Next Article in Journal
Equilibrium, Kinetic, and Thermodynamic Studies of Cationic Dyes Adsorption on Corn Stalks Modified by Citric Acid
Previous Article in Journal
Performance of Oleic Acid and Soybean Oil in the Preparation of Oil-in-Water Microemulsions for Encapsulating a Highly Hydrophobic Molecule
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Dense Phases of γ-Gliadins in Confined Geometries

Colloids Interfaces 2021, 5(4), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids5040051
by Amélie Banc 1, Laurence Navailles 2, Jacques Leng 3 and Denis Renard 4,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Colloids Interfaces 2021, 5(4), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids5040051
Submission received: 16 August 2021 / Revised: 15 November 2021 / Accepted: 20 November 2021 / Published: 23 November 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors investigated the liquid-liquid phase separation of γ-Gliadins solution in a channel between PDMS and glass by using a microfluidic device. γ-Gliadins riched droplets are observed in the bulk as well as at the interfaces. The droplets formed at the interfaces are caused by the heterogeneous nucleation due to the short range interaction between liquid and interfaces. The results are interesting to the readers of Colloids and Interfaces. I would recommend for publication after a minor revision.

The authors claimed that the droplets are formed at the interfaces of PDMS and glass substrate. However,  it is not clear which interface is mainly responsible for the heterogeneous nucleation and at which interface droplet occurs earlier. This may be addressed if the wettabilities of γ-Gliadins droplet on the glass and PDMS membrane are known. I am wondering if the wettabilities of the γ-Gliadins droplet on these two interfaces are known.  Also, it is not clear to me why droplets detach from the interfaces to generate bulk-droplets. Is there a phase separation in the bulk to form droplets? Another mechanism might be the surface-directed phase separation.

I believe the heterogeneous nucleation may be explained by the Gibbs adsorption mechanism and Cahn's wetting transition theory. Can the authors comment on this?

 

Author Response

please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Banc et al. reported a microfluidic system for studying the binary phase diagram of gliadin. With the microfluidic device, authors observed that gliadin formed nucleation site on the surface first, and then grew into the bulk solution. I recommend the publication of this work after addressing the following concerns.

  1. Introduction should be separated into several paragraphs.
  2. The concentration gradient needs to be described quantitatively. How much difference in concentrations between the concentrated region and the diluted region?
  3. What is the role of surface contributing to the nucleation process? Is there any difference between PDMS surface and glass surface?
  4. For the Raman experiments, what is focal depth? From figure 1, it seemed that the bottom surface is glass. Please clarify.
  5. P2 line 51 and line 54 there are typos in the sentences.
  6. P3 line 72, 73, 74 and 76, there are typos in the sentences.

 

Author Response

please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Publish as is.

Back to TopTop