Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Genetic Variability for Fruit Nutritional Composition in the Ex-Situ Collection of Jujube (Ziziphus spp.) Genotypes of Arid Regions of India
Previous Article in Journal
Non-Thermal Plasma and Soilless Nutrient Solution Application: Effects on Nutrient Film Technique Lettuce Cultivation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Horticulturae
Volume 9
Issue 2
10.3390/horticulturae9020209
Review Report
horticulturae-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Production of Quinoa Leafy Greens in High Tunnel for Season Extension in Missouri

Horticulturae 2023, 9(2), 209; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9020209
by Safiullah Pathan *, Grato Ndunguru, Md R. Islam, Sadia T. Jhumur and Addissu G. Ayele
Reviewer 1:
Zhiwei Wang
Reviewer 2:
Daiva Makutėnienė
Horticulturae 2023, 9(2), 209; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9020209
Submission received: 9 January 2023 / Revised: 31 January 2023 / Accepted: 3 February 2023 / Published: 4 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Vegetable Production Systems)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

abstract only described previous literature, material method? results? please rewrite the abstract add results more clearly and add conclusion line of the abstract

line 25 say 33: provide suitable reference, you are describing literature, 

at the end of introduction, rewrite the aims of the study, in points, study aims not clear,, 3 years research conducted as author mentioned,, please cleary described aims of the study,

How measure SPAD value,, please mention wavelength of SPAD index measurment,,? provid suitable refernece

corelation graph (figure quality very low.

overall field study is interesting

Author Response

Please see attached file. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

I would like to thank the authors for the interesting and relevant research. Please find some comments for the improvement of the article below.

1.     In the abstract, the authors are recommended to indicate the period of the research. It is not clear what the purpose of this study is. What research methods were used?

2.     There is a lack of deeper theoretical substantiation.

3.     The authors should present the results of previous similar studies in more detail.

4.     At the end of the introduction, I suggest presenting the structure of the article.

5.     I suggest you to improve the clarity of the article’s empirical research by some schemes and figures that will help readers to better follow your research.

6.     Is the high tunnel structure used in the study typical of US farms?

7.     I would recommend forming and highlighting the discussion part.

 

8.     Limited list of used scientific sources, it should be supplemented.

Author Response

Please see attached file. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper has improved considerably after the revision, although the authors stuck to their opinion in some places. Thank you.

Author Response

Please see attached -Reply to Reviewer's comments 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop