Next Article in Journal
Impact of Artificial Polyploidization in Ajuga reptans on Content of Selected Biologically Active Glycosides and Phytoecdysone
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Different Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Entries and Varieties for Performance and Adaptation in Mali, West Africa
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Climatic Suitability of Different Areas in Abruzzo, Central Italy, for the Cultivation of Hazelnut

Horticulturae 2022, 8(7), 580; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8070580
by Bruno Di Lena 1, Gabriele Curci 2,3, Lorenzo Vergni 4 and Daniela Farinelli 4,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Horticulturae 2022, 8(7), 580; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8070580
Submission received: 19 March 2022 / Revised: 27 April 2022 / Accepted: 24 June 2022 / Published: 27 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Fruit Production Systems)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

please see the suggestions to improve the submitted manuscript:

Line 137: Correct double ’is’.

Line 146 delete double separation

Line 185: correct ’is very low winter temperatures' to ‘are very low winter temperatures'.

Table 2 could be significantly improved since in the current form it is not clear and readable.  

Line 500 upward ‘trend’ (add the word)

The results section contains numerous references, thus it already represents the ‘results and discussion section’. Maybe the 'discuss' section from line 576 could be renamed to concluding remarks, or combined into single the ‘results and discussion section’.

 

It would be interesting to add the actual flowering dates for the investigated sites and years as supplementary material.

Author Response

The parts of the manuscript, which have been add or modified or deleted are reported in the tracked version.

To follow, the authors' answers to the reviewer:

Line 137: Correct double ’is’. Done

Line 146 delete double separation done

Line 185: correct ’is very low winter temperatures' to ‘are very low winter temperatures'. done

Table 2 could be significantly improved since in the current form it is not clear and readable.  

Authors divided the original table into two tables for better reading

Line 500 upward ‘trend’ (add the word) done

The results section contains numerous references, thus it already represents the ‘results and discussion section’. Maybe the 'discuss' section from line 576 could be renamed to concluding remarks, or combined into single the ‘results and discussion section’.

Authors thank the reviewer for constructive comments. The authors, to respect the template of the MDPI, following the indications of the reviewer, have simplified this part, eliminating all references except one “An increase in warm season precipitation was also reported by Curci [22]”, as related to the subject of the sentence, focusing the discussion in the following chapter.

It would be interesting to add the actual flowering dates for the investigated sites and years as supplementary material.

The authors agree with the auditor, unfortunately, however, the hazelnut is not yet cultivated extensively in the Abruzzo region. The few hazelnut orchards present are still very young and therefore no data are available regarding the flowering.

Reviewer 2 Report

Horticulturae 1666131

This paper examines areas suitable for the cultivation of hazelnut trees based on climatic data in central eastern Italy.  The experimental approach appears sound and is based on similar studies in other tree crops.

The manuscript is not suitable for publication in its present format. The paper runs to 22 pages and the important findings are lost in the maze of texts, tables and figures.  A smaller paper would be much easier to read and would have greater impact on horticultural science.

The most important figure is shown on page 15.  Figure 9 indicates the suitability of different areas for hazelnut production.  The preceding figures are not required and should be deleted or saved as supplementary files.  I recommend that Figures 2-8 be deleted.  The text (Results) related to these figures should also be deleted.  Climatic data are shown in Table 1 (which needs to be reformatted).

The information on climate change is satisfactory.

The five stations that were satisfactory should be indicated in the Abstract.

Some of the general information in the Introduction should be deleted (reduce to no more than a single page).

I recommend that the paper be revised and submitted for further review.

Author Response

The parts of the manuscript, which have been add or modified or deleted are reported in the tracked version.

To follow, the authors' answers to the reviewer:

This paper examines areas suitable for the cultivation of hazelnut trees based on climatic data in central eastern Italy.  The experimental approach appears sound and is based on similar studies in other tree crops.

The manuscript is not suitable for publication in its present format. The paper runs to 22 pages and the important findings are lost in the maze of texts, tables and figures.  A smaller paper would be much easier to read and would have greater impact on horticultural science.

The authors agree with the reviewer and had tried to reduce the length of the manuscript as suggested.

 

This paper examines areas suitable for the cultivation of hazelnut trees based on climatic data in central eastern Italy.  The experimental approach appears sound and is based on similar studies in other tree crops.

The most important figure is shown on page 15.  Figure 9 indicates the suitability of different areas for hazelnut production.  The preceding figures are not required and should be deleted or saved as supplementary files.  I recommend that Figures 2-8 be deleted.  The text (Results) related to these figures should also be deleted. 

The authors moved figures 2-8 to supplementary material to make this information available. The text was reduced but not completely deleted otherwise the subsequent classification of the stations would have been difficult to understand.

 

Climatic data are shown in Table 1 (which needs to be reformatted).

The authors have splitted the table in two to improve the reading

 

The information on climate change is satisfactory. The five stations that were satisfactory should be indicated in the Abstract. Done

 

Some of the general information in the Introduction should be deleted (reduce to no more than a single page).

The authors agreed and reduced this part as suggested.

 

Reviewer 3 Report

In this paper, the authors presented climatic suitability of specific territories in regard to the cultivation of the hazelnut tree.

The study is vast but is of local importance.

The work is mostly of ecological aspects rather than mechanistic approaches.

Overall, the paper is poorly written and wordy.

There are many formatting issue and references are erroneous.

Author Response

The parts of the manuscript, which have been add or modified or deleted are reported in the tracked version. To follow, the authors' answers to the reviewer:

In this paper, the authors presented climatic suitability of specific territories in regard to the cultivation of the hazelnut tree. The study is vast but is of local importance.  The work is mostly of ecological aspects rather than mechanistic approaches. Overall, the paper is poorly written and wordy. There are many formatting issue and references are erroneous.

 Authors thank the reviewer and had made suggested corrections.

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Horticulturae 1666131 R1

Many thanks to the authors for the revision.

I have provided a few comments for the authors’ consideration.

Please see the attached file for suggestions to improve the Title/Abstract.

The ‘Introduction’ is still too long.  Can the authors carefully go through the text to reduce this section to no more than a single page.

Tables 2 and 3 should be moved to supplementary files.  Present information about the ranges in temperatures (max/min) in the text.

There is a lot of data presented in the ‘Results’.  Could the authors try and reduce some of the text in this section?

The ‘Conclusion’ should be reduced to a short paragraph, highlighting the most suitable areas for hazelnut and the impact of climate change on GDD.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The manuscript was not revised as per my comments. Just answered in one line.

I do not think this paper is suitable for the journal, horticulture.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 3

Reviewer 2 Report

Horticulturae 1666131 R2

Many thanks to the authors for revising the paper.  The revised manuscript should be suitable for publication in the Journal (see comment below about the citations).

A few suggestions indicated here.

Line 14.  “the country” rather than “Italy”.

Line 18.  Use the term “below” rather than the symbol (<).

Line 19.  Indicate what GDD is.

Keywords. Species in italics.

Line 336.  “Discussion” not “Discuss”.

There are numerous errors in the citations, which do not follow the format of the journal at all.  Maybe, one of the journal editors could carefully check the revision.

Author Response

To the Reviewer of  Agriculture - MDPI

Perugia, Italy, April 27th 2022

 

 

The authors thank the reviewer for the comments, which helped to improve the manuscript.

 

The parts of the manuscript, which have been add or modified or deleted are reported in the tracked version.

 

To follow, the authors' answers to the reviewer:

  1. Line 14. “the country” rather than “Italy”. done
  2. Line 18. Use the term “below” rather than the symbol (<). done
  3. Line 19. Indicate what GDD is. We changed in “growing degree day”
  4. Species in italics. done
  5. Line 336. “Discussion” not “Discuss”. done

There are numerous errors in the citations, which do not follow the format of the journal at all.  Maybe, one of the journal editors could carefully check the revision. The authors apologize for formatting errors, due to an error in setting the program references. They revised and changes all of them as following:

 

References

[1]     FAOSTAT. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#search/Hazelnuts%2C%20with%20shell (accessed on 4 March 2022).

[2]     ISTAT ‘Coltivazioni olColtivazioni legnose fruttifere 2021. http://dati.istat.it/Index.aspx?QueryId=33705 (accessed on 7 March 2022).

[3]     Jha, P. K.; Materia, S.; Zizzi, G.; Costa-Saura, J. M.; Trabucco, A.; Evans, J.; Bregaglio, S. Climate change impacts on phenology and yield of hazelnut in Australia. Agricultural Systems 2021, 186, 102982. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102982.[4]      An, N.; Turp, M. T.; TürkeÅŸ, M.; Kurnaz, M. L. Mid-term impact of climate change on hazelnut yield. Agriculture 2020, 10(5), 159. doi: 10.3390/agriculture10050159.

[5]     Ustaoglu, B.; Karaca, M. The effects of climate change on spatiotemporal changes of hazelnut (Corylus avellana) cultivation areas in the Black Sea region, Turkey. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 2014, 12(2), 309-324, doi: 10.15666/aeer/1202_309324.

[6]     Challinor, A. J.; Slingo, J. M.; Wheeler, T. R.; Craufurd, P. Q.; Grimes, D. I. F. Toward a combined seasonal weather and crop productivity forecasting system: determination of the working spatial scale. Journal of Applied Meteorology 2003, 42(2), 175-192. doi: 10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<0175:TACSWA>2.0.CO;2.

[7]     Beyhan, N.; OdabaÅŸ, F. The climate factor’s effects on the yield in hazelnut and importance for growing. Ondokuz Mayıs University Journal of Agricultural Faculty 1996, 11, 177-188.

[8]     Baldwin, B. J. The growth and productivity of hazelnut cultivars (Corylus avellana L.) in Australia. Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Rural Management University of Sydney, July 2015. Available online: https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/12892 (accessed on 4 March 2022).

[9]     Piskornik, Z.; Wyzgolik, G. M.; Piskornik, M. Flowering of hazelnut cultivars from different regions under the climatic conditions of Southern Poland. Acta Hortic. 2000, 556, 529–536. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.556.77.

[10]   ÄŒrepinšek, Z.; Štampar, F.; Kajfež-Bogataj, L.; Solar, A. The response of Corylus avellana L. phenology to rising temperature in north-eastern Slovenia. International Journal of Biometeorology 2012, 56(4), 681-694, doi: 10.1007/s00484-011-0469-7.

[11]   Orlandi, F.; Ruga, L.; Bonofiglio, T.; Romano, B.; Fornaciari, M. Fifteen-year phenological plant species and meteorological trends in central Italy. International journal of biometeorology 2014, 58(5), 661-667. doi: 10.1007/s00484-013-0646-y.

[12]   von Bennewitz, E.; Ramírez, C.; Muñoz, D.; Cazanga-Solar, R.; Losak, T.; Alba-Mejía, J. E.; Maureira-Butler, I. Fenología, sincronización polínica y características frutales de avellano europeo (Corylus avellana L.) cv." Tonda de gifoni" en tres localidades de Chile central. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo 2019, 51(2), 55-67.

[13]   Mehlenbacher, S. A. Hazelnuts (Corylus). Acta Hortic. 1991, 290, 791–838. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1991.290.18.

[14]   Mehlenbacher, S. A. Chilling requirements of hazelnut cultivars. Sci. Hortic. 1991, 47 ( 3), 271–282. doi: 10.1016/0304-4238(91)90010-V.

[15]   Luciani, E.; Palliotti, A.; Tombesi, S.; Gardi, T.; Micheli, M.; Berrios, J.G.; Zadra, C.; Farinelli, D.Mitigation of multiple summer stresses on hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.): effects of the new arbuscular mycorrhiza Glomus iranicum tenuihypharum sp. nova. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 257, 108659. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108659.

[16]   Portarena, S.; Gavrichkova, O.; Brugnoli, E.; Battistelli, A.; Proietti, S.; Moscatello, S.; Famiani, F.; Tombesi, S.; Zadra, C.; Farinelli D. Carbon allocation strategies and water uptake in young grafted and own-rooted hazelnut ( Corylus avellana L.) cultivars. Tree Physiol. 2021, tpab164. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpab164.

[17]   Luciani, E.; Palliotti, A.; Frioni, T.; Tombesi, S.; Villa, F.; Zadra, C.; Farinelli, D. Kaolin treatments on Tonda Giffoni hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) for the control of heat stress damages. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 263, 109097. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.109097.

[18]   Taghavi, T.; Rahemi, A.; Dale, A.; Galic, D.; Kelly, J. Hazelnut floral phenology in southern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2021, 101(6), 803-817. doi: 10.1139/cjps-2020-0333.

[19]   Baldwin, B. The effects of site and seasonal conditions on nut yield and kernel quality of Hazelnut genotypes grown in Australia. Acta Hortic. 2008, 845, 83–88. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.845.7.

[20]   Orlandi, F.; Ranfa, A.; Ruga, L.; Fornaciari, M. Hazelnut phenological phases and environmental effects in two central Italy areas. J. Agric. Meteorol. 2019, 75 ( 3), 137–143. doi: 10.2480/agrmet.D-18-00036.

[21]   Corte, M.; Pizzinat, A.; Sonnati, C. Nocciolo in Piemonte linee tecniche per una corilicoltura sostenibile. AGRION, TI-POLITOEUROPA, Cuneo, Italy, 2019, p. 8.

[22]   Curci, G.; Guijarro, J. A.; Di Antonio, L.; Di Bacco, M.; Di Lena, B.; Scorzini, A. R. Building a local climate reference dataset: Application to the Abruzzo region (Central Italy), 1930–2019. International Journal of Climatology 2021, 41(8), 4414-4436. doi: 10.1002/joc.7081.

[23]   Fioravanti, G.; Piervitali, E. ; Desiato, F.‘Recent changes of temperature extremes over Italy: an index-based analysis. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2016, 123 (3–4), 473–486. doi: 10.1007/s00704-014-1362-1.

[24]   Peterson, T. C.; Vose, R.; Schmoyer, R.; Razuvaëv, V. Global historical climatology network (GHCN) quality control of monthly temperature data. Int. J. Climatol. 1998, 18 (11), 1169–1179. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0088(199809)18:11<1169::AID-JOC309>3.0.CO;2-U.

[25]   World Meteorological Organization (WMO). Guide to Instruments and Methods of Observation. Edition: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.

[26]   Luedeling, E.; Zhang, M.; McGranahan, G.; Leslie, C. Validation of winter chill models using historic records of walnut phenology. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2009, 149 (11), 1854–1864. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.06.013.

[27]   Ruiz, D.; Campoy, J.; Egea, J. Chilling and heat requirements of apricot cultivars for flowering. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 61 (3),  254–263. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.06.008.

[28]   Eccel, E.; Cordano, E. Interpol. T: hourly interpolation of multiple temperature daily series. 2012. https://openpub.fmach.it/handle/10449/20808 (accessed on 7 March 2022).

[29]   Bergoughoux, F.; Germain, E.; Sarraquigne, J. P. The Hazelnut. Production and Culture. INVUFEC Paris, France, Transl. JJM Leerschool, 1978, pp. 1-98.

[30]   Cincera, I.; Frioni, T.; Ughini, V.; Poni, S.; Farinelli, D.; Tombesi, S. Intra-specific variability of stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit in Corylus avellana L.: A candidate factor influencing different adaptability to different climates?. J. Plant Physiol., 2019, 232, 241–247. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2018.11.019.

[31]   Mann, H. B. Nonparametric Tests Against Trend. Econometrica, 1945, 13 (3), 245. doi: 10.2307/1907187.

[32]   Kendall, M. Rank correlation methods, 4th ed.; Charles griffin: San Franc. California, 1975; 8, pp. 875.

[33]   Theil, H. Estimation of Parameters of Econometric Models. In Henri Theil’s Contributions to Economics and Econometrics: Econometric Theory and Methodology, B. Raj and J. Koerts, Eds. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1992; pp. 109–116. doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-2546-8_7.

[34]   Sen, P. K. Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1968, 63 (324), pp. 1379–1389.

[35]   Bronaugh D.; Werner, A. Zhang + Yue-Pilon Trends Package ZYP. 2019. https://www.r-project.org

[36]   Benatti, N.; Laruccia, N.; Magazzini, P.; Marchi, N.; Piretta, F.; Pratizzoli, W.; & Tombesi, S. Le carte di attitudine alla coltivazione intensiva del nocciolo. Riv. Fruttic. E Ortofloric. 2019, 10, 32-35.

[37]   Stocker, T. F.; Qin D. Climate change 2013 the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, UK, 2013, pp. 33–115.

[38]   Cramer, W.; Guiot, J.; Fader, M.; Garrabou, J.; Gattuso, J. P.; Iglesias, A.; & Xoplaki, E. Climate change and interconnected risks to sustainable development in the Mediterranean. Nat. Clim. Change 2018, 8 (11), 972–980. doi: 10.1038/s41558-018-0299-2.

[39]   Fideghelli, C.; De Salvador, F. R. World Hazelnut situation and perspectives. Acta Hortic. 2009, 845, 39–52. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.845.2.

[40]   Mingeau, M.; Rousseau, P. Water use of Hazelnut trees as measured with lysimeters. Acta Hortic. 1994, 351, 315–322. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1994.351.34.

[41]   Tombesi, A. Influence of soil water levels on assimilation and water use efficiency in Hazelnut. Acta Hortic. 1994, 351, 247–256. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1994.351.25.

[42]   Gonçalves, B.; Silva, A. P.; Bacelar, E.; Correia, C.; Santos, A.; Ferreira, H.; Moutinho-Pereira, J. Effect of training system on Hazelnut (Corylus Avellana) physiology. Acta Hortic. 2009, 845, 239–244. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.845.33.

 

 

 

 

Yours faithfully,

Daniela Farinelli

 

 

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop