Next Article in Journal
Chemical Composition, Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, Antibiofilm and Anti-Insect Activities of Jasminum grandiflorum Essential Oil
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact of Blue Light on Plant Growth, Flowering and Accumulation of Medicinal Flavones in Scutellaria baicalensis and S. lateriflora
Previous Article in Journal
Physiological Responses of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) to Soil Contamination with Pb
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phytochemical Composition of Red-Fleshed Apple Cultivar ‘Baya Marisa’ Compared to Traditional, White-Fleshed Apple Cultivar ‘Golden Delicious’
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Volatile Compounds and Antioxidant and Antifungal Activity of Bud and Needle Extracts from Three Populations of Pinus mugo Turra Growing in Romania

by
Diana Ionela (Stegarus) Popescu
1,2,
Ecaterina Lengyel
3,
Florian George Apostolescu
4,
Liliana Cristina Soare
5,
Oana Romina Botoran
1,2,* and
Nicoleta Anca Șuțan
5,*
1
National Research and Development Institute for Cryogenic and Isotopic Technologies-ICSI Ramnicu Valcea, 4th Uzinei Street, 240050 Ramnicu Valcea, Romania
2
Academy of Romanian Scientists, Splaiul Independentei 54, 050044 Bucharest, Romania
3
Department of Agricultural Sciences and Food Engineering, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Doctor Ion Rațiu 7, 550012 Sibiu, Romania
4
Doctoral School, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 2 Petru Rareş Street, 200349 Craiova, Romania
5
Department of Natural Sciences, University of Pitesti, Targu din Vale1, 110040 Pitesti, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2022, 8(10), 952; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8100952
Submission received: 21 September 2022 / Revised: 11 October 2022 / Accepted: 12 October 2022 / Published: 14 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Compounds in Horticultural Plants)

Abstract

:
Pinus mugo Turra is a shrub-like conifer with multiple healing properties. P. mugo extracts are rich in active ingredients such as volatile compounds, tannin, higher alcohols, vitamins, and minerals. In this study, we identified and quantified the secondary metabolites from buds and needles of P. mugo harvested from three different mountain areas in Romania. The main volatile compounds contained in the extracts were analyzed by gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry, and the most significant were pinene, germacrene, limonene, and caryophyllene. The total polyphenol content (TPC) was in the range of 46.77 ± 0.3 and 77.99 ± 0.5 mg GAE/g and the total flavonoid content (TFC) 24.90 ± 0.1 and 54.78 ± 0.3 mg QE/g. The content of ascorbic acid ranged between 12.21 mg/100 g and 27.34 mg/100 g, concentrations that are recommended for natural sources of ascorbic acid. Moderate antimicrobial activity on yeasts and molds was not dependent on plant origin. By highlighting the rich content of active compounds, and moderate antioxidant and antifungal activity, this study is an argument for the beneficial use of P. mugo bud and needle extracts, regardless of the habitat of origin on the Romanian territory, in the fields of medicine and the food industry or in the implementation of eco-friendly practices.

1. Introduction

Pinus, the largest genus of conifers, with approximately 113 species, is widespread in the Northern Hemisphere, especially in the high massifs, where subalpine communities are formed [1,2,3].
Pinus mugo Turra, also known as dwarf mountain pine, is a small conifer, native to Central and Eastern Europe, that grows at altitudes between 200 m and 2700 m [4]. In Romania, it is found starting from an altitude of 1350 m in the Western Carpathians to 2100 m in the Southern Carpathians [5], as quoted by Roșca et al. [6]. P. mugo is a cold-tolerant xerophyte, light-loving, well adapted to harsh environmental conditions, surviving on nitrogen-poor soils, tolerating precipitation in varying amounts, and is perfectly adapted to petrophytic habitats, rich in basic rocks such as limestone, sandstone, granite, etc. Due to its long and extensive roots, dwarf mountain pine has an important role in consolidating wetlands, in protecting and fixing debris and weather-eroded coasts, and in regulating the hydrological regime, being an excellent buffer for avalanches [7,8]. At the same time, being an evergreen plant with an attractive shape, a large number of cultivars find dendrological applicability [9,10].
From the perspective of chemical composition, studies have shown that valuable plant secondary metabolites, including those from genus Pinus, possess significant health benefits [11,12,13,14]. More than 100 secondary metabolites have been identified in P. mugo essential oil by Venditti et al. [15], the most important accumulations being of valuable compounds such as oxygenated monoterpenes (32.7%) and oxygenated diterpenes (22.3%), but also sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (13.1%) and oxygenated sesquiterpenes (11.6%). The presence of monoterpenes, diterpenes, and other volatile compounds in the extracts or essential oils extracted from Pinus sp. was highlighted in several studies [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. The needles of Pinus sp. are a rich source of ascorbic acid, flavonoids, and other phenolic compounds [25,26,27].
From the needles, bark, buds, and cones are obtained extracts or essential oils rich in secondary metabolites that are used against rheumatic and lung diseases, as anti-inflammatory and expectorant agents [15,28,29]. Moreover, due to its rich polyphenol composition, extracts of P. mugo have high antioxidant activity [25,30,31], which gives them antitumor and antiproliferative properties [29,32,33,34,35,36]. The pharmacological attribute is complemented by the studies carried out by Basholli-Salihu et al. [29], who highlighted the anti-inflammatory activity and cytotoxic effect of P. mugo oils on three tumor cell lines. Antibacterial and antifungal action have often been reported [21,25,31,37,38], but further studies are needed to validate the antimicrobial profile of this species.
The beneficial effects of various pine extracts on human health are often reported in the literature, but nevertheless the use of pine-based products is not greatly explored, especially as an ingredient in the food industry [3]. Lately, in Europe, there has been a growing trend regarding the use of supplements made from natural Pinus bark extracts that are highly rich in phytochemicals and known to help prevent some diseases. This idea led to the functionalization of foods and drinks with plant-based extracts. It also had a large impact on the supplement market, where the production and sale of dietary supplements, especially plant-based ones, has grown at an exponential rate. Moreover, some essential oils are acknowledged as stimulators of the nervous system. Both extracts and essential oils are used as preservatives and antioxidants in food and food packaging materials to prevent food spoilage and rancidity [21]. Having a diverse spectrum of applications, pine exracts represent a new alternative in the pharmaceutical, agricultural, and nutritional fields.
The main components of an extract or an oil from this conifer species do not depend only on its concentration, being also based on the specific odor threshold, which is essentially determined by its structure and volatility, or even by the minor components that derive from oxidation or degradation reactions and which have a strong impact on the perfume, so that the intensity of the aroma does not depend only on a single component [27]. For the aromatic constituents, the conditions during the processing and storage of plant material are very important because they are influenced by humidity and light, leading to a variation in their content that can ultimately affect the overall profile [29].
In traditional medicine, P. mugo syrup is used as an expectorant [39], in the treatment of coughs and throat inflammation [40]. In Romanian folk medicine, the leaf buds of P. mugo, harvested in February, are used in the form of a 3–10% infusion as a diuretic and antiseptic in cystitis and urethritis, and as an anti-inflammatory in respiratory diseases [41,42]. In the food industry, shoots are used for flavoring dishes of fish and meat or jam [40,43]. The use of essential oils, pine nuts, and pinewood oil was also mentioned in the manufacture of soaps, detergents, and household cleaning supplies [44]. An extensive review regarding the secondary metabolite content and the pharmacological properties, antimicrobial activity, and food applications of Pinus species was recently presented by Dziedziński et al. [14].
In this study, we aimed to evaluate the chemical composition and antioxidant and antifungal activity of extracts from the buds and needles of P. mugo harvested from three mountain massifs located in the southwestern, central–eastern, and central–southern parts of the Southern Carpathians, in Romania. To our knowledge, this is the first study showing significant differences in yield and composition in valuable compounds from the buds and needles of P. mugo from three populations from the same mountain group in Romania. The results of this study are useful for identifying the geographical area that can be successfully exploited for the expansion of new plantations and thus increasing the productivity of target compounds for the pharmaceutical and food industries.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Pinus mugo Samples, Fungi Strains, and Culture Media

The dwarf mountain pine samples (buds and needles) were collected in May 2021 from three mountain areas (one representative sample for each location), as follows: Cindrel-Iujbea 45°34′45.9′′ N, 23°48′43.3′′ E; Făgăraș-Viștea 45°36′10.9″ N, 24°44′9.5″ E, and Cozia-Rotunda 45°17′49′′ N, 24°13′26′′ E. The characterization of the harvesting areas is presented in Table 1. The samples were identified, noted, and stored within CCBIA from L. Blaga University, Sibiu, Romania. The scoring was performed as follows: Cindrel-Iujbea/buds (CIB), Cindrel-Iujbea/needles (CIN); Făgăraș-Viştea/buds (FVB), Făgăraș-Viştea/needles (FVN), Cozia-Rotunda/buds (CRB), Cozia-Rotunda/needles (CRN).
Stems and culture media used for antimicrobial assessment were: Candida albicans 2231—yeast, Cryptococcus neoformans 223, Penicillium chrysogenum 1004, Aspergillus flavus 1082 (CCBIA collection from L. Blaga University, Sibiu, Romania), Czapek Dox broth, Czapek Dox agar (Sigma-Aldrich GmbH, Taufkirchen, Germany).
The samples were stored at the Biotechnologies and Food Engineers Research Center (CCBIA) within the Agricultural Sciences, Food Industry, and Environmental Protection Faculty/ULB Sibiu, receiving the following registration number: 225/1-225/6.

2.2. Chemical and Reagents

The chemicals and reagents involved in the extraction process were: 99.8% methanol (CH3OH), Folin–Ciocâlteu reagent, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH—C18H12N5O6), Trolox (C14H18O4), metaphosphoric acid (HPO3), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO—C2H6OS), 7.5% sodium carbonate (Na₂CO₃), Whatman filter paper with a pore size of 15 µm, gallic acid (C7H6O5), and quercetin (C15H10O7) from Sigma-Aldrich GmbH, Germany; sodium nitrite (NaNO2), 10% aluminum chloride hexa-hydrate (AlCl3·6H2O), sodium hydroxide (NaOH) 1 M, glacial acetic acid (CH₃COOH), and ascorbic acid (C6H8O6) from Honeywell Fluka.

2.3. Extraction Procedure

After harvest, the buds and needles of P. mugo were dried in the incubator at a temperature of 45 °C for 10 days (until constant mass). The samples were crushed to a granularity between 100 and 500 µm and stored in the dark at a temperature of 10 °C ± 1 °C. Accurately weighed, 10 g of each sample was refluxed three times in 100 mL of 80% methanol for 4 h. The samples were filtered through a filter paper with a porosity of 15 µm, using a vacuum pump, concentrated in a rotary evaporator, and stored at 4 °C for analysis.
In order to determine the total polyphenols, flavonoids, and antioxidant activity, methanol extracts were used (5 mg/mL methanol 80% (w/v). For the assessment of the antifungal activity, aqueous extracts were prepared (0.25 mg extract/5 mL distilled water w/v).

Extraction Procedure for GC/MS

For GC/MS analysis, 500 mg of plant powder was subjected to extraction in an Erlenmeyer beaker fitted with a rodded stopper, 3 times, with 10 mL of methanol, for 15 min, at 500 rpm. The organic extract was filtered on filter paper and concentrated to 1 mL.

2.4. Identification and Quantification of Volatile Compounds by the GC/MS Method

The main volatile compounds present in P. mugo extracts were analyzed by gas chromatography coupled with an Agilent GC 6890-MS 5973N mass spectrometry device (Santa Clara, CA, USA) and a DB-5 capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 µm thick, J&W Scientific, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
The obtained extracts were filtered through a 0.5 μm microporous polytetrafluoroethylene membrane and then 1 μL of the filtered extract was injected directly with a part ratio of 1:10. The carrier gas was helium (He, 99.999%) at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min.
The column temperature range used for the separation of volatile compounds increased from 40 °C (maintained for 4 min) to 120 °C at a rate of 6 °C/min, then to 180 °C for 6 min with a rate of 8 °C/min, and finally to 220 °C for 6 min. Injector and detector temperatures were set at 230 °C and 250 °C.
The identification of the target compounds was performed by comparing their mass spectra with those listed in the Wiley 275 library. Furthermore, the experimental values of the retention indices (IR) were determined using the automated mass spectral deconvolution and identification system (AMDIS, ver. 2). Mass spectra were acquired in electron ionization (EI) mode (70 eV) in the range m/z 40–450. Samples were injected by an automatic liquid sampler (1 mL; split mode, 1:30).

2.5. Determination of Total Phenolic Content (TPC)

The total polyphenol concentration was measured by spectrophotometry using the modified Folin–Ciocâlteu method [45]. A volume of 1.58 mL of distilled water and 100 µL of Folin–Ciocâlteu reagent were added to 20 µL of methanol extract. Subsequently, 300 µL of 20% sodium carbonate was added, the samples being kept for 2 h in the dark at room temperature. The reading was performed on the spectrophotometer (UV-1900 SHIMADZU spectrophotometer, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) at a wavelength of 765 nm, in the presence of a control sample defined by the same reagents, except the extract. The calibration curve was performed, and gallic acid was used as a standard. The total polyphenol content was expressed in gallic acid equivalent/g of dry extract (DE), the determinations being performed in triplicate.

2.6. Determination of Total Flavonoid Content (TFC)

The total flavonoid content was determined based on the method used by Al-Rifai et al. [46], slightly modified. Briefly, 5 mL aqueous extract was homogenized with 0.3 mL of 5% NaNO2 solution and incubated in the dark. After 5 min, 0.5 mL of 10% AlCl3⋅6H2O solution was added and the reaction mixture was kept in the dark for another 15 min. After the complete reaction, 2 mL of 1 M NaOH and distilled water were added to a total volume of 10 mL. The absorbance was read at a wavelength of 510 nm, the total flavonoid content being expressed in mg equivalent to quercetin/gram of extract.

2.7. Assessment of Antioxidant Activity

Evaluation of antioxidant activity was performed using the slightly modified spectrophotometric method [47], which involves the use of 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) to evaluate the properties of compounds to remove free radicals or their ability to donate hydrogen. From the methanol stock solution of DPPH (24:100), the working solution was prepared in a ratio of 10 mL stock solution and 90 mL methanol. For 35 min, 25 µL of each sample was allowed to react with 175 µL DPPH working solution at 22 °C, in the dark.
The absorbance was read at a 515 nm wavelength with the UV-1900 SHIMADZU spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). Distilled water was used as a control. The results were expressed as milligrams of Trolox equivalent per gram of DE (mg TE/g DE).
The inhibition percentage (I) was calculated according to the equation
%   I = Ab     Aa Ab × 100 ,
where Ab is the absorbance of the control, and Aa is the absorbance of the reaction between the sample and the radicals.

2.8. Identification of Ascorbic Acid

For the assessment of the ascorbic acid (AsA) content in buds and needles of P. mugo by the slightly modified HPLC method proposed by Meos et al. [48], the equipment Smartline, KNAUER GmbH Germany, equipped with a PDA detector, quaternary pump, automatic injection system, and C18 chromatographic columns, was used. The mobile phase, eluent A, consisted of a solution of water/acetic acid (95/5 v/v), and eluent B of acetonitrile/water/acetic acid (100/95/5, v/v/v). For extraction, 10 g of needle and bud powder, respectively, was homogenized with metaphosphoric acid/distilled water (3:100 v/v) and glacial acetic acid/distilled water (8:100 v/v) for 45 min, in the dark. The supernatant obtained after settling and filtration was used in the determination of AsA. A volume of 10 µL of each sample was injected into the chromatographic column and eluted with the mobile phase for 15 min at 30 °C at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The obtained values were expressed in mg/100 g DE.

2.9. Evaluation of Antifungal Activity

Antifungal activity was determined by the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) method using diffusion discs. P. mugo extracts were diluted to 25% in DMSO, followed by five successive dilutions, resulting in the following final concentrations: 1000 µg/mL, 750 µg/mL, 500 µg/mL, 250 µg/mL, 125 µg/mL. The strains of C. albicans 2231, C. neoformans 223, P. chrysogenum 1004, A. flavus 1082 were activated for 24 h in liquid culture medium, Czapek Dox broth, at a temperature of 25 °C, and then brought to a concentration of 0.5 McFarland by spectrophotometric reading. Pre-prepared fungal strains were inoculated into Petri dishes with Czapek Dox agar culture medium. Sterile discs of 6 mm in diameter were placed on the culture medium, and 10 µL of diluted extract was pipetted onto each disc. The cultures were incubated at 25 °C for 72 h. The lowest concentration of P. mugo extract that was able to inhibit fungal growth was considered the MIC. DMSO was used as a negative control and Posaconazole as an antifungal.

2.10. Multivariate Analysis

The main approach of multivariate statistical analysis was based on principal component analysis (PCA) to explain the significant associations between quality parameters, total phenolic compound content, and volatile organic compound (VOC) data. Pearson correlations (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01) were used to identify correlations between all variables included in the dataset. All statistical analyzes were performed using Addinsoft XLSTAT software, version 2014.5.03 (Addinsoft Inc., New York, NY, USA).

3. Results

GC/MS analysis showed a varied accumulation of volatile compounds in P. mugo bud and needle extracts (Table 2). The most significant values were obtained in the case of the compound δ-3-carene, which was identified in buds at values between 19.66% and 21.42%, and in needles at values between 18.28% and 20.94%, the highest percentage being specific to the CIB samples. Another valuable compound identified in the samples was α-pinene, which ranged from 14.35% to 16.05% in buds and from 15.27% to 16.31% in needles, the FVN samples being characterized by the highest percentage. The volatile compound germacrene D was found in values between 8.93% and 12.14% in buds and between 7.81% and 12.13% in needles, and the trans-caryophyllene compound was present in values between 5.66% and 8.44% in buds and between 6.32% and 8.12% in needles.
Regarding the accumulation of other compounds, they were at subunit values (sabinene, camphene, octanal) or around 1–3%, with a definite accumulation of α-hummulene (2.19–3.44%), β-myrcene (1.45–2.31%), or α-pinene (1.91–3.38%).
Terpenic compounds varied according to their chemical structure as follows: α-terpenyl acetate was identified in a variable percentage of 1.49–2.12% in buds and 1.56–1.98% in needles, α-terpinolene at 5.23–6.12% and 4.57–6.02% in buds and in needles, respectively. α-Terpinene was identified in bud extracts in an amount of 0.19–1.01% and in needles at 0.38–1.13%, α-terpineol was in the range of 0.11–0.31% in buds and between 0.16% and 0.34% in needles, and terpinene-4-ol was identified at values of 0.21–0.71%. Hexanal and 3-methyl-1-butanol were identified at a value of 0.01% only in samples from Cindrel-Iujbea, and 2-methyl-1-butanol nerolidol was identified only in FVN samples. Linalool acetate was not detected in the buds and needles of Cindrel-Iujbea and needles of Cozia-Rotunda. Myrtenol was absent in FVB and CRN samples. Bornyl acetate was present in all samples, with values between 2.09% and 4.55% in needles and 3.44% and 4.01% in buds.
Multivariate analysis by Hotelling transformation (Karhunen–Loeve transformation) was applied to reduce the number of variables to the most representative [49]. Based on the aromatic profile of the bud and needle extracts from the three mountainous areas, statistical models were built in which the main components were grouped, while maintaining the maximum possible variation. The analysis of the PCA from the bud and needle extracts (Figure 1) showed a separation of the samples depending on the area of origin, CIN, FVB, and CRN being located on the positive semiaxes (Figure 1a). Among these samples, defined by terpinene-4-ol, 1-propanol, δ-cadinene, β-myrcene, and phenolic compounds, CRN was located in the first quadrant, far apart from the other samples. The CIN sample was located near the intersection of the third and fourth quadrants, contributed by α-terpineol, sabinene, α-terpenyl acetate, and trans-caryophyllene. Nearby, in the third quadrant, was located CIB, richer in aromatic compounds such as 1-hexanol, β-pinene, δ-3-carene, α-terpinolene, etc. Germacrene D, a-hummulene, α-pinene, α-cadinene, 2-methyl-1-butanol, nerolidol, and other compounds predominated in the needle extracts harvested from Făgăraş-Viștea and buds from Cozia-Rotunda, with samples located in the second quadrant, in the negative semiaxis (Figure 1b).
Even though the investigated metabolites are qualitatively similar, there was a noticeable quantitative variation in VOCs across the different geographical locations. There was a wide variation in the quantity of several compounds in P. mugo across the three studied locations. Based on these observations, we used the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy test (KMO), generated by PCA, to identify the first nine most important VOCs with greater differentiation power, with which we investigated the differences in the ratios of VOCs in the studied blends of P. mugo extracts (Figure 2).
To identify a model for characterizing the overlapping bud and needle sources of P. mugo following PCA analysis, the multivariate analysis was supplemented by cluster analysis that minimized variation within a group and identified the set of homogeneous groups. Thus, the segmentation analysis highlighted two clusters, a similar chemical and isotopic composition being highlighted for the bud and needle samples from Cozia-Rotunda and Făgăraș-Viştea, compared to the buds and needles from Cindrel-Iujbea (Figure 3).

3.1. Determination of Total Phenolic Content (TPC) and Total Flavonoid Content (TFC) and Evaluation of Antioxidant Activity

Following the determinations carried out, a series of significant values of polyphenols and flavonoids were established, which impress on the collected samples remarkable antioxidant qualities. According to the data presented in Table 3, the polyphenols ranged from 46.77 ± 0.3 mg GAE/g to 77.99 ± 0.5 mg GAE/g for P. mugo bud extracts and from 55.53 ± 0.3 mg GAE/g to 68.23 ± 0.4 mg GAE/g for needle extracts.
The determinations were supplemented by results on the total flavonoid concentration, where values between 24.90 ± 0.1 mg QE/g and 54.78 ± 0.3 mg QE/g were identified for bud extracts and values between 26.89 ± 0.2 mg QE/g and 45.55 ± 0.2 mg QE/g for needle extracts.

3.2. Identification and Quantification of Ascorbic Acid and Evaluation of Antioxidant Activity

Following the determinations performed by the HPLC method, AsA was identified in the extracts derived from both buds and needles of P. mugo (Figure 4). AsA was found in lower amounts in buds, for which the values recorded ranged from 1.33 mg/100 g DW to 2.45 mg/100 g DW, while in needles, the values reached up to 27.34 mg/100 g DW. The most significant values of AsA were found in the FVN samples (27.34 mg/100 g DW), followed by CIN (25.67 mg/100 g DW), and the lowest was identified in samples from Cozia-Rotunda (12.21 mg/100 g DW). The antioxidant activity was at DPPH values (IC50) between 10.7 ± 0.12 µg/mL and 13.2 ± 0.23 µg/mL, the most significant results being observed for CRB samples.

3.3. Antifungal Activity

In our study, the Posaconazole antifungal presented very good activity against C. albicans 2231, C. neoformans 223, and A. flavus 1082 (0.125 µL/mL), having no effect on the strain of P. chrysogenum. The assessment of antifungal activity revealed that the mold strain of P. chrysogenum showed sensitivity to extracts from P. mugo needles at a 0.125 µL/mL concentration, and bud extracts did not induce any inhibition of fungal growth. In comparison, A. flavus 1082 showed sensitivity to both bud extracts (0.25 µL/mL) and needle extracts (0.125 µL/mL).
The inhibitory effects of the tested extracts were null against C. neoformans strain 223, except for the needle extract from Făgăraș-Viştea, which showed a minimum level of inhibition at a maximum concentration of 1 µL/mL (Table 4).

4. Discussion

Even if the geographical locations where the buds and needles of P. mugo were collected are located at a distance from urban settlements, the possibility of anthropogenic influences exists, triggering the synthesis of some volatile isoprenoids. The reasons for the heterogeneity of dwarf mountain pine monoterpene chemistry are not well known, and genetic and environmental variables might have different impacts on the composition of monoterpenes. For instance, individual monoterpenes, such as δ-3-carene (the dominant constituent), myrcene, limonene, and terpinolene, are known to have different degrees of heritability and are mainly determined by genetic factors, while α-pinene (the second most dominant constituent) and β-pinene are more dependent on environmental variables [21,50], these influences being observed in the variability of the present studied compounds. A higher value (27.8%) of δ-3-carene was identified in P. mugo needles from a natural population in “Bjeshkët e Nemuna” National Park, Kosovo [20]. However, it is relevant to mention in this context that the amount of monoterpenes varies depending on the plant part and the phenological stage [51]. Understanding the differences in VOC composition between closely related plant species could lead to a better understanding of the function of VOCs and could provide insights into the mechanisms underlying resistance.
Phenolic compounds have always been a benchmark in the chemical characterization of plant extracts, including conifers, with the aim of discovering alternative natural sources to commercial antioxidants. To date, the antioxidant activity of various pine species has been reported [25,33,37,52,53,54,55]. Grassmann et al. [30] reported the good antioxidative activity of the essential oil from P. mugo when evaluated in lipophilic environments. In another important study, among several conifer-derived essential oils, the best antioxidant activity was reported by Garzoli et al. [31] for P. mugo. In our study, the most significant values of TPC, TFC, and DPPH were obtained in the case of extracts from buds harvested from the Cozia-Rotunda area. Studies in other areas have shown lower [25] or higher values [33] than those shown by bud and needle extracts of P. mugo from Romanian populations.
AsA is a low-molecular-weight biochemical with essential antioxidant properties in humans. Although, until now, considerable differences in the bioavailability of synthetic and food-derived vitamin C have not been highlighted, an important number of epidemiological studies and meta-analyses indicate a decrease in the incidence of chronic diseases as a result of dietary vitamin C intake [56]. Raal et al. [57] determined, for several conifer species, a variation in AsA in the fresh samples between 0.1 × 10−3% and 15 × 10−3%, values significantly lower compared to those determined in the samples collected from Făgăraș-Viștea and Cindrel-Iujbea. In our study, HPLC determination indicated that AsA are found in the largest amount in FVN samples, which indicates them as an emerging alternative in relieving oxidative stress. It is worth noting here that a recent study reported the higher antioxidant potential of the organic and hydroethanolic extracts obtained from needles of Pinus nigra J.F. Arnold in comparison with isolated phenolic compounds and diterpenes, suggesting the synergic antioxidant activity of phytochemicals [58].
The antifungal activity of the P. mugo extracts shown in Table 4 may be due to the high content of δ-3-carene. A relatively recent study showed that δ-3-carene effectively inhibited the growth of the postharvest pathogen Penicillium expansum. Moreover, the essential oil of Pinus ponderosa Douglas ex P. Lawson & C. Lawson, with content of 7.9% β-pinene, has been shown to be highly effective against Fusarium culmorum, F. solani, and F. poae [59]—hence the possibility of exploiting these biochemicals and plants with high content of this VOC for the development of environmentally friendly pathogen control practices [60]. In our study, CIN samples with the highest content of β-pinene inhibited the growth of P. chrysogenum and A. flavus 1082 at the lowest concentration of 125 µg/mL. The studies carried out by Scalas et al. [61] showed good inhibitory activity for Pinus sylvestris L., especially in combination with itroconazole, while Mačionienė et al. [62] showed that the 1% (v/v) essential oil of P. sylvestris has no antimicrobial activity. It is important to emphasize that the number of studies that evaluate the antifungal potential of P. mugo extracts is very limited [25,38]. Thus, the results reported in our study are significant and complete the picture of the antifungal potential of P. mugo extracts.
The differences determined regarding the content of volatile compounds and the antioxidant and antifungal capacity of the P. mugo buds and needles extracts can be attributed to the variety of biotic and abiotic factors in the three mountain massifs of the Southern Carpathians. On the other hand, this study can be an important starting point in the application of genetic engineering techniques and genome selection to improve economic characteristics, especially in the production of chemical compounds of interest.

5. Conclusions

The results reported by this study demonstrate that the geographical location influences the chemical composition of P. mugo extracts and present a new image of the bioactive qualities of plants that grow in various mountainous areas of Romania. The determinations performed via GC/MS methods identified a series of volatile compounds, the most significant amounts being represented by δ-3-carene, α-pinene, germacrene-D, D-limonene, and trans-caryophyllene, but also by terpene compounds. A similar chemical composition was highlighted for the bud and needle samples from Cozia-Rotunda and Făgăraș-Viştea. Polyphenols were found in amounts that support their use in the treatment of various diseases, the most important values being determined in the extracts from the buds harvested from Cozia-Rotunda. Flavonoids and vitamin C, in accordance with antioxidant activity, led to the establishment of a profile with important medicinal and nutritional properties. P. mugo could constitute an important reserve of dietary supplements and phytochemicals, useful in the treatment of inflammatory diseases and the respiratory system; it could be exploited for the identification of unique chemical compounds with antimicrobial activity and used in the food industry as a source of additives, flavorings, and preservatives. Lastly, these results suggest the importance of the growth/culture medium for the improvement of and capitalization on the chemical composition of P. mugo extracts and may constitute baseline data in subsequent research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.I.P., E.L., F.G.A., L.C.S., N.A.Ș. and O.R.B.; methodology, D.I.P., E.L. and O.R.B.; investigation, D.I.P., E.L., O.R.B., F.G.A., L.C.S. and N.A.Ș.; resources, O.R.B.; data curation, D.I.P., E.L. and O.R.B.; writing—original draft preparation, D.I.P., O.R.B. and F.G.A. and N.A.Ș.; writing—review and editing, E.L., O.R.B., F.G.A., L.C.S. and N.A.Ș.; visualization, O.R.B.; project administration, O.R.B.; funding acquisition, O.R.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This activity was carried out through the Core Program, carried out with the support of the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitalization, project no. PN 19110302, “Research on variation trends specific to stable isotopes in different tree species: deepening of fractionation mechanisms and interconnected chemical processes on the soil-water-plant chain”, a grant from the Romanian Ministry of Education and Research, CNCS—UEFISCDI, project number PN-III-P1-1,1-PD-2019 -0325, within PNCDI III and Program 1—Development of the national research and development system, Subprogram 1.2—Institutional performance—Projects to finance excellence in RDI, Contract No. 19PFE/30.12.2021. N.A.Ş. gratefully acknowledges the support obtained through project number PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2020-0620, within PNCDI III, a grant from the Romanian Ministry of of Education and Research, CNCS–UEFISCDI.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Farjon, A.; Filer, D. An Atlas of the World’s Conifers: An Analysis of Their Distribution, Biogeography, Diversity, and Conservation Status; Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2013; ISBN 978-90-04-21180-3. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jin, W.-T.; Gernandt, D.S.; Wehenkel, C.; Xia, X.-M.; Wei, X.-X.; Wang, X.-Q. Phylogenomic and Ecological Analyses Reveal the Spatiotemporal Evolution of Global Pines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2022302118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tsaryk, I.; Didukh, Y.P.; Tasenkevich, L.; Waldon, B.; Boratyński, A. Pinus mugo Turra (Pinaceae) in the Ukrainian Carpathians. Dendrobiology 2006, 55, 39–49. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jørgensen, H. Online Database of the European Network on Invasive Alien Species—NOBANIS. Available online: www.nobanis.org (accessed on 10 July 2022).
  5. Coldea, G. Prodrome Des Associations Vegetales Des Carpates Du Sud-Est (Carpates Roumaines). Doc. Phytosociol. Nouv. Ser. 1991, 13, 317–539. [Google Scholar]
  6. Roșca, S.; Șimonca, V.; Bilașco, Ș.; Vescan, I.; Fodorean, I.; Petrea, D. The Assessment of Favourability and Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Pinus mugo in the Romanian Carpathians Using GIS Technology and Landsat Images. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. De Rigo, D.; San-Miguel-Ayanz, J.; Caudullo, G.; Durrant, T.H.; Mauri, A. (Eds.) European Atlas of Forest Tree Species; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2016; ISBN 978-92-79-36740-3.
  8. Parobeková, Z.; Bugala, M.; Kardoš, M.; Dovciak, M.; Lukáčik, I.; Saniga, M. Long-Term Changes in Dwarf Pine (Pinus mugo Turra) Cover and Growth in the Orava Beskid Mountains, Slovakia. Mt. Res. Dev. 2018, 38, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Krüssmann, G.; Krüssmann, G. Manual of Cultivated Conifers; Timber Press: Portland, OR, USA, 1985; ISBN 978-0-88192-007-9. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hamerník, J.; Musil, I. The Pinus mugo Complex & minus; Its Structuring and General Overview of the Used Nomenclature. J. For. Sci. 2008, 53, 253–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ferreira-Santos, P.; Zanuso, E.; Genisheva, Z.; Rocha, C.M.R.; Teixeira, J.A. Green and Sustainable Valorization of Bioactive Phenolic Compounds from Pinus By-Products. Molecules 2020, 25, 2931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Șandru, D. Identification and Quantification of Valuable Phenolic Compounds from Red Wines from Western Part of Romania. World J. Adv. Res. Rev. 2019, 2, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Neamtu, A.-A.; Szoke-Kovacs, R.; Mihok, E.; Georgescu, C.; Turcus, V.; Olah, N.K.; Frum, A.; Tita, O.; Neamtu, C.; Szoke-Kovacs, Z.; et al. Bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) Extracts Comparative Analysis Regarding Their Phytonutrient Profiles, Antioxidant Capacity along with the In Vivo Rescue Effects Tested on a Drosophila melanogaster High-Sugar Diet Model. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dziedziński, M.; Kobus-Cisowska, J.; Stachowiak, B. Pinus Species as Prospective Reserves of Bioactive Compounds with Potential Use in Functional Food—Current State of Knowledge. Plants 2021, 10, 1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Venditti, A.; Serrilli, A.M.; Vittori, S.; Papa, F.; Maggi, F.; Di Cecco, M.; Ciaschetti, G.; Bruno, M.; Rosselli, S.; Bianco, A. Secondary Metabolites from Pinus mugo Turra Subsp. Mugo Growing in the Majella National Park (Central Apennines, Italy). Chem. Biodivers. 2013, 10, 2091–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Adams, R.; Tashev, A. Composition of the Leaf Volatile Terpenoids of Pinus mugo Turra from Bulgaria Compared with Oils from Other Regions. Phytologia 2019, 101, 74–80. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ioannou, E.; Koutsaviti, A.; Tzakou, O.; Roussis, V. The Genus Pinus: A Comparative Study on the Needle Essential Oil Composition of 46 Pine Species. Phytochem. Rev. 2014, 13, 741–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Amri, I.; Hamrouni, L.; Hanana, M.; Gargouri, S.; Fezzani, T.; Jamoussi, B. Chemical Composition, Physico-Chemical Properties, Antifungal and Herbicidal Activities of Pinus halepensis Miller Essential Oils. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 2013, 29, 91–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fekih, N.; Allali, H.; Merghache, S.; Chaïb, F.; Merghache, D.; El Amine, M.; Djabou, N.; Muselli, A.; Tabti, B.; Costa, J. Chemical Composition and Antibacterial Activity of Pinus halepensis Miller Growing in West Northern of Algeria. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Dis. 2014, 4, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hajdari, A.; Mustafa, B.; Ahmeti, G.; Pulaj, B.; Lukas, B.; Ibraliu, A.; Stefkov, G.; Quave, C.L.; Novak, J. Essential Oil Composition Variability among Natural Populations of Pinus mugo Turra in Kosovo. SpringerPlus 2015, 4, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Mitić, Z.S.; Jovanović, S.Č.; Zlatković, B.K.; Nikolić, B.M.; Stojanović, G.S.; Marin, P.D. Needle Terpenes as Chemotaxonomic Markers in Pinus: Subsections Pinus and Pinaster. Chem. Biodivers. 2017, 14, e1600453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bojović, S.; Jurc, M.; Ristić, M.; Popović, Z.; Matić, R.; Vidaković, V.; Stefanović, M.; Jurc, D. Essential-Oil Variability in Natural Populations of Pinus mugo Turra from the Julian Alps. Chem. Biodivers. 2016, 13, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Graßmann, J.; Hippeli, S.; Spitzenberger, R.; Elstner, E.F. The Monoterpene Terpinolene from the Oil of Pinus mugo L. in Concert with α-Tocopherol and β-Carotene Effectively Prevents Oxidation of LDL. Phytomedicine 2005, 12, 416–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tsitsimpikou, C.; Petrakis, P.V.; Ortiz, A.; Harvala, C.; Roussis, V. Volatile Needle Terpenoids of Six Pinus Species. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2001, 13, 174–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Karapandzova, M.; Stefkov, G.; Cvetkovikj, I.; Stanoeva, J.P.; Stefova, M.; Kulevanova, S. Flavonoids and Other Phenolic Compounds in Needles of Pinus peuce and Other Pine Species from the Macedonian Flora. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2015, 10, 987–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Basim, E.; Basim, H. Chemical Composition, Antibacterial and Antifungal Activities of Turpentine Oil of Pinus sylvestris L. Against Plant Bacterial and Fungal Pathogens. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2013, 11, 2261–2264. [Google Scholar]
  27. Celiński, K.; Bonikowski, R.; Wojnicka-Półtorak, A.; Chudzińska, E.; Maliński, T. Volatiles as Chemosystematic Markers for Distinguishing Closely Related Species within the Pinus mugo Complex. Chem. Biodiv. 2015, 12, 1208–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ciuman, R.R. Phytotherapeutic and Naturopathic Adjuvant Therapies in Otorhinolaryngology. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2012, 269, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Basholli-Salihu, M.; Schuster, R.; Hajdari, A.; Mulla, D.; Viernstein, H.; Mustafa, B.; Mueller, M. Phytochemical Composition, Anti-Inflammatory Activity and Cytotoxic Effects of Essential Oils from Three Pinus spp. Pharm. Biol. 2017, 55, 1553–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Grassmann, J.; Hippeli, S.; Vollmann, R.; Elstner, E.F. Antioxidative Properties of the Essential Oil from Pinus mugo. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 7576–7582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Garzoli, S.; Masci, V.L.; Caradonna, V.; Tiezzi, A.; Giacomello, P.; Ovidi, E. Liquid and Vapor Phase of Four Conifer-Derived Essential Oils: Comparison of Chemical Compositions and Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Properties. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bakkali, F.; Averbeck, S.; Averbeck, D.; Idaomar, M. Biological Effects of Essential Oils—A Review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 446–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yesil-Celiktas, O.; Ganzera, M.; Akgun, I.; Sevimli, C.; Korkmaz, K.S.; Bedir, E. Determination of Polyphenolic Constituents and Biological Activities of Bark Extracts from Different Pinus Species: Biological Activities of Pine Bark Extracts. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2009, 89, 1339–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Süntar, I. Importance of Ethnopharmacological Studies in Drug Discovery: Role of Medicinal Plants. Phytochem. Rev. 2020, 19, 1199–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mármol, I.; Quero, J.; Jiménez-Moreno, N.; Rodríguez-Yoldi, M.J.; Ancín-Azpilicueta, C. A Systematic Review of the Potential Uses of Pine Bark in Food Industry and Health Care. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 88, 558–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Milić, N.; Milanović, M.; Četojević-Simin, D.; Malenčić, Đ.; Prvulović, D.; Pavkov, N.; Radulović, Z.; Milošević, N.; Rašković, A.; Mandić, A. Phytochemical Characterization and Effects on Cell Proliferation of Pinus nigra Arn. Bark. Arch. Pharm. 2021, 354, 2000416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kurti, F.; Giorgi, A.; Beretta, G.; Mustafa, B.; Gelmini, F.; Testa, C.; Angioletti, S.; Giupponi, L.; Zilio, E.; Pentimalli, D.; et al. Chemical Composition, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Essential Oils of Different Pinus Species from Kosovo. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2019, 31, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Felšöciová, S.; Vukovic, N.; Jeżowski, P.; Kačániová, M. Antifungal Activity of Selected Volatile Essential Oils against Penicillium sp. Open Life Sci. 2020, 15, 511–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dei Cas, L.; Pugni, F.; Fico, G. Tradition of Use on Medicinal Species in Valfurva (Sondrio, Italy). J. Ethnopharmacol 2015, 163, 113–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vitalini, S.; Iriti, M.; Puricelli, C.; Ciuchi, D.; Segale, A.; Fico, G. Traditional Knowledge on Medicinal and Food Plants Used in Val San Giacomo (Sondrio, Italy)—An Alpine Ethnobotanical Study. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 145, 517–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Constantinescu, G.; Haţieganu-Buruiană, E. Să Ne Cunoaştem Plantele Medicinale, Proprietăţile Lor Terapeutice Şi Modul de Folosire; Editura Medicală: Bucharest, Romania, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  42. Dumitru, E.; Dumitru, R. Terapia Naturistă. Incursiune În Farmacia Naturii; Editura Ştiinţifică: Bucharest, Romania, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  43. Vitalini, S.; Puricelli, C.; Mikerezi, I.; Iriti, M. Plants, People and Traditions: Ethnobotanical Survey in the Lombard Stelvio National Park and Neighbouring Areas (Central Alps, Italy). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 173, 435–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, T.S.C. Medicinal Plants: Culture, Utilization and Phytopharmacology; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; ISBN 978-0-367-39846-0. [Google Scholar]
  45. Olech, M.; Nowak, R.; Ivanova, D.; Tashev, A.; Boyadzhieva, S.; Kalotova, G.; Angelov, G.; Gawlik-Dziki, U. LC-ESI-MS/MS-MRM Profiling of Polyphenols and Antioxidant Activity Evaluation of Junipers of Different Origin. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Al-Rifai, A.; Aqel, A.; Al-Warhi, T.; Wabaidur, S.M.; Al-Othman, Z.A.; Badjah-Hadj-Ahmed, A.Y. Antibacterial, Antioxidant Activity of Ethanolic Plant Extracts of Some Convolvulus Species and Their DART-ToF-MS Profiling. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2017, 2017, 5694305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Stegăruș, D.I.; Lengyel, E.; Apostolescu, G.F.; Botoran, O.R.; Tanase, C. Phytochemical Analysis and Biological Activity of Three Stachys Species (Lamiaceae) from Romania. Plants 2021, 10, 2710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Meos, A.; Zaharova, I.; Kask, M.; Raal, A. Content of Ascorbic Acid in Common Cowslip (Primula veris L.) Compared to Common Food Plants and Orange Juices. Acta Biol. Crac. Ser. Bot. 2017, 59, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Gorunescu, F. Exploratory Data Analysis. In Data Mining; Intelligent Systems Reference Library; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; Volume 12, pp. 57–157. ISBN 978-3-642-19720-8. [Google Scholar]
  50. Sancho-Knapik, D.; Gil-Pelegrín, E.; Ferrio, J.P.; Alonso-Forn, D.; Martín-Sánchez, R.; dos Santos Silva, J.V.; Imanishi, J.; Peguero-Pina, J.J.; Sanz, M.Á. Changes in the Abundance of Monoterpenes from Breathable Air of a Mediterranean Conifer Forest: When Is the Best Time for a Human Healthy Leisure Activity? Forests 2022, 13, 965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hazrati, S.; Hosseini, S.J.; Ebadi, M.-T.; Nicola, S. Evolution of Phytochemical Variation in Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) Organs during Different Phenological Stages. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Guri, A.; Kefalas, P.; Roussis, V. Antioxidant Potential of Six Pine Species. Phytother. Res. 2006, 20, 263–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kim, S.; Kang, S.; Jeon, J.; Um, B. A Comparison of Pycnogenol® and Bark Extracts from Pinus Thunbergii and Pinus Densiflora: Extractability, Antioxidant Activity and Proanthocyanidin Composition. J. Med. Plants Res. 2012, 6, 2839–2849. [Google Scholar]
  54. Ustun, O.; Senol, F.; Kurkcuoglu, M.; Orhan, I.; Kartal, M.; Baser, K. Investigation on Chemical Composition, Anticholinesterase and Antioxidant Activities of Extracts and Essential Oils of Turkish Pinus Species and Pycnogenol. Ind. Crops Prod. 2012, 38, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Apetrei, C.L.; Tuchilus, C.; Aprotosoaie, A.C.; Oprea, A.; Malterud, K.E.; Miron, A. Chemical, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Investigations of Pinus cembra L. Bark and Needles. Molecules 2011, 16, 7773–7788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Carr, A.; Vissers, M. Synthetic or Food-Derived Vitamin C—Are They Equally Bioavailable? Nutrients 2013, 5, 4284–4304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Raal, A.; Nisuma, K.; Meos, A. Pinus sylvestris L. and Other Conifers as Natural Sources of Ascorbic Acid. J. Pharm. Pharmacogn. Res. 2018, 6, 89–95. [Google Scholar]
  58. Koutsaviti, A.; Toutoungy, S.; Saliba, R.; Loupassaki, S.; Tzakou, O.; Roussis, V.; Ioannou, E. Antioxidant Potential of Pine Needles: A Systematic Study on the Essential Oils and Extracts of 46 Species of the Genus Pinus. Foods 2021, 10, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Krauze-Baranowska, M.; Mardarowicz, M.; Wiwart, M.; Pobłocka, L.; Dynowska, M. Antifungal Activity of the Essential Oils from Some Species of the Genus Pinus. Z. Nat. C 2002, 57, 478–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Erland, L.A.; Bitcon, C.R.; Lemke, A.D.; Mahmoud, S.S. Antifungal Screening of Lavender Essential Oils and Essential Oil Constituents on Three Post-Harvest Fungal Pathogens. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2016, 11, 523–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Scalas, D.; Mandras, N.; Roana, J.; Tardugno, R.; Cuffini, A.M.; Ghisetti, V.; Benvenuti, S.; Tullio, V. Use of Pinus sylvestris L. (Pinaceae), Origanum vulgare L. (Lamiaceae), and Thymus vulgaris L. (Lamiaceae) Essential Oils and Their Main Components to Enhance Itraconazole Activity against Azole Susceptible/Not-Susceptible Cryptococcus neoformans Strains. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 18, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Mačionienė, I.; Čepukoit, D.; Šalomskienė, J.; Černauskas, D.; Burokienė, D.; Šalaševičienė, A. Effects of Natural Antimicrobials on Xanthomonas Strains Growth. Horticulturae 2021, 8, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Differentiation of bud and needle sources based on the compositional profile; (a) PCA plot illustrating differentiation of bud and needle sources based on the compositional profile. Colored symbols correspond to the 3 regions defined in this study. The first two principal axes explained approximately 69 % of the variance; (b) PCA plot showing the multivariate variation among the 3 different regions in terms of chemical compositional variables. Vectors show the contribution of each compositional variable to the overall distribution as well as their strength.
Figure 1. Differentiation of bud and needle sources based on the compositional profile; (a) PCA plot illustrating differentiation of bud and needle sources based on the compositional profile. Colored symbols correspond to the 3 regions defined in this study. The first two principal axes explained approximately 69 % of the variance; (b) PCA plot showing the multivariate variation among the 3 different regions in terms of chemical compositional variables. Vectors show the contribution of each compositional variable to the overall distribution as well as their strength.
Horticulturae 08 00952 g001
Figure 2. Mean amounts of the nine most frequent VOCs for classifying Pinus mugo buds and needles harvested from the mountainous areas Cindrel-Iujbea, Făgăraș-Viştea, Cozia-Rotunda in Romania, by using KMO.
Figure 2. Mean amounts of the nine most frequent VOCs for classifying Pinus mugo buds and needles harvested from the mountainous areas Cindrel-Iujbea, Făgăraș-Viştea, Cozia-Rotunda in Romania, by using KMO.
Horticulturae 08 00952 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of the clusters for bud and needle samples from Cindrel-Iujbea, Făgăraș-Viştea, Cozia-Rotunda.
Figure 3. Distribution of the clusters for bud and needle samples from Cindrel-Iujbea, Făgăraș-Viştea, Cozia-Rotunda.
Horticulturae 08 00952 g003
Figure 4. Quantification of ascorbic acid and antioxidant activity of bud and needle methanol extracts of Pinus mugo from three mountainous areas of Romania (Cindrel-Iujbea, Făgăraș-Viştea, Cozia-Rotunda).
Figure 4. Quantification of ascorbic acid and antioxidant activity of bud and needle methanol extracts of Pinus mugo from three mountainous areas of Romania (Cindrel-Iujbea, Făgăraș-Viştea, Cozia-Rotunda).
Horticulturae 08 00952 g004
Table 1. Harvest details in Romania.
Table 1. Harvest details in Romania.
Local HarvestLocation in the Southern CarpathiansAltitude (m)ClimateAverage Annual Temperatures (°C)Annual Average of Precipitation (mm3)Geological Structure
Cindrel-IujbeaSouthwestern 1750Temperate moderate4–6800–1400Crystalline shales
Făgăraș-VișteaCentral–eastern1800Temperate continental6–81100Crystalline shales
Cozia-RotundaCentral–southern1550Temperate moderate+31200Hard gneiss rocks
Table 2. Chemical composition of Pinus mugo bud and needle extracts from three mountainous areas in Romania (Cindrel-Iujbea, Făgăraș-Viştea, Cozia-Rotunda).
Table 2. Chemical composition of Pinus mugo bud and needle extracts from three mountainous areas in Romania (Cindrel-Iujbea, Făgăraș-Viştea, Cozia-Rotunda).
CompoundRIIons (m/z)Cindrel-Iujbea (%)Făgăraș-Viștea (%)Cozia-Rotunda (%)
BudsNeedlesBudsNeedlesBudsNeedles
Hexanal6.36944.56.1000.010.01----
1-Propanol7.14631.59.60--0.01--0.02
α-Pinene8.23693.121.13614.7715.2714.3516.3116.0515.99
Camphene8.91693.121.1366.785.964.136.325.984.27
Sabinene9.00377.93.1360.880.910.780.340.470.82
β-Pinene10.13841.93.1363.113.482.172.451.991,91
β-Myrcene11.00569.93.1361.451.762.122.312.171.99
Octanal12.12743.84.1281.010.920.230.410.160.17
δ-3-Carene13.89279.93.13621.4219.8320.7120.9419.6618.28
p-Cymene14.24391.191.341.10.920.181.23-0.45
D-Limonene15.89143.67.1686.785.964.136.325.984.27
Linalool acetate16.00893.121.196--0.120.11-0.17
2-Methyl-1-butanol nerolidol17.08757.70.88---0.01--
3-Methyl-1-butanol17.31955.77.800.010.01----
Germacrene D18.006105.121.2048.937.819.2210.1212.1412.13
α-Terpenyl acetate18.6243.121.1961.791.982.121.731.491.56
α-Terpinene18.71893.121.1361.010.990.191.130.450.38
Terpinene-4-ol18.90671.111.1540.210.370.710.320.220.71
α-Terpineol19.00559.93.1540.230.340.310.160.110.22
α-Terpinolene19.13679.121.1365.876.025.234.996.124.57
Myrtenol21.22279.108.1520.110.03-0.040.07-
Bornil acetate22.35695.136.1963.442.093.484.554.013.12
β-Copaene23.118119.161.2040.220.310.310.440.380.35
a-Hummulene24.93693.121.2042.192.312.453.113.273.44
α-Cadinene25.224161.189.2040.220.240.160.190.320.29
δ-Cadinene25.647105.161.2048.297.937.717.178.038.56
α-Cadinol26.05595.121.2225.635.154.945.96.186.57
Trans-caryophyllene28.16493.133.2047.887.928.448.125.666.32
Table 3. Total polyphenols and flavonoids in bud and needle methanol extracts of Pinus mugo harvested from the mountainous areas Cindrel-Iujbea, Făgăraș-Viştea, Cozia-Rotunda in Romania.
Table 3. Total polyphenols and flavonoids in bud and needle methanol extracts of Pinus mugo harvested from the mountainous areas Cindrel-Iujbea, Făgăraș-Viştea, Cozia-Rotunda in Romania.
Area of OriginExtractTPC *
(mg GAE/g ± SD)
TFC *
(mg QE/g ± SD)
TE *
mM/g DE ± SD *
Cindrel-IujbeaBuds46.77 ± 0.324.90 ± 0.1115.64 ± 9.1
Needles55.53 ± 0.336.34 ± 0.2124.32 ± 11.3
Făgăraș-VișteaBuds55.12 ± 0.337.10 ± 0.2124.21 ± 13.2
Needles68.23 ± 0.426.89 ± 0.2164.93 ± 15.2
Cozia-RotundaBuds77.99 ± 0.554.78 ± 0.3194.54 ± 11.8
Needles64.56 ± 0.245.55 ± 0.2155.71 ± 23.6
* TPC—total polyphenol content; GAE—gallic acid equivalent; TFC—total flavonoid content; QE—quercetin equivalent; DPPH—2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; TE—Trolox equivalent; SD—standard deviation.
Table 4. The minimum inhibitory concentration established for bud and needle aqueous extracts of Pinus mugo harvested from three mountainous areas of Romania (Cindrel-Iujbea, Făgăraș-Viştea, Cozia-Rotunda).
Table 4. The minimum inhibitory concentration established for bud and needle aqueous extracts of Pinus mugo harvested from three mountainous areas of Romania (Cindrel-Iujbea, Făgăraș-Viştea, Cozia-Rotunda).
StrainsMIC (µL/mL)
CIBCINFVBFVNCRBCRNPosaconazole
Candida albicans 2231 0.50.250.50.250.50.250.125
Cryptococcus neoformans 223 NENENE1.00NENE0.125
Penicillium chrysogenumNE0.125NE0.125NE0.125NE
Aspergillus flavus 1082 0.250.1250.250.1250.250.1250.125
DMSO negative controlNENENENENENENE
NE—non-inhibitory effect.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Popescu, D.I.; Lengyel, E.; Apostolescu, F.G.; Soare, L.C.; Botoran, O.R.; Șuțan, N.A. Volatile Compounds and Antioxidant and Antifungal Activity of Bud and Needle Extracts from Three Populations of Pinus mugo Turra Growing in Romania. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 952. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8100952

AMA Style

Popescu DI, Lengyel E, Apostolescu FG, Soare LC, Botoran OR, Șuțan NA. Volatile Compounds and Antioxidant and Antifungal Activity of Bud and Needle Extracts from Three Populations of Pinus mugo Turra Growing in Romania. Horticulturae. 2022; 8(10):952. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8100952

Chicago/Turabian Style

Popescu, Diana Ionela (Stegarus), Ecaterina Lengyel, Florian George Apostolescu, Liliana Cristina Soare, Oana Romina Botoran, and Nicoleta Anca Șuțan. 2022. "Volatile Compounds and Antioxidant and Antifungal Activity of Bud and Needle Extracts from Three Populations of Pinus mugo Turra Growing in Romania" Horticulturae 8, no. 10: 952. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8100952

APA Style

Popescu, D. I., Lengyel, E., Apostolescu, F. G., Soare, L. C., Botoran, O. R., & Șuțan, N. A. (2022). Volatile Compounds and Antioxidant and Antifungal Activity of Bud and Needle Extracts from Three Populations of Pinus mugo Turra Growing in Romania. Horticulturae, 8(10), 952. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8100952

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop