Next Article in Journal
Studying Stickiness: Methods, Trade-Offs, and Perspectives in Measuring Reversible Biological Adhesion and Friction
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation and Evaluation of PDMS/Carbon Soot Particles Superhydrophobic Biomimetic Composite Coating with Self-Cleaning and Durability
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomimetics
Volume 7
Issue 3
10.3390/biomimetics7030133
biomimetics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles Incorporation on Shear Bond Strength and Antibacterial Activity of an Orthodontic Composite: An In Vitro Study

by
Abdolrasoul Rangrazi
1,
Maryam Sadat Daneshmand
2,
Kiarash Ghazvini
3 and
Hooman Shafaee
4,*
1
Dental Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 91778-99191, Iran
2
School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 91778-99191, Iran
3
Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 91778-99191, Iran
4
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 91778-99191, Iran
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomimetics 2022, 7(3), 133; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7030133
Submission received: 26 August 2022 / Revised: 6 September 2022 / Accepted: 9 September 2022 / Published: 14 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Biomimetics of Materials and Structures)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoparticle (NP) incorporation on shear bond strength (SBS) and antibacterial property of orthodontic composites. A total of 100 mounted premolar teeth were randomly divided into five groups. In group 1 (control), the brackets were bonded to the teeth using the GC Ortho Connect orthodontic composite, while the brackets of groups 2 to 5 were bonded by the GC Ortho Connect orthodontic composite that contained 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 4% weight percentages (w/w) of MgO NPs, respectively and then the SBS was measured. In the following, we evaluated the antibacterial properties of the MgO NP-containing composite on Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) bacteria by the direct contact test method. According to results, there were no significant changes in the SBS as the MgO NP concentration was increased up to 1%, while the SBSs of the 2% and 4% MgO NPs were decreased when compared to the other three groups. The outcomes of the direct contact test indicated the case of 1% as being the minimum ratio of MgO NPs, which almost caused the entire annihilation of the S. mutans bacteria. In conclusion, the orthodontic composite containing 1% MgO NPs can display a significant antibacterial effect against S. mutans bacteria without inducing any negative effect on the SBS.

1. Introduction

Fixed orthodontic treatment is the most preferred mode of treatment for most types of malocclusions [1]. The complicated undercut of orthodontic devices makes it more difficult to maintain the cleansing of teeth, which can lead to the inducement of dental plaque accumulation, as well as cause alterations in the qualitative and quantitative profile of microbial flora and consequently increase the risk of white spot lesions (WSLs) and dental caries [2,3]. The data from the literature have pointed out the common occurrence of WSL in the course of fixed orthodontic treatments, with incidence and prevalence rates of 45.8% and 68.4%, respectively [4].
Standing as one of the main components involved in the fixed orthodontic treatment, brackets are used to transfer forces from the archwire to the dentition in order to facilitate teeth movement [5]. The existing WSLs and caries around and under brackets are known to be a major problem during fixed orthodontic treatments and can result in causing increased costs, delays in the treatment, and irreversible loss of tooth tissues [6,7]. To overcome this obstacle, patients are required to use products that contain fluoride, chlorhexidine, or casein phosphopeptides-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) [8,9,10,11,12]. However, researchers have attempted to focus on preventive strategies that would be independent of patient cooperation, which include coating the brackets with antimicrobial nanoparticles [13] or the addition of antimicrobial or remineralizing agents to the orthodontic composites that are exerted to bond the brackets to a tooth [14]. In recent years, researchers have tested the addition of different nanoparticles, such as Ag, CuO, TiO2, ZnO, chitosan, curcumin, cinnamon NPs, and ACP, into the resin of orthodontic composites [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoparticles (NPs) attracted the interest of many in biomaterial science due to their economic precursor production and antimicrobial activity against various kinds of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, spores, and viruses [22]. In addition, MgO is also exerted for alleviating heartburn, stomach sore, bone regeneration, and tumor inhibition, as well as for the treatment of cancer including nanocryosurgery and hyperthermia [23]. As an important issue, it should be evaluated whether the applied modification to the orthodontic dental materials with antimicrobial agents would cause any significant negative effects to their mechanical properties [24,25,26]. Having an adequate bond strength between the enamel surface of the tooth and the bracket is an important factor for tolerating orthodontic forces and providing control over tooth movement. Failure in bracket bonding is a fatal obstacle in orthodontic treatments that can negatively affect the efficiency while increasing the duration and cost of the treatment [27,28].
Recent studies [22,29] have indicated the antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of MgO NPs against two cariogenic microorganisms, including Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Streptococcus sobrinus. Due to its favorable properties, such as biocompatibility, good color, and antibacterial activity, MgO NPs stand as a suitable option for being added to orthodontic composites for the propose of improving their antibacterial features. To the best of our knowledge, there are no previous in vitro studies available on MgO NP-containing orthodontic composites. Thus, the main purpose of this work is to evaluate the effects of MgO NP addition on the SBS and the antibacterial activity against S. mutans as the most significant contributor to dental caries [30] of an orthodontic composite.

2. Materials and Methods

The first stage implicated the synthesis of MgO NPs, for which 5 g of magnesium chloride (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was dissolved in 50 mL of distilled water that contained a 10 mL solution of 1 N NaOH (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Then, the solution was stirred on a magnetic stirrer for 4 h to produce a magnesium hydroxide precipitate. The resulting suspension was centrifuged to obtain a magnesium hydroxide precipitate, which was washed with distilled water to go through another centrifugation process. Lastly, the precipitate was dried in a furnace to finish the production of magnesium oxide nanoparticles.
Our study included the usage of 100 extracted premolar teeth that were stored in 0.1% thymol solution for one week. The exerted teeth were free from caries, fillings, and endodontic treatment. The root of each tooth was mounted on acrylic blocks. Once all of the samples were cleaned with fluoride and oil free pumice, rinsed, and air dried, the buccal surfaces were acid-etched in accordance with the manufacturers’ instructions by using 37% phosphoric acid for 30 s. Afterwards, the teeth were washed for 15 s, dried, and then randomly divided into five groups (n = 20) as per the following:
Group 1 (control): Bonding with the orthodontic adhesive (GC Ortho Connect, GC Corp, Japan)
Group 2: Bonding with GC Ortho Connect containing 0.5% MgO NPs
Group 3: Bonding with GC Ortho Connect containing 1% MgO NPs
Group 4: Bonding with GC Ortho Connect containing 2% MgO NPs
Group 5: Bonding with GC Ortho Connect containing 4% MgO NPs
The bracket was placed on the buccal enamel surface to be light cured (Figure 1). All the specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 h at 37 °C in an incubator.
Then, they were thermocycled for 1000 cycles between the range of 5 °C and 55 °C, with a dwell time of 30 s. Each sample was fixed by the usage of a universal testing machine (STM20, SANTAM, Tehran, Iran) and the SBS was measured as the cross-head speed was adjusted to 1 mm/min (Figure 2). The shear load, recorded in newtons (N), was divided by the surface area of the bracket base (mm2) to calculate the value of SBS in megapascals (MPa).
A mold (15 mm in diameter and thickness of 2 mm) was used to prepare disk-shaped samples for each group (n = 3). Once the mold was filled with the composites that contained different percentages (1%, 2%, and 4%) of MgO NPs, a glass slide was placed on the filled hole to go through the light-curing process. The unmodified composite was considered as a control group. In this research, the following steps were performed to evaluate the antibacterial activity of MgO NPs by using the direct contact test method (Figure 3):
  • The exerted bacteria in this study was S. mutans (PTCC No: 1683).
  • The bacteria were procured from the Persian Type Culture Collection (PTCC) and cultured on Brain Heart Infusion Agar (BHIA) that was supplemented with 5% sheep blood plates to be incubated at 37 °C for 48 h.
  • The bacteria cells were harvested and resuspended in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
  • The preparation of bacterial inoculum in the predetermined optical density of 0.5, known as the McFarland standard concentration, was done by dilution that implicated the usage of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
  • Then, the 0.5 McFarland standard was diluted in the ratio of 1:250 to achieve the bacterial cell concentration of 6 × 105 CFU/mL.
  • The samples were decontaminated by the application of ultraviolet (UV) radiation.
  • An amount of 100 microliters of the prepared bacterial suspension was pipetted onto the surfaces of the sample. A laboratory glass slide was used as a negative control. Every inoculated surface was placed and kept in a sterile plate for 24 h.
  • The samples’ surfaces were washed with liquid culture medium to recover their bacteria. Then, the washing results were cultured on the brain heart infusion agar (BHIA), which was supplemented with 5% sheep blood plates, to be incubated for 48 h.
  • The number of colonies per plate was recorded to determine the number of viable bacteria.
The X-ray diffraction diagram of magnesium oxide nanoparticles is displayed in Figure 4, which is consistent of their X-ray diffraction pattern from other reference [31].
According to the exhibited TEM image and size distribution of MgO NPs in Figure 4, the average size of these particles is 76 nm (Figure 5).

3. Results

The descriptive statistics of SBS values for the five groups are shown in Table 1. The results of the ANOVA test displayed the existence of significant differences among the groups (p < 0.001), which was also indicated by the outcomes of Tukey’s test (p < 0.001).
As shown in Table 2, there were no significant differences between the control group, GC Ortho Connect containing 0.5% MgO NPs, and the GC Ortho Connect containing 1% MgO NPs, yet the SBS values of GC Ortho Connect composites containing 2% MgO NPs and 4% MgO NPs were significantly decreased. In other words, although increasing the concentration of MgO NPs up to 1% led to the inducement of insignificant changes in the SBS, a reduction was observed in the SBSs of 2% and 4% MgO NPs when compared to the other three groups.
Considering the results of the direct contact test (Table 3), the ratio of 1% is the minimum ratio of magnesium oxide NPs that almost caused the complete annihilation of S. mutans bacteria.

4. Discussions

In conformity to our results, although there were no significant decreases observed in the SBSs of composites up to the ratio of 1% of MgO NPs, the SBS values of 2% and 4% MgO NPs were notably reduced when compared to the control group. The important factors that can cause a reduction in the mechanical properties and SBS include the presence of MgO NPs as an impurity in the polymer matrix and the possibility of its agglomeration throughout the composite. These nanoparticles can interfere in the polymerization process and lower the degree of polymerization, which would subsequently result in weakening the mechanical properties. In addition, the agglomeration of nanoparticles in the composite can turn the agglomeration points into stress concentration points and reduce the SBS [32]. So far, there are no studies available on the effects of MgO NP addition on the SBS of orthodontic composites, while related investigations were performed on the impact of other nanoparticles, such as titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, chitosan, silver, and curcumin NPS, on these composites. Poosti et al. [17] investigated the effect of TiO2 NPs on the SBS of the Transbond XT orthodontic composite. According to their results, the addition of 1% of TiO2 NPs does not cause any significant reduction in the value of SBS. Moreover, Toodehzaeim et al. [16] reported the addition of CuO NPs to the Transbond XT orthodontic composite in the percentages of 0.01%, 0.5%, and 1%, which caused insignificant negative effects on the SBS of this composite. Similarly, the study results of Farzanegan et al. [32] indicated that the addition of 1% chitosan NPs and titanium dioxide led to an insignificant reduction in the SBS of the Transbond XT orthodontic composite. According to observations from Reddy et al. [33], having 1% silver oxide NPs, ZnO, and TiO2 caused a significant decrease in the SBS of the Transbond XT orthodontic composite. Furthermore, Felemban et al. [34] reported on the addition of ZrO2-TiO2 NPs to the Transbond XT orthodontic composite, which led to an increase in the SBS, compressive strength, and tensile strength of the orthodontic composite. In an in vitro study, Sodagar et al. [19] added curcumin NPs to the Transbond XT orthodontic composite in the proportions of 1%, 5%, and 10%. According to their observations, the case of 1% curcumin NPs did not induce any significant negative effects on the SBS of the Transbond XT orthodontic composite, which was in contrast to the results of higher ratios. The outcomes of Yaseen et al.’s research [21] indicated that the addition of cinnamon NPs to an orthodontic composite did not reduce the SBS.
The results of the direct contact test indicated 1% MgO NPs as being the minimum percentage of MgO NPs that is capable of almost destroying the entire S. mutans bacteria. In general, the high surface-to-volume ratio of nanoparticles leads to the inducement of active reactions with the bacterial membrane and consequently improves their antimicrobial properties [35]. MgO NPs were able to destroy the cell membrane and produce reactive oxygen species, resulting in the disruption of the activity of essential bacterial enzymes [36]. In addition, the high pH of these NPs plays an important role in regards to its antimicrobial activity [37]. Related studies have approved the antimicrobial activity of MgO NPs against Gram-negative and -positive bacteria, including S. mutans [22,38]. As it was mentioned, there are no records of MgO NP applications in orthodontic composites; however, the work of Noori et al. [22] reported the achievement of effective antimicrobial properties against S. mutans through the addition of MgO NPs to a restorative glass ionomer cement at a percentage of 1% or higher. Moreover, Toodehzaeim et al. [16] had similar observations, involving the addition of 1% CuO nanoparticles to Transbond XT orthodontic composite, which displayed antibacterial impacts against S. mutans. In conformity to the research results of Poosti et al. [17], the addition of 1% TiO2 NPs was able to significantly prevent the growth of S. mutans; similarly, Sodagar et al. [19] discovered that adding up to 10% of curcumin nanoparticles to Transbond XT orthodontic composite induced a reduction in the count of S. mutans. Furthermore, Pourhajibagher et al. [39] attempted to add 7.5% of curcumin–zinc oxide NPs to the Transbond XT orthodontic composite and succeeded in obtaining a significant antibacterial effect against S. mutans, S. Sabrinus, and Lactobacillus acidophilus bacteria. According to the observations by Yaseen et al. [21] on the same topic, the addition of 3% cinnamon NPs to the Transbond XT orthodontic composite was more effective than the addition of 1% cinnamon NPs to the orthodontic composites in terms of inducing antibacterial properties against S. mutans. Next to the mentioned in vitro studies, several clinical trial studies were conducted on the effects of nanoparticles on the antibacterial properties of orthodontic composites that are exerted for the bonding of brackets to teeth. In this regard, Jahanbin et al. [20] reported the observance of significant antimicrobial properties against S. mutans by the orthodontic composite that contained amorphous calcium phosphate nanoparticles during their study period (6 months). Furthermore, results of a clinical trial study by Rangrazi et al. [14] indicated that the addition of 1% TiO2 NPs and chitosan to an orthodontic composite caused a significant reduction in S.mutans during the time intervals of 2 months and 6 months in each of the lateral and premolar teeth.

5. Conclusions

It seems that MgO NPs induce antibacterial activity in orthodontic composites. Based on the current results, a 1% concentration is the minimum concentration of MgO NPs that has optimal antibacterial efficacy against S. mutans that does not cause any notable impacts on the SBS. It is necessary to conduct long-term clinical trials to evaluate the clinical performance of the addition of MgO NPs for improving the anticaries activity of the orthodontic composite.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.R., H.S., M.S.D. and K.G.; methodology, A.R., H.S., M.S.D. and K.G. and A.R.; validation, A.R., H.S., M.S.D. and K.G.; formal analysis, A.R., H.S., M.S.D. and K.G.; investigation, A.R., H.S., M.S.D. and K.G.; resources, A.R., H.S. and K.G.; data curation, A.R., H.S., M.S.D. and K.G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.R., H.S., M.S.D. and K.G.; writing—review and editing, A.R., H.S., M.S.D. and K.G.; supervision, A.R. and H.S.; project administration, H.S.; funding acquisition, H.SH. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Research Vice Chancellor of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (Grant number:991441).

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Research Vice Chancellor of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences for financially supporting this study. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Harikrishnan, P.; Subha, T.S.; Kavitha, V.; Gnanamani, A. Microbial adhesion on orthodontic ligating materials: An in Vitro assessment. Sci. Res. 2013, 3, 29236. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shimpo, Y.; Nomura, Y.; Sekiya, T.; Arai, C.; Okada, A.; Sogabe, K.; Hanada, N.; Tomonari, H. Effects of the Dental Caries Preventive Procedure on the White Spot Lesions during Orthodontic Treatment—An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kumar, V.; Singh, P.; Arora, V.K.; Kaur, S.; Sarin, S.; Singh, H. Assessment of effect of fixed orthodontic treatment on gingival health: An observational study. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2021, 13 (Suppl. 1), S425–S428. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sundararaj, D.; Venkatachalapathy, S.; Tandon, A.; Pereira, A. Critical evaluation of incidence and prevalence of white spot lesions during fixed orthodontic appliance treatment: A meta-analysis. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2015, 5, 433–439. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ogiński, T.; Kawala, B.; Mikulewicz, M.; Antoszewska-Smith, J. A clinical comparison of failure rates of metallic and ceramic brackets: A twelve-month study. BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 9725101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Øgaard, B.; Rølla, G.; Arends, J.; Ten Cate, J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization Part 2. Prevention and treatment of lesions. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 1988, 94, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Siqueira, W.L.; Canales, M.P.; Crosara, K.T.B.; Marin, L.M.; Xiao, Y. Proteome difference among the salivary proteins adsorbed onto metallic orthodontic brackets and hydroxyapatite discs. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0254909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Heravi, F.; Bagheri, H.; Rangrazi, A.; Zebarjad, S.M. An in vitro study on the retentive strength of orthodontic bands cemented with CPP-ACP-containing GIC. Mater. Res. Express 2016, 3, 125401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kamber, R.; Meyer-Lückel, H.; Kloukos, D.; Tennert, C.; Wierichs, R.J. Efficacy of sealants and bonding materials during fixed orthodontic treatment to prevent enamel demineralization: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 16556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bock, N.C.; Seibold, L.; Heumann, C.; Gnandt, E.; Röder, M.; Ruf, S. Changes in white spot lesions following post-orthodontic weekly application of 1.25 per cent fluoride gel over 6 months—A randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Part II: Clinical data evaluation. Eur. J. Orthod. 2017, 39, 144–152. [Google Scholar]
  11. Benson, P.E.; Parkin, N.; Dyer, F.; Millett, D.T.; Germain, P. Fluorides for preventing early tooth decay (demineralised lesions) during fixed brace treatment. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019, 2019, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ahrari, F.; Hosseini, Z.S.; Hasanzadeh, N.; Ghanbarzadeh, M. In vitro Effects of a Neutral Fluoride Agent on Shear Bond Strength and Microleakage of Orthodontic Brackets. J. Dent. Mater. Tech. 2014, 3, 106–111. [Google Scholar]
  13. Metin-Gürsoy, G.; Taner, L.; Akca, G. Nanosilver coated orthodontic brackets: In vivo antibacterial properties and ion release. Eur. J. Orthod. 2017, 39, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Farzanegan, F.; Shahabi, M.; Niazi, A.E.; Soleimanpour, S.; Shafaee, H.; Rangrazi, A. Effect of the addition of Chitosan and TiO2 nanoparticles on antibacterial properties of an orthodontic composite in fixed orthodontic treatment: A randomized clinical trial study. Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express 2021, 7, 045017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Degrazia, F.W.; Leitune, V.C.B.; Garcia, I.M.; Arthur, R.A.; Samuel, S.M.W.; Collares, F.M. Effect of silver nanoparticles on the physicochemical and antimicrobial properties of an orthodontic adhesive. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2016, 24, 404–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Toodehzaeim, M.H.; Zandi, H.; Meshkani, H.; Firouzabadi, A.H. The effect of CuO nanoparticles on antimicrobial effects and shear bond strength of orthodontic adhesives. J. Dent. 2018, 19, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  17. Poosti, M.; Ramazanzadeh, B.; Zebarjad, M.; Javadzadeh, P.; Naderinasab, M.; Shakeri, M.T. Shear bond strength and antibacterial effects of orthodontic composite containing TiO2 nanoparticles. Eur. J. Orthod. 2013, 35, 676–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Spencer, C.G.; Campbell, P.M.; Buschang, P.H.; Cai, J.; Honeyman, A.L. Antimicrobial effects of zinc oxide in an orthodontic bonding agent. Angle Orthod. 2009, 79, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sodagar, A.; Bahador, A.; Pourhajibagher, M.; Ahmadi, B.; Baghaeian, P. Effect of addition of curcumin nanoparticles on antimicrobial property and shear bond strength of orthodontic composite to bovine enamel. J. Dent. 2016, 13, 373–382. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jahanbin, A.; Farzanegan, F.; Atai, M.; Jamehdar, S.A.; Golfakhrabadi, P.; Shafaee, H. A comparative assessment of enamel mineral content and Streptococcus mutans population between conventional composites and composites containing nano amorphous calcium phosphate in fixed orthodontic patients: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Eur. J. Orthod. 2017, 39, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yaseen, S.N.; Taqa, A.A.; Al-Khatib, A.R. The effect of incorporation Nano Cinnamon powder on the shear bond of the orthodontic composite (an in vitro study). J. Oral Biol. Craniofacial Res. 2020, 10, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Noori, A.J.; Kareem, F.A. The effect of magnesium oxide nanoparticles on the antibacterial and antibiofilm properties of glass-ionomer cement. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mazaheri, N.; Naghsh, N.; Karimi, A.; Salavati, H. In vivo toxicity investigation of magnesium oxide nanoparticles in rat for environmental and biomedical applications. Iran. J. Biotechnol. 2019, 17, e1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Heravi, F.; Bagheri, H.; Rangrazi, A.; Zebarjad, S.M. Incorporation of CPP-ACP into luting and lining GIC: Influence on wear rate (in the presence of artificial saliva) and compressive strength. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 2, 1867–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Heravi, F.; Bagheri, H.; Rangrazi, A.; Zebarjad, S.M. Effects of the addition of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) on mechanical properties of luting and lining glass ionomer cement. Mater. Res. Express 2016, 3, 075405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shahabi, M.; Movahedi Fazel, S.; Rangrazi, A. Incorporation of Chitosan Nanoparticles into a Cold-Cure Ortho-Dontic Acrylic Resin: Effects on Mechanical Properties. Biomimetics 2021, 6, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Salama, F.; Alrejaye, H.; Aldosari, M.; Almosa, N. Shear bond strength of new and rebonded orthodontic brackets to the enamel surfaces. J. Orthod. Sci. 2018, 7, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Akarsu, S.; Buyuk, S.K.; Kucukekenci, A.S. Effects of adhesive systems at different temperatures on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. J. Dent. Res. Dent. Clin. Dent. Prospect. 2019, 13, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Haghshenas, L.; Amini, A.; Bhatti, A.B.; Rahimi, G. In vitro antibacterial biofilm effect of magnesium oxide nanoparticles on Streptococcus mutans. Micro Nano Biomed. 2016, 1, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cui, T.; Luo, W.; Xu, L.; Yang, B.; Zhao, W.; Cang, H. Progress of antimicrobial discovery against the major cariogenic pathogen Streptococcus mutans. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2019, 32, 601–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Balakrishnan, G.; Velavan, R.; Batoo, K.M.; Raslan, E.H. Microstructure, optical and photocatalytic properties of MgO nanoparticles. Results Phys. 2020, 16, 103013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Farzanegan, F.; Shafaee, H.; Darroudi, M.; Rangrazi, A. Effect of the Incorporation of Chitosan and TiO2 Nanoparticles on the Shear Bond Strength of an Orthodontic Adhesive: An In Vitro Study. J. Adv. Oral Res. 2021, 12, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Reddy, A.K.; Kambalyal, P.B.; Patil, S.R.; Vankhre, M.; Khan, M.Y.A.; Kumar, T.R. Comparative evaluation and influence on shear bond strength of incorporating silver, zinc oxide, and titanium dioxide nanoparticles in orthodontic adhesive. J. Orthod. Sci. 2016, 5, 127–131. [Google Scholar]
  34. Felemban, N.H.; Ebrahim, M.I. The influence of adding modified zirconium oxide-titanium dioxide nano-particles on mechanical properties of orthodontic adhesive: An in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 2017, 17, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gupta, A.; Landis, R.F.; Rotello, V.M. Nanoparticle-based antimicrobials: Surface functionality is critical. F1000 Res. 2016, 5, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Slomberg, D.L.; Lu, Y.; Broadnax, A.D.; Hunter, R.A.; Carpenter, A.W.; Schoenfisch, M.H. Role of size and shape on biofilm eradication for nitric oxide-releasing silica nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 9322–9329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yamamoto, O.; Fukuda, T.; Kimata, M.; Sawai, J.; Sasamoto, T. Antibacterial characteristics of MgO-mounted spherical carbons prepared by carbonization of ion-exchanged resin. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 2001, 109, 363–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Beyth, N.; Houri-Haddad, Y.; Domb, A.; Khan, W.; Hazan, R. Alternative antimicrobial approach: Nano-antimicrobial materials. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 2015, 246012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Pourhajibagher, M.; Vaziri, A.S.; Takzaree, N.; Ghorbanzadeh, R. Physico-mechanical and antimicrobial properties of an orthodontic adhesive containing cationic curcumin doped zinc oxide nanoparticles subjected to photodynamic therapy. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2019, 25, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomimetics 07 00133 g001 550
Figure 1. Bonding of the bracket to the enamel surface.
Figure 1. Bonding of the bracket to the enamel surface.
Biomimetics 07 00133 g001
Biomimetics 07 00133 g002 550
Figure 2. Positioning of a sample in the universal testing machine.
Figure 2. Positioning of a sample in the universal testing machine.
Biomimetics 07 00133 g002
Biomimetics 07 00133 g003 550
Figure 3. Direct contact test on a disk-shaped orthodontic composite sample.
Figure 3. Direct contact test on a disk-shaped orthodontic composite sample.
Biomimetics 07 00133 g003
Biomimetics 07 00133 g004 550
Figure 4. The X-ray diffraction diagram of MgO NPs.
Figure 4. The X-ray diffraction diagram of MgO NPs.
Biomimetics 07 00133 g004
Biomimetics 07 00133 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) TEM image and (b) size distribution of MgO NPs.
Figure 5. (a) TEM image and (b) size distribution of MgO NPs.
Biomimetics 07 00133 g005
Table
Table 1. Mean and standard deviation of the SBS in five different groups.
Table 1. Mean and standard deviation of the SBS in five different groups.
GroupsnMean (MPa)StandardFp-Value
Deviation
GC Ortho Connect (control)208.073.36.043p < 0.001
GC Ortho Connect +0.5% MgO207.172.01
GC Ortho Connect +1% MgO206.42.45
GC Ortho Connect +2% MgO205.551.94
GC Ortho Connect +4% MgO204.821.59
Table
Table 2. Mean and standard deviation of the SBS in five different groups.
Table 2. Mean and standard deviation of the SBS in five different groups.
(I) Group(J) Groupp-Value
GC Ortho Connect (control)GC Ortho Connect +0.5% MgO0.738
GC Ortho Connect +1% MgO0.165
GC Ortho Connect +2% MgO0.008
GC Ortho Connect +4% MgOp < 0.001
GC Ortho Connect +0.5% MgOGC Ortho Connect +1% MgO0.834
GC Ortho Connect +2% MgO0.194
GC Ortho Connect +4% MgO0.017
GC Ortho Connect +1% MgOGC Ortho Connect +2% MgO0.784
GC Ortho Connect +4% MgO0.215
GC Ortho Connect +2% MgOGC Ortho Connect +4% MgO0.858
Table
Table 3. The number of the colonies formed by S. mutans for each group.
Table 3. The number of the colonies formed by S. mutans for each group.
GroupsCFU
Glass Slab>100
GC Ortho Connect (control)68
GC Ortho Connect +0.5% MgO31
GC Ortho Connect +1% MgO<10
GC Ortho Connect +2% MgO<10
GC Ortho Connect +4% MgO<10
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rangrazi, A.; Daneshmand, M.S.; Ghazvini, K.; Shafaee, H. Effects of Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles Incorporation on Shear Bond Strength and Antibacterial Activity of an Orthodontic Composite: An In Vitro Study. Biomimetics 2022, 7, 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7030133

AMA Style

Rangrazi A, Daneshmand MS, Ghazvini K, Shafaee H. Effects of Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles Incorporation on Shear Bond Strength and Antibacterial Activity of an Orthodontic Composite: An In Vitro Study. Biomimetics. 2022; 7(3):133. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7030133

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rangrazi, Abdolrasoul, Maryam Sadat Daneshmand, Kiarash Ghazvini, and Hooman Shafaee. 2022. "Effects of Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles Incorporation on Shear Bond Strength and Antibacterial Activity of an Orthodontic Composite: An In Vitro Study" Biomimetics 7, no. 3: 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7030133

APA Style

Rangrazi, A., Daneshmand, M. S., Ghazvini, K., & Shafaee, H. (2022). Effects of Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles Incorporation on Shear Bond Strength and Antibacterial Activity of an Orthodontic Composite: An In Vitro Study. Biomimetics, 7(3), 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7030133

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop