Next Article in Journal
Increased Short-Term Fluctuation in Optic Nerve Head Blood Flow in a Case of Normal-Tension Glaucoma by the Use of Laser Speckle Flowgraphy
Previous Article in Journal
Multifocal Electroretinography in the Presence of Temporal and Spatial Correlations and Eye Movements
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Vision
Volume 1
Issue 1
10.3390/vision1010004
vision-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Comparative Anatomy of the Trabecular Meshwork, the Optic Nerve Head and the Inner Retina in Rodent and Primate Models Used for Glaucoma Research

by
Liwen Chen
,
Yin Zhao
and
Hong Zhang
*
Department of Ophthalmology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Avenue, 430030 Wuhan, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vision 2017, 1(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/vision1010004
Submission received: 18 May 2016 / Revised: 26 June 2016 / Accepted: 8 July 2016 / Published: 18 July 2016
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Glaucoma is a heterogeneous group of ocular disorders with a multi-faceted etiology. Although numerous studies on glaucoma using different animal models have been published, it is unwise to simply generalize the results of one model to all glaucomatous situations because of the differences in the anatomy and morphology of animal eyes in comparison with humans’. In this review, we highlight the differences in the trabecular meshwork (TM) tissue, lamina cribrosa (LC) region, optic nerve head (ONH) and the inner layer of the retina in mice, rats and monkeys. In comparison with humans, non-human primates show TM, retina and ONH that are anatomically almost identical. The rat model shows many similarities in the aqueous outflow pathway compared to humans. The mouse ONH lacks collagenous LC, and this finding is observed across different mouse strains. The tissue structure of the ONH in rodents is similar to that in humans, although the blood supply shows differences. The number of cells in the ganglion layer depends on the rodent strain. Despite some differences from humans, rodents are a good choice for studying different types of glaucoma, and the modeling method should be selected based on the experimental needs and the hypothesis being tested.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness worldwide and has been estimated to affect nearly 66 million people [1], a number that is expected to increase to 80 million by 2020 [2]. It is a group of ocular disorders associated with optic nerve degeneration and retinal ganglion cell death, leading to visual field loss and eventual blindness [3]. Despite several efforts and studies, the pathophysiology of glaucoma is not clearly understood.
A variety of animal models have been used to mimic different glaucomatous situations, including mouse [4,5], rat [5,6], rabbit [7], pig [8], cat [9,10], dog [10,11] and monkey models [12,13]. However, each has its own disadvantages and drawbacks, especially with regard to differences in eye anatomy and morphology in comparison with humans [14]. These differences not only exist in the anterior eye segment, but also in the lamina cribrosa (LC) region, the optic nerve head (ONH) and in the inner layer of the retina. In this paper, we attempt to review the anatomical differences in the rodents and primates being used in glaucoma research.

2. Comparative Anatomy and Composition of the Trabecular Meshwork and Schlemm’s Canal

The trabecular meshwork (TM) is located at the iridocorneal angle overlying Schlemm’s canal (SC) and regulates the outflow of the aqueous humor [15]. Vision loss in most forms of glaucoma is often caused by elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), which occurs upon abnormally high resistance to aqueous humor drainage via the TM and SC [16].Studies have reported changes in the histological morphology and extracellular matrix components of the TM tissue in glaucomatous patients’ eyes [17,18,19].
Conventional light and electron microscopy studies have previously demonstrated that rats possess a similar aqueous humor outflow pathway with an ultrastructure resembling that of primates [20,21,22]. This includes the TM and a prominent single SC, connected to the episcleral vasculature by trans-scleral collector channels [23] (Figure S1B). Taking advantage of these anatomical similarities, a model of chronically-elevated IOP was built by injecting hypertonic saline into one of the episcleral radical veins [24]. The TM in the rat eye is, however, far less intensive than that in the human eye and extends up to the spaces of Fontana [21]. Although the rat TM may be less capable of generating a high flow resistance because it is only a few cell layers thick, we still could observe a statistical decrease in IOP after TM ablation treatment [25].
The mouse models, as well as rat models, share many similarities with human eyes in the morphology of the anterior chamber angle. The TM of the C57BL/6 mouse is a thin (only three to four trabecular lamellae), triangular-shaped wedge of tissue that encircles the anterior chamber, immediately adjacent to a well-developed and continuous SC [26,27] (Figure S1A). Some of the TM lamellae attach to the pectinate ligament (PL) spanning between the peripheral cornea and iris root [28]. In addition to the angle structures, the mouse developmental sequence for other structures is similar to that in humans [29]. Although the uveoscleral outflow, not the conventional outflow, is the main aqueous humor drainage pathway in young mice, accounting for approximately 80% of the total outflow, such difference in outflow pathway will diminish sharply with age. The aqueous humor dynamics in aged mouse is approaching that in early middle aged human [30]. The similarities above suggest that the mouse may be a good model to study aqueous humor outflow in primates and in glaucoma.
The anterior part of the monkey trabecular meshwork is nearly organized exactly as in the human eyes [31] (Figure S1C,D). Under electron microscopy, the layer next to the inner wall is observed to be considerably constant and continuous within the middle and posterior part, while the discontinuities correspond to those found in human eyes [32]. With respect to the topography of the endothelium [33,34], no differences have been found in the size, configuration and cellular components of the endothelial cells and in the intercellular relationships. The main difference in the appearance of the SC between human and monkey eyes is the large amount of septa in the latter [32]. In general, the TM tissue and the SC in monkey and human eyes seem to be almost identical. The human TM consists of a network of collagen beams covered by endothelium-like cells, with extracellular matrix occupying the spaces between the beams [35]. It has been reported that the mouse TM contains a net of elastic (EL) fibers that spans the scleral sulcus and tethers together the CM, choroid, TM and the inner wall of the SC [28]. This EL net is similar to that found in primates [36,37]. Different animal models also share some similarities in the compositions of the cytoskeletal proteins of the TMs. Immunohistological analysis revealed that vimentin is expressed in the TM tissue of the rat and human [38], and α-smooth muscle actin [28,38,39,40,41] is expressed in the TM tissue of the mouse, rat, monkey and human (Table 1).

3. Comparative Anatomy and Composition of the Lamina Cribrosa

Although numerous other species, including rabbits [42], pigs [43], cats [44] and dogs [45], develop an LC structure, the mouse ONH lacks similar connective tissue bundles at the level of the sclera [46,47,48] (Figure S2A). This finding is independent of the different mouse strains analyzed. While this differs from human eyes, studies in glaucomatous mice might help identify the role of the LC in optic nerve damage in glaucoma.
It should be noted that single collagen bundles are present and form an LC-like structure in place of a well-developed, collagenous LC in the rat ONH. Unlike the mouse models, the quantity of LC seems to vary across rat strains: the brown Norway rat [49] (Figure S2B) and the Long Evans rat [50] were reported to have a substantial LC, whereas only sparse LC bundles were found in the PVG hooded rat [51] and Wistar rat [52]. However, these differences from primates do not diminish the popularity and utility of rats for studying the pathophysiological mechanisms of axonal injury from elevated IOP and in glaucoma.
Monkeys, without a doubt, show well-developed collagen fibers, which make up a marked multi-layered LC and a flat disc [48,53,54,55] (Figure S2C). Light microscopy results reveal that the anterior portion of the monkey LC is an extensive structure that occupies almost the entire ONH [56]. Fenestrated connective tissue sheets derived from the sclera form the main support for the posterior portion of the LC. The sheets consist of a dense collagenous tissue with pigment cells, while they often show elastic fibers in humans. The different values for the LC diameter are shown in Table 2.
Numerous papers have demonstrated the macromolecular components of the extracellular matrix of the LC. The cribriform plates are made up of a core of elastin fibers with collagen types I, III, VI and laminin and collagen type IV (basal membranes) along the laminar beam margins, astrocytes and vessels. This composition has so far only been studied in rats [49,52,58], monkeys [53,59,60,61] and humans [62,63,64,65]. Besides the above macromolecular components, chondroitin and dermatansulfate proteoglycans were observed in immunofluorescent and immunohistochemical analyses in the rodent [49], monkey [66] and human LC [67,68,69].
We can see that rodents and primates show similarities in the composition of the LC. However, more accurate quantitative techniques have shown that the amount of collagen type VI varies across species, with weakly-stained collagen type V and VI in the normal human LC [70] and intensely-stained collagen type VI in the normal rat LC [49,52].

4. Comparative Anatomy of the Central Retinal Vessels

In rodents, the central retinal artery (CRA) primarily arises from the ophthalmic artery, branches into two posterior ciliary arteries and obliquely enters the optic nerve (ON) through the scleral ring and choroid towards the center of the ONH [47,71,72] (Figure S3A,B). A peculiar and frequent finding is the presence of intra-arterial cushions [73,74] in rodent arteries before ramification, including the ophthalmic artery. In the mouse ophthalmic artery, a v-shaped cushion [47] is regularly located before the branching of the CRA that might functionally regulate the blood flow in this specific region [75]. Nevertheless, such structures have not been found in the human ophthalmic artery.
The central retinal vein (CRV) of the rat eye originates from the confluence of the major retinal veins at the ONH and receives blood from several capillary beds (Figure S3B). The CRV travels closer [47] and more posterior [72] to the ON than the artery and communicates with the choroidal venous system [72,76].
In primates, the CRA also branches off the ophthalmic artery, but enters the ON posteriorly to the LC in comparison to that in rodents [77] (Figure S3C). The CRV lies adjacent and parallel to the CRA with a distinct centripetal pattern through the LC. The CRV is connected with the choroidal circulation in the prelaminar region [78]. Both vessels branch in the center of the ONH, forming the main retinal vessels.

5. Comparative Anatomy of the Optic Nerve Head Blood Supply

Because vascular mechanisms may also contribute to glaucomatous optic neuropathy, it is important to determine optic nerve head perfusion in different glaucomatous models [78,79]. On the basis of the results obtained with corrosion cast preparations and serial sections, we summarize the blood supply of the ONH in different species (Table 3).
In the mouse, both corrosion cast preparations and serial sections reveal that the non-myelinated portion of the ON is supplied exclusively by the CRA without forming any branches [47] (Figure S3A). Neither the choroid nor the pial vessels contribute to this region. Other than the arterial Zinn-Haller ring inhuman eyes, there are no additional arterial circles in mouse eyes.
The microvasculature of the rat ONH bears several similarities to that of the mouse, with most of the vessels derived from the retina, but the posterior ciliary arteries and some branches emanating from the choroid vessels are also found within the ONH [71,72,76] (Figure S3B). In contrast to mouse eyes, the CRA in rat eyes supplies blood not only tithe surface nerve fiber layer, but also tithe prelaminar, laminar and retrolaminar regions [76]. The venous system of the rat ONH includes CRV and optic sheath veins. The association of nerve sheath veins with the choroid represents an important difference from primates [72]. There are controversial opinions regarding the presence of the arterial Zinn-Haller ring in rat eyes: some authors have observed a similar arterial circular structure [72], while others have reported that they could not find it [76]. The disagreement might be caused by the difficulty in visualization of the ONH angioarchitecture; therefore, additional comparative studies are needed to investigate ONH blood supply in rats.
Hayreh conducted a series of studies [78,80,81,82] to update the knowledge of the vascular supply of the ONH in primates (Figure S3C). In his recent report [81], he describes the arterial supply of the ONH based on four regions from the anterior to the posterior aspect: (1) the surface nerve fiber layer is supplied by retinal arterioles; in some cases, the temporal region may instead be supplied by the posterior ciliary artery (PCA) circulation; (2) the prelaminar region is supplied by the fine centripetal branches from the peripapillary choroid; (3) the LC region is entirely supplied by centripetal branches from the short PCAs or the Zinn-Haller circle; (4) the blood supply to the retrolaminar region is provided by both the pial vascular plexus and the branches of CRA. The venous drainage of the ONH is relatively simple; it essentially occurs via the CRV, except that the prelaminar region also drains into the peripapillarychoroidal veins.

6. Comparative Anatomy of the Ganglion Cell Layer

Despite the basically consistent gross morphology of the retinal layers in all animals used for glaucoma research, some differences can be observed in the inner retina, mainly in the appearance of the ganglion cell layer (GCL). There are three important types of cells in the retina: (1) the photoreceptor cells (rods and cones), which detect and convey information to secondary neurons; (2) the ganglion cells, whose dendrites extend into the inner plexiform layer, and axons to make up the optic nerve; and (3) the displaced amacrine cells, whose specific role in the GCL has not yet been determined. We focus our attention mainly on the latter two cell types.
The mouse retina is strongly rod-dominated, with a higher density than that in monkeys [83,84]. At the level of the GCL, the numbers of ganglion cells are highly variable among different mouse strains, ranging from 32,000 to 87,000 [85,86]. Genetic factors play a vital role in controlling this variation [86]. One study of the C57/BL6 mouse retina shows that the fraction of ganglion cells and displaced amacrine cells is 41% ± 4% and 59% ± 4% in the ganglion cell layer [83].
The strain variations in the numbers of ganglion cells are also remarkable in rats, with pronounced differences in the number of optic nerve fibers between pigmented rats (around 70,000) and albino rats (more than 100,000) [87,88]. Based on the results of different studies, the total number of ganglion cells in various rat strains is about 70,000 to 120,000 [87,88,89,90,91]. The amacrine cells account for approximately 50% of the cells in the ganglion cell layer [92], and the density changes with eccentricity, ranging from 1700 centrally to 600 cells per mm2 in the periphery [93].
The number of ganglion cells in non-human primate eyes (cynomolgus monkey: 850,000 to 1,300,000 [94]; Cercopithecus aethiops: 1,220,000 [95]; rhesus monkey: 850,000 to 1,500,000 [94,96]; cebus monkey: 1,340,000 to 1,400,000 [97]) is comparable to that in human eyes (700,000 to 1,500,000 [98]). The distribution of displaced amacrine cells in the monkey GCL is distinctly non-uniform in different regions [99]: the concentration is lower (5% of all neurons) in the foveal region and higher in the nasal (up to 30%) and temporal regions (50%). The human retina shows a similar distribution pattern, with 3% displaced amacrine cells in the foveal region and up to 80% in the peripheral part [98].The quantitative data of the ganglion cell layer in different species is summarized in Table 4.

7. Summary of the Rodent and Primate Models Commonly Used for Glaucoma Research

Since there are several types of glaucoma, we have summarized the mode and mechanisms employed indifferent animal models in relation to the human clinical glaucoma classification (Table 5).

8. Conclusions

A comprehensive evaluation of rodent and primate models depends on the degree of similarity between the model and the human condition, as well as practical and economic considerations.
Non-human primates are the most appropriate animals for studying glaucoma because of the close phylogeny and high homology with humans. They have an almost anatomically identical TM, retina and ONH. However, we cannot ignore the disadvantages posed by the strict ethical considerations, the high cost of obtaining these animals, the need for special housing facilities and the limited supply. These limitations restrict their utility in large-scale experiments.
As mentioned above, the mouse ONH lacks a collagenous LC that may either provide significant protection for optic nerve fibers or actively contribute to axonal damage. Therefore, mouse models cannot be used for LC-specific functional investigations. However, some researchers have found that experimental IOP elevation can lead to optic nerve damage and RGC loss in mice, which suggests that the LC is not an essential influencing factor for the process of glaucoma [119,120,121]. The composition of mouse and human ONH is similar, although the two show clear differences in blood supply. In addition, the number of cells in the ganglion layer differs across mouse strains. Since mice are small animals, the size of their eyes makes it difficult to simulate the complex surgeries performed in humans. Despite these disadvantages, the mouse is one of the most widely-used models for glaucoma. The reasons include the high degree of conservation between mice and human genomes, the availability of mature technology for genetic manipulation [122] and the convenience of breeding the animals. Mice are inexpensive, and their eyes are easy to obtain, so the experimental sample numbers can be large.
In contrast to other non-primate models, the rat shares similar anatomical and developmental characteristics of the anterior chamber with humans, especially in the aqueous outflow pathway. Similar to mice, strain differences seem to play an important role when investigating the role of the LC. The vascular supply of the ONH should be taken into account when comparing findings with the human situation. The advantages of using rats also include easy laboratory support, availability of genetic manipulation tools and ease of using large samples.
Since the mechanisms underlying glaucoma differ among animal models [123], the results obtained from a particular model should not be simply generalized and should be interpreted within the context of that model. Rodents are a good choice for studying different types of glaucoma, and modeling methods should be selected on the basis of the experimental needs and the hypothesis being tested.

Supplementary Materials

The supplementary materials can be found at www.mdpi.com/2411-5150/1/1/4/s1.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Grants 81170842, 81471744 and 81470632.

Author Contributions

Hong Zhang conceived of the study. Liwen Chen and Yin Zhao wrote and revised the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Quigley, H.A. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1996, 80, 389–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Quigley, H.A. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2006, 90, 262–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Halpern, D.L.; Grosskreutz, C.L. Glaucomatous optic neuropathy: Mechanisms of disease. Ophthalmol. Clin. N. Am. 2002, 15, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. John, S.W.; Smith, R.S.; Savinova, O.V.; Hawes, N.L.; Chang, B.; Turnbull, D.; Davisson, M.; Roderick, T.H.; Heckenlively, J.R. Essential iris atrophy, pigment dispersion, and glaucoma in DBA/2J mice. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1998, 39, 951–962. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Pang, I.H.; Clark, A.F. Rodent models for glaucoma retinopathy and optic neuropathy. J. Glaucoma 2007, 16, 483–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Johnson, T.V.; Tomarev, S.I. Rodent models of glaucoma. Brain Res. Bull. 2010, 81, 349–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kolker, A.E.; Moses, R.A.; Constant, M.A.; Becker, B. The development of glaucoma in rabbits. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1963, 2, 316–321. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ruiz-Ederra, J.; Garcia, M.; Hernandez, M.; Urcola, H.; Hernandez-Barbachano, E.; Araiz, J.; Vecino, E. The pig eye as a novel model of glaucoma. Exp. Eye Res. 2005, 81, 561–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Dietrich, U. Feline glaucomas. Clin. Tech. Small Anim. Pract. 2005, 20, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Brooks, D.E. Glaucoma in the dog and cat. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 1990, 20, 775–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gelatt, K.N.; Peiffer, R.J.; Gwin, R.M.; Gum, G.G.; Williams, L.W. Clinical manifestations of inherited glaucoma in the beagle. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1977, 16, 1135–1142. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Rasmussen, C.A.; Kaufman, P.L. Primate glaucoma models. J. Glaucoma 2005, 14, 311–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Burgoyne, C.F. The non-human primate experimental glaucoma model. Exp. Eye Res. 2015, 141, 57–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bouhenni, R.A.; Dunmire, J.; Sewell, A.; Edward, D.P. Animal models of glaucoma. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012, 2012, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gong, H.; Tripathi, R.C.; Tripathi, B.J. Morphology of the aqueous outflow pathway. Microsc. Res. Tech. 1996, 33, 336–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Goel, M.; Picciani, R.G.; Lee, R.K.; Bhattacharya, K.S. Aqueous humor dynamics: A review. Open Ophthalmol. J. 2010, 4, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Alvarado, J.A.; Murphy, C.G. Outflow obstruction in pigmentary and primary open angle glaucoma. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1992, 110, 1769–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lutjen-Drecoll, E.; Futa, R.; Rohen, J.W. Ultrahistochemical studies on tangential sections of the trabecular meshwork in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1981, 21, 563–573. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Tan, J.C.; Peters, D.M.; Kaufman, P.L. Recent developments in understanding the pathophysiology of elevated intraocularpressure. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 2006, 17, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Tripathi, R.C. Ultrastructure of the exit pathway of the aqueous in lower mammals: (A preliminary report on the “angular aqueous plexus”). Exp. Eye Res. 1971, 12, 311–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Van der Zypen, E. Experimental morphological study on structure and function of the filtration angel of the rat eye. Ophthalmologica 1977, 174, 285–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. McMenamin, P.G.; Al-Shakarchi, M.J. The effect of various levels of intraocular pressure on the rat aqueous outflow system. J. Anat. 1989, 162, 67–82. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Morrison, J.C.; Fraunfelder, F.W.; Milne, S.T.; Moore, C.G. Limbal microvasculature of the rat eye. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1995, 36, 751–756. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Morrison, J.C.; Moore, C.G.; Deppmeier, L.M.; Gold, B.G.; Meshul, C.K.; Johnson, E.C. A rat model of chronic pressure-induced optic nerve damage. Exp. Eye Res. 1997, 64, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, Z.; Dhaliwal, A.S.; Tseng, H.; Kim, J.D.; Schuman, J.S.; Weinreb, R.N.; Loewen, N.A. Outflow tract ablation using a conditionally cytotoxic feline immunodeficiency viral vector. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 935–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Johnson, A.W.; Ammar, D.A.; Kahook, M.Y. Two-Photon imaging of the mouse eye. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 4098–4105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ko, M.K.; Tan, J.C. Contractile markers distinguish structures of the mouse aqueous drainage tract. Mol. Vis. 2013, 19, 2561–2570. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Overby, D.R.; Bertrand, J.; Schicht, M.; Paulsen, F.; Stamer, W.D.; Lutjen-Drecoll, E. The structure of the trabecular meshwork, its connections to the ciliary muscle, and the effect of pilocarpine on outflow facility in mice. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 3727–3736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Smith, R.S.; Zabaleta, A.; Savinova, O.V.; John, S.W. The mouse anterior chamber angle and trabecular meshwork develop without cell death. BMC Dev. Biol. 2001, 1, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Millar, J.C.; Phan, T.N.; Pang, I.H.; Clark, A.F. Strain and age effects on aqueous humor dynamics in the mouse. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015, 56, 5764–5776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Yan, Z.; Tian, Z.; Chen, H.; Deng, S.; Lin, J.; Liao, H.; Yang, X.; Ge, J.; Zhuo, Y. Analysis of a method for establishing a model with more stable chronic glaucoma in rhesus monkeys. Exp. Eye Res. 2015, 131, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Holmberg, K.S. Schlemm’s canal and the trabecular meshwork. An electron microscopic study of the normal structure in man and monkey (Cercopithecus ethiops). Doc. Opthalmol. 1965, 19, 339–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rohen, J. The histologic structure of the chamber angle in primates. Am. J. Opthalmol. 1961, 52, 529–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Epstein, D.L.; Rohen, J.W. Morphology of the trabecular meshwork and inner-wall endothelium after cationized ferritin perfusion in the monkey eye. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1991, 32, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Tian, B.; Geiger, B.; Epstein, D.L.; Kaufman, P.L. Cytoskeletal involvement in the regulation of aqueous humor outflow. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000, 41, 619–623. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Rohen, J.W.; Futa, R.; Lutjen-Drecoll, E. The fine structure of the cribriform meshwork in normal and glaucomatous eyes asseen in tangential sections. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1981, 21, 574–585. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Hann, C.R.; Fautsch, M.P. The elastin fiber system between and adjacent to collector channels in the humanjuxtacanalicular tissue. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Chen, C.; Yeh, L.; Liu, C.; Kao, W.W.Y.; Samples, J.R.; Lin, S.; Hu, F.; Wang, I. Morphological differences between the trabecular meshworks of zebrafish and mammals. Curr. Eye Res. 2008, 33, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Overby, D.R.; Bertrand, J.; Tektas, O.Y.; Boussommier-Calleja, A.; Schicht, M.; Ethier, C.R.; Woodward, D.F.; Stamer, W.D.; Lutjen-Drecoll, E. Ultrastructural changes associated with dexamethasone-induced ocular hypertension in mice. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 4922–4933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. De Kater, A.W.; Spurr-Michaud, S.J.; Gipson, I.K. Localization of smooth muscle myosin-containing cells in the aqueous outflow pathway. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1990, 31, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  41. De Kater, A.W.; Shahsafaei, A.; Epstein, D.L. Localization of smooth muscle and nonmuscle actin isoforms in the human aqueous outflow pathway. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1992, 33, 424–429. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Bunt-Milam, A.H.; Dennis, M.J.; Bensinger, R.E. Optic nerve head axonal transport in rabbits with hereditary glaucoma. Exp. Eye Res. 1987, 44, 537–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Brooks, D.E.; Arellano, E.; Kubilis, P.S.; Komaromy, A.M. Histomorphometry of the porcine scleral lamina cribrosa surface. Vet. Ophthalmol. 1998, 1, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Radius, R.L.; Bade, B. The anatomy at the lamina cribrosa in the normal cat eye. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1982, 100, 1658–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Brooks, D.E.; Samuelson, D.A.; Gelatt, K.N.; Smith, P.J. Morphologic changes in the lamina cribrosa of beagles with primary open-angle glaucoma. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1989, 50, 936–941. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Morrison, J.C.; Johnson, E.; Cepurna, W.O. Rat models for glaucoma research. Prog. Brain Res. 2008, 173, 285–301. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. May, C.A.; Lutjen-Drecoll, E. Morphology of the murine optic nerve. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002, 43, 2206–2212. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Tansley, K. Comparison of the lamina cribrosa in mammalian species with good and with indifferent vision. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1956, 40, 178–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Pazos, M.; Yang, H.; Gardiner, S.K.; Cepurna, W.O.; Johnson, E.C.; Morrison, J.C.; Burgoyne, C.F. Rat optic nerve head anatomy within 3D histomorphometric reconstructions of normal control eyes. Exp Eye Res. 2015, 139, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Hildebrand, C.; Remahl, S.; Waxman, S.G. Axo-Glial relations in the retina-optic nerve junction of the adult rat: Electron-Microscopic observations. J. Neurocytol. 1985, 14, 597–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Johansson, J.O. The lamina cribrosa in the eyes of rats, hamsters, gerbils and guinea pigs. Cell Tissues Organs 1987, 128, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. May, C.A. The optic nerve head region of the aged rat: An immunohistochemical investigation. Curr. Eye Res. 2003, 26, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Morrison, J.C.; Jerdan, J.A.; L’Hernault, N.L.; Quigley, H.A. The extracellular matrix composition of the monkey optic nerve head. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1988, 29, 1141–1150. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Yang, H.; Downs, J.C.; Girkin, C.; Sakata, L.; Bellezza, A.; Thompson, H.; Burgoyne, C.F. 3-D Histomorphometry of the normal and early glaucomatous monkey optic nerve head: Lamina cribrosa and peripapillary scleral position and thickness. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007, 48, 4597–4607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Downs, J.C.; Yang, H.; Girkin, C.; Sakata, L.; Bellezza, A.; Thompson, H.; Burgoyne, C.F. Three-Dimensionalhistomorphometry of the normal and early glaucomatous monkey optic nerve head: Neural canal and subarachnoid space architecture. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007, 48, 3195–3208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Anderson, D.R. Ultrastructure of human and monkey lamina cribrosa and optic nerve head. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1969, 82, 800–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Jonas, J.B.; Mardin, C.Y.; Schlotzer-Schrehardt, U.; Naumann, G.O. Morphometry of the human lamina cribrosa surface. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1991, 32, 401–405. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Johnson, E.C.; Morrison, J.C.; Farrell, S.; Deppmeier, L.; Moore, C.G.; McGinty, M.R. The effect of chronically elevated intraocular pressure on the rat optic nerve head extracellular matrix. Exp. Eye Res. 1996, 62, 663–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Morrison, J.C.; Dorman-Pease, M.E.; Dunkelberger, G.R.; Quigley, H.A. Optic nerve head extracellular matrix in primary optic atrophy and experimental glaucoma. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1990, 108, 1020–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Quigley, H.A.; Dorman-Pease, M.E.; Brown, A.E. Quantitative study of collagen and elastin of the optic nerve head and sclera inhuman and experimental monkey glaucoma. Curr. Eye Res. 1991, 10, 877–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Fukuchi, T.; Sawaguchi, S.; Hara, H.; Shirakashi, M.; Iwata, K. Extracellular matrix changes of the optic nerve lamina cribrosa in monkey eyes with experimentally chronic glaucoma. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 1992, 230, 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Hernandez, M.R.; Igoe, F.; Neufeld, A.H. Extracellular matrix of the human optic nerve head. Am. J. Opthalmol. 1986, 102, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hernandez, M.R.; Luo, X.X.; Igoe, F.; Neufeld, A.H. Extracellular matrix of the human lamina cribrosa. Am. J. Opthalmol. 1987, 104, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tengroth, B.; Rehnberg, M.; Amitzboll, T. A comparative analysis of the collagen type and distribution in the trabecular meshwork, sclera, lamina cribrosa and the optic nerve in the human eye. Acta Ophthalmol. 1985, 173, 91–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Albon, J.; Karwatowski, W.S.; Easty, D.L.; Sims, T.J.; Duance, V.C. Age related changes in the non-collagenous components of the extracellular matrix of the human lamina cribrosa. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2000, 84, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Fukuchi, T.; Sawaguchi, S.; Yue, B.Y.; Iwata, K.; Hara, H.; Kaiya, T. Sulfated proteoglycans in the lamina cribrosa of normal monkey eyes and monkey eyes with laser-induced glaucoma. Exp. Eye Res. 1994, 58, 231–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Sawaguchi, S.; Yue, B.Y.; Fukuchi, T.; Iwata, K.; Kaiya, T. Sulfated proteoglycans in the human lamina cribrosa. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1992, 33, 2388–2398. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  68. Sawaguchi, S.; Yue, B.Y.; Fukuchi, T.; Iwata, K.; Kaiya, T. Age-Related changes of sulfated proteoglycans in the human lamina cribrosa. Curr. Eye Res. 1993, 12, 685–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Caparas, V.L.; Cintron, C.; Hernandez-Neufeld, M.R. Immunohistochemistry of proteoglycans in human lamina cribrosa. Am. J. Opthalmol. 1991, 112, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jeffery, G.; Evans, A.; Albon, J.; Duance, V.; Neal, J.; Dawidek, G. The human optic nerve: Fascicular organisation and connective tissue types alongthe extra-fascicular matrix. Anat. Embryol. (Berl.) 1995, 191, 491–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Bisaria, K.K.; Sud, S.D. The central retinal artery in the albino rats (a histological study). Indian J. Opthalmol. 1977, 24, 23–26. [Google Scholar]
  72. Morrison, J.C.; Johnson, E.C.; Cepurna, W.O.; Funk, R.H.W. Microvasculature of the rat optic nerve head. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1999, 40, 1702–1709. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  73. Lieberman, M.F.; Maumenee, A.E.; Green, W.R. Histologic studies of the vasculature of the anterior optic nerve. Am. J. Opthalmol. 1976, 82, 405–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Pannarale, L.; Onori, P.; Ripani, M.; Gaudio, E. Precapillary patterns and perivascular cells in the retinal microvasculature. A scanning electron microscope study. J. Anat. 1996, 188, 693–703. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  75. Lassmann, H.; Pamperl, H.; Stockinger, G. Morphological-functional aspects of intima pads in the rat ophthalmic artery. Z. Mikrosk. Anat. Forsch. 1972, 85, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  76. Sugiyama, K.; Gu, Z.B.; Kawase, C.; Yamamoto, T.; Kitazawa, Y. Optic nerve and peripapillarychoroidal microvasculature of the rat eye. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1999, 40, 3084–3090. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  77. Hayreh, S.S. The blood supply of the optic nerve head and the evaluation of it—Myth and reality. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2001, 20, 563–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hayreh, S.S. Blood supply of the optic nerve head and its role in optic atrophy, glaucoma, and oedema of the optic disc. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1969, 53, 721–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Goldberg, I.; Hollows, F.C.; Kass, M.A.; Becker, B. Systemic factors in patients with low-tension glaucoma. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1981, 65, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Hayreh, S.S. Anatomy and physiology of the optic nerve head. Trans. Am. Acad. Ophthalmol. Otolaryngol. 1974, 78, P240–P254. [Google Scholar]
  81. Hayreh, S.S. Microangioarchitecture of optic papilla. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 1989, 33, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. Hayreh, S.S. Blood supply of the optic nerve head. Ophthalmologica 1996, 210, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Jeon, C.; Strettoi, E.; Masland, R.H. The major cell populations of the mouse retina. J. Neurosci. 1998, 18, 8936. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  84. Carter-Dawson, L.D.; LaVail, M.M. Rods and cones in the mouse retina. I. Structural analysis using light and electron microscopy. J. Comp. Neurol. 1979, 188, 245–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Drager, U.C.; Olsen, J.F. Ganglion cell distribution in the retina of the mouse. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1981, 20, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. Williams, R.W.; Strom, R.C.; Rice, D.S.; Goldowitz, D. Genetic and environmental control of variation in retinal ganglion cell number in mice. J. Neurosci. 1996, 16, 7193–7205. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  87. Hunter, A.; Bedi, K.S. A quantitative morphological study of interstrain variation in the developing rat optic nerve. J. Comp. Neurol. 1986, 245, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Cavallotti, C.; Cavallotti, D.; Pescosolido, N.; Pacella, E. Age-Related changes in rat optic nerve: Morphological studies. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 2003, 32, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Potts, R.A.; Dreher, B.; Bennett, M.R. The loss of ganglion cells in the developing retina of the rat. Brain Res. 1982, 255, 481–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Fukuda, Y.; Sugimoto, T.; Shirokawa, T. Strain differences in quantitative analysis of the rat optic nerve. Exp. Neurol. 1982, 75, 525–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Garcia-Ayuso, D.; Salinas-Navarro, M.; Agudo, M.; Cuenca, N.; Pinilla, I.; Vidal-Sanz, M.; Villegas-Perez, M.P. Retinal ganglion cell numbers and delayed retinal ganglion cell death in the P23H rat retina. Exp. Eye Res. 2010, 91, 800–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Perry, V.H. Evidence for an amacrine cell system in the ganglion cell layer of the rat retina. Neuroscience 1981, 6, 931–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Voigt, T. Cholinergic amacrine cells in the rat retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 1986, 248, 19–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Furuyoshi, N.; Furuyoshi, M.; May, C.A.; Hayreh, S.S.; Alm, A.; Lutjen-Drecoll, E. Vascular and glial changes in the retrolaminar optic nerve in glaucomatous monkey eyes. Ophthalmologica 2000, 214, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Herbin, M.; Boire, D.; Ptito, M. Size and distribution of retinal ganglion cells in the St. Kitts green monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops sabeus). J. Comp. Neurol. 1997, 383, 459–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kim, C.B.; Tom, B.W.; Spear, P.D. Effects of aging on the densities, numbers, and sizes of retinal ganglion cells in rhesus monkey. Neurobiol. Aging 1996, 17, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Silveira, L.C.; Picanco-Diniz, C.W.; Sampaio, L.F.; Oswaldo-Cruz, E. Retinal ganglion cell distribution in the cebus monkey: A comparison with the cortical magnification factors. Vis. Res. 1989, 29, 1471–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Curcio, C.A.; Allen, K.A. Topography of ganglion cells in human retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 1990, 300, 5–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Wassle, H.; Grunert, U.; Rohrenbeck, J.; Boycott, B.B. Retinal ganglion cell density and cortical magnification factor in the primate. Vis. Res. 1990, 30, 1897–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Senatorov, V.; Malyukova, I.; Fariss, R.; Wawrousek, E.F.; Swaminathan, S.; Sharan, S.K.; Tomarev, S. Expression of mutated mouse myocilin induces open-angle glaucoma in transgenic mice. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26, 11903–11914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Aihara, M.; Lindsey, J.D.; Weinreb, R.N. Ocular hypertension in mice with a targeted type I collagen mutation. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003, 44, 1581–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Mabuchi, F.; Lindsey, J.D.; Aihara, M.; Mackey, M.R.; Weinreb, R.N. Optic nerve damage in mice with a targeted type I collagen mutation. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004, 45, 1841–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Sawaguchi, K.; Nakamura, Y.; Nakamura, Y.; Sakai, H.; Sawaguchi, S. Myocilin gene expression in the trabecular meshwork of rats in a steroid-inducedocular hypertension model. Ophthalmic Res. 2005, 37, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Toris, C.B.; Zhan, G.L.; Wang, Y.L.; Zhao, J.; McLaughlin, M.A.; Camras, C.B.; Yablonski, M.E. Aqueous humor dynamics in monkeys with laser-induced glaucoma. J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther. 2000, 16, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Weber, A.J.; Zelenak, D. Experimental glaucoma in the primate induced by latex microspheres. J. Neurosci. Methods 2001, 111, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Quigley, H.A.; Addicks, E.M. Chronic experimental glaucoma in primates. I. Production of elevated intraocularpressure by anterior chamber injection of autologous ghost red blood cells. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1980, 19, 126–136. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  107. Fujikawa, K.; Iwata, T.; Inoue, K.; Akahori, M.; Kadotani, H.; Fukaya, M.; Watanabe, M.; Chang, Q.; Barnett, E.M.; Swat, W. VAV2 and VAV3 as candidate disease genes for spontaneous glaucoma in mice and humans. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Gross, R.L.; Ji, J.; Chang, P.; Pennesi, M.E.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Wu, S.M. A mouse model of elevated intraocular pressure: Retina and optic nerve findings. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 2003, 101, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  109. Ruiz-Ederra, J.; Verkman, A.S. Mouse model of sustained elevation in intraocular pressure produced by episcleral vein occlusion. Exp. Eye Res. 2006, 82, 879–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Shareef, S.R.; Garcia-Valenzuela, E.; Salierno, A.; Walsh, J.; Sharma, S.C. Chronic ocular hypertension following episcleral venous occlusion in rats. Exp. Eye Res. 1995, 61, 379–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Yu, S.; Tanabe, T.; Yoshimura, N. A rat model of glaucoma induced by episcleral vein ligation. Exp. Eye Res. 2006, 83, 758–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Levkovitch-Verbin, H.; Quigley, H.A.; Martin, K.R.; Valenta, D.; Baumrind, L.A.; Pease, M.E. Translimbal laser photocoagulation to the trabecular meshwork as a model of glaucoma in rats. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002, 43, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  113. Moreno, M.C.; Marcos, H.J.; Oscar, C.J.; Sande, P.H.; Campanelli, J.; Jaliffa, C.O.; Benozzi, J.; Rosenstein, R.E. A new experimental model of glaucoma in rats through intracameral injections of hyaluronic acid. Exp. Eye Res. 2005, 81, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Bejjani, B.A.; Lewis, R.A.; Tomey, K.F.; Anderson, K.L.; Dueker, D.K.; Jabak, M.; Astle, W.F.; Otterud, B.; Leppert, M.; Lupski, J.R. Mutations in CYP1B1, the gene for cytochrome P4501B1, are the predominant cause of primary congenital glaucoma in Saudi Arabia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1998, 62, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Libby, R.T.; Smith, R.S.; Savinova, O.V.; Zabaleta, A.; Martin, J.E.; Gonzalez, F.J.; John, S.W. Modification of ocular defects in mouse developmental glaucoma models by tyrosinase. Science 2003, 299, 1578–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Young, C.; Festing, M.F.; Barnett, K.C. Buphthalmos (congenital glaucoma) in the rat. Lab. Anim. 1974, 8, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Naskar, R.; Thanos, S. Retinal gene profiling in a hereditary rodent model of elevated intraocular pressure. Mol. Vis. 2006, 12, 1199–1210. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  118. Chang, B.; Smith, R.S.; Hawes, N.L.; Anderson, M.G.; Zabaleta, A.; Savinova, O.; Roderick, T.H.; Heckenlively, J.R.; Davisson, M.T.; John, S.W. Interacting loci cause severe iris atrophy and glaucoma in DBA/2J mice. Nat. Genet. 1999, 21, 405–409. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  119. Buckingham, B.P.; Inman, D.M.; Lambert, W.; Oglesby, E.; Calkins, D.J.; Steele, M.R.; Vetter, M.L.; Marsh-Armstrong, N.; Horner, P.J. Progressive ganglion cell degeneration precedes neuronal loss in a mouse model of glaucoma. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 2735–2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Filippopoulos, T.; Danias, J.; Chen, B.; Podos, S.M.; Mittag, T.W. Topographic and morphologic analyses of retinal ganglion cell loss in old DBA/2NNia mice. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006, 47, 1968–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Nagaraju, M.; Saleh, M.; Porciatti, V. IOP-Dependent retinal ganglion cell dysfunction in glaucomatous DBA/2J mice. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007, 48, 4573–4579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Fernandes, K.A.; Harder, J.M.; Williams, P.A.; Rausch, R.L.; Kiernan, A.E.; Nair, K.S.; Anderson, M.G.; John, S.W.; Howell, G.R.; Libby, R.T. Using genetic mouse models to gain insight into glaucoma: Past results and future possibilities. Exp. Eye Res. 2015, 141, 42–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Ishikawa, M.; Yoshitomi, T.; Zorumski, C.F.; Izumi, Y. Experimentally induced mammalian models of glaucoma. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 281214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Boussommier-Calleja, A.; Bertrand, J.; Woodward, D.F.; Ethier, C.R.; Stamer, W.D.; Overby, D.R. Pharmacologic manipulation of conventional outflow facility in ex vivo mouse eyes. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012, 53, 5838–5845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Buie, L.K.; Karim, M.Z.; Smith, M.H.; Borras, T. Development of a model of elevated intraocular pressure in rats by gene transfer of bone morphogenetic protein 2. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013, 54, 5441–5455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. McKee, C.T.; Wood, J.A.; Shah, N.M.; Fischer, M.E.; Reilly, C.M.; Murphy, C.J.; Russell, P. The effect of biophysical attributes of the ocular trabecular meshwork associated with glaucoma on the cell response to therapeutic agents. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 2417–2423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Fujita, Y.; Imagawa, T.; Uehara, M. Comparative study of the lamina cribrosa and the pial septa in the vertebrate optic nerve and their relationship to the myelinated axons. Tissue Cell 2000, 32, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Strouthidis, N.G.; Fortune, B.; Yang, H.; Sigal, I.A.; Burgoyne, C.F. Longitudinal change detected by spectral domain optical coherence tomography in the optic nerve head and peripapillary retina in experimental glaucoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 1206–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Sigal, I.A.; Flanagan, J.G.; Lathrop, K.L.; Tertinegg, I.; Bilonick, R. Human lamina cribrosa insertion and age. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012, 53, 6870–6879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Composition of the trabecular meshwork (TM) in different species.
Table 1. Composition of the trabecular meshwork (TM) in different species.
SpeciesComposition of TM
Elastic FibersVimentinα-Smooth Muscle Actin
Mouse+N/A+
RatN/A++
Monkey+N/A+
Human+++
+ = positive expressed; N/A = not reported.
Table
Table 2. Presence and diameter of the lamina cribrosa (LC) in different species.
Table 2. Presence and diameter of the lamina cribrosa (LC) in different species.
SpeciesPresence of LCDiameter of LC/Optic Nerve at the Level of the Sclera
Mouse–193 ± 8 μm
Rat(+)201 ± 1 μm
Monkey+1717 ± 21 μm
Human [57]+1580 ± 210 μm
– = not present; (+) = faintly present; + = well developed.
Table
Table 3. Blood supply to the optic nerve head region.
Table 3. Blood supply to the optic nerve head region.
SpeciesCentral Retinal ArteryChoroidPial Vessels
Mouse+−−
Rat+(+)(+)
Monkey+++
Human+(+)+
− = no, (+) = possible, + = clear.
Table
Table 4. The quantitative data of the ganglion cell layer. GCL, ganglion cell layer.
Table 4. The quantitative data of the ganglion cell layer. GCL, ganglion cell layer.
SpeciesGanglion Cell NumberPercentage of Amacrine Cells of the GCL
Mouse32,000 to 87,00059%
Rat70,000 to 120,00050%
Monkey850,000 to 1,500,000Fovea 5%, nasal 30%, temporal 50%
Human700,000 to 1,500,000Fovea 3%, peripheral 80%
Table
Table 5. Summary of rodent and primate models commonly used for glaucoma research.
Table 5. Summary of rodent and primate models commonly used for glaucoma research.
Glaucoma TypeSpeciesMethodReference
POAGMouseTransgenic mouse with myocilin mutation[100]
Transgenic mouse with type I collagen mutation[101,102]
RatApplication of topical dexamethasone to rat eyes[103]
MonkeyLaser photocoagulation of entire TM[104]
Intracameral injection of sterilelatex microspheres[105]
Intracameral injection of autologous fixed red blood cells[106]
PACGMouseTransgenic mouse with Vav2/Vav3 deficiency[107]
Laser photocoagulation of the episcleral and limbal veins[108]
Cauterization of episcleral veins[109]
RatCauterization of episcleral veins[110]
Ligation of episcleral veins[111]
Laser photocoagulation of TM and episcleral veins[112]
Episcleral veins injection of hypertonic saline[24]
Intracameral injection of hyaluronic acid[113]
PCGMouseTransgenic mouse with CYP1B1 mutation[114]
Transgenic mouse with CYP1B1 and Tyr mutation[115]
RatSpontaneous inheritance of WAG strain[116]
Spontaneous inheritance of RCS-rdy-strain[117]
PigmentaryMouseDBA/2J strain[118]
POAG: primaryopenangle glaucoma; PACG: primary angle closure glaucoma; PCG: primary congenital glaucoma.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, L.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, H. Comparative Anatomy of the Trabecular Meshwork, the Optic Nerve Head and the Inner Retina in Rodent and Primate Models Used for Glaucoma Research. Vision 2017, 1, 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision1010004

AMA Style

Chen L, Zhao Y, Zhang H. Comparative Anatomy of the Trabecular Meshwork, the Optic Nerve Head and the Inner Retina in Rodent and Primate Models Used for Glaucoma Research. Vision. 2017; 1(1):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision1010004

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Liwen, Yin Zhao, and Hong Zhang. 2017. "Comparative Anatomy of the Trabecular Meshwork, the Optic Nerve Head and the Inner Retina in Rodent and Primate Models Used for Glaucoma Research" Vision 1, no. 1: 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision1010004

APA Style

Chen, L., Zhao, Y., & Zhang, H. (2017). Comparative Anatomy of the Trabecular Meshwork, the Optic Nerve Head and the Inner Retina in Rodent and Primate Models Used for Glaucoma Research. Vision, 1(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision1010004

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop