Next Article in Journal
Psychosocial Issues Related to Newborn Screening: A Systematic Review and Synthesis
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of a Model for Quantitative Assessment of Newborn Screening in Japan Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
Previous Article in Journal
Newborn Screening Is on a Collision Course with Public Health Ethics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Newborn Screening in Japan—2021
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Changes in the Incidence of Infantile Spinal Muscular Atrophy in Shikoku, Japan between 2011 and 2020

1
Department of Pediatrics, Ehime Prefectural Imabari Hospital, 4-5-5 Ishi-cho, Imabari 794-0006, Japan
2
Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kobe Gakuin University, 518 Arise, Ikawadani-cho, Nishi-ku, Kobe 651-2180, Japan
3
Department of Community Medicine and Social Healthcare Science, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0017, Japan
4
Department of Pediatrics, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon 791-0295, Japan
5
Department of Pediatrics, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, 1 Bunkyo-cho, Matsuyama 790-8524, Japan
6
Toseikai Healthcare Corporation, Life-Long Care Clinic for Disabled People, 14-3-10 Maeda 4 jo, Teine-ku, Sapporo 006-0814, Japan
7
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, 1750-1 Ikedo, Miki-cho, Kita 761-0701, Japan
8
Department of Pediatrics, Kochi Health Sciences Center, 2125-1 Ike, Kochi 781-8555, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2022, 8(4), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8040052
Submission received: 30 August 2022 / Revised: 13 September 2022 / Accepted: 15 September 2022 / Published: 26 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Newborn Screening in Japan)

Abstract

:
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive neuromuscular disorder. Al-though there was no cure for SMA, newly developed therapeutic drugs (nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec, and risdiplam) have been proven effective for the improvement of motor function and prevention of respiratory insufficiency of infants with SMA. Nusinersen was introduced in Japan in 2017 and onasemnogene abeparvovec in 2020. We hypothesized that the introduction of these drugs might influence the incidence of SMA (more precisely, increase the diagnosis rate of SMA) in Japan. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a second epidemiological study of infantile SMA using questionnaires in Shikoku, Japan between October 2021 and February 2022. The incidence of infantile SMA during the period 2016–2020 was 7.08 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.45–11.71) per 100,000 live births. According to our previous epidemiological study, the incidence of infantile SMA during 2011–2015 was 2.70 (95% CI 0.05–5.35) per 100,000 live births. The increased incidence of infantile SMA suggests that the widespread news in Japan regarding the introduction of therapeutic agents, nusinersen and onasemnogene abeparvovec, raised clinicians’ awareness about SMA, leading to increased and earlier diagnosis of SMA in Shikoku.

1. Introduction

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive neuromuscular disorder, resulting in muscle weakness and paralysis [1]. SMA is currently divided into five clinical subtypes according to clinical severity: types 0 to 4 [2]. In type 0, patients have severe muscle weakness and respiratory failure at birth; these patients only survive a few weeks. Type 1 involves onset before age 6 months, with patients rapidly developing limb weakness and respiratory distress; these patients are unable to sit unassisted. Type 2 involves onset at age 6–18 months; patients are able to sit unassisted but cannot stand or walk independently. In SMA types 3 and 4, patients are able to stand or walk independently. However, the ages at onset are different; in type 3, patients develop symptoms in childhood whereas patients with type 4 develop symptoms in adulthood. In this study, “infantile SMA” is used to denote types 0, 1, and 2.
The survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) is an SMA-determining gene [3]. SMN1 is absent in 95% of patients with SMA [3]. The remaining patients carry an intragenic mutation in the retaining SMN1 [3,4]. The number of copies of survival motor neuron 2 (SMN2) is related to severity of the disease. More copies of SMN2 is related to an improved prognosis [2,4,5]. In general, nearly all patients with SMA type 1 have one or two copies of SMN2. Most patients with SMA type 2 have three copies of SMN2, and most with SMA type 3 have three or four copies of SMN2 [2,5,6]. Patients with SMA type 4 usually have four copies or more [2]. However, this inverse correlation is not absolute; some patients with two copies of SMN2 have milder phenotypes whereas some with three copies of the gene have been described as having SMA type 1 [5].
SMA is a rare disease, and the incidence of SMA varies among countries [7]. Reports of SMA incidence before 1995 were based on clinical symptoms; however, after 1995, reports of SMA incidence were mainly based on genetic testing [6]. Currently, the number of SMA incidence research reports based on newborn screening (NBS) is increasing [8]. Even in the era of NBS, the incidence of SMA continues to change owing to many factors, including awareness about the disease among the population [9]. It should be noted that the current NBS program does not include detection of an intragenic mutation in SMN1 because the occurrence of intragenic mutation in SMN1 is very rare.
Although SMA is considered an incurable disease, new drugs for SMA have been available in Japan since 2017 [6], with nusinersen (Spinraza®) approved in 2017, onasemnogene abeparvovec (Zolgensma®) in 2020, and risdiplam (Evrysdi®) in 2021. Clinical trials have demonstrated that these drugs improve the motor function of patients with SMA [10,11,12]. Early treatment with nusinersen or onasemnogene abeparvovec, especially in the pre-symptomatic stage, has been reported to show maximum effects on the improvement of motor function [13,14,15]. For the early diagnosis and treatment of SMA, NBS for SMA has been increasing worldwide [8].
The introduction of new, effective drugs may raise awareness about SMA among clinicians. According to our previous study based on genetic testing [16], the incidence of infantile SMA was 2.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05–5.35) per 100,000 live births in Shikoku, Japan during the period 2011–2015. This result was much lower than expected, considering reports from other countries, which might be owing to low levels of awareness about SMA among clinicians in Shikoku.
As mentioned, nusinersen was introduced in Japan in 2017 and onasemnogene abeparvovec in 2020. We therefore hypothesized that the introduction of nusinersen influenced the incidence of SMA (more precisely, increased the diagnosis rate of SMA) in Shikoku. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a second epidemiological study of infantile SMA using questionnaires in Shikoku, Japan, between October 2021 and February 2022.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Research Area and Population

This study was conducted in the same area as in our previous report: Shikoku, Japan [16]. Shikoku is one of the largest islands of Japan, separated from the main island by the Seto Island Sea. Shikoku comprises four prefectures: Ehime, Kagawa, Tokushima, and Kochi. Demographic data were obtained from the Portal Site of Official Statistics of Japan [17]. The residents of Shikoku account for approximately 3% of the Japanese population.
This epidemiological study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Ehime University Hospital (approval number: 1610003, 24 October 2016).

2.2. First and Second Questionnaires

A first questionnaire was sent to 84 hospitals with a pediatric department in Shikoku between October 2021 and February 2022. We queried whether any patients with SMA were born in Shikoku between 2016 and 2020 (Supplementary File S1).
A second questionnaire was sent to hospitals that reported having patients with SMA. The questionnaire asked about patient information, including date of birth, sex, clinical subtype, respiratory condition, SMN1 and SMN2 copy numbers, and therapeutic agents (Supplementary File S2). Prior to collecting patient information, informed consent was obtained from the parents of patients with SMA.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The SMA incidence is presented as patient number per 100,000 live births. The 95% CIs of the incidence were calculated based on the Poisson distribution, using Microsoft Excel for Mac version 16.63 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Demographic Data of Shikoku

The total population in Shikoku and in Japan during 2011–2020 was 3,697,000 and 126,146,000, respectively (Table S1). The number of live births in 2011–2020 is shown in Table S2. Both the population and number of live births decreased between 2011 and 2020; the total of live births in Shikoku was 147,950 in 2011–2015 and 127,092 in 2016–2020.

3.2. Patients Identified between 2016 and 2020

In this case, 81 hospitals (96.4%) responded to the first questionnaire; nine patients with SMA were newly identified in this study: six male and three female patients. All patients were born in Shikoku in the period 2016–2020.
All patients showed a complete absence of SMN1. Among them, five patients had SMA type 1, and another four patients had SMA type 2. Each patient with SMA type 1 had two copies of SMN2, and each patient with SMA type 2 had three copies of SMN2.
Together with patients who were born during 2011–2015 [16], details of patients with infantile SMA who were born in Shikoku during the period 2011–2020 are summarized in Table 1.

3.3. Incidence of Infantile SMA between 2016 and 2020

As shown in Table 2, the SMA incidence during the period 2016–2020 was 7.08 (95% CI 2.45–11.71) per 100,000 live births. According to our previous report [16], the SMA incidence was 2.70 per 100,000 live births (95% CI 0.05–5.35) during the period 2011–2015. When the two datasets were combined, the incidence during 2011–2020 was 4.73 per 100,000 live births (95% CI 2.16–7.30). It should be noted that in our series, no patients had an intragenic mutation in SMN1, suggesting the extreme rarity of such cases.

4. Discussion

4.1. Increased SMA Incidence in Shikoku

The results of recent surveys of SMA are summarized in Table 3 [6,16,18,19,20]. Verhaart et al. reported that the incidence of SMA was approximately 11.9 in 100,000 live births [7]. In Osaka and Hyogo prefectures in Japan, Kimizu et al. reported that the incidence of all SMA types and SMA type 1 was 3.1 and 1.3 in 100,000 live births [6]. Ito et al. estimated that the incidence of SMA was 4.2 in 100,000 live births in a nationwide survey in Japan [21]. The reported incidence in Japan was relatively lower than that reported in other countries.
Incidence of SMA indicates the diagnosis rate of the disease. Diagnosis is made based on the disease criteria and, finally, genetic testing. However, it might be incorrect to interpret this as meaning that the lower incidence is owing to the very strict diagnostic criteria applied in patients with SMA or limited availability of genetic testing in Japan. Instead, the lower incidence might be related to low awareness about SMA among the Japanese population.
In the present study, we showed that the incidence of infantile SMA in Shikoku was 7.08 per 100,000 live births during the period 2016–2020. The incidence seemed much higher than 2.70 per 100,000 live births during 2011–2015, although these two values are considered to be within the range of variability.
We attributed the increased incidence to introduction of the new, more effective drugs nusinersen and onasemnogene abeparvovec in Japan during 2016–2020. The news that effective drugs were available for an incurable disease, SMA, was widely publicized in Japan. The increased incidence may reflect the increase in clinicians’ awareness about SMA in Shikoku, leading to earlier diagnosis of the disease.
In Shikoku, NBS programs were started in October 2021 in some districts of Ehime Prefecture [22]. Although no cases were identified via NBS in this study, the widespread implementation of NBS may increase the detection rate of patients with SMA in Shikoku.

4.2. New Therapeutic Drugs and NBS Programs

SMA has been considered an incurable disease. However, treatments for this disease are emerging at an incredible rate. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved nusinersen in 2016, onasemnogene abeparvovec in 2019, and risdiplam in 2020. The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare approved nusinersen in 2017, onasemnogene abeparvovec in 2020, and risdiplam in 2021. Clinical trials of these new drugs show improved prognoses and motor function in infants affected by SMA [10,11,12].
More recently, treatment with nusinersen or onasemnogene abeparvovec at the pre-symptomatic stage in the neonatal period has shown maximum effects on the improvement of motor function. Some infants who were expected to have SMA type 1 based on genetic analysis were able to walk owing to pre-symptomatic treatment with nusinersen or onasemnogene abeparvovec [13,15].
The purpose of NBS is to enable affected infants to be identified and treated with these new drugs as early as possible. Detection of SMA via NBS and treatment of the infant before symptom onset (or before massive loss of motor neurons) could prevent severe delay in the development of motor function or life-threatening respiratory failure. Additionally, normal achievement of motor milestones can be expected. As shown in Table 1, six of 13 patients in our study underwent tracheostomy owing to severe respiratory insufficiency. If these patients had been treated with the new drugs at earlier stage, tracheostomy could have been prevented.
Neonatal screening has made it possible to treat pre-symptomatic patients with SMA. However, there is debate as to whether the copy number of SMN2 should be used to select candidates for such early treatment [23]. The SMN2 copy number is a strong prognostic predictor, but prediction is not absolute (as mentioned in the Introduction). Additionally, measurement of the copy number is not always accurate [24]. Although algorithms of treatment remain controversial, early treatment is preferable even with four copies of SMN2 [24].

4.3. SMA Surveys and NBS Programs

The results of many SMA surveys combined with NBS programs have been reported recently (Table 4) [9,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. A total of 288 newborns with SMA were detected out of 3,674,277 (7.84 in 100,000) infants in an NBS survey conducted in nine countries [8]. SMA surveys in some areas with NBS programs may show more precise results than surveys in other areas without an NBS program. However, the number of areas where an NBS program is implemented is limited.
It is also necessary to keep in mind several limitations of NBS itself. Some infants with SMA might die before being screened for SMA. Some families might refuse to have their infant tested because NBS for SMA is a type of genetic testing. Additionally, current NBS for SMA can only detect the absence of SMN1 exon 7; NBS does not detect any intragenic SMN1 mutations.
At present, we cannot determine whether NBS directly influences the incidence of SMA in Japan. However, it is our hope that NBS for SMA will become widespread worldwide because these programs will certainly increase the number of patients with SMA who are treated earlier with newly available drugs.

5. Conclusions

The incidence of infantile SMA in Shikoku during the period 2016–2020 was 7.08 (95% CI 2.45–11.71) per 100,000 live births, which was much higher than that during 2011–2015 (2.70; 95% CI 0.05–5.35). These results suggest that the introduction of new therapeutic drugs in Japan led to an increase in clinicians’ awareness and earlier diagnosis of SMA in Shikoku.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijns8040052/s1, File S1: First questionnaire; File S2: Second questionnaire; Table S1: Total populations of Japan and Shikoku, 2011–2020; Table S2: Live births in Japan and Shikoku, 2011–2020.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.O. and H.N.; methodology, K.O.; software, K.A.; validation, T.M. and T.J.; formal analysis, Y.K. (Yoichi Kondo); investigation, K.K. and Y.K. (Yukihiko Konishi); resources, C.T. and R.N.; data curation, T.M.; writing—original draft preparation, K.O. and H.N.; writing—review and editing, K.O., H.N. and M.E.; visualization, K.A.; supervision, M.E.; project administration, T.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Ehime University Hospital (protocol code 1610003 on 24 October 2016).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from patients or the parents of patients participating in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Detailed clinical information of the study is not shown but is available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to the patients and their parents who took part in this research. The authors appreciate our colleagues, Satoshi Maniwa, Mitsumasa Fukuda and Risako Urate for starting and supporting this research. We also express our appreciation for the doctors from the following hospitals on Shikoku, listed alphabetically by family name. Those who did not wish to be listed are not included. Takanori Abe (Sumitomo Besshi Hospital), Masaaki Fujita (Iyo Hospital), Ryuzo Hanayama (Susaki Kuroshio Hospital), Isaku Horiuchi (Asahigawasou South Ehime Hospital), Takatoshi Hosokawa (Hosogi Hospital), Makoto Irahara (Tsurugi Municipal Handa Hospital), Yasushi Ishida (Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital), Masayuki Ishihara (Kochi Medical School Hospital), Shigeru Ito (Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital), Asayuki Iwai (Shikoku Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers), Takuma Iwaki (Kagawa Saiseikai Hospital), Keiichi Kagajo (Seto Inland Sea Hospital), Michiya Kaneko (JA Kochi Hospital), Masami Kawahito, Natsuko Ozaki (Yoshinogawa Medical Center), Chiya Kikuchi (National Hospital Organization Ehime Medical Center), Akiko Kishi (Tokushima Municipal Hospital), Makiko Koga (Sameura Hospital), Shuji Kondo (Tokushima Prefectural Central Hospital), Katsurako Kuchikura (Akazawa Hospital), Akihiko Maeda (Kochi Prefectural Hatakenmin Hospital), Masato Maeda (Aki General Hospital), Osamu Matsuda (Ehime Prefectural Imabari Hospital), Takako Miyatake (Takamatsu Heiwa Hospital), Tatsushi Miyazaki (Tokushima Hospital), Shigehiro Nagai (Shikoku Medical Center for Children and Adults), Keiko Nagano (Yashima General Hospital), Koji Nishimura (Saijo Central Hospital), Yukiko Ogawa (Tokushima Prefecture Naruto Hospital), Keiko Onoyama (Amayama Hospital), Yoshiki Ootaki (Saint Martin’s Hospital), Ai Oyama, Kaoru Oikawa (Kagawa Inoshita Hospital), Tsuyoshi Sasaki (Mitoyo General Hospital), Noboru Sato (Awa Hospital), Seishi Shimakawa (Red Cross Tokushima Hinomine Rehabilitation Center for People with Disabilities), Yoshio Takahashi (Kochi National Hospital), Koji Takeda (Noichi Chuo Hospital), Koji Takemoto (Ehime Prefectural Niihama Hospital), Yumiko Tanaka (Higashitokushima Medical Center), Izumi Teraoka (Murakami Memorial Hospital), Yoshihiro Toda (Tokushima University Hospital), Daisuke Usui (Tano Hospital), Hiroyuki Wakamoto (Ehime Rehabilitation Center For Children), Yoshiyasu Yaguchi (Kagawa Prefectural Shirotori Hospital), Mayumi Yamamoto (Shodoshima Central Hospital), Takashi Yamaue (Tenma Hospital), Tetsuya Yano (Ooida Hospital), Ritsurin Hospital, Hatakibonoie Hospital.

Conflicts of Interest

K.O. received personal compensation from Biogen Japan and Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. H.N. received personal compensation from Biogen Japan, Novartis Japan, and Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., and a consulting fee from Sekisui Medical Co. The other co-authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. Mercuri, E.; Finkel, R.S.; Muntoni, F.; Wirth, B.; Montes, J.; Main, M.; Mazzone, E.S.; Vitale, M.; Snyder, B.; Quijano-Roy, S.; et al. Diagnosis and Management of Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Part 1: Recommendations for Diagnosis, Rehabilitation, Orthopedic and Nutritional Care. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2018, 28, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Arnold, W.D.; Kassar, D.; Kissel, J.T. Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Diagnosis and Management in a New Therapeutic Era. Muscle Nerve 2015, 51, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lefebvre, S.; Bürglen, L.; Reboullet, S.; Clermont, O.; Burlet, P.; Viollet, L.; Benichou, B.; Cruaud, C.; Millasseau, P.; Zeviani, M. Identification and Characterization of a Spinal Muscular Atrophy-Determining Gene. Cell 1995, 80, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wijaya, Y.O.S.; Ar Rohmah, M.; Niba, E.T.E.; Morisada, N.; Noguchi, Y.; Hidaka, Y.; Ozasa, S.; Inoue, T.; Shimazu, T.; Takahashi, Y.; et al. Phenotypes of SMA patients retaining SMN1 with intragenic mutation. Brain. Dev. 2021, 43, 745–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Calucho, M.; Bernal, S.; Alías, L.; March, F.; Venceslá, A.; Rodríguez-Álvarez, F.J.; Aller, E.; Fernández, R.M.; Borrego, S.; Millán, J.M.; et al. Correlation between SMA Type and SMN2 Copy Number Revisited: An Analysis of 625 Unrelated Spanish Patients and a Compilation of 2834 Reported Cases. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2018, 28, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kimizu, T.; Ida, S.; Okamoto, K.; Awano, H.; Niba, E.T.E.; Wijaya, Y.O.S.; Okazaki, S.; Shimomura, H.; Lee, T.; Tominaga, K.; et al. Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Diagnosis, Incidence, and Newborn Screening in Japan. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2021, 7, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Verhaart, I.E.C.; Robertson, A.; Wilson, I.J.; Aartsma-Rus, A.; Cameron, S.; Jones, C.C.; Cook, S.F.; Lochmüller, H. Prevalence, Incidence and Carrier Frequency of 5q-Linked Spinal Muscular Atrophy—A Literature Review. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2017, 12, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dangouloff, T.; Vrščaj, E.; Servais, L.; Osredkar, D.; Adoukonou, T.; Aryani, O.; Barisic, N.; Bashiri, F.; Bastaki, L.; Benitto, A.; et al. Newborn Screening Programs for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Worldwide: Where We Stand and Where to Go. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2021, 31, 574–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kay, D.M.; Stevens, C.F.; Parker, A.; Saavedra-Matiz, C.A.; Sack, V.; Chung, W.K.; Chiriboga, C.A.; Engelstad, K.; Laureta, E.; Farooq, O.; et al. Implementation of Population-Based Newborn Screening Reveals Low Incidence of Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Genet. Med. Off. J. Am. Coll. Med. Genet. 2020, 22, 1296–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Finkel, R.S.; Mercuri, E.; Darras, B.T.; Connolly, A.M.; Kuntz, N.L.; Kirschner, J.; Chiriboga, C.A.; Saito, K.; Servais, L.; Tizzano, E.; et al. Nusinersen versus Sham Control in Infantile-Onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 1723–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Mendell, J.R.; Al-Zaidy, S.; Shell, R.; Arnold, W.D.; Rodino-Klapac, L.R.; Prior, T.W.; Lowes, L.; Alfano, L.; Berry, K.; Church, K.; et al. Single-Dose Gene-Replacement Therapy for Spinal Muscular Atrophy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 1713–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Darras, B.T.; Masson, R.; Mazurkiewicz-Bełdzińska, M.; Rose, K.; Xiong, H.; Zanoteli, E.; Baranello, G.; Bruno, C.; Vlodavets, D.; Wang, Y.; et al. Risdiplam-Treated Infants with Type 1 Spinal Muscular Atrophy versus Historical Controls. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 385, 427–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vivo, D.C.D.; Bertini, E.; Swoboda, K.J.; Hwu, W.-L.; Crawford, T.O.; Finkel, R.S.; Kirschner, J.; Kuntz, N.L.; Parsons, J.A.; Ryan, M.M.; et al. Nusinersen Initiated in Infants during the Presymptomatic Stage of Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Interim Efficacy and Safety Results from the Phase 2 NURTURE Study. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2019, 29, 842–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lowes, L.P.; Alfano, L.N.; Arnold, W.D.; Shell, R.; Prior, T.W.; McColly, M.; Lehman, K.J.; Church, K.; Sproule, D.M.; Nagendran, S.; et al. Impact of Age and Motor Function in a Phase 1/2A Study of Infants With SMA Type 1 Receiving Single-Dose Gene Replacement Therapy. Pediatr. Neurol. 2019, 98, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Strauss, K.A.; Farrar, M.A.; Muntoni, F.; Saito, K.; Mendell, J.R.; Servais, L.; McMillan, H.J.; Finkel, R.S.; Swoboda, K.J.; Kwon, J.M.; et al. Onasemnogene Abeparvovec for Presymptomatic Infants with Two Copies of SMN2 at Risk for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 1: The Phase III SPR1NT Trial. Nat. Med. 2022, 28, 1381–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Okamoto, K.; Fukuda, M.; Saito, I.; Urate, R.; Maniwa, S.; Usui, D.; Motoki, T.; Jogamoto, T.; Aibara, K.; Hosokawa, T.; et al. Incidence of Infantile Spinal Muscular Atrophy on Shikoku Island of Japan. Brain Dev. 2019, 41, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Portal Site of Official Statistics of Japan. Portal Site of Official Statistics of Japan. Available online: https://www.e-stat.go.jp/en (accessed on 11 August 2022).
  18. Kekou, K.; Svingou, M.; Sofocleous, C.; Mourtzi, N.; Nitsa, E.; Konstantinidis, G.; Youroukos, S.; Skiadas, K.; Katsalouli, M.; Pons, R.; et al. Evaluation of Genotypes and Epidemiology of Spinal Muscular Atrophy in Greece: A Nationwide Study Spanning 24 Years. J. Neuromuscul. Dis. 2020, 7, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sarv, S.; Kahre, T.; Vaidla, E.; Pajusalu, S.; Muru, K.; Põder, H.; Gross-Paju, K.; Ütt, S.; Žordania, R.; Talvik, I.; et al. The Birth Prevalence of Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Population Specific Approach in Estonia. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 796862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Verhaart, I.E.C.; Robertson, A.; Leary, R.; McMacken, G.; König, K.; Kirschner, J.; Jones, C.C.; Cook, S.F.; Lochmüller, H.A. Multi-Source Approach to Determine SMA Incidence and Research Ready Population. J. Neurol. 2017, 264, 1465–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ito, M.; Yamauchi, A.; Urano, M.; Kato, T.; Matsuo, M.; Nakashima, K.; Saito, K. Epidemiological Investigation of Spinal Muscular Atrophy in Japan. Brain Dev. 2022, 44, 2–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ehime Children’s Advanced Medical Council. Available online: https://www.m.ehime-u.ac.jp/screening/ (accessed on 11 August 2022).
  23. Glascock, J.; Sampson, J.; Haidet-Phillips, A.; Connolly, A.; Darras, B.; Day, J.; Finkel, R.; Howell, R.R.; Klinger, K.; Kuntz, N.; et al. Treatment Algorithm for Infants Diagnosed with Spinal Muscular Atrophy through Newborn Screening. J. Neuromuscul. Dis. 2018, 5, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Glascock, J.; Sampson, J.; Connolly, A.M.; Darras, B.T.; Day, J.W.; Finkel, R.; Howell, R.R.; Klinger, K.W.; Kuntz, N.; Prior, T.; et al. Revised Recommendations for the Treatment of Infants Diagnosed with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Via Newborn Screening Who Have 4 Copies of SMN2. J. Neuromuscul. Dis. 2020, 7, 97–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chien, Y.-H.; Chiang, S.-C.; Weng, W.-C.; Lee, N.-C.; Lin, C.-J.; Hsieh, W.-S.; Lee, W.-T.; Jong, Y.-J.; Ko, T.-M.; Hwu, W.-L. Presymptomatic Diagnosis of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Through Newborn Screening. J. Pediatr. 2017, 190, 124–129e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shinohara, M.; Niba, E.T.E.; Wijaya, Y.O.S.; Takayama, I.; Mitsuishi, C.; Kumasaka, S.; Kondo, Y.; Takatera, A.; Hokuto, I.; Morioka, I.; et al. A Novel System for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in Newborns: Japanese Pilot Study. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2019, 5, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Czibere, L.; Burggraf, S.; Fleige, T.; Glück, B.; Keitel, L.M.; Landt, O.; Durner, J.; Röschinger, W.; Hohenfellner, K.; Wirth, B.; et al. High-Throughput Genetic Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy by Rapid Nucleic Acid Extraction from Dried Blood Spots and 384-Well QPCR. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. EJHG 2020, 28, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kariyawasam, D.S.T.; Russell, J.S.; Wiley, V.; Alexander, I.E.; Farrar, M.A. The Implementation of Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy: The Australian Experience. Genet. Med. Off. J. Am. Coll. Med. Genet. 2020, 22, 557–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Boemer, F.; Caberg, J.-H.; Beckers, P.; Dideberg, V.; di Fiore, S.; Bours, V.; Marie, S.; Dewulf, J.; Marcelis, L.; Deconinck, N.; et al. Three Years Pilot of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Newborn Screening Turned into Official Program in Southern Belgium. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 19922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kucera, K.S.; Taylor, J.L.; Robles, V.R.; Clinard, K.; Migliore, B.; Boyea, B.L.; Okoniewski, K.C.; Duparc, M.; Rehder, C.W.; Shone, S.M.; et al. A Voluntary Statewide Newborn Screening Pilot for Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Results from Early Check. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2021, 7, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Baker, M.W.; Mochal, S.T.; Dawe, S.J.; Wiberley-Bradford, A.E.; Cogley, M.F.; Zeitler, B.R.; Piro, Z.D.; Harmelink, M.M.; Kwon, J.M. Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy: The Wisconsin First Year Experience. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2022, 32, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Patients’ clinical information.
Table 1. Patients’ clinical information.
CaseBirth YearSexSubtypeCopy NumberGenetic TestingOnset (Month)Diagnosis (Month)Respiratory Support e
SMN1SMN2
1 a2012Male102qPCR24TPPV
2 a2013Male102qPCR14TPPV
3 a2014Male103 dqPCR913No
4 a2015Female102MLPA68TPPV
52016Male203MLPA1323No
62017Male102MLPA23TPPV
7 b2017Female102MLPA34NIPPV
8 c2018Male102MLPA2–33TPPV
9 c2018Male102MLPA2–33TPPV
102018Male203MLPA915No
112019Female102MLPA35No
122020Male203MLPA811No
132020Female203MLPA1014No
a Cases 1–4 were reported in our previous study [15]; b The patient was born in Shikoku, and then moved out of Shikoku; c Patients 8 and 9 are twins; d This case was a patient with type 1 who had three copies of SMN2, suggesting the inverse correlation rule is not absolute (See the Introduction section); e In each case, facilities for respiratory support were available at the research point. Abbreviations: qPCR, real-time quantitative PCR; polymerase chain reaction; MLPA, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, TPPV, tracheostomy with invasive positive-pressure ventilation, NIPPV, non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation.
Table 2. Patients with infantile SMA during 2011–2020 on Shikoku.
Table 2. Patients with infantile SMA during 2011–2020 on Shikoku.
YearType 1Type 2All TypesLive BirthsIncidence
201100030,798
201210130,301
201310129,687
201410128,661
201510128,503
201601127,546
201720226,975
201821325,786
201910123,901
202002222,884
2011–2015404147,9502.70 a
2016–2020549127,0927.08 a
2011–20209413275,0424.73 a
a Incidence per 100,000 live births.
Table 3. Spinal muscular atrophy incidence reported in previous studies.
Table 3. Spinal muscular atrophy incidence reported in previous studies.
Country/RegionPeriodLive BirthsAll TypesType 1Reference
CasesIncidence aCasesIncidence a
Greece1995–20182,437,3482008.2 Kekou, 2020 [18]
Estonia1996–2020347,9934212.1246.9Sarv, 2021 [19]
Japan2007–20161,197,156373.1211.3Kimizu, 2021 [6]
Europe2011–201522,325,221377616.9 Verhaart, 2017 [20]
Japan2011–2015147,950 42.7Okamoto, 2019 [16]
a Incidence per 100,000 live births.
Table 4. Incidence of spinal muscular atrophy determined via newborn screening.
Table 4. Incidence of spinal muscular atrophy determined via newborn screening.
Country/RegionPeriodLive BirthsCases NumberIncidence aReferences
All
Subtypes
SMN2,
2 Copies
All
Subtypes
SMN2,
2 Copies
TaiwanNovember 2014–September 2016120,267735.822.49Chien, 2017 [25]
JapanJanuary 2018–April 2019415700--Shinohara, 2019 [26]
GermanyJanuary 2018–June 2019213,27930-14.07-Czibere, 2020 [27]
Australia 103,9039-8.66-Kariyawasam, 2020 [28]
USA (New York State)2018225,093833.551.33Kay, 2020 [9]
Southern BelgiumMarch 2018–February 2021136,3391057.333.67Boemer, 2021 [29]
USA (North Carolina) 12,065118.298.29Kucera, 2021 [30]
United States (USA)October 2019–October 202060,984629.843.28Baker, 2022 [31]
a Incidence per 100,000 live births.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Okamoto, K.; Nishio, H.; Motoki, T.; Jogamoto, T.; Aibara, K.; Kondo, Y.; Kawamura, K.; Konishi, Y.; Tokorodani, C.; Nishiuchi, R.; et al. Changes in the Incidence of Infantile Spinal Muscular Atrophy in Shikoku, Japan between 2011 and 2020. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2022, 8, 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8040052

AMA Style

Okamoto K, Nishio H, Motoki T, Jogamoto T, Aibara K, Kondo Y, Kawamura K, Konishi Y, Tokorodani C, Nishiuchi R, et al. Changes in the Incidence of Infantile Spinal Muscular Atrophy in Shikoku, Japan between 2011 and 2020. International Journal of Neonatal Screening. 2022; 8(4):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8040052

Chicago/Turabian Style

Okamoto, Kentaro, Hisahide Nishio, Takahiro Motoki, Toshihiro Jogamoto, Kaori Aibara, Yoichi Kondo, Kentaro Kawamura, Yukihiko Konishi, Chiho Tokorodani, Ritsuo Nishiuchi, and et al. 2022. "Changes in the Incidence of Infantile Spinal Muscular Atrophy in Shikoku, Japan between 2011 and 2020" International Journal of Neonatal Screening 8, no. 4: 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8040052

APA Style

Okamoto, K., Nishio, H., Motoki, T., Jogamoto, T., Aibara, K., Kondo, Y., Kawamura, K., Konishi, Y., Tokorodani, C., Nishiuchi, R., & Eguchi, M. (2022). Changes in the Incidence of Infantile Spinal Muscular Atrophy in Shikoku, Japan between 2011 and 2020. International Journal of Neonatal Screening, 8(4), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8040052

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop