Next Article in Journal
An Individual Prosthesis Control Method with Human Subjective Choices
Next Article in Special Issue
Biohybrid Robotic Hand to Investigate Tactile Encoding and Sensorimotor Integration
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Vasculature and Angiogenic Strategies in Bone Regeneration
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transhumeral Arm Reaching Motion Prediction through Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Synthetic Motion Cloning
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Design, Characterization, and Preliminary Assessment of a Two-Degree-of-Freedom Powered Ankle–Foot Prosthesis

Biomimetics 2024, 9(2), 76; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9020076
by Tsung-Han Hsieh 1,2, Hyungeun Song 1,2, Tony Shu 1,2, Junqing Qiao 1,2, Seong Ho Yeon 1,2, Matthew Carney 2, Luke Mooney 3, Jean-François Duval 2 and Hugh Herr 1,2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Biomimetics 2024, 9(2), 76; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9020076
Submission received: 31 December 2023 / Revised: 22 January 2024 / Accepted: 22 January 2024 / Published: 26 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biologically Inspired Assistive and Rehabilitation Robotics)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This manuscript is about a novel design that integrates two sets of two-stage belt drives and four-bar linkage in a small space and realizes two degrees of freedom of movement.

The material and methods of this manuscript are so detailed that it makes me consider whether some content is not necessary to present. Maybe it is better to restructure the article, I consider that the design and assembly of the prosthetic is also the result of work.

This prosthetic together with the battery weighs nearly 3 kg. Will this weight affect the stability of walking? It is recommended to have some discussions on human-machine coupling.

Author Response

Please see attachment. Thank you.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

biomimetics-2827545-peer-review-v1

 

This manuscript provides a comprehensive report on the design, characterization, and preliminary assessment of a two-degree-of-freedom powered ankle-foot prosthesis, focusing specifically on its application in an amputee participant. The manuscript is articulated and advances the current state-of-the-art powered prosthetic technology.

 

My primary concern pertains to the length and content of the conclusions. This could benefit from a more concise writing. I suggest that the authors consider shortening the conclusion and integrating some of its current content into the Discussion section. This restructuring enhanced the clarity and impact of the final sections of the manuscript.

 

Additionally, it would be highly beneficial if the authors could include or share reference videos showing the movement of participants using the prosthesis.

Author Response

Please see the attachment. Thank you.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop