Next Article in Journal
Live Simultaneous Monitoring of Mineral Deposition and Lipid Accumulation in Differentiating Stem Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Mixed Deep Neural Networks for Reverberant Speech Enhancement
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanoregulation of Bone Remodeling and Healing as Inspiration for Self-Repair in Materials
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improving Post-Filtering of Artificial Speech Using Pre-Trained LSTM Neural Networks
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

An Approximation of Heart Failure Using Cardiovascular Simulation Toolbox

Biomimetics 2019, 4(3), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics4030047
by Gabriela Ortiz-León *,†, Heiner José Barrantes-Vargas, Manuel Arguedas-Sandí, Jose Ángel Pacheco-Chaverri and Marta Vílchez-Monge
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Biomimetics 2019, 4(3), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics4030047
Submission received: 19 March 2019 / Revised: 22 May 2019 / Accepted: 25 June 2019 / Published: 10 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioinspired Intelligence)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is a nice implementation of the CVS toolbox and its modified version. The paper shows that indeed the pathological states are covered by the inherent models in the toolbox. this is important but what the paper lacks is conclusions regarding further applications in the classroom and in the clinic. It should have a message on top of the actual mathematical value.

Author Response

We added a small explanation about posible uses of the results

We did not understand the last sentence in your review

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors simulated five different types of hemodynamics including healthy and diseased heart conditions using electrical circuit analogies, and this approach may contribute to cost reduction and shortening the duration of the design process of cardiac medical devices. The paper provides interesting data, but it needs a considerable revision to be acceptable for publication.

 

Major comments:

1. Although the authors successfully represented several types of hemodynamics, the authors use existing tool and the description of originality is inadequate. It is important to clarify the difference between the present study and previous studies. The authors should describe the originality and the novelty of your study.

 

2. I could not find the Discussion section in the manuscript and I think that the results of the manuscript are not well discussed. The authors should follow the submission guideline.

 

Minor comments:

1. I do not recommend using abbreviations in the Abstract, and the authors should spell out each of abbreviations the first time it appears in the main text.

 

2. There are quite some typographical errors in the manuscript. Please correct the spelling carefully.

 

I hope these comments will be helpful.


Author Response

Major comments

This is a modified version of CVST,  the paper shows that indeed the pathological states are covered and can be simulated by the inherent models in the toolbox

The submition guideline was followed as recommended


Minor comments

Recommendation followed

The spelling has been revised

Back to TopTop