Next Article in Journal
Can Computational Intelligence Model Phenomenal Consciousness?
Next Article in Special Issue
The Sophisticated and Naive View of Moral Experience
Previous Article in Journal
Determinism, Counterfactuals, and the Possibility of Time Travel
Previous Article in Special Issue
Perception, Self, and Zen: On Iris Murdoch and the Taming of Simone Weil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Value Feelings: A Defense

Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45141 Essen, Germany
Philosophies 2023, 8(4), 69; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies8040069
Submission received: 19 April 2023 / Revised: 17 July 2023 / Accepted: 18 July 2023 / Published: 26 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Moral Perception)

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to provide an initial defense of a neglected epistemology of value according to which a fundamental mode of access to evaluative facts and properties is constituted by a distinctive kind of feeling, sometimes called ‘value feeling’. The paper defends the appeal to value feelings against some objections that have been leveled against it, objections intended to show that it is a nonstarter. The paper argues that these objections can be met and that the view that there are such value feelings constitutes a reasonable hypothesis.
Keywords: emotions; feelings; value feelings; emotion theory; moral epistemology emotions; feelings; value feelings; emotion theory; moral epistemology

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Naar, H. Value Feelings: A Defense. Philosophies 2023, 8, 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies8040069

AMA Style

Naar H. Value Feelings: A Defense. Philosophies. 2023; 8(4):69. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies8040069

Chicago/Turabian Style

Naar, Hichem. 2023. "Value Feelings: A Defense" Philosophies 8, no. 4: 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies8040069

APA Style

Naar, H. (2023). Value Feelings: A Defense. Philosophies, 8(4), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies8040069

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop