Next Article in Journal
Augmented Reality for Autistic Children to Enhance Their Understanding of Facial Expressions
Next Article in Special Issue
In Search of Embodied Conversational and Explainable Agents for Health Behaviour Change and Adherence
Previous Article in Journal
Acquisition and User Behavior in Online Science Laboratories before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multimodal Warnings in Remote Operation: The Case Study on Remote Driving
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Accuracy and Repeatability Tests on HoloLens 2 and HTC Vive

by
Inês Soares
1,2,
Ricardo B. Sousa
1,2,
Marcelo Petry
2,* and
António Paulo Moreira
1,2
1
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, FEUP, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
2
INESC TEC—Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Multimodal Technol. Interact. 2021, 5(8), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/mti5080047
Submission received: 22 July 2021 / Revised: 9 August 2021 / Accepted: 16 August 2021 / Published: 23 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers of MTI in 2021)

Abstract

Augmented and virtual reality have been experiencing rapid growth in recent years, but there is still no deep knowledge regarding their capabilities and in what fields they could be explored. In that sense, this paper presents a study on the accuracy and repeatability of Microsoft’s HoloLens 2 (augmented reality device) and HTC Vive (virtual reality device) using an OptiTrack system as ground truth. For the HoloLens 2, the method used was hand tracking, whereas, in HTC Vive, the object tracked was the system’s hand controller. A series of tests in different scenarios and situations were performed to explore what could influence the measures. The HTC Vive obtained results in the millimeter range, while the HoloLens 2 revealed not very accurate measurements (around 2 cm). Although the difference can seem to be considerable, the fact that HoloLens 2 was tracking the user’s hand and not the system’s controller made a huge impact. The results are considered a significant step for the ongoing project of developing a human–robot interface by demonstrating an industrial robot using extended reality, which shows great potential to succeed based on our data.
Keywords: programming by demonstration; virtual reality; augmented reality; accuracy; repeatability programming by demonstration; virtual reality; augmented reality; accuracy; repeatability

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Soares, I.; B. Sousa, R.; Petry, M.; Moreira, A.P. Accuracy and Repeatability Tests on HoloLens 2 and HTC Vive. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 2021, 5, 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti5080047

AMA Style

Soares I, B. Sousa R, Petry M, Moreira AP. Accuracy and Repeatability Tests on HoloLens 2 and HTC Vive. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction. 2021; 5(8):47. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti5080047

Chicago/Turabian Style

Soares, Inês, Ricardo B. Sousa, Marcelo Petry, and António Paulo Moreira. 2021. "Accuracy and Repeatability Tests on HoloLens 2 and HTC Vive" Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 5, no. 8: 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti5080047

APA Style

Soares, I., B. Sousa, R., Petry, M., & Moreira, A. P. (2021). Accuracy and Repeatability Tests on HoloLens 2 and HTC Vive. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 5(8), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti5080047

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop