 cells and modulates fat accumulation in obese mice. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2014, 34, 1401–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Hsu, C.L.; Yen, G.C. Effects of flavonoids and phenolic acids on the inhibition of adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 8404–8410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Juman, S.; Yasui, N.; Okuda, H.; Ueda, A.; Negishi, H.; Miki, T.; Ikeda, K. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester inhibits differentiation to adipocytes in 3T3-L1 mouse fibroblasts. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2010, 33, 1484–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Horticulturae 07 00541 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of Allium spp. extracts (25–200 µg/mL) on viability of 3T3-L1 cell, analyzed by MTS assay. All values are means ± SD (n = 3). The statistically significant difference was determined by Duncan’s test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001). Conc., concentration.
Figure 2. Effect of Allium spp. extracts (25–200 µg/mL) on viability of 3T3-L1 cell, analyzed by MTS assay. All values are means ± SD (n = 3). The statistically significant difference was determined by Duncan’s test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001). Conc., concentration.
Horticulturae 07 00541 g002
Horticulturae 07 00541 g003 550
Figure 3. Inhibition of lipid accumulation by Allium spp. extracts, as analyzed by microscopy (A) and quantifications (B). Differentiated 3T3-L1 cells were treated every 2 days with extracts (50 and 100 µg/mL) for 8 days in adipocyte-induction media. All values are means ± SD (n = 3). Values with different superscript letters indicate a statistically significant difference determined by Duncan’s test (p < 0.05). MDI, media of differentiation; Conc., concentration.
Figure 3. Inhibition of lipid accumulation by Allium spp. extracts, as analyzed by microscopy (A) and quantifications (B). Differentiated 3T3-L1 cells were treated every 2 days with extracts (50 and 100 µg/mL) for 8 days in adipocyte-induction media. All values are means ± SD (n = 3). Values with different superscript letters indicate a statistically significant difference determined by Duncan’s test (p < 0.05). MDI, media of differentiation; Conc., concentration.
Horticulturae 07 00541 g003
Horticulturae 07 00541 g004 550
Figure 4. Chromatogram of phenolic compounds present in water extract of Allium spp., as analyzed by HPLC. Peak identification: 1. homogentisic acid, 2. Protocatechinic acid, 3. Gentisic acid, 4. Chlorogenic acid, 5. Caffeic acid, 6. Propionic acid, 7. Coumaric acid, 8. Ferulic acid, 9. Veratric acid, 10. Cinnamic acid, 11. Quercetin, 12. Naringenin, and 13. Hesperiin. Chromatogram of A. tuberosum (A), A. senescens (B), A. thunbergii (C) and A. sacculiferum (D).
Figure 4. Chromatogram of phenolic compounds present in water extract of Allium spp., as analyzed by HPLC. Peak identification: 1. homogentisic acid, 2. Protocatechinic acid, 3. Gentisic acid, 4. Chlorogenic acid, 5. Caffeic acid, 6. Propionic acid, 7. Coumaric acid, 8. Ferulic acid, 9. Veratric acid, 10. Cinnamic acid, 11. Quercetin, 12. Naringenin, and 13. Hesperiin. Chromatogram of A. tuberosum (A), A. senescens (B), A. thunbergii (C) and A. sacculiferum (D).
Horticulturae 07 00541 g004
Table
Table 1. Collection sites, voucher numbers, local names, and parts used of Allium spp.
Table 1. Collection sites, voucher numbers, local names, and parts used of Allium spp.
PlantCollection SiteVoucher No.Local NamesParts Used
A. tuberosumMt.Obong,
(Yangyang, Gangwon)		MPS001706BuchuAerial part
A. senescensPeak. Hyangro,
(Yangyang, Gangwon)		MPS005298Dume-buchuAerial part
A. thunbergiiMt.Sobaek,
(Danyang, Chungbuk)		MPS004662San-buchuAerial part
A. sacculiferumNIHHS
(Eumseong, Chungbuk)		MPS005491Chamsan-buchuAerial part
Table
Table 2. Plant height, stem diameter, length of root, and number of leaves according to Allium spp.
Table 2. Plant height, stem diameter, length of root, and number of leaves according to Allium spp.
PlantPlant Height
(Mm)		Stem Diameter
(Mm)		Length of Longest Root
(Mm)		Number of Leaves
A. tuberosum212.5 ± 4.3 b0.4 ± 0.0 c78.7 ± 3.5 b4.0 ± 1.4 a
A. senescens242.0 ± 9.5 a46.7 ± 2.9 a114.8 ± 10.9 a3.7 ± 0.6 ab
A. thunbergii244.5 ± 11.0 a35.0 ± 10.6 b124.0 ± 17.7 a2.3 ± 0.0 b
A. sacculiferum110.8 ± 18.7 c2.0 ± 0.7 c40.0 ± 4.2 c3.3 ± 0.0 ab
All values are means ± SD, and values with different superscript letters on the same column indicate a statistically significant difference determined by Duncan’s test (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 3. Anti-oxidative activities of Allium spp. water extracts.
Table 3. Anti-oxidative activities of Allium spp. water extracts.
PlantsAntioxidant Activity 1TP 2Yields 3
DpphAbts+
A. tuberosum694.2 ± 10.7 b100.2 ± 1.7 b17.6 ± 0.3 a29.7
A. senescens880.0 ± 51.4 a101.1 ± 3.7 b16.0 ± 0.2 c55.3
A. thunbergii980.0 ± 5.1 a396.2 ± 2.6 a14.5 ± 0.7 d55
A. sacculiferum723.1 ± 12.3 c44.0 ± 0.7 c17.3 ± 0.1 b53.1
Ascorbic acid55.34 ± 2.08 d31.29 ± 1.47 d--
1 Values are indicated as IC50 values (μg/mL). 2 Total phenolic acid (mg GA/g extract). 3 Extract yield (%). All values are means ± SD, and values with different superscript letters on the same column indicate a statistically significant difference determined by Duncan’s test (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 4. Quantitative analysis of phenolic compounds in Allium spp. water extracts.
Table 4. Quantitative analysis of phenolic compounds in Allium spp. water extracts.
PhenolicsA. tuberosumA. senescensA. thunbergiiA. sacculiferum
Homogentic acid50.8 ± 0.7 c75.7 ± 1.6 a47.8 ± 0.5 d63.0 ± 0.5 b
Caffeic acid3.9 ± 0.1 aN.D.1N.D.3.6 ± 0.1 b
Ferulic acid15.9 ± 0.1 aN.D.0.6 ± 0.2 b0.3 ± 0.1 c
Veratric acidN.D.58.9 ± 1.3 a54.4 ± 1.0 bN.D.
QuercetinN.D.53.8 ± 0.6 a44.0 ± 1.0 bN.D.
1 Values are indicated as content (μg/g d.b. extract). N.D.; not detected. Values are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3). Values with different superscript letters in the same row indicate statistically significant differences as determined by Duncan’s test (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 5. Correlation analysis with biological activity and phenolics in Allium spp. extracts.
Table 5. Correlation analysis with biological activity and phenolics in Allium spp. extracts.
FactorsTP 1Homogentic AcidCaffeic AcidFerulic AcidDPPH 2ABTS 3Lipid Accumulation
TP −0.3730.9320.464−0.796 **−0.439−0.826 ***
Homogentic acid −0.238−0.474−0.024−0.587 *−0.120
Caffeic acid 0.618 *−0.931−0.633 *−0.889 ***
Ferulic acid −0.595 *−0.231−0.248
DPPH 0.811 **0.867 ***
ABTS 0.784 **
Lipid
accumulation
1 Total phenolic acid (mg GA/g extract). 2,3 Values are indicated as IC50 values (μg/mL). Values are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistically significant differences determined using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, J.Y.; Seo, K.H.; Lee, E.Y.; Ji, Y.-J.; Lee, Y.J.; Kang, M.H.; Seong, H.-A.; Kim, H.D. Antioxidant and Anti-Obesity Potentials of Korean-Native Wild Vegetables (Allium species). Horticulturae 2021, 7, 541. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7120541

AMA Style

Lee JY, Seo KH, Lee EY, Ji Y-J, Lee YJ, Kang MH, Seong H-A, Kim HD. Antioxidant and Anti-Obesity Potentials of Korean-Native Wild Vegetables (Allium species). Horticulturae. 2021; 7(12):541. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7120541

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Ji Yeon, Kyung Hye Seo, Eun Young Lee, Yun-Jeong Ji, Yun Ji Lee, Min Hye Kang, Hyun-A Seong, and Hyung Don Kim. 2021. "Antioxidant and Anti-Obesity Potentials of Korean-Native Wild Vegetables (Allium species)" Horticulturae 7, no. 12: 541. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7120541

APA Style

Lee, J. Y., Seo, K. H., Lee, E. Y., Ji, Y. -J., Lee, Y. J., Kang, M. H., Seong, H. -A., & Kim, H. D. (2021). Antioxidant and Anti-Obesity Potentials of Korean-Native Wild Vegetables (Allium species). Horticulturae, 7(12), 541. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7120541

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop