Next Article in Journal
Effect of Nutrient Solution Cooling in Summer and Heating in Winter on the Performance of Baby Leafy Vegetables in Deep-Water Hydroponic Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Role of RcTINY2 in the Regulation of Drought and Salt Stress Response in Arabidopsis and Rose
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Bio-Circular Perspective of Citrus Fruit Loss Caused by Pathogens: Occurrences, Active Ingredient Recovery and Applications

Horticulturae 2022, 8(8), 748; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8080748
by Pattarapol Khamsaw 1,2,†, Jiraporn Sangta 1,3,†, Pirawan Chaiwan 1,4, Pornchai Rachtanapun 5,6,7, Sasithorn Sirilun 2,8, Korawan Sringarm 6,9, Sarinthip Thanakkasaranee 5,6,7 and Sarana Rose Sommano 1,4,6,*
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Horticulturae 2022, 8(8), 748; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8080748
Submission received: 15 July 2022 / Revised: 13 August 2022 / Accepted: 17 August 2022 / Published: 18 August 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Citrus fruit is one of the major fruit crops with large production annually and globally. During the pre- and post-harvest stage of citrus fruit, production estimated more than 20% of fruit biomass is lost. Therefore, exploration of citrus fruit biomass is needed. The author’s study would be an important finding for further utilization of citrus fruit biomass as citrus post-harvest coating materials to improve citrus fruit quality. 

 

Introduction:

- Line 74: 140 million per year? In which area?

- Line 82: What situations can make the citrus tree in stress conditions?

- Line 91: Give detailed information about abiotic stresses and the example.

 

Discussion:

- Line 131: Why P. citrophthora attacks aerial plant parts more frequently than P. parasitica? Which one has the worst effect?

- Line 145: Give detailed information about distinct temperatures of Ca. L. americanus.

- Line 225: Why does spraying the copper compound provide the best result during the fall and winter?

- Line 282: 20.0-50.0μm should be written with space - 20.0-50.0 μm

- Line 535: How do the mechanisms reduce the negative effect of chemical and mechanical stresses by coating?

 

Overall:

- Please consider checking the punctuation and the unit.

Author Response

From: Pattarapol Khamsaw

Plant Bioactive Compound Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand

Re: response to reviewer comments and suggestions on reviewers’ reports of manuscript Horticulturae-1842950

 

 

Dear guest editor

 

We are gratefully appreciated the reviewers for their advice and thoughtful comments made to our manuscript. We have carefully taken their comments into consideration in preparing our revision, which has resulted in a paper that is clearer and more compelling.  Below are our responses (in red type) to the editor and reviewer’s comments. 

Reviewer 1:

Citrus fruit is one of the major fruit crops with large production annually and globally. During the pre- and post-harvest stage of citrus fruit, production estimated more than 20% of fruit biomass is lost. Therefore, exploration of citrus fruit biomass is needed. The author’s study would be an important finding for further utilization of citrus fruit biomass as citrus post-harvest coating materials to improve citrus fruit quality. 

Authors: Thank you very much once again for the time and effort made to this manuscript.

Introduction:

- Line 74: 140 million per year? In which area?

Authors: This was the global picture. The information has been added

- Line 82: What situations can make the citrus tree in stress conditions?

Authors: The stresses which may come in the forms of pathogens and abiotic stress such as salt stress. We have revised the sentences accordingly.

- Line 91: Give detailed information about abiotic stresses and the example.

Authors: The examples from the references have been added.

 

Discussion:

- Line 131: Why P. citrophthora attacks aerial plant parts more frequently than P. parasitica? Which one has the worst effect?

Authors: This because P. parasitica does not produce aerial sporangia but P. citrophthora and other species does, therefore P. citrophthora may give worse effect to citrus tree.

- Line 145: Give detailed information about distinct temperatures of Ca. L. americanus.

Authors: It prefers lower temperature between 17-27 °C. The information has been added.

- Line 225: Why does spraying the copper compound provide the best result during the fall and winter?

Authors: This is to protect the pant from infection during late winter/ spring. The information is added.

- Line 282: 20.0-50.0μm should be written with space - 20.0-50.0 μm

Authors: It has been revised.

- Line 535: How do the mechanisms reduce the negative effect of chemical and mechanical stresses by coating?

Authors: The mechanism for protect and prevent has been added.

 

Overall:

- Please consider checking the punctuation and the unit.

Authors: We have gone through these accordingly.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

The topic of the review is very interesting and innovative considering social consequences. The review is well-structured, but some oversights related to layout, grammar or typing error exist. I suggest a language check and conforming the manuscript to the format.

In my opinion the manuscript could be improve, so I added some specific suggestions in the attached file hoping they might be useful to improve it.

Kind regards.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

From: Pattarapol Khamsaw

Plant Bioactive Compound Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand

Re: response to reviewer comments and suggestions on reviewers’ reports of manuscript Horticulturae-1842950

 

 

Dear guest editor

 

We are gratefully appreciated the reviewers for their advice and thoughtful comments made to our manuscript. We have carefully taken their comments into consideration in preparing our revision, which has resulted in a paper that is clearer and more compelling.  Below are our responses (in red type) to the editor and reviewer’s comments. 

Reviewer 2:

The topic of the review is very interesting and innovative considering social consequences. The review is well-structured, but some oversights related to layout, grammar or typing error exist. I suggest a language check and conforming the manuscript to the format.

In my opinion the manuscript could be improve, so I added some specific suggestions in the attached file hoping they might be useful to improve it.

 

Authors: Thank you very much for your effort to review this manuscript. We believe that after this revision, it does improve the quality of the manuscript, please find the response point- to-point to your comment as in the pdf file. 

Once again, thank you very much for considering the manuscript and I hope with all these changes and improvements, the manuscript would meet the standard for publication of the journal.  

 

 

Regards

Pattarapol Khamsaw

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop