Next Article in Journal
Newborn Screening by Genomic Sequencing: Opportunities and Challenges
Previous Article in Journal
Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis: A Qualitative Study of Successes and Challenges from Universal Screening in the United States
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Experience of the NPC Brazil Network with a Comprehensive Program for the Screening and Diagnosis of Niemann-Pick Disease Type C

by
Francyne Kubaski
1,2,3,†,
Alberto Burlina
4,
Giulia Polo
4,
Danilo Pereira
5,6,
Zackary M. Herbst
7,
Camilo Silva
5,
Franciele B. Trapp
3,
Kristiane Michelin-Tirelli
3,
Franciele F. Lopes
3,
Maira G. Burin
3,
Ana Carolina Brusius-Facchin
1,3,
Alice B. O. Netto
2,3,
Larissa Faqueti
1,
Gabrielle D. Iop
1,
Edina Poletto
2 and
Roberto Giugliani
1,2,3,8,9,*
1
BioDiscovery Laboratory, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90035-903, Brazil
2
PPGBM, UFRGS, Porto Alegre 91501-970, Brazil
3
Medical Genetics Service, HCPA, Porto Alegre 90035-903, Brazil
4
Division of Inherited Metabolic Diseases, Regional Center for Expanded Neonatal Screening, Department of Women and Child’s Health, University of Padova, 35129 Padova, Italy
5
Waters Technologies Do Brasil, São Paulo 06455-000, Brazil
6
Innovatox, São Paulo 18047-720, Brazil
7
Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105-6250, USA
8
DASA, São Paulo 06455-010, Brazil
9
INAGEMP, Porto Alegre 90035-003, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Greenwood Genetic Center, Biochemical Genetics Laboratory, Greenwood, SC 29646, USA.
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2022, 8(3), 39; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8030039
Submission received: 2 May 2022 / Revised: 17 June 2022 / Accepted: 20 June 2022 / Published: 28 June 2022

Abstract

:
Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC) is a lysosomal disorder caused by impaired cholesterol metabolism. Levels of lysosphingomyelin 509 (LysoSM509) have been shown elevated in dried blood spots (DBS) of NPC and acid sphingomyelinase deficiency patients. In this study, we report our experience using a two-tier approach (1st tier is the quantification of lysoSM509 by ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry followed by the 2nd tier with next-generation sequencing of the NPC1 and NPC2 genes). DBS samples from 450 suspected patients were received by the NPC Brazil network. Of these, 33 samples had elevated levels of lysoSM509, and in 25 of them, variants classified as pathogenic, likely pathogenic, or of unknown significance were identified in the NPC1 or NPC2 genes by next-generation sequencing. The quantification of lysoSM509 in DBS as a first-tier test for the diagnosis of NPC followed by molecular analysis of the NPC1 and NPC2 genes almost doubled the detection rate when compared to the performance of chitotriosidase activity as a first-tier biomarker, and it could likely be increased with the addition of a third tier with MLPA of the two genes involved. This strategy seems suitable for the neonatal screening (NBS) of NPC if this disease is eventually adopted by NBS programs.

1. Introduction

Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC; OMIM#257220, 607625) is a neurodegenerative multisystem lysosomal storage disorder with an autosomal inheritance pattern caused by impaired intracellular lipid trafficking leading to the progressive accumulation of cholesterol, glycosphingolipids, phospholipids, and sphingomyelin due to pathogenic variants in the NPC1 and NPC2 genes, with 95% of the cases related to variants in the NPC1 gene [1,2,3,4,5]. The storage can happen in a variety of organs and tissues, but the main organs affected are the liver, spleen, lungs, and the central nervous system (CNS) [5,6].
The main clinical features are hepatosplenomegaly, jaundice, fetal hydrops, hypotonia, ataxia, dysphagia, dystonia, and cognitive impairment, among other problems. [5,7] Due to the lysosomal storage of several of these lipids, especially cholesterol in the brain, NPC patients suffer from neurodegeneration due to the massive loss of Purkinje neurons in the cerebellum and diffuse atrophy in other regions, neuroinflammation, and demyelination [5,8,9]. The clinical spectrum is thus very heterogeneous, and it can be classified into four main groups based on the age of onset: early infantile, late infantile, juvenile, and adolescent/adult [10,11,12]; the lifespan of the patients can range from a few days of life to 60 years of age [7]. The estimated incidence of NPC is 1:100,000 to 120,000 [5].
Because of the unspecific symptomatology, the diagnosis of NPC can be challenging [6]. The Filipin staining was the first biochemical method employed for the diagnosis of NPC, and until recently it was considered the gold standard test for NPC diagnosis, but it is invasive, longstanding, and laborious [6,13]. Chitotriosidase is a biomarker that can be assayed in blood, and levels can be increased in NPC; however, this test is not specific for NPC as it can also be increased in other lysosomal and non-lysosomal disorders, or it can be normal in NPC patients, especially in late-onset forms [6,14]. Oxysterols have also been quantified in the plasma of NPC patients with marked elevated levels of cholestane-3β, 5α, 6β-triol (C-triol), and 7-ketocholesterol (7-KC) [15,16]. However, several patients have been reported without elevation or with borderline results for these markers. In addition, the biomarker is unstable and difficult to adapt to dried blood spots (DBS), limiting its usefulness, and there is also a limitation in the differential diagnosis of NPC from acid sphingomyelinase deficiency (ASMD) patients [6,16,17,18,19,20].
Another biomarker that has shed some light to improve the diagnostic odyssey of NPC patients is lysosphingomyelin-509 (LysoSM509, the carboxylated analog of lysosphingomyelin), which has been shown elevated in plasma and dried blood spots of NPC patients [21,22,23,24,25,26]. In this study, we report our strategy with a two-tier program for the high-risk screening and diagnosis of NPC using the quantification of LysoSM509 in DBS followed by confirmation with molecular analysis of the NPC1 and NPC2 genes in the same DBS sample, a strategy that can be potentially useful for neonatal screening.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples

DBS were collected from subjects with clinical suspicion of NPC from Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, and Ecuador. All suspected patients were receiving no specific therapy at the sample collection. All tests were performed by the NPC Brazil network. DBS from 450 suspected individuals were analyzed and compared with 74 age-matched controls, and 30 general newborns. All samples were kept at −20 °C before the analysis. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the HCPA (project #2019-0034). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. The data presented in this study are not publicly available due to ethical reasons but are available upon request to the corresponding author.

2.2. Chemicals and Reagents

Ultrapure formic acid, phenol, sodium acetate, and LC-MS grade organic solvents such as chloroform, 2-propanol, and methanol were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA). HPLC grade acetonitrile was purchased from JT Baker® (Radnor, PA, USA). Absolute ethanol was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Tris-HCL, EDTA, sodium chloride, and SDS were purchased from Neon (Suzano, Brazil). Proteinase K was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI, USA). Ultrapure water was obtained from the Milli-Q system from Millipore (Bedford, NY, USA), and for the molecular assays ultrapure DNase/RNase-free distilled water was purchased from ThermoFisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA).
Since no isotopic labeled internal standard is currently commercially available for the analysis of lysoSM509, lysosphingomyelin-d7 (lysoSM-d7) was used as the internal standard. LysoSM-d7 was purchased from Avanti Polar lipids (Alabaster, AL, USA). The working solution was 2.5 nmoL/L of lysoSM-d7 according to the method previously described [25,26].

2.3. Sample Analyses

2.3.1. Quantification of LysoSM509

One 3.2mm disc of DBS was incubated with 100 µL of 2.5 nmoL/L of lysoSM-d7 in a 96-well polypropylene plate at 45 °C at 500 RPM for 1 h. After the incubation, the plate was centrifuged for 5 min at 3000 G. The supernatant was transferred to a new 96-well plate and 50 µL of MilliQ H2O was added [26]. Then, 10 µL were injected into the ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometer (UPLC-MS/MS) [26]. The mass spectrometer was a Xevo TQ-S micro from Waters (Milford, CT, USA) with an XSelect® CSH™ C18 3.5 µm (2.1 × 50 mm) from Waters. The column was kept at 55 °C.
The mobile phase was a gradient elution of 70:30 H2O with 0.1% formic acid [solution a] to 65:35 isopropanol/acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid [solution b]. The flow rate was 0.8 mL with a gradient of: 99.5% A at 0 min, 75% A at 0.75 min, 40% solution A at 1 min, 25% solution A at 1.5 min, 100% solution B at 1.80 min, 100% solution B at 2.15 min, 99.5% solution A at 2.20 min. The mass spec was operated with electrospray on positive mode with multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). Precursor and product ions (m/z) were used to quantify lysoSM509 509,184; lysoSM-d7 472.4,184 with 30 V for cone and 22 V for collision. The injection volume was 10 µL per sample with a running time of 2.20 min. The levels of lysoSM509 were expressed as nmoL/L.

2.3.2. Chitotriosidase Enzyme Activity

The Chitotriosidase enzyme activity was quantified by fluorimetry following the protocol previously described [27]. The reference range is 0–44 nmoL/h/mL.

2.3.3. Molecular Analysis

DNA was extracted from 5 3.3 mm discs using an in-house protocol. In summary, the protocol starts with the incubation of the DBS spots with the extraction buffer and proteinase K at 56 °C to break down the membranes. Then, phenol is used to clean the proteins, followed by the use of chloroform to purify the aqueous phase. After that, the precipitation of the aqueous phase is performed with salt and absolute ethanol. In the end, the pellet is washed with 70% ethanol, dried, and resuspended in distilled H2O. After the extraction, the DNA was quantified using the Qubit®double stranded DNA (dsDNA) High sensitivity (HS) assay kit (Invitrogen) (Waltham, MA, USA) to obtain the concentration data.
Post-extraction, the DNA samples were analyzed through next-generation sequencing (NGS) using the Ion S5 System platform (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with a customized panel (Ion AmpliSeq™Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) including the NPC1 and NPC2 genes. The data were analyzed on Ion Torrent suite and Ion reporter (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) version 5.0. The reference sequences used were NM_000271.4 and NM_006432.3.

2.3.4. Statistical Analysis

GraphPad Prism v.8.0 was used for the statistical analyses. Datasets were not normally distributed according to the normality and log normality tests: Anderson–Darling test, D’Agostino and Person, Shapiro–Wilk, and Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests. The Kurskal–Wallis with Dunn’s post-hoc test was used to compare lysoSM509 levels in suspected NPC patients, age-matched controls, and general newborns at the level of significance of 0.05. Pearson’s correlation with a 95% confidence interval was used to verify the correlation between the levels of lysoSM509 and Chitotriosidase activity.

3. Results

A total of 450 DBS from patients with suspected NPC from Latin America (mostly from Brazil) were received and were compared with 74 age-matched controls and 32 general newborns. A total of 33 samples had elevated levels of lysoSM509 (Table 1).
In the 33 subjects with increased lysoSM509 levels, the mean age was 8.8 years of age (range: 2 months to 53.8 years of age), and 54% were females (Table 1). The mean age for the healthy controls was 12.3 years of age (range: 1 month to 69.7 years of age).
The mean level of lysoSM509 in the 33 subjects who screened positive was 8318 nmoL/L (range: 3003–23,812 nmoL/L). The mean level of lysoSM509 in the controls was 1399 nmoL/L (range: 535–2672 nmoL/L). The mean level of lysoSM509 in the general newborns was 1587 nmoL/L (range: 838–2311 nmoL/L). The mean level of lysoSM509 was significantly higher in the subjects who screened positive compared to general newborns and controls (p < 0.0001) (Figure 1). The samples with high LysoSM509 with normal NGS of the NPC1 and NPC2 genes without a molecular diagnosis were defined as “false positives” (Figure 1).
Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to check if there was a correlation between the levels of lysoSM509 and age. There was a negative correlation observed with a Pearson’s correlation coefficient of −0.5254 (p = 0.0041) (Figure 2). All samples with elevated levels of lysoSM509 and available chitotriosidase results were included in this analysis (with or without confirmation by NGS) (Figure 2).
Chitotriosidase activity levels were available for 31 out of the 33 samples with elevated levels of lysoSM509 (Table 1). The mean activity of Chitotriosidase was 50 (range: undetectable-309 nmoL/h/mL) (reference range = 0–44 nmoL/h/mL). Out of these 31 samples, 12 (39%) had elevated Chitotriosidase activity. Four samples (13%) had undetectable levels of Chitotriosidase activity, and sequencing of the CHIT1 gene revealed they were all compound heterozygotes for two novel variants: p.Trp358Ter (rs3831317; classified as benign by the American College of Medical Genetics-ACMG), and p.Ala359Gly (rs201682373; classified as a variant of unknown significance (VUS) by the ACMG).
Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to check if there was a correlation between the activity of Chitotriosidase and lysoSM509. A positive correlation was observed with a Pearson’s correlation coefficient of 0.3565 (p = 0.0490) (Figure 3).
As part of our two-tier high-risk screening program, all of the samples with elevated levels of lysoSM509 were analyzed by NGS of the NPC1 and the NPC2 genes. Pathogenic variants were found in 79% of the suspected patients confirming the NPC diagnosis (Table 1). Pathogenic variants were identified throughout the length of the NPC1 and the NPC2 genes with no particular hotspot regions (Figure 4). To our knowledge, three variants were reported for the first time in Brazilian patients, and they were classified as pathogenic and likely pathogenic the ACMG, respectively (p.Gln397Ter, p.Val649Leu, and p.Gly1201Glu) (Figure 4, Table 1).
A total of 27 out of the 33 samples (82%) had pathogenic variants in the NPC1/NPC2 genes. In total, 94% of the pathogenic alleles identified were in the NPC1 gene, and the most frequent variant was p.Ala1035Val in 16 alleles (four homozygous patients and eight heterozygous) (Table 1). Six samples (18%) had no pathogenic variant identified in the NPC1 or NPC2 genes by NGS (described as “false positives” in Figure 1) (Table 1), and in two patients (6%) only one pathogenic variant was identified by NGS (Table 1). It is not possible to rule out the NPC diagnosis in these cases without having additional molecular analyses performed, such as multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), which were not available. Furthermore, we have not measured the levels of acid sphingomyelinase (ASM) in those samples, but we have measured the levels of lysoSM and all of them had normal levels, likely excluding the diagnosis of ASMD. Thus, from the 450 DBS received we were able to diagnose 25 NPC patients, with eight further patients still needing additional molecular analysis.

4. Discussion

NPC is a metabolic neurodegenerative disorder with a heterogeneous presentation that can often delay the diagnosis or, not rarely, lead to misdiagnosis [1]. Several therapeutic options have been explored or are under development for NPC. Substrate inhibition therapy with Miglustat was already approved in several countries. Currently, clinical trials are exploring the benefits of the combination therapy of anti-inflammatory coupled with Miglustat, 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HP-β-CD) alone or combined with Miglustat, Vorinostat, Arimoclomol, as well as gene therapy [28]. As in most conditions with neurodegeneration, early diagnosis and early treatment are instrumental to provide better benefits to affected patients [29].
The quantification of biomarkers such as sphingolipids by tandem mass spectrometry has improved the diagnosis of NPC patients, reducing the need to perform invasive skin biopsies for the Filipin test (which is performed in growing fibroblasts). Several studies have shown the elevation of lysoSM509 in NPC patients [21,22,24,25,30]. Based on these findings, we decided to start a two-tier program with the quantification of lysoSM509 by UPLC-MS/MS coupled with NGS of the NPC1 and NPC2 genes as part of the diagnostic workflow of the NPC Brazil Network to provide accurate and faster screening/diagnosis to Latin American NPC patients. It is also important to mention that because of the long distances and delays with regular mail, it was a major landmark to be able to provide the diagnosis using solely DBS that can be shipped at room temperature throughout our large continent.
We have shown that the quantification of lysoSM509 in DBS is a reliable marker for the diagnosis of NPC (p < 0.0001) (Figure 1, Table 1), that the levels of lysoSM509 have a negative correlation with age (p = 0.0041) (Figure 2), and a positive correlation with the levels of Chitotriosidase activity (p = 0.0490) (Figure 3). Interestingly, only 39% of the samples with increased lysoSM509 levels had elevated activity of chitotriosidase, indicating the low yield of chitotriosidase as a biomarker for screening (Table 1). In addition, 13% of the samples were not informative regarding Chitotriosidase activity due to variants in the CHIT1 gene. This well-documented problem affects the use of Chitotriosidase for NPC screening. It is unclear at this time if lysoSM509 is also actually elevated in NPC patients in the newborn period. No newborn samples from NPC patients were available to us, and it is important that future pilot studies elucidate if lysoSM509 can be a valuable marker for NBS of NPC if this condition becomes a target for NBS.
With NGS performed in the 33 samples that presented increased lysoSM509 levels, we were able to identify 25 patients with NPC. However, we were limited by the fact that only NGS of the NPC1 and NPC2 genes were available at our lab, and thus we could not exclude NPC in the eight samples with elevated levels of lysoSM509 without pathogenic variants identified by NGS (Table 1, Figure 1). A possible reason for a normal molecular result through NGS in samples with elevated levels of lysoSM509 could be due to the limitation of the NGS technique in detecting copy number variants (large deletions and insertions). For these cases, the most appropriate technique would be the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) [6,29,31]. MLPA, RNA, and protein analysis would potentially contribute to elucidating the cause of lysoSM509 elevation in the eight cases without variants identified in the NPC1 and NPC2 genes, but it was not possible for us to perform this extended molecular analysis at this time. Another limitation of this study was the larger amount of sample required for DNA extraction. If this method is included in our nationwide NBS, we would need to further optimize the DNA extraction with a lower sample volume (three or one DBS punches instead of five).
The genetic identification of NPC can be complex; until this moment, 575 pathogenic variants have been identified in the NPC1 gene and 30 in the NPC2 [32]. Three novel variants (p.Gln397Ter, p.Val649Leu, and p.Gly1201Glu) were identified in Brazilian patients (Figure 4, Table 1), and to our knowledge, they have not been described in the literature. This highlights the fact that several NPC patients have private variants.

5. Conclusions

Before the validation of the lysoSM509, the NPC Brazil Network was analyzing solely the levels of Chitotriosidase activity, performing molecular analysis of the NPC1 and NPC2 genes in the samples with increased Chitotriosidase activity. As shown in this study, Chitotriosidase is not a reliable screening biomarker. If solely this assay had been used as a first-tier, we would miss the diagnosis of 14 NPC patients (56%) (Table 1). Our two-tier high-risk screening program (quantification of lysoSM509 followed by NGS of the NPC1 and NPC2 genes) showed an impressive diagnostic rate. The addition of a third-tier with molecular analysis of selected cases by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and potentially other methods would further improve its performance. Provided appropriate reference values are well established in newborns (as we demonstrated, they are age-dependent), this approach using DBS could be scaled up to be suitable for neonatal screening when NPC becomes an NBS target. However, we were limited by the fact that no newborn NPC samples were available at the time of this study to demonstrate elevation. Pilot studies are needed to confirm the suitability of this method for NBS of NPC, and to further elucidate the disease incidence, only by having pilot studies we can confirm the sensitivity and specificity of this method as a tool for NBS. Nonetheless, in the advent of NBS expansion by multiplex methods with UPLC-MS/MS, this method can be multiplexed with the assay of several lysosomal enzymes with a short running time of less than 3 min per sample. It is also important to mention that currently no approved therapies exist for the treatment of asymptomatic NPC patients, although there are several clinical trials with new drugs in progress. In our opinion, having a screening protocol established, when such therapies are approved and available, may lead to the consideration of this disease to be included in NBS programs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.K. and R.G.; methodology, F.K., F.B.T., A.B., G.P., D.P., Z.M.H., C.S., K.M.-T., F.F.L., M.G.B., A.C.B.-F., A.B.O.N., L.F., G.D.I. and E.P.; software, F.K., D.P., Z.M.H. and C.S.; validation, F.K., A.B., G.P., D.P. and Z.M.H.; formal analysis, F.K., Z.M.H., L.F., G.D.I. and E.P.; investigation, R.G.; resources, A.B. and R.G.; data curation, F.K., A.B.O.N. and E.P.; writing—original draft preparation, F.K.; writing—review and editing, F.K., A.B.O.N. and E.P.; visualization, F.K.; supervision, R.G. and A.B.; funding acquisition, R.G. and A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the NPC Brazil Network (with partial support provided by Janssen Pharmaceutical), by CNPq (grant #405495/2018-8), and by INAGEMP (grant CNPq #465549/2014-4, CAPES # 88887.136366/2017-00, and FAPERGS #17/2551-0000521-0).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of HCPA (protocol #2019-0034, approved on 9 September 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to data protection restrictions.

Acknowledgments

F.K. and E.P. were supported by CAPES (Brazil), A.B.O.N and R.G. were supported by CNPq (Brazil). We would like to thank all patients and families included in this study. We would like to thank the NPC Brazil network. We would also like to thank Celio Rafaelli and Graziella Rodrigues for their administrative support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Burlina, A. Niemann–Pick disease type C: Introduction and main clinical features. J. Neurol. 2014, 261 (Suppl. 2), 525–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Patterson, M.C.; Hendriksz, C.J.; Walterfang, M.; Sedel, F.; Vanier, M.T.; Wijburg, F. Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of Niemann–Pick disease type C: An update. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2012, 106, 330–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Patterson, M.C.; Mengel, E.; Wijburg, F.A.; Muller, A.; Schwierin, B.; Drevon, H.; Vanier, M.T.; Pineda, M. Disease and patient characteristics in NP-C patients: Findings from an international disease registry. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2013, 8, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vanier, M.T. Niemann-Pick disease type C. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2010, 5, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Bernardo, A.; De Nuccio, C.; Visentin, S.; Martire, A.; Minghetti, L.; Popoli, P.; Ferrante, A. Myelin Defects in Niemann–Pick Type C Disease: Mechanisms and Possible Therapeutic Perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sitarska, D.; Ługowska, A. Laboratory diagnosis of the Niemann-Pick type C disease: An inherited neurodegenerative disorder of cholesterol metabolism. Metab. Brain Dis. 2019, 34, 1253–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Pallottini, V.; Pfrieger, F.W. Understanding and Treating Niemann–Pick Type C Disease: Models Matter. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yu, T.; Lieberman, A.P. Npc1 Acting in Neurons and Glia Is Essential for the Formation and Maintenance of CNS Myelin. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kennedy, B.E.; LeBlanc, V.G.; Mailman, T.M.; Fice, D.; Burton, I.; Karakach, T.K.; Karten, B. Pre-Symptomatic Activation of Antioxidant Responses and Alterations in Glucose and Pyruvate Metabolism in Niemann-Pick Type C1-Deficient Murine Brain. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e82685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Evans, W.R.H.; Hendriksz, C. Niemann-Pick type C disease—The tip of the iceberg? A review of neuropsychiatric presentation, diagnosis and treatment. BJPsych Bull. 2017, 41, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. McGovern, M.M.; Dionisi-Vici, C.; Giugliani, R.; Hwu, P.; Lidove, O.; Lukacs, Z.; Mengel, K.E.; Mistry, P.K.; Schuchman, E.H.; Wasserstein, M.P. Consensus recommendation for a diagnostic guideline for acid sphingomyelinase deficiency. Genet. Med. 2017, 19, 967–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Spiegel, R.; Raas-Rothschild, A.; Reish, O.; Regev, M.; Meiner, V.; Bargal, R.; Sury, V.; Meir, K.; Nadjari, M.; Hermann, G.; et al. The clinical spectrum of fetal Niemann-Pick type C. Am. J. Med Genet. Part A 2009, 149A, 446–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pentchev, P.G.; Comly, M.E.; Kruth, H.S.; Vanier, M.T.; Wenger, D.A.; Patel, S.; Brady, R.O. A defect in cholesterol esterification in Niemann-Pick disease (type C) patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1985, 82, 8247–8251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Ries, M.; Schaefer, E.; Lührs, T.; Mani, L.; Kuhn, J.; Vanier, M.T.; Krummenauer, F.; Gal, A.; Beck, M.; Mengel, E. Critical assessment of chitotriosidase analysis in the rational laboratory diagnosis of children with Gaucher disease and Niemann–Pick disease type A/B and C. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2006, 29, 647–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Porter, F.D.; Scherrer, D.E.; Lanier, M.H.; Langmade, S.J.; Molugu, V.; Gale, S.E.; Olzeski, D.; Sidhu, R.; Dietzen, D.J.; Fu, R.; et al. Cholesterol Oxidation Products Are Sensitive and Specific Blood-Based Biomarkers for Niemann-Pick C1 Disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 2010, 2, 56ra81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jiang, X.; Sidhu, R.; Porter, F.D.; Yanjanin, N.M.; Speak, A.O.; te Vruchte, D.T.T.; Platt, F.M.; Fujiwara, H.; Scherrer, D.E.; Zhang, J.; et al. A sensitive and specific LC-MS/MS method for rapid diagnosis of Niemann-Pick C1 disease from human plasma. J. Lipid Res. 2011, 52, 1435–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Stampfer, M.; Theiss, S.; Amraoui, Y.; Jiang, X.; Keller, S.; Ory, D.S.; Mengel, E.; Fischer, C.; Runz, H. Niemann-Pick disease type C clinical database: Cognitive and coordination deficits are early disease indicators. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2013, 8, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Reunert, J.; Fobker, M.; Kannenberg, F.; Du Chesne, I.; Plate, M.; Wellhausen, J.; Rust, S.; Marquardt, T. Rapid Diagnosis of 83 Patients with Niemann Pick Type C Disease and Related Cholesterol Transport Disorders by Cholestantriol Screening. eBioMedicine 2016, 4, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Klinke, G.; Rohrbach, M.; Giugliani, R.; Burda, P.; Baumgartner, M.R.; Tran, C.; Gautschi, M.; Mathis, D.; Hersberger, M. LC-MS/MS based assay and reference intervals in children and adolescents for oxysterols elevated in Niemann–Pick diseases. Clin. Biochem. 2015, 48, 596–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Romanello, M.; Zampieri, S.; Bortolotti, N.; Deroma, L.; Sechi, A.; Fiumara, A.; Parini, R.; Borroni, B.; Brancati, F.; Bruni, A.; et al. Comprehensive Evaluation of Plasma 7-Ketocholesterol and Cholestan-3β,5α,6β-Triol in an Italian Cohort of Patients Affected by Niemann-Pick Disease due to NPC1 and SMPD1 Mutations. Clin. Chim. Acta 2016, 455, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Giese, A.-K.; Mascher, H.; Grittner, U.; Eichler, S.; Kramp, G.J.; Lukas, J.; Vruchte, D.T.; Al Eisa, N.; Cortina-Borja, M.; Porter, F.D.; et al. A novel, highly sensitive and specific biomarker for Niemann-Pick type C1 disease. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2015, 10, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Pettazzoni, M.; Froissart, R.; Pagan, C.; Vanier, M.T.; Ruet, S.; Latour, P.; Guffon, N.; Fouilhoux, A.; Germain, D.P.; Levade, T.; et al. LC-MS/MS multiplex analysis of lysosphingolipids in plasma and amniotic fluid: A novel tool for the screening of sphingolipidoses and Niemann-Pick type C disease. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0181700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chuang, C.-K.; Lin, H.-Y.; Wang, T.-J.; Tsai, C.-C.; Liu, H.-L.; Lin, S.-P. A modified liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method for predominant disaccharide units of urinary glycosaminoglycans in patients with mucopolysaccharidoses. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2014, 9, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Welford, R.W.D.; Garzotti, M.; Lourenço, C.M.; Mengel, E.; Marquardt, T.; Reunert, J.; Amraoui, Y.; Kolb, S.A.; Morand, O.; Groenen, P. Plasma Lysosphingomyelin Demonstrates Great Potential as a Diagnostic Biomarker for Niemann-Pick Disease Type C in a Retrospective Study. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e114669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Polo, G.; Burlina, A.P.; Kolamunnage, T.B.; Zampieri, M.; Dionisi-Vici, C.; Strisciuglio, P.; Zaninotto, M.; Plebani, M.; Burlina, A.B. Diagnosis of sphingolipidoses: A new simultaneous measurement of lysosphingolipids by LC-MS/MS. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. (CCLM) 2017, 55, 403–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Polo, G.; Burlina, A.P.; Ranieri, E.; Colucci, F.; Rubert, L.; Pascarella, A.; Duro, G.; Tummolo, A.; Padoan, A.; Plebani, M.; et al. Plasma and dried blood spot lysosphingolipids for the diagnosis of different sphingolipidoses: A comparative study. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2019, 57, 1863–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hollak, C.E.; Van Weely, S.; Van Oers, M.H.; Aerts, J. Marked elevation of plasma chitotriosidase activity. A novel hallmark of Gaucher disease. J. Clin. Investig. 1994, 93, 1288–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Sitarska, D.; Tylki-Szymańska, A.; Ługowska, A. Treatment trials in Niemann-Pick type C disease. Metab. Brain Dis. 2021, 36, 2215–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bounford, K.M.; Gissen, P. Genetic and laboratory diagnostic approach in Niemann Pick disease type C. J. Neurol. 2014, 261 (Suppl. 2), 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Chuang, W.-L.; Pacheco, J.; Cooper, S.; McGovern, M.M.; Cox, G.F.; Keutzer, J.; Zhang, X.K. Lyso-sphingomyelin is elevated in dried blood spots of Niemann–Pick B patients. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2014, 111, 209–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Butz, H.; Patócs, A. Brief Summary of the Most Important Molecular Genetic Methods (PCR, qPCR, Microarray, Next-Generation Sequencing, etc.). Exp. Suppl. 2019, 111, 33–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. HGMD® Home Page. Available online: http://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/ac/index.php (accessed on 24 February 2022).
Figure 1. Distribution of lysoSM509 in general newborns, age-matched controls, NPC patients, and “false positives” (samples with normal NGS of the NPC1 or NPC2 genes, but without MLPA of the NPC1 and NPC2 genes). Medians with a 95% confidence interval are shown in the grouped plot.
Figure 1. Distribution of lysoSM509 in general newborns, age-matched controls, NPC patients, and “false positives” (samples with normal NGS of the NPC1 or NPC2 genes, but without MLPA of the NPC1 and NPC2 genes). Medians with a 95% confidence interval are shown in the grouped plot.
Ijns 08 00039 g001
Figure 2. Pearson’s correlation of the lysoSM509 level × age in the possible NPC patients.
Figure 2. Pearson’s correlation of the lysoSM509 level × age in the possible NPC patients.
Ijns 08 00039 g002
Figure 3. Pearson’s correlation between the activity of Chitotriosidase activity compared with the levels of lysoSM509.
Figure 3. Pearson’s correlation between the activity of Chitotriosidase activity compared with the levels of lysoSM509.
Ijns 08 00039 g003
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the distribution of the exonic variants in the NPC1 and NPC2 genes. Boxes represent exons of the NPC1 and NPC2 genes. * Novel variants identified.
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the distribution of the exonic variants in the NPC1 and NPC2 genes. Boxes represent exons of the NPC1 and NPC2 genes. * Novel variants identified.
Ijns 08 00039 g004
Table 1. Demographics of the possible NPC patients with biochemical and molecular results.
Table 1. Demographics of the possible NPC patients with biochemical and molecular results.
IDGenderAge at Sample Collection †CountryLysoSM509 (nmoL/L) 1Chitotriosidase Activity (nmoL/h/mL) 2GenotypeGene with Variant(s)
1Male3.11Brazil8328100p.A1035V/p.A1035VNPC1
2Female1.11Brazil77220.8p.Q710fs/p.Q710fsNPC1
3Female1.1Brazil960995p.A1035V/p.A1035VNPC1
4Female10.2Brazil38199.7p.A1035V/p.V694LNPC1
5Male1.4Brazil10,16980p.F1221fs/p.A1035VNPC1
6Male10.10Brazil577318p.C47fs/-NPC2
7Female36.8Brazil404969p.A1035V/p.G992RNPC1
8Male3.6Brazil38147.6-/-?
9Male5.11Brazil540156p.A764V/p.A764VNPC1
10 *Male8.9Brazil4271#p.T1205K/p.P1007ANPC1
11 *Male8.9Brazil6521#p.T1205K/p.P1007ANPC1
12Male5.7Brazil649533p.A1035V/-NPC1
13Female2Brazil16,323161p.W942C/p.W942CNPC1
14Male2.7Brazil48395-/-?
15Female0.7Brazil10,632309p.A1035V/p.Q397 *NPC1
16Male0.8Brazil15,95826-/-?
17Female3.8Brazil957123p.F1221fs/p.A1035VNPC1
18Male0.5Brazil4820#-/-?
19Female2.2Brazil13,70686p.W942C/p.W942CNPC1
20Female1.3Brazil378578p.F1079L/p.A1035VNPC1
21Female3.4Brazil23,81232p.F1221fs/p.I1061TNPC1
22Female3.2Brazil12,83440p.A1035V/p.G1201ENPC1
23Female0.2Brazil12,662n/ap.A1035V/p.A1035VNPC1
24Female53.8Brazil300311p.S954L/p.P474LNPC1
25Female1.11Brazil7180n/ap.A1035V/p.A1035VNPC1
26Male15.5Brazil4669#p.A1035V/p.A1035VNPC1
27Male48.4Brazil367215p.P1007A/p.P1007ANPC1
28Male3.1Colombia12,62840p.D944N/p.D944NNPC1
29Female0.5Colombia14,980105p.E20 */p.E20 *NPC2
30Male15Bolivia452517p.S1178G/p.V1115FNPC1
31Female15.2Colombia931058p.M1142T/p.V1664MNPC1
32Female9.8Colombia48817-/-?
33Female12.8Colombia472656-/-?
† Age when DBS samples were collected in untreated patients; * Twins; #: undetectable levels of Chitotriosidase activity; n/a: not available; -: no variants found in that specific allele by NGS; 1 Reference Range (controls): 525–2672 nmoL/L; 2 Reference range (controls): 0–44 nmoL/h/mL; ?: no variants identified in the NPC1 or NPC2 genes.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kubaski, F.; Burlina, A.; Polo, G.; Pereira, D.; Herbst, Z.M.; Silva, C.; Trapp, F.B.; Michelin-Tirelli, K.; Lopes, F.F.; Burin, M.G.; et al. Experience of the NPC Brazil Network with a Comprehensive Program for the Screening and Diagnosis of Niemann-Pick Disease Type C. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2022, 8, 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8030039

AMA Style

Kubaski F, Burlina A, Polo G, Pereira D, Herbst ZM, Silva C, Trapp FB, Michelin-Tirelli K, Lopes FF, Burin MG, et al. Experience of the NPC Brazil Network with a Comprehensive Program for the Screening and Diagnosis of Niemann-Pick Disease Type C. International Journal of Neonatal Screening. 2022; 8(3):39. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8030039

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kubaski, Francyne, Alberto Burlina, Giulia Polo, Danilo Pereira, Zackary M. Herbst, Camilo Silva, Franciele B. Trapp, Kristiane Michelin-Tirelli, Franciele F. Lopes, Maira G. Burin, and et al. 2022. "Experience of the NPC Brazil Network with a Comprehensive Program for the Screening and Diagnosis of Niemann-Pick Disease Type C" International Journal of Neonatal Screening 8, no. 3: 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8030039

APA Style

Kubaski, F., Burlina, A., Polo, G., Pereira, D., Herbst, Z. M., Silva, C., Trapp, F. B., Michelin-Tirelli, K., Lopes, F. F., Burin, M. G., Brusius-Facchin, A. C., Netto, A. B. O., Faqueti, L., Iop, G. D., Poletto, E., & Giugliani, R. (2022). Experience of the NPC Brazil Network with a Comprehensive Program for the Screening and Diagnosis of Niemann-Pick Disease Type C. International Journal of Neonatal Screening, 8(3), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8030039

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop