Technological Features of Construction and Reconstruction of Geotechnical Structures in the Arctic Zone
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- 1.
- The production plan for roadbed construction can be diverse and includes work on both new and operating facilities (Figure 1). Geotechnical engineering and new construction technology are designed to carry out work in conditions of frozen soil with low-temperature permafrost (the first principle) and with the assumption of the thawing of high-temperature permafrost soils (the second principle). Both principles include structural and technological solutions for safety and protection against the degradation of new natural and transport systems at all life cycle phases. New construction is scheduled on the Obskaya–Salekhard section, and changes will take place on the Nadym–Pangody section. When reconstructing the roadbed of operating Pangody–Novy Urengoy–Korotchaevo railway lines, it is necessary to take into account the temperature patterns in the base of these structures.
- 2.
- The use of intensive process parameters at the subgrade base depends on the presence of dangerous cryogenic processes and phenomena that are activated during the construction period and lead to a decrease in the bearing capacity of the subgrade support. With this, excavation in frozen or thawing soils is possible only with the use of heavy equipment with high loads. Moreover, in accordance with [11], soil compaction should be carried out with a load close to the limit of their strength. These strict safety requirements for incomplete and unprotected structures are boundary conditions for the development of process parameters.
- 3.
- The risks of a dangerous combination of the load limits of an unfinished structure increase during the stage of construction with the use of heavy-duty equipment. They are associated with the conditions of a multi-kilometer work front, different types of artificial structures (bridges and pipes), and the heterogeneity of the soil composition along the longitudinal and transverse profiles of embankments and excavations. Under these conditions, it is necessary to calculate the risk of subgrade stability violation from the construction machinery, at which point the safe load for soils (taking into account the pore pressure) Fb [12] does not conform to the technological impact. The limit is determined by the probability that the Fb value will be less than the process load Fm and the constructed part of the facility Fs:
2. Materials and Methods
- Tapping transverse water pockets to create drainage ditches and forming a protective layer based on the roadbed transverse profile’s projected type (further construction at the embankment top, side extension, or a new structure);
- Sealing the subgrade through a protective layer in autumn with a vibratory compactor to expel water inflow during the period of migration moisture accumulation.
3. Discussion and Results
4. Implementation
5. Conclusions
- 1.
- Subgrade construction in the permafrost zone can be expediently performed with the application of the developed high technology and geotechnical monitoring of mechanical and thermo-physical processes while regulating the permissible limits of construction loads. The process control system proposed in line with the monitoring enables the reduction of the moisture content and deformability of soil and can shorten the base consolidation period.
- 2.
- The construction of railroads features challenging engineering and geological, as well as permafrost, conditions for work and the activation of hazardous natural processes at unfinished structures. The risks of soil deformation and structural decline in the right of way increase due to the impact of heavy construction equipment and the diversity of the production program for constructing various structures on the multi-kilometer frontline works. Meanwhile, current regulatory documents lack reliability assessments of organizational and process solutions during the construction and reconstruction of the subgrade in high-temperature permafrost.
- 3.
- To implement the high technology for improving weak soil in the permafrost, it is expedient to provide a control plot with geotechnical monitoring and develop a process control system for construction that includes interrelated units of preparation for production and the automated control of the machinery in real time.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Executive Order of the President of the Russian Federation No. 645 Dated 26 October 2020 “On the Strategy for Developing the Russian Arctic Zone and Ensuring National Security until 2035”. Available online: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/566091182 (accessed on 2 December 2021).
- Federal Law No. 384-FZ Dated 30 December 2009 “Technical Regulations on the Safety of Buildings and Structures”. Available online: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/902192610 (accessed on 2 December 2021).
- Set of Rules N 25.13330.2020. Soil Bases and Foundations on Permafrost Soils. Available online: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/573659326 (accessed on 2 December 2021).
- Set of rules N 447.1325800.2019. Railways in the Permafrost Areas. General Positions of Projecting. Available online: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/561027907 (accessed on 2 December 2021).
- Set of Rules N 22.13330.2016. Soil Bases of Buildings and Structures. Available online: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/456054206 (accessed on 2 December 2021).
- Tsytovich, N.A. The Mechanics of Frozen Ground; JSC Vysshaya Shkola Publishers: Moscow, Russia, 1973; p. 446. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, J.; Peng, L. Experimental Study on the Unconfined Compression of a Thawing Soil. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 2009, 58, 92–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khrustalev, L.N. Fundamentals of Geotechnics in Cryolithozone; Moscow State University: Moscow, Russia, 2005; p. 541. [Google Scholar]
- Giprotransproekt JSC, RUT (MIIT). Special Specifications for Design and Construction of the Facility Completion of Construction (Reinforcement) of the Nadym–Pangody Railway Line; Giprotransproekt JSC, RUT (MIIT): St. Petersburg, Russia, 2020; p. 21. [Google Scholar]
- Lutsky, S.Y.; Shepitko, T.V.; Tokarev, P.M.; Dudnikov, A.N.; Cherkasov, A.M. Construction of Railways in the North; LATMES: Moscow, Russia, 2009; p. 284. [Google Scholar]
- Kharkhuta, N.Y.; Vasil’ev, Y.M. Strength, Stability and Compaction of Roadbed Soils of Highways; Transport: Moscow, Russia, 1975; p. 288. [Google Scholar]
- Lutsky, S.Y.; Ashpiz, E.S.; Dolgov, D.V. Roadbed and the Method of Its Erection. Russian Federation Patent No. 2273687, 24 February 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Lutsky, S.Y.; Roman, L.T. Process Control of Permafrost Soils Properties in the Road Base. In Foundations and Soil Mechanics; Firewall Media: New York, NY, USA, 2017; Volume 3, pp. 26–30. [Google Scholar]
- Ding, X.; Ren, D.; Montgomery, B.; Swindells, C. Automatic Monitoring of Slope Deformations Using Geotechnical Instruments. J. Surv. Eng. 2000, 126, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antonovskaya, G.N.; Afonin, N.Y.; Basakina, I.M.; Kapustian, N.K.; Basakin, B.G.; Danilov, A.V. Possibilities of seismic methods for the estimation of a railway roadbed state under the conditions of the far north. Transp. Syst. Technol. 2017, 3, 133–161, (In Russian, English). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Set of Rules N 305.1325800.2017. Buildings and Structures. The Rules of Geotechnical Monitoring under Construction. Available online: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/556330134 (accessed on 2 December 2021).
- Wang, J.; Zhang, C.C. Deformation monitoring of earth-rock dams based on three-dimensional laser scanning technology. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 2014, 36, 2345–2350. [Google Scholar]
- Moscow State University of Railway Transport (MIIT), TIMR. Recommendations on High Technology and Monitoring of Earthworks Construction on Weak Bases; Moscow State University of Railway Transport (MIIT), TIMR: Moscow, Russia, 2005; p. 93. [Google Scholar]
- Kudryavtsev, S.A.; Sakharov, I.I.; Paramonov, V.N. Soil Freezing and Thawing; Georekonstruktsiya: St. Petersburg, Russia, 2014; p. 87. [Google Scholar]
- McGregor, R.; Hayley, D.; Wilkins, G.; Hoeve, E.; Grozic, E.; Roujanski, V.; Jansen, A.; Dore, G. Guidelines for Development and Management of Transportation Infrastructure in Permafrost Regions; Transportation Association of Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2010; p. 192. [Google Scholar]
- Le Borgne, V.; Roghani, A.; Cobo, J.H.; Thivierge, S.-É.; Charbachi, P. Design and installation of a geotechnical monitoring system for monitoring freeze-thaw cycles on a railway track. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Cold Regions Engineering and 8th Canadian Permafrost Conference, Quebec City, QC, Canada, 18–22 August 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Funikova, V.V. Regularities of Dynamic Stability of Sandy and Clay Soils (Monograph); LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing: Saarbrucken, Deutschland, 2011; p. 199. [Google Scholar]
- Ausilio, E.; Conte, E.; Dente, G. Stability analysis of slopes reinforced with piles. Comput. Geotech. 2001, 28, 591–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lutsky, S.Y.; Shepitko, T.V.; Cherkasov, A.M. Composite Technology of Earthwork Construction on Taliks in Cryolithic Zones. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 2013, 5, 577–581. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Shepitko, T.V.; Lutsky, S.Y.; Nak, G.I.; Cherkasov, A.M. Technological Features of Construction and Reconstruction of Geotechnical Structures in the Arctic Zone. Designs 2022, 6, 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs6020034
Shepitko TV, Lutsky SY, Nak GI, Cherkasov AM. Technological Features of Construction and Reconstruction of Geotechnical Structures in the Arctic Zone. Designs. 2022; 6(2):34. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs6020034
Chicago/Turabian StyleShepitko, Taisiya V., Svyatoslav Ya. Lutsky, Grigory I. Nak, and Alexander M. Cherkasov. 2022. "Technological Features of Construction and Reconstruction of Geotechnical Structures in the Arctic Zone" Designs 6, no. 2: 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs6020034
APA StyleShepitko, T. V., Lutsky, S. Y., Nak, G. I., & Cherkasov, A. M. (2022). Technological Features of Construction and Reconstruction of Geotechnical Structures in the Arctic Zone. Designs, 6(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs6020034