Next Article in Journal
Characterisation of the Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Seven Hyacinthus orientalis L. Cultivars: Insights into Cultivar Phylogeny
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Elicitors in Grapevine Defense: Impact on Volatile Compounds
Previous Article in Special Issue
Physiological, Biochemical, and Agronomic Trait Responses of Nigella sativa Genotypes to Water Stress
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Brassinolide Maximized the Fruit and Oil Yield, Induced the Secondary Metabolites, and Stimulated Linoleic Acid Synthesis of Opuntia ficus-indica Oil

by
Amira K. G. Atteya
1,*,
Rasha S. El-Serafy
2,
Khaled M. El-Zabalawy
3,
Abeer Elhakem
4 and
Esmail A. E. Genaidy
5
1
Horticulture Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Damanhour University, Damanhour 22516, Egypt
2
Horticulture Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
3
Environment and Bio-Agriculture Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11651, Egypt
4
Department of Biology, College of Sciences and Humanities, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
5
Pomology Department, National Research Centre, Giza 12622, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2022, 8(5), 452; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8050452
Submission received: 31 March 2022 / Revised: 14 May 2022 / Accepted: 14 May 2022 / Published: 18 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Production and Utilization of Oilseed Crops)

Abstract

:
Prickly pear plant is widely cultivated in arid and semi-arid climates. Its fruits are rich in polyphenols, proteins, vitamin C, minerals, fatty acids, and amino acids. The oil extracted from the seeds also has a significant proportion of linoleic acid (ω6) and might be employed as a therapeutic raw material. The potential of enhancing fruit yield, increasing bioactive compounds of the fruit pulp, and improving the unsaturated fatty acid content of prickly pear oilseed by using the foliar application of brassinolide as a plant growth regulator was the main goal of this study. Prickly pear plants were foliar sprayed with a brassinolide solution at concentrations of 0, 1, 3, and 5 mg L−1. The plant performance was significantly improved following brassinolide applications, as compared with untreated plants. The plants subjected to 5 mg L−1 application exhibited 183 and 188% stimulation in the fruit yield, and 167 and 172% in the seed yield for the first and second seasons, respectively. The highest concentration of phenolic, flavonoid, protein, vitamin C, and maximum antioxidant activity in the fruit pulp was observed following 5 mg L−1 brassinolide treatment. The oil yield has been increased by 366 and 353% following brassinolide at a 5 mg L−1 level over control plants. Linoleic, oleic, and palmitic acids are the major components in prickly pear seed oil. Brassinolide foliar spraying induced an alternation in the fatty acid profile, as linoleic and oleic acids exhibited 5 and 4% higher following 5 mg L−1 application as compared with untreated plants. In conclusion, the treatment of 5 mg L−1 brassinolide improved the growth and quality of prickly pear plants by boosting fruit and seed yields, increasing active component content in the fruit pulp, improving mineral content, and increasing oil production and linoleic acid proportion.

1. Introduction

Prickly pear (Opuntia ficus-indica L.) is a Cactaceae member that grows normally under arid and semi-arid conditions, as the species have a high level of ecological adaptability. Its fruits and stems have long been used for medicinal and cosmetic applications, as well as for fodder and natural color sources, but so far, the fresh fruits are the only part that is consumed in many countries [1]. Prickly pear fruit consists of pulp, peel, and seeds. Pulp is used in many industrial commodities, e.g., fruit juices, jams, syrups, and salad dressings [2]. The pulp is rich in many active ingredients, including polyphenols, flavonoids, sugars, proteins, vitamins, minerals, fatty acids, antioxidants, fibers, and amino acids [3]. The seeds, which account for 3 to 15% of the prickly pear fruit mass, are a waste material [4,5], despite their importance as a source of edible oils, where 1 kg of seed contains 98.8 g of oil [6]. The seeds are rich in polyphenols, proteins, polysaccharides, cellulose, hemicelluloses, minerals, and antioxidants [3,7,8]. In addition, they represent a rich source of oleic and linoleic acids (ω6), as well as other important polyunsaturated fatty acids [4]. Linoleic acid has a critical role in supporting heart health and reducing the hazard of coronary heart disease development [9]. The oil is employed in important pharmaceutical industries for the production of antimicrobial and antioxidant substances [10,11,12,13]; and cardioprotective, anti-inflammatory, anti-thrombotic, hypolipidemic, anti-arrhythmic, and anti-hyperglycemia materials [14,15]. It a healthy edible oil and one of the natural agents for food preservation [16], as well as for the manufacture of natural-based foods [17] with a long shelf life [18,19].
Prickly pear is regarded as a promising functional food due to global desertification and the ability of Opuntia spp. to tolerate drought [2]. However, cultivars; environmental conditions, such as the type of soil minerals; and the growth promoters and plant-growth regulators can affect the growth, productivity, and active ingredients content [20,21,22].
Brassinosteroids are a steroidal sixth group of phytohormones that are found across the plant kingdom and can regulate growth. It has been discovered that there are 70 analogs of them, including 24-epibrassinolide, brassinolide, and 28-homobrassinolide. Under field circumstances, brassinosteroids are stable [23]. Brassinosteroids activate a wide range of physiological processes, from single cells to the entire plant [24,25]. Hayat et al. [26] and Fathima et al. [27] reported that brassinosteroids have a significant role in increasing vegetable crops, cereals, fruit crop, and oilseed crop performance, as well as secondary metabolite synthesis. These improvements are due to their role in the performance of various physiologic processes, such as plant growth, development, cell division, and elongation; xylem differentiation; gene regulation; enzyme activation; nucleic acid and protein syntheses; photosynthesis; flowering; seed germination; fruit set; and maturation [24,26,28]. In addition, they provide resistance to various stress factors because of their antioxidative characteristics [23,26,29,30]. However, to protect humanity from health risks, all exogenous applications must be environmentally benign [31]. Brassinosteroids decrease cancer cell proliferation in humans [32] and reduce phytotoxic effects induced by pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides in this field, without damaging healthy cells [28,33].
Despite the importance of Opuntia ficus-indica L. plant and its oil as an important source of linoleic acid, there are no reports about the influence of brassinolide foliar application on the oil yield or oilseed fatty acid profile of Opuntia ficus-indica. Therefore, the current study aimed to assess the impact of exogenous application of brassinolide on the development, fruit yield, fruit active-ingredients content, oil yield, and oil fatty acid composition of Opuntia ficus-indica.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Location, Plant Source, and Layout

This investigation was performed at a private farm in EL-Behira governorate, Egypt, during the February–May period of the 2020 and 2021 seasons. Nine-year-old plants were used in this study. Uniform plants (vigor and size) were chosen for use in this experiment. The plants were grown at a spacing of 5 × 3 m (between rows × plant spacing). The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) in three replications, with each one consisting of five cladodes having the same height, thickness, vigor, number of buds, and orientation. The drip irrigation system was used, and all agricultural practices were performed according to normal agro-management procedures. Physical and chemical analysis of experimental soil was performed according to Jackson [34] and Cottenie et al. [35] methods, and the results are present in Table 1.

2.2. Preparation and Brassinolide Application

Prickly pear plants were foliar sprayed with brassinolide (Titan Biotech Ltd. Company, New Delhi, India) solutions at levels of 0, 1, 3, and 5 mg L−1 (4 L tree−1). During brassinolide solution preparation, tween-20 at 0.1% (v/v) was applied as a surfactant to ensure optimal penetration into cladodes tissues. Four applications of brassinolide were supplemented (on the 1st of February, March, April, and May). Untreated plants were foliar sprayed with distilled water supplemented with Tween 20 at the same time as brassinolide application.

2.3. Cladodes Parameters and Harvesting Date

Nine plants were randomly collected for each treatment (3 plants replicate−1), and the number of flowering cladodes plant−1, as well as the number of fruits cladode−1, was recorded. Harvesting dates were calculated as the number of days from the beginning of the treatments until the beginning of the fruit harvest.

2.4. Fruit Characteristics

Fruit length and width (cm), fresh fruit weight (g), pulp weight (g), peel weight (g), seeds weight (g), and juice weight (g) were estimated.

2.5. Fruit, Seed, and Oil Yields

Fruit yield plant−1 (kg), fruit yield hectare−1 (ton ha−1), seed yield plant−1 (kg), and seed yield hectare−1 (ton ha−1) were estimated. The oil (%) was estimated according to the method mentioned by A.O.A.C. [36], then oil yield plant−1 (L) and oil yield hectare−1 (L) were calculated.

2.6. GC–MS Analysis of the Seeds Oil

In order to identify the active ingredients of oil samples, GC–MS analysis was carried out using TRACE GC ultra-gas chromatographs (THERMO Scientific Corp., Waltham, MA USA) in combination with a THERMO mass spectrometer detector (ISQ Single Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer, THERMO Scientific Corp., Waltham, MA USA), equipped with a TG-WAX MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 m film thickness). The temperature program was as follows 140 °C was the temperature source; 210 °C was the temperature of the injector and detector. The initial column temperature was 140 °C for 1 min, raised to 160 °C at 6 °C/min, and was held for 1 min. Finally, it was held at 210 °C for 1 min. Helium was used as a carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1.

2.7. Chlorophyll Pigments Determination

Chlorophyll levels in cladodes were assessed according to Wintermans and Mats [37] at the harvest stage and presented in µg g−1. A fresh sample of 0.5 g was mixed with 15 mL of acetone (85%) and 0.5 g of calcium carbonate. The mixture was funneled through a glass funnel, and the residue was washed with acetone and diluted to 25 mL. The optical density was measured using a UV–VIS spectrophotometer at 662 nm for chlorophyll a (E.662) and 644 nm for chlorophyll b (E.644). Photosynthetic pigments were calculated using the following equation:
Chlorophyll a = 9.784 × E.0.662 − 0.99 × E.644
Chlorophyll b = 21.426 × E.644 − 4.65 × E.0.662

2.8. Protein and Vitamin C Determination

Total soluble protein (%) in the pulp extract was determined by the Folin and Ciocâlteu reagent, as described by Lowry et al. [38]. The vitamin C concentration (mg g−1) in the fruit pulp was estimated according to the method of Association of Official Analytical Chemists [36].

2.9. Polyphenols Estimation

The fruit pulp was oven-dried at 48 °C until it reached a consistent weight. A total of 10 g of dried samples was crushed and soaked in 50 mL of methanol (80%) and macerated at room temperature for 48 h. After removing the solvent, the extract was kept at 4 °C for polyphenol determination. The total phenolic content (TPC) was evaluated according to Singleton and Rossi [39] and reported in mg Gallic g−1. Total flavonoids were determined by using aluminum chloride colorimetric according to Kim et al. [40] and presented in mg Rutin g−1.

2.10. Antioxidant Activity (IC50) Determinations

The antiradical activity of pulp samples was assessed according to the method of Brand-Williams et al. [41], using 2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH), and presented as µg mL−1.

2.11. Minerals Estimation

Dried samples of 0.5 g were digested by using perchloric and sulfuric acids to evaluate the nutrient concentration. The P, K, Ca, and Mg nutrients were determined according to Jackson [34] and Cottenie et al. [35].

2.12. Statistical Analysis

The experimental design was a randomized complete block design (RCBD) in three replications. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted by using SAS software [42]. The Duncan test was used to compare the means within treatments at a 5% level of probability.

3. Results

3.1. Cladodes Characteristics and Harvesting Date

Brassinolide applications significantly enhanced the number of flowering cladodes per plant and the number of fruits per cladode of prickly pear plants (Figure 1) as compared with the untreated plants in both seasons. Both the numbers of flowering cladode per plant (261 and 273 for first and second seasons, respectively) and fruits per cladode (9 and 10 for first and second seasons, respectively) of prickly pear plants were significantly boosted by the higher level of brassinolide, as their values gradually increased with increasing brassinolide level. Subjected plants to brassinolide treatments produced their fruits earlier than untreated plants, as the treatment of 3 mg L−1 recorded the lowest harvest date, which reduced the growth period by 13.69 and 11.4 days for the first and second seasons, respectively, as compared with untreated plants (Figure 1).

3.2. Fruit Characteristics

Foliar application with brassinolide exhibited a significant improvement in fruit characteristics as compared with the control plants (Figure 1 and Figure 2). For both seasons, the traits of fruit length and width, fruit fresh weight, pulp, seed, and juice per fruit exhibited a significant increase with increasing the brassinolide level reaching the highest values when plants were received 3 mg L−1 treatment and decreasing after that, where fruit fresh weight was increased by 49.78 and 52.78% for both seasons, respectively. On the other hand, the 5 mg L−1 application presented the highest peel weight, as it recorded 36 and 40 g for the first and second seasons, respectively, against 34 and 36 g, which were obtained by control plants for both seasons.

3.3. Seed, Fruit, and Oil Yields

Seed, fruit, and oil yield values presented in Figure 3 and Figure 4 revealed that the outputs of prickly pear plants gradually increased when increasing brassinolide levels. In comparison to the control plants, the fruit yield plant−1 was increased by using 5 mg L−1 by 182.78 and 188.43% for the first and second seasons, respectively, resulting in a greater seed yield plant−1 production (166.58 and 171.91% for the first and second seasons, respectively) and oil plant−1 (366.08 and 353.19% for the first and second seasons, respectively). Consequently, significant increments were recorded for fruit yield ha−1, seed yield ha−1, and oil yield ha−1 traits. On the other hand, the lowest values were given by untreated plants in this regard.

3.4. GC–MS Analysis of the Seeds Oil

The total identified fatty acids percent in the oil of prickly pear seeds ranged from 96.10 to 98.98%. The unsaturated fatty acids percentage ranged from 80.05 to 84.03% (Table 2). The total saturated fatty acids percentage ranged between 13.60 and 14.92%. Linoleic, oleic, and palmitic acid are the major fatty acids detected by GC–MS analysis. Their respective percentages ranged from 59.09 to 62.05%, 20.49 to 21.37%, and 10.26 to 11.12%. The results also showed that linoleic acid was the most oil component. All brassinolide treatments increased linoleic acid content. The most pronounced effect was recorded with 5 mg L−1 brassinolide treatment, which recorded the maximum proportion of linoleic acid.
Figure 4. Oil (%), oil yield content (L plant−1), and oil yield (L ha−1) of Opuntia ficus-indica L. plant subjected to brassinolide foliar spray. Data are mean value ± SE. Bars with the same letters (lowercase for the first season and uppercase for the second season) are not significant at p ≤ 0.05 level.
Figure 4. Oil (%), oil yield content (L plant−1), and oil yield (L ha−1) of Opuntia ficus-indica L. plant subjected to brassinolide foliar spray. Data are mean value ± SE. Bars with the same letters (lowercase for the first season and uppercase for the second season) are not significant at p ≤ 0.05 level.
Horticulturae 08 00452 g004

3.5. Chlorophyll Pigments

Foliar application with brassinolide positively stimulated photosynthetic pigment production in prickly pear cladode, as 5 mg L−1 plants exhibited a raise of 37.25 and 39.83% for chlorophyll a and approximately 40% for chlorophyll b than untreated plants for both seasons, respectively (Figure 5).

3.6. Protein and Vitamin C Content

Foliar application with brassinolide enhanced protein and vitamin C content in prickly pear fruit pulp (Figure 5). In comparison with untreated plants, plants treated with 5 mg L−1 produced higher protein (33.9 and 36.7%) and vitamin C (32.35 and 35%) content for both seasons, as the untreated plants produced the lowest values in these regards.
Figure 5. Chlorophyll a (µg g−1), chlorophyll b (µg g−1), protein content (%), and vitamin C (mg g−1) of Opuntia ficus-indica L. plants subjected to brassinolide foliar spray. Data are mean value ± SE. Bars with the same letters (lowercase for the first season and uppercase for the second season) are not significant at p ≤ 0.05 level.
Figure 5. Chlorophyll a (µg g−1), chlorophyll b (µg g−1), protein content (%), and vitamin C (mg g−1) of Opuntia ficus-indica L. plants subjected to brassinolide foliar spray. Data are mean value ± SE. Bars with the same letters (lowercase for the first season and uppercase for the second season) are not significant at p ≤ 0.05 level.
Horticulturae 08 00452 g005

3.7. Phenolic, Flavonoid, and Antioxidant Activity (IC50)

The results in Figure 6 indicate that all brassinolide applications modified the proportion of total polyphenols and flavonoids in the fruit pulp. The maximum levels of polyphenols (85.33 and 89.15 mg gallic g−1) and flavonoids (41.98 and 43.86 mg rutin g−1) were obtained by treating plants with 5 mg L−1 brassinolide for both seasons. Foliar application with brassinolide significantly increased the antioxidant activity of fruit pulp, and the best treatment that maximized the antioxidant activity was the high level of brassinolide, i.e., 34.73 and 36.28 µg mL−1 against 49.6 and 50.8 µg mL−1, which obtained by control plants.

3.8. Minerals Content

The enhancement obtained in growth and yield characteristics was referred to as an increase in the nutrient content of pulp (Figure 7). Foliar spray with all brassinolide levels exhibited a significant effect on the Ca, Mg, P, and K contents of the fruit pulp. In this regard, the most pronounced effect was related to 5 mg L−1 brassinolide application, which recorded the maximum values of Ca (0.264 and 0.280 ppm), Mg (0.273 and 0.290 ppm), P (0.155 and 0.165%), and K (0.952 and 0.995%) for first and second seasons, respectively.

4. Discussion

Opuntia ficus-indica plays an important role in providing food for both humans and animals in the arid and semi-arid regions of South Africa [43], as well as worldwide; thus, its fruit and fodder production has increased [44].
The plants subjected to 3 mg L−1 brassinolide had the highest fruit fresh weight and characteristics, while 5 mg L−1 brassinolide minimized the number of days from treatment until the beginning of harvest and achieved the maximum number of flowering cladodes and fruits per cladode; fruit, seed, and oil yield; photosynthetic pigments; protein content; and vitamin C and element content. Brassinosteroids are involved in various processes in plant growth and development, such as differentiation, nucleic acid, and protein synthesis [45]; reproductive and vascular development; membrane polarization and proton pumping [46]; source/sink relationships; and modulation of stress [47]. Brassinolide, a brassinosteroid, stimulates cell division and growth in plants [48,49]. The fundamental mechanism of plant growth and development is cell elongation, which is influenced by a variety of environmental factors and phytohormones [50,51,52,53,54]. Brassinosteroid, as a plant hormone, regulates cell elongation, resulting in an increase in plant height. Brassinosteroids have been discovered to promote cell elongation by increasing gibberellin levels [55]. Moreover, brassinosteroids promote plant growth by activating the BRU1 and TCH4 genes, which encode the proteins xyloglucan and expansions, which cause cell-wall slackening [56,57]. These findings are consistent with those of Yu et al. [58] and Anuradha and Rao [59]. In this study, prickly pear plants exposed to brassinolide treatments revealed an increase in the chlorophyll content. Such results were obtained by Hayat et al. [26] on Lycopersicon esculentum, Bajguz and Czerpak [60] on Chlorella vulgaris Beijerinck, Swamy and Rao [61] on Pelargonium graveolens, Houimli et al. [62] on Capsicum annuum, and Shahid et al. [63] on Pisum sativum.
Brassinolide enhances plant growth, pollen germination, and pollen tube growth [64,65,66], which all contribute to the improvements in fruit traits, fruits, seeds, and oil yields of the prickly pear plant (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Brassinosteroids have an important role in reproductive growth regulation [67]. In addition, they stimulate the source/sink relationship via improving the mobilization and accumulation of assimilates in fruits [68]. Furthermore, brassinolide boosts the potential for sugar unloading from the phloem, modifies the sink strength by increasing its growth, and stimulates nutrient transport via the phloem [69]. The oil extracted from prickly pear seeds was increased by 375% following brassinolide at 5 mg L−1 level, compared to the oil obtained by control plants. The highest level of brassinolide significantly maximized the essential-oil content in geranium plants [61]. Brassinolide application doubled the amount of Mentha essential oil, as result that may be due to the plants’ innate genetic ability to produce higher essential oil yields being triggered [70]. Previous reports have proven that brassinosteroids boost the content of essential oils in a variety of plants [61,71,72]. Farooqi and Sharma [73] and Santoro et al. [74] reported that brassinosteroids can improve oil content and quality by affecting source/sink connections, as well as biochemical pathways and physiological processes that affect plant metabolism. Furthermore, as a result of the treatment, the oil analysis of prickly pear seeds was altered. Linoleic acid is the major fatty acid in the seeds and pulp of the prickly pear oil, followed by palmitic and oleic acids [6]. According to Ennouri et al. [75], the primary fatty acids found in prickly pear seed oil are C16:0, C18:0, C18:1, and C18:2. The unsaturated fatty acids concentration was 88.5% and 88.0% for Opuntia ficus-indica and Opuntia stricta, respectively, with an outstanding level of linoleic acid, up to 70%. Taoufik et al. [76] stated that oleic acid (20.5 g 100 g−1) and linoleic acid (62.3 g 100 g−1) make up 80–84% of the total fatty acids in cactus seed oil. Other fatty acids identified in tiny levels included palmitoleic (C16:1), arachidic (C20:0), and behenic (C22:0) acids.

5. Conclusions

The current report was performed to shed more light on the possibility of the positive influence of brassinolide foliar spray to enhance the growth; fruit, seed, and oil yields; and phytochemical content in the fruit of Opuntia ficus-indica L. plants. Foliar spray with brassinolide produced a significant (p ≤ 0.05) impact on the yields obtained from Opuntia ficus-indica L. plants. The higher level of brassinolide outperformed the other levels in terms of the aforesaid traits. Brassinolide at 5 mg L−1 was the more effective treatment in minimizing the harvesting date, increasing the oil yield, inducing the active ingredients in the fruit juice (total polyphenols, flavonoids, protein, and vitamin C, and nutrient content), and stimulating linoleic acid generation in the oil of Opuntia ficus-indica L. seeds.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K.G.A., R.S.E.-S. and E.A.E.G.; methodology, A.K.G.A., R.S.E.-S., K.M.E.-Z., A.E. and E.A.E.G.; software, A.K.G.A., R.S.E.-S., K.M.E.-Z., A.E. and E.A.E.G.; validation, A.K.G.A., R.S.E.-S., K.M.E.-Z., A.E. and E.A.E.G.; formal analysis, A.K.G.A., R.S.E.-S. and E.A.E.G.; investigation, A.K.G.A., R.S.E.-S. and E.A.E.G.; resources, A.K.G.A., R.S.E.-S., K.M.E.-Z., A.E. and E.A.E.G.; data curation, A.K.G.A., R.S.E.-S. and E.A.E.G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K.G.A., R.S.E.-S. and E.A.E.G.; writing—review and editing, A.K.G.A., R.S.E.-S. and E.A.E.G.; visualization, A.K.G.A., R.S.E.-S. and E.A.E.G.; supervision, A.K.G.A., R.S.E.-S. and E.A.E.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mobhammer, M.R.; Stintzing, F.C.; Carle, R. Cactus pear fruits (Opuntia spp.): A review of processing technologies and current uses. J. Prof. Assoc. Cactus Dev. 2006, 8, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  2. Snyman, H.A.; Fouche, H.J.; Avenant, P.L.; Ratsele, C. Frost sensitivity of Opuntia ficus−indica and O. robusta in a semiarid climate of South Africa. J. Prof. Ass. Cactus Dev. 2007, 9, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rabhi, A.; Falleh, H.; Limam, F.; Ksouri, R.; Abdelly, C.; Raies, A. Upshot of the ripening time on biological activities, phenol content and fatty acid composition of Tunisian Opuntia ficus-indica fruit. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2013, 12, 5875–5885. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhatt, M.R.; Nagar, P.S. Evaluation of physicochemical property and fatty acid composition of Opuntia elatior seed oil. J. Prof. Assoc. Cactus Dev. 2013, 15, 13–19. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chahdoura, H.; Barreira, J.C.; Barros, L.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Ferreira, I.C.; Isabel, C.F.; Achour, L. Seeds of opuntia spp. as a novel high potential by-product: Phytochemical characterization and antioxidant activity. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 65, 383–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ramadan, M.F.; Mörsel, J.-T. Oil cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica L.). Food Chem. 2003, 82, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jun, H.I.; Cha, M.N.; Yang, E.I.; Choi, D.G.; Kim, Y.S. Physicochemical properties and antioxidant activity of Korean cactus (Opuntia humifusa) cladodes. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2013, 54, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. El-Mostafa, K.; Kharrassi, Y.; Badreddine, A.; Andreoletti, P.; Vamecq, J.; El Kebbaj, M.S.; Latruffe, N.; Lizard, G.; Nasser, B.; Cherkaoui-Malki, M. Nopal Cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) as a source of bioactive compounds for nutrition, health and disease. Molecules 2014, 19, 14879–14901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Farvid, M.S.; Ding, M.; Pan, A.; Sun, Q.; Chiuve, S.E.; Steffen, L.M.; Willett, W.C.; Hu, F.B. Dietary linoleic acid and risk of coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Circulatio 2014, 130, 1568–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chougui, N.; Tamendjari, A.; Hamidj, W.; Hallal, S.; Barras, A.; Richard, T.; Larbat, R. Oil composition and characterization of phenolic compounds of Opuntia ficus-indica seeds. Food Chem. 2013, 139, 796–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Morales, P.; Ramírez-Moreno, E.; Sánchez-Mata, M.C.; Carvalho, A.M.; Ferreira, I.C. Nutritional and antioxidant properties of pulp and seeds of two xoconostle cultivars (Opuntia joconostle F.A.C. Weber ex Diguet and Opuntia matudae Scheinvar) of high consumption in Mexico. Food Res. Int. 2012, 46, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ramírez-Moreno, E.; Cariño-Cortés, R.; Cruz-Cansino, N.D.S.; Delgado-Olivares, L.; Ariza-Ortega, J.A.; Vanessa YelinaMontañez-Izquierdo, V.Y.; Hernández-Herrero, M.M.; Tomás Filardo-Kerstupp, T. Antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of cactus pear (Opuntia) seed oils. J. Food Qual. 2017, 2017, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Regalado-Rentería, E.; Aguirre-Rivera, J.R.; González-Chávez, M.M.; Sánchez-Sánchez, R.; Martínez-Gutiérrez, F.; Juárez-Flores, B.I. Assessment of extraction methods and biological value of seed oil from eight variants of prickly pear fruit (Opuntia spp.). Waste Biomass Valori. 2018, 11, 1181–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mobraten, K.; Haug, T.M.; Kleiveland, C.R.; Lea, T. Omega-3 and omega-6 PUFAs induce the same GPR120-mediated signalling events, but with different kinetics and intensity in Caco-2 cells. Lipids Health Dis. 2013, 12, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Berraaouan, A.; Ziyyat, A.; Mekhfi, H.; Legssyer, A.; Sindic, M.; Aziz, M.; Bnouham, M. Evaluation of antidiabetic properties of cactus pear seed oil in rats. Pharm. Boil. 2014, 52, 1286–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ozcan, B.; Esen, M.; Sangun, M.K.; Coleri, A.; Caliskan, M. Effective antibacterial and antioxidant properties of methanolic extrac of Laururs nobillis seed oil. J. Environ. Biol. 2010, 5, 637–641. [Google Scholar]
  17. Carovi’c-Stanko, K.; Orli’c, S.; Politeo, O.; Striki’c, F.; Kolak, I.; Milos, M.; Satovic, Z. Composition and antibacterial activities of essential oils of seven Ocimum taxa. Food Chem. 2010, 119, 196–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tajkarimi, M.M.; Ibrahim, S.A.; Cliver, D.O. Antimicrobial herb and spice compounds in food. Food Cont. 2010, 21, 1199–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Solórzano-Santos, F.; Miranda-Novales, M.G. Essential oils from aromatic herbs as antimicrobial agents. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012, 23, 136–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Atteya, A.K.G.; Albalawi, A.N.; El-Serafy, R.S.; Albalawi, K.N.; Bayomy, H.M.; Genaidy, E.A.E. Response of Moringa oleifera seeds and fixed oil production to vermicompost and npk fertilizers under calcareous soil con-ditions. Plants 2021, 10, 1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Genaidy, E.A.E.; Atteya, A.K.G.; Adss, I.A.A. Increase the economic value of the jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis) yield using evaluation of distinctive clones grown under the Egyptian environmental conditions. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2016, 12, 145–165. [Google Scholar]
  22. Atteya, A.K.G.; Genaidy, E.A.E.; Zahran, H.A. Chemical constituents and yield of Simmondsia chinensis plants as affected by foliar application of gibberellic acid and zinc sulphate. Biosci. Res. 2018, 15, 1528–1541. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ali, B.; Hayat, S.; Ahmad, A. 28-Homobrassinolide ameliorates the salt stress in chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 59, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Caño-Delgado, A.; Yin, Y.; Yu, C.; Vafeados, D.; Mora-García, S.; Cheng, J.C.; Nam, K.H.; Li, J.; Chory, J. BRL1 and BRL3 are novel brassinosteroid receptors that function in vascular differentiation in Arabidopsis. Development 2004, 131, 5341–5351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Saygideger, S.; Deniz, F. Efect of 24-epibrassinolide on biomass, growth and free proline concentration in Spirulina platensis (Cyanophyta) under NaCl stress. Plant Growth Regul. 2008, 56, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hayat, S.; Yadav, S.; Ali, B.; Ahmad, A. Interactive effect of nitric oxide and brassinosteroids on photosynthesis and the antioxidant system of Lycopersicon esculentum. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2010, 57, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fathima, M.S.A.; Johnson, M.; Lingakumar, K. Effect of crude brassinosteroid extract on growth and biochemical changes of Gossypium hirsutum L. and Vigna mungo L. J. Stress Physiol. Biochem. 2011, 7, 324–334. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sasse, J.M. Physiological Actions of Brassinosteroids: An Update. J. Plant. Growth Regul. 2003, 22, 276–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Asha, A.; Lingakumar, K. Effect of 24-epibrassinolide spray on vegetative growth, pigment composition and biochemical constituents of Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper (Blackgram). J. Global. Biosci. 2015, 4, 2007–2012. [Google Scholar]
  30. Helaly, M.N.; El-Hoseiny, H.M.; Elsheery, N.I.; Kalaji, H.M.; Santos-Villalobos, S.D.L.; Wróbel, J.; Hassan, I.F.; Gaballah, M.S.; Abdelrhman, L.A.; Mira, A.M.; et al. 5-aminolevulinic acid and 24-epibrassinolide improve the drought stress resilience and productivity of banana plants. Plants 2022, 11, 743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Thakur, M.; Sohal, B.S. Role of elicitors in inducing resistance in plants against pathogen infection: A review. ISRN Biochem. 2013, 2013, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Malikova, J.; Swaczynova, J.; Kolar, Z.; Strnad, M. Anticancer and antiproliferative activity of natural brassinosteroids. Phytochemistry 2008, 69, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xia, X.J.; Huang, Y.Y.; Wang, L.; Huang, L.F.; Yu, Y.L.; Zhou, Y.H.; Yu, J.Q. Pesticides induced depression of photosynthesis was alleviated by 24-epibrassinolide pretreatment in Cucumis sativus L. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2006, 86, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jackson, M.L. Methods of Chemical Analysis; Prentice Hall of India: New Delhi, India, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  35. Cottenie, A.; Verloo, M.; Kikens, L. Chemical Analysis of Plants and Soils; RUG Laboratory of Analytical and Agrochemistry: Gent, Belgium, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  36. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis, 12th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Washington, DC, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wintermans, J.F.G.M.; Mats, D.E. Spectrophtometeric characteristic of chlorophyll and their pheophytins in ethanol. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1965, 109, 448–453. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lowry, O.H.; Rosebrough, N.J.; Farr, A.L.; Randall, R.J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 193, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Singleton, V.L.; Rossi, J.A. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdicphosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1965, 16, 144–158. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kim, D.; Chun, O.; Kim, Y.; Moon, H.; Lee, C. Quantification of phenolics and their antioxidant capacity in fresh plums. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 6509–6515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, M.E.; Berset, C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. Lebensm. Wiss. Technol. 1995, 26, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User’s Guide; Release 6.03 Edition; SAS Institute: Cary, NC, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  43. Potgieter, J.P.; Mashope, B.K. Cactus pear (Opuntia spp.) germplasm conservation in South Africa. Acta. Hort. 2009, 811, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. El-Kossori, R.L.; Villaume, C.; El Boustani, E.; Sauvaire, Y.; Méjean, L. Composition of pulp, skin and seeds of prickly pears fruit (Opuntia ficus indica sp.). Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 1998, 52, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tanveer, M. Role of 24-Epibrassinolide in ınducing thermo-tolerance in plants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2019, 38, 945–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, J.; Jin, H. Regulation of brassinosteroid signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2007, 12, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Divi, U.K.; Krishna, P. Brassinosteroid: A biotechnological target for enhancing crop yield and stress tolerance. New Biotechol. 2009, 26, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Clouse, S.D.; Zurek, D. Molecular Analysis of Brassinolide Action in Plant Growth and Development; Cutler, H.G., Yokota, T., Adam, G., Eds.; In Brassinosteroids; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1991; pp. 122–140. [Google Scholar]
  49. Oh, M.H.; Clause, S.D. Brassinolide affects the rate of cell division in isolated leaf protoplasts of Petunia hybrida. Plant Cell Rep. 1998, 17, 921–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Eveland, A.L.; Jackson, D.P. Sugars, signalling, and plant development. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 63, 3367–3377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Vert, G.; Chory, J. Crosstalk in cellular signaling: Background noise or the real thing? Dev. Cell 2011, 21, 985–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. El-Serafy, R.S.; El-Sheshtawy, A.-N.A.; Atteya, A.K.; Al-Hashimi, A.; Abbasi, A.M.; Al-Ashkar, I. Seed priming with silicon as a potential to increase salt stress tolerance in Lathyrus odoratus. Plants 2021, 10, 2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Atteya, A.K.G.; Albalawi, A.N.; Bayomy, H.M.; Alamri, E.S.; Genaidy, E.A.E. Maximizing Leaves, Inflores-cences, and Chemical Composition Production of Moringa oleifera Trees under Calcareous Soil Conditions. Plants 2022, 11, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Atteya, A.K.; Albalawi, A.N.; Bayomy, H.M.; El Moataz Bellah, A.; Ghozlan, M.H.; Genaidy, E.A. Impact of planting density and soaking seeds in melatonin solution on yield, secondary products content and antimicrobial activity of lovage plant. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 2656–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tong, H.; Xiao, Y.; Liu, D.; Gao, S.; Liu, L.; Yin, Y.; Jin, Y.; Qian, Q.; Chu, C. Brassinosteroid regulates cell elongation by modulating gibberellin metabolism in rice. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 4376–4393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Felner, M. Recent progress in brassinosteroid research: Hormone perception and signal transduction. In Brassinosteroids: Bioactivity and Crop Productivity; Hayat, S., Ahmad, A., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 69–86. [Google Scholar]
  57. Cosgrove, D. Relaxation in a high stress environment: The molecular basis of extensible cell walls and enlargement. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 1031–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Yu, J.Q.; Huang, L.F.; Hu, W.H.; Zhou, Y.H.; Mao, W.H.; Ye, S.F.; Nogues, S. A role for brassinosteroids in the regulation of photosynthesis in Cucumis sativus. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55, 1135–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Anuradha, S.; Rao, S.S.R. Effect of brassinosteroids on salinity stress induced inhibition of seed germination and seedling growth of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Growth Regul. 2001, 33, 151–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bajguz, A.; Czerpak, R. Physiological and biochemical role of brassinosteroids and their structure activity relationship in the green alga Chlorella vulgaris Beijerinck (Chlorophyceae). Plant Growth Regul. 1998, 17, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Swamy, K.N.; Rao, S.S.R. Effect of 24-epibrassinolide on growth, photosynthesis, and essential oil content of Pelargonium graveolens (L.) Herit. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 56, 616–620. [Google Scholar]
  62. Houimli, S.M.; Denden, M.; Mouhandes, B.D. Effects of 24-epi-brassinolide on growth, chlorophyll, electrolyte leakage and proline by pepper plants under NaCl-stress. Eurasia. J. BioSci. 2010, 4, 96–104. [Google Scholar]
  63. Shahid, M.A.; Pervez, M.A.; Balal, R.M.; Mattson, N.S.; Rashid, A.; Ahmad, R.; Ayyub, C.M.; Abbas, T. Brassinosteroid (24-epibrassinolide) enhances growth and alleviates the deleterious effects induced by salt stress in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Aust. J. Crop. Sci. 2011, 5, 500–510. [Google Scholar]
  64. Vogler, F.; Schmalzl, C.; Englhart, M.; Bircheneder, M.; Sprunck, S. Brassinosteroids promote Arabidopsis pollen germination and growth. Plant Reprod. 2014, 27, 153–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Maita, S.; Sotomayor, C. The effect of three plant bioregulators on pollen germination, pollen tube growth and fruit set in almond [Prunus dulcis (Mill.) DA Webb] cvs. Non Pareil Carmel. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 18, 381–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Khamsuk, O.; Sonjaroon, W.; Suwanwong, S.; Jutamanee, K.; Suksamrarn, A. Effects of 24-epibrassinolide and the synthetic brassinosteroid mimic on chili pepper under drought. Acta Physiol. Plant 2018, 40, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kang, Y.Y.; Guo, S.S.R. Role of brassinosteroids on horticultural crops. In Brassinosteroids: A Class of Plant Hormone; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 143–192. [Google Scholar]
  68. Ozga, J.; Dennis, M. Hormonal interactions in fruit development. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2003, 22, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Brenner, M.L.; Cheikh, N. The role of hormones in photosynthate partitioning and seed filling. In Plant Hormones: Physiology, Biochemistry, and Molecular Biology, 2nd ed.; Davis, P.J., Ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995; pp. 649–670. [Google Scholar]
  70. Naeema, M.; Mohd, I.; Masidur, A.M.; Aftaba, T.; Masroor, M.; Khana, A.; Moinuddin. Brassinosteroid mediated enrichment in yield attributes, active constituents and essential oil production in Mentha arvensis L. Russ. Agric. Sci. 2012, 38, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Maia, N.B.; Bovi, O.A.; Zullo, M.A.T.; Perecin, M.B.; Granja, N.P.; Carmello, Q.A.C.; Robaina, C.; Coll, F. Hydroponic cultivation of mint and vetiver with spirostane analogues of brassinosteroids. Acta Hortic. (ISHS) 2004, 644, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Swamy, K.N.; Rao, S.S.R. Influence of 28-homobrassinolide on growth, photosynthesis metabolite and essential oil content of geranium [Pelargonium graveolens (L.) herit]. Am. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 3, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Farooqi, H.A.; Sharma, S. Effect of growth retardants on growth and essential oil content in Japanese mint. Plant Growth Regul. 1988, 7, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Santoro, M.V.; Nievas, F.; Zygadlo, J.; Giordano, W.; Banchio, E. Effects of growth regulators on biomass and the production of secondary metabolites in Peppermint (Mentha piperita) micropropagated in vitro. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Ennouri, M.; Evelyne, B.; Laurence, B.; Hamadi, A. Fatty acid composition and rheological behavior of prickly pear seed oils. Food Chem. 2005, 93, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Taoufik, F.; Zine, S.; El Hadek, M.; Hassani, L.M.I.; Gharby, S.; Harhar, H.; Matthaus, B. Oil content and main constituents of cactus seed oils Opuntia Ficus Indica of different origin in Morocco. Mediterr. J. Nutr. Metab. 2015, 8, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Number of flowering cladodes plant−1, number of fruits cladode−1, harvesting date, fruit length (cm), fruit width (cm), and fruit fresh weight (g) of prickly pear plant subjected to brassinolide foliar spray. Data are mean value ± SE. Bars with the same letters (lowercase for the first season and uppercase for the second season) are not significant at p ≤ 0.05 level.
Figure 1. Number of flowering cladodes plant−1, number of fruits cladode−1, harvesting date, fruit length (cm), fruit width (cm), and fruit fresh weight (g) of prickly pear plant subjected to brassinolide foliar spray. Data are mean value ± SE. Bars with the same letters (lowercase for the first season and uppercase for the second season) are not significant at p ≤ 0.05 level.
Horticulturae 08 00452 g001
Figure 2. Peel weight fruit−1 (g), pulp weight fruit−1 (g), seeds weight fruit−1 (g), and juice weight fruit−1 (g) of Opuntia ficus-indica L. plant subjected to brassinolide foliar spray. Data are mean value ± SE. Bars with the same letters (lowercase for the first season and uppercase for the second season) are not significant at p ≤ 0.05 level.
Figure 2. Peel weight fruit−1 (g), pulp weight fruit−1 (g), seeds weight fruit−1 (g), and juice weight fruit−1 (g) of Opuntia ficus-indica L. plant subjected to brassinolide foliar spray. Data are mean value ± SE. Bars with the same letters (lowercase for the first season and uppercase for the second season) are not significant at p ≤ 0.05 level.
Horticulturae 08 00452 g002
Figure 3. Seed yield plant−1 (kg), seed yield ha−1 (ton ha−1), fruit yield plant−1 (kg), and fruit yield ha−1 (ton ha−1) of Opuntia ficus-indica L. plant subjected to brassinolide foliar spray. Data are mean value ± SE. Bars with the same letters (lowercase for the first season and uppercase for the second season) are not significant at p ≤ 0.05 level.
Figure 3. Seed yield plant−1 (kg), seed yield ha−1 (ton ha−1), fruit yield plant−1 (kg), and fruit yield ha−1 (ton ha−1) of Opuntia ficus-indica L. plant subjected to brassinolide foliar spray. Data are mean value ± SE. Bars with the same letters (lowercase for the first season and uppercase for the second season) are not significant at p ≤ 0.05 level.
Horticulturae 08 00452 g003
Figure 6. Total phenolic (mg Gallic g−1), flavonoids (mg Rutin g−1), and the inhibition capacity of the radical DPPH (µg mL−1) of Opuntia ficus-indica L. plant subjected to brassinolide foliar spray. Data are mean value ± SE. Bars with the same letters (lowercase for the first season and uppercase for the second season) are not significant at p ≤ 0.05 level.
Figure 6. Total phenolic (mg Gallic g−1), flavonoids (mg Rutin g−1), and the inhibition capacity of the radical DPPH (µg mL−1) of Opuntia ficus-indica L. plant subjected to brassinolide foliar spray. Data are mean value ± SE. Bars with the same letters (lowercase for the first season and uppercase for the second season) are not significant at p ≤ 0.05 level.
Horticulturae 08 00452 g006
Figure 7. Ca (ppm), Mg (ppm), P (%), and K (%) of Opuntia ficus-indica L., as affected by brassinolide foliar spray. Data are mean value ± SE. Bars with the same letters (lowercase for the first season and uppercase for the second season) are not significant at p ≤ 0.05 level.
Figure 7. Ca (ppm), Mg (ppm), P (%), and K (%) of Opuntia ficus-indica L., as affected by brassinolide foliar spray. Data are mean value ± SE. Bars with the same letters (lowercase for the first season and uppercase for the second season) are not significant at p ≤ 0.05 level.
Horticulturae 08 00452 g007
Table 1. Physical and chemical analysis of the experimental soil.
Table 1. Physical and chemical analysis of the experimental soil.
PropertyUnitValue
Clay%19
Sand%38
Silt%43
Texture classClay loam
OM%1.3
pH7.9
Eceds m−12.3
CaCO3%1.8
Soluble ions (meq L−1)
HCO−31.4
Cl13.2
SO−25.21
Ca+28.82
Mg+24.03
Na+4.55
K+0.32
Table 2. GC–mass spectrometry analysis of Opuntia ficus-indica L. oil as affected by brassinolide foliar application.
Table 2. GC–mass spectrometry analysis of Opuntia ficus-indica L. oil as affected by brassinolide foliar application.
Fatty AcidsBrassinolide Concentration
Untreated1 mg L−13 mg L−15 mg L−1
Stearic acid (C18:0)3.09 ± 0.143.13 ± 0.133.22 ± 0.143.28 ± 0.16
Linoleic acid (C18:2)59.09 ± 2.5260.37 ± 2.6361.86 ± 2.6262.05 ± 2.62
α-Linolenic acid (C18:3)0.20 ± 0.010.18 ± 0.010.14 ± 0.010.12 ± 0.01
Oleic acid (C18:1)20.49 ± 0.9220.88 ± 0.9321.1 ± 0.921.37 ± 0.85
Palmitic acid (C16:0)10.26 ± 0.4410.55 ± 0.4510.94 ± 0.4711.12 ± 0.50
Palmitoleic acid (C16:1)0.34 ± 0.010.37 ± 0.020.39 ± 0.020.32 ± 0.03
Arachidic acid (C20:0)0.10 ± 0.0040.20 ± 0.0080.29 ± 0.0120.31 ± 0.01
Paullinic acid (C20:1)0.26 ± 0.0110.25 ± 0.0110.23± 0.0100.17 ± 0.01
Behenic acid (C22:0)0.08 ± 0.0030.09 ± 0.0040.11 ± 0.0050.12 ± 0.005
Lignoceric acid (C24:0)0.07 ± 0.0030.08 ± 0.0030.09 ± 0.0040.09 ± 0.004
Total identified fatty acids98.9896.1098.3798.95
Total unsaturated fatty acids80.8382.0583.7284.03
Total saturated fatty acids13.6014.0514.6514.92
The data are mean values ± SE (n = 3).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Atteya, A.K.G.; El-Serafy, R.S.; El-Zabalawy, K.M.; Elhakem, A.; Genaidy, E.A.E. Brassinolide Maximized the Fruit and Oil Yield, Induced the Secondary Metabolites, and Stimulated Linoleic Acid Synthesis of Opuntia ficus-indica Oil. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8050452

AMA Style

Atteya AKG, El-Serafy RS, El-Zabalawy KM, Elhakem A, Genaidy EAE. Brassinolide Maximized the Fruit and Oil Yield, Induced the Secondary Metabolites, and Stimulated Linoleic Acid Synthesis of Opuntia ficus-indica Oil. Horticulturae. 2022; 8(5):452. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8050452

Chicago/Turabian Style

Atteya, Amira K. G., Rasha S. El-Serafy, Khaled M. El-Zabalawy, Abeer Elhakem, and Esmail A. E. Genaidy. 2022. "Brassinolide Maximized the Fruit and Oil Yield, Induced the Secondary Metabolites, and Stimulated Linoleic Acid Synthesis of Opuntia ficus-indica Oil" Horticulturae 8, no. 5: 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8050452

APA Style

Atteya, A. K. G., El-Serafy, R. S., El-Zabalawy, K. M., Elhakem, A., & Genaidy, E. A. E. (2022). Brassinolide Maximized the Fruit and Oil Yield, Induced the Secondary Metabolites, and Stimulated Linoleic Acid Synthesis of Opuntia ficus-indica Oil. Horticulturae, 8(5), 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8050452

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop